USB drive format, NTFS vs. FAT32 The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InShould...

Why couldn't they take pictures of a closer black hole?

Likelihood that a superbug or lethal virus could come from a landfill

What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?

Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed

Is it a good practice to use a static variable in a Test Class and use that in the actual class instead of Test.isRunningTest()?

Is bread bad for ducks?

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit

Did any laptop computers have a built-in 5 1/4 inch floppy drive?

Can I have a signal generator on while it's not connected?

Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?

How can I add encounters in the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign without giving PCs too much XP?

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Is Cinnamon a desktop environment or a window manager? (Or both?)

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

Will it cause any balance problems to have PCs level up and gain the benefits of a long rest mid-fight?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic Wars mean?

Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?

Straighten subgroup lattice

What does もの mean in this sentence?



USB drive format, NTFS vs. FAT32



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InShould I format USB sticks and SD cards to FAT, FAT32, exFAT or NTFS? (Windows files, live Linux distributions)Convert NTFS to FAT32 without losing dataFormat an external hard disk to FAT32, only option showing is NTFSConverting FAT32 to NTFSCan Ubuntu Linux be installed on FAT32 or NTFS?Copy speed to usb flash drive very slow when partitioned as NTFSFormatting USB-stick to NTFS or FAT32“Convert” NTFS EFI partition to FAT32USB flash drive wont formatWhat allocation unit size to use when formatting a USB flash drive in FAT32?Format a USB Drive CDFS to NTFS





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







10















What are the pros and cons of formatting your USB drive in NTFS format or FAT32 format and vice versa?



Please highlight any advantages of one format over the other.



Keeping in mind I need to use the USB Flash drive on Ubuntu 13.04, Windows 7 and Windows XP.










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    possible duplicate of Should I format USB sticks and SD cards to FAT, FAT32, exFAT or NTFS? (Windows files, live Linux distors)

    – Scott Chamberlain
    Aug 30 '13 at 15:50











  • The answer I find is too much technical, I need a simpler simpler reply as in comparison

    – aibk01
    Aug 30 '13 at 16:24











  • Fat32 il limited to 32Go not NTFS

    – Michel Ayotte
    yesterday


















10















What are the pros and cons of formatting your USB drive in NTFS format or FAT32 format and vice versa?



Please highlight any advantages of one format over the other.



Keeping in mind I need to use the USB Flash drive on Ubuntu 13.04, Windows 7 and Windows XP.










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    possible duplicate of Should I format USB sticks and SD cards to FAT, FAT32, exFAT or NTFS? (Windows files, live Linux distors)

    – Scott Chamberlain
    Aug 30 '13 at 15:50











  • The answer I find is too much technical, I need a simpler simpler reply as in comparison

    – aibk01
    Aug 30 '13 at 16:24











  • Fat32 il limited to 32Go not NTFS

    – Michel Ayotte
    yesterday














10












10








10


1






What are the pros and cons of formatting your USB drive in NTFS format or FAT32 format and vice versa?



Please highlight any advantages of one format over the other.



Keeping in mind I need to use the USB Flash drive on Ubuntu 13.04, Windows 7 and Windows XP.










share|improve this question
















What are the pros and cons of formatting your USB drive in NTFS format or FAT32 format and vice versa?



Please highlight any advantages of one format over the other.



Keeping in mind I need to use the USB Flash drive on Ubuntu 13.04, Windows 7 and Windows XP.







windows ubuntu usb-flash-drive ntfs fat32






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 22 '18 at 22:34









Peter Mortensen

8,401166185




8,401166185










asked Aug 30 '13 at 15:49









aibk01aibk01

82421021




82421021








  • 3





    possible duplicate of Should I format USB sticks and SD cards to FAT, FAT32, exFAT or NTFS? (Windows files, live Linux distors)

    – Scott Chamberlain
    Aug 30 '13 at 15:50











  • The answer I find is too much technical, I need a simpler simpler reply as in comparison

    – aibk01
    Aug 30 '13 at 16:24











  • Fat32 il limited to 32Go not NTFS

    – Michel Ayotte
    yesterday














  • 3





    possible duplicate of Should I format USB sticks and SD cards to FAT, FAT32, exFAT or NTFS? (Windows files, live Linux distors)

    – Scott Chamberlain
    Aug 30 '13 at 15:50











  • The answer I find is too much technical, I need a simpler simpler reply as in comparison

    – aibk01
    Aug 30 '13 at 16:24











  • Fat32 il limited to 32Go not NTFS

    – Michel Ayotte
    yesterday








3




3





possible duplicate of Should I format USB sticks and SD cards to FAT, FAT32, exFAT or NTFS? (Windows files, live Linux distors)

– Scott Chamberlain
Aug 30 '13 at 15:50





possible duplicate of Should I format USB sticks and SD cards to FAT, FAT32, exFAT or NTFS? (Windows files, live Linux distors)

– Scott Chamberlain
Aug 30 '13 at 15:50













The answer I find is too much technical, I need a simpler simpler reply as in comparison

– aibk01
Aug 30 '13 at 16:24





The answer I find is too much technical, I need a simpler simpler reply as in comparison

– aibk01
Aug 30 '13 at 16:24













Fat32 il limited to 32Go not NTFS

– Michel Ayotte
yesterday





Fat32 il limited to 32Go not NTFS

– Michel Ayotte
yesterday










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















10














NTFS (New Technology File System) is a proprietary file system developed by Microsoft Corporation, and hence you may have to install additional programs on Linux / Mac in order to view partitions formatted with
NTFS (like ntfs-3g).



FAT32 formatting is used to be recognised in all operating systems and there is a limit of 4 GB file in this case. I.e., you can't create a single file greater than 4 GB in FAT32 whereas you can create files larger than 4 GB in NTFS.



You can gain more insights via this link.






share|improve this answer

































    4














    Well, I think it highly depends on the size and capacity of your flash drive, and what operating systems you want it to be supported by, and what security features you might require. As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity, and if you want all operating systems to easily support them. For more information you could refer to these articles:



    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat32#FAT32

    http://cquirke.mvps.org/ntfs.htm






    share|improve this answer



















    • 2





      As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity There’s plenty of old 1GB HDDs with NTFS, so what’s wrong with using it on a 32GB flash-drive? It’s not the size that’s the issue, it’s the “removability”.

      – Synetech
      Aug 30 '13 at 16:23











    • @Synetech : Thank you for reminding me that. It was truly kind of you.

      – Jacob Rabinsun
      Aug 30 '13 at 16:29





















    2














    ExFAT as far as I can see it right now, doesn't allow for a bootable partition, those options are greyed out in Rufus 2.5 when I switch ExFAT.



    Personally, I decided to go with GPT partition scheme and use NTFS. These posts are some years old, and other information made me believe, that Linux supports NTFS too now, so unless using the overly old Windows XP, there's imo no reason to use anything different than GPT and NTFS, and as said, multiple partitions are possible.






    share|improve this answer
























    • Good point. What about NTFS? I saw a difference between NTFS and FAT32 when I tried it.

      – Peter Mortensen
      Jan 23 '18 at 3:14



















    2














    NTFS is a journaling file system, so it'll cause some wearout to the USB drive, somehow reducing the drive's life expectancy. It's now supported by all modern OSes, but some old Linux or MacOS PCs might need to install the ntfs-3g driver.



    FAT32 is supported by all operating systems, but it has a maximum 4 GB file size limit.



    So none of them are good for USB drives. exFAT is the most suitable one because it's specifically designed for flash drives and is now supported by (almost) all operating systems.






    share|improve this answer


























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "3"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f638815%2fusb-drive-format-ntfs-vs-fat32%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      10














      NTFS (New Technology File System) is a proprietary file system developed by Microsoft Corporation, and hence you may have to install additional programs on Linux / Mac in order to view partitions formatted with
      NTFS (like ntfs-3g).



      FAT32 formatting is used to be recognised in all operating systems and there is a limit of 4 GB file in this case. I.e., you can't create a single file greater than 4 GB in FAT32 whereas you can create files larger than 4 GB in NTFS.



      You can gain more insights via this link.






      share|improve this answer






























        10














        NTFS (New Technology File System) is a proprietary file system developed by Microsoft Corporation, and hence you may have to install additional programs on Linux / Mac in order to view partitions formatted with
        NTFS (like ntfs-3g).



        FAT32 formatting is used to be recognised in all operating systems and there is a limit of 4 GB file in this case. I.e., you can't create a single file greater than 4 GB in FAT32 whereas you can create files larger than 4 GB in NTFS.



        You can gain more insights via this link.






        share|improve this answer




























          10












          10








          10







          NTFS (New Technology File System) is a proprietary file system developed by Microsoft Corporation, and hence you may have to install additional programs on Linux / Mac in order to view partitions formatted with
          NTFS (like ntfs-3g).



          FAT32 formatting is used to be recognised in all operating systems and there is a limit of 4 GB file in this case. I.e., you can't create a single file greater than 4 GB in FAT32 whereas you can create files larger than 4 GB in NTFS.



          You can gain more insights via this link.






          share|improve this answer















          NTFS (New Technology File System) is a proprietary file system developed by Microsoft Corporation, and hence you may have to install additional programs on Linux / Mac in order to view partitions formatted with
          NTFS (like ntfs-3g).



          FAT32 formatting is used to be recognised in all operating systems and there is a limit of 4 GB file in this case. I.e., you can't create a single file greater than 4 GB in FAT32 whereas you can create files larger than 4 GB in NTFS.



          You can gain more insights via this link.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jan 22 '18 at 22:37









          Peter Mortensen

          8,401166185




          8,401166185










          answered Aug 30 '13 at 16:17









          AshildrAshildr

          2,15442041




          2,15442041

























              4














              Well, I think it highly depends on the size and capacity of your flash drive, and what operating systems you want it to be supported by, and what security features you might require. As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity, and if you want all operating systems to easily support them. For more information you could refer to these articles:



              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat32#FAT32

              http://cquirke.mvps.org/ntfs.htm






              share|improve this answer



















              • 2





                As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity There’s plenty of old 1GB HDDs with NTFS, so what’s wrong with using it on a 32GB flash-drive? It’s not the size that’s the issue, it’s the “removability”.

                – Synetech
                Aug 30 '13 at 16:23











              • @Synetech : Thank you for reminding me that. It was truly kind of you.

                – Jacob Rabinsun
                Aug 30 '13 at 16:29


















              4














              Well, I think it highly depends on the size and capacity of your flash drive, and what operating systems you want it to be supported by, and what security features you might require. As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity, and if you want all operating systems to easily support them. For more information you could refer to these articles:



              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat32#FAT32

              http://cquirke.mvps.org/ntfs.htm






              share|improve this answer



















              • 2





                As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity There’s plenty of old 1GB HDDs with NTFS, so what’s wrong with using it on a 32GB flash-drive? It’s not the size that’s the issue, it’s the “removability”.

                – Synetech
                Aug 30 '13 at 16:23











              • @Synetech : Thank you for reminding me that. It was truly kind of you.

                – Jacob Rabinsun
                Aug 30 '13 at 16:29
















              4












              4








              4







              Well, I think it highly depends on the size and capacity of your flash drive, and what operating systems you want it to be supported by, and what security features you might require. As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity, and if you want all operating systems to easily support them. For more information you could refer to these articles:



              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat32#FAT32

              http://cquirke.mvps.org/ntfs.htm






              share|improve this answer













              Well, I think it highly depends on the size and capacity of your flash drive, and what operating systems you want it to be supported by, and what security features you might require. As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity, and if you want all operating systems to easily support them. For more information you could refer to these articles:



              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat32#FAT32

              http://cquirke.mvps.org/ntfs.htm







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Aug 30 '13 at 15:57









              Jacob RabinsunJacob Rabinsun

              1889




              1889








              • 2





                As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity There’s plenty of old 1GB HDDs with NTFS, so what’s wrong with using it on a 32GB flash-drive? It’s not the size that’s the issue, it’s the “removability”.

                – Synetech
                Aug 30 '13 at 16:23











              • @Synetech : Thank you for reminding me that. It was truly kind of you.

                – Jacob Rabinsun
                Aug 30 '13 at 16:29
















              • 2





                As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity There’s plenty of old 1GB HDDs with NTFS, so what’s wrong with using it on a 32GB flash-drive? It’s not the size that’s the issue, it’s the “removability”.

                – Synetech
                Aug 30 '13 at 16:23











              • @Synetech : Thank you for reminding me that. It was truly kind of you.

                – Jacob Rabinsun
                Aug 30 '13 at 16:29










              2




              2





              As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity There’s plenty of old 1GB HDDs with NTFS, so what’s wrong with using it on a 32GB flash-drive? It’s not the size that’s the issue, it’s the “removability”.

              – Synetech
              Aug 30 '13 at 16:23





              As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity There’s plenty of old 1GB HDDs with NTFS, so what’s wrong with using it on a 32GB flash-drive? It’s not the size that’s the issue, it’s the “removability”.

              – Synetech
              Aug 30 '13 at 16:23













              @Synetech : Thank you for reminding me that. It was truly kind of you.

              – Jacob Rabinsun
              Aug 30 '13 at 16:29







              @Synetech : Thank you for reminding me that. It was truly kind of you.

              – Jacob Rabinsun
              Aug 30 '13 at 16:29













              2














              ExFAT as far as I can see it right now, doesn't allow for a bootable partition, those options are greyed out in Rufus 2.5 when I switch ExFAT.



              Personally, I decided to go with GPT partition scheme and use NTFS. These posts are some years old, and other information made me believe, that Linux supports NTFS too now, so unless using the overly old Windows XP, there's imo no reason to use anything different than GPT and NTFS, and as said, multiple partitions are possible.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Good point. What about NTFS? I saw a difference between NTFS and FAT32 when I tried it.

                – Peter Mortensen
                Jan 23 '18 at 3:14
















              2














              ExFAT as far as I can see it right now, doesn't allow for a bootable partition, those options are greyed out in Rufus 2.5 when I switch ExFAT.



              Personally, I decided to go with GPT partition scheme and use NTFS. These posts are some years old, and other information made me believe, that Linux supports NTFS too now, so unless using the overly old Windows XP, there's imo no reason to use anything different than GPT and NTFS, and as said, multiple partitions are possible.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Good point. What about NTFS? I saw a difference between NTFS and FAT32 when I tried it.

                – Peter Mortensen
                Jan 23 '18 at 3:14














              2












              2








              2







              ExFAT as far as I can see it right now, doesn't allow for a bootable partition, those options are greyed out in Rufus 2.5 when I switch ExFAT.



              Personally, I decided to go with GPT partition scheme and use NTFS. These posts are some years old, and other information made me believe, that Linux supports NTFS too now, so unless using the overly old Windows XP, there's imo no reason to use anything different than GPT and NTFS, and as said, multiple partitions are possible.






              share|improve this answer













              ExFAT as far as I can see it right now, doesn't allow for a bootable partition, those options are greyed out in Rufus 2.5 when I switch ExFAT.



              Personally, I decided to go with GPT partition scheme and use NTFS. These posts are some years old, and other information made me believe, that Linux supports NTFS too now, so unless using the overly old Windows XP, there's imo no reason to use anything different than GPT and NTFS, and as said, multiple partitions are possible.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Oct 29 '15 at 18:12









              Philip Plger SeraielPhilip Plger Seraiel

              211




              211













              • Good point. What about NTFS? I saw a difference between NTFS and FAT32 when I tried it.

                – Peter Mortensen
                Jan 23 '18 at 3:14



















              • Good point. What about NTFS? I saw a difference between NTFS and FAT32 when I tried it.

                – Peter Mortensen
                Jan 23 '18 at 3:14

















              Good point. What about NTFS? I saw a difference between NTFS and FAT32 when I tried it.

              – Peter Mortensen
              Jan 23 '18 at 3:14





              Good point. What about NTFS? I saw a difference between NTFS and FAT32 when I tried it.

              – Peter Mortensen
              Jan 23 '18 at 3:14











              2














              NTFS is a journaling file system, so it'll cause some wearout to the USB drive, somehow reducing the drive's life expectancy. It's now supported by all modern OSes, but some old Linux or MacOS PCs might need to install the ntfs-3g driver.



              FAT32 is supported by all operating systems, but it has a maximum 4 GB file size limit.



              So none of them are good for USB drives. exFAT is the most suitable one because it's specifically designed for flash drives and is now supported by (almost) all operating systems.






              share|improve this answer






























                2














                NTFS is a journaling file system, so it'll cause some wearout to the USB drive, somehow reducing the drive's life expectancy. It's now supported by all modern OSes, but some old Linux or MacOS PCs might need to install the ntfs-3g driver.



                FAT32 is supported by all operating systems, but it has a maximum 4 GB file size limit.



                So none of them are good for USB drives. exFAT is the most suitable one because it's specifically designed for flash drives and is now supported by (almost) all operating systems.






                share|improve this answer




























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  NTFS is a journaling file system, so it'll cause some wearout to the USB drive, somehow reducing the drive's life expectancy. It's now supported by all modern OSes, but some old Linux or MacOS PCs might need to install the ntfs-3g driver.



                  FAT32 is supported by all operating systems, but it has a maximum 4 GB file size limit.



                  So none of them are good for USB drives. exFAT is the most suitable one because it's specifically designed for flash drives and is now supported by (almost) all operating systems.






                  share|improve this answer















                  NTFS is a journaling file system, so it'll cause some wearout to the USB drive, somehow reducing the drive's life expectancy. It's now supported by all modern OSes, but some old Linux or MacOS PCs might need to install the ntfs-3g driver.



                  FAT32 is supported by all operating systems, but it has a maximum 4 GB file size limit.



                  So none of them are good for USB drives. exFAT is the most suitable one because it's specifically designed for flash drives and is now supported by (almost) all operating systems.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 22 '18 at 22:39









                  Peter Mortensen

                  8,401166185




                  8,401166185










                  answered Sep 3 '13 at 1:23









                  phuclvphuclv

                  10.7k64297




                  10.7k64297






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f638815%2fusb-drive-format-ntfs-vs-fat32%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...

                      Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Mirandela Referências Menu de...

                      looking for continuous Screen Capture for retroactivly reproducing errors, timeback machineRolling desktop...