Supports in 3d printing The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow deep is the...
Is bread bad for ducks?
What do the Banks children have against barley water?
Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible?
Can a flute soloist sit?
How to deal with fear of taking dependencies
Shouldn't "much" here be used instead of "more"?
Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?
Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"
If a Druid sees an animal’s corpse, can they Wild Shape into that animal?
Worn-tile Scrabble
Can one be advised by a professor who is very far away?
Who coined the term "madman theory"?
What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?
What is the closest word meaning "respect for time / mindful"
Why hard-Brexiteers don't insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?
"as much details as you can remember"
Am I thawing this London Broil safely?
Right tool to dig six foot holes?
Why did Acorn's A3000 have red function keys?
Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?
Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?
FPGA - DIY Programming
Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?
Is a "Democratic" Oligarchy-Style System Possible?
Supports in 3d printing
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow deep is the force well of L4 and L5 Lagrangian Points of Earth-Sun set?Does living in space affect humans' strength?How did the Apollo astronauts train for the 1/6G lunar landing?Objects speeding up due to planets gravity?Is it possible for a human to walk on an asteroid?Would human “superpowers” in low gravity fade away through reduced muscle mass?How can astronauts float in space without being affected by the gravitational force of nearby objects?Is there really no difference between up and down in ISS?Gravitational assists from bodies other than planetsGravitational forces affecting acceleration on a space ship with artificial gravity
$begingroup$
Do astronauts print 3D in space with supports? They are needed only because of gravity, which - on a space station - obviously is not a problem.
gravity
asked yesterday
SpookSpook
1463
New contributor
Spook is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do astronauts print 3D in space with supports? They are needed only because of gravity, which - on a space station - obviously is not a problem.
gravity
asked yesterday
SpookSpook
1463
New contributor
Spook is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
People use "in space" to mean several different things. In this case, by "in space", I assume you mean "in free-fall", as opposed to "in a vacuum", or "unshielded from solar radiation", or "not on Earth", or ... .
$endgroup$
– Ray Butterworth
yesterday
$begingroup$
One of the more interesting aspects to consider would be the cooling of thermally deposited prints (FDM, etc). The general lack of convection may actually make things better, but will probably require some changes in strategy particularly fan algorithms.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do astronauts print 3D in space with supports? They are needed only because of gravity, which - on a space station - obviously is not a problem.
gravity
asked yesterday
SpookSpook
1463
New contributor
Spook is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Do astronauts print 3D in space with supports? They are needed only because of gravity, which - on a space station - obviously is not a problem.
gravity
gravity
asked yesterday
SpookSpook
1463
New contributor
Spook is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
SpookSpook
1463
New contributor
Spook is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
SpookSpook
1463
New contributor
Spook is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
SpookSpook
1463
asked yesterday
SpookSpook
1463
1463
New contributor
Spook is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Spook is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Spook is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
$begingroup$
People use "in space" to mean several different things. In this case, by "in space", I assume you mean "in free-fall", as opposed to "in a vacuum", or "unshielded from solar radiation", or "not on Earth", or ... .
$endgroup$
– Ray Butterworth
yesterday
$begingroup$
One of the more interesting aspects to consider would be the cooling of thermally deposited prints (FDM, etc). The general lack of convection may actually make things better, but will probably require some changes in strategy particularly fan algorithms.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
yesterday
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
People use "in space" to mean several different things. In this case, by "in space", I assume you mean "in free-fall", as opposed to "in a vacuum", or "unshielded from solar radiation", or "not on Earth", or ... .
$endgroup$
– Ray Butterworth
yesterday
$begingroup$
One of the more interesting aspects to consider would be the cooling of thermally deposited prints (FDM, etc). The general lack of convection may actually make things better, but will probably require some changes in strategy particularly fan algorithms.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
People use "in space" to mean several different things. In this case, by "in space", I assume you mean "in free-fall", as opposed to "in a vacuum", or "unshielded from solar radiation", or "not on Earth", or ... .
$endgroup$
– Ray Butterworth
yesterday
$begingroup$
People use "in space" to mean several different things. In this case, by "in space", I assume you mean "in free-fall", as opposed to "in a vacuum", or "unshielded from solar radiation", or "not on Earth", or ... .
$endgroup$
– Ray Butterworth
yesterday
$begingroup$
One of the more interesting aspects to consider would be the cooling of thermally deposited prints (FDM, etc). The general lack of convection may actually make things better, but will probably require some changes in strategy particularly fan algorithms.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
yesterday
$begingroup$
One of the more interesting aspects to consider would be the cooling of thermally deposited prints (FDM, etc). The general lack of convection may actually make things better, but will probably require some changes in strategy particularly fan algorithms.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Supports are not needed "just" because of gravity. They hold pieces in exact position relative to the "bed" (and so relative to the coordinate system).
With most printers the model moves during print in at least one position, whether Y or Z, and if you just suspended some pieces in midair when they are not connected to the main body during print, they would just stay in space relative to the printer main body/station, so they would effectively move against the rest of the print and ruin your day.
On the other hand "suspending" layers without any support would probably not be possible anyway, because they would stick to your nozzle (for FDM, but imho most other technologies have some similar problem).
answered yesterday
jkavalikjkavalik
3,81711338
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think this is true for supports generated for supporting elements because the connection to the main body is above the lowest point of the element, meaning that it would be floating in mid air as you say, but it probably would eliminate the need to support large overhangs.
$endgroup$
– James Trotter
yesterday
$begingroup$
"if you just suspended some pieces in midair when they are not connected to the main body during print, they would just stay in space relative to the printer main body/station" I suspect you'd find the extruded material would be pulled along after the nozzle. Viscosity effects overcome gravity here on Earth; material extruded in mid-air sometimes falls to the bed, but often just bundles up on the nozzle. In space I'd expect it to do so even more readily. Supports are there to give something other than the nozzle for the material to stick to as much as they are to actually hold it up.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
yesterday
$begingroup$
@anaximander I hoped I covered that with the last sentence but maybe it is not understandable?
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
yesterday
$begingroup$
@JamesTrotter yes, the support requirements will be different, but imho not that much. Bridges do not need supporting even now, with zero-g they would just not sag at all. Overhangs can even on Earth actually curl up and supports are sometimes needed to keep them down in my experience.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
yesterday
$begingroup$
I feel like if you went slow enough with sufficient cooling, you could do a 90 degree bend on an overhang in space which would have a significantly higher change of failure under earths gravity... but thats a very specific problem.
$endgroup$
– James Trotter
21 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have no links to validate this answer, but with a few years of 3D printing behind me, I can attest to the effect of gravity on 3D printing.
Micro-gravity would be a boon for earth-bound 3D printing enthusiasts. There would be no droop to the filament when bridging (spanning open areas) and no fallen models without support. The construction of each layer would be dependent on the bond to the previous layer which is how it's done on the planet, but there would be no outside force (is gravity an outside force?) causing the new layer to fall. There would be no fall, so to speak, because the entire model being printed is falling around the earth at the same rate.
There are 3D printers described as five-axis printers which rotate the model in three-space to direct the filament "downward" respective to the desired placement, but it's not really artificial gravity.
Zero-G would enable some creativity that is unavailable to mere mortals. Loops of filament could be extruded without sag, allowing for intricate latticework and rather stunning artistic creation.
answered yesterday
fred_dot_ufred_dot_u
642128
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This doesn't seem to be an answer @fred_dot_u.
$endgroup$
– GdD
yesterday
$begingroup$
I can't help but wonder though, in the case of FDM printing, would it actually work as well as you're suggesting, or would the adherence of the filament to the nozzle cause the moving nozzle to impart momentum to the filament, making it move in other (unwanted) directions?
$endgroup$
– Doktor J
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Upvoted for the bridging realization - performance there would indeed drastically improve. However, curves and verticies in free space will not work any more than they would in a terrestrial case where bed adhesion is lacking.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Spook is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35398%2fsupports-in-3d-printing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Supports are not needed "just" because of gravity. They hold pieces in exact position relative to the "bed" (and so relative to the coordinate system).
With most printers the model moves during print in at least one position, whether Y or Z, and if you just suspended some pieces in midair when they are not connected to the main body during print, they would just stay in space relative to the printer main body/station, so they would effectively move against the rest of the print and ruin your day.
On the other hand "suspending" layers without any support would probably not be possible anyway, because they would stick to your nozzle (for FDM, but imho most other technologies have some similar problem).
answered yesterday
jkavalikjkavalik
3,81711338
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think this is true for supports generated for supporting elements because the connection to the main body is above the lowest point of the element, meaning that it would be floating in mid air as you say, but it probably would eliminate the need to support large overhangs.
$endgroup$
– James Trotter
yesterday
$begingroup$
"if you just suspended some pieces in midair when they are not connected to the main body during print, they would just stay in space relative to the printer main body/station" I suspect you'd find the extruded material would be pulled along after the nozzle. Viscosity effects overcome gravity here on Earth; material extruded in mid-air sometimes falls to the bed, but often just bundles up on the nozzle. In space I'd expect it to do so even more readily. Supports are there to give something other than the nozzle for the material to stick to as much as they are to actually hold it up.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
yesterday
$begingroup$
@anaximander I hoped I covered that with the last sentence but maybe it is not understandable?
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
yesterday
$begingroup$
@JamesTrotter yes, the support requirements will be different, but imho not that much. Bridges do not need supporting even now, with zero-g they would just not sag at all. Overhangs can even on Earth actually curl up and supports are sometimes needed to keep them down in my experience.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
yesterday
$begingroup$
I feel like if you went slow enough with sufficient cooling, you could do a 90 degree bend on an overhang in space which would have a significantly higher change of failure under earths gravity... but thats a very specific problem.
$endgroup$
– James Trotter
21 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Supports are not needed "just" because of gravity. They hold pieces in exact position relative to the "bed" (and so relative to the coordinate system).
With most printers the model moves during print in at least one position, whether Y or Z, and if you just suspended some pieces in midair when they are not connected to the main body during print, they would just stay in space relative to the printer main body/station, so they would effectively move against the rest of the print and ruin your day.
On the other hand "suspending" layers without any support would probably not be possible anyway, because they would stick to your nozzle (for FDM, but imho most other technologies have some similar problem).
answered yesterday
jkavalikjkavalik
3,81711338
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think this is true for supports generated for supporting elements because the connection to the main body is above the lowest point of the element, meaning that it would be floating in mid air as you say, but it probably would eliminate the need to support large overhangs.
$endgroup$
– James Trotter
yesterday
$begingroup$
"if you just suspended some pieces in midair when they are not connected to the main body during print, they would just stay in space relative to the printer main body/station" I suspect you'd find the extruded material would be pulled along after the nozzle. Viscosity effects overcome gravity here on Earth; material extruded in mid-air sometimes falls to the bed, but often just bundles up on the nozzle. In space I'd expect it to do so even more readily. Supports are there to give something other than the nozzle for the material to stick to as much as they are to actually hold it up.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
yesterday
$begingroup$
@anaximander I hoped I covered that with the last sentence but maybe it is not understandable?
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
yesterday
$begingroup$
@JamesTrotter yes, the support requirements will be different, but imho not that much. Bridges do not need supporting even now, with zero-g they would just not sag at all. Overhangs can even on Earth actually curl up and supports are sometimes needed to keep them down in my experience.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
yesterday
$begingroup$
I feel like if you went slow enough with sufficient cooling, you could do a 90 degree bend on an overhang in space which would have a significantly higher change of failure under earths gravity... but thats a very specific problem.
$endgroup$
– James Trotter
21 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Supports are not needed "just" because of gravity. They hold pieces in exact position relative to the "bed" (and so relative to the coordinate system).
With most printers the model moves during print in at least one position, whether Y or Z, and if you just suspended some pieces in midair when they are not connected to the main body during print, they would just stay in space relative to the printer main body/station, so they would effectively move against the rest of the print and ruin your day.
On the other hand "suspending" layers without any support would probably not be possible anyway, because they would stick to your nozzle (for FDM, but imho most other technologies have some similar problem).
answered yesterday
jkavalikjkavalik
3,81711338
$endgroup$
Supports are not needed "just" because of gravity. They hold pieces in exact position relative to the "bed" (and so relative to the coordinate system).
With most printers the model moves during print in at least one position, whether Y or Z, and if you just suspended some pieces in midair when they are not connected to the main body during print, they would just stay in space relative to the printer main body/station, so they would effectively move against the rest of the print and ruin your day.
On the other hand "suspending" layers without any support would probably not be possible anyway, because they would stick to your nozzle (for FDM, but imho most other technologies have some similar problem).
answered yesterday
jkavalikjkavalik
3,81711338
answered yesterday
jkavalikjkavalik
3,81711338
answered yesterday
jkavalikjkavalik
3,81711338
answered yesterday
jkavalikjkavalik
3,81711338
3,81711338
$begingroup$
I think this is true for supports generated for supporting elements because the connection to the main body is above the lowest point of the element, meaning that it would be floating in mid air as you say, but it probably would eliminate the need to support large overhangs.
$endgroup$
– James Trotter
yesterday
$begingroup$
"if you just suspended some pieces in midair when they are not connected to the main body during print, they would just stay in space relative to the printer main body/station" I suspect you'd find the extruded material would be pulled along after the nozzle. Viscosity effects overcome gravity here on Earth; material extruded in mid-air sometimes falls to the bed, but often just bundles up on the nozzle. In space I'd expect it to do so even more readily. Supports are there to give something other than the nozzle for the material to stick to as much as they are to actually hold it up.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
yesterday
$begingroup$
@anaximander I hoped I covered that with the last sentence but maybe it is not understandable?
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
yesterday
$begingroup$
@JamesTrotter yes, the support requirements will be different, but imho not that much. Bridges do not need supporting even now, with zero-g they would just not sag at all. Overhangs can even on Earth actually curl up and supports are sometimes needed to keep them down in my experience.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
yesterday
$begingroup$
I feel like if you went slow enough with sufficient cooling, you could do a 90 degree bend on an overhang in space which would have a significantly higher change of failure under earths gravity... but thats a very specific problem.
$endgroup$
– James Trotter
21 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think this is true for supports generated for supporting elements because the connection to the main body is above the lowest point of the element, meaning that it would be floating in mid air as you say, but it probably would eliminate the need to support large overhangs.
$endgroup$
– James Trotter
yesterday
$begingroup$
"if you just suspended some pieces in midair when they are not connected to the main body during print, they would just stay in space relative to the printer main body/station" I suspect you'd find the extruded material would be pulled along after the nozzle. Viscosity effects overcome gravity here on Earth; material extruded in mid-air sometimes falls to the bed, but often just bundles up on the nozzle. In space I'd expect it to do so even more readily. Supports are there to give something other than the nozzle for the material to stick to as much as they are to actually hold it up.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
yesterday
$begingroup$
@anaximander I hoped I covered that with the last sentence but maybe it is not understandable?
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
yesterday
$begingroup$
@JamesTrotter yes, the support requirements will be different, but imho not that much. Bridges do not need supporting even now, with zero-g they would just not sag at all. Overhangs can even on Earth actually curl up and supports are sometimes needed to keep them down in my experience.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
yesterday
$begingroup$
I feel like if you went slow enough with sufficient cooling, you could do a 90 degree bend on an overhang in space which would have a significantly higher change of failure under earths gravity... but thats a very specific problem.
$endgroup$
– James Trotter
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think this is true for supports generated for supporting elements because the connection to the main body is above the lowest point of the element, meaning that it would be floating in mid air as you say, but it probably would eliminate the need to support large overhangs.
$endgroup$
– James Trotter
yesterday
$begingroup$
I think this is true for supports generated for supporting elements because the connection to the main body is above the lowest point of the element, meaning that it would be floating in mid air as you say, but it probably would eliminate the need to support large overhangs.
$endgroup$
– James Trotter
yesterday
$begingroup$
"if you just suspended some pieces in midair when they are not connected to the main body during print, they would just stay in space relative to the printer main body/station" I suspect you'd find the extruded material would be pulled along after the nozzle. Viscosity effects overcome gravity here on Earth; material extruded in mid-air sometimes falls to the bed, but often just bundles up on the nozzle. In space I'd expect it to do so even more readily. Supports are there to give something other than the nozzle for the material to stick to as much as they are to actually hold it up.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
yesterday
$begingroup$
"if you just suspended some pieces in midair when they are not connected to the main body during print, they would just stay in space relative to the printer main body/station" I suspect you'd find the extruded material would be pulled along after the nozzle. Viscosity effects overcome gravity here on Earth; material extruded in mid-air sometimes falls to the bed, but often just bundles up on the nozzle. In space I'd expect it to do so even more readily. Supports are there to give something other than the nozzle for the material to stick to as much as they are to actually hold it up.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
yesterday
$begingroup$
@anaximander I hoped I covered that with the last sentence but maybe it is not understandable?
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
yesterday
$begingroup$
@anaximander I hoped I covered that with the last sentence but maybe it is not understandable?
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
yesterday
$begingroup$
@JamesTrotter yes, the support requirements will be different, but imho not that much. Bridges do not need supporting even now, with zero-g they would just not sag at all. Overhangs can even on Earth actually curl up and supports are sometimes needed to keep them down in my experience.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
yesterday
$begingroup$
@JamesTrotter yes, the support requirements will be different, but imho not that much. Bridges do not need supporting even now, with zero-g they would just not sag at all. Overhangs can even on Earth actually curl up and supports are sometimes needed to keep them down in my experience.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
yesterday
$begingroup$
I feel like if you went slow enough with sufficient cooling, you could do a 90 degree bend on an overhang in space which would have a significantly higher change of failure under earths gravity... but thats a very specific problem.
$endgroup$
– James Trotter
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
I feel like if you went slow enough with sufficient cooling, you could do a 90 degree bend on an overhang in space which would have a significantly higher change of failure under earths gravity... but thats a very specific problem.
$endgroup$
– James Trotter
21 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have no links to validate this answer, but with a few years of 3D printing behind me, I can attest to the effect of gravity on 3D printing.
Micro-gravity would be a boon for earth-bound 3D printing enthusiasts. There would be no droop to the filament when bridging (spanning open areas) and no fallen models without support. The construction of each layer would be dependent on the bond to the previous layer which is how it's done on the planet, but there would be no outside force (is gravity an outside force?) causing the new layer to fall. There would be no fall, so to speak, because the entire model being printed is falling around the earth at the same rate.
There are 3D printers described as five-axis printers which rotate the model in three-space to direct the filament "downward" respective to the desired placement, but it's not really artificial gravity.
Zero-G would enable some creativity that is unavailable to mere mortals. Loops of filament could be extruded without sag, allowing for intricate latticework and rather stunning artistic creation.
answered yesterday
fred_dot_ufred_dot_u
642128
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This doesn't seem to be an answer @fred_dot_u.
$endgroup$
– GdD
yesterday
$begingroup$
I can't help but wonder though, in the case of FDM printing, would it actually work as well as you're suggesting, or would the adherence of the filament to the nozzle cause the moving nozzle to impart momentum to the filament, making it move in other (unwanted) directions?
$endgroup$
– Doktor J
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Upvoted for the bridging realization - performance there would indeed drastically improve. However, curves and verticies in free space will not work any more than they would in a terrestrial case where bed adhesion is lacking.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have no links to validate this answer, but with a few years of 3D printing behind me, I can attest to the effect of gravity on 3D printing.
Micro-gravity would be a boon for earth-bound 3D printing enthusiasts. There would be no droop to the filament when bridging (spanning open areas) and no fallen models without support. The construction of each layer would be dependent on the bond to the previous layer which is how it's done on the planet, but there would be no outside force (is gravity an outside force?) causing the new layer to fall. There would be no fall, so to speak, because the entire model being printed is falling around the earth at the same rate.
There are 3D printers described as five-axis printers which rotate the model in three-space to direct the filament "downward" respective to the desired placement, but it's not really artificial gravity.
Zero-G would enable some creativity that is unavailable to mere mortals. Loops of filament could be extruded without sag, allowing for intricate latticework and rather stunning artistic creation.
answered yesterday
fred_dot_ufred_dot_u
642128
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This doesn't seem to be an answer @fred_dot_u.
$endgroup$
– GdD
yesterday
$begingroup$
I can't help but wonder though, in the case of FDM printing, would it actually work as well as you're suggesting, or would the adherence of the filament to the nozzle cause the moving nozzle to impart momentum to the filament, making it move in other (unwanted) directions?
$endgroup$
– Doktor J
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Upvoted for the bridging realization - performance there would indeed drastically improve. However, curves and verticies in free space will not work any more than they would in a terrestrial case where bed adhesion is lacking.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have no links to validate this answer, but with a few years of 3D printing behind me, I can attest to the effect of gravity on 3D printing.
Micro-gravity would be a boon for earth-bound 3D printing enthusiasts. There would be no droop to the filament when bridging (spanning open areas) and no fallen models without support. The construction of each layer would be dependent on the bond to the previous layer which is how it's done on the planet, but there would be no outside force (is gravity an outside force?) causing the new layer to fall. There would be no fall, so to speak, because the entire model being printed is falling around the earth at the same rate.
There are 3D printers described as five-axis printers which rotate the model in three-space to direct the filament "downward" respective to the desired placement, but it's not really artificial gravity.
Zero-G would enable some creativity that is unavailable to mere mortals. Loops of filament could be extruded without sag, allowing for intricate latticework and rather stunning artistic creation.
answered yesterday
fred_dot_ufred_dot_u
642128
$endgroup$
I have no links to validate this answer, but with a few years of 3D printing behind me, I can attest to the effect of gravity on 3D printing.
Micro-gravity would be a boon for earth-bound 3D printing enthusiasts. There would be no droop to the filament when bridging (spanning open areas) and no fallen models without support. The construction of each layer would be dependent on the bond to the previous layer which is how it's done on the planet, but there would be no outside force (is gravity an outside force?) causing the new layer to fall. There would be no fall, so to speak, because the entire model being printed is falling around the earth at the same rate.
There are 3D printers described as five-axis printers which rotate the model in three-space to direct the filament "downward" respective to the desired placement, but it's not really artificial gravity.
Zero-G would enable some creativity that is unavailable to mere mortals. Loops of filament could be extruded without sag, allowing for intricate latticework and rather stunning artistic creation.
answered yesterday
fred_dot_ufred_dot_u
642128
answered yesterday
fred_dot_ufred_dot_u
642128
answered yesterday
fred_dot_ufred_dot_u
642128
answered yesterday
fred_dot_ufred_dot_u
642128
642128
2
$begingroup$
This doesn't seem to be an answer @fred_dot_u.
$endgroup$
– GdD
yesterday
$begingroup$
I can't help but wonder though, in the case of FDM printing, would it actually work as well as you're suggesting, or would the adherence of the filament to the nozzle cause the moving nozzle to impart momentum to the filament, making it move in other (unwanted) directions?
$endgroup$
– Doktor J
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Upvoted for the bridging realization - performance there would indeed drastically improve. However, curves and verticies in free space will not work any more than they would in a terrestrial case where bed adhesion is lacking.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
yesterday
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
This doesn't seem to be an answer @fred_dot_u.
$endgroup$
– GdD
yesterday
$begingroup$
I can't help but wonder though, in the case of FDM printing, would it actually work as well as you're suggesting, or would the adherence of the filament to the nozzle cause the moving nozzle to impart momentum to the filament, making it move in other (unwanted) directions?
$endgroup$
– Doktor J
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Upvoted for the bridging realization - performance there would indeed drastically improve. However, curves and verticies in free space will not work any more than they would in a terrestrial case where bed adhesion is lacking.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
This doesn't seem to be an answer @fred_dot_u.
$endgroup$
– GdD
yesterday
$begingroup$
This doesn't seem to be an answer @fred_dot_u.
$endgroup$
– GdD
yesterday
$begingroup$
I can't help but wonder though, in the case of FDM printing, would it actually work as well as you're suggesting, or would the adherence of the filament to the nozzle cause the moving nozzle to impart momentum to the filament, making it move in other (unwanted) directions?
$endgroup$
– Doktor J
yesterday
$begingroup$
I can't help but wonder though, in the case of FDM printing, would it actually work as well as you're suggesting, or would the adherence of the filament to the nozzle cause the moving nozzle to impart momentum to the filament, making it move in other (unwanted) directions?
$endgroup$
– Doktor J
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
Upvoted for the bridging realization - performance there would indeed drastically improve. However, curves and verticies in free space will not work any more than they would in a terrestrial case where bed adhesion is lacking.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
yesterday
$begingroup$
Upvoted for the bridging realization - performance there would indeed drastically improve. However, curves and verticies in free space will not work any more than they would in a terrestrial case where bed adhesion is lacking.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
yesterday
add a comment |
Spook is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Spook is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Spook is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Spook is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35398%2fsupports-in-3d-printing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
People use "in space" to mean several different things. In this case, by "in space", I assume you mean "in free-fall", as opposed to "in a vacuum", or "unshielded from solar radiation", or "not on Earth", or ... .
$endgroup$
– Ray Butterworth
yesterday
$begingroup$
One of the more interesting aspects to consider would be the cooling of thermally deposited prints (FDM, etc). The general lack of convection may actually make things better, but will probably require some changes in strategy particularly fan algorithms.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
yesterday