Why does apt-get install python3 with a trailing hyphen remove a lot of packages? [duplicate] ...
How was Skylab's orbit inclination chosen?
Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol
Does light intensity oscillate really fast since it is a wave?
Why is my p-value correlated to difference between means in two sample tests?
The difference between dialogue marks
Where to refill my bottle in India?
On the insanity of kings as an argument against monarchy
"What time...?" or "At what time...?" - what is more grammatically correct?
What is the best strategy for white in this position?
Manuscript was "unsubmitted" because the manuscript was deposited in Arxiv Preprints
Are USB sockets on wall outlets live all the time, even when the switch is off?
How can I create a character who can assume the widest possible range of creature sizes?
Why is the maximum length of openwrt’s root password 8 characters?
"Riffle" two strings
Inversion Puzzle
In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?
Understanding the implication of what "well-defined" means for the operation in quotient group
Could JWST stay at L2 "forever"?
Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"
Why Did Howard Stark Use All The Vibranium They Had On A Prototype Shield?
Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed
Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?
Why could you hear an Amstrad CPC working?
How to manage monthly salary
Why does apt-get install python3 with a trailing hyphen remove a lot of packages? [duplicate]
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inapt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on itWhy does `apt-get install python-` remove everything?Default path changed after uninstalling python and reinstalling ubuntu-desktopPackages are removed when I use “apt-get install” with a hyphen after the package nameMust execute “sudo su” and then do apt-get update/upgrade/install, prefacing with sudo doesn't workRedirected OutputThe colors when doing “ls” at my ubuntu server diappeared just like thatapt-get remove indicator-bluetooth removes lot of packagesWhy does “sudo apt-get install gpsd” return with errors?How to restore after accidentally apt-get remove python'sudo apt autoremove python3' removed a lot of packages
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
This question already has an answer here:
apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages
2 answers
“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]
2 answers
While is was installing something with the sudo apt-get install
command I accidentally accepted the command
sudo apt-get install python3-
(yeah I know it is stupid to just accept this but I did a lot of those and i just continued to click y
).
By executing the command I deleted my whole visual desktop of Ubuntu (I just had the plain shell but I recovered the visual desktop by now). I don't know if I am just stupid but nevertheless I want to create awareness that you shouldn't use the command.
If you can explain to me why happened what happened feel free to explain it to me.
command-line apt
New contributor
marked as duplicate by pomsky, karel, Zanna
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
yesterday
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages
2 answers
“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]
2 answers
While is was installing something with the sudo apt-get install
command I accidentally accepted the command
sudo apt-get install python3-
(yeah I know it is stupid to just accept this but I did a lot of those and i just continued to click y
).
By executing the command I deleted my whole visual desktop of Ubuntu (I just had the plain shell but I recovered the visual desktop by now). I don't know if I am just stupid but nevertheless I want to create awareness that you shouldn't use the command.
If you can explain to me why happened what happened feel free to explain it to me.
command-line apt
New contributor
marked as duplicate by pomsky, karel, Zanna
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
yesterday
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
8
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
2 days ago
2
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
yesterday
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand typesinstall
anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.
– Giacomo Alzetta
yesterday
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages
2 answers
“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]
2 answers
While is was installing something with the sudo apt-get install
command I accidentally accepted the command
sudo apt-get install python3-
(yeah I know it is stupid to just accept this but I did a lot of those and i just continued to click y
).
By executing the command I deleted my whole visual desktop of Ubuntu (I just had the plain shell but I recovered the visual desktop by now). I don't know if I am just stupid but nevertheless I want to create awareness that you shouldn't use the command.
If you can explain to me why happened what happened feel free to explain it to me.
command-line apt
New contributor
This question already has an answer here:
apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages
2 answers
“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]
2 answers
While is was installing something with the sudo apt-get install
command I accidentally accepted the command
sudo apt-get install python3-
(yeah I know it is stupid to just accept this but I did a lot of those and i just continued to click y
).
By executing the command I deleted my whole visual desktop of Ubuntu (I just had the plain shell but I recovered the visual desktop by now). I don't know if I am just stupid but nevertheless I want to create awareness that you shouldn't use the command.
If you can explain to me why happened what happened feel free to explain it to me.
This question already has an answer here:
apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages
2 answers
“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]
2 answers
command-line apt
command-line apt
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
Community♦
1
1
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
Mettigel4_1Mettigel4_1
471
471
New contributor
New contributor
marked as duplicate by pomsky, karel, Zanna
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
yesterday
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by pomsky, karel, Zanna
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
yesterday
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
8
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
2 days ago
2
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
yesterday
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand typesinstall
anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.
– Giacomo Alzetta
yesterday
add a comment |
8
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
2 days ago
2
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
yesterday
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand typesinstall
anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.
– Giacomo Alzetta
yesterday
8
8
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
2 days ago
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
2 days ago
2
2
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
yesterday
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
yesterday
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand types
install
anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.– Giacomo Alzetta
yesterday
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand types
install
anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.– Giacomo Alzetta
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
This is not a bug; this is documented in the man
page. From man apt-get
's install
section1 (emphasis mine):
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.
So, when you did:
sudo apt-get install python3-
you've removed the python3
package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).
Fix:
Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop
metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log
, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install
on them.
You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log
.
1 If you have less
as the man
pager, you can go to the install
section of man apt-get
directly:
LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get
6
It might be worth mentioning thatsudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).
– Henning Makholm
2 days ago
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
yesterday
add a comment |
No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get
:
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.
It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.
Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is not a bug; this is documented in the man
page. From man apt-get
's install
section1 (emphasis mine):
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.
So, when you did:
sudo apt-get install python3-
you've removed the python3
package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).
Fix:
Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop
metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log
, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install
on them.
You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log
.
1 If you have less
as the man
pager, you can go to the install
section of man apt-get
directly:
LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get
6
It might be worth mentioning thatsudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).
– Henning Makholm
2 days ago
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
yesterday
add a comment |
This is not a bug; this is documented in the man
page. From man apt-get
's install
section1 (emphasis mine):
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.
So, when you did:
sudo apt-get install python3-
you've removed the python3
package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).
Fix:
Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop
metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log
, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install
on them.
You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log
.
1 If you have less
as the man
pager, you can go to the install
section of man apt-get
directly:
LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get
6
It might be worth mentioning thatsudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).
– Henning Makholm
2 days ago
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
yesterday
add a comment |
This is not a bug; this is documented in the man
page. From man apt-get
's install
section1 (emphasis mine):
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.
So, when you did:
sudo apt-get install python3-
you've removed the python3
package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).
Fix:
Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop
metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log
, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install
on them.
You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log
.
1 If you have less
as the man
pager, you can go to the install
section of man apt-get
directly:
LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get
This is not a bug; this is documented in the man
page. From man apt-get
's install
section1 (emphasis mine):
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.
So, when you did:
sudo apt-get install python3-
you've removed the python3
package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).
Fix:
Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop
metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log
, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install
on them.
You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log
.
1 If you have less
as the man
pager, you can go to the install
section of man apt-get
directly:
LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
heemaylheemayl
68.2k11143215
68.2k11143215
6
It might be worth mentioning thatsudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).
– Henning Makholm
2 days ago
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
yesterday
add a comment |
6
It might be worth mentioning thatsudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).
– Henning Makholm
2 days ago
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
yesterday
6
6
It might be worth mentioning that
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).– Henning Makholm
2 days ago
It might be worth mentioning that
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).– Henning Makholm
2 days ago
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
yesterday
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
yesterday
add a comment |
No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get
:
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.
It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.
Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.
add a comment |
No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get
:
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.
It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.
Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.
add a comment |
No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get
:
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.
It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.
Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.
No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get
:
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.
It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.
Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.
edited 2 days ago
N0rbert
25.2k853118
25.2k853118
answered 2 days ago
vidarlovidarlo
10.7k52852
10.7k52852
add a comment |
add a comment |
8
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
2 days ago
2
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
yesterday
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand types
install
anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.– Giacomo Alzetta
yesterday