How long does parching touch last?Action in Combat , Can I make a full attack with touch attacks for a...
Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?
How do I exit BASH while loop using modulus operator?
Theorists sure want true answers to this!
What is required to make GPS signals available indoors?
Unlock My Phone! February 2018
Am I breaking OOP practice with this architecture?
How to prevent "they're falling in love" trope
What is the opposite of "eschatology"?
Was the Stack Exchange "Happy April Fools" page fitting with the '90's code?
Why is the sentence "Das ist eine Nase" correct?
Is there an online compendium of Rav Moshe teshuvos in English that exists?
Is this answer explanation correct?
Getting extremely large arrows with tikzcd
How to install cross-compiler on Ubuntu 18.04?
What is the fastest integer factorization to break RSA?
Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert
Why was Sir Cadogan fired?
Description list Formatting using enumitem
What's the meaning of "Sollensaussagen"?
Should I tell management that I intend to leave due to bad software development practices?
How to travel to Japan while expressing milk?
OP Amp not amplifying audio signal
Processor speed limited at 0.4 Ghz
Is it possible to map the firing of neurons in the human brain so as to stimulate artificial memories in someone else?
How long does parching touch last?
Action in Combat , Can I make a full attack with touch attacks for a trigger spell?How do touch spells work in Pathfinder?How long does a touch spell last before my familiar can deliver it?Can a Monk utilize touch based cantrips with their Unarmed Attacks?Some in depth questions about the working of chill touchCan an Antipaladin combine Touch of Corruption and a held touch spell?Natural weapons with multi-turn touch attack spellsHow can I use Vampiric Touch more often in combat?How does missing touch attacks affect chill touch remaining “attack charges”?Holding charges on touch attacks with multiple targetsCan I use unarmed attacks to deliver touch attacks?
$begingroup$
The parching touch spell from Sandstorm has a duration of instantaneous but says, "You can use this melee touch attack up to once per caster level."
So how much time do I have to make these attacks? Can I cast it at the morning, and use the touches when needed?
spells dnd-3.5e
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The parching touch spell from Sandstorm has a duration of instantaneous but says, "You can use this melee touch attack up to once per caster level."
So how much time do I have to make these attacks? Can I cast it at the morning, and use the touches when needed?
spells dnd-3.5e
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The parching touch spell from Sandstorm has a duration of instantaneous but says, "You can use this melee touch attack up to once per caster level."
So how much time do I have to make these attacks? Can I cast it at the morning, and use the touches when needed?
spells dnd-3.5e
$endgroup$
The parching touch spell from Sandstorm has a duration of instantaneous but says, "You can use this melee touch attack up to once per caster level."
So how much time do I have to make these attacks? Can I cast it at the morning, and use the touches when needed?
spells dnd-3.5e
spells dnd-3.5e
edited 42 mins ago
Hey I Can Chan
146k12259624
146k12259624
asked 2 hours ago
AndrásAndrás
29.4k15112208
29.4k15112208
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Taken all it once, the spell may seem contradictory. However, what it actually means is that the caster can cast the spell parching touch and thereafter make a number of parching touch attacks equal to his caster level, but the effects of those parching touch attacks remain forevermore—until healed or removed—, even after the caster makes his last parching touch attack.
See, the 1st-level Sor/Wiz spell parching touch [necro] (Sandstorm 118-19) has the entry Duration: Instantaneous, but the spell also has the entry Target: Living creature or creatures touched (up to one/level). Duration on Subjects, Effects, and Areas says
If the spell affects creatures directly (for example, charm person [or, for our purposes, parching touch]), the result travels with the subjects for the spell’s duration [which, in this case, is instantaneous—essentially forevermore until its effects are somehow healed or removed]. If the spell creates an effect, the effect lasts for the duration (176).
This is why the spell's description must say, "You can use this melee touch attack up to once per caster level." (Not incidentally, this way of carefully crafting touch spells that deal damage is also what makes the spell shivering touch subject to DM oversight.)
While a caster could, in the abstract, cast the spell at the day's start and adventure in such a fashion, touch spells make impractical long-term buffs. First, buried in Holding the Charge is the horrible accidental discharge rule that make this unpalatable: "If you touch anything or anyone while holding a charge, even unintentionally, the spell discharges" (Player's Handbook 141 and, yes, that's the whole thing… whatever it means and this DM suggests ignoring it). Second, and more importantly, the same section says, "If you cast another spell, the touch spell dissipates" (ibid.).
Thus it's possible if a wizard is a parching touch specialist for the spell to be his all-day jam—casting no further spells but still parching the crap out of foes until he exhausts the spell's uses—, but I suspect such wizards will be rare.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Technically indefinitely, though various factors make that impractical.
If a touch spell is not successfully discharged the round it is cast (generally because you miss your touch attack) then you are considered to be Holding the Charge and can continue to make touch attacks each round until you successfully hit. You can hold the charge of a touch spell indefinitely, but touching anything or anyone, even unintentionally, will discharge it, making the prospect impractical for any real length of time. You also cannot cast any other spells without losing the touch spell, which is likely to outweigh any benefit you would get from casting it early and holding the charge all day.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm not looking at the spell text, but if it only targets creatures, it won't discharge on objects, which can making holding the charge for an extended period more likely (and more dangerous, since if you mess up, you're not hitting something that can't die...). One neat trick would be to use a feat or feature that lets you give someone or something else your touch spell to deliver - a familiar or follower could be much more deadly with an all-day multi-use touch spell.
$endgroup$
– gatherer818
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@gatherer818 I think, since you're not targeting the thing you touch accidentally, that the spell would likely trigger anyway, but, really, the accidental discharge rule is so vague as to be unplayable. (Does making a fist discharge the spell? Tying your shoe? Walking?) It's much worse—for a caster, anyway—to be unable to cast any other spells.
$endgroup$
– Hey I Can Chan
38 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Depends on the Spell
Most spells with an instantaneous duration will include an explicit or implicit statement of how long the effects last.
For example the spell listed in the question has the line:
You can use this melee touch attack up to once per caster level.
In other words, the spell instantly has an effect, but the effects last for one melee touch attack/caster level.
Compare this to the spell description for Fabricate taken from the SRD, which has an instantaneous duration:
You convert material of one sort into a product that is of the same material. Creatures or magic items cannot be created or transmuted by the fabricate spell. The quality of items made by this spell is commensurate with the quality of material used as the basis for the new fabrication. If you work with a mineral, the target is reduced to 1 cubic foot per level instead of 10 cubic feet.
You must make an appropriate Craft check to fabricate articles requiring a high degree of craftsmanship.
Casting requires 1 round per 10 cubic feet (or 1 cubic foot) of material to be affected by the spell.
Interestingly enough, the last line overrides the "instantaneous" duration, but more importantly there is no mention of how long the effects of the spell last. This creates an implicit duration: forever.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144431%2fhow-long-does-parching-touch-last%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Taken all it once, the spell may seem contradictory. However, what it actually means is that the caster can cast the spell parching touch and thereafter make a number of parching touch attacks equal to his caster level, but the effects of those parching touch attacks remain forevermore—until healed or removed—, even after the caster makes his last parching touch attack.
See, the 1st-level Sor/Wiz spell parching touch [necro] (Sandstorm 118-19) has the entry Duration: Instantaneous, but the spell also has the entry Target: Living creature or creatures touched (up to one/level). Duration on Subjects, Effects, and Areas says
If the spell affects creatures directly (for example, charm person [or, for our purposes, parching touch]), the result travels with the subjects for the spell’s duration [which, in this case, is instantaneous—essentially forevermore until its effects are somehow healed or removed]. If the spell creates an effect, the effect lasts for the duration (176).
This is why the spell's description must say, "You can use this melee touch attack up to once per caster level." (Not incidentally, this way of carefully crafting touch spells that deal damage is also what makes the spell shivering touch subject to DM oversight.)
While a caster could, in the abstract, cast the spell at the day's start and adventure in such a fashion, touch spells make impractical long-term buffs. First, buried in Holding the Charge is the horrible accidental discharge rule that make this unpalatable: "If you touch anything or anyone while holding a charge, even unintentionally, the spell discharges" (Player's Handbook 141 and, yes, that's the whole thing… whatever it means and this DM suggests ignoring it). Second, and more importantly, the same section says, "If you cast another spell, the touch spell dissipates" (ibid.).
Thus it's possible if a wizard is a parching touch specialist for the spell to be his all-day jam—casting no further spells but still parching the crap out of foes until he exhausts the spell's uses—, but I suspect such wizards will be rare.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Taken all it once, the spell may seem contradictory. However, what it actually means is that the caster can cast the spell parching touch and thereafter make a number of parching touch attacks equal to his caster level, but the effects of those parching touch attacks remain forevermore—until healed or removed—, even after the caster makes his last parching touch attack.
See, the 1st-level Sor/Wiz spell parching touch [necro] (Sandstorm 118-19) has the entry Duration: Instantaneous, but the spell also has the entry Target: Living creature or creatures touched (up to one/level). Duration on Subjects, Effects, and Areas says
If the spell affects creatures directly (for example, charm person [or, for our purposes, parching touch]), the result travels with the subjects for the spell’s duration [which, in this case, is instantaneous—essentially forevermore until its effects are somehow healed or removed]. If the spell creates an effect, the effect lasts for the duration (176).
This is why the spell's description must say, "You can use this melee touch attack up to once per caster level." (Not incidentally, this way of carefully crafting touch spells that deal damage is also what makes the spell shivering touch subject to DM oversight.)
While a caster could, in the abstract, cast the spell at the day's start and adventure in such a fashion, touch spells make impractical long-term buffs. First, buried in Holding the Charge is the horrible accidental discharge rule that make this unpalatable: "If you touch anything or anyone while holding a charge, even unintentionally, the spell discharges" (Player's Handbook 141 and, yes, that's the whole thing… whatever it means and this DM suggests ignoring it). Second, and more importantly, the same section says, "If you cast another spell, the touch spell dissipates" (ibid.).
Thus it's possible if a wizard is a parching touch specialist for the spell to be his all-day jam—casting no further spells but still parching the crap out of foes until he exhausts the spell's uses—, but I suspect such wizards will be rare.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Taken all it once, the spell may seem contradictory. However, what it actually means is that the caster can cast the spell parching touch and thereafter make a number of parching touch attacks equal to his caster level, but the effects of those parching touch attacks remain forevermore—until healed or removed—, even after the caster makes his last parching touch attack.
See, the 1st-level Sor/Wiz spell parching touch [necro] (Sandstorm 118-19) has the entry Duration: Instantaneous, but the spell also has the entry Target: Living creature or creatures touched (up to one/level). Duration on Subjects, Effects, and Areas says
If the spell affects creatures directly (for example, charm person [or, for our purposes, parching touch]), the result travels with the subjects for the spell’s duration [which, in this case, is instantaneous—essentially forevermore until its effects are somehow healed or removed]. If the spell creates an effect, the effect lasts for the duration (176).
This is why the spell's description must say, "You can use this melee touch attack up to once per caster level." (Not incidentally, this way of carefully crafting touch spells that deal damage is also what makes the spell shivering touch subject to DM oversight.)
While a caster could, in the abstract, cast the spell at the day's start and adventure in such a fashion, touch spells make impractical long-term buffs. First, buried in Holding the Charge is the horrible accidental discharge rule that make this unpalatable: "If you touch anything or anyone while holding a charge, even unintentionally, the spell discharges" (Player's Handbook 141 and, yes, that's the whole thing… whatever it means and this DM suggests ignoring it). Second, and more importantly, the same section says, "If you cast another spell, the touch spell dissipates" (ibid.).
Thus it's possible if a wizard is a parching touch specialist for the spell to be his all-day jam—casting no further spells but still parching the crap out of foes until he exhausts the spell's uses—, but I suspect such wizards will be rare.
$endgroup$
Taken all it once, the spell may seem contradictory. However, what it actually means is that the caster can cast the spell parching touch and thereafter make a number of parching touch attacks equal to his caster level, but the effects of those parching touch attacks remain forevermore—until healed or removed—, even after the caster makes his last parching touch attack.
See, the 1st-level Sor/Wiz spell parching touch [necro] (Sandstorm 118-19) has the entry Duration: Instantaneous, but the spell also has the entry Target: Living creature or creatures touched (up to one/level). Duration on Subjects, Effects, and Areas says
If the spell affects creatures directly (for example, charm person [or, for our purposes, parching touch]), the result travels with the subjects for the spell’s duration [which, in this case, is instantaneous—essentially forevermore until its effects are somehow healed or removed]. If the spell creates an effect, the effect lasts for the duration (176).
This is why the spell's description must say, "You can use this melee touch attack up to once per caster level." (Not incidentally, this way of carefully crafting touch spells that deal damage is also what makes the spell shivering touch subject to DM oversight.)
While a caster could, in the abstract, cast the spell at the day's start and adventure in such a fashion, touch spells make impractical long-term buffs. First, buried in Holding the Charge is the horrible accidental discharge rule that make this unpalatable: "If you touch anything or anyone while holding a charge, even unintentionally, the spell discharges" (Player's Handbook 141 and, yes, that's the whole thing… whatever it means and this DM suggests ignoring it). Second, and more importantly, the same section says, "If you cast another spell, the touch spell dissipates" (ibid.).
Thus it's possible if a wizard is a parching touch specialist for the spell to be his all-day jam—casting no further spells but still parching the crap out of foes until he exhausts the spell's uses—, but I suspect such wizards will be rare.
answered 1 hour ago
Hey I Can ChanHey I Can Chan
146k12259624
146k12259624
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Technically indefinitely, though various factors make that impractical.
If a touch spell is not successfully discharged the round it is cast (generally because you miss your touch attack) then you are considered to be Holding the Charge and can continue to make touch attacks each round until you successfully hit. You can hold the charge of a touch spell indefinitely, but touching anything or anyone, even unintentionally, will discharge it, making the prospect impractical for any real length of time. You also cannot cast any other spells without losing the touch spell, which is likely to outweigh any benefit you would get from casting it early and holding the charge all day.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm not looking at the spell text, but if it only targets creatures, it won't discharge on objects, which can making holding the charge for an extended period more likely (and more dangerous, since if you mess up, you're not hitting something that can't die...). One neat trick would be to use a feat or feature that lets you give someone or something else your touch spell to deliver - a familiar or follower could be much more deadly with an all-day multi-use touch spell.
$endgroup$
– gatherer818
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@gatherer818 I think, since you're not targeting the thing you touch accidentally, that the spell would likely trigger anyway, but, really, the accidental discharge rule is so vague as to be unplayable. (Does making a fist discharge the spell? Tying your shoe? Walking?) It's much worse—for a caster, anyway—to be unable to cast any other spells.
$endgroup$
– Hey I Can Chan
38 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Technically indefinitely, though various factors make that impractical.
If a touch spell is not successfully discharged the round it is cast (generally because you miss your touch attack) then you are considered to be Holding the Charge and can continue to make touch attacks each round until you successfully hit. You can hold the charge of a touch spell indefinitely, but touching anything or anyone, even unintentionally, will discharge it, making the prospect impractical for any real length of time. You also cannot cast any other spells without losing the touch spell, which is likely to outweigh any benefit you would get from casting it early and holding the charge all day.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm not looking at the spell text, but if it only targets creatures, it won't discharge on objects, which can making holding the charge for an extended period more likely (and more dangerous, since if you mess up, you're not hitting something that can't die...). One neat trick would be to use a feat or feature that lets you give someone or something else your touch spell to deliver - a familiar or follower could be much more deadly with an all-day multi-use touch spell.
$endgroup$
– gatherer818
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@gatherer818 I think, since you're not targeting the thing you touch accidentally, that the spell would likely trigger anyway, but, really, the accidental discharge rule is so vague as to be unplayable. (Does making a fist discharge the spell? Tying your shoe? Walking?) It's much worse—for a caster, anyway—to be unable to cast any other spells.
$endgroup$
– Hey I Can Chan
38 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Technically indefinitely, though various factors make that impractical.
If a touch spell is not successfully discharged the round it is cast (generally because you miss your touch attack) then you are considered to be Holding the Charge and can continue to make touch attacks each round until you successfully hit. You can hold the charge of a touch spell indefinitely, but touching anything or anyone, even unintentionally, will discharge it, making the prospect impractical for any real length of time. You also cannot cast any other spells without losing the touch spell, which is likely to outweigh any benefit you would get from casting it early and holding the charge all day.
$endgroup$
Technically indefinitely, though various factors make that impractical.
If a touch spell is not successfully discharged the round it is cast (generally because you miss your touch attack) then you are considered to be Holding the Charge and can continue to make touch attacks each round until you successfully hit. You can hold the charge of a touch spell indefinitely, but touching anything or anyone, even unintentionally, will discharge it, making the prospect impractical for any real length of time. You also cannot cast any other spells without losing the touch spell, which is likely to outweigh any benefit you would get from casting it early and holding the charge all day.
answered 2 hours ago
Kyle DoyleKyle Doyle
1,6021612
1,6021612
$begingroup$
I'm not looking at the spell text, but if it only targets creatures, it won't discharge on objects, which can making holding the charge for an extended period more likely (and more dangerous, since if you mess up, you're not hitting something that can't die...). One neat trick would be to use a feat or feature that lets you give someone or something else your touch spell to deliver - a familiar or follower could be much more deadly with an all-day multi-use touch spell.
$endgroup$
– gatherer818
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@gatherer818 I think, since you're not targeting the thing you touch accidentally, that the spell would likely trigger anyway, but, really, the accidental discharge rule is so vague as to be unplayable. (Does making a fist discharge the spell? Tying your shoe? Walking?) It's much worse—for a caster, anyway—to be unable to cast any other spells.
$endgroup$
– Hey I Can Chan
38 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm not looking at the spell text, but if it only targets creatures, it won't discharge on objects, which can making holding the charge for an extended period more likely (and more dangerous, since if you mess up, you're not hitting something that can't die...). One neat trick would be to use a feat or feature that lets you give someone or something else your touch spell to deliver - a familiar or follower could be much more deadly with an all-day multi-use touch spell.
$endgroup$
– gatherer818
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@gatherer818 I think, since you're not targeting the thing you touch accidentally, that the spell would likely trigger anyway, but, really, the accidental discharge rule is so vague as to be unplayable. (Does making a fist discharge the spell? Tying your shoe? Walking?) It's much worse—for a caster, anyway—to be unable to cast any other spells.
$endgroup$
– Hey I Can Chan
38 mins ago
$begingroup$
I'm not looking at the spell text, but if it only targets creatures, it won't discharge on objects, which can making holding the charge for an extended period more likely (and more dangerous, since if you mess up, you're not hitting something that can't die...). One neat trick would be to use a feat or feature that lets you give someone or something else your touch spell to deliver - a familiar or follower could be much more deadly with an all-day multi-use touch spell.
$endgroup$
– gatherer818
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I'm not looking at the spell text, but if it only targets creatures, it won't discharge on objects, which can making holding the charge for an extended period more likely (and more dangerous, since if you mess up, you're not hitting something that can't die...). One neat trick would be to use a feat or feature that lets you give someone or something else your touch spell to deliver - a familiar or follower could be much more deadly with an all-day multi-use touch spell.
$endgroup$
– gatherer818
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@gatherer818 I think, since you're not targeting the thing you touch accidentally, that the spell would likely trigger anyway, but, really, the accidental discharge rule is so vague as to be unplayable. (Does making a fist discharge the spell? Tying your shoe? Walking?) It's much worse—for a caster, anyway—to be unable to cast any other spells.
$endgroup$
– Hey I Can Chan
38 mins ago
$begingroup$
@gatherer818 I think, since you're not targeting the thing you touch accidentally, that the spell would likely trigger anyway, but, really, the accidental discharge rule is so vague as to be unplayable. (Does making a fist discharge the spell? Tying your shoe? Walking?) It's much worse—for a caster, anyway—to be unable to cast any other spells.
$endgroup$
– Hey I Can Chan
38 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Depends on the Spell
Most spells with an instantaneous duration will include an explicit or implicit statement of how long the effects last.
For example the spell listed in the question has the line:
You can use this melee touch attack up to once per caster level.
In other words, the spell instantly has an effect, but the effects last for one melee touch attack/caster level.
Compare this to the spell description for Fabricate taken from the SRD, which has an instantaneous duration:
You convert material of one sort into a product that is of the same material. Creatures or magic items cannot be created or transmuted by the fabricate spell. The quality of items made by this spell is commensurate with the quality of material used as the basis for the new fabrication. If you work with a mineral, the target is reduced to 1 cubic foot per level instead of 10 cubic feet.
You must make an appropriate Craft check to fabricate articles requiring a high degree of craftsmanship.
Casting requires 1 round per 10 cubic feet (or 1 cubic foot) of material to be affected by the spell.
Interestingly enough, the last line overrides the "instantaneous" duration, but more importantly there is no mention of how long the effects of the spell last. This creates an implicit duration: forever.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Depends on the Spell
Most spells with an instantaneous duration will include an explicit or implicit statement of how long the effects last.
For example the spell listed in the question has the line:
You can use this melee touch attack up to once per caster level.
In other words, the spell instantly has an effect, but the effects last for one melee touch attack/caster level.
Compare this to the spell description for Fabricate taken from the SRD, which has an instantaneous duration:
You convert material of one sort into a product that is of the same material. Creatures or magic items cannot be created or transmuted by the fabricate spell. The quality of items made by this spell is commensurate with the quality of material used as the basis for the new fabrication. If you work with a mineral, the target is reduced to 1 cubic foot per level instead of 10 cubic feet.
You must make an appropriate Craft check to fabricate articles requiring a high degree of craftsmanship.
Casting requires 1 round per 10 cubic feet (or 1 cubic foot) of material to be affected by the spell.
Interestingly enough, the last line overrides the "instantaneous" duration, but more importantly there is no mention of how long the effects of the spell last. This creates an implicit duration: forever.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Depends on the Spell
Most spells with an instantaneous duration will include an explicit or implicit statement of how long the effects last.
For example the spell listed in the question has the line:
You can use this melee touch attack up to once per caster level.
In other words, the spell instantly has an effect, but the effects last for one melee touch attack/caster level.
Compare this to the spell description for Fabricate taken from the SRD, which has an instantaneous duration:
You convert material of one sort into a product that is of the same material. Creatures or magic items cannot be created or transmuted by the fabricate spell. The quality of items made by this spell is commensurate with the quality of material used as the basis for the new fabrication. If you work with a mineral, the target is reduced to 1 cubic foot per level instead of 10 cubic feet.
You must make an appropriate Craft check to fabricate articles requiring a high degree of craftsmanship.
Casting requires 1 round per 10 cubic feet (or 1 cubic foot) of material to be affected by the spell.
Interestingly enough, the last line overrides the "instantaneous" duration, but more importantly there is no mention of how long the effects of the spell last. This creates an implicit duration: forever.
$endgroup$
Depends on the Spell
Most spells with an instantaneous duration will include an explicit or implicit statement of how long the effects last.
For example the spell listed in the question has the line:
You can use this melee touch attack up to once per caster level.
In other words, the spell instantly has an effect, but the effects last for one melee touch attack/caster level.
Compare this to the spell description for Fabricate taken from the SRD, which has an instantaneous duration:
You convert material of one sort into a product that is of the same material. Creatures or magic items cannot be created or transmuted by the fabricate spell. The quality of items made by this spell is commensurate with the quality of material used as the basis for the new fabrication. If you work with a mineral, the target is reduced to 1 cubic foot per level instead of 10 cubic feet.
You must make an appropriate Craft check to fabricate articles requiring a high degree of craftsmanship.
Casting requires 1 round per 10 cubic feet (or 1 cubic foot) of material to be affected by the spell.
Interestingly enough, the last line overrides the "instantaneous" duration, but more importantly there is no mention of how long the effects of the spell last. This creates an implicit duration: forever.
answered 1 hour ago
Connor ClarkeConnor Clarke
3929
3929
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144431%2fhow-long-does-parching-touch-last%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown