Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate...

If a contract sometimes uses the wrong name, is it still valid?

What is the meaning of the new sigil in Game of Thrones Season 8 intro?

Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours

Can a party unilaterally change candidates in preparation for a General election?

Do square wave exist?

Using et al. for a last / senior author rather than for a first author

Is it common practice to audition new musicians one-on-one before rehearsing with the entire band?

Dating a Former Employee

Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube

If my PI received research grants from a company to be able to pay my postdoc salary, did I have a potential conflict interest too?

Can anything be seen from the center of the Boötes void? How dark would it be?

What causes the direction of lightning flashes?

Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?

Why didn't Eitri join the fight?

An adverb for when you're not exaggerating

Irreducible of finite Krull dimension implies quasi-compact?

Most bit efficient text communication method?

Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

First console to have temporary backward compatibility

Extracting terms with certain heads in a function

Is it a good idea to use CNN to classify 1D signal?

Is it ethical to give a final exam after the professor has quit before teaching the remaining chapters of the course?

What are the out-of-universe reasons for the references to Toby Maguire-era Spider-Man in ITSV



Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Favourite questions and answers from the 1st quarter of 2019How could Jon Snow do what he did in “Oathbreaker”?Was this Cersei's plan?What was the significance of Varys' appearance in Dorne?What was Lenny's obsession with Airplane models?Frank Underwood's Obsession with PowerIs this montage in Game of Thrones (S07E03) imaginary?Do the Faceless Men take more than just a face?What are Cersei's intentions throughout this interaction?Why does Ramsay Snow engineer a sham escape?Did Daenerys know how to hatch the dragon eggs?












19















In Game of Thrones S08E01, Cersei was so disappointed for not getting elephants and it's being part of so many memes and joke now.



But why does elephant matter? Her competition/rivalry is with Daenerys/Starks etc. And they have dragons. So what purpose elephants can fulfill? What is the significance of this obsession?










share|improve this question




















  • 7





    Elephants can prove to be a valuable deterrent against charge of the Dothraki cavalry, provided Dragons do not interfere or are lured to deal with some other threat while Golden company with their elephants deals with the Dothraki. Horsemen and their horses can be terrified when they face elephants for first time. IRL Historically however, it doesn't work all that well. A determined mounted force can repel Elephants. See Alexander against Indian Elephants or Saad bin Abi Waqas against Persian Elephants.

    – Aegon
    15 hours ago






  • 4





    I took it as a joke and meant to highlight how out of touch Cersei is with the reality of the situation. The army of the dead marches on Westeros and she is concerned with the prestige of having elephants in her army. I laughed when she said "I really wanted those elephants..."

    – DKu
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    I wonder if the GoT budget this season wasn't big enough to include CGI and/or real elephants?

    – RobertF
    13 hours ago






  • 4





    @RobertF "What do dragons eat anyways?" ...... "CGI budget"....*Ghost whimpers sadly in the background*

    – Aegon
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    comment because unsubstantiated personal hypothesis: Cersei is jealous of Dany's dragons. She wanted the elephants so she could trot them out and say "look I can have intimidating war beasts too :P" as much to herself as to Dany.

    – Jared K
    10 hours ago
















19















In Game of Thrones S08E01, Cersei was so disappointed for not getting elephants and it's being part of so many memes and joke now.



But why does elephant matter? Her competition/rivalry is with Daenerys/Starks etc. And they have dragons. So what purpose elephants can fulfill? What is the significance of this obsession?










share|improve this question




















  • 7





    Elephants can prove to be a valuable deterrent against charge of the Dothraki cavalry, provided Dragons do not interfere or are lured to deal with some other threat while Golden company with their elephants deals with the Dothraki. Horsemen and their horses can be terrified when they face elephants for first time. IRL Historically however, it doesn't work all that well. A determined mounted force can repel Elephants. See Alexander against Indian Elephants or Saad bin Abi Waqas against Persian Elephants.

    – Aegon
    15 hours ago






  • 4





    I took it as a joke and meant to highlight how out of touch Cersei is with the reality of the situation. The army of the dead marches on Westeros and she is concerned with the prestige of having elephants in her army. I laughed when she said "I really wanted those elephants..."

    – DKu
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    I wonder if the GoT budget this season wasn't big enough to include CGI and/or real elephants?

    – RobertF
    13 hours ago






  • 4





    @RobertF "What do dragons eat anyways?" ...... "CGI budget"....*Ghost whimpers sadly in the background*

    – Aegon
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    comment because unsubstantiated personal hypothesis: Cersei is jealous of Dany's dragons. She wanted the elephants so she could trot them out and say "look I can have intimidating war beasts too :P" as much to herself as to Dany.

    – Jared K
    10 hours ago














19












19








19








In Game of Thrones S08E01, Cersei was so disappointed for not getting elephants and it's being part of so many memes and joke now.



But why does elephant matter? Her competition/rivalry is with Daenerys/Starks etc. And they have dragons. So what purpose elephants can fulfill? What is the significance of this obsession?










share|improve this question
















In Game of Thrones S08E01, Cersei was so disappointed for not getting elephants and it's being part of so many memes and joke now.



But why does elephant matter? Her competition/rivalry is with Daenerys/Starks etc. And they have dragons. So what purpose elephants can fulfill? What is the significance of this obsession?







character game-of-thrones






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 14 hours ago









Paulie_D

89.5k18318294




89.5k18318294










asked 15 hours ago









Ankit SharmaAnkit Sharma

77.2k63413628




77.2k63413628








  • 7





    Elephants can prove to be a valuable deterrent against charge of the Dothraki cavalry, provided Dragons do not interfere or are lured to deal with some other threat while Golden company with their elephants deals with the Dothraki. Horsemen and their horses can be terrified when they face elephants for first time. IRL Historically however, it doesn't work all that well. A determined mounted force can repel Elephants. See Alexander against Indian Elephants or Saad bin Abi Waqas against Persian Elephants.

    – Aegon
    15 hours ago






  • 4





    I took it as a joke and meant to highlight how out of touch Cersei is with the reality of the situation. The army of the dead marches on Westeros and she is concerned with the prestige of having elephants in her army. I laughed when she said "I really wanted those elephants..."

    – DKu
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    I wonder if the GoT budget this season wasn't big enough to include CGI and/or real elephants?

    – RobertF
    13 hours ago






  • 4





    @RobertF "What do dragons eat anyways?" ...... "CGI budget"....*Ghost whimpers sadly in the background*

    – Aegon
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    comment because unsubstantiated personal hypothesis: Cersei is jealous of Dany's dragons. She wanted the elephants so she could trot them out and say "look I can have intimidating war beasts too :P" as much to herself as to Dany.

    – Jared K
    10 hours ago














  • 7





    Elephants can prove to be a valuable deterrent against charge of the Dothraki cavalry, provided Dragons do not interfere or are lured to deal with some other threat while Golden company with their elephants deals with the Dothraki. Horsemen and their horses can be terrified when they face elephants for first time. IRL Historically however, it doesn't work all that well. A determined mounted force can repel Elephants. See Alexander against Indian Elephants or Saad bin Abi Waqas against Persian Elephants.

    – Aegon
    15 hours ago






  • 4





    I took it as a joke and meant to highlight how out of touch Cersei is with the reality of the situation. The army of the dead marches on Westeros and she is concerned with the prestige of having elephants in her army. I laughed when she said "I really wanted those elephants..."

    – DKu
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    I wonder if the GoT budget this season wasn't big enough to include CGI and/or real elephants?

    – RobertF
    13 hours ago






  • 4





    @RobertF "What do dragons eat anyways?" ...... "CGI budget"....*Ghost whimpers sadly in the background*

    – Aegon
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    comment because unsubstantiated personal hypothesis: Cersei is jealous of Dany's dragons. She wanted the elephants so she could trot them out and say "look I can have intimidating war beasts too :P" as much to herself as to Dany.

    – Jared K
    10 hours ago








7




7





Elephants can prove to be a valuable deterrent against charge of the Dothraki cavalry, provided Dragons do not interfere or are lured to deal with some other threat while Golden company with their elephants deals with the Dothraki. Horsemen and their horses can be terrified when they face elephants for first time. IRL Historically however, it doesn't work all that well. A determined mounted force can repel Elephants. See Alexander against Indian Elephants or Saad bin Abi Waqas against Persian Elephants.

– Aegon
15 hours ago





Elephants can prove to be a valuable deterrent against charge of the Dothraki cavalry, provided Dragons do not interfere or are lured to deal with some other threat while Golden company with their elephants deals with the Dothraki. Horsemen and their horses can be terrified when they face elephants for first time. IRL Historically however, it doesn't work all that well. A determined mounted force can repel Elephants. See Alexander against Indian Elephants or Saad bin Abi Waqas against Persian Elephants.

– Aegon
15 hours ago




4




4





I took it as a joke and meant to highlight how out of touch Cersei is with the reality of the situation. The army of the dead marches on Westeros and she is concerned with the prestige of having elephants in her army. I laughed when she said "I really wanted those elephants..."

– DKu
14 hours ago





I took it as a joke and meant to highlight how out of touch Cersei is with the reality of the situation. The army of the dead marches on Westeros and she is concerned with the prestige of having elephants in her army. I laughed when she said "I really wanted those elephants..."

– DKu
14 hours ago




1




1





I wonder if the GoT budget this season wasn't big enough to include CGI and/or real elephants?

– RobertF
13 hours ago





I wonder if the GoT budget this season wasn't big enough to include CGI and/or real elephants?

– RobertF
13 hours ago




4




4





@RobertF "What do dragons eat anyways?" ...... "CGI budget"....*Ghost whimpers sadly in the background*

– Aegon
12 hours ago





@RobertF "What do dragons eat anyways?" ...... "CGI budget"....*Ghost whimpers sadly in the background*

– Aegon
12 hours ago




1




1





comment because unsubstantiated personal hypothesis: Cersei is jealous of Dany's dragons. She wanted the elephants so she could trot them out and say "look I can have intimidating war beasts too :P" as much to herself as to Dany.

– Jared K
10 hours ago





comment because unsubstantiated personal hypothesis: Cersei is jealous of Dany's dragons. She wanted the elephants so she could trot them out and say "look I can have intimidating war beasts too :P" as much to herself as to Dany.

– Jared K
10 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















25














It seems they were a kind of Easter-Egg.



In the novels, we received a long narrative about the elephants of The Golden Company, which was left out of the show.




In George R. R. Martin’s fifth GOT novel, A Dance With Dragons, we learn of The Golden Company through a rather long-winded side story that has thankfully been cut from the HBO show lest it get even more complicated. Someone in the writer’s room clearly wasn’t happy with this decision, and so decided to throw in an elephant-sized easter egg for viewers who have also read the series so far.





Cersei’s need for elephants in the Game Of Thrones premiere comes directly from the books - Metro UK




So, it seems like this is a special Easter-Egg for those who have read the series.






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    I sooo wanted Aegon VI to come charging out on an Elephant. Surprise fellow-Valyrians!

    – Aegon
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    I'd assumed that they mentioned elephants at the end of Season 7 because the producers wanted to pressure HBO into providing enough budget for real elephants. "We need elephants, the fans expect it!". Cersei is expressing their disappointment.

    – user568458
    6 hours ago





















9














Elephants are always a funny kind of weapon



Having a big weapon on your side is a terrible advantage. Elephants are a good historical example: while they don't deal a lot of damage per se, they are terrible for enemy morale. You can only have a few, and each of them won't deal a lot of damage. But if you are on the other side, that's another topic.



Gosh, an elephant charging me! Ok, so if we all keep the formation, the elephant will crush on our spear formation. Sure, there will be casualties, but we will win. The only thing we had to do is keep our formation. Hey, what is Joe doing? he can't escape the battle, can he? Whatever, he was a coward. We can keep formation without him. But, wait, Jack is also fleeing! He was the best of us. If even he thinks we are lost... But we need to keep the formation! Oh, no, some others are also running. The formation just broke up, the odds are very bad for me. Yep, better run for my life.



Even if the elephant wouldn't do that much damage, it crushes the enemy formation, and you can now deal much more damage.



Why on earth wouldn't you want such a weapon?



Sure, the enemy also have a huge weapon, but that won't ensure that the foot soldiers will keep the formation.



And it's because she doesn't have dragons that she wants a similar, smaller armed animal that can afraid the enemy.



So that we don't expect elephants



Golden company is well-known for their elephants. Harry Strickland is proud of them, and as it's the final season, we expect massive battles. This scene is also a way for showrunners to tell the spectators to don't expect any elephant. Sorry, all CGI budget was burned on dragons.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    The won't deal a lot of damage part depends on the strategy and the elephants, the Oliphaunts in Lord of the rings did a lot of damage.

    – Gustavo Gabriel
    14 hours ago








  • 7





    The oliphaunts were three times the height of elephants & carried huge "battle scythes" like living combined-harvesters, because their outsized tusks could sweep the ground.

    – Tetsujin
    13 hours ago






  • 2





    Elephants were very easy to defeat because they have a strong self-preservation instinct; give elephants a way to escape the battle (by, say, causing your formation to have large, safe gaps) and they take it. Until the Romans figured that out, though, elephants were extremely difficult to deal with.

    – Michael W.
    13 hours ago






  • 3





    @Tetsujin The LOTR Oliphaunts weren't elephants; they were Ultralisks!

    – Mason Wheeler
    12 hours ago






  • 2





    Paper beats rock, rock beats scissors, flaming pigs beat elephants.

    – Jeff Lambert
    11 hours ago



















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









25














It seems they were a kind of Easter-Egg.



In the novels, we received a long narrative about the elephants of The Golden Company, which was left out of the show.




In George R. R. Martin’s fifth GOT novel, A Dance With Dragons, we learn of The Golden Company through a rather long-winded side story that has thankfully been cut from the HBO show lest it get even more complicated. Someone in the writer’s room clearly wasn’t happy with this decision, and so decided to throw in an elephant-sized easter egg for viewers who have also read the series so far.





Cersei’s need for elephants in the Game Of Thrones premiere comes directly from the books - Metro UK




So, it seems like this is a special Easter-Egg for those who have read the series.






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    I sooo wanted Aegon VI to come charging out on an Elephant. Surprise fellow-Valyrians!

    – Aegon
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    I'd assumed that they mentioned elephants at the end of Season 7 because the producers wanted to pressure HBO into providing enough budget for real elephants. "We need elephants, the fans expect it!". Cersei is expressing their disappointment.

    – user568458
    6 hours ago


















25














It seems they were a kind of Easter-Egg.



In the novels, we received a long narrative about the elephants of The Golden Company, which was left out of the show.




In George R. R. Martin’s fifth GOT novel, A Dance With Dragons, we learn of The Golden Company through a rather long-winded side story that has thankfully been cut from the HBO show lest it get even more complicated. Someone in the writer’s room clearly wasn’t happy with this decision, and so decided to throw in an elephant-sized easter egg for viewers who have also read the series so far.





Cersei’s need for elephants in the Game Of Thrones premiere comes directly from the books - Metro UK




So, it seems like this is a special Easter-Egg for those who have read the series.






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    I sooo wanted Aegon VI to come charging out on an Elephant. Surprise fellow-Valyrians!

    – Aegon
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    I'd assumed that they mentioned elephants at the end of Season 7 because the producers wanted to pressure HBO into providing enough budget for real elephants. "We need elephants, the fans expect it!". Cersei is expressing their disappointment.

    – user568458
    6 hours ago
















25












25








25







It seems they were a kind of Easter-Egg.



In the novels, we received a long narrative about the elephants of The Golden Company, which was left out of the show.




In George R. R. Martin’s fifth GOT novel, A Dance With Dragons, we learn of The Golden Company through a rather long-winded side story that has thankfully been cut from the HBO show lest it get even more complicated. Someone in the writer’s room clearly wasn’t happy with this decision, and so decided to throw in an elephant-sized easter egg for viewers who have also read the series so far.





Cersei’s need for elephants in the Game Of Thrones premiere comes directly from the books - Metro UK




So, it seems like this is a special Easter-Egg for those who have read the series.






share|improve this answer















It seems they were a kind of Easter-Egg.



In the novels, we received a long narrative about the elephants of The Golden Company, which was left out of the show.




In George R. R. Martin’s fifth GOT novel, A Dance With Dragons, we learn of The Golden Company through a rather long-winded side story that has thankfully been cut from the HBO show lest it get even more complicated. Someone in the writer’s room clearly wasn’t happy with this decision, and so decided to throw in an elephant-sized easter egg for viewers who have also read the series so far.





Cersei’s need for elephants in the Game Of Thrones premiere comes directly from the books - Metro UK




So, it seems like this is a special Easter-Egg for those who have read the series.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 14 hours ago

























answered 14 hours ago









NifflerNiffler

3,0062329




3,0062329








  • 3





    I sooo wanted Aegon VI to come charging out on an Elephant. Surprise fellow-Valyrians!

    – Aegon
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    I'd assumed that they mentioned elephants at the end of Season 7 because the producers wanted to pressure HBO into providing enough budget for real elephants. "We need elephants, the fans expect it!". Cersei is expressing their disappointment.

    – user568458
    6 hours ago
















  • 3





    I sooo wanted Aegon VI to come charging out on an Elephant. Surprise fellow-Valyrians!

    – Aegon
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    I'd assumed that they mentioned elephants at the end of Season 7 because the producers wanted to pressure HBO into providing enough budget for real elephants. "We need elephants, the fans expect it!". Cersei is expressing their disappointment.

    – user568458
    6 hours ago










3




3





I sooo wanted Aegon VI to come charging out on an Elephant. Surprise fellow-Valyrians!

– Aegon
14 hours ago





I sooo wanted Aegon VI to come charging out on an Elephant. Surprise fellow-Valyrians!

– Aegon
14 hours ago




1




1





I'd assumed that they mentioned elephants at the end of Season 7 because the producers wanted to pressure HBO into providing enough budget for real elephants. "We need elephants, the fans expect it!". Cersei is expressing their disappointment.

– user568458
6 hours ago







I'd assumed that they mentioned elephants at the end of Season 7 because the producers wanted to pressure HBO into providing enough budget for real elephants. "We need elephants, the fans expect it!". Cersei is expressing their disappointment.

– user568458
6 hours ago













9














Elephants are always a funny kind of weapon



Having a big weapon on your side is a terrible advantage. Elephants are a good historical example: while they don't deal a lot of damage per se, they are terrible for enemy morale. You can only have a few, and each of them won't deal a lot of damage. But if you are on the other side, that's another topic.



Gosh, an elephant charging me! Ok, so if we all keep the formation, the elephant will crush on our spear formation. Sure, there will be casualties, but we will win. The only thing we had to do is keep our formation. Hey, what is Joe doing? he can't escape the battle, can he? Whatever, he was a coward. We can keep formation without him. But, wait, Jack is also fleeing! He was the best of us. If even he thinks we are lost... But we need to keep the formation! Oh, no, some others are also running. The formation just broke up, the odds are very bad for me. Yep, better run for my life.



Even if the elephant wouldn't do that much damage, it crushes the enemy formation, and you can now deal much more damage.



Why on earth wouldn't you want such a weapon?



Sure, the enemy also have a huge weapon, but that won't ensure that the foot soldiers will keep the formation.



And it's because she doesn't have dragons that she wants a similar, smaller armed animal that can afraid the enemy.



So that we don't expect elephants



Golden company is well-known for their elephants. Harry Strickland is proud of them, and as it's the final season, we expect massive battles. This scene is also a way for showrunners to tell the spectators to don't expect any elephant. Sorry, all CGI budget was burned on dragons.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    The won't deal a lot of damage part depends on the strategy and the elephants, the Oliphaunts in Lord of the rings did a lot of damage.

    – Gustavo Gabriel
    14 hours ago








  • 7





    The oliphaunts were three times the height of elephants & carried huge "battle scythes" like living combined-harvesters, because their outsized tusks could sweep the ground.

    – Tetsujin
    13 hours ago






  • 2





    Elephants were very easy to defeat because they have a strong self-preservation instinct; give elephants a way to escape the battle (by, say, causing your formation to have large, safe gaps) and they take it. Until the Romans figured that out, though, elephants were extremely difficult to deal with.

    – Michael W.
    13 hours ago






  • 3





    @Tetsujin The LOTR Oliphaunts weren't elephants; they were Ultralisks!

    – Mason Wheeler
    12 hours ago






  • 2





    Paper beats rock, rock beats scissors, flaming pigs beat elephants.

    – Jeff Lambert
    11 hours ago
















9














Elephants are always a funny kind of weapon



Having a big weapon on your side is a terrible advantage. Elephants are a good historical example: while they don't deal a lot of damage per se, they are terrible for enemy morale. You can only have a few, and each of them won't deal a lot of damage. But if you are on the other side, that's another topic.



Gosh, an elephant charging me! Ok, so if we all keep the formation, the elephant will crush on our spear formation. Sure, there will be casualties, but we will win. The only thing we had to do is keep our formation. Hey, what is Joe doing? he can't escape the battle, can he? Whatever, he was a coward. We can keep formation without him. But, wait, Jack is also fleeing! He was the best of us. If even he thinks we are lost... But we need to keep the formation! Oh, no, some others are also running. The formation just broke up, the odds are very bad for me. Yep, better run for my life.



Even if the elephant wouldn't do that much damage, it crushes the enemy formation, and you can now deal much more damage.



Why on earth wouldn't you want such a weapon?



Sure, the enemy also have a huge weapon, but that won't ensure that the foot soldiers will keep the formation.



And it's because she doesn't have dragons that she wants a similar, smaller armed animal that can afraid the enemy.



So that we don't expect elephants



Golden company is well-known for their elephants. Harry Strickland is proud of them, and as it's the final season, we expect massive battles. This scene is also a way for showrunners to tell the spectators to don't expect any elephant. Sorry, all CGI budget was burned on dragons.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    The won't deal a lot of damage part depends on the strategy and the elephants, the Oliphaunts in Lord of the rings did a lot of damage.

    – Gustavo Gabriel
    14 hours ago








  • 7





    The oliphaunts were three times the height of elephants & carried huge "battle scythes" like living combined-harvesters, because their outsized tusks could sweep the ground.

    – Tetsujin
    13 hours ago






  • 2





    Elephants were very easy to defeat because they have a strong self-preservation instinct; give elephants a way to escape the battle (by, say, causing your formation to have large, safe gaps) and they take it. Until the Romans figured that out, though, elephants were extremely difficult to deal with.

    – Michael W.
    13 hours ago






  • 3





    @Tetsujin The LOTR Oliphaunts weren't elephants; they were Ultralisks!

    – Mason Wheeler
    12 hours ago






  • 2





    Paper beats rock, rock beats scissors, flaming pigs beat elephants.

    – Jeff Lambert
    11 hours ago














9












9








9







Elephants are always a funny kind of weapon



Having a big weapon on your side is a terrible advantage. Elephants are a good historical example: while they don't deal a lot of damage per se, they are terrible for enemy morale. You can only have a few, and each of them won't deal a lot of damage. But if you are on the other side, that's another topic.



Gosh, an elephant charging me! Ok, so if we all keep the formation, the elephant will crush on our spear formation. Sure, there will be casualties, but we will win. The only thing we had to do is keep our formation. Hey, what is Joe doing? he can't escape the battle, can he? Whatever, he was a coward. We can keep formation without him. But, wait, Jack is also fleeing! He was the best of us. If even he thinks we are lost... But we need to keep the formation! Oh, no, some others are also running. The formation just broke up, the odds are very bad for me. Yep, better run for my life.



Even if the elephant wouldn't do that much damage, it crushes the enemy formation, and you can now deal much more damage.



Why on earth wouldn't you want such a weapon?



Sure, the enemy also have a huge weapon, but that won't ensure that the foot soldiers will keep the formation.



And it's because she doesn't have dragons that she wants a similar, smaller armed animal that can afraid the enemy.



So that we don't expect elephants



Golden company is well-known for their elephants. Harry Strickland is proud of them, and as it's the final season, we expect massive battles. This scene is also a way for showrunners to tell the spectators to don't expect any elephant. Sorry, all CGI budget was burned on dragons.






share|improve this answer















Elephants are always a funny kind of weapon



Having a big weapon on your side is a terrible advantage. Elephants are a good historical example: while they don't deal a lot of damage per se, they are terrible for enemy morale. You can only have a few, and each of them won't deal a lot of damage. But if you are on the other side, that's another topic.



Gosh, an elephant charging me! Ok, so if we all keep the formation, the elephant will crush on our spear formation. Sure, there will be casualties, but we will win. The only thing we had to do is keep our formation. Hey, what is Joe doing? he can't escape the battle, can he? Whatever, he was a coward. We can keep formation without him. But, wait, Jack is also fleeing! He was the best of us. If even he thinks we are lost... But we need to keep the formation! Oh, no, some others are also running. The formation just broke up, the odds are very bad for me. Yep, better run for my life.



Even if the elephant wouldn't do that much damage, it crushes the enemy formation, and you can now deal much more damage.



Why on earth wouldn't you want such a weapon?



Sure, the enemy also have a huge weapon, but that won't ensure that the foot soldiers will keep the formation.



And it's because she doesn't have dragons that she wants a similar, smaller armed animal that can afraid the enemy.



So that we don't expect elephants



Golden company is well-known for their elephants. Harry Strickland is proud of them, and as it's the final season, we expect massive battles. This scene is also a way for showrunners to tell the spectators to don't expect any elephant. Sorry, all CGI budget was burned on dragons.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 17 mins ago









Community

1




1










answered 15 hours ago









KepotxKepotx

644410




644410








  • 1





    The won't deal a lot of damage part depends on the strategy and the elephants, the Oliphaunts in Lord of the rings did a lot of damage.

    – Gustavo Gabriel
    14 hours ago








  • 7





    The oliphaunts were three times the height of elephants & carried huge "battle scythes" like living combined-harvesters, because their outsized tusks could sweep the ground.

    – Tetsujin
    13 hours ago






  • 2





    Elephants were very easy to defeat because they have a strong self-preservation instinct; give elephants a way to escape the battle (by, say, causing your formation to have large, safe gaps) and they take it. Until the Romans figured that out, though, elephants were extremely difficult to deal with.

    – Michael W.
    13 hours ago






  • 3





    @Tetsujin The LOTR Oliphaunts weren't elephants; they were Ultralisks!

    – Mason Wheeler
    12 hours ago






  • 2





    Paper beats rock, rock beats scissors, flaming pigs beat elephants.

    – Jeff Lambert
    11 hours ago














  • 1





    The won't deal a lot of damage part depends on the strategy and the elephants, the Oliphaunts in Lord of the rings did a lot of damage.

    – Gustavo Gabriel
    14 hours ago








  • 7





    The oliphaunts were three times the height of elephants & carried huge "battle scythes" like living combined-harvesters, because their outsized tusks could sweep the ground.

    – Tetsujin
    13 hours ago






  • 2





    Elephants were very easy to defeat because they have a strong self-preservation instinct; give elephants a way to escape the battle (by, say, causing your formation to have large, safe gaps) and they take it. Until the Romans figured that out, though, elephants were extremely difficult to deal with.

    – Michael W.
    13 hours ago






  • 3





    @Tetsujin The LOTR Oliphaunts weren't elephants; they were Ultralisks!

    – Mason Wheeler
    12 hours ago






  • 2





    Paper beats rock, rock beats scissors, flaming pigs beat elephants.

    – Jeff Lambert
    11 hours ago








1




1





The won't deal a lot of damage part depends on the strategy and the elephants, the Oliphaunts in Lord of the rings did a lot of damage.

– Gustavo Gabriel
14 hours ago







The won't deal a lot of damage part depends on the strategy and the elephants, the Oliphaunts in Lord of the rings did a lot of damage.

– Gustavo Gabriel
14 hours ago






7




7





The oliphaunts were three times the height of elephants & carried huge "battle scythes" like living combined-harvesters, because their outsized tusks could sweep the ground.

– Tetsujin
13 hours ago





The oliphaunts were three times the height of elephants & carried huge "battle scythes" like living combined-harvesters, because their outsized tusks could sweep the ground.

– Tetsujin
13 hours ago




2




2





Elephants were very easy to defeat because they have a strong self-preservation instinct; give elephants a way to escape the battle (by, say, causing your formation to have large, safe gaps) and they take it. Until the Romans figured that out, though, elephants were extremely difficult to deal with.

– Michael W.
13 hours ago





Elephants were very easy to defeat because they have a strong self-preservation instinct; give elephants a way to escape the battle (by, say, causing your formation to have large, safe gaps) and they take it. Until the Romans figured that out, though, elephants were extremely difficult to deal with.

– Michael W.
13 hours ago




3




3





@Tetsujin The LOTR Oliphaunts weren't elephants; they were Ultralisks!

– Mason Wheeler
12 hours ago





@Tetsujin The LOTR Oliphaunts weren't elephants; they were Ultralisks!

– Mason Wheeler
12 hours ago




2




2





Paper beats rock, rock beats scissors, flaming pigs beat elephants.

– Jeff Lambert
11 hours ago





Paper beats rock, rock beats scissors, flaming pigs beat elephants.

– Jeff Lambert
11 hours ago



Popular posts from this blog

VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...

Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Mirandela Referências Menu de...

looking for continuous Screen Capture for retroactivly reproducing errors, timeback machineRolling desktop...