Sudden drop in drive performance across all drives The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey...

Inline version of a function returns different value then non-inline version

How to manage monthly salary

"Riffle" two strings

Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium

Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently

Could JWST stay at L2 "forever"?

What is the use of option -o in the useradd command?

Limit the amount of RAM Mathematica may access?

aging parents with no investments

Does duplicating a spell with Wish count as casting that spell?

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

What tool would a Roman-age civilization have to grind silver and other metals into dust?

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

What is the steepest angle that a canal can be traversable without locks?

Realistic Alternatives to Dust: What Else Could Feed a Plankton Bloom?

Should I use my personal or workplace e-mail when registering to external websites for work purpose?

What does "sndry explns" mean in one of the Hitchhiker's guide books?

Why is Grand Jury testimony secret?

Where to refill my bottle in India?

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

"What time...?" or "At what time...?" - what is more grammatically correct?

In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

If a poisoned arrow's piercing damage is reduced to 0, do you still get poisoned?



Sudden drop in drive performance across all drives



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InIs it normal for Windows Software Raid (Mirroring) to slow a drive's performance?Slow HDD test results: Symptom of slow PC or the cause?Add a small RAID card? Will it help overall stability and performance of my nine hard drives?Are there any performance benefits to fully formatting a hard drive (vs. a quick format)?SAS 15,000rpm RAID 0 slower than external eSATA single 7200rpm drive. Why?Is it possible to configure a multiplatter hard drive as separate drives?RAID Disk failure - one per day (3ware 9650SE - Seagate Barracuda 3TB)Is it possible to have multiple raid settings in ASUS ROG ZENITH EXTREME?Should all drives on a USB 3.0 (USB3) Hub be the same speed?Testing Hard Drive Performance





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







1















I have a NAS server running Ubuntu Server on a VM under windows and recently I had all the drives that are part of the VM drop in sequential read/write performance from 95 to 125MB/s reads and writes on each drive to ~30MB/s reads and writes.



The server has access to 6 physical drives: 5 in an external USB enclosure (2 in raid 0) and 1 more in the computer chassis. 4 of the drives and 4tb Seagate Barracuda Drives and two are generic HGST 6tb enterprise drives. All are formatted with NTFS since I occasionally need to directly connect to windows with them.
the server is running both samba and minidlna servers



troubleshooting steps that I've done so far.



-test drive performance directly under ubuntu using the dd command. all drives ~30MB/s with the exception of the raid drive which is ~20MB/s.



-disconnect drives and test directly in windows using CrystalDiskMark. same result for speed, .



-run chkdsk /f on all drives. no issues



-run defrag /a on all drives. <1% fragmentation



-check S.M.A.R.T data on drives, no issues.



any further troubleshooting steps that I can try would be very welcome. I'd like to be able to get the drive performance back up to the level where I can saturate the gigabit network connection like it was able to before.










share|improve this question







New contributor




user2209743 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Do you have by chance a sandy bridge CPU? First revision of P67 chipsets had problems with SATA2 ports performance degrading over time. In any case information about your hardware can be relevant.

    – Igb
    2 days ago













  • running an i7-6950x, x99 chipset, 128gb ram. the external usb drive enclosure is a teramaster d5-300C for 5 drives and the last drive is wired directly to the motherboard on one of the chipset sata3 ports. there were no hardware changes that corresponded with the performance drop.

    – user2209743
    2 days ago


















1















I have a NAS server running Ubuntu Server on a VM under windows and recently I had all the drives that are part of the VM drop in sequential read/write performance from 95 to 125MB/s reads and writes on each drive to ~30MB/s reads and writes.



The server has access to 6 physical drives: 5 in an external USB enclosure (2 in raid 0) and 1 more in the computer chassis. 4 of the drives and 4tb Seagate Barracuda Drives and two are generic HGST 6tb enterprise drives. All are formatted with NTFS since I occasionally need to directly connect to windows with them.
the server is running both samba and minidlna servers



troubleshooting steps that I've done so far.



-test drive performance directly under ubuntu using the dd command. all drives ~30MB/s with the exception of the raid drive which is ~20MB/s.



-disconnect drives and test directly in windows using CrystalDiskMark. same result for speed, .



-run chkdsk /f on all drives. no issues



-run defrag /a on all drives. <1% fragmentation



-check S.M.A.R.T data on drives, no issues.



any further troubleshooting steps that I can try would be very welcome. I'd like to be able to get the drive performance back up to the level where I can saturate the gigabit network connection like it was able to before.










share|improve this question







New contributor




user2209743 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Do you have by chance a sandy bridge CPU? First revision of P67 chipsets had problems with SATA2 ports performance degrading over time. In any case information about your hardware can be relevant.

    – Igb
    2 days ago













  • running an i7-6950x, x99 chipset, 128gb ram. the external usb drive enclosure is a teramaster d5-300C for 5 drives and the last drive is wired directly to the motherboard on one of the chipset sata3 ports. there were no hardware changes that corresponded with the performance drop.

    – user2209743
    2 days ago














1












1








1








I have a NAS server running Ubuntu Server on a VM under windows and recently I had all the drives that are part of the VM drop in sequential read/write performance from 95 to 125MB/s reads and writes on each drive to ~30MB/s reads and writes.



The server has access to 6 physical drives: 5 in an external USB enclosure (2 in raid 0) and 1 more in the computer chassis. 4 of the drives and 4tb Seagate Barracuda Drives and two are generic HGST 6tb enterprise drives. All are formatted with NTFS since I occasionally need to directly connect to windows with them.
the server is running both samba and minidlna servers



troubleshooting steps that I've done so far.



-test drive performance directly under ubuntu using the dd command. all drives ~30MB/s with the exception of the raid drive which is ~20MB/s.



-disconnect drives and test directly in windows using CrystalDiskMark. same result for speed, .



-run chkdsk /f on all drives. no issues



-run defrag /a on all drives. <1% fragmentation



-check S.M.A.R.T data on drives, no issues.



any further troubleshooting steps that I can try would be very welcome. I'd like to be able to get the drive performance back up to the level where I can saturate the gigabit network connection like it was able to before.










share|improve this question







New contributor




user2209743 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I have a NAS server running Ubuntu Server on a VM under windows and recently I had all the drives that are part of the VM drop in sequential read/write performance from 95 to 125MB/s reads and writes on each drive to ~30MB/s reads and writes.



The server has access to 6 physical drives: 5 in an external USB enclosure (2 in raid 0) and 1 more in the computer chassis. 4 of the drives and 4tb Seagate Barracuda Drives and two are generic HGST 6tb enterprise drives. All are formatted with NTFS since I occasionally need to directly connect to windows with them.
the server is running both samba and minidlna servers



troubleshooting steps that I've done so far.



-test drive performance directly under ubuntu using the dd command. all drives ~30MB/s with the exception of the raid drive which is ~20MB/s.



-disconnect drives and test directly in windows using CrystalDiskMark. same result for speed, .



-run chkdsk /f on all drives. no issues



-run defrag /a on all drives. <1% fragmentation



-check S.M.A.R.T data on drives, no issues.



any further troubleshooting steps that I can try would be very welcome. I'd like to be able to get the drive performance back up to the level where I can saturate the gigabit network connection like it was able to before.







hard-drive






share|improve this question







New contributor




user2209743 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




user2209743 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




user2209743 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









user2209743user2209743

61




61




New contributor




user2209743 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user2209743 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user2209743 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1





    Do you have by chance a sandy bridge CPU? First revision of P67 chipsets had problems with SATA2 ports performance degrading over time. In any case information about your hardware can be relevant.

    – Igb
    2 days ago













  • running an i7-6950x, x99 chipset, 128gb ram. the external usb drive enclosure is a teramaster d5-300C for 5 drives and the last drive is wired directly to the motherboard on one of the chipset sata3 ports. there were no hardware changes that corresponded with the performance drop.

    – user2209743
    2 days ago














  • 1





    Do you have by chance a sandy bridge CPU? First revision of P67 chipsets had problems with SATA2 ports performance degrading over time. In any case information about your hardware can be relevant.

    – Igb
    2 days ago













  • running an i7-6950x, x99 chipset, 128gb ram. the external usb drive enclosure is a teramaster d5-300C for 5 drives and the last drive is wired directly to the motherboard on one of the chipset sata3 ports. there were no hardware changes that corresponded with the performance drop.

    – user2209743
    2 days ago








1




1





Do you have by chance a sandy bridge CPU? First revision of P67 chipsets had problems with SATA2 ports performance degrading over time. In any case information about your hardware can be relevant.

– Igb
2 days ago







Do you have by chance a sandy bridge CPU? First revision of P67 chipsets had problems with SATA2 ports performance degrading over time. In any case information about your hardware can be relevant.

– Igb
2 days ago















running an i7-6950x, x99 chipset, 128gb ram. the external usb drive enclosure is a teramaster d5-300C for 5 drives and the last drive is wired directly to the motherboard on one of the chipset sata3 ports. there were no hardware changes that corresponded with the performance drop.

– user2209743
2 days ago





running an i7-6950x, x99 chipset, 128gb ram. the external usb drive enclosure is a teramaster d5-300C for 5 drives and the last drive is wired directly to the motherboard on one of the chipset sata3 ports. there were no hardware changes that corresponded with the performance drop.

– user2209743
2 days ago










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






user2209743 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1422588%2fsudden-drop-in-drive-performance-across-all-drives%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








user2209743 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















user2209743 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













user2209743 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












user2209743 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1422588%2fsudden-drop-in-drive-performance-across-all-drives%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Cannot install PyQt5 The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCannot install tcpreplay 3.4.4cannot...

Kapp-Putsch Acontecimentos | Outros artigos | Menu de navegação

Why did early computer designers eschew integers? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat register...