Does a random sequence of vectors span a Hilbert space? Planned maintenance scheduled April...



Does a random sequence of vectors span a Hilbert space?



Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Gaussian processes, sample paths and associated Hilbert space.non-Identity operator on a separable Hilbert spaceProhorov's theorem for random elements of Hilbert space: weak convergenceExistence of a complementary closed subspace extending a given subspaceBoundedness of a Hilbert space projection mapHow many times does a simple symmetric random walk of length n return to the origin?A homeomorphism between the unit interval $[0,1]$ and a linearly independent subset of a Hilbert spaceHoeffding's inequality for Hilbert space valued random elementsA formula related to the Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse of Hilbert space operatorsA sequence of orthogonal projection in Hilbert space












7












$begingroup$


Let $mathcal{H}$ be a separable Hilbert space. Let $v$ be a random variable taking values in $mathcal{H}$ such that $P(v perp h) < 1$ for all $h in mathcal{H}.$ Suppose we sample an infinite sequence $v_1, v_2, ldots.$ Is it the case that, almost surely, the closed span of $v_1, v_2, ldots$ is all of $mathcal{H}?$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    and if they are iid the probability of being in a closed hyperplane $(h)^perp$ is $P(v_kperp h, k=1,2,dots)=0$
    $endgroup$
    – Pietro Majer
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Pietro Majer: this is the probability that the vectors all lie in a given closed hyperplane.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony Quas
    8 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Whoever voted to close this, I'm pretty sure you don't understand the question. This is subtle and interesting.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony Quas
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but is it even clear that the event you are interested in is measurable?
    $endgroup$
    – Jochen Glueck
    8 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JochenGlueck: Yes it's measurable: Let $(y_n)$ be a dense sequence in $mathcal H$. Then the event is: for all $m>0$, for all $n>0$, there exist $k>0$ and rational $t_1,ldots,t_k$ such that $|t_1v_1+ldots+t_kv_k-y_n|<1/m$.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony Quas
    6 hours ago


















7












$begingroup$


Let $mathcal{H}$ be a separable Hilbert space. Let $v$ be a random variable taking values in $mathcal{H}$ such that $P(v perp h) < 1$ for all $h in mathcal{H}.$ Suppose we sample an infinite sequence $v_1, v_2, ldots.$ Is it the case that, almost surely, the closed span of $v_1, v_2, ldots$ is all of $mathcal{H}?$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    and if they are iid the probability of being in a closed hyperplane $(h)^perp$ is $P(v_kperp h, k=1,2,dots)=0$
    $endgroup$
    – Pietro Majer
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Pietro Majer: this is the probability that the vectors all lie in a given closed hyperplane.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony Quas
    8 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Whoever voted to close this, I'm pretty sure you don't understand the question. This is subtle and interesting.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony Quas
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but is it even clear that the event you are interested in is measurable?
    $endgroup$
    – Jochen Glueck
    8 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JochenGlueck: Yes it's measurable: Let $(y_n)$ be a dense sequence in $mathcal H$. Then the event is: for all $m>0$, for all $n>0$, there exist $k>0$ and rational $t_1,ldots,t_k$ such that $|t_1v_1+ldots+t_kv_k-y_n|<1/m$.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony Quas
    6 hours ago
















7












7








7


3



$begingroup$


Let $mathcal{H}$ be a separable Hilbert space. Let $v$ be a random variable taking values in $mathcal{H}$ such that $P(v perp h) < 1$ for all $h in mathcal{H}.$ Suppose we sample an infinite sequence $v_1, v_2, ldots.$ Is it the case that, almost surely, the closed span of $v_1, v_2, ldots$ is all of $mathcal{H}?$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $mathcal{H}$ be a separable Hilbert space. Let $v$ be a random variable taking values in $mathcal{H}$ such that $P(v perp h) < 1$ for all $h in mathcal{H}.$ Suppose we sample an infinite sequence $v_1, v_2, ldots.$ Is it the case that, almost surely, the closed span of $v_1, v_2, ldots$ is all of $mathcal{H}?$







reference-request fa.functional-analysis pr.probability operator-theory hilbert-spaces






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 9 hours ago









J. E. PascoeJ. E. Pascoe

570316




570316












  • $begingroup$
    and if they are iid the probability of being in a closed hyperplane $(h)^perp$ is $P(v_kperp h, k=1,2,dots)=0$
    $endgroup$
    – Pietro Majer
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Pietro Majer: this is the probability that the vectors all lie in a given closed hyperplane.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony Quas
    8 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Whoever voted to close this, I'm pretty sure you don't understand the question. This is subtle and interesting.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony Quas
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but is it even clear that the event you are interested in is measurable?
    $endgroup$
    – Jochen Glueck
    8 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JochenGlueck: Yes it's measurable: Let $(y_n)$ be a dense sequence in $mathcal H$. Then the event is: for all $m>0$, for all $n>0$, there exist $k>0$ and rational $t_1,ldots,t_k$ such that $|t_1v_1+ldots+t_kv_k-y_n|<1/m$.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony Quas
    6 hours ago




















  • $begingroup$
    and if they are iid the probability of being in a closed hyperplane $(h)^perp$ is $P(v_kperp h, k=1,2,dots)=0$
    $endgroup$
    – Pietro Majer
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Pietro Majer: this is the probability that the vectors all lie in a given closed hyperplane.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony Quas
    8 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Whoever voted to close this, I'm pretty sure you don't understand the question. This is subtle and interesting.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony Quas
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but is it even clear that the event you are interested in is measurable?
    $endgroup$
    – Jochen Glueck
    8 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JochenGlueck: Yes it's measurable: Let $(y_n)$ be a dense sequence in $mathcal H$. Then the event is: for all $m>0$, for all $n>0$, there exist $k>0$ and rational $t_1,ldots,t_k$ such that $|t_1v_1+ldots+t_kv_k-y_n|<1/m$.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony Quas
    6 hours ago


















$begingroup$
and if they are iid the probability of being in a closed hyperplane $(h)^perp$ is $P(v_kperp h, k=1,2,dots)=0$
$endgroup$
– Pietro Majer
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
and if they are iid the probability of being in a closed hyperplane $(h)^perp$ is $P(v_kperp h, k=1,2,dots)=0$
$endgroup$
– Pietro Majer
8 hours ago




3




3




$begingroup$
@Pietro Majer: this is the probability that the vectors all lie in a given closed hyperplane.
$endgroup$
– Anthony Quas
8 hours ago






$begingroup$
@Pietro Majer: this is the probability that the vectors all lie in a given closed hyperplane.
$endgroup$
– Anthony Quas
8 hours ago






2




2




$begingroup$
Whoever voted to close this, I'm pretty sure you don't understand the question. This is subtle and interesting.
$endgroup$
– Anthony Quas
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Whoever voted to close this, I'm pretty sure you don't understand the question. This is subtle and interesting.
$endgroup$
– Anthony Quas
8 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but is it even clear that the event you are interested in is measurable?
$endgroup$
– Jochen Glueck
8 hours ago






$begingroup$
Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but is it even clear that the event you are interested in is measurable?
$endgroup$
– Jochen Glueck
8 hours ago






1




1




$begingroup$
@JochenGlueck: Yes it's measurable: Let $(y_n)$ be a dense sequence in $mathcal H$. Then the event is: for all $m>0$, for all $n>0$, there exist $k>0$ and rational $t_1,ldots,t_k$ such that $|t_1v_1+ldots+t_kv_k-y_n|<1/m$.
$endgroup$
– Anthony Quas
6 hours ago






$begingroup$
@JochenGlueck: Yes it's measurable: Let $(y_n)$ be a dense sequence in $mathcal H$. Then the event is: for all $m>0$, for all $n>0$, there exist $k>0$ and rational $t_1,ldots,t_k$ such that $|t_1v_1+ldots+t_kv_k-y_n|<1/m$.
$endgroup$
– Anthony Quas
6 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

(This may turn out to be a simplified version of J. E. Pascoe's answer).



With probability one, the closure of the random set $V = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$ is equal to $operatorname{supp} v$, the support of the distribution of $v$ ($operatorname{supp} v$ is the set of those $h$ such that $P(v in B(h, varepsilon)) > 0$ for every $varepsilon > 0$).



For every $h$, we have $P(h perp v) < 1$, and therefore $h$ is not orthogonal to $operatorname{supp} v$. It follows that the closed span of $operatorname{supp} v$ is $mathcal{H}$.



It remains to note that the closed span of $V$ is the same as the closed span of the closure of $V$, equal to $operatorname{supp} v$ with probability one.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    Another Try



    We say a $mathcal{H}$-valued random variable $h$ is a random vector if $P(h perp g)<1$ for all $gin mathcal{H}.$



    If $h_1, h_2, ldots$ is a sequence independent identically distributed of random vectors,
    then, almost surely, the closed span of the $h_i$ is equal to $mathcal{H}.$



    First we will need a lemma.



    Lemma 1
    Let $h$ be a random vector.
    There is a countable subset $A$ of $mathcal{H}$ such that the closed span of the elements of $A$ is equal to $mathcal{H}$
    and for every point $ain A,$ $P(hin U)>0$ for any neighborhood $U$ of $a.$



    Proof
    For any subset $A$ such that for every point $ain A,$ $P(hin U)>0$ for any neighborhood $U$ of $a,$ and
    the closed span of the elements of $A$ is not equal to $mathcal{H},$
    we will show that we can grow $A$ by a single element which is not in closed span of the elements of $A.$
    We can only do this a countable number of times because the Hilbert space dimension of $mathcal{H}$ is countable.
    (Otherwise, via Gram-Schmidt, we could construct an uncountable orthonormal set by transfinite induction.)



    Choose $g$ such that $g perp a$ for all $ain A.$ Now, $P(h perp g)<1.$ So there must be a point $b$ such that
    $P(hin U) >0$ for every neighborhood of $b$ and $b$ is not perpendicular to $g,$ therefore, $b$ is not in the span of the elements of $A.$ QED



    Suppose $h_1, h_2, ldots$ is a sequence independent identically distributed of random vectors.
    Let $A$ be as in Lemma 1. Index $A$ a a sequence $a_n.$
    Let $B_{m,n}$ be a ball of radius $1/m$ centered at $a_n$
    Almost surely, the sequence $h_i$ must visit $B_{m,n}$ infinitely often,
    as $P(h_iin B_{m,n})>0$. Therefore $A$ is a subset of the closure of the values of the sequence. (We have essentially the fact that a random function $f:mathbb{N}rightarrow mathbb{N}^2$ is surjective with infinite multiplicity.)






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      The point is that you "keep going" by transfinite induction. The process must stop at some countable ordinal before $omega_1$ as the space is countable dimensional.
      $endgroup$
      – J. E. Pascoe
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      That is for each $alpha < omega_1$ there would be $A_alpha$ such that if $alpha < beta,$ $A_alpha^perp cap A_beta neq {0}.$
      $endgroup$
      – J. E. Pascoe
      5 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      "Let $A$ be as in Lemma 1" ... "we may take $A$ to consist of only isolated points, as in a Polish space a countable closed set is equal to the closure of its isolated points." But Lemma 1 does not guarantee that $A$ is closed.
      $endgroup$
      – Iosif Pinelis
      5 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      That does seem to be a gap @IosifPinelis . Ideas for closing it?
      $endgroup$
      – J. E. Pascoe
      5 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      Could you elaborate a bit further on why the set $A$ in Lemma 1 is countable? Of course, there exist linearly independent sets in $H$ that are uncountable -- just choose your favourite Hamel basis of $H$.
      $endgroup$
      – Jochen Glueck
      5 hours ago














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f328585%2fdoes-a-random-sequence-of-vectors-span-a-hilbert-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    (This may turn out to be a simplified version of J. E. Pascoe's answer).



    With probability one, the closure of the random set $V = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$ is equal to $operatorname{supp} v$, the support of the distribution of $v$ ($operatorname{supp} v$ is the set of those $h$ such that $P(v in B(h, varepsilon)) > 0$ for every $varepsilon > 0$).



    For every $h$, we have $P(h perp v) < 1$, and therefore $h$ is not orthogonal to $operatorname{supp} v$. It follows that the closed span of $operatorname{supp} v$ is $mathcal{H}$.



    It remains to note that the closed span of $V$ is the same as the closed span of the closure of $V$, equal to $operatorname{supp} v$ with probability one.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      (This may turn out to be a simplified version of J. E. Pascoe's answer).



      With probability one, the closure of the random set $V = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$ is equal to $operatorname{supp} v$, the support of the distribution of $v$ ($operatorname{supp} v$ is the set of those $h$ such that $P(v in B(h, varepsilon)) > 0$ for every $varepsilon > 0$).



      For every $h$, we have $P(h perp v) < 1$, and therefore $h$ is not orthogonal to $operatorname{supp} v$. It follows that the closed span of $operatorname{supp} v$ is $mathcal{H}$.



      It remains to note that the closed span of $V$ is the same as the closed span of the closure of $V$, equal to $operatorname{supp} v$ with probability one.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        (This may turn out to be a simplified version of J. E. Pascoe's answer).



        With probability one, the closure of the random set $V = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$ is equal to $operatorname{supp} v$, the support of the distribution of $v$ ($operatorname{supp} v$ is the set of those $h$ such that $P(v in B(h, varepsilon)) > 0$ for every $varepsilon > 0$).



        For every $h$, we have $P(h perp v) < 1$, and therefore $h$ is not orthogonal to $operatorname{supp} v$. It follows that the closed span of $operatorname{supp} v$ is $mathcal{H}$.



        It remains to note that the closed span of $V$ is the same as the closed span of the closure of $V$, equal to $operatorname{supp} v$ with probability one.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        (This may turn out to be a simplified version of J. E. Pascoe's answer).



        With probability one, the closure of the random set $V = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$ is equal to $operatorname{supp} v$, the support of the distribution of $v$ ($operatorname{supp} v$ is the set of those $h$ such that $P(v in B(h, varepsilon)) > 0$ for every $varepsilon > 0$).



        For every $h$, we have $P(h perp v) < 1$, and therefore $h$ is not orthogonal to $operatorname{supp} v$. It follows that the closed span of $operatorname{supp} v$ is $mathcal{H}$.



        It remains to note that the closed span of $V$ is the same as the closed span of the closure of $V$, equal to $operatorname{supp} v$ with probability one.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        Mateusz KwaśnickiMateusz Kwaśnicki

        4,7421619




        4,7421619























            0












            $begingroup$

            Another Try



            We say a $mathcal{H}$-valued random variable $h$ is a random vector if $P(h perp g)<1$ for all $gin mathcal{H}.$



            If $h_1, h_2, ldots$ is a sequence independent identically distributed of random vectors,
            then, almost surely, the closed span of the $h_i$ is equal to $mathcal{H}.$



            First we will need a lemma.



            Lemma 1
            Let $h$ be a random vector.
            There is a countable subset $A$ of $mathcal{H}$ such that the closed span of the elements of $A$ is equal to $mathcal{H}$
            and for every point $ain A,$ $P(hin U)>0$ for any neighborhood $U$ of $a.$



            Proof
            For any subset $A$ such that for every point $ain A,$ $P(hin U)>0$ for any neighborhood $U$ of $a,$ and
            the closed span of the elements of $A$ is not equal to $mathcal{H},$
            we will show that we can grow $A$ by a single element which is not in closed span of the elements of $A.$
            We can only do this a countable number of times because the Hilbert space dimension of $mathcal{H}$ is countable.
            (Otherwise, via Gram-Schmidt, we could construct an uncountable orthonormal set by transfinite induction.)



            Choose $g$ such that $g perp a$ for all $ain A.$ Now, $P(h perp g)<1.$ So there must be a point $b$ such that
            $P(hin U) >0$ for every neighborhood of $b$ and $b$ is not perpendicular to $g,$ therefore, $b$ is not in the span of the elements of $A.$ QED



            Suppose $h_1, h_2, ldots$ is a sequence independent identically distributed of random vectors.
            Let $A$ be as in Lemma 1. Index $A$ a a sequence $a_n.$
            Let $B_{m,n}$ be a ball of radius $1/m$ centered at $a_n$
            Almost surely, the sequence $h_i$ must visit $B_{m,n}$ infinitely often,
            as $P(h_iin B_{m,n})>0$. Therefore $A$ is a subset of the closure of the values of the sequence. (We have essentially the fact that a random function $f:mathbb{N}rightarrow mathbb{N}^2$ is surjective with infinite multiplicity.)






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              The point is that you "keep going" by transfinite induction. The process must stop at some countable ordinal before $omega_1$ as the space is countable dimensional.
              $endgroup$
              – J. E. Pascoe
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              That is for each $alpha < omega_1$ there would be $A_alpha$ such that if $alpha < beta,$ $A_alpha^perp cap A_beta neq {0}.$
              $endgroup$
              – J. E. Pascoe
              5 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              "Let $A$ be as in Lemma 1" ... "we may take $A$ to consist of only isolated points, as in a Polish space a countable closed set is equal to the closure of its isolated points." But Lemma 1 does not guarantee that $A$ is closed.
              $endgroup$
              – Iosif Pinelis
              5 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              That does seem to be a gap @IosifPinelis . Ideas for closing it?
              $endgroup$
              – J. E. Pascoe
              5 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              Could you elaborate a bit further on why the set $A$ in Lemma 1 is countable? Of course, there exist linearly independent sets in $H$ that are uncountable -- just choose your favourite Hamel basis of $H$.
              $endgroup$
              – Jochen Glueck
              5 hours ago


















            0












            $begingroup$

            Another Try



            We say a $mathcal{H}$-valued random variable $h$ is a random vector if $P(h perp g)<1$ for all $gin mathcal{H}.$



            If $h_1, h_2, ldots$ is a sequence independent identically distributed of random vectors,
            then, almost surely, the closed span of the $h_i$ is equal to $mathcal{H}.$



            First we will need a lemma.



            Lemma 1
            Let $h$ be a random vector.
            There is a countable subset $A$ of $mathcal{H}$ such that the closed span of the elements of $A$ is equal to $mathcal{H}$
            and for every point $ain A,$ $P(hin U)>0$ for any neighborhood $U$ of $a.$



            Proof
            For any subset $A$ such that for every point $ain A,$ $P(hin U)>0$ for any neighborhood $U$ of $a,$ and
            the closed span of the elements of $A$ is not equal to $mathcal{H},$
            we will show that we can grow $A$ by a single element which is not in closed span of the elements of $A.$
            We can only do this a countable number of times because the Hilbert space dimension of $mathcal{H}$ is countable.
            (Otherwise, via Gram-Schmidt, we could construct an uncountable orthonormal set by transfinite induction.)



            Choose $g$ such that $g perp a$ for all $ain A.$ Now, $P(h perp g)<1.$ So there must be a point $b$ such that
            $P(hin U) >0$ for every neighborhood of $b$ and $b$ is not perpendicular to $g,$ therefore, $b$ is not in the span of the elements of $A.$ QED



            Suppose $h_1, h_2, ldots$ is a sequence independent identically distributed of random vectors.
            Let $A$ be as in Lemma 1. Index $A$ a a sequence $a_n.$
            Let $B_{m,n}$ be a ball of radius $1/m$ centered at $a_n$
            Almost surely, the sequence $h_i$ must visit $B_{m,n}$ infinitely often,
            as $P(h_iin B_{m,n})>0$. Therefore $A$ is a subset of the closure of the values of the sequence. (We have essentially the fact that a random function $f:mathbb{N}rightarrow mathbb{N}^2$ is surjective with infinite multiplicity.)






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              The point is that you "keep going" by transfinite induction. The process must stop at some countable ordinal before $omega_1$ as the space is countable dimensional.
              $endgroup$
              – J. E. Pascoe
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              That is for each $alpha < omega_1$ there would be $A_alpha$ such that if $alpha < beta,$ $A_alpha^perp cap A_beta neq {0}.$
              $endgroup$
              – J. E. Pascoe
              5 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              "Let $A$ be as in Lemma 1" ... "we may take $A$ to consist of only isolated points, as in a Polish space a countable closed set is equal to the closure of its isolated points." But Lemma 1 does not guarantee that $A$ is closed.
              $endgroup$
              – Iosif Pinelis
              5 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              That does seem to be a gap @IosifPinelis . Ideas for closing it?
              $endgroup$
              – J. E. Pascoe
              5 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              Could you elaborate a bit further on why the set $A$ in Lemma 1 is countable? Of course, there exist linearly independent sets in $H$ that are uncountable -- just choose your favourite Hamel basis of $H$.
              $endgroup$
              – Jochen Glueck
              5 hours ago
















            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Another Try



            We say a $mathcal{H}$-valued random variable $h$ is a random vector if $P(h perp g)<1$ for all $gin mathcal{H}.$



            If $h_1, h_2, ldots$ is a sequence independent identically distributed of random vectors,
            then, almost surely, the closed span of the $h_i$ is equal to $mathcal{H}.$



            First we will need a lemma.



            Lemma 1
            Let $h$ be a random vector.
            There is a countable subset $A$ of $mathcal{H}$ such that the closed span of the elements of $A$ is equal to $mathcal{H}$
            and for every point $ain A,$ $P(hin U)>0$ for any neighborhood $U$ of $a.$



            Proof
            For any subset $A$ such that for every point $ain A,$ $P(hin U)>0$ for any neighborhood $U$ of $a,$ and
            the closed span of the elements of $A$ is not equal to $mathcal{H},$
            we will show that we can grow $A$ by a single element which is not in closed span of the elements of $A.$
            We can only do this a countable number of times because the Hilbert space dimension of $mathcal{H}$ is countable.
            (Otherwise, via Gram-Schmidt, we could construct an uncountable orthonormal set by transfinite induction.)



            Choose $g$ such that $g perp a$ for all $ain A.$ Now, $P(h perp g)<1.$ So there must be a point $b$ such that
            $P(hin U) >0$ for every neighborhood of $b$ and $b$ is not perpendicular to $g,$ therefore, $b$ is not in the span of the elements of $A.$ QED



            Suppose $h_1, h_2, ldots$ is a sequence independent identically distributed of random vectors.
            Let $A$ be as in Lemma 1. Index $A$ a a sequence $a_n.$
            Let $B_{m,n}$ be a ball of radius $1/m$ centered at $a_n$
            Almost surely, the sequence $h_i$ must visit $B_{m,n}$ infinitely often,
            as $P(h_iin B_{m,n})>0$. Therefore $A$ is a subset of the closure of the values of the sequence. (We have essentially the fact that a random function $f:mathbb{N}rightarrow mathbb{N}^2$ is surjective with infinite multiplicity.)






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Another Try



            We say a $mathcal{H}$-valued random variable $h$ is a random vector if $P(h perp g)<1$ for all $gin mathcal{H}.$



            If $h_1, h_2, ldots$ is a sequence independent identically distributed of random vectors,
            then, almost surely, the closed span of the $h_i$ is equal to $mathcal{H}.$



            First we will need a lemma.



            Lemma 1
            Let $h$ be a random vector.
            There is a countable subset $A$ of $mathcal{H}$ such that the closed span of the elements of $A$ is equal to $mathcal{H}$
            and for every point $ain A,$ $P(hin U)>0$ for any neighborhood $U$ of $a.$



            Proof
            For any subset $A$ such that for every point $ain A,$ $P(hin U)>0$ for any neighborhood $U$ of $a,$ and
            the closed span of the elements of $A$ is not equal to $mathcal{H},$
            we will show that we can grow $A$ by a single element which is not in closed span of the elements of $A.$
            We can only do this a countable number of times because the Hilbert space dimension of $mathcal{H}$ is countable.
            (Otherwise, via Gram-Schmidt, we could construct an uncountable orthonormal set by transfinite induction.)



            Choose $g$ such that $g perp a$ for all $ain A.$ Now, $P(h perp g)<1.$ So there must be a point $b$ such that
            $P(hin U) >0$ for every neighborhood of $b$ and $b$ is not perpendicular to $g,$ therefore, $b$ is not in the span of the elements of $A.$ QED



            Suppose $h_1, h_2, ldots$ is a sequence independent identically distributed of random vectors.
            Let $A$ be as in Lemma 1. Index $A$ a a sequence $a_n.$
            Let $B_{m,n}$ be a ball of radius $1/m$ centered at $a_n$
            Almost surely, the sequence $h_i$ must visit $B_{m,n}$ infinitely often,
            as $P(h_iin B_{m,n})>0$. Therefore $A$ is a subset of the closure of the values of the sequence. (We have essentially the fact that a random function $f:mathbb{N}rightarrow mathbb{N}^2$ is surjective with infinite multiplicity.)







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 4 hours ago

























            answered 6 hours ago









            J. E. PascoeJ. E. Pascoe

            570316




            570316












            • $begingroup$
              The point is that you "keep going" by transfinite induction. The process must stop at some countable ordinal before $omega_1$ as the space is countable dimensional.
              $endgroup$
              – J. E. Pascoe
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              That is for each $alpha < omega_1$ there would be $A_alpha$ such that if $alpha < beta,$ $A_alpha^perp cap A_beta neq {0}.$
              $endgroup$
              – J. E. Pascoe
              5 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              "Let $A$ be as in Lemma 1" ... "we may take $A$ to consist of only isolated points, as in a Polish space a countable closed set is equal to the closure of its isolated points." But Lemma 1 does not guarantee that $A$ is closed.
              $endgroup$
              – Iosif Pinelis
              5 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              That does seem to be a gap @IosifPinelis . Ideas for closing it?
              $endgroup$
              – J. E. Pascoe
              5 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              Could you elaborate a bit further on why the set $A$ in Lemma 1 is countable? Of course, there exist linearly independent sets in $H$ that are uncountable -- just choose your favourite Hamel basis of $H$.
              $endgroup$
              – Jochen Glueck
              5 hours ago




















            • $begingroup$
              The point is that you "keep going" by transfinite induction. The process must stop at some countable ordinal before $omega_1$ as the space is countable dimensional.
              $endgroup$
              – J. E. Pascoe
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              That is for each $alpha < omega_1$ there would be $A_alpha$ such that if $alpha < beta,$ $A_alpha^perp cap A_beta neq {0}.$
              $endgroup$
              – J. E. Pascoe
              5 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              "Let $A$ be as in Lemma 1" ... "we may take $A$ to consist of only isolated points, as in a Polish space a countable closed set is equal to the closure of its isolated points." But Lemma 1 does not guarantee that $A$ is closed.
              $endgroup$
              – Iosif Pinelis
              5 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              That does seem to be a gap @IosifPinelis . Ideas for closing it?
              $endgroup$
              – J. E. Pascoe
              5 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              Could you elaborate a bit further on why the set $A$ in Lemma 1 is countable? Of course, there exist linearly independent sets in $H$ that are uncountable -- just choose your favourite Hamel basis of $H$.
              $endgroup$
              – Jochen Glueck
              5 hours ago


















            $begingroup$
            The point is that you "keep going" by transfinite induction. The process must stop at some countable ordinal before $omega_1$ as the space is countable dimensional.
            $endgroup$
            – J. E. Pascoe
            5 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            The point is that you "keep going" by transfinite induction. The process must stop at some countable ordinal before $omega_1$ as the space is countable dimensional.
            $endgroup$
            – J. E. Pascoe
            5 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            That is for each $alpha < omega_1$ there would be $A_alpha$ such that if $alpha < beta,$ $A_alpha^perp cap A_beta neq {0}.$
            $endgroup$
            – J. E. Pascoe
            5 hours ago






            $begingroup$
            That is for each $alpha < omega_1$ there would be $A_alpha$ such that if $alpha < beta,$ $A_alpha^perp cap A_beta neq {0}.$
            $endgroup$
            – J. E. Pascoe
            5 hours ago














            $begingroup$
            "Let $A$ be as in Lemma 1" ... "we may take $A$ to consist of only isolated points, as in a Polish space a countable closed set is equal to the closure of its isolated points." But Lemma 1 does not guarantee that $A$ is closed.
            $endgroup$
            – Iosif Pinelis
            5 hours ago






            $begingroup$
            "Let $A$ be as in Lemma 1" ... "we may take $A$ to consist of only isolated points, as in a Polish space a countable closed set is equal to the closure of its isolated points." But Lemma 1 does not guarantee that $A$ is closed.
            $endgroup$
            – Iosif Pinelis
            5 hours ago














            $begingroup$
            That does seem to be a gap @IosifPinelis . Ideas for closing it?
            $endgroup$
            – J. E. Pascoe
            5 hours ago






            $begingroup$
            That does seem to be a gap @IosifPinelis . Ideas for closing it?
            $endgroup$
            – J. E. Pascoe
            5 hours ago














            $begingroup$
            Could you elaborate a bit further on why the set $A$ in Lemma 1 is countable? Of course, there exist linearly independent sets in $H$ that are uncountable -- just choose your favourite Hamel basis of $H$.
            $endgroup$
            – Jochen Glueck
            5 hours ago






            $begingroup$
            Could you elaborate a bit further on why the set $A$ in Lemma 1 is countable? Of course, there exist linearly independent sets in $H$ that are uncountable -- just choose your favourite Hamel basis of $H$.
            $endgroup$
            – Jochen Glueck
            5 hours ago




















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f328585%2fdoes-a-random-sequence-of-vectors-span-a-hilbert-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll? Announcing the arrival of...

            Couldn't open a raw socket. Error: Permission denied (13) (nmap)Is it possible to run networking commands...

            VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...