Windows XP and Windows 98 SE are very slow on VirtualBox run on Vista The 2019 Stack Overflow...
Is it safe to harvest rainwater that fell on solar panels?
Worn-tile Scrabble
Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?
What is preventing me from simply constructing a hash that's lower than the current target?
Ubuntu Server install with full GUI
Can I have a signal generator on while it's not connected?
Can an undergraduate be advised by a professor who is very far away?
What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation
Can there be female White Walkers?
What is this business jet?
A word that means fill it to the required quantity
How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure
How can I add encounters in the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign without giving PCs too much XP?
Falsification in Math vs Science
Likelihood that a superbug or lethal virus could come from a landfill
Old scifi movie from the 50s or 60s with men in solid red uniforms who interrogate a spy from the past
Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?
Does HR tell a hiring manager about salary negotiations?
Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed
Is bread bad for ducks?
Getting crown tickets for Statue of Liberty
Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?
Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?
Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)
Windows XP and Windows 98 SE are very slow on VirtualBox run on Vista
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InVirtualBox: Host OS processor is spiked while guest OS virtual processor is idle?VirtualBox - XP guest does not see multiple cores/multiple processorsKernel error when installing Linux MintVirtualbox Mac OSX host - Ubuntu guest is slow and laggyVirtualbox - Windows 7 x64 slow loadingWindows XP guest virtual machine: (vhd) Gives no display in Normal mode, Ok in safe modeVirtualBox is very slow in Windows 10Marshmallow in VirtualBox:installation stuck on GRUBVirtualbox: Win 7 x64 Professional Guest too slow on Win 10 hostMint 18.1 Cinnamon crashes when running in VirtualBox with 3D Acceleration Enabled
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I just installed Windows XP and Windows 98 on VirtualBox 3.2.12 r68302, which the VB is installed on Windows Vista Home Premium 32-bits, 4GB of RAM and 2GHz of processor.
Setting are as below:
Windows XP:
- Memory assigned: 768MB,
- Display memory: 64MB,
- Hard disk: 10GB (dynamic, the default),
- Processors: 2,
- Motherboard Extended features: Enabled IO APIC,
- Processor Extended features: Enable PAE/NX,
- Acceleration Hardware Virtualization: Enabled VT-x/AMD-V, Enabled Nested Paging.
Windows 98 SE:
- Memory assigned: 768MB,
- Display memory: 64MB,
- Hard disk: 10GB (dynamic, the default),
- Processor: 1,
- Motherboard Extended features: Disabled IO APIC,
- Processor Extended features: Disabled PAE/NX,
- Acceleration Hardware Virtualization: Disabled VT-x/AMD-V, Disabled Nested Paging.
Quite long ago in 2009 to 2011, I used to use VirtualBox since version 1.9 to 2.1, installed the same Windows XP and Windows 98, and also Ubuntu Linux, and there were never any problem. Mean, I am not new to VirtualBox. That VB was installed in the same Windows Vista and the laptop that I have right now.
Then my question is, what is the problem so now my two Windows are very slow on this VirtualBox? That VirtualBox I downloaded it from it official website.
Additional info:
At their time, I used to use Windows 98 SE with 100MHz processor and 16MB of RAM (and then 32MB), and it worked quite smooth. So did Windows XP with 1,5GHz processor and 256 of RAM (then 512MB), and it worked fine, smooth.
virtualbox
asked yesterday
AirCraft LoverAirCraft Lover
1034
add a comment |
I just installed Windows XP and Windows 98 on VirtualBox 3.2.12 r68302, which the VB is installed on Windows Vista Home Premium 32-bits, 4GB of RAM and 2GHz of processor.
Setting are as below:
Windows XP:
- Memory assigned: 768MB,
- Display memory: 64MB,
- Hard disk: 10GB (dynamic, the default),
- Processors: 2,
- Motherboard Extended features: Enabled IO APIC,
- Processor Extended features: Enable PAE/NX,
- Acceleration Hardware Virtualization: Enabled VT-x/AMD-V, Enabled Nested Paging.
Windows 98 SE:
- Memory assigned: 768MB,
- Display memory: 64MB,
- Hard disk: 10GB (dynamic, the default),
- Processor: 1,
- Motherboard Extended features: Disabled IO APIC,
- Processor Extended features: Disabled PAE/NX,
- Acceleration Hardware Virtualization: Disabled VT-x/AMD-V, Disabled Nested Paging.
Quite long ago in 2009 to 2011, I used to use VirtualBox since version 1.9 to 2.1, installed the same Windows XP and Windows 98, and also Ubuntu Linux, and there were never any problem. Mean, I am not new to VirtualBox. That VB was installed in the same Windows Vista and the laptop that I have right now.
Then my question is, what is the problem so now my two Windows are very slow on this VirtualBox? That VirtualBox I downloaded it from it official website.
Additional info:
At their time, I used to use Windows 98 SE with 100MHz processor and 16MB of RAM (and then 32MB), and it worked quite smooth. So did Windows XP with 1,5GHz processor and 256 of RAM (then 512MB), and it worked fine, smooth.
virtualbox
asked yesterday
AirCraft LoverAirCraft Lover
1034
What's the make of the host's processor? That way we can confirm if Nested Paging and VT-x are supported and available. And another thing: If your processor lacks support for Invalidate Process-Context Identifier (INVPCID)instructions, you're not going to get much in performance in your scenario.
– 林正浩
yesterday
It is Intel Core 2 Duo, Centrino Duo.
– AirCraft Lover
yesterday
The color of the Windows is only 16 colors, which supposed to be 16-bits.
– AirCraft Lover
17 hours ago
add a comment |
I just installed Windows XP and Windows 98 on VirtualBox 3.2.12 r68302, which the VB is installed on Windows Vista Home Premium 32-bits, 4GB of RAM and 2GHz of processor.
Setting are as below:
Windows XP:
- Memory assigned: 768MB,
- Display memory: 64MB,
- Hard disk: 10GB (dynamic, the default),
- Processors: 2,
- Motherboard Extended features: Enabled IO APIC,
- Processor Extended features: Enable PAE/NX,
- Acceleration Hardware Virtualization: Enabled VT-x/AMD-V, Enabled Nested Paging.
Windows 98 SE:
- Memory assigned: 768MB,
- Display memory: 64MB,
- Hard disk: 10GB (dynamic, the default),
- Processor: 1,
- Motherboard Extended features: Disabled IO APIC,
- Processor Extended features: Disabled PAE/NX,
- Acceleration Hardware Virtualization: Disabled VT-x/AMD-V, Disabled Nested Paging.
Quite long ago in 2009 to 2011, I used to use VirtualBox since version 1.9 to 2.1, installed the same Windows XP and Windows 98, and also Ubuntu Linux, and there were never any problem. Mean, I am not new to VirtualBox. That VB was installed in the same Windows Vista and the laptop that I have right now.
Then my question is, what is the problem so now my two Windows are very slow on this VirtualBox? That VirtualBox I downloaded it from it official website.
Additional info:
At their time, I used to use Windows 98 SE with 100MHz processor and 16MB of RAM (and then 32MB), and it worked quite smooth. So did Windows XP with 1,5GHz processor and 256 of RAM (then 512MB), and it worked fine, smooth.
virtualbox
asked yesterday
AirCraft LoverAirCraft Lover
1034
I just installed Windows XP and Windows 98 on VirtualBox 3.2.12 r68302, which the VB is installed on Windows Vista Home Premium 32-bits, 4GB of RAM and 2GHz of processor.
Setting are as below:
Windows XP:
- Memory assigned: 768MB,
- Display memory: 64MB,
- Hard disk: 10GB (dynamic, the default),
- Processors: 2,
- Motherboard Extended features: Enabled IO APIC,
- Processor Extended features: Enable PAE/NX,
- Acceleration Hardware Virtualization: Enabled VT-x/AMD-V, Enabled Nested Paging.
Windows 98 SE:
- Memory assigned: 768MB,
- Display memory: 64MB,
- Hard disk: 10GB (dynamic, the default),
- Processor: 1,
- Motherboard Extended features: Disabled IO APIC,
- Processor Extended features: Disabled PAE/NX,
- Acceleration Hardware Virtualization: Disabled VT-x/AMD-V, Disabled Nested Paging.
Quite long ago in 2009 to 2011, I used to use VirtualBox since version 1.9 to 2.1, installed the same Windows XP and Windows 98, and also Ubuntu Linux, and there were never any problem. Mean, I am not new to VirtualBox. That VB was installed in the same Windows Vista and the laptop that I have right now.
Then my question is, what is the problem so now my two Windows are very slow on this VirtualBox? That VirtualBox I downloaded it from it official website.
Additional info:
At their time, I used to use Windows 98 SE with 100MHz processor and 16MB of RAM (and then 32MB), and it worked quite smooth. So did Windows XP with 1,5GHz processor and 256 of RAM (then 512MB), and it worked fine, smooth.
virtualbox
virtualbox
asked yesterday
AirCraft LoverAirCraft Lover
1034
asked yesterday
AirCraft LoverAirCraft Lover
1034
asked yesterday
AirCraft LoverAirCraft Lover
1034
asked yesterday
AirCraft LoverAirCraft Lover
1034
asked yesterday
AirCraft LoverAirCraft Lover
1034
1034
What's the make of the host's processor? That way we can confirm if Nested Paging and VT-x are supported and available. And another thing: If your processor lacks support for Invalidate Process-Context Identifier (INVPCID)instructions, you're not going to get much in performance in your scenario.
– 林正浩
yesterday
It is Intel Core 2 Duo, Centrino Duo.
– AirCraft Lover
yesterday
The color of the Windows is only 16 colors, which supposed to be 16-bits.
– AirCraft Lover
17 hours ago
add a comment |
What's the make of the host's processor? That way we can confirm if Nested Paging and VT-x are supported and available. And another thing: If your processor lacks support for Invalidate Process-Context Identifier (INVPCID)instructions, you're not going to get much in performance in your scenario.
– 林正浩
yesterday
It is Intel Core 2 Duo, Centrino Duo.
– AirCraft Lover
yesterday
The color of the Windows is only 16 colors, which supposed to be 16-bits.
– AirCraft Lover
17 hours ago
What's the make of the host's processor? That way we can confirm if Nested Paging and VT-x are supported and available. And another thing: If your processor lacks support for Invalidate Process-Context Identifier (INVPCID)instructions, you're not going to get much in performance in your scenario.
– 林正浩
yesterday
What's the make of the host's processor? That way we can confirm if Nested Paging and VT-x are supported and available. And another thing: If your processor lacks support for Invalidate Process-Context Identifier (INVPCID)instructions, you're not going to get much in performance in your scenario.
– 林正浩
yesterday
It is Intel Core 2 Duo, Centrino Duo.
– AirCraft Lover
yesterday
It is Intel Core 2 Duo, Centrino Duo.
– AirCraft Lover
yesterday
The color of the Windows is only 16 colors, which supposed to be 16-bits.
– AirCraft Lover
17 hours ago
The color of the Windows is only 16 colors, which supposed to be 16-bits.
– AirCraft Lover
17 hours ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1423764%2fwindows-xp-and-windows-98-se-are-very-slow-on-virtualbox-run-on-vista%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1423764%2fwindows-xp-and-windows-98-se-are-very-slow-on-virtualbox-run-on-vista%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What's the make of the host's processor? That way we can confirm if Nested Paging and VT-x are supported and available. And another thing: If your processor lacks support for Invalidate Process-Context Identifier (INVPCID)instructions, you're not going to get much in performance in your scenario.
– 林正浩
yesterday
It is Intel Core 2 Duo, Centrino Duo.
– AirCraft Lover
yesterday
The color of the Windows is only 16 colors, which supposed to be 16-bits.
– AirCraft Lover
17 hours ago