When does a function NOT have an antiderivative? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate...

Russian equivalents of おしゃれは足元から (Every good outfit starts with the shoes)

How to resize main filesystem

Short story about astronauts fertilizing soil with their own bodies

How to make triangles with rounded sides and corners? (squircle with 3 sides)

An isoperimetric-type inequality inside a cube

Diophantine equation 3^a+1=3^b+5^c

Keep at all times, the minus sign above aligned with minus sign below

Any stored/leased 737s that could substitute for grounded MAXs?

My mentor says to set image to Fine instead of RAW — how is this different from JPG?

3D Masyu - A Die

How to achieve cat-like agility?

Sally's older brother

The test team as an enemy of development? And how can this be avoided?

Noise in Eigenvalues plot

Is there a verb for listening stealthily?

Why does BitLocker not use RSA?

Why did Bronn offer to be Tyrion Lannister's champion in trial by combat?

Does the transliteration of 'Dravidian' exist in Hindu scripture? Does 'Dravida' refer to a Geographical area or an ethnic group?

What is "Lambda" in Heston's original paper on stochastic volatility models?

Where did Ptolemy compare the Earth to the distance of fixed stars?

First paper to introduce the "principal-agent problem"

Centre cell vertically in tabularx

What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思?

Problem with display of presentation



When does a function NOT have an antiderivative?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How can you prove that a function has no closed form integral?Does L'Hôpital's work the other way?Finding volumes - when to use double integrals and triple integrals?Why does a function have to be bounded to be integrable?Proof that order of integration does not matter for non-continuous functionswhy we say this function have closed form while the other doesn't?Antiderivative of unbounded function?antiderivative of jump-discontinuous functionWhy is it legal to take the antiderivative of both sides of an equation?why $int sqrt{(sin x)^2}, mathrm{d}x = int |sin x| ,mathrm{d}x$Why does the antiderivative of $frac{1}{x}$ have to be $0$ at precisely $x=1$? (when $C = 0$)












0












$begingroup$


I know this question may sound naïve but why can't we write $int e^{x^2} dx$ as $int e^{2x} dx$? The former does not have an antiderivative, while the latter has.



In light of this question, what are sufficient conditions for a function NOT to have an antiderivative. That is, do we need careful examination of a function to say it does not have an antiderivative or is there any way that once you see the function, you can right away say it does not have an antiderivative?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Maybe because $x^2$ isn't the same as $2x$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $$e^{x^2}=e^{xcdot x}neq e^xcdot e^x = e^{x+x}=e^{2x}$$
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $(e^x)^2$ would be where you use the rule that you're thinking of.
    $endgroup$
    – Tartaglia's Stutter
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of How can you prove that a function has no closed form integral?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Foreman
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DonThousand OP - "what are sufficient conditions for a function NOT to have an antiderivative"
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Foreman
    6 hours ago
















0












$begingroup$


I know this question may sound naïve but why can't we write $int e^{x^2} dx$ as $int e^{2x} dx$? The former does not have an antiderivative, while the latter has.



In light of this question, what are sufficient conditions for a function NOT to have an antiderivative. That is, do we need careful examination of a function to say it does not have an antiderivative or is there any way that once you see the function, you can right away say it does not have an antiderivative?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Maybe because $x^2$ isn't the same as $2x$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $$e^{x^2}=e^{xcdot x}neq e^xcdot e^x = e^{x+x}=e^{2x}$$
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $(e^x)^2$ would be where you use the rule that you're thinking of.
    $endgroup$
    – Tartaglia's Stutter
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of How can you prove that a function has no closed form integral?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Foreman
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DonThousand OP - "what are sufficient conditions for a function NOT to have an antiderivative"
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Foreman
    6 hours ago














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I know this question may sound naïve but why can't we write $int e^{x^2} dx$ as $int e^{2x} dx$? The former does not have an antiderivative, while the latter has.



In light of this question, what are sufficient conditions for a function NOT to have an antiderivative. That is, do we need careful examination of a function to say it does not have an antiderivative or is there any way that once you see the function, you can right away say it does not have an antiderivative?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I know this question may sound naïve but why can't we write $int e^{x^2} dx$ as $int e^{2x} dx$? The former does not have an antiderivative, while the latter has.



In light of this question, what are sufficient conditions for a function NOT to have an antiderivative. That is, do we need careful examination of a function to say it does not have an antiderivative or is there any way that once you see the function, you can right away say it does not have an antiderivative?







integration






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 6 hours ago









RobRob

331110




331110








  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Maybe because $x^2$ isn't the same as $2x$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $$e^{x^2}=e^{xcdot x}neq e^xcdot e^x = e^{x+x}=e^{2x}$$
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $(e^x)^2$ would be where you use the rule that you're thinking of.
    $endgroup$
    – Tartaglia's Stutter
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of How can you prove that a function has no closed form integral?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Foreman
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DonThousand OP - "what are sufficient conditions for a function NOT to have an antiderivative"
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Foreman
    6 hours ago














  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Maybe because $x^2$ isn't the same as $2x$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $$e^{x^2}=e^{xcdot x}neq e^xcdot e^x = e^{x+x}=e^{2x}$$
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $(e^x)^2$ would be where you use the rule that you're thinking of.
    $endgroup$
    – Tartaglia's Stutter
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of How can you prove that a function has no closed form integral?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Foreman
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DonThousand OP - "what are sufficient conditions for a function NOT to have an antiderivative"
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Foreman
    6 hours ago








10




10




$begingroup$
Maybe because $x^2$ isn't the same as $2x$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Maybe because $x^2$ isn't the same as $2x$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
6 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
$$e^{x^2}=e^{xcdot x}neq e^xcdot e^x = e^{x+x}=e^{2x}$$
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
$$e^{x^2}=e^{xcdot x}neq e^xcdot e^x = e^{x+x}=e^{2x}$$
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
6 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
$(e^x)^2$ would be where you use the rule that you're thinking of.
$endgroup$
– Tartaglia's Stutter
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
$(e^x)^2$ would be where you use the rule that you're thinking of.
$endgroup$
– Tartaglia's Stutter
6 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of How can you prove that a function has no closed form integral?
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of How can you prove that a function has no closed form integral?
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
6 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@DonThousand OP - "what are sufficient conditions for a function NOT to have an antiderivative"
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
@DonThousand OP - "what are sufficient conditions for a function NOT to have an antiderivative"
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
6 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

As you might have realised, exponentiation is not associative:



$$left(a^bright)^c ne a^left(b^cright)$$



So what should $a^{b^c}$ mean? The convention is that exponentiation is right associative:



$$a^{b^c} = a^left(b^cright)$$



Because the otherwise left-associative exponentiation is just less useful and redundant, as it can be represented by multiplication inside the power (again as you might have realised):



$$a^{bc} = left(a^bright)^c$$



Wikipedia on associativity of exponentiation.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Liouville's theorem:




    In mathematics, Liouville's theorem, originally formulated by Joseph Liouville in 1833 to 1841, places an important restriction on antiderivatives that can be expressed as elementary functions.



    The antiderivatives of certain elementary functions cannot themselves be expressed as elementary functions. A standard example of such a function is $e^{-x^2}$, whose antiderivative is (with a multiplier of a constant) the error function, familiar from statistics. Other examples include the functions $frac{ sin ( x ) }{ x }$ and $ x^x $.




    From wikipedia. See the article for more details.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      The exponential expression $a^{b^c}$ is equal to $a^{(b^c)}$. It is not equal to $(a^b)^c=a^{bcdot c}$ as you seem to think it is. In general an exponential is evaluated from right to left with the highest term evaluated first. That is to say
      $$large{x_0^{x_1^{x_2^{dots^{x_n}}}}=x_0^{left(x_1^{left(x_2^{left(dots^{(x_n)}right)}right)}right)}}$$



      For the second part of your question see this duplicate.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        I didn't think $a^{(b^c)} = (a^b)^c$. Once we put parentheses it is all clear. But I think one would not be wrong for interpreting $e^{x^2}$ as $e^{2x}$, since without parentheses it can mean both things . Am I correct?
        $endgroup$
        – Rob
        6 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        NO! Without parentheses the expression $a^{b^c}$ is always equal to $a^{left(b^cright)}$. See here - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Identities_and_properties
        $endgroup$
        – Peter Foreman
        6 hours ago












      • $begingroup$
        I see! Well, I learnt something new that bothered me for a long time. So $e ^ {x^2}$ is understood as $e^{(x^2)}$. Also the link you sent, which I could not find at first, is very interesting but a little advanced for me.
        $endgroup$
        – Rob
        6 hours ago



















      1












      $begingroup$

      To answer the titular question, there's a result in real analysis that shows that derivatives satisfy have the intermediate value property (just like continuous functions). It follows that a function that skips values cannot be the derivative of anything in the usual sense. This implies that functions with jump discontinuities (like the Heaviside step, for example) cannot be the derivative of anything.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Correct me if I am wrong, but that does not explain why $e^{x^2}$ has no antiderivative, right? I understand you are answering the titular question.
        $endgroup$
        – Rob
        6 hours ago






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        $e^{x^2}$ does have an antiderivative, but it can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions. Having an antiderivative and having an elementary antiderivative are not the same thing.
        $endgroup$
        – MathIsFun
        5 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @MathIsFun I see your point. I had the wrong understanding then! Thanks for pointing it out
        $endgroup$
        – Rob
        2 hours ago












      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196128%2fwhen-does-a-function-not-have-an-antiderivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      As you might have realised, exponentiation is not associative:



      $$left(a^bright)^c ne a^left(b^cright)$$



      So what should $a^{b^c}$ mean? The convention is that exponentiation is right associative:



      $$a^{b^c} = a^left(b^cright)$$



      Because the otherwise left-associative exponentiation is just less useful and redundant, as it can be represented by multiplication inside the power (again as you might have realised):



      $$a^{bc} = left(a^bright)^c$$



      Wikipedia on associativity of exponentiation.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        4












        $begingroup$

        As you might have realised, exponentiation is not associative:



        $$left(a^bright)^c ne a^left(b^cright)$$



        So what should $a^{b^c}$ mean? The convention is that exponentiation is right associative:



        $$a^{b^c} = a^left(b^cright)$$



        Because the otherwise left-associative exponentiation is just less useful and redundant, as it can be represented by multiplication inside the power (again as you might have realised):



        $$a^{bc} = left(a^bright)^c$$



        Wikipedia on associativity of exponentiation.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          As you might have realised, exponentiation is not associative:



          $$left(a^bright)^c ne a^left(b^cright)$$



          So what should $a^{b^c}$ mean? The convention is that exponentiation is right associative:



          $$a^{b^c} = a^left(b^cright)$$



          Because the otherwise left-associative exponentiation is just less useful and redundant, as it can be represented by multiplication inside the power (again as you might have realised):



          $$a^{bc} = left(a^bright)^c$$



          Wikipedia on associativity of exponentiation.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          As you might have realised, exponentiation is not associative:



          $$left(a^bright)^c ne a^left(b^cright)$$



          So what should $a^{b^c}$ mean? The convention is that exponentiation is right associative:



          $$a^{b^c} = a^left(b^cright)$$



          Because the otherwise left-associative exponentiation is just less useful and redundant, as it can be represented by multiplication inside the power (again as you might have realised):



          $$a^{bc} = left(a^bright)^c$$



          Wikipedia on associativity of exponentiation.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          peterwhypeterwhy

          12.4k21229




          12.4k21229























              2












              $begingroup$

              Liouville's theorem:




              In mathematics, Liouville's theorem, originally formulated by Joseph Liouville in 1833 to 1841, places an important restriction on antiderivatives that can be expressed as elementary functions.



              The antiderivatives of certain elementary functions cannot themselves be expressed as elementary functions. A standard example of such a function is $e^{-x^2}$, whose antiderivative is (with a multiplier of a constant) the error function, familiar from statistics. Other examples include the functions $frac{ sin ( x ) }{ x }$ and $ x^x $.




              From wikipedia. See the article for more details.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                Liouville's theorem:




                In mathematics, Liouville's theorem, originally formulated by Joseph Liouville in 1833 to 1841, places an important restriction on antiderivatives that can be expressed as elementary functions.



                The antiderivatives of certain elementary functions cannot themselves be expressed as elementary functions. A standard example of such a function is $e^{-x^2}$, whose antiderivative is (with a multiplier of a constant) the error function, familiar from statistics. Other examples include the functions $frac{ sin ( x ) }{ x }$ and $ x^x $.




                From wikipedia. See the article for more details.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Liouville's theorem:




                  In mathematics, Liouville's theorem, originally formulated by Joseph Liouville in 1833 to 1841, places an important restriction on antiderivatives that can be expressed as elementary functions.



                  The antiderivatives of certain elementary functions cannot themselves be expressed as elementary functions. A standard example of such a function is $e^{-x^2}$, whose antiderivative is (with a multiplier of a constant) the error function, familiar from statistics. Other examples include the functions $frac{ sin ( x ) }{ x }$ and $ x^x $.




                  From wikipedia. See the article for more details.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Liouville's theorem:




                  In mathematics, Liouville's theorem, originally formulated by Joseph Liouville in 1833 to 1841, places an important restriction on antiderivatives that can be expressed as elementary functions.



                  The antiderivatives of certain elementary functions cannot themselves be expressed as elementary functions. A standard example of such a function is $e^{-x^2}$, whose antiderivative is (with a multiplier of a constant) the error function, familiar from statistics. Other examples include the functions $frac{ sin ( x ) }{ x }$ and $ x^x $.




                  From wikipedia. See the article for more details.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 3 hours ago









                  AccidentalFourierTransformAccidentalFourierTransform

                  1,482828




                  1,482828























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      The exponential expression $a^{b^c}$ is equal to $a^{(b^c)}$. It is not equal to $(a^b)^c=a^{bcdot c}$ as you seem to think it is. In general an exponential is evaluated from right to left with the highest term evaluated first. That is to say
                      $$large{x_0^{x_1^{x_2^{dots^{x_n}}}}=x_0^{left(x_1^{left(x_2^{left(dots^{(x_n)}right)}right)}right)}}$$



                      For the second part of your question see this duplicate.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        I didn't think $a^{(b^c)} = (a^b)^c$. Once we put parentheses it is all clear. But I think one would not be wrong for interpreting $e^{x^2}$ as $e^{2x}$, since without parentheses it can mean both things . Am I correct?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rob
                        6 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        NO! Without parentheses the expression $a^{b^c}$ is always equal to $a^{left(b^cright)}$. See here - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Identities_and_properties
                        $endgroup$
                        – Peter Foreman
                        6 hours ago












                      • $begingroup$
                        I see! Well, I learnt something new that bothered me for a long time. So $e ^ {x^2}$ is understood as $e^{(x^2)}$. Also the link you sent, which I could not find at first, is very interesting but a little advanced for me.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rob
                        6 hours ago
















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      The exponential expression $a^{b^c}$ is equal to $a^{(b^c)}$. It is not equal to $(a^b)^c=a^{bcdot c}$ as you seem to think it is. In general an exponential is evaluated from right to left with the highest term evaluated first. That is to say
                      $$large{x_0^{x_1^{x_2^{dots^{x_n}}}}=x_0^{left(x_1^{left(x_2^{left(dots^{(x_n)}right)}right)}right)}}$$



                      For the second part of your question see this duplicate.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        I didn't think $a^{(b^c)} = (a^b)^c$. Once we put parentheses it is all clear. But I think one would not be wrong for interpreting $e^{x^2}$ as $e^{2x}$, since without parentheses it can mean both things . Am I correct?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rob
                        6 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        NO! Without parentheses the expression $a^{b^c}$ is always equal to $a^{left(b^cright)}$. See here - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Identities_and_properties
                        $endgroup$
                        – Peter Foreman
                        6 hours ago












                      • $begingroup$
                        I see! Well, I learnt something new that bothered me for a long time. So $e ^ {x^2}$ is understood as $e^{(x^2)}$. Also the link you sent, which I could not find at first, is very interesting but a little advanced for me.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rob
                        6 hours ago














                      1












                      1








                      1





                      $begingroup$

                      The exponential expression $a^{b^c}$ is equal to $a^{(b^c)}$. It is not equal to $(a^b)^c=a^{bcdot c}$ as you seem to think it is. In general an exponential is evaluated from right to left with the highest term evaluated first. That is to say
                      $$large{x_0^{x_1^{x_2^{dots^{x_n}}}}=x_0^{left(x_1^{left(x_2^{left(dots^{(x_n)}right)}right)}right)}}$$



                      For the second part of your question see this duplicate.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      The exponential expression $a^{b^c}$ is equal to $a^{(b^c)}$. It is not equal to $(a^b)^c=a^{bcdot c}$ as you seem to think it is. In general an exponential is evaluated from right to left with the highest term evaluated first. That is to say
                      $$large{x_0^{x_1^{x_2^{dots^{x_n}}}}=x_0^{left(x_1^{left(x_2^{left(dots^{(x_n)}right)}right)}right)}}$$



                      For the second part of your question see this duplicate.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered 6 hours ago









                      Peter ForemanPeter Foreman

                      8,5171321




                      8,5171321












                      • $begingroup$
                        I didn't think $a^{(b^c)} = (a^b)^c$. Once we put parentheses it is all clear. But I think one would not be wrong for interpreting $e^{x^2}$ as $e^{2x}$, since without parentheses it can mean both things . Am I correct?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rob
                        6 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        NO! Without parentheses the expression $a^{b^c}$ is always equal to $a^{left(b^cright)}$. See here - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Identities_and_properties
                        $endgroup$
                        – Peter Foreman
                        6 hours ago












                      • $begingroup$
                        I see! Well, I learnt something new that bothered me for a long time. So $e ^ {x^2}$ is understood as $e^{(x^2)}$. Also the link you sent, which I could not find at first, is very interesting but a little advanced for me.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rob
                        6 hours ago


















                      • $begingroup$
                        I didn't think $a^{(b^c)} = (a^b)^c$. Once we put parentheses it is all clear. But I think one would not be wrong for interpreting $e^{x^2}$ as $e^{2x}$, since without parentheses it can mean both things . Am I correct?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rob
                        6 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        NO! Without parentheses the expression $a^{b^c}$ is always equal to $a^{left(b^cright)}$. See here - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Identities_and_properties
                        $endgroup$
                        – Peter Foreman
                        6 hours ago












                      • $begingroup$
                        I see! Well, I learnt something new that bothered me for a long time. So $e ^ {x^2}$ is understood as $e^{(x^2)}$. Also the link you sent, which I could not find at first, is very interesting but a little advanced for me.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rob
                        6 hours ago
















                      $begingroup$
                      I didn't think $a^{(b^c)} = (a^b)^c$. Once we put parentheses it is all clear. But I think one would not be wrong for interpreting $e^{x^2}$ as $e^{2x}$, since without parentheses it can mean both things . Am I correct?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rob
                      6 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      I didn't think $a^{(b^c)} = (a^b)^c$. Once we put parentheses it is all clear. But I think one would not be wrong for interpreting $e^{x^2}$ as $e^{2x}$, since without parentheses it can mean both things . Am I correct?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rob
                      6 hours ago












                      $begingroup$
                      NO! Without parentheses the expression $a^{b^c}$ is always equal to $a^{left(b^cright)}$. See here - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Identities_and_properties
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Foreman
                      6 hours ago






                      $begingroup$
                      NO! Without parentheses the expression $a^{b^c}$ is always equal to $a^{left(b^cright)}$. See here - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Identities_and_properties
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Foreman
                      6 hours ago














                      $begingroup$
                      I see! Well, I learnt something new that bothered me for a long time. So $e ^ {x^2}$ is understood as $e^{(x^2)}$. Also the link you sent, which I could not find at first, is very interesting but a little advanced for me.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rob
                      6 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      I see! Well, I learnt something new that bothered me for a long time. So $e ^ {x^2}$ is understood as $e^{(x^2)}$. Also the link you sent, which I could not find at first, is very interesting but a little advanced for me.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rob
                      6 hours ago











                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      To answer the titular question, there's a result in real analysis that shows that derivatives satisfy have the intermediate value property (just like continuous functions). It follows that a function that skips values cannot be the derivative of anything in the usual sense. This implies that functions with jump discontinuities (like the Heaviside step, for example) cannot be the derivative of anything.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        Correct me if I am wrong, but that does not explain why $e^{x^2}$ has no antiderivative, right? I understand you are answering the titular question.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rob
                        6 hours ago






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        $e^{x^2}$ does have an antiderivative, but it can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions. Having an antiderivative and having an elementary antiderivative are not the same thing.
                        $endgroup$
                        – MathIsFun
                        5 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @MathIsFun I see your point. I had the wrong understanding then! Thanks for pointing it out
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rob
                        2 hours ago
















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      To answer the titular question, there's a result in real analysis that shows that derivatives satisfy have the intermediate value property (just like continuous functions). It follows that a function that skips values cannot be the derivative of anything in the usual sense. This implies that functions with jump discontinuities (like the Heaviside step, for example) cannot be the derivative of anything.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        Correct me if I am wrong, but that does not explain why $e^{x^2}$ has no antiderivative, right? I understand you are answering the titular question.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rob
                        6 hours ago






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        $e^{x^2}$ does have an antiderivative, but it can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions. Having an antiderivative and having an elementary antiderivative are not the same thing.
                        $endgroup$
                        – MathIsFun
                        5 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @MathIsFun I see your point. I had the wrong understanding then! Thanks for pointing it out
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rob
                        2 hours ago














                      1












                      1








                      1





                      $begingroup$

                      To answer the titular question, there's a result in real analysis that shows that derivatives satisfy have the intermediate value property (just like continuous functions). It follows that a function that skips values cannot be the derivative of anything in the usual sense. This implies that functions with jump discontinuities (like the Heaviside step, for example) cannot be the derivative of anything.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      To answer the titular question, there's a result in real analysis that shows that derivatives satisfy have the intermediate value property (just like continuous functions). It follows that a function that skips values cannot be the derivative of anything in the usual sense. This implies that functions with jump discontinuities (like the Heaviside step, for example) cannot be the derivative of anything.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered 6 hours ago









                      AllawonderAllawonder

                      2,349617




                      2,349617












                      • $begingroup$
                        Correct me if I am wrong, but that does not explain why $e^{x^2}$ has no antiderivative, right? I understand you are answering the titular question.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rob
                        6 hours ago






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        $e^{x^2}$ does have an antiderivative, but it can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions. Having an antiderivative and having an elementary antiderivative are not the same thing.
                        $endgroup$
                        – MathIsFun
                        5 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @MathIsFun I see your point. I had the wrong understanding then! Thanks for pointing it out
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rob
                        2 hours ago


















                      • $begingroup$
                        Correct me if I am wrong, but that does not explain why $e^{x^2}$ has no antiderivative, right? I understand you are answering the titular question.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rob
                        6 hours ago






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        $e^{x^2}$ does have an antiderivative, but it can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions. Having an antiderivative and having an elementary antiderivative are not the same thing.
                        $endgroup$
                        – MathIsFun
                        5 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @MathIsFun I see your point. I had the wrong understanding then! Thanks for pointing it out
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rob
                        2 hours ago
















                      $begingroup$
                      Correct me if I am wrong, but that does not explain why $e^{x^2}$ has no antiderivative, right? I understand you are answering the titular question.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rob
                      6 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      Correct me if I am wrong, but that does not explain why $e^{x^2}$ has no antiderivative, right? I understand you are answering the titular question.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rob
                      6 hours ago




                      2




                      2




                      $begingroup$
                      $e^{x^2}$ does have an antiderivative, but it can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions. Having an antiderivative and having an elementary antiderivative are not the same thing.
                      $endgroup$
                      – MathIsFun
                      5 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      $e^{x^2}$ does have an antiderivative, but it can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions. Having an antiderivative and having an elementary antiderivative are not the same thing.
                      $endgroup$
                      – MathIsFun
                      5 hours ago












                      $begingroup$
                      @MathIsFun I see your point. I had the wrong understanding then! Thanks for pointing it out
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rob
                      2 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      @MathIsFun I see your point. I had the wrong understanding then! Thanks for pointing it out
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rob
                      2 hours ago


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196128%2fwhen-does-a-function-not-have-an-antiderivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Cannot install PyQt5 The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCannot install tcpreplay 3.4.4cannot...

                      Kapp-Putsch Acontecimentos | Outros artigos | Menu de navegação

                      Why did early computer designers eschew integers? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat register...