Relationship between sampajanna definitions in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35What is the difference between Karma and...

Brexit - No Deal Rejection

How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?

Instead of a Universal Basic Income program, why not implement a "Universal Basic Needs" program?

World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?

Happy pi day, everyone!

What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?

Is it possible to configure Nginx to accept requests both with and without proxy protocol to the same URL?

What options are left, if Britain cannot decide?

Do the common programs (for example: "ls", "cat") in Linux and BSD come from the same source code?

Violin - Can double stops be played when the strings are not next to each other?

How to make healing in an exploration game interesting

Relationship between sampajanna definitions in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35

What is "focus distance lower/upper" and how is it different from depth of field?

Could the Saturn V actually have launched astronauts around Venus?

A single argument pattern definition applies to multiple-argument patterns?

Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?

What is the adequate fee for a reveal operation?

I got the following comment from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?

Is it good practice to use Linear Least-Squares with SMA?

What is a ^ b and (a & b) << 1?

Why one should not leave fingerprints on bulbs and plugs?

Is a party consisting of only a bard, a cleric, and a warlock functional long-term?

About the actual radiative impact of greenhouse gas emission over time

Different outputs for `w`, `who`, `whoami` and `id`



Relationship between sampajanna definitions in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35


What is the difference between Karma and SanskaraThe relation between the three types of dukkhaDifference between Pacceka Buddha and Arahant?What are the differences between meritorious acts and wholesome acts?What does the word 'nimitta' ('sign') refer to in SN 47.8?Delayed speech as right speechCan someone explain the difference classification and referencing between english tipitaka and thai tipitaka?Lord Buddha and ChakravartinDifference between aggregates and clinging-aggregates?Difference between sati and sampajanna













1















What is the relationship between the definitions of sampajañña (clear comprehension) in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35?



From SN 47.35 (translated by Bodhi):




“And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here,
bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
comprehension.




From SN 47.2 (translated by Bodhi):




“And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here,
bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
comprehension.











share|improve this question



























    1















    What is the relationship between the definitions of sampajañña (clear comprehension) in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35?



    From SN 47.35 (translated by Bodhi):




    “And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here,
    bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
    understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
    Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
    present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
    they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
    away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
    comprehension.




    From SN 47.2 (translated by Bodhi):




    “And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here,
    bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
    going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
    when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
    carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
    food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
    standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
    silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
    comprehension.











    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1








      What is the relationship between the definitions of sampajañña (clear comprehension) in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35?



      From SN 47.35 (translated by Bodhi):




      “And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here,
      bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
      understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
      Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
      present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
      they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
      away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
      comprehension.




      From SN 47.2 (translated by Bodhi):




      “And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here,
      bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
      going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
      when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
      carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
      food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
      standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
      silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
      comprehension.











      share|improve this question














      What is the relationship between the definitions of sampajañña (clear comprehension) in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35?



      From SN 47.35 (translated by Bodhi):




      “And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here,
      bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
      understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
      Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
      present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
      they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
      away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
      comprehension.




      From SN 47.2 (translated by Bodhi):




      “And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here,
      bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
      going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
      when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
      carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
      food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
      standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
      silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
      comprehension.








      pali-canon sampajana






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 51 mins ago









      ruben2020ruben2020

      15.7k31243




      15.7k31243






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          In line with what I said in my other answer, both are descriptions of self-awareness, of not getting carried away by the circumstances.



          This does not refer to "zombie bare awareness" executed mechanically, but to normal, pragmatic, careful self-awareness of an intelligent person.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Yes, unfortunately, a lot of modern mindfulness teachers seem to be teaching it wrongly. They teach "Be aware in the present moment and simply observe X without judging" when it should be "Don't forget to keep observing X and thoroughly understanding the arising, changing and ceasing of X without judging", where X refers to body, feelings, thoughts and phenomena, and "without judging" means actively removing greed and aversion.

            – ruben2020
            34 mins ago













          • Yup. Not just arising/ceasing and removing greed/aversion, but also seeing any biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion etc.

            – Andrei Volkov
            14 mins ago





















          1















          And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
          understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
          Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
          present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
          they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
          away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
          comprehension.



          SN 47.35




          The above means feelings, perceptions & thoughts are clearly understood in terms of the Dhamma, namely, they are impermanent, not-self, not to be clung to.



          Note: This is not vipassana, namely, observing arising & passing of feelings, perceptions & thoughts. It is understanding feelings, perceptions & thoughts, including when they are purposefully used. Thus, when speaking to another, for example, the mind understands: "These thoughts are conventions, subjective, not to be clung to, etc".




          And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
          going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
          when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
          carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
          food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
          standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
          silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
          comprehension.



          SN 47.2




          The above is exactly the same. When walking, the monk has clear-comprehension, such as: "I am monk; I must walk so I make a good public impression" or the monk reflects: "This walking is not self" (such as when Rahula was walking behind the Buddha in MN 62 and the Buddha rebuked Rahula for regarding the Buddha as a "self" or with "beauty").






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "565"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31566%2frelationship-between-sampajanna-definitions-in-sn-47-2-and-sn-47-35%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            In line with what I said in my other answer, both are descriptions of self-awareness, of not getting carried away by the circumstances.



            This does not refer to "zombie bare awareness" executed mechanically, but to normal, pragmatic, careful self-awareness of an intelligent person.






            share|improve this answer
























            • Yes, unfortunately, a lot of modern mindfulness teachers seem to be teaching it wrongly. They teach "Be aware in the present moment and simply observe X without judging" when it should be "Don't forget to keep observing X and thoroughly understanding the arising, changing and ceasing of X without judging", where X refers to body, feelings, thoughts and phenomena, and "without judging" means actively removing greed and aversion.

              – ruben2020
              34 mins ago













            • Yup. Not just arising/ceasing and removing greed/aversion, but also seeing any biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion etc.

              – Andrei Volkov
              14 mins ago


















            2














            In line with what I said in my other answer, both are descriptions of self-awareness, of not getting carried away by the circumstances.



            This does not refer to "zombie bare awareness" executed mechanically, but to normal, pragmatic, careful self-awareness of an intelligent person.






            share|improve this answer
























            • Yes, unfortunately, a lot of modern mindfulness teachers seem to be teaching it wrongly. They teach "Be aware in the present moment and simply observe X without judging" when it should be "Don't forget to keep observing X and thoroughly understanding the arising, changing and ceasing of X without judging", where X refers to body, feelings, thoughts and phenomena, and "without judging" means actively removing greed and aversion.

              – ruben2020
              34 mins ago













            • Yup. Not just arising/ceasing and removing greed/aversion, but also seeing any biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion etc.

              – Andrei Volkov
              14 mins ago
















            2












            2








            2







            In line with what I said in my other answer, both are descriptions of self-awareness, of not getting carried away by the circumstances.



            This does not refer to "zombie bare awareness" executed mechanically, but to normal, pragmatic, careful self-awareness of an intelligent person.






            share|improve this answer













            In line with what I said in my other answer, both are descriptions of self-awareness, of not getting carried away by the circumstances.



            This does not refer to "zombie bare awareness" executed mechanically, but to normal, pragmatic, careful self-awareness of an intelligent person.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 44 mins ago









            Andrei VolkovAndrei Volkov

            38.9k331110




            38.9k331110













            • Yes, unfortunately, a lot of modern mindfulness teachers seem to be teaching it wrongly. They teach "Be aware in the present moment and simply observe X without judging" when it should be "Don't forget to keep observing X and thoroughly understanding the arising, changing and ceasing of X without judging", where X refers to body, feelings, thoughts and phenomena, and "without judging" means actively removing greed and aversion.

              – ruben2020
              34 mins ago













            • Yup. Not just arising/ceasing and removing greed/aversion, but also seeing any biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion etc.

              – Andrei Volkov
              14 mins ago





















            • Yes, unfortunately, a lot of modern mindfulness teachers seem to be teaching it wrongly. They teach "Be aware in the present moment and simply observe X without judging" when it should be "Don't forget to keep observing X and thoroughly understanding the arising, changing and ceasing of X without judging", where X refers to body, feelings, thoughts and phenomena, and "without judging" means actively removing greed and aversion.

              – ruben2020
              34 mins ago













            • Yup. Not just arising/ceasing and removing greed/aversion, but also seeing any biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion etc.

              – Andrei Volkov
              14 mins ago



















            Yes, unfortunately, a lot of modern mindfulness teachers seem to be teaching it wrongly. They teach "Be aware in the present moment and simply observe X without judging" when it should be "Don't forget to keep observing X and thoroughly understanding the arising, changing and ceasing of X without judging", where X refers to body, feelings, thoughts and phenomena, and "without judging" means actively removing greed and aversion.

            – ruben2020
            34 mins ago







            Yes, unfortunately, a lot of modern mindfulness teachers seem to be teaching it wrongly. They teach "Be aware in the present moment and simply observe X without judging" when it should be "Don't forget to keep observing X and thoroughly understanding the arising, changing and ceasing of X without judging", where X refers to body, feelings, thoughts and phenomena, and "without judging" means actively removing greed and aversion.

            – ruben2020
            34 mins ago















            Yup. Not just arising/ceasing and removing greed/aversion, but also seeing any biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion etc.

            – Andrei Volkov
            14 mins ago







            Yup. Not just arising/ceasing and removing greed/aversion, but also seeing any biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion etc.

            – Andrei Volkov
            14 mins ago













            1















            And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
            understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
            Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
            present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
            they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
            away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
            comprehension.



            SN 47.35




            The above means feelings, perceptions & thoughts are clearly understood in terms of the Dhamma, namely, they are impermanent, not-self, not to be clung to.



            Note: This is not vipassana, namely, observing arising & passing of feelings, perceptions & thoughts. It is understanding feelings, perceptions & thoughts, including when they are purposefully used. Thus, when speaking to another, for example, the mind understands: "These thoughts are conventions, subjective, not to be clung to, etc".




            And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
            going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
            when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
            carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
            food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
            standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
            silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
            comprehension.



            SN 47.2




            The above is exactly the same. When walking, the monk has clear-comprehension, such as: "I am monk; I must walk so I make a good public impression" or the monk reflects: "This walking is not self" (such as when Rahula was walking behind the Buddha in MN 62 and the Buddha rebuked Rahula for regarding the Buddha as a "self" or with "beauty").






            share|improve this answer




























              1















              And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
              understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
              Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
              present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
              they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
              away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
              comprehension.



              SN 47.35




              The above means feelings, perceptions & thoughts are clearly understood in terms of the Dhamma, namely, they are impermanent, not-self, not to be clung to.



              Note: This is not vipassana, namely, observing arising & passing of feelings, perceptions & thoughts. It is understanding feelings, perceptions & thoughts, including when they are purposefully used. Thus, when speaking to another, for example, the mind understands: "These thoughts are conventions, subjective, not to be clung to, etc".




              And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
              going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
              when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
              carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
              food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
              standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
              silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
              comprehension.



              SN 47.2




              The above is exactly the same. When walking, the monk has clear-comprehension, such as: "I am monk; I must walk so I make a good public impression" or the monk reflects: "This walking is not self" (such as when Rahula was walking behind the Buddha in MN 62 and the Buddha rebuked Rahula for regarding the Buddha as a "self" or with "beauty").






              share|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1








                And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
                understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
                Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
                present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
                they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
                away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
                comprehension.



                SN 47.35




                The above means feelings, perceptions & thoughts are clearly understood in terms of the Dhamma, namely, they are impermanent, not-self, not to be clung to.



                Note: This is not vipassana, namely, observing arising & passing of feelings, perceptions & thoughts. It is understanding feelings, perceptions & thoughts, including when they are purposefully used. Thus, when speaking to another, for example, the mind understands: "These thoughts are conventions, subjective, not to be clung to, etc".




                And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
                going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
                when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
                carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
                food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
                standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
                silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
                comprehension.



                SN 47.2




                The above is exactly the same. When walking, the monk has clear-comprehension, such as: "I am monk; I must walk so I make a good public impression" or the monk reflects: "This walking is not self" (such as when Rahula was walking behind the Buddha in MN 62 and the Buddha rebuked Rahula for regarding the Buddha as a "self" or with "beauty").






                share|improve this answer














                And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
                understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
                Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
                present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
                they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
                away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
                comprehension.



                SN 47.35




                The above means feelings, perceptions & thoughts are clearly understood in terms of the Dhamma, namely, they are impermanent, not-self, not to be clung to.



                Note: This is not vipassana, namely, observing arising & passing of feelings, perceptions & thoughts. It is understanding feelings, perceptions & thoughts, including when they are purposefully used. Thus, when speaking to another, for example, the mind understands: "These thoughts are conventions, subjective, not to be clung to, etc".




                And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
                going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
                when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
                carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
                food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
                standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
                silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
                comprehension.



                SN 47.2




                The above is exactly the same. When walking, the monk has clear-comprehension, such as: "I am monk; I must walk so I make a good public impression" or the monk reflects: "This walking is not self" (such as when Rahula was walking behind the Buddha in MN 62 and the Buddha rebuked Rahula for regarding the Buddha as a "self" or with "beauty").







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 15 mins ago









                DhammadhatuDhammadhatu

                25.4k11044




                25.4k11044






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Buddhism Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31566%2frelationship-between-sampajanna-definitions-in-sn-47-2-and-sn-47-35%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll? Announcing the arrival of...

                    Couldn't open a raw socket. Error: Permission denied (13) (nmap)Is it possible to run networking commands...

                    VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...