Why are the trig functions versine, haversine, exsecant, etc, rarely used in modern mathematics? ...
For a new assistant professor in CS, how to build/manage a publication pipeline
Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?
Is there such thing as an Availability Group failover trigger?
Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?
An adverb for when you're not exaggerating
How would a mousetrap for use in space work?
Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?
Uniqueness of spanning tree on a grid.
Is CEO the profession with the most psychopaths?
Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?
Do jazz musicians improvise on the parent scale in addition to the chord-scales?
How to convince students of the implication truth values?
Why are both D and D# fitting into my E minor key?
Around usage results
Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?
What are the out-of-universe reasons for the references to Toby Maguire-era Spider-Man in ITSV
Is it cost-effective to upgrade an old-ish Giant Escape R3 commuter bike with entry-level branded parts (wheels, drivetrain)?
What is the longest distance a player character can jump in one leap?
Trademark violation for app?
How can I use the Python library networkx from Mathematica?
What's the meaning of "fortified infraction restraint"?
Is it ethical to give a final exam after the professor has quit before teaching the remaining chapters of the course?
Do square wave exist?
Maximum summed powersets with non-adjacent items
Why are the trig functions versine, haversine, exsecant, etc, rarely used in modern mathematics?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Why do hyperbolic “trig” functions seem to be encountered rarely?When was the term “mathematics” first used?Why are trig functions defined for the unit circle?What are the formal terms for the intersection points of the geometric representation of the extended trigonometric functions?Why are the power series for trig functions in radians?Why are turns not used as the default angle measure?Why are the Trig functions defined by the counterclockwise path of a circle?How (or why) did Topology become so central to modern mathematics?Determining compositions of trig functions by knowing Euler's identity etcwhich trig identities are used here?
$begingroup$
I was browsing through a Wikipedia article about the trigonometric identities, when I came across something that caught my attention, namely forgotten trigonometric functions.
The versine (arguably the most basic of the functions), coversine, haversine and exosecant formulas had once been utilised for navigational purposes, prior to GPS tracking systems. However, recently, they have become less common in modern mathematics and beyond. Why is that?
Here is a link to a PDF file describing all of these now-obsolete trig functions: "The Forgotten Trigonometric Functions, or
How Trigonometry was used in the Ancient Art of Navigation (Before GPS!)"
trigonometry math-history spherical-trigonometry
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was browsing through a Wikipedia article about the trigonometric identities, when I came across something that caught my attention, namely forgotten trigonometric functions.
The versine (arguably the most basic of the functions), coversine, haversine and exosecant formulas had once been utilised for navigational purposes, prior to GPS tracking systems. However, recently, they have become less common in modern mathematics and beyond. Why is that?
Here is a link to a PDF file describing all of these now-obsolete trig functions: "The Forgotten Trigonometric Functions, or
How Trigonometry was used in the Ancient Art of Navigation (Before GPS!)"
trigonometry math-history spherical-trigonometry
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was browsing through a Wikipedia article about the trigonometric identities, when I came across something that caught my attention, namely forgotten trigonometric functions.
The versine (arguably the most basic of the functions), coversine, haversine and exosecant formulas had once been utilised for navigational purposes, prior to GPS tracking systems. However, recently, they have become less common in modern mathematics and beyond. Why is that?
Here is a link to a PDF file describing all of these now-obsolete trig functions: "The Forgotten Trigonometric Functions, or
How Trigonometry was used in the Ancient Art of Navigation (Before GPS!)"
trigonometry math-history spherical-trigonometry
New contributor
$endgroup$
I was browsing through a Wikipedia article about the trigonometric identities, when I came across something that caught my attention, namely forgotten trigonometric functions.
The versine (arguably the most basic of the functions), coversine, haversine and exosecant formulas had once been utilised for navigational purposes, prior to GPS tracking systems. However, recently, they have become less common in modern mathematics and beyond. Why is that?
Here is a link to a PDF file describing all of these now-obsolete trig functions: "The Forgotten Trigonometric Functions, or
How Trigonometry was used in the Ancient Art of Navigation (Before GPS!)"
trigonometry math-history spherical-trigonometry
trigonometry math-history spherical-trigonometry
New contributor
New contributor
edited 9 hours ago
Daniele Tampieri
2,75721022
2,75721022
New contributor
asked 16 hours ago
Quantum EntanglementQuantum Entanglement
16517
16517
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Those functions are much less used than before for one reason: the advent of electronic computers.
Before that, one had to rely either on tables or on slide rules. Tables were usually table of logarithms, and they included the logarithms of trigonometric functions as well. The trigonometric functions were then useful not only for geometric applications, but also to simplify algebraic calculations with logarithms.
For instance, to compute $logsqrt{a^2+b^2}$ when $log a$ and $log b$ are known, you could find $theta$ such that $logtantheta=logfrac ba=log b-log a$, then $logsqrt{a^2+b^2}=log a+logsqrt{1+tan^2theta}$ and $logsqrt{1+tan^2theta}=logfrac{1}{cos theta}=-logcostheta$. There are many similar formulas.
For geometric applications, sometimes versine and similar functions allow computing with greater precision while not adding too much computation. See for instance the haversine formula used to compute great circle distance (useful in navigation). The straightforward formula with arccosine has poor accuracy when the angle is small (the most common case), due to the fact that cosine is flat at $0$. However the formula with haversine is more accurate. To achieve the same, you would have to use $sin^2(theta/2)$ everywhere, which require more computations (but it's still reasonable with logarithms). Therefore, navigation table like Nories's nautical tables have an haversine table.
Note that tables of logarithms are usually accurate up to 5 digits (some larger tables had 7 digits, some very special ones had better precision but were difficult to use : more digits = much more space on paper). Slide rules have roughly 3 digits of precision.
All of this is rendered pretty useless with calculators, which have usually around 15 digits of precision and compute fast enough that we don't have to worry about speeding things up with extra functions.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
The log tables we used at school were four figure. I repeatedly got marked down (indirectly) for using five figure tables: I gave my answers to four figure precision, rather than the three I should have done if I were using four figure tables
$endgroup$
– JCRM
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JCRM I have never used tables at school, but the most common ones in France in the 60s-70s (Bouvart et Ratinet) were with 5 digits. This format dates back at least to the 19th century (Hoüel or Dupuis tables for instance). Tables with 4 digits would have been very small (2 pages), maybe for an exam where the teacher does not want to check for "additional" content in larger table (one of my tables has such hand written addition). I also have the 1948 IGN tables (8 digits), but they are much more painful (you need higher order interpolation).
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Oddly enough, I bought a log book 5 years back. I have no idea what my 11 year old self was thinking, but it was pretty cool.
$endgroup$
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MohammadZuhairKhan That's more or less my age when I stumble of my father's log table. Pretty cool indeed (though I remember I was surprised by exponent-mantissa notation which makes computation so easy with decimal logs). I think I have around twenty tables now. I can't really call this a collection, it's just that I am amazed when I find a new one, I can't resist :) Thinking of the incredible amount of work to compute with the table back then (let alone to compute the table), compared to what a computer can do know.
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Just re-opened the log table. 6 digits of accuracy for logs, anti-logs, trig functions, log of trig functions and so much more at 47 cents in the US. 61 pages including "some" formula and useful data.
$endgroup$
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
12 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3190922%2fwhy-are-the-trig-functions-versine-haversine-exsecant-etc-rarely-used-in-mod%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Those functions are much less used than before for one reason: the advent of electronic computers.
Before that, one had to rely either on tables or on slide rules. Tables were usually table of logarithms, and they included the logarithms of trigonometric functions as well. The trigonometric functions were then useful not only for geometric applications, but also to simplify algebraic calculations with logarithms.
For instance, to compute $logsqrt{a^2+b^2}$ when $log a$ and $log b$ are known, you could find $theta$ such that $logtantheta=logfrac ba=log b-log a$, then $logsqrt{a^2+b^2}=log a+logsqrt{1+tan^2theta}$ and $logsqrt{1+tan^2theta}=logfrac{1}{cos theta}=-logcostheta$. There are many similar formulas.
For geometric applications, sometimes versine and similar functions allow computing with greater precision while not adding too much computation. See for instance the haversine formula used to compute great circle distance (useful in navigation). The straightforward formula with arccosine has poor accuracy when the angle is small (the most common case), due to the fact that cosine is flat at $0$. However the formula with haversine is more accurate. To achieve the same, you would have to use $sin^2(theta/2)$ everywhere, which require more computations (but it's still reasonable with logarithms). Therefore, navigation table like Nories's nautical tables have an haversine table.
Note that tables of logarithms are usually accurate up to 5 digits (some larger tables had 7 digits, some very special ones had better precision but were difficult to use : more digits = much more space on paper). Slide rules have roughly 3 digits of precision.
All of this is rendered pretty useless with calculators, which have usually around 15 digits of precision and compute fast enough that we don't have to worry about speeding things up with extra functions.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
The log tables we used at school were four figure. I repeatedly got marked down (indirectly) for using five figure tables: I gave my answers to four figure precision, rather than the three I should have done if I were using four figure tables
$endgroup$
– JCRM
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JCRM I have never used tables at school, but the most common ones in France in the 60s-70s (Bouvart et Ratinet) were with 5 digits. This format dates back at least to the 19th century (Hoüel or Dupuis tables for instance). Tables with 4 digits would have been very small (2 pages), maybe for an exam where the teacher does not want to check for "additional" content in larger table (one of my tables has such hand written addition). I also have the 1948 IGN tables (8 digits), but they are much more painful (you need higher order interpolation).
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Oddly enough, I bought a log book 5 years back. I have no idea what my 11 year old self was thinking, but it was pretty cool.
$endgroup$
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MohammadZuhairKhan That's more or less my age when I stumble of my father's log table. Pretty cool indeed (though I remember I was surprised by exponent-mantissa notation which makes computation so easy with decimal logs). I think I have around twenty tables now. I can't really call this a collection, it's just that I am amazed when I find a new one, I can't resist :) Thinking of the incredible amount of work to compute with the table back then (let alone to compute the table), compared to what a computer can do know.
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Just re-opened the log table. 6 digits of accuracy for logs, anti-logs, trig functions, log of trig functions and so much more at 47 cents in the US. 61 pages including "some" formula and useful data.
$endgroup$
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
12 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Those functions are much less used than before for one reason: the advent of electronic computers.
Before that, one had to rely either on tables or on slide rules. Tables were usually table of logarithms, and they included the logarithms of trigonometric functions as well. The trigonometric functions were then useful not only for geometric applications, but also to simplify algebraic calculations with logarithms.
For instance, to compute $logsqrt{a^2+b^2}$ when $log a$ and $log b$ are known, you could find $theta$ such that $logtantheta=logfrac ba=log b-log a$, then $logsqrt{a^2+b^2}=log a+logsqrt{1+tan^2theta}$ and $logsqrt{1+tan^2theta}=logfrac{1}{cos theta}=-logcostheta$. There are many similar formulas.
For geometric applications, sometimes versine and similar functions allow computing with greater precision while not adding too much computation. See for instance the haversine formula used to compute great circle distance (useful in navigation). The straightforward formula with arccosine has poor accuracy when the angle is small (the most common case), due to the fact that cosine is flat at $0$. However the formula with haversine is more accurate. To achieve the same, you would have to use $sin^2(theta/2)$ everywhere, which require more computations (but it's still reasonable with logarithms). Therefore, navigation table like Nories's nautical tables have an haversine table.
Note that tables of logarithms are usually accurate up to 5 digits (some larger tables had 7 digits, some very special ones had better precision but were difficult to use : more digits = much more space on paper). Slide rules have roughly 3 digits of precision.
All of this is rendered pretty useless with calculators, which have usually around 15 digits of precision and compute fast enough that we don't have to worry about speeding things up with extra functions.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
The log tables we used at school were four figure. I repeatedly got marked down (indirectly) for using five figure tables: I gave my answers to four figure precision, rather than the three I should have done if I were using four figure tables
$endgroup$
– JCRM
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JCRM I have never used tables at school, but the most common ones in France in the 60s-70s (Bouvart et Ratinet) were with 5 digits. This format dates back at least to the 19th century (Hoüel or Dupuis tables for instance). Tables with 4 digits would have been very small (2 pages), maybe for an exam where the teacher does not want to check for "additional" content in larger table (one of my tables has such hand written addition). I also have the 1948 IGN tables (8 digits), but they are much more painful (you need higher order interpolation).
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Oddly enough, I bought a log book 5 years back. I have no idea what my 11 year old self was thinking, but it was pretty cool.
$endgroup$
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MohammadZuhairKhan That's more or less my age when I stumble of my father's log table. Pretty cool indeed (though I remember I was surprised by exponent-mantissa notation which makes computation so easy with decimal logs). I think I have around twenty tables now. I can't really call this a collection, it's just that I am amazed when I find a new one, I can't resist :) Thinking of the incredible amount of work to compute with the table back then (let alone to compute the table), compared to what a computer can do know.
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Just re-opened the log table. 6 digits of accuracy for logs, anti-logs, trig functions, log of trig functions and so much more at 47 cents in the US. 61 pages including "some" formula and useful data.
$endgroup$
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
12 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Those functions are much less used than before for one reason: the advent of electronic computers.
Before that, one had to rely either on tables or on slide rules. Tables were usually table of logarithms, and they included the logarithms of trigonometric functions as well. The trigonometric functions were then useful not only for geometric applications, but also to simplify algebraic calculations with logarithms.
For instance, to compute $logsqrt{a^2+b^2}$ when $log a$ and $log b$ are known, you could find $theta$ such that $logtantheta=logfrac ba=log b-log a$, then $logsqrt{a^2+b^2}=log a+logsqrt{1+tan^2theta}$ and $logsqrt{1+tan^2theta}=logfrac{1}{cos theta}=-logcostheta$. There are many similar formulas.
For geometric applications, sometimes versine and similar functions allow computing with greater precision while not adding too much computation. See for instance the haversine formula used to compute great circle distance (useful in navigation). The straightforward formula with arccosine has poor accuracy when the angle is small (the most common case), due to the fact that cosine is flat at $0$. However the formula with haversine is more accurate. To achieve the same, you would have to use $sin^2(theta/2)$ everywhere, which require more computations (but it's still reasonable with logarithms). Therefore, navigation table like Nories's nautical tables have an haversine table.
Note that tables of logarithms are usually accurate up to 5 digits (some larger tables had 7 digits, some very special ones had better precision but were difficult to use : more digits = much more space on paper). Slide rules have roughly 3 digits of precision.
All of this is rendered pretty useless with calculators, which have usually around 15 digits of precision and compute fast enough that we don't have to worry about speeding things up with extra functions.
$endgroup$
Those functions are much less used than before for one reason: the advent of electronic computers.
Before that, one had to rely either on tables or on slide rules. Tables were usually table of logarithms, and they included the logarithms of trigonometric functions as well. The trigonometric functions were then useful not only for geometric applications, but also to simplify algebraic calculations with logarithms.
For instance, to compute $logsqrt{a^2+b^2}$ when $log a$ and $log b$ are known, you could find $theta$ such that $logtantheta=logfrac ba=log b-log a$, then $logsqrt{a^2+b^2}=log a+logsqrt{1+tan^2theta}$ and $logsqrt{1+tan^2theta}=logfrac{1}{cos theta}=-logcostheta$. There are many similar formulas.
For geometric applications, sometimes versine and similar functions allow computing with greater precision while not adding too much computation. See for instance the haversine formula used to compute great circle distance (useful in navigation). The straightforward formula with arccosine has poor accuracy when the angle is small (the most common case), due to the fact that cosine is flat at $0$. However the formula with haversine is more accurate. To achieve the same, you would have to use $sin^2(theta/2)$ everywhere, which require more computations (but it's still reasonable with logarithms). Therefore, navigation table like Nories's nautical tables have an haversine table.
Note that tables of logarithms are usually accurate up to 5 digits (some larger tables had 7 digits, some very special ones had better precision but were difficult to use : more digits = much more space on paper). Slide rules have roughly 3 digits of precision.
All of this is rendered pretty useless with calculators, which have usually around 15 digits of precision and compute fast enough that we don't have to worry about speeding things up with extra functions.
edited 15 hours ago
answered 15 hours ago
Jean-Claude ArbautJean-Claude Arbaut
15.1k63565
15.1k63565
4
$begingroup$
The log tables we used at school were four figure. I repeatedly got marked down (indirectly) for using five figure tables: I gave my answers to four figure precision, rather than the three I should have done if I were using four figure tables
$endgroup$
– JCRM
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JCRM I have never used tables at school, but the most common ones in France in the 60s-70s (Bouvart et Ratinet) were with 5 digits. This format dates back at least to the 19th century (Hoüel or Dupuis tables for instance). Tables with 4 digits would have been very small (2 pages), maybe for an exam where the teacher does not want to check for "additional" content in larger table (one of my tables has such hand written addition). I also have the 1948 IGN tables (8 digits), but they are much more painful (you need higher order interpolation).
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Oddly enough, I bought a log book 5 years back. I have no idea what my 11 year old self was thinking, but it was pretty cool.
$endgroup$
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MohammadZuhairKhan That's more or less my age when I stumble of my father's log table. Pretty cool indeed (though I remember I was surprised by exponent-mantissa notation which makes computation so easy with decimal logs). I think I have around twenty tables now. I can't really call this a collection, it's just that I am amazed when I find a new one, I can't resist :) Thinking of the incredible amount of work to compute with the table back then (let alone to compute the table), compared to what a computer can do know.
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Just re-opened the log table. 6 digits of accuracy for logs, anti-logs, trig functions, log of trig functions and so much more at 47 cents in the US. 61 pages including "some" formula and useful data.
$endgroup$
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
12 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
4
$begingroup$
The log tables we used at school were four figure. I repeatedly got marked down (indirectly) for using five figure tables: I gave my answers to four figure precision, rather than the three I should have done if I were using four figure tables
$endgroup$
– JCRM
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JCRM I have never used tables at school, but the most common ones in France in the 60s-70s (Bouvart et Ratinet) were with 5 digits. This format dates back at least to the 19th century (Hoüel or Dupuis tables for instance). Tables with 4 digits would have been very small (2 pages), maybe for an exam where the teacher does not want to check for "additional" content in larger table (one of my tables has such hand written addition). I also have the 1948 IGN tables (8 digits), but they are much more painful (you need higher order interpolation).
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Oddly enough, I bought a log book 5 years back. I have no idea what my 11 year old self was thinking, but it was pretty cool.
$endgroup$
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MohammadZuhairKhan That's more or less my age when I stumble of my father's log table. Pretty cool indeed (though I remember I was surprised by exponent-mantissa notation which makes computation so easy with decimal logs). I think I have around twenty tables now. I can't really call this a collection, it's just that I am amazed when I find a new one, I can't resist :) Thinking of the incredible amount of work to compute with the table back then (let alone to compute the table), compared to what a computer can do know.
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Just re-opened the log table. 6 digits of accuracy for logs, anti-logs, trig functions, log of trig functions and so much more at 47 cents in the US. 61 pages including "some" formula and useful data.
$endgroup$
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
12 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
The log tables we used at school were four figure. I repeatedly got marked down (indirectly) for using five figure tables: I gave my answers to four figure precision, rather than the three I should have done if I were using four figure tables
$endgroup$
– JCRM
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
The log tables we used at school were four figure. I repeatedly got marked down (indirectly) for using five figure tables: I gave my answers to four figure precision, rather than the three I should have done if I were using four figure tables
$endgroup$
– JCRM
14 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@JCRM I have never used tables at school, but the most common ones in France in the 60s-70s (Bouvart et Ratinet) were with 5 digits. This format dates back at least to the 19th century (Hoüel or Dupuis tables for instance). Tables with 4 digits would have been very small (2 pages), maybe for an exam where the teacher does not want to check for "additional" content in larger table (one of my tables has such hand written addition). I also have the 1948 IGN tables (8 digits), but they are much more painful (you need higher order interpolation).
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JCRM I have never used tables at school, but the most common ones in France in the 60s-70s (Bouvart et Ratinet) were with 5 digits. This format dates back at least to the 19th century (Hoüel or Dupuis tables for instance). Tables with 4 digits would have been very small (2 pages), maybe for an exam where the teacher does not want to check for "additional" content in larger table (one of my tables has such hand written addition). I also have the 1948 IGN tables (8 digits), but they are much more painful (you need higher order interpolation).
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
13 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Oddly enough, I bought a log book 5 years back. I have no idea what my 11 year old self was thinking, but it was pretty cool.
$endgroup$
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oddly enough, I bought a log book 5 years back. I have no idea what my 11 year old self was thinking, but it was pretty cool.
$endgroup$
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
12 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@MohammadZuhairKhan That's more or less my age when I stumble of my father's log table. Pretty cool indeed (though I remember I was surprised by exponent-mantissa notation which makes computation so easy with decimal logs). I think I have around twenty tables now. I can't really call this a collection, it's just that I am amazed when I find a new one, I can't resist :) Thinking of the incredible amount of work to compute with the table back then (let alone to compute the table), compared to what a computer can do know.
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MohammadZuhairKhan That's more or less my age when I stumble of my father's log table. Pretty cool indeed (though I remember I was surprised by exponent-mantissa notation which makes computation so easy with decimal logs). I think I have around twenty tables now. I can't really call this a collection, it's just that I am amazed when I find a new one, I can't resist :) Thinking of the incredible amount of work to compute with the table back then (let alone to compute the table), compared to what a computer can do know.
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
12 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Just re-opened the log table. 6 digits of accuracy for logs, anti-logs, trig functions, log of trig functions and so much more at 47 cents in the US. 61 pages including "some" formula and useful data.
$endgroup$
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Just re-opened the log table. 6 digits of accuracy for logs, anti-logs, trig functions, log of trig functions and so much more at 47 cents in the US. 61 pages including "some" formula and useful data.
$endgroup$
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
12 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3190922%2fwhy-are-the-trig-functions-versine-haversine-exsecant-etc-rarely-used-in-mod%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown