Finding the solution set for a quadratic inequality $x^2-2<frac{7}{2}x$ The 2019 Stack...
How do PCB vias affect signal quality?
Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?
Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?
Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?
What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?
How can I define good in a religion that claims no moral authority?
What's the name of these plastic connectors
How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure
How can I add encounters in the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign without giving PCs too much XP?
Geography at the pixel level
How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?
Worn-tile Scrabble
How to obtain a position of last non-zero element
Can a flute soloist sit?
How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?
Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?
Can there be female White Walkers?
Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?
How to translate "being like"?
What is preventing me from simply constructing a hash that's lower than the current target?
I am an eight letter word. What am I?
How do I free up internal storage if I don't have any apps downloaded?
Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?
Star Trek - X-shaped Item on Regula/Orbital Office Starbases
Finding the solution set for a quadratic inequality $x^2-2
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InFinding all solutions to an inequality equationMultiple solutions for quadratic equation condition.Unable to figure out why the solution to a quadratic inequality worksIf $alpha$ , $beta$ are roots of the quadratic equation $x^2 -2p(x-4) -15 = 0$ , then answer the following .How to treat nested absolute value-equations?The equation $2x^2-2(2a+1)x+a^2+a=0$ has one root less than $a$ and other root greater than $a$,ifWhat are the values of $a$, one of the roots of the equation is greater than $1$ and the other is less than $1$?Quadratic inequality where $xinmathbb{R}$Solving quadratic inequality to get the final answerHow to find the number of roots for a constant in a quadratic equation when the independent term is unknown?
$begingroup$
If $x^2-2<frac{7}{2}x$ then what is the solution set for $x$?
I have most of the problem done, I just don't know how to lay out my answer. The answer is supposed to be $$boxed{-frac12<x<4}$$
First, I rewrote the problem saying $x^2-frac{7}{2}x-2<0$, and to be able to conveniently factor it I decided to multiply both sides by 2:
$$2x^2-7x-4<0$$
$$(2x+1)(x-4)<0$$
$$x<-frac12, x<4, text{or} (-infty, -frac12) cup (-infty, 4)$$
I know that doesn't make sense because that's the solution set for the equation less than $0$, when really we want to find the solution set for it less than $frac72x$. So how do I get the above solution? Would it suffice to just draw a number line and say if all values less than $-frac12$ and all values greater than $4$ turn the equation to $<0$ then it must be values between $-frac12 text{and} 4$?
algebra-precalculus inequality quadratics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $x^2-2<frac{7}{2}x$ then what is the solution set for $x$?
I have most of the problem done, I just don't know how to lay out my answer. The answer is supposed to be $$boxed{-frac12<x<4}$$
First, I rewrote the problem saying $x^2-frac{7}{2}x-2<0$, and to be able to conveniently factor it I decided to multiply both sides by 2:
$$2x^2-7x-4<0$$
$$(2x+1)(x-4)<0$$
$$x<-frac12, x<4, text{or} (-infty, -frac12) cup (-infty, 4)$$
I know that doesn't make sense because that's the solution set for the equation less than $0$, when really we want to find the solution set for it less than $frac72x$. So how do I get the above solution? Would it suffice to just draw a number line and say if all values less than $-frac12$ and all values greater than $4$ turn the equation to $<0$ then it must be values between $-frac12 text{and} 4$?
algebra-precalculus inequality quadratics
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You have almost solved it - draw a picture of $y = (2x+1)(x-4)$ and conclude that this graph is less than $0$ on the set $(-1/2, 4)$
$endgroup$
– Jack
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $x^2-2<frac{7}{2}x$ then what is the solution set for $x$?
I have most of the problem done, I just don't know how to lay out my answer. The answer is supposed to be $$boxed{-frac12<x<4}$$
First, I rewrote the problem saying $x^2-frac{7}{2}x-2<0$, and to be able to conveniently factor it I decided to multiply both sides by 2:
$$2x^2-7x-4<0$$
$$(2x+1)(x-4)<0$$
$$x<-frac12, x<4, text{or} (-infty, -frac12) cup (-infty, 4)$$
I know that doesn't make sense because that's the solution set for the equation less than $0$, when really we want to find the solution set for it less than $frac72x$. So how do I get the above solution? Would it suffice to just draw a number line and say if all values less than $-frac12$ and all values greater than $4$ turn the equation to $<0$ then it must be values between $-frac12 text{and} 4$?
algebra-precalculus inequality quadratics
$endgroup$
If $x^2-2<frac{7}{2}x$ then what is the solution set for $x$?
I have most of the problem done, I just don't know how to lay out my answer. The answer is supposed to be $$boxed{-frac12<x<4}$$
First, I rewrote the problem saying $x^2-frac{7}{2}x-2<0$, and to be able to conveniently factor it I decided to multiply both sides by 2:
$$2x^2-7x-4<0$$
$$(2x+1)(x-4)<0$$
$$x<-frac12, x<4, text{or} (-infty, -frac12) cup (-infty, 4)$$
I know that doesn't make sense because that's the solution set for the equation less than $0$, when really we want to find the solution set for it less than $frac72x$. So how do I get the above solution? Would it suffice to just draw a number line and say if all values less than $-frac12$ and all values greater than $4$ turn the equation to $<0$ then it must be values between $-frac12 text{and} 4$?
algebra-precalculus inequality quadratics
algebra-precalculus inequality quadratics
edited yesterday
YuiTo Cheng
2,3694937
2,3694937
asked yesterday
Lex_iLex_i
1177
1177
1
$begingroup$
You have almost solved it - draw a picture of $y = (2x+1)(x-4)$ and conclude that this graph is less than $0$ on the set $(-1/2, 4)$
$endgroup$
– Jack
yesterday
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You have almost solved it - draw a picture of $y = (2x+1)(x-4)$ and conclude that this graph is less than $0$ on the set $(-1/2, 4)$
$endgroup$
– Jack
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
You have almost solved it - draw a picture of $y = (2x+1)(x-4)$ and conclude that this graph is less than $0$ on the set $(-1/2, 4)$
$endgroup$
– Jack
yesterday
$begingroup$
You have almost solved it - draw a picture of $y = (2x+1)(x-4)$ and conclude that this graph is less than $0$ on the set $(-1/2, 4)$
$endgroup$
– Jack
yesterday
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You are on the right track. From $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$, you know that equality occurs when $x=-1/2$ and when $x=4$. To be safe, check the intervals begin{align}x<-1/2:quad &2x+1<0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0\-1/2<x<4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)<0\x>4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4>0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0end{align} Therefore the only solution to the inequality is $-1/2<x<4$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$ to be true, you want one of the numbers $(2x+1), (x-4)$ to be negative, and the other to be positive.
Option 1: the first is negative:
$2x+1<0, x-4>0$ translates to $x<-frac12$ and $x>4$ which is, of course, impossible.
Option 2: The first is positive:
$2x+1>0, x-4<0$ translates to $x>-frac12$ and $x<4$ which means $xin(-frac12, 4)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The inequality is $(x-frac 7 4)^{2}<2+frac {49} {16}$. This means $-r <x-frac 7 4 <r$ where $r=sqrt {2+frac {49} {16}}=frac 9 4$. Can you continue?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The key realization is that $ab<0$ if and only if one of them is positive, and one of them is negative.
So we know that
$$2x+1 <0 implies x < - frac 1 2 ;;;;; text{and} ;;;;; x-4<0 implies x<4$$
But notice that, for some values of $x$, you might have some of these positive, or at other times negative. So we have to consider three potential solution sets:
$x$ is between $-1/2,4$
$x$ is less than $-1/2$
$x$ is greater than $4$
If $x<-1/2$, then $2x+1<0$, but $x-4<0$ too, so their product is positive.
Similarly, if $x>4$, then both factors and thus their product is positive.
Thus, neither solution set can satisfy the inequalities simultaneously (and thus cannot solve the original inequality). The only conclusion left is that $-1/2 < x < 4$.
Indeed, since $x>-1/2$, we have $2x+1>0$, but since $x<4$ we have $x-4<0$. This means their product is negative, which is precisely what we want!
A more intuitive method might be to consider that, as noted, the original inequality is
$$x^2 - frac 7 2 x - 2 < 0$$
When is a quadratic negative? As it happens, you can easily see, if the leading coefficient is positive, then the quadratic is negative between its two roots! (For negative leading coefficient, it is negative outside of its roots instead.)
Yet another method might be to consider the three cases for this inequality: either $x$ is to the left of the leftmost root, in between the two, or to the right of the rightmost root. Plug in some $x$ on each interval - say, $x=-1, x=0, x=5$, respectively - and see which give you cases less than zero, and those that don't. Owing to how the quadratic behaves, the corresponding "test values" that satisfy the inequality are on the interval that is the solution (left of the left root, in-between, or right of the right root), and thus your answer would be those intervals. (Granted this isn't much different than the method noted in the previous paragraph, but if you find this easier to process more power to you man.)
And of course, a graph always helps if it's available. Though a graph doesn't constitute a full-blown proof, it can always be helpful for getting an intuition of the situation. Indeed for the inequality above, we have the graph below, which makes the solution set immediately clear:

$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181993%2ffinding-the-solution-set-for-a-quadratic-inequality-x2-2-frac72x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You are on the right track. From $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$, you know that equality occurs when $x=-1/2$ and when $x=4$. To be safe, check the intervals begin{align}x<-1/2:quad &2x+1<0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0\-1/2<x<4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)<0\x>4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4>0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0end{align} Therefore the only solution to the inequality is $-1/2<x<4$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are on the right track. From $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$, you know that equality occurs when $x=-1/2$ and when $x=4$. To be safe, check the intervals begin{align}x<-1/2:quad &2x+1<0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0\-1/2<x<4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)<0\x>4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4>0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0end{align} Therefore the only solution to the inequality is $-1/2<x<4$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are on the right track. From $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$, you know that equality occurs when $x=-1/2$ and when $x=4$. To be safe, check the intervals begin{align}x<-1/2:quad &2x+1<0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0\-1/2<x<4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)<0\x>4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4>0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0end{align} Therefore the only solution to the inequality is $-1/2<x<4$.
$endgroup$
You are on the right track. From $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$, you know that equality occurs when $x=-1/2$ and when $x=4$. To be safe, check the intervals begin{align}x<-1/2:quad &2x+1<0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0\-1/2<x<4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)<0\x>4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4>0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0end{align} Therefore the only solution to the inequality is $-1/2<x<4$.
answered yesterday
TheSimpliFireTheSimpliFire
13.2k62464
13.2k62464
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$ to be true, you want one of the numbers $(2x+1), (x-4)$ to be negative, and the other to be positive.
Option 1: the first is negative:
$2x+1<0, x-4>0$ translates to $x<-frac12$ and $x>4$ which is, of course, impossible.
Option 2: The first is positive:
$2x+1>0, x-4<0$ translates to $x>-frac12$ and $x<4$ which means $xin(-frac12, 4)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$ to be true, you want one of the numbers $(2x+1), (x-4)$ to be negative, and the other to be positive.
Option 1: the first is negative:
$2x+1<0, x-4>0$ translates to $x<-frac12$ and $x>4$ which is, of course, impossible.
Option 2: The first is positive:
$2x+1>0, x-4<0$ translates to $x>-frac12$ and $x<4$ which means $xin(-frac12, 4)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$ to be true, you want one of the numbers $(2x+1), (x-4)$ to be negative, and the other to be positive.
Option 1: the first is negative:
$2x+1<0, x-4>0$ translates to $x<-frac12$ and $x>4$ which is, of course, impossible.
Option 2: The first is positive:
$2x+1>0, x-4<0$ translates to $x>-frac12$ and $x<4$ which means $xin(-frac12, 4)$.
$endgroup$
For $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$ to be true, you want one of the numbers $(2x+1), (x-4)$ to be negative, and the other to be positive.
Option 1: the first is negative:
$2x+1<0, x-4>0$ translates to $x<-frac12$ and $x>4$ which is, of course, impossible.
Option 2: The first is positive:
$2x+1>0, x-4<0$ translates to $x>-frac12$ and $x<4$ which means $xin(-frac12, 4)$.
answered yesterday
5xum5xum
92.6k394162
92.6k394162
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The inequality is $(x-frac 7 4)^{2}<2+frac {49} {16}$. This means $-r <x-frac 7 4 <r$ where $r=sqrt {2+frac {49} {16}}=frac 9 4$. Can you continue?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The inequality is $(x-frac 7 4)^{2}<2+frac {49} {16}$. This means $-r <x-frac 7 4 <r$ where $r=sqrt {2+frac {49} {16}}=frac 9 4$. Can you continue?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The inequality is $(x-frac 7 4)^{2}<2+frac {49} {16}$. This means $-r <x-frac 7 4 <r$ where $r=sqrt {2+frac {49} {16}}=frac 9 4$. Can you continue?
$endgroup$
The inequality is $(x-frac 7 4)^{2}<2+frac {49} {16}$. This means $-r <x-frac 7 4 <r$ where $r=sqrt {2+frac {49} {16}}=frac 9 4$. Can you continue?
answered yesterday
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
74.1k53270
74.1k53270
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The key realization is that $ab<0$ if and only if one of them is positive, and one of them is negative.
So we know that
$$2x+1 <0 implies x < - frac 1 2 ;;;;; text{and} ;;;;; x-4<0 implies x<4$$
But notice that, for some values of $x$, you might have some of these positive, or at other times negative. So we have to consider three potential solution sets:
$x$ is between $-1/2,4$
$x$ is less than $-1/2$
$x$ is greater than $4$
If $x<-1/2$, then $2x+1<0$, but $x-4<0$ too, so their product is positive.
Similarly, if $x>4$, then both factors and thus their product is positive.
Thus, neither solution set can satisfy the inequalities simultaneously (and thus cannot solve the original inequality). The only conclusion left is that $-1/2 < x < 4$.
Indeed, since $x>-1/2$, we have $2x+1>0$, but since $x<4$ we have $x-4<0$. This means their product is negative, which is precisely what we want!
A more intuitive method might be to consider that, as noted, the original inequality is
$$x^2 - frac 7 2 x - 2 < 0$$
When is a quadratic negative? As it happens, you can easily see, if the leading coefficient is positive, then the quadratic is negative between its two roots! (For negative leading coefficient, it is negative outside of its roots instead.)
Yet another method might be to consider the three cases for this inequality: either $x$ is to the left of the leftmost root, in between the two, or to the right of the rightmost root. Plug in some $x$ on each interval - say, $x=-1, x=0, x=5$, respectively - and see which give you cases less than zero, and those that don't. Owing to how the quadratic behaves, the corresponding "test values" that satisfy the inequality are on the interval that is the solution (left of the left root, in-between, or right of the right root), and thus your answer would be those intervals. (Granted this isn't much different than the method noted in the previous paragraph, but if you find this easier to process more power to you man.)
And of course, a graph always helps if it's available. Though a graph doesn't constitute a full-blown proof, it can always be helpful for getting an intuition of the situation. Indeed for the inequality above, we have the graph below, which makes the solution set immediately clear:

$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The key realization is that $ab<0$ if and only if one of them is positive, and one of them is negative.
So we know that
$$2x+1 <0 implies x < - frac 1 2 ;;;;; text{and} ;;;;; x-4<0 implies x<4$$
But notice that, for some values of $x$, you might have some of these positive, or at other times negative. So we have to consider three potential solution sets:
$x$ is between $-1/2,4$
$x$ is less than $-1/2$
$x$ is greater than $4$
If $x<-1/2$, then $2x+1<0$, but $x-4<0$ too, so their product is positive.
Similarly, if $x>4$, then both factors and thus their product is positive.
Thus, neither solution set can satisfy the inequalities simultaneously (and thus cannot solve the original inequality). The only conclusion left is that $-1/2 < x < 4$.
Indeed, since $x>-1/2$, we have $2x+1>0$, but since $x<4$ we have $x-4<0$. This means their product is negative, which is precisely what we want!
A more intuitive method might be to consider that, as noted, the original inequality is
$$x^2 - frac 7 2 x - 2 < 0$$
When is a quadratic negative? As it happens, you can easily see, if the leading coefficient is positive, then the quadratic is negative between its two roots! (For negative leading coefficient, it is negative outside of its roots instead.)
Yet another method might be to consider the three cases for this inequality: either $x$ is to the left of the leftmost root, in between the two, or to the right of the rightmost root. Plug in some $x$ on each interval - say, $x=-1, x=0, x=5$, respectively - and see which give you cases less than zero, and those that don't. Owing to how the quadratic behaves, the corresponding "test values" that satisfy the inequality are on the interval that is the solution (left of the left root, in-between, or right of the right root), and thus your answer would be those intervals. (Granted this isn't much different than the method noted in the previous paragraph, but if you find this easier to process more power to you man.)
And of course, a graph always helps if it's available. Though a graph doesn't constitute a full-blown proof, it can always be helpful for getting an intuition of the situation. Indeed for the inequality above, we have the graph below, which makes the solution set immediately clear:

$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The key realization is that $ab<0$ if and only if one of them is positive, and one of them is negative.
So we know that
$$2x+1 <0 implies x < - frac 1 2 ;;;;; text{and} ;;;;; x-4<0 implies x<4$$
But notice that, for some values of $x$, you might have some of these positive, or at other times negative. So we have to consider three potential solution sets:
$x$ is between $-1/2,4$
$x$ is less than $-1/2$
$x$ is greater than $4$
If $x<-1/2$, then $2x+1<0$, but $x-4<0$ too, so their product is positive.
Similarly, if $x>4$, then both factors and thus their product is positive.
Thus, neither solution set can satisfy the inequalities simultaneously (and thus cannot solve the original inequality). The only conclusion left is that $-1/2 < x < 4$.
Indeed, since $x>-1/2$, we have $2x+1>0$, but since $x<4$ we have $x-4<0$. This means their product is negative, which is precisely what we want!
A more intuitive method might be to consider that, as noted, the original inequality is
$$x^2 - frac 7 2 x - 2 < 0$$
When is a quadratic negative? As it happens, you can easily see, if the leading coefficient is positive, then the quadratic is negative between its two roots! (For negative leading coefficient, it is negative outside of its roots instead.)
Yet another method might be to consider the three cases for this inequality: either $x$ is to the left of the leftmost root, in between the two, or to the right of the rightmost root. Plug in some $x$ on each interval - say, $x=-1, x=0, x=5$, respectively - and see which give you cases less than zero, and those that don't. Owing to how the quadratic behaves, the corresponding "test values" that satisfy the inequality are on the interval that is the solution (left of the left root, in-between, or right of the right root), and thus your answer would be those intervals. (Granted this isn't much different than the method noted in the previous paragraph, but if you find this easier to process more power to you man.)
And of course, a graph always helps if it's available. Though a graph doesn't constitute a full-blown proof, it can always be helpful for getting an intuition of the situation. Indeed for the inequality above, we have the graph below, which makes the solution set immediately clear:

$endgroup$
The key realization is that $ab<0$ if and only if one of them is positive, and one of them is negative.
So we know that
$$2x+1 <0 implies x < - frac 1 2 ;;;;; text{and} ;;;;; x-4<0 implies x<4$$
But notice that, for some values of $x$, you might have some of these positive, or at other times negative. So we have to consider three potential solution sets:
$x$ is between $-1/2,4$
$x$ is less than $-1/2$
$x$ is greater than $4$
If $x<-1/2$, then $2x+1<0$, but $x-4<0$ too, so their product is positive.
Similarly, if $x>4$, then both factors and thus their product is positive.
Thus, neither solution set can satisfy the inequalities simultaneously (and thus cannot solve the original inequality). The only conclusion left is that $-1/2 < x < 4$.
Indeed, since $x>-1/2$, we have $2x+1>0$, but since $x<4$ we have $x-4<0$. This means their product is negative, which is precisely what we want!
A more intuitive method might be to consider that, as noted, the original inequality is
$$x^2 - frac 7 2 x - 2 < 0$$
When is a quadratic negative? As it happens, you can easily see, if the leading coefficient is positive, then the quadratic is negative between its two roots! (For negative leading coefficient, it is negative outside of its roots instead.)
Yet another method might be to consider the three cases for this inequality: either $x$ is to the left of the leftmost root, in between the two, or to the right of the rightmost root. Plug in some $x$ on each interval - say, $x=-1, x=0, x=5$, respectively - and see which give you cases less than zero, and those that don't. Owing to how the quadratic behaves, the corresponding "test values" that satisfy the inequality are on the interval that is the solution (left of the left root, in-between, or right of the right root), and thus your answer would be those intervals. (Granted this isn't much different than the method noted in the previous paragraph, but if you find this easier to process more power to you man.)
And of course, a graph always helps if it's available. Though a graph doesn't constitute a full-blown proof, it can always be helpful for getting an intuition of the situation. Indeed for the inequality above, we have the graph below, which makes the solution set immediately clear:

edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer
10.4k31742
10.4k31742
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181993%2ffinding-the-solution-set-for-a-quadratic-inequality-x2-2-frac72x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
You have almost solved it - draw a picture of $y = (2x+1)(x-4)$ and conclude that this graph is less than $0$ on the set $(-1/2, 4)$
$endgroup$
– Jack
yesterday