Assembly executable on Termux now produces Illegal instruction error The 2019 Stack Overflow...

How long do I have to send payment?

Should I use my personal or workplace e-mail when registering to external websites for work purpose?

"Riffle" two strings

What is the use of option -o in the useradd command?

Why is it "Tumoren" and not "Tumore"?

Should I write numbers in words or as numerals when there are multiple next to each other?

What can other administrators access on my machine?

Extreme, unacceptable situation and I can't attend work tomorrow morning

On the insanity of kings as an argument against monarchy

Limit the amount of RAM Mathematica may access?

Falsification in Math vs Science

Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

I looked up a future colleague on LinkedIn before I started a job. I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

Inversion Puzzle

"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"

Carnot-Caratheodory metric

Lethal sonic weapons



Assembly executable on Termux now produces Illegal instruction error



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat are the meanings of /usr/sbin, /usr/local/sbin and /usr/local/bin?gcc running out of memory in Ubuntu 12.10Uninstall gcc from sourcegcc --as-needed linker flag not workingUnable to move MySQL data to external driveWhat happens when assembly code is translated into Object code?scs2ascii and SSLv2_client_method errors while running the make command during the installation of tn5250 on Linux Ubuntu 16.04 LTSIllegal instruction [samba][nmbd][linux]What does each of the color palette entries change the color of?Why is the compiler adding an extra 'sxtw' instruction (resulting further in a kernel panic)?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







0















Can you let me know what I'm doing wrong?

I'm new to assembly programming and am unfamiliar with the various options in ld.



I've been trying to use the yasm compiler initially but then realised that as is the way to go for the ARM architecture while composing GNU compliant assembly code.



Better luck running as from the binutils package I. E.,the GNU assembler. But the assembly code has to be Arm-compliant.



The following is the code within arm.s:



 .global main                      /* declares the main identifier */ 
.type main , % function main : /* Address of the main function */
/* Program code would go here */
BR LR
/* Return to the caller */
.end /* End of the program */


ARM, a RISC architecture, is not supported by YASM.



My build file is as follows:



#/usr/bin/env bash
#display usage
[ $# -eq 0 ] && { echo "Usage: $0 ";exit 1; }
set +e
rm -f $1.exe $1 $1.o
as -o $1.o $1.s
[ -e $1.o ] && { file $1.o;}
gcc -s -o $1.exe $1.o -fpic
ld -s -o $1 -pie --dynamic-linker /system/bin/linker64 /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o $1.o -lc -lgcc -ldl /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtend_android.o
[ -e $1.exe ] && { file $1.exe;nohup ./$1.exe; }

[ -e $1 ] && { file $1;nohup ./$1;}
set -e



The code was causing either a segmentation fault or a bus error earlier.



I was able to run a program or two without any segmentation or bus errors with the updated build file above. I set up the build file to produce two executables, one using gcc and the other ld, since some online tutorials use ld instead of gcc for the linking step. Using the verbose setting of gcc, you can look at the options passed to the linker and thus mimic the same for the linker independently.



There may be some redundant settings that I've missed.



You can access updates to the source code and build file at
Learn Assembly.



Check out this resource from Keil here. arm Keil product guides



More resources:



https://thinkingeek.com/2016/10/08/exploring-aarch64-assembler-chapter1/



https://stackoverflow.com/q/3577922/3924108



While the above problem appears to be fixed for now, I have errors running the following code:



.text .global main main: mov w0, #2 mov w7, #1 // request to exit program svc 0



I obtain an illegal instruction error when I try to execute the code.



Secondly, if I alter the main to _start (since I don't want to be using main all the time), I have the following error from the buildrun script.





./buildrun myprogram



/data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: myprogram.o: in function _start': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of_start'; /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o:crtbegin.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o: in function _start_main': crtbegin.c:(.text+0x38): undefined reference tomain
/data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: crtbegin.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to main' clang-8: error: linker command failed with exit co
de 1 (use -v to see invocation)
ld: myprogram.o: in function
_start': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of _start'; /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o:crtbegin.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here ld: /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o: in function_start_main': crtbegin.c:(.text+0x38): undefined reference to main'
ld: crtbegin.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to
main'





How do I create programs with entry points other than main?



I want to be able to :



Create a statically linked executable that works.
Create an executable that has a function named _start instead of main.
Create a dynamically linked executable with an entry point other than main.
Create an executable that uses supervisor call svc to exit without throwing an illegal instruction error as against using ret.



Reference:



https://thinkingeek.com/2013/01/09/arm-assembler-raspberry-pi-chapter-1/



Check the comment by ehrt74 on the above post.










share|improve this question































    0















    Can you let me know what I'm doing wrong?

    I'm new to assembly programming and am unfamiliar with the various options in ld.



    I've been trying to use the yasm compiler initially but then realised that as is the way to go for the ARM architecture while composing GNU compliant assembly code.



    Better luck running as from the binutils package I. E.,the GNU assembler. But the assembly code has to be Arm-compliant.



    The following is the code within arm.s:



     .global main                      /* declares the main identifier */ 
    .type main , % function main : /* Address of the main function */
    /* Program code would go here */
    BR LR
    /* Return to the caller */
    .end /* End of the program */


    ARM, a RISC architecture, is not supported by YASM.



    My build file is as follows:



    #/usr/bin/env bash
    #display usage
    [ $# -eq 0 ] && { echo "Usage: $0 ";exit 1; }
    set +e
    rm -f $1.exe $1 $1.o
    as -o $1.o $1.s
    [ -e $1.o ] && { file $1.o;}
    gcc -s -o $1.exe $1.o -fpic
    ld -s -o $1 -pie --dynamic-linker /system/bin/linker64 /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o $1.o -lc -lgcc -ldl /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtend_android.o
    [ -e $1.exe ] && { file $1.exe;nohup ./$1.exe; }

    [ -e $1 ] && { file $1;nohup ./$1;}
    set -e



    The code was causing either a segmentation fault or a bus error earlier.



    I was able to run a program or two without any segmentation or bus errors with the updated build file above. I set up the build file to produce two executables, one using gcc and the other ld, since some online tutorials use ld instead of gcc for the linking step. Using the verbose setting of gcc, you can look at the options passed to the linker and thus mimic the same for the linker independently.



    There may be some redundant settings that I've missed.



    You can access updates to the source code and build file at
    Learn Assembly.



    Check out this resource from Keil here. arm Keil product guides



    More resources:



    https://thinkingeek.com/2016/10/08/exploring-aarch64-assembler-chapter1/



    https://stackoverflow.com/q/3577922/3924108



    While the above problem appears to be fixed for now, I have errors running the following code:



    .text .global main main: mov w0, #2 mov w7, #1 // request to exit program svc 0



    I obtain an illegal instruction error when I try to execute the code.



    Secondly, if I alter the main to _start (since I don't want to be using main all the time), I have the following error from the buildrun script.





    ./buildrun myprogram



    /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: myprogram.o: in function _start': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of_start'; /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o:crtbegin.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o: in function _start_main': crtbegin.c:(.text+0x38): undefined reference tomain
    /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: crtbegin.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to main' clang-8: error: linker command failed with exit co
    de 1 (use -v to see invocation)
    ld: myprogram.o: in function
    _start': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of _start'; /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o:crtbegin.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here ld: /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o: in function_start_main': crtbegin.c:(.text+0x38): undefined reference to main'
    ld: crtbegin.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to
    main'





    How do I create programs with entry points other than main?



    I want to be able to :



    Create a statically linked executable that works.
    Create an executable that has a function named _start instead of main.
    Create a dynamically linked executable with an entry point other than main.
    Create an executable that uses supervisor call svc to exit without throwing an illegal instruction error as against using ret.



    Reference:



    https://thinkingeek.com/2013/01/09/arm-assembler-raspberry-pi-chapter-1/



    Check the comment by ehrt74 on the above post.










    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0








      Can you let me know what I'm doing wrong?

      I'm new to assembly programming and am unfamiliar with the various options in ld.



      I've been trying to use the yasm compiler initially but then realised that as is the way to go for the ARM architecture while composing GNU compliant assembly code.



      Better luck running as from the binutils package I. E.,the GNU assembler. But the assembly code has to be Arm-compliant.



      The following is the code within arm.s:



       .global main                      /* declares the main identifier */ 
      .type main , % function main : /* Address of the main function */
      /* Program code would go here */
      BR LR
      /* Return to the caller */
      .end /* End of the program */


      ARM, a RISC architecture, is not supported by YASM.



      My build file is as follows:



      #/usr/bin/env bash
      #display usage
      [ $# -eq 0 ] && { echo "Usage: $0 ";exit 1; }
      set +e
      rm -f $1.exe $1 $1.o
      as -o $1.o $1.s
      [ -e $1.o ] && { file $1.o;}
      gcc -s -o $1.exe $1.o -fpic
      ld -s -o $1 -pie --dynamic-linker /system/bin/linker64 /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o $1.o -lc -lgcc -ldl /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtend_android.o
      [ -e $1.exe ] && { file $1.exe;nohup ./$1.exe; }

      [ -e $1 ] && { file $1;nohup ./$1;}
      set -e



      The code was causing either a segmentation fault or a bus error earlier.



      I was able to run a program or two without any segmentation or bus errors with the updated build file above. I set up the build file to produce two executables, one using gcc and the other ld, since some online tutorials use ld instead of gcc for the linking step. Using the verbose setting of gcc, you can look at the options passed to the linker and thus mimic the same for the linker independently.



      There may be some redundant settings that I've missed.



      You can access updates to the source code and build file at
      Learn Assembly.



      Check out this resource from Keil here. arm Keil product guides



      More resources:



      https://thinkingeek.com/2016/10/08/exploring-aarch64-assembler-chapter1/



      https://stackoverflow.com/q/3577922/3924108



      While the above problem appears to be fixed for now, I have errors running the following code:



      .text .global main main: mov w0, #2 mov w7, #1 // request to exit program svc 0



      I obtain an illegal instruction error when I try to execute the code.



      Secondly, if I alter the main to _start (since I don't want to be using main all the time), I have the following error from the buildrun script.





      ./buildrun myprogram



      /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: myprogram.o: in function _start': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of_start'; /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o:crtbegin.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o: in function _start_main': crtbegin.c:(.text+0x38): undefined reference tomain
      /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: crtbegin.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to main' clang-8: error: linker command failed with exit co
      de 1 (use -v to see invocation)
      ld: myprogram.o: in function
      _start': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of _start'; /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o:crtbegin.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here ld: /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o: in function_start_main': crtbegin.c:(.text+0x38): undefined reference to main'
      ld: crtbegin.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to
      main'





      How do I create programs with entry points other than main?



      I want to be able to :



      Create a statically linked executable that works.
      Create an executable that has a function named _start instead of main.
      Create a dynamically linked executable with an entry point other than main.
      Create an executable that uses supervisor call svc to exit without throwing an illegal instruction error as against using ret.



      Reference:



      https://thinkingeek.com/2013/01/09/arm-assembler-raspberry-pi-chapter-1/



      Check the comment by ehrt74 on the above post.










      share|improve this question
















      Can you let me know what I'm doing wrong?

      I'm new to assembly programming and am unfamiliar with the various options in ld.



      I've been trying to use the yasm compiler initially but then realised that as is the way to go for the ARM architecture while composing GNU compliant assembly code.



      Better luck running as from the binutils package I. E.,the GNU assembler. But the assembly code has to be Arm-compliant.



      The following is the code within arm.s:



       .global main                      /* declares the main identifier */ 
      .type main , % function main : /* Address of the main function */
      /* Program code would go here */
      BR LR
      /* Return to the caller */
      .end /* End of the program */


      ARM, a RISC architecture, is not supported by YASM.



      My build file is as follows:



      #/usr/bin/env bash
      #display usage
      [ $# -eq 0 ] && { echo "Usage: $0 ";exit 1; }
      set +e
      rm -f $1.exe $1 $1.o
      as -o $1.o $1.s
      [ -e $1.o ] && { file $1.o;}
      gcc -s -o $1.exe $1.o -fpic
      ld -s -o $1 -pie --dynamic-linker /system/bin/linker64 /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o $1.o -lc -lgcc -ldl /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtend_android.o
      [ -e $1.exe ] && { file $1.exe;nohup ./$1.exe; }

      [ -e $1 ] && { file $1;nohup ./$1;}
      set -e



      The code was causing either a segmentation fault or a bus error earlier.



      I was able to run a program or two without any segmentation or bus errors with the updated build file above. I set up the build file to produce two executables, one using gcc and the other ld, since some online tutorials use ld instead of gcc for the linking step. Using the verbose setting of gcc, you can look at the options passed to the linker and thus mimic the same for the linker independently.



      There may be some redundant settings that I've missed.



      You can access updates to the source code and build file at
      Learn Assembly.



      Check out this resource from Keil here. arm Keil product guides



      More resources:



      https://thinkingeek.com/2016/10/08/exploring-aarch64-assembler-chapter1/



      https://stackoverflow.com/q/3577922/3924108



      While the above problem appears to be fixed for now, I have errors running the following code:



      .text .global main main: mov w0, #2 mov w7, #1 // request to exit program svc 0



      I obtain an illegal instruction error when I try to execute the code.



      Secondly, if I alter the main to _start (since I don't want to be using main all the time), I have the following error from the buildrun script.





      ./buildrun myprogram



      /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: myprogram.o: in function _start': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of_start'; /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o:crtbegin.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o: in function _start_main': crtbegin.c:(.text+0x38): undefined reference tomain
      /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: crtbegin.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to main' clang-8: error: linker command failed with exit co
      de 1 (use -v to see invocation)
      ld: myprogram.o: in function
      _start': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of _start'; /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o:crtbegin.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here ld: /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o: in function_start_main': crtbegin.c:(.text+0x38): undefined reference to main'
      ld: crtbegin.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to
      main'





      How do I create programs with entry points other than main?



      I want to be able to :



      Create a statically linked executable that works.
      Create an executable that has a function named _start instead of main.
      Create a dynamically linked executable with an entry point other than main.
      Create an executable that uses supervisor call svc to exit without throwing an illegal instruction error as against using ret.



      Reference:



      https://thinkingeek.com/2013/01/09/arm-assembler-raspberry-pi-chapter-1/



      Check the comment by ehrt74 on the above post.







      linux x86 assembly






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday







      fernal73

















      asked Apr 1 at 5:04









      fernal73fernal73

      11




      11






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Yasm is an x86 assembler. It cannot produce executables for an ARM processor.



          The tutorials you are working with are describing x86 assembly. They are intended to be followed on an x86 system.






          share|improve this answer
























          • I'm aware of that now. When I started out, I wasn't.

            – fernal73
            Apr 5 at 6:02











          • Yes, I can't find any quick start resources for the ARM V8 assembly language. You can check out my source from Git if you like to see what's the problem with my programs. I'm a newbie to assembly coding on any architecture. I feel I should first pick up assembly on one platform before venturing into fixing what's wrong on Termux. I'll need to get myself familiar with assembly programming first. Secondly, the resources listed for ARM will need to be cross referenced with any other programming resources in x86 format and then altered to run them on ARM. That's not a trivial exercise.

            – fernal73
            Apr 6 at 13:36











          • Arm has two variants of assembly language. UAL and GNU Assembly. Using as requires the latter.

            – fernal73
            Apr 6 at 13:37












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "3"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1419818%2fassembly-executable-on-termux-now-produces-illegal-instruction-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          Yasm is an x86 assembler. It cannot produce executables for an ARM processor.



          The tutorials you are working with are describing x86 assembly. They are intended to be followed on an x86 system.






          share|improve this answer
























          • I'm aware of that now. When I started out, I wasn't.

            – fernal73
            Apr 5 at 6:02











          • Yes, I can't find any quick start resources for the ARM V8 assembly language. You can check out my source from Git if you like to see what's the problem with my programs. I'm a newbie to assembly coding on any architecture. I feel I should first pick up assembly on one platform before venturing into fixing what's wrong on Termux. I'll need to get myself familiar with assembly programming first. Secondly, the resources listed for ARM will need to be cross referenced with any other programming resources in x86 format and then altered to run them on ARM. That's not a trivial exercise.

            – fernal73
            Apr 6 at 13:36











          • Arm has two variants of assembly language. UAL and GNU Assembly. Using as requires the latter.

            – fernal73
            Apr 6 at 13:37
















          0














          Yasm is an x86 assembler. It cannot produce executables for an ARM processor.



          The tutorials you are working with are describing x86 assembly. They are intended to be followed on an x86 system.






          share|improve this answer
























          • I'm aware of that now. When I started out, I wasn't.

            – fernal73
            Apr 5 at 6:02











          • Yes, I can't find any quick start resources for the ARM V8 assembly language. You can check out my source from Git if you like to see what's the problem with my programs. I'm a newbie to assembly coding on any architecture. I feel I should first pick up assembly on one platform before venturing into fixing what's wrong on Termux. I'll need to get myself familiar with assembly programming first. Secondly, the resources listed for ARM will need to be cross referenced with any other programming resources in x86 format and then altered to run them on ARM. That's not a trivial exercise.

            – fernal73
            Apr 6 at 13:36











          • Arm has two variants of assembly language. UAL and GNU Assembly. Using as requires the latter.

            – fernal73
            Apr 6 at 13:37














          0












          0








          0







          Yasm is an x86 assembler. It cannot produce executables for an ARM processor.



          The tutorials you are working with are describing x86 assembly. They are intended to be followed on an x86 system.






          share|improve this answer













          Yasm is an x86 assembler. It cannot produce executables for an ARM processor.



          The tutorials you are working with are describing x86 assembly. They are intended to be followed on an x86 system.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 5 at 2:30









          duskwuffduskwuff

          2,9791515




          2,9791515













          • I'm aware of that now. When I started out, I wasn't.

            – fernal73
            Apr 5 at 6:02











          • Yes, I can't find any quick start resources for the ARM V8 assembly language. You can check out my source from Git if you like to see what's the problem with my programs. I'm a newbie to assembly coding on any architecture. I feel I should first pick up assembly on one platform before venturing into fixing what's wrong on Termux. I'll need to get myself familiar with assembly programming first. Secondly, the resources listed for ARM will need to be cross referenced with any other programming resources in x86 format and then altered to run them on ARM. That's not a trivial exercise.

            – fernal73
            Apr 6 at 13:36











          • Arm has two variants of assembly language. UAL and GNU Assembly. Using as requires the latter.

            – fernal73
            Apr 6 at 13:37



















          • I'm aware of that now. When I started out, I wasn't.

            – fernal73
            Apr 5 at 6:02











          • Yes, I can't find any quick start resources for the ARM V8 assembly language. You can check out my source from Git if you like to see what's the problem with my programs. I'm a newbie to assembly coding on any architecture. I feel I should first pick up assembly on one platform before venturing into fixing what's wrong on Termux. I'll need to get myself familiar with assembly programming first. Secondly, the resources listed for ARM will need to be cross referenced with any other programming resources in x86 format and then altered to run them on ARM. That's not a trivial exercise.

            – fernal73
            Apr 6 at 13:36











          • Arm has two variants of assembly language. UAL and GNU Assembly. Using as requires the latter.

            – fernal73
            Apr 6 at 13:37

















          I'm aware of that now. When I started out, I wasn't.

          – fernal73
          Apr 5 at 6:02





          I'm aware of that now. When I started out, I wasn't.

          – fernal73
          Apr 5 at 6:02













          Yes, I can't find any quick start resources for the ARM V8 assembly language. You can check out my source from Git if you like to see what's the problem with my programs. I'm a newbie to assembly coding on any architecture. I feel I should first pick up assembly on one platform before venturing into fixing what's wrong on Termux. I'll need to get myself familiar with assembly programming first. Secondly, the resources listed for ARM will need to be cross referenced with any other programming resources in x86 format and then altered to run them on ARM. That's not a trivial exercise.

          – fernal73
          Apr 6 at 13:36





          Yes, I can't find any quick start resources for the ARM V8 assembly language. You can check out my source from Git if you like to see what's the problem with my programs. I'm a newbie to assembly coding on any architecture. I feel I should first pick up assembly on one platform before venturing into fixing what's wrong on Termux. I'll need to get myself familiar with assembly programming first. Secondly, the resources listed for ARM will need to be cross referenced with any other programming resources in x86 format and then altered to run them on ARM. That's not a trivial exercise.

          – fernal73
          Apr 6 at 13:36













          Arm has two variants of assembly language. UAL and GNU Assembly. Using as requires the latter.

          – fernal73
          Apr 6 at 13:37





          Arm has two variants of assembly language. UAL and GNU Assembly. Using as requires the latter.

          – fernal73
          Apr 6 at 13:37


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1419818%2fassembly-executable-on-termux-now-produces-illegal-instruction-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...

          Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Mirandela Referências Menu de...

          looking for continuous Screen Capture for retroactivly reproducing errors, timeback machineRolling desktop...