USB drive format, NTFS vs. FAT32 The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InShould...
Why couldn't they take pictures of a closer black hole?
Likelihood that a superbug or lethal virus could come from a landfill
What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?
Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed
Is it a good practice to use a static variable in a Test Class and use that in the actual class instead of Test.isRunningTest()?
Is bread bad for ducks?
Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit
Did any laptop computers have a built-in 5 1/4 inch floppy drive?
Can I have a signal generator on while it's not connected?
Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?
How can I add encounters in the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign without giving PCs too much XP?
What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?
Is Cinnamon a desktop environment or a window manager? (Or both?)
Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?
Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?
Will it cause any balance problems to have PCs level up and gain the benefits of a long rest mid-fight?
Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?
Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation
Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?
Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?
What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic Wars mean?
Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?
Straighten subgroup lattice
What does もの mean in this sentence?
USB drive format, NTFS vs. FAT32
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InShould I format USB sticks and SD cards to FAT, FAT32, exFAT or NTFS? (Windows files, live Linux distributions)Convert NTFS to FAT32 without losing dataFormat an external hard disk to FAT32, only option showing is NTFSConverting FAT32 to NTFSCan Ubuntu Linux be installed on FAT32 or NTFS?Copy speed to usb flash drive very slow when partitioned as NTFSFormatting USB-stick to NTFS or FAT32“Convert” NTFS EFI partition to FAT32USB flash drive wont formatWhat allocation unit size to use when formatting a USB flash drive in FAT32?Format a USB Drive CDFS to NTFS
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
What are the pros and cons of formatting your USB drive in NTFS format or FAT32 format and vice versa?
Please highlight any advantages of one format over the other.
Keeping in mind I need to use the USB Flash drive on Ubuntu 13.04, Windows 7 and Windows XP.
windows ubuntu usb-flash-drive ntfs fat32
add a comment |
What are the pros and cons of formatting your USB drive in NTFS format or FAT32 format and vice versa?
Please highlight any advantages of one format over the other.
Keeping in mind I need to use the USB Flash drive on Ubuntu 13.04, Windows 7 and Windows XP.
windows ubuntu usb-flash-drive ntfs fat32
3
possible duplicate of Should I format USB sticks and SD cards to FAT, FAT32, exFAT or NTFS? (Windows files, live Linux distors)
– Scott Chamberlain
Aug 30 '13 at 15:50
The answer I find is too much technical, I need a simpler simpler reply as in comparison
– aibk01
Aug 30 '13 at 16:24
Fat32 il limited to 32Go not NTFS
– Michel Ayotte
yesterday
add a comment |
What are the pros and cons of formatting your USB drive in NTFS format or FAT32 format and vice versa?
Please highlight any advantages of one format over the other.
Keeping in mind I need to use the USB Flash drive on Ubuntu 13.04, Windows 7 and Windows XP.
windows ubuntu usb-flash-drive ntfs fat32
What are the pros and cons of formatting your USB drive in NTFS format or FAT32 format and vice versa?
Please highlight any advantages of one format over the other.
Keeping in mind I need to use the USB Flash drive on Ubuntu 13.04, Windows 7 and Windows XP.
windows ubuntu usb-flash-drive ntfs fat32
windows ubuntu usb-flash-drive ntfs fat32
edited Jan 22 '18 at 22:34
Peter Mortensen
8,401166185
8,401166185
asked Aug 30 '13 at 15:49
aibk01aibk01
82421021
82421021
3
possible duplicate of Should I format USB sticks and SD cards to FAT, FAT32, exFAT or NTFS? (Windows files, live Linux distors)
– Scott Chamberlain
Aug 30 '13 at 15:50
The answer I find is too much technical, I need a simpler simpler reply as in comparison
– aibk01
Aug 30 '13 at 16:24
Fat32 il limited to 32Go not NTFS
– Michel Ayotte
yesterday
add a comment |
3
possible duplicate of Should I format USB sticks and SD cards to FAT, FAT32, exFAT or NTFS? (Windows files, live Linux distors)
– Scott Chamberlain
Aug 30 '13 at 15:50
The answer I find is too much technical, I need a simpler simpler reply as in comparison
– aibk01
Aug 30 '13 at 16:24
Fat32 il limited to 32Go not NTFS
– Michel Ayotte
yesterday
3
3
possible duplicate of Should I format USB sticks and SD cards to FAT, FAT32, exFAT or NTFS? (Windows files, live Linux distors)
– Scott Chamberlain
Aug 30 '13 at 15:50
possible duplicate of Should I format USB sticks and SD cards to FAT, FAT32, exFAT or NTFS? (Windows files, live Linux distors)
– Scott Chamberlain
Aug 30 '13 at 15:50
The answer I find is too much technical, I need a simpler simpler reply as in comparison
– aibk01
Aug 30 '13 at 16:24
The answer I find is too much technical, I need a simpler simpler reply as in comparison
– aibk01
Aug 30 '13 at 16:24
Fat32 il limited to 32Go not NTFS
– Michel Ayotte
yesterday
Fat32 il limited to 32Go not NTFS
– Michel Ayotte
yesterday
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
NTFS (New Technology File System) is a proprietary file system developed by Microsoft Corporation, and hence you may have to install additional programs on Linux / Mac in order to view partitions formatted with
NTFS (like ntfs-3g).
FAT32 formatting is used to be recognised in all operating systems and there is a limit of 4 GB file in this case. I.e., you can't create a single file greater than 4 GB in FAT32 whereas you can create files larger than 4 GB in NTFS.
You can gain more insights via this link.
add a comment |
Well, I think it highly depends on the size and capacity of your flash drive, and what operating systems you want it to be supported by, and what security features you might require. As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity, and if you want all operating systems to easily support them. For more information you could refer to these articles:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat32#FAT32
http://cquirke.mvps.org/ntfs.htm
2
As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity
There’s plenty of old 1GB HDDs with NTFS, so what’s wrong with using it on a 32GB flash-drive? It’s not the size that’s the issue, it’s the “removability”.
– Synetech
Aug 30 '13 at 16:23
@Synetech : Thank you for reminding me that. It was truly kind of you.
– Jacob Rabinsun
Aug 30 '13 at 16:29
add a comment |
ExFAT as far as I can see it right now, doesn't allow for a bootable partition, those options are greyed out in Rufus 2.5 when I switch ExFAT.
Personally, I decided to go with GPT partition scheme and use NTFS. These posts are some years old, and other information made me believe, that Linux supports NTFS too now, so unless using the overly old Windows XP, there's imo no reason to use anything different than GPT and NTFS, and as said, multiple partitions are possible.
Good point. What about NTFS? I saw a difference between NTFS and FAT32 when I tried it.
– Peter Mortensen
Jan 23 '18 at 3:14
add a comment |
NTFS is a journaling file system, so it'll cause some wearout to the USB drive, somehow reducing the drive's life expectancy. It's now supported by all modern OSes, but some old Linux or MacOS PCs might need to install the ntfs-3g driver.
FAT32 is supported by all operating systems, but it has a maximum 4 GB file size limit.
So none of them are good for USB drives. exFAT is the most suitable one because it's specifically designed for flash drives and is now supported by (almost) all operating systems.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f638815%2fusb-drive-format-ntfs-vs-fat32%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
NTFS (New Technology File System) is a proprietary file system developed by Microsoft Corporation, and hence you may have to install additional programs on Linux / Mac in order to view partitions formatted with
NTFS (like ntfs-3g).
FAT32 formatting is used to be recognised in all operating systems and there is a limit of 4 GB file in this case. I.e., you can't create a single file greater than 4 GB in FAT32 whereas you can create files larger than 4 GB in NTFS.
You can gain more insights via this link.
add a comment |
NTFS (New Technology File System) is a proprietary file system developed by Microsoft Corporation, and hence you may have to install additional programs on Linux / Mac in order to view partitions formatted with
NTFS (like ntfs-3g).
FAT32 formatting is used to be recognised in all operating systems and there is a limit of 4 GB file in this case. I.e., you can't create a single file greater than 4 GB in FAT32 whereas you can create files larger than 4 GB in NTFS.
You can gain more insights via this link.
add a comment |
NTFS (New Technology File System) is a proprietary file system developed by Microsoft Corporation, and hence you may have to install additional programs on Linux / Mac in order to view partitions formatted with
NTFS (like ntfs-3g).
FAT32 formatting is used to be recognised in all operating systems and there is a limit of 4 GB file in this case. I.e., you can't create a single file greater than 4 GB in FAT32 whereas you can create files larger than 4 GB in NTFS.
You can gain more insights via this link.
NTFS (New Technology File System) is a proprietary file system developed by Microsoft Corporation, and hence you may have to install additional programs on Linux / Mac in order to view partitions formatted with
NTFS (like ntfs-3g).
FAT32 formatting is used to be recognised in all operating systems and there is a limit of 4 GB file in this case. I.e., you can't create a single file greater than 4 GB in FAT32 whereas you can create files larger than 4 GB in NTFS.
You can gain more insights via this link.
edited Jan 22 '18 at 22:37
Peter Mortensen
8,401166185
8,401166185
answered Aug 30 '13 at 16:17
AshildrAshildr
2,15442041
2,15442041
add a comment |
add a comment |
Well, I think it highly depends on the size and capacity of your flash drive, and what operating systems you want it to be supported by, and what security features you might require. As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity, and if you want all operating systems to easily support them. For more information you could refer to these articles:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat32#FAT32
http://cquirke.mvps.org/ntfs.htm
2
As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity
There’s plenty of old 1GB HDDs with NTFS, so what’s wrong with using it on a 32GB flash-drive? It’s not the size that’s the issue, it’s the “removability”.
– Synetech
Aug 30 '13 at 16:23
@Synetech : Thank you for reminding me that. It was truly kind of you.
– Jacob Rabinsun
Aug 30 '13 at 16:29
add a comment |
Well, I think it highly depends on the size and capacity of your flash drive, and what operating systems you want it to be supported by, and what security features you might require. As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity, and if you want all operating systems to easily support them. For more information you could refer to these articles:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat32#FAT32
http://cquirke.mvps.org/ntfs.htm
2
As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity
There’s plenty of old 1GB HDDs with NTFS, so what’s wrong with using it on a 32GB flash-drive? It’s not the size that’s the issue, it’s the “removability”.
– Synetech
Aug 30 '13 at 16:23
@Synetech : Thank you for reminding me that. It was truly kind of you.
– Jacob Rabinsun
Aug 30 '13 at 16:29
add a comment |
Well, I think it highly depends on the size and capacity of your flash drive, and what operating systems you want it to be supported by, and what security features you might require. As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity, and if you want all operating systems to easily support them. For more information you could refer to these articles:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat32#FAT32
http://cquirke.mvps.org/ntfs.htm
Well, I think it highly depends on the size and capacity of your flash drive, and what operating systems you want it to be supported by, and what security features you might require. As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity, and if you want all operating systems to easily support them. For more information you could refer to these articles:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat32#FAT32
http://cquirke.mvps.org/ntfs.htm
answered Aug 30 '13 at 15:57
Jacob RabinsunJacob Rabinsun
1889
1889
2
As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity
There’s plenty of old 1GB HDDs with NTFS, so what’s wrong with using it on a 32GB flash-drive? It’s not the size that’s the issue, it’s the “removability”.
– Synetech
Aug 30 '13 at 16:23
@Synetech : Thank you for reminding me that. It was truly kind of you.
– Jacob Rabinsun
Aug 30 '13 at 16:29
add a comment |
2
As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity
There’s plenty of old 1GB HDDs with NTFS, so what’s wrong with using it on a 32GB flash-drive? It’s not the size that’s the issue, it’s the “removability”.
– Synetech
Aug 30 '13 at 16:23
@Synetech : Thank you for reminding me that. It was truly kind of you.
– Jacob Rabinsun
Aug 30 '13 at 16:29
2
2
As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity
There’s plenty of old 1GB HDDs with NTFS, so what’s wrong with using it on a 32GB flash-drive? It’s not the size that’s the issue, it’s the “removability”.– Synetech
Aug 30 '13 at 16:23
As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity
There’s plenty of old 1GB HDDs with NTFS, so what’s wrong with using it on a 32GB flash-drive? It’s not the size that’s the issue, it’s the “removability”.– Synetech
Aug 30 '13 at 16:23
@Synetech : Thank you for reminding me that. It was truly kind of you.
– Jacob Rabinsun
Aug 30 '13 at 16:29
@Synetech : Thank you for reminding me that. It was truly kind of you.
– Jacob Rabinsun
Aug 30 '13 at 16:29
add a comment |
ExFAT as far as I can see it right now, doesn't allow for a bootable partition, those options are greyed out in Rufus 2.5 when I switch ExFAT.
Personally, I decided to go with GPT partition scheme and use NTFS. These posts are some years old, and other information made me believe, that Linux supports NTFS too now, so unless using the overly old Windows XP, there's imo no reason to use anything different than GPT and NTFS, and as said, multiple partitions are possible.
Good point. What about NTFS? I saw a difference between NTFS and FAT32 when I tried it.
– Peter Mortensen
Jan 23 '18 at 3:14
add a comment |
ExFAT as far as I can see it right now, doesn't allow for a bootable partition, those options are greyed out in Rufus 2.5 when I switch ExFAT.
Personally, I decided to go with GPT partition scheme and use NTFS. These posts are some years old, and other information made me believe, that Linux supports NTFS too now, so unless using the overly old Windows XP, there's imo no reason to use anything different than GPT and NTFS, and as said, multiple partitions are possible.
Good point. What about NTFS? I saw a difference between NTFS and FAT32 when I tried it.
– Peter Mortensen
Jan 23 '18 at 3:14
add a comment |
ExFAT as far as I can see it right now, doesn't allow for a bootable partition, those options are greyed out in Rufus 2.5 when I switch ExFAT.
Personally, I decided to go with GPT partition scheme and use NTFS. These posts are some years old, and other information made me believe, that Linux supports NTFS too now, so unless using the overly old Windows XP, there's imo no reason to use anything different than GPT and NTFS, and as said, multiple partitions are possible.
ExFAT as far as I can see it right now, doesn't allow for a bootable partition, those options are greyed out in Rufus 2.5 when I switch ExFAT.
Personally, I decided to go with GPT partition scheme and use NTFS. These posts are some years old, and other information made me believe, that Linux supports NTFS too now, so unless using the overly old Windows XP, there's imo no reason to use anything different than GPT and NTFS, and as said, multiple partitions are possible.
answered Oct 29 '15 at 18:12
Philip Plger SeraielPhilip Plger Seraiel
211
211
Good point. What about NTFS? I saw a difference between NTFS and FAT32 when I tried it.
– Peter Mortensen
Jan 23 '18 at 3:14
add a comment |
Good point. What about NTFS? I saw a difference between NTFS and FAT32 when I tried it.
– Peter Mortensen
Jan 23 '18 at 3:14
Good point. What about NTFS? I saw a difference between NTFS and FAT32 when I tried it.
– Peter Mortensen
Jan 23 '18 at 3:14
Good point. What about NTFS? I saw a difference between NTFS and FAT32 when I tried it.
– Peter Mortensen
Jan 23 '18 at 3:14
add a comment |
NTFS is a journaling file system, so it'll cause some wearout to the USB drive, somehow reducing the drive's life expectancy. It's now supported by all modern OSes, but some old Linux or MacOS PCs might need to install the ntfs-3g driver.
FAT32 is supported by all operating systems, but it has a maximum 4 GB file size limit.
So none of them are good for USB drives. exFAT is the most suitable one because it's specifically designed for flash drives and is now supported by (almost) all operating systems.
add a comment |
NTFS is a journaling file system, so it'll cause some wearout to the USB drive, somehow reducing the drive's life expectancy. It's now supported by all modern OSes, but some old Linux or MacOS PCs might need to install the ntfs-3g driver.
FAT32 is supported by all operating systems, but it has a maximum 4 GB file size limit.
So none of them are good for USB drives. exFAT is the most suitable one because it's specifically designed for flash drives and is now supported by (almost) all operating systems.
add a comment |
NTFS is a journaling file system, so it'll cause some wearout to the USB drive, somehow reducing the drive's life expectancy. It's now supported by all modern OSes, but some old Linux or MacOS PCs might need to install the ntfs-3g driver.
FAT32 is supported by all operating systems, but it has a maximum 4 GB file size limit.
So none of them are good for USB drives. exFAT is the most suitable one because it's specifically designed for flash drives and is now supported by (almost) all operating systems.
NTFS is a journaling file system, so it'll cause some wearout to the USB drive, somehow reducing the drive's life expectancy. It's now supported by all modern OSes, but some old Linux or MacOS PCs might need to install the ntfs-3g driver.
FAT32 is supported by all operating systems, but it has a maximum 4 GB file size limit.
So none of them are good for USB drives. exFAT is the most suitable one because it's specifically designed for flash drives and is now supported by (almost) all operating systems.
edited Jan 22 '18 at 22:39
Peter Mortensen
8,401166185
8,401166185
answered Sep 3 '13 at 1:23
phuclvphuclv
10.7k64297
10.7k64297
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f638815%2fusb-drive-format-ntfs-vs-fat32%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
possible duplicate of Should I format USB sticks and SD cards to FAT, FAT32, exFAT or NTFS? (Windows files, live Linux distors)
– Scott Chamberlain
Aug 30 '13 at 15:50
The answer I find is too much technical, I need a simpler simpler reply as in comparison
– aibk01
Aug 30 '13 at 16:24
Fat32 il limited to 32Go not NTFS
– Michel Ayotte
yesterday