autoconf installation in solaris 9 The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWeb...
Is bread bad for ducks?
What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?
Can one be advised by a professor who is very far away?
What is the most effective way of iterating a std::vector and why?
Right tool to dig six foot holes?
How to manage monthly salary
Why can Shazam fly?
Loose spokes after only a few rides
What is the meaning of the verb "bear" in this context?
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?
Worn-tile Scrabble
If a Druid sees an animal’s corpse, can they wild shape into that animal?
How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure
Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?
Identify boardgame from Big movie
What did it mean to "align" a radio?
Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?
Why hard-Brexiteers don't insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?
What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?
Who coined the term "madman theory"?
"as much details as you can remember"
Do these rules for Critical Successes and Critical Failures seem Fair?
Did Section 31 appear in Star Trek: The Next Generation?
autoconf installation in solaris 9
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWeb platform installer fails to start installationAuthenticating Solaris box against Open DirectoryAutoconf, Libtool, and an undefined AC_PROG_LIBTOOLSolaris Automated install Hard-Drive Windows 7how to get git on solaris webspace?Solaris 11.1 x86 installing Weblogic 12.11ESXi 6.0 U1 + Solaris 11.0 VM = host CPU high (slowly climbing) but VM idleSolaris x86 downgrade NVIDIA driverUpdating autoconf on CentOSAnaconda 2018.12 Installation on Windows 10
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
bash-2.05$ ./autogen.sh
buildcheck: checking installation...
./build/buildcheck.sh: autoconf: not found
buildcheck: autoconf not found.
You need autoconf version 2.50 or newer installed.
Getting above error while running the script, seem autoconf is not installed, Please help me out with installation process for solaris 9.
installation solaris build autoconf
New contributor
HarshGiri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
bash-2.05$ ./autogen.sh
buildcheck: checking installation...
./build/buildcheck.sh: autoconf: not found
buildcheck: autoconf not found.
You need autoconf version 2.50 or newer installed.
Getting above error while running the script, seem autoconf is not installed, Please help me out with installation process for solaris 9.
installation solaris build autoconf
New contributor
HarshGiri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
bash-2.05$ ./autogen.sh
buildcheck: checking installation...
./build/buildcheck.sh: autoconf: not found
buildcheck: autoconf not found.
You need autoconf version 2.50 or newer installed.
Getting above error while running the script, seem autoconf is not installed, Please help me out with installation process for solaris 9.
installation solaris build autoconf
New contributor
HarshGiri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
bash-2.05$ ./autogen.sh
buildcheck: checking installation...
./build/buildcheck.sh: autoconf: not found
buildcheck: autoconf not found.
You need autoconf version 2.50 or newer installed.
Getting above error while running the script, seem autoconf is not installed, Please help me out with installation process for solaris 9.
installation solaris build autoconf
installation solaris build autoconf
New contributor
HarshGiri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
HarshGiri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
HarshGiri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
HarshGiriHarshGiri
101
101
New contributor
HarshGiri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
HarshGiri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
HarshGiri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Solaris 9 is a very old version, from 2002, and not well supported now that it's years past the end of its support life. You might find pre-built packages if you search sites like http://unixpackages.com/, but you might be stuck downloading the autoconf source from https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/ and building it yourself.
and building it yourself If it builds - Solaris 9 is waaay old, and Linux-targeted code such asautoconflikely won't build without significant modification. It's literally worse than asking current Windows code to compile on Windows 95.
– Andrew Henle
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
HarshGiri is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1423162%2fautoconf-installation-in-solaris-9%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Solaris 9 is a very old version, from 2002, and not well supported now that it's years past the end of its support life. You might find pre-built packages if you search sites like http://unixpackages.com/, but you might be stuck downloading the autoconf source from https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/ and building it yourself.
and building it yourself If it builds - Solaris 9 is waaay old, and Linux-targeted code such asautoconflikely won't build without significant modification. It's literally worse than asking current Windows code to compile on Windows 95.
– Andrew Henle
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Solaris 9 is a very old version, from 2002, and not well supported now that it's years past the end of its support life. You might find pre-built packages if you search sites like http://unixpackages.com/, but you might be stuck downloading the autoconf source from https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/ and building it yourself.
and building it yourself If it builds - Solaris 9 is waaay old, and Linux-targeted code such asautoconflikely won't build without significant modification. It's literally worse than asking current Windows code to compile on Windows 95.
– Andrew Henle
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Solaris 9 is a very old version, from 2002, and not well supported now that it's years past the end of its support life. You might find pre-built packages if you search sites like http://unixpackages.com/, but you might be stuck downloading the autoconf source from https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/ and building it yourself.
Solaris 9 is a very old version, from 2002, and not well supported now that it's years past the end of its support life. You might find pre-built packages if you search sites like http://unixpackages.com/, but you might be stuck downloading the autoconf source from https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/ and building it yourself.
answered yesterday
alancalanc
988511
988511
and building it yourself If it builds - Solaris 9 is waaay old, and Linux-targeted code such asautoconflikely won't build without significant modification. It's literally worse than asking current Windows code to compile on Windows 95.
– Andrew Henle
8 hours ago
add a comment |
and building it yourself If it builds - Solaris 9 is waaay old, and Linux-targeted code such asautoconflikely won't build without significant modification. It's literally worse than asking current Windows code to compile on Windows 95.
– Andrew Henle
8 hours ago
and building it yourself If it builds - Solaris 9 is waaay old, and Linux-targeted code such as
autoconf likely won't build without significant modification. It's literally worse than asking current Windows code to compile on Windows 95.– Andrew Henle
8 hours ago
and building it yourself If it builds - Solaris 9 is waaay old, and Linux-targeted code such as
autoconf likely won't build without significant modification. It's literally worse than asking current Windows code to compile on Windows 95.– Andrew Henle
8 hours ago
add a comment |
HarshGiri is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
HarshGiri is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
HarshGiri is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
HarshGiri is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1423162%2fautoconf-installation-in-solaris-9%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown