Windows 10 Password Error with Samba Share The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results...
Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?
What is the closest word meaning "respect for time / mindful"
How technical should a Scrum Master be to effectively remove impediments?
Is this app Icon Browser Safe/Legit?
Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible?
Who coined the term "madman theory"?
Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?
How come people say “Would of”?
How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure
Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
Where to refill my bottle in India?
Protecting Dualbooting Windows from dangerous code (like rm -rf)
What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?
Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?
If a Druid sees an animal’s corpse, can they Wild Shape into that animal?
The difference between dialogue marks
What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?
slides for 30min~1hr skype tenure track application interview
Why hard-Brexiteers don't insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?
Reference request: Oldest number theory books with (unsolved) exercises?
Why can Shazam fly?
What did it mean to "align" a radio?
How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?
Windows 10 Password Error with Samba Share
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InUnable to access samba shared folder on Windows 7how to add a SMB (samba) password for a user in Debian, when there is no smbpasswd binary?Samba upgrade from 3.0 to 3.6 broke my ADS authenticationSamba share not accessible from Win 7 - tried advice on superuserCannot Mount Windows 7 Share from Linux using CIFS: Mount error(13): Permission deniedConnecting to Samba shares from a Windows 7 SP1 machineSamba 3.6.6 always creates as guestFor password protected Samba share on home network, ntlm vs ntlmv2 vs krb5 (kerberos)?How to allow guest access in SAMBASamba share for entire HDD with minimum securityCan't connect to Samba file share, user/password null in Samba logs?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I am trying to connect to a samba share with Windows 10 Pro (Version 1511, Build 10586.589) using the command net use L: \myservermyshare /u:myuser mypassword
. I get the error:
System error 86 - The specified network password is not correct.
I get the same result when using the Map network drive dialog.
Other clients (Android, Linux) can connect just fine with the same user/password.
I have tried adjusting the following security policies via secpol.msc:
- Microsoft network client: Send unencrypted password to third-party
SMB servers (enabled and disabled) - Netword security: LAN Manager authentication level (Send LM & NTLM responses, Send LM & NTLM - use NTLMv2 session security if negotiated
- Network security: Minimum session security for NTLM SSP based
clients/servers (128-bit encryption and none)
I am running samba 4.5.0-2 on Arch Linux (4.7.4-1). Server-side, I have reset the user password, removed and re-added the user to the smbpasswd backend, and started and restarted the smbservice.
My smbconf is basically the default:
[global]
workgroup = MYGROUP
server string = Samba Server
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 50
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
unix password sync = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %nn *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %nn *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
dns proxy = no
[my share]
comment = my share
browseable = yes
writable = yes
guest ok = no
path = /pathto/myshare
public = no
valid users = myuser
create mask = 770
I don't see anything out of the ordinary in testparm, and I have confirmed via pdbedit that my user is definitely registered with the backend.
It has worked fine before today and I do not know why it suddenly stopped working. Any advice is greatly appreciated.
linux networking windows-10 encryption samba
add a comment |
I am trying to connect to a samba share with Windows 10 Pro (Version 1511, Build 10586.589) using the command net use L: \myservermyshare /u:myuser mypassword
. I get the error:
System error 86 - The specified network password is not correct.
I get the same result when using the Map network drive dialog.
Other clients (Android, Linux) can connect just fine with the same user/password.
I have tried adjusting the following security policies via secpol.msc:
- Microsoft network client: Send unencrypted password to third-party
SMB servers (enabled and disabled) - Netword security: LAN Manager authentication level (Send LM & NTLM responses, Send LM & NTLM - use NTLMv2 session security if negotiated
- Network security: Minimum session security for NTLM SSP based
clients/servers (128-bit encryption and none)
I am running samba 4.5.0-2 on Arch Linux (4.7.4-1). Server-side, I have reset the user password, removed and re-added the user to the smbpasswd backend, and started and restarted the smbservice.
My smbconf is basically the default:
[global]
workgroup = MYGROUP
server string = Samba Server
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 50
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
unix password sync = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %nn *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %nn *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
dns proxy = no
[my share]
comment = my share
browseable = yes
writable = yes
guest ok = no
path = /pathto/myshare
public = no
valid users = myuser
create mask = 770
I don't see anything out of the ordinary in testparm, and I have confirmed via pdbedit that my user is definitely registered with the backend.
It has worked fine before today and I do not know why it suddenly stopped working. Any advice is greatly appreciated.
linux networking windows-10 encryption samba
add a comment |
I am trying to connect to a samba share with Windows 10 Pro (Version 1511, Build 10586.589) using the command net use L: \myservermyshare /u:myuser mypassword
. I get the error:
System error 86 - The specified network password is not correct.
I get the same result when using the Map network drive dialog.
Other clients (Android, Linux) can connect just fine with the same user/password.
I have tried adjusting the following security policies via secpol.msc:
- Microsoft network client: Send unencrypted password to third-party
SMB servers (enabled and disabled) - Netword security: LAN Manager authentication level (Send LM & NTLM responses, Send LM & NTLM - use NTLMv2 session security if negotiated
- Network security: Minimum session security for NTLM SSP based
clients/servers (128-bit encryption and none)
I am running samba 4.5.0-2 on Arch Linux (4.7.4-1). Server-side, I have reset the user password, removed and re-added the user to the smbpasswd backend, and started and restarted the smbservice.
My smbconf is basically the default:
[global]
workgroup = MYGROUP
server string = Samba Server
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 50
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
unix password sync = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %nn *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %nn *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
dns proxy = no
[my share]
comment = my share
browseable = yes
writable = yes
guest ok = no
path = /pathto/myshare
public = no
valid users = myuser
create mask = 770
I don't see anything out of the ordinary in testparm, and I have confirmed via pdbedit that my user is definitely registered with the backend.
It has worked fine before today and I do not know why it suddenly stopped working. Any advice is greatly appreciated.
linux networking windows-10 encryption samba
I am trying to connect to a samba share with Windows 10 Pro (Version 1511, Build 10586.589) using the command net use L: \myservermyshare /u:myuser mypassword
. I get the error:
System error 86 - The specified network password is not correct.
I get the same result when using the Map network drive dialog.
Other clients (Android, Linux) can connect just fine with the same user/password.
I have tried adjusting the following security policies via secpol.msc:
- Microsoft network client: Send unencrypted password to third-party
SMB servers (enabled and disabled) - Netword security: LAN Manager authentication level (Send LM & NTLM responses, Send LM & NTLM - use NTLMv2 session security if negotiated
- Network security: Minimum session security for NTLM SSP based
clients/servers (128-bit encryption and none)
I am running samba 4.5.0-2 on Arch Linux (4.7.4-1). Server-side, I have reset the user password, removed and re-added the user to the smbpasswd backend, and started and restarted the smbservice.
My smbconf is basically the default:
[global]
workgroup = MYGROUP
server string = Samba Server
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 50
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
unix password sync = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %nn *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %nn *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
dns proxy = no
[my share]
comment = my share
browseable = yes
writable = yes
guest ok = no
path = /pathto/myshare
public = no
valid users = myuser
create mask = 770
I don't see anything out of the ordinary in testparm, and I have confirmed via pdbedit that my user is definitely registered with the backend.
It has worked fine before today and I do not know why it suddenly stopped working. Any advice is greatly appreciated.
linux networking windows-10 encryption samba
linux networking windows-10 encryption samba
asked Sep 17 '16 at 18:20
romsroms
2401211
2401211
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
if anyone else runs into this problem, my solution was to adjust the security policies on the Windows client.
Run > Secpol.msc
then I set Local Policies > Security Options > Network Security: LAN Manager authentication level to 'Send NTLMv2 response only. Refuse LM & NTLM'
and the client connects just like before.
7
This solved it for me, but I didn't feel happy with it, as it requires a change on all my machines. Instead adding the linentlm auth = yes
to mysmb.conf
did the trick as well.
– Arsenal
Jun 19 '17 at 19:57
add a comment |
You can also fix this on the server (Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS) side:
In /etc/samba/smb.conf
, put:
ntlm auth = true
And it works like a charm.
add a comment |
The accepted answer is correct, and works for Windows 10 Professional and above. However, Windows 10 Home Premium lacks secpol.msc
and its easy-to-use interface.
To fix this on Windows 10 Home Premium, navigate to the following key in the registry:
HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlLsa
Look for a DWORD value named LmCompatibilityLevel
. If it does not exist, create it. Set the value to 5
.
After making this change, I was immediately able to access the Samba server without restarting.
Source: Changing LAN Manager Authentication on Windows NT
add a comment |
And when you get tired of fighting with Windows and Samba, go here:
https://github.com/billziss-gh/sshfs-win
It's file sharing over SSH. No need for Samba or trying to get Windows to play nice.
A software suggestion is not a valid answer to a configuration/troubleshooting question.
– timelmer
Jul 5 '18 at 5:47
1
For some people, this solution is good enough! Why downvote it just for semantic reasons?
– Blisterpeanuts
Jan 27 at 2:39
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1125438%2fwindows-10-password-error-with-samba-share%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
if anyone else runs into this problem, my solution was to adjust the security policies on the Windows client.
Run > Secpol.msc
then I set Local Policies > Security Options > Network Security: LAN Manager authentication level to 'Send NTLMv2 response only. Refuse LM & NTLM'
and the client connects just like before.
7
This solved it for me, but I didn't feel happy with it, as it requires a change on all my machines. Instead adding the linentlm auth = yes
to mysmb.conf
did the trick as well.
– Arsenal
Jun 19 '17 at 19:57
add a comment |
if anyone else runs into this problem, my solution was to adjust the security policies on the Windows client.
Run > Secpol.msc
then I set Local Policies > Security Options > Network Security: LAN Manager authentication level to 'Send NTLMv2 response only. Refuse LM & NTLM'
and the client connects just like before.
7
This solved it for me, but I didn't feel happy with it, as it requires a change on all my machines. Instead adding the linentlm auth = yes
to mysmb.conf
did the trick as well.
– Arsenal
Jun 19 '17 at 19:57
add a comment |
if anyone else runs into this problem, my solution was to adjust the security policies on the Windows client.
Run > Secpol.msc
then I set Local Policies > Security Options > Network Security: LAN Manager authentication level to 'Send NTLMv2 response only. Refuse LM & NTLM'
and the client connects just like before.
if anyone else runs into this problem, my solution was to adjust the security policies on the Windows client.
Run > Secpol.msc
then I set Local Policies > Security Options > Network Security: LAN Manager authentication level to 'Send NTLMv2 response only. Refuse LM & NTLM'
and the client connects just like before.
answered Sep 29 '16 at 1:37
romsroms
2401211
2401211
7
This solved it for me, but I didn't feel happy with it, as it requires a change on all my machines. Instead adding the linentlm auth = yes
to mysmb.conf
did the trick as well.
– Arsenal
Jun 19 '17 at 19:57
add a comment |
7
This solved it for me, but I didn't feel happy with it, as it requires a change on all my machines. Instead adding the linentlm auth = yes
to mysmb.conf
did the trick as well.
– Arsenal
Jun 19 '17 at 19:57
7
7
This solved it for me, but I didn't feel happy with it, as it requires a change on all my machines. Instead adding the line
ntlm auth = yes
to my smb.conf
did the trick as well.– Arsenal
Jun 19 '17 at 19:57
This solved it for me, but I didn't feel happy with it, as it requires a change on all my machines. Instead adding the line
ntlm auth = yes
to my smb.conf
did the trick as well.– Arsenal
Jun 19 '17 at 19:57
add a comment |
You can also fix this on the server (Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS) side:
In /etc/samba/smb.conf
, put:
ntlm auth = true
And it works like a charm.
add a comment |
You can also fix this on the server (Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS) side:
In /etc/samba/smb.conf
, put:
ntlm auth = true
And it works like a charm.
add a comment |
You can also fix this on the server (Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS) side:
In /etc/samba/smb.conf
, put:
ntlm auth = true
And it works like a charm.
You can also fix this on the server (Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS) side:
In /etc/samba/smb.conf
, put:
ntlm auth = true
And it works like a charm.
answered Aug 16 '18 at 8:47
NielsNiels
514
514
add a comment |
add a comment |
The accepted answer is correct, and works for Windows 10 Professional and above. However, Windows 10 Home Premium lacks secpol.msc
and its easy-to-use interface.
To fix this on Windows 10 Home Premium, navigate to the following key in the registry:
HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlLsa
Look for a DWORD value named LmCompatibilityLevel
. If it does not exist, create it. Set the value to 5
.
After making this change, I was immediately able to access the Samba server without restarting.
Source: Changing LAN Manager Authentication on Windows NT
add a comment |
The accepted answer is correct, and works for Windows 10 Professional and above. However, Windows 10 Home Premium lacks secpol.msc
and its easy-to-use interface.
To fix this on Windows 10 Home Premium, navigate to the following key in the registry:
HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlLsa
Look for a DWORD value named LmCompatibilityLevel
. If it does not exist, create it. Set the value to 5
.
After making this change, I was immediately able to access the Samba server without restarting.
Source: Changing LAN Manager Authentication on Windows NT
add a comment |
The accepted answer is correct, and works for Windows 10 Professional and above. However, Windows 10 Home Premium lacks secpol.msc
and its easy-to-use interface.
To fix this on Windows 10 Home Premium, navigate to the following key in the registry:
HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlLsa
Look for a DWORD value named LmCompatibilityLevel
. If it does not exist, create it. Set the value to 5
.
After making this change, I was immediately able to access the Samba server without restarting.
Source: Changing LAN Manager Authentication on Windows NT
The accepted answer is correct, and works for Windows 10 Professional and above. However, Windows 10 Home Premium lacks secpol.msc
and its easy-to-use interface.
To fix this on Windows 10 Home Premium, navigate to the following key in the registry:
HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlLsa
Look for a DWORD value named LmCompatibilityLevel
. If it does not exist, create it. Set the value to 5
.
After making this change, I was immediately able to access the Samba server without restarting.
Source: Changing LAN Manager Authentication on Windows NT
answered Feb 14 '17 at 22:34
user76225
add a comment |
add a comment |
And when you get tired of fighting with Windows and Samba, go here:
https://github.com/billziss-gh/sshfs-win
It's file sharing over SSH. No need for Samba or trying to get Windows to play nice.
A software suggestion is not a valid answer to a configuration/troubleshooting question.
– timelmer
Jul 5 '18 at 5:47
1
For some people, this solution is good enough! Why downvote it just for semantic reasons?
– Blisterpeanuts
Jan 27 at 2:39
add a comment |
And when you get tired of fighting with Windows and Samba, go here:
https://github.com/billziss-gh/sshfs-win
It's file sharing over SSH. No need for Samba or trying to get Windows to play nice.
A software suggestion is not a valid answer to a configuration/troubleshooting question.
– timelmer
Jul 5 '18 at 5:47
1
For some people, this solution is good enough! Why downvote it just for semantic reasons?
– Blisterpeanuts
Jan 27 at 2:39
add a comment |
And when you get tired of fighting with Windows and Samba, go here:
https://github.com/billziss-gh/sshfs-win
It's file sharing over SSH. No need for Samba or trying to get Windows to play nice.
And when you get tired of fighting with Windows and Samba, go here:
https://github.com/billziss-gh/sshfs-win
It's file sharing over SSH. No need for Samba or trying to get Windows to play nice.
answered Feb 22 '18 at 15:50
mcmacersonmcmacerson
1252
1252
A software suggestion is not a valid answer to a configuration/troubleshooting question.
– timelmer
Jul 5 '18 at 5:47
1
For some people, this solution is good enough! Why downvote it just for semantic reasons?
– Blisterpeanuts
Jan 27 at 2:39
add a comment |
A software suggestion is not a valid answer to a configuration/troubleshooting question.
– timelmer
Jul 5 '18 at 5:47
1
For some people, this solution is good enough! Why downvote it just for semantic reasons?
– Blisterpeanuts
Jan 27 at 2:39
A software suggestion is not a valid answer to a configuration/troubleshooting question.
– timelmer
Jul 5 '18 at 5:47
A software suggestion is not a valid answer to a configuration/troubleshooting question.
– timelmer
Jul 5 '18 at 5:47
1
1
For some people, this solution is good enough! Why downvote it just for semantic reasons?
– Blisterpeanuts
Jan 27 at 2:39
For some people, this solution is good enough! Why downvote it just for semantic reasons?
– Blisterpeanuts
Jan 27 at 2:39
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1125438%2fwindows-10-password-error-with-samba-share%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown