Assembly executable on Termux now produces Illegal instruction error The 2019 Stack Overflow...
How long do I have to send payment?
Should I use my personal or workplace e-mail when registering to external websites for work purpose?
"Riffle" two strings
What is the use of option -o in the useradd command?
Why is it "Tumoren" and not "Tumore"?
Should I write numbers in words or as numerals when there are multiple next to each other?
What can other administrators access on my machine?
Extreme, unacceptable situation and I can't attend work tomorrow morning
On the insanity of kings as an argument against monarchy
Limit the amount of RAM Mathematica may access?
Falsification in Math vs Science
Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?
What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?
I looked up a future colleague on LinkedIn before I started a job. I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?
What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation
How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?
How to deal with fear of taking dependencies
What do the Banks children have against barley water?
Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol
Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"
Inversion Puzzle
"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"
Carnot-Caratheodory metric
Lethal sonic weapons
Assembly executable on Termux now produces Illegal instruction error
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat are the meanings of /usr/sbin, /usr/local/sbin and /usr/local/bin?gcc running out of memory in Ubuntu 12.10Uninstall gcc from sourcegcc --as-needed linker flag not workingUnable to move MySQL data to external driveWhat happens when assembly code is translated into Object code?scs2ascii and SSLv2_client_method errors while running the make command during the installation of tn5250 on Linux Ubuntu 16.04 LTSIllegal instruction [samba][nmbd][linux]What does each of the color palette entries change the color of?Why is the compiler adding an extra 'sxtw' instruction (resulting further in a kernel panic)?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
Can you let me know what I'm doing wrong?
I'm new to assembly programming and am unfamiliar with the various options in ld
.
I've been trying to use the yasm
compiler initially but then realised that as is the way to go for the ARM architecture while composing GNU compliant assembly code.
Better luck running as
from the binutils
package I. E.,the GNU assembler. But the assembly code has to be Arm-compliant.
The following is the code within arm.s
:
.global main /* declares the main identifier */
.type main , % function main : /* Address of the main function */
/* Program code would go here */
BR LR
/* Return to the caller */
.end /* End of the program */
ARM, a RISC architecture, is not supported by YASM.
My build file is as follows:
#/usr/bin/env bash
#display usage
[ $# -eq 0 ] && { echo "Usage: $0 ";exit 1; }
set +e
rm -f $1.exe $1 $1.o
as -o $1.o $1.s
[ -e $1.o ] && { file $1.o;}
gcc -s -o $1.exe $1.o -fpic
ld -s -o $1 -pie --dynamic-linker /system/bin/linker64 /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o $1.o -lc -lgcc -ldl /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtend_android.o
[ -e $1.exe ] && { file $1.exe;nohup ./$1.exe; }
[ -e $1 ] && { file $1;nohup ./$1;}
set -e
The code was causing either a segmentation fault or a bus error earlier.
I was able to run a program or two without any segmentation or bus errors with the updated build file above. I set up the build file to produce two executables, one using gcc and the other ld, since some online tutorials use ld instead of gcc for the linking step. Using the verbose setting of gcc, you can look at the options passed to the linker and thus mimic the same for the linker independently.
There may be some redundant settings that I've missed.
You can access updates to the source code and build file at
Learn Assembly.
Check out this resource from Keil here. arm Keil product guides
More resources:
https://thinkingeek.com/2016/10/08/exploring-aarch64-assembler-chapter1/
https://stackoverflow.com/q/3577922/3924108
While the above problem appears to be fixed for now, I have errors running the following code:
.text .global main main: mov w0, #2 mov w7, #1 // request to exit program svc 0
I obtain an illegal instruction error when I try to execute the code.
Secondly, if I alter the main to _start (since I don't want to be using main all the time), I have the following error from the buildrun script.
./buildrun myprogram
/data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: myprogram.o: in function _start': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of
_start'; /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o:crtbegin.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o: in function _start_main': crtbegin.c:(.text+0x38): undefined reference to
main
/data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: crtbegin.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to main' clang-8: error: linker command failed with exit co
_start': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of
de 1 (use -v to see invocation)
ld: myprogram.o: in function_start'; /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o:crtbegin.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here ld: /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o: in function
_start_main': crtbegin.c:(.text+0x38): undefined reference to main'
main'
ld: crtbegin.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to
How do I create programs with entry points other than main?
I want to be able to :
Create a statically linked executable that works.
Create an executable that has a function named _start instead of main.
Create a dynamically linked executable with an entry point other than main.
Create an executable that uses supervisor call svc
to exit without throwing an illegal instruction error as against using ret.
Reference:
https://thinkingeek.com/2013/01/09/arm-assembler-raspberry-pi-chapter-1/
Check the comment by ehrt74 on the above post.
linux x86 assembly
add a comment |
Can you let me know what I'm doing wrong?
I'm new to assembly programming and am unfamiliar with the various options in ld
.
I've been trying to use the yasm
compiler initially but then realised that as is the way to go for the ARM architecture while composing GNU compliant assembly code.
Better luck running as
from the binutils
package I. E.,the GNU assembler. But the assembly code has to be Arm-compliant.
The following is the code within arm.s
:
.global main /* declares the main identifier */
.type main , % function main : /* Address of the main function */
/* Program code would go here */
BR LR
/* Return to the caller */
.end /* End of the program */
ARM, a RISC architecture, is not supported by YASM.
My build file is as follows:
#/usr/bin/env bash
#display usage
[ $# -eq 0 ] && { echo "Usage: $0 ";exit 1; }
set +e
rm -f $1.exe $1 $1.o
as -o $1.o $1.s
[ -e $1.o ] && { file $1.o;}
gcc -s -o $1.exe $1.o -fpic
ld -s -o $1 -pie --dynamic-linker /system/bin/linker64 /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o $1.o -lc -lgcc -ldl /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtend_android.o
[ -e $1.exe ] && { file $1.exe;nohup ./$1.exe; }
[ -e $1 ] && { file $1;nohup ./$1;}
set -e
The code was causing either a segmentation fault or a bus error earlier.
I was able to run a program or two without any segmentation or bus errors with the updated build file above. I set up the build file to produce two executables, one using gcc and the other ld, since some online tutorials use ld instead of gcc for the linking step. Using the verbose setting of gcc, you can look at the options passed to the linker and thus mimic the same for the linker independently.
There may be some redundant settings that I've missed.
You can access updates to the source code and build file at
Learn Assembly.
Check out this resource from Keil here. arm Keil product guides
More resources:
https://thinkingeek.com/2016/10/08/exploring-aarch64-assembler-chapter1/
https://stackoverflow.com/q/3577922/3924108
While the above problem appears to be fixed for now, I have errors running the following code:
.text .global main main: mov w0, #2 mov w7, #1 // request to exit program svc 0
I obtain an illegal instruction error when I try to execute the code.
Secondly, if I alter the main to _start (since I don't want to be using main all the time), I have the following error from the buildrun script.
./buildrun myprogram
/data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: myprogram.o: in function _start': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of
_start'; /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o:crtbegin.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o: in function _start_main': crtbegin.c:(.text+0x38): undefined reference to
main
/data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: crtbegin.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to main' clang-8: error: linker command failed with exit co
_start': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of
de 1 (use -v to see invocation)
ld: myprogram.o: in function_start'; /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o:crtbegin.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here ld: /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o: in function
_start_main': crtbegin.c:(.text+0x38): undefined reference to main'
main'
ld: crtbegin.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to
How do I create programs with entry points other than main?
I want to be able to :
Create a statically linked executable that works.
Create an executable that has a function named _start instead of main.
Create a dynamically linked executable with an entry point other than main.
Create an executable that uses supervisor call svc
to exit without throwing an illegal instruction error as against using ret.
Reference:
https://thinkingeek.com/2013/01/09/arm-assembler-raspberry-pi-chapter-1/
Check the comment by ehrt74 on the above post.
linux x86 assembly
add a comment |
Can you let me know what I'm doing wrong?
I'm new to assembly programming and am unfamiliar with the various options in ld
.
I've been trying to use the yasm
compiler initially but then realised that as is the way to go for the ARM architecture while composing GNU compliant assembly code.
Better luck running as
from the binutils
package I. E.,the GNU assembler. But the assembly code has to be Arm-compliant.
The following is the code within arm.s
:
.global main /* declares the main identifier */
.type main , % function main : /* Address of the main function */
/* Program code would go here */
BR LR
/* Return to the caller */
.end /* End of the program */
ARM, a RISC architecture, is not supported by YASM.
My build file is as follows:
#/usr/bin/env bash
#display usage
[ $# -eq 0 ] && { echo "Usage: $0 ";exit 1; }
set +e
rm -f $1.exe $1 $1.o
as -o $1.o $1.s
[ -e $1.o ] && { file $1.o;}
gcc -s -o $1.exe $1.o -fpic
ld -s -o $1 -pie --dynamic-linker /system/bin/linker64 /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o $1.o -lc -lgcc -ldl /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtend_android.o
[ -e $1.exe ] && { file $1.exe;nohup ./$1.exe; }
[ -e $1 ] && { file $1;nohup ./$1;}
set -e
The code was causing either a segmentation fault or a bus error earlier.
I was able to run a program or two without any segmentation or bus errors with the updated build file above. I set up the build file to produce two executables, one using gcc and the other ld, since some online tutorials use ld instead of gcc for the linking step. Using the verbose setting of gcc, you can look at the options passed to the linker and thus mimic the same for the linker independently.
There may be some redundant settings that I've missed.
You can access updates to the source code and build file at
Learn Assembly.
Check out this resource from Keil here. arm Keil product guides
More resources:
https://thinkingeek.com/2016/10/08/exploring-aarch64-assembler-chapter1/
https://stackoverflow.com/q/3577922/3924108
While the above problem appears to be fixed for now, I have errors running the following code:
.text .global main main: mov w0, #2 mov w7, #1 // request to exit program svc 0
I obtain an illegal instruction error when I try to execute the code.
Secondly, if I alter the main to _start (since I don't want to be using main all the time), I have the following error from the buildrun script.
./buildrun myprogram
/data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: myprogram.o: in function _start': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of
_start'; /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o:crtbegin.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o: in function _start_main': crtbegin.c:(.text+0x38): undefined reference to
main
/data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: crtbegin.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to main' clang-8: error: linker command failed with exit co
_start': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of
de 1 (use -v to see invocation)
ld: myprogram.o: in function_start'; /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o:crtbegin.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here ld: /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o: in function
_start_main': crtbegin.c:(.text+0x38): undefined reference to main'
main'
ld: crtbegin.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to
How do I create programs with entry points other than main?
I want to be able to :
Create a statically linked executable that works.
Create an executable that has a function named _start instead of main.
Create a dynamically linked executable with an entry point other than main.
Create an executable that uses supervisor call svc
to exit without throwing an illegal instruction error as against using ret.
Reference:
https://thinkingeek.com/2013/01/09/arm-assembler-raspberry-pi-chapter-1/
Check the comment by ehrt74 on the above post.
linux x86 assembly
Can you let me know what I'm doing wrong?
I'm new to assembly programming and am unfamiliar with the various options in ld
.
I've been trying to use the yasm
compiler initially but then realised that as is the way to go for the ARM architecture while composing GNU compliant assembly code.
Better luck running as
from the binutils
package I. E.,the GNU assembler. But the assembly code has to be Arm-compliant.
The following is the code within arm.s
:
.global main /* declares the main identifier */
.type main , % function main : /* Address of the main function */
/* Program code would go here */
BR LR
/* Return to the caller */
.end /* End of the program */
ARM, a RISC architecture, is not supported by YASM.
My build file is as follows:
#/usr/bin/env bash
#display usage
[ $# -eq 0 ] && { echo "Usage: $0 ";exit 1; }
set +e
rm -f $1.exe $1 $1.o
as -o $1.o $1.s
[ -e $1.o ] && { file $1.o;}
gcc -s -o $1.exe $1.o -fpic
ld -s -o $1 -pie --dynamic-linker /system/bin/linker64 /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o $1.o -lc -lgcc -ldl /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtend_android.o
[ -e $1.exe ] && { file $1.exe;nohup ./$1.exe; }
[ -e $1 ] && { file $1;nohup ./$1;}
set -e
The code was causing either a segmentation fault or a bus error earlier.
I was able to run a program or two without any segmentation or bus errors with the updated build file above. I set up the build file to produce two executables, one using gcc and the other ld, since some online tutorials use ld instead of gcc for the linking step. Using the verbose setting of gcc, you can look at the options passed to the linker and thus mimic the same for the linker independently.
There may be some redundant settings that I've missed.
You can access updates to the source code and build file at
Learn Assembly.
Check out this resource from Keil here. arm Keil product guides
More resources:
https://thinkingeek.com/2016/10/08/exploring-aarch64-assembler-chapter1/
https://stackoverflow.com/q/3577922/3924108
While the above problem appears to be fixed for now, I have errors running the following code:
.text .global main main: mov w0, #2 mov w7, #1 // request to exit program svc 0
I obtain an illegal instruction error when I try to execute the code.
Secondly, if I alter the main to _start (since I don't want to be using main all the time), I have the following error from the buildrun script.
./buildrun myprogram
/data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: myprogram.o: in function _start': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of
_start'; /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o:crtbegin.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o: in function _start_main': crtbegin.c:(.text+0x38): undefined reference to
main
/data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-android-ld: crtbegin.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to main' clang-8: error: linker command failed with exit co
_start': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of
de 1 (use -v to see invocation)
ld: myprogram.o: in function_start'; /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o:crtbegin.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here ld: /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/crtbegin_dynamic.o: in function
_start_main': crtbegin.c:(.text+0x38): undefined reference to main'
main'
ld: crtbegin.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to
How do I create programs with entry points other than main?
I want to be able to :
Create a statically linked executable that works.
Create an executable that has a function named _start instead of main.
Create a dynamically linked executable with an entry point other than main.
Create an executable that uses supervisor call svc
to exit without throwing an illegal instruction error as against using ret.
Reference:
https://thinkingeek.com/2013/01/09/arm-assembler-raspberry-pi-chapter-1/
Check the comment by ehrt74 on the above post.
linux x86 assembly
linux x86 assembly
edited yesterday
fernal73
asked Apr 1 at 5:04
fernal73fernal73
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Yasm is an x86 assembler. It cannot produce executables for an ARM processor.
The tutorials you are working with are describing x86 assembly. They are intended to be followed on an x86 system.
I'm aware of that now. When I started out, I wasn't.
– fernal73
Apr 5 at 6:02
Yes, I can't find any quick start resources for the ARM V8 assembly language. You can check out my source from Git if you like to see what's the problem with my programs. I'm a newbie to assembly coding on any architecture. I feel I should first pick up assembly on one platform before venturing into fixing what's wrong on Termux. I'll need to get myself familiar with assembly programming first. Secondly, the resources listed for ARM will need to be cross referenced with any other programming resources in x86 format and then altered to run them on ARM. That's not a trivial exercise.
– fernal73
Apr 6 at 13:36
Arm has two variants of assembly language. UAL and GNU Assembly. Using as requires the latter.
– fernal73
Apr 6 at 13:37
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1419818%2fassembly-executable-on-termux-now-produces-illegal-instruction-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yasm is an x86 assembler. It cannot produce executables for an ARM processor.
The tutorials you are working with are describing x86 assembly. They are intended to be followed on an x86 system.
I'm aware of that now. When I started out, I wasn't.
– fernal73
Apr 5 at 6:02
Yes, I can't find any quick start resources for the ARM V8 assembly language. You can check out my source from Git if you like to see what's the problem with my programs. I'm a newbie to assembly coding on any architecture. I feel I should first pick up assembly on one platform before venturing into fixing what's wrong on Termux. I'll need to get myself familiar with assembly programming first. Secondly, the resources listed for ARM will need to be cross referenced with any other programming resources in x86 format and then altered to run them on ARM. That's not a trivial exercise.
– fernal73
Apr 6 at 13:36
Arm has two variants of assembly language. UAL and GNU Assembly. Using as requires the latter.
– fernal73
Apr 6 at 13:37
add a comment |
Yasm is an x86 assembler. It cannot produce executables for an ARM processor.
The tutorials you are working with are describing x86 assembly. They are intended to be followed on an x86 system.
I'm aware of that now. When I started out, I wasn't.
– fernal73
Apr 5 at 6:02
Yes, I can't find any quick start resources for the ARM V8 assembly language. You can check out my source from Git if you like to see what's the problem with my programs. I'm a newbie to assembly coding on any architecture. I feel I should first pick up assembly on one platform before venturing into fixing what's wrong on Termux. I'll need to get myself familiar with assembly programming first. Secondly, the resources listed for ARM will need to be cross referenced with any other programming resources in x86 format and then altered to run them on ARM. That's not a trivial exercise.
– fernal73
Apr 6 at 13:36
Arm has two variants of assembly language. UAL and GNU Assembly. Using as requires the latter.
– fernal73
Apr 6 at 13:37
add a comment |
Yasm is an x86 assembler. It cannot produce executables for an ARM processor.
The tutorials you are working with are describing x86 assembly. They are intended to be followed on an x86 system.
Yasm is an x86 assembler. It cannot produce executables for an ARM processor.
The tutorials you are working with are describing x86 assembly. They are intended to be followed on an x86 system.
answered Apr 5 at 2:30
duskwuffduskwuff
2,9791515
2,9791515
I'm aware of that now. When I started out, I wasn't.
– fernal73
Apr 5 at 6:02
Yes, I can't find any quick start resources for the ARM V8 assembly language. You can check out my source from Git if you like to see what's the problem with my programs. I'm a newbie to assembly coding on any architecture. I feel I should first pick up assembly on one platform before venturing into fixing what's wrong on Termux. I'll need to get myself familiar with assembly programming first. Secondly, the resources listed for ARM will need to be cross referenced with any other programming resources in x86 format and then altered to run them on ARM. That's not a trivial exercise.
– fernal73
Apr 6 at 13:36
Arm has two variants of assembly language. UAL and GNU Assembly. Using as requires the latter.
– fernal73
Apr 6 at 13:37
add a comment |
I'm aware of that now. When I started out, I wasn't.
– fernal73
Apr 5 at 6:02
Yes, I can't find any quick start resources for the ARM V8 assembly language. You can check out my source from Git if you like to see what's the problem with my programs. I'm a newbie to assembly coding on any architecture. I feel I should first pick up assembly on one platform before venturing into fixing what's wrong on Termux. I'll need to get myself familiar with assembly programming first. Secondly, the resources listed for ARM will need to be cross referenced with any other programming resources in x86 format and then altered to run them on ARM. That's not a trivial exercise.
– fernal73
Apr 6 at 13:36
Arm has two variants of assembly language. UAL and GNU Assembly. Using as requires the latter.
– fernal73
Apr 6 at 13:37
I'm aware of that now. When I started out, I wasn't.
– fernal73
Apr 5 at 6:02
I'm aware of that now. When I started out, I wasn't.
– fernal73
Apr 5 at 6:02
Yes, I can't find any quick start resources for the ARM V8 assembly language. You can check out my source from Git if you like to see what's the problem with my programs. I'm a newbie to assembly coding on any architecture. I feel I should first pick up assembly on one platform before venturing into fixing what's wrong on Termux. I'll need to get myself familiar with assembly programming first. Secondly, the resources listed for ARM will need to be cross referenced with any other programming resources in x86 format and then altered to run them on ARM. That's not a trivial exercise.
– fernal73
Apr 6 at 13:36
Yes, I can't find any quick start resources for the ARM V8 assembly language. You can check out my source from Git if you like to see what's the problem with my programs. I'm a newbie to assembly coding on any architecture. I feel I should first pick up assembly on one platform before venturing into fixing what's wrong on Termux. I'll need to get myself familiar with assembly programming first. Secondly, the resources listed for ARM will need to be cross referenced with any other programming resources in x86 format and then altered to run them on ARM. That's not a trivial exercise.
– fernal73
Apr 6 at 13:36
Arm has two variants of assembly language. UAL and GNU Assembly. Using as requires the latter.
– fernal73
Apr 6 at 13:37
Arm has two variants of assembly language. UAL and GNU Assembly. Using as requires the latter.
– fernal73
Apr 6 at 13:37
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1419818%2fassembly-executable-on-termux-now-produces-illegal-instruction-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown