Enable ~4K (3840 X 2160) resolution on Windows 7 with Intel HD Graphics card The 2019 Stack...
Are there incongruent pythagorean triangles with the same perimeter and same area?
Shouldn't "much" here be used instead of "more"?
Why is the maximum length of OpenWrt’s root password 8 characters?
Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?
Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?
Why can Shazam fly?
FPGA - DIY Programming
Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?
Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible?
What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?
What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation
Resizing object distorts it (Illustrator CC 2018)
Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?
What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?
What is the accessibility of a package's `Private` context variables?
Am I thawing this London Broil safely?
How technical should a Scrum Master be to effectively remove impediments?
slides for 30min~1hr skype tenure track application interview
Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit
Is bread bad for ducks?
Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?
When should I buy a clipper card after flying to OAK?
Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?
The difference between dialogue marks
Enable ~4K (3840 X 2160) resolution on Windows 7 with Intel HD Graphics card
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCustom screen resolutions with Intel graphics cardAdd custom resolution to Control Panel in Windowsmonitor native resolution not available with amd graphics cardUse of second monitor in an Intel GMA HD graphics cardCustom resolution in VirtualBox Windows 8 with Guest AdditionsCan't create custom resolution using intel custom mode app in windows 8.1Higher than 1920 x 1080 resolution with Intel 4000 graphics chipsetAre video card resolution specs per-display or overall total when using multiple displays?Scaling versus resolution on Windows 10 Display settings?How do I change Windows 10 to a resolution for a screen that's not connected?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I have a DELL E7450 laptop connected via an HDMI cable to a DELL UP3214Q monitor (which can display 3840x2160 @ 60Hz with a DP1.2 cable) . Ubuntu 14.10 uses the 3840 X 2160 resolution just fine - although @ 30Hz (which I don't mind). No drivers required. xrandr
shows:
HDMI1 connected 3840x2160+1920+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 392mm
3840x2160 30.0*+ 25.0 24.0 30.0 24.0
1920x1200 60.0
But Windows 7 64-bit only sees 1920x1080 as the maximum resolution. The Intel HD Graphics 5500 settings allow for custom resolutions, but the maximum I could set was 2560 x 1440 @ 30Hz. Beyond that, everything would error with
The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity
This error is obviously completely bogus!
Also, I accidentally managed to get 3840x2160 @ 30Hz as a regular resolution in Control Panel after I booted back from Ubuntu into Windows once. This trick didn't work after rebooting windows once again to install some updated. I hadn't installed anything else in Windows, or changed any settings. Before booting into Ubuntu, I had rebooted Windows several times, so I'd rule out rebooting itself as a solution. Could Ubuntu have written some information to the graphics card or the monitor?
Other things I've tried - nothing worked:
- Installed the Dell Display Manager: it can't do anything about resolutions
- Installed Entec PowerStrip. It detects the maximum resolution but can't set it, even after adding it from Custom Resolution.
- tried to install Intel's native HD Graphics driver, but is says "The driver being installed is not validated for this computer. Please obtain the appropriate driver from the computer manufacturer."
- updated Dell's Intel HD video driver
- I've already installed the monitor driver and the monitor shows correctly by name in Device Manager. Still, no native resolution shows up anywhere.
Custom Resolution Utility allegedly doesn't work on Intel graphics cards. I've run, and it gave no error about the graphics card being Intel. It flickered the monitor and ultimately reset it 1920x1080, but didn't help at all with 4K.
Display Changer - seems to just pick up whatever resolutions are in the Registry- disconnect the laptop's internal display, and only "connect to projector"
There's an Intel Community thread on the buggy "The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity", but the Intel rep there isn't listening.
This is a nearly $2000 4K monitor that doesn't display 4K in Windows 7.
What else can I try?
windows-7 resolution 4k-resolution
|
show 5 more comments
I have a DELL E7450 laptop connected via an HDMI cable to a DELL UP3214Q monitor (which can display 3840x2160 @ 60Hz with a DP1.2 cable) . Ubuntu 14.10 uses the 3840 X 2160 resolution just fine - although @ 30Hz (which I don't mind). No drivers required. xrandr
shows:
HDMI1 connected 3840x2160+1920+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 392mm
3840x2160 30.0*+ 25.0 24.0 30.0 24.0
1920x1200 60.0
But Windows 7 64-bit only sees 1920x1080 as the maximum resolution. The Intel HD Graphics 5500 settings allow for custom resolutions, but the maximum I could set was 2560 x 1440 @ 30Hz. Beyond that, everything would error with
The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity
This error is obviously completely bogus!
Also, I accidentally managed to get 3840x2160 @ 30Hz as a regular resolution in Control Panel after I booted back from Ubuntu into Windows once. This trick didn't work after rebooting windows once again to install some updated. I hadn't installed anything else in Windows, or changed any settings. Before booting into Ubuntu, I had rebooted Windows several times, so I'd rule out rebooting itself as a solution. Could Ubuntu have written some information to the graphics card or the monitor?
Other things I've tried - nothing worked:
- Installed the Dell Display Manager: it can't do anything about resolutions
- Installed Entec PowerStrip. It detects the maximum resolution but can't set it, even after adding it from Custom Resolution.
- tried to install Intel's native HD Graphics driver, but is says "The driver being installed is not validated for this computer. Please obtain the appropriate driver from the computer manufacturer."
- updated Dell's Intel HD video driver
- I've already installed the monitor driver and the monitor shows correctly by name in Device Manager. Still, no native resolution shows up anywhere.
Custom Resolution Utility allegedly doesn't work on Intel graphics cards. I've run, and it gave no error about the graphics card being Intel. It flickered the monitor and ultimately reset it 1920x1080, but didn't help at all with 4K.
Display Changer - seems to just pick up whatever resolutions are in the Registry- disconnect the laptop's internal display, and only "connect to projector"
There's an Intel Community thread on the buggy "The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity", but the Intel rep there isn't listening.
This is a nearly $2000 4K monitor that doesn't display 4K in Windows 7.
What else can I try?
windows-7 resolution 4k-resolution
This says maximum resolution isHDMI: 4096 x 2304, 3840 x 2160 @ 24 Hz / 24bpp
. Not sure why it would be different in Ubuntu. Was the 60Hz actually there?
– MC10
Aug 14 '15 at 16:25
@MC10: actually I didn't explicitly see 60Hz (added a screenshot), but never saw anything slower than I'm used to. By comparison, the 30Hz custom resolution in Windows was just bad - even the mouse moved visibly more slowly.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 14 '15 at 16:56
@BalaSivakumar: what do you mean? On the exact same hardware combination, Ubuntu handles the resolution just fine. I simply want the same in Windows.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 14 '15 at 17:05
Hmm that's weird. I wonder if there's some limitation of Windows that Ubuntu does not have. What doesxrandr
output for the Ubuntu? It should show a Hz value.
– MC10
Aug 14 '15 at 17:41
@MC10 As indicated by thexrandr
line, it’s 30 Hz. Which is what you could expect over HDMI 1.4. Sadly, I couldn’t get that resolution to run with my Sandy Bridge notebook. :(
– Daniel B
Aug 16 '15 at 10:13
|
show 5 more comments
I have a DELL E7450 laptop connected via an HDMI cable to a DELL UP3214Q monitor (which can display 3840x2160 @ 60Hz with a DP1.2 cable) . Ubuntu 14.10 uses the 3840 X 2160 resolution just fine - although @ 30Hz (which I don't mind). No drivers required. xrandr
shows:
HDMI1 connected 3840x2160+1920+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 392mm
3840x2160 30.0*+ 25.0 24.0 30.0 24.0
1920x1200 60.0
But Windows 7 64-bit only sees 1920x1080 as the maximum resolution. The Intel HD Graphics 5500 settings allow for custom resolutions, but the maximum I could set was 2560 x 1440 @ 30Hz. Beyond that, everything would error with
The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity
This error is obviously completely bogus!
Also, I accidentally managed to get 3840x2160 @ 30Hz as a regular resolution in Control Panel after I booted back from Ubuntu into Windows once. This trick didn't work after rebooting windows once again to install some updated. I hadn't installed anything else in Windows, or changed any settings. Before booting into Ubuntu, I had rebooted Windows several times, so I'd rule out rebooting itself as a solution. Could Ubuntu have written some information to the graphics card or the monitor?
Other things I've tried - nothing worked:
- Installed the Dell Display Manager: it can't do anything about resolutions
- Installed Entec PowerStrip. It detects the maximum resolution but can't set it, even after adding it from Custom Resolution.
- tried to install Intel's native HD Graphics driver, but is says "The driver being installed is not validated for this computer. Please obtain the appropriate driver from the computer manufacturer."
- updated Dell's Intel HD video driver
- I've already installed the monitor driver and the monitor shows correctly by name in Device Manager. Still, no native resolution shows up anywhere.
Custom Resolution Utility allegedly doesn't work on Intel graphics cards. I've run, and it gave no error about the graphics card being Intel. It flickered the monitor and ultimately reset it 1920x1080, but didn't help at all with 4K.
Display Changer - seems to just pick up whatever resolutions are in the Registry- disconnect the laptop's internal display, and only "connect to projector"
There's an Intel Community thread on the buggy "The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity", but the Intel rep there isn't listening.
This is a nearly $2000 4K monitor that doesn't display 4K in Windows 7.
What else can I try?
windows-7 resolution 4k-resolution
I have a DELL E7450 laptop connected via an HDMI cable to a DELL UP3214Q monitor (which can display 3840x2160 @ 60Hz with a DP1.2 cable) . Ubuntu 14.10 uses the 3840 X 2160 resolution just fine - although @ 30Hz (which I don't mind). No drivers required. xrandr
shows:
HDMI1 connected 3840x2160+1920+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 392mm
3840x2160 30.0*+ 25.0 24.0 30.0 24.0
1920x1200 60.0
But Windows 7 64-bit only sees 1920x1080 as the maximum resolution. The Intel HD Graphics 5500 settings allow for custom resolutions, but the maximum I could set was 2560 x 1440 @ 30Hz. Beyond that, everything would error with
The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity
This error is obviously completely bogus!
Also, I accidentally managed to get 3840x2160 @ 30Hz as a regular resolution in Control Panel after I booted back from Ubuntu into Windows once. This trick didn't work after rebooting windows once again to install some updated. I hadn't installed anything else in Windows, or changed any settings. Before booting into Ubuntu, I had rebooted Windows several times, so I'd rule out rebooting itself as a solution. Could Ubuntu have written some information to the graphics card or the monitor?
Other things I've tried - nothing worked:
- Installed the Dell Display Manager: it can't do anything about resolutions
- Installed Entec PowerStrip. It detects the maximum resolution but can't set it, even after adding it from Custom Resolution.
- tried to install Intel's native HD Graphics driver, but is says "The driver being installed is not validated for this computer. Please obtain the appropriate driver from the computer manufacturer."
- updated Dell's Intel HD video driver
- I've already installed the monitor driver and the monitor shows correctly by name in Device Manager. Still, no native resolution shows up anywhere.
Custom Resolution Utility allegedly doesn't work on Intel graphics cards. I've run, and it gave no error about the graphics card being Intel. It flickered the monitor and ultimately reset it 1920x1080, but didn't help at all with 4K.
Display Changer - seems to just pick up whatever resolutions are in the Registry- disconnect the laptop's internal display, and only "connect to projector"
There's an Intel Community thread on the buggy "The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity", but the Intel rep there isn't listening.
This is a nearly $2000 4K monitor that doesn't display 4K in Windows 7.
What else can I try?
windows-7 resolution 4k-resolution
windows-7 resolution 4k-resolution
edited Aug 25 '15 at 17:10
Dan Dascalescu
asked Aug 14 '15 at 16:15
Dan DascalescuDan Dascalescu
2,42842947
2,42842947
This says maximum resolution isHDMI: 4096 x 2304, 3840 x 2160 @ 24 Hz / 24bpp
. Not sure why it would be different in Ubuntu. Was the 60Hz actually there?
– MC10
Aug 14 '15 at 16:25
@MC10: actually I didn't explicitly see 60Hz (added a screenshot), but never saw anything slower than I'm used to. By comparison, the 30Hz custom resolution in Windows was just bad - even the mouse moved visibly more slowly.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 14 '15 at 16:56
@BalaSivakumar: what do you mean? On the exact same hardware combination, Ubuntu handles the resolution just fine. I simply want the same in Windows.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 14 '15 at 17:05
Hmm that's weird. I wonder if there's some limitation of Windows that Ubuntu does not have. What doesxrandr
output for the Ubuntu? It should show a Hz value.
– MC10
Aug 14 '15 at 17:41
@MC10 As indicated by thexrandr
line, it’s 30 Hz. Which is what you could expect over HDMI 1.4. Sadly, I couldn’t get that resolution to run with my Sandy Bridge notebook. :(
– Daniel B
Aug 16 '15 at 10:13
|
show 5 more comments
This says maximum resolution isHDMI: 4096 x 2304, 3840 x 2160 @ 24 Hz / 24bpp
. Not sure why it would be different in Ubuntu. Was the 60Hz actually there?
– MC10
Aug 14 '15 at 16:25
@MC10: actually I didn't explicitly see 60Hz (added a screenshot), but never saw anything slower than I'm used to. By comparison, the 30Hz custom resolution in Windows was just bad - even the mouse moved visibly more slowly.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 14 '15 at 16:56
@BalaSivakumar: what do you mean? On the exact same hardware combination, Ubuntu handles the resolution just fine. I simply want the same in Windows.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 14 '15 at 17:05
Hmm that's weird. I wonder if there's some limitation of Windows that Ubuntu does not have. What doesxrandr
output for the Ubuntu? It should show a Hz value.
– MC10
Aug 14 '15 at 17:41
@MC10 As indicated by thexrandr
line, it’s 30 Hz. Which is what you could expect over HDMI 1.4. Sadly, I couldn’t get that resolution to run with my Sandy Bridge notebook. :(
– Daniel B
Aug 16 '15 at 10:13
This says maximum resolution is
HDMI: 4096 x 2304, 3840 x 2160 @ 24 Hz / 24bpp
. Not sure why it would be different in Ubuntu. Was the 60Hz actually there?– MC10
Aug 14 '15 at 16:25
This says maximum resolution is
HDMI: 4096 x 2304, 3840 x 2160 @ 24 Hz / 24bpp
. Not sure why it would be different in Ubuntu. Was the 60Hz actually there?– MC10
Aug 14 '15 at 16:25
@MC10: actually I didn't explicitly see 60Hz (added a screenshot), but never saw anything slower than I'm used to. By comparison, the 30Hz custom resolution in Windows was just bad - even the mouse moved visibly more slowly.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 14 '15 at 16:56
@MC10: actually I didn't explicitly see 60Hz (added a screenshot), but never saw anything slower than I'm used to. By comparison, the 30Hz custom resolution in Windows was just bad - even the mouse moved visibly more slowly.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 14 '15 at 16:56
@BalaSivakumar: what do you mean? On the exact same hardware combination, Ubuntu handles the resolution just fine. I simply want the same in Windows.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 14 '15 at 17:05
@BalaSivakumar: what do you mean? On the exact same hardware combination, Ubuntu handles the resolution just fine. I simply want the same in Windows.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 14 '15 at 17:05
Hmm that's weird. I wonder if there's some limitation of Windows that Ubuntu does not have. What does
xrandr
output for the Ubuntu? It should show a Hz value.– MC10
Aug 14 '15 at 17:41
Hmm that's weird. I wonder if there's some limitation of Windows that Ubuntu does not have. What does
xrandr
output for the Ubuntu? It should show a Hz value.– MC10
Aug 14 '15 at 17:41
@MC10 As indicated by the
xrandr
line, it’s 30 Hz. Which is what you could expect over HDMI 1.4. Sadly, I couldn’t get that resolution to run with my Sandy Bridge notebook. :(– Daniel B
Aug 16 '15 at 10:13
@MC10 As indicated by the
xrandr
line, it’s 30 Hz. Which is what you could expect over HDMI 1.4. Sadly, I couldn’t get that resolution to run with my Sandy Bridge notebook. :(– Daniel B
Aug 16 '15 at 10:13
|
show 5 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The only thing that has worked so far was buying a Mini-DisplayPort to DisplayPort 1.2 cable. 3840x2160 @ 60Hz works great now.
It's disappointing that the Intel folks refuse to acknowledge the "maximum bandwidth exceeded" bug.
@fixer1234: I'm so incredibly frustrated by this.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 25 '15 at 15:53
"What doesn't kill you makes you stronger." :-)
– fixer1234
Aug 27 '15 at 21:45
@DanDascalescu - Im not sure if this is one of the speed breakers but both DP & HDMI standards for 4K is kind of in flux these days - video cards, cables etc. Maybe that HDMI cable has limitations and is not compliant to the higher than 1080p spec or querying Display via it had issues . And maybe Ubuntu bypasses the querying. lots of such stuff on overclock.net forums
– Alex S
Aug 27 '15 at 22:25
add a comment |
The Intel HD Graphics 4000 drivers for Windows allow the creation of custom resolutions. (I know, why on earth would it not recognize the 4k standard like Linux does!?)
Anyhow, on this dialog box create a 3840 x 2160 pixel resolution at 24Hz AND(!!) Select CVT-RB as the Timing Standard.
It should ask you to confirm, then close that app. Next time you plug in the monitor (it does have to be rediscovered by Windows) and open up the Windows Display Settings dialog box, pick the 4k monitor, in resolution, you will have the option to pick 3840x2160 - it should even have the tag 'Recommended'.
You seem to be saying what to do but not how to do it. How does one create a custom resolution? (Also, the OP has already tried custom resolutions without success.)
– Scott
Sep 30 '18 at 18:11
the OP did do a custom resolution - and set it to 30Hz. I am informing that the correct setting is 24Hz, and to tweak the timing standard to CVT-RB.
– Mark van der Pol
Nov 29 '18 at 23:30
add a comment |
Intel HD Graphics 4000 can handle 4K @ 30p Hz with this steps and special Monitor
- Mac Mini Late 2012 with "Intel HD Graphics 4000"
- Boot Camp Installation of Windows 7
Install Intel HD Graphics 4000 Drivers version 9.17.10.3347 (Legacy)
find this inside Boot Camp @ support.apple.com/kb/DL1720?locale=en_US
Path: BootCampDriversIntelBootCamp5.1.5621.zipBootCampDriversSamsung Monitor 4K U28E590
This the the trick! This monitor have Picture in Picture Option.From the windows Bar Open Intel Graphics Properties
- Advanced Mode
- Display --> Custom Resolutions
- Width=1920, Height=2160, Color Depth=All Colors,
Refresh Rate=30, Timing Standard=CVT-RB ---> Add Restart your Computer.
Connect both cables Mini-Port--> HDMI, and HDMI-->HDMI to this monitor
- On the monitor turn on Picture in picture and split in two the screen
- On Windows, Rich click on the Desktop --> Screen resolutions and arrange
both displays like this image
Hope this helps
Now I need to figure it out how to do this on OS X El Capitan, cause I know tha is a fact that this Video Card is fully capable of 4K with this Monitor :)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f957222%2fenable-4k-3840-x-2160-resolution-on-windows-7-with-intel-hd-graphics-card%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The only thing that has worked so far was buying a Mini-DisplayPort to DisplayPort 1.2 cable. 3840x2160 @ 60Hz works great now.
It's disappointing that the Intel folks refuse to acknowledge the "maximum bandwidth exceeded" bug.
@fixer1234: I'm so incredibly frustrated by this.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 25 '15 at 15:53
"What doesn't kill you makes you stronger." :-)
– fixer1234
Aug 27 '15 at 21:45
@DanDascalescu - Im not sure if this is one of the speed breakers but both DP & HDMI standards for 4K is kind of in flux these days - video cards, cables etc. Maybe that HDMI cable has limitations and is not compliant to the higher than 1080p spec or querying Display via it had issues . And maybe Ubuntu bypasses the querying. lots of such stuff on overclock.net forums
– Alex S
Aug 27 '15 at 22:25
add a comment |
The only thing that has worked so far was buying a Mini-DisplayPort to DisplayPort 1.2 cable. 3840x2160 @ 60Hz works great now.
It's disappointing that the Intel folks refuse to acknowledge the "maximum bandwidth exceeded" bug.
@fixer1234: I'm so incredibly frustrated by this.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 25 '15 at 15:53
"What doesn't kill you makes you stronger." :-)
– fixer1234
Aug 27 '15 at 21:45
@DanDascalescu - Im not sure if this is one of the speed breakers but both DP & HDMI standards for 4K is kind of in flux these days - video cards, cables etc. Maybe that HDMI cable has limitations and is not compliant to the higher than 1080p spec or querying Display via it had issues . And maybe Ubuntu bypasses the querying. lots of such stuff on overclock.net forums
– Alex S
Aug 27 '15 at 22:25
add a comment |
The only thing that has worked so far was buying a Mini-DisplayPort to DisplayPort 1.2 cable. 3840x2160 @ 60Hz works great now.
It's disappointing that the Intel folks refuse to acknowledge the "maximum bandwidth exceeded" bug.
The only thing that has worked so far was buying a Mini-DisplayPort to DisplayPort 1.2 cable. 3840x2160 @ 60Hz works great now.
It's disappointing that the Intel folks refuse to acknowledge the "maximum bandwidth exceeded" bug.
edited Aug 27 '15 at 21:31
answered Aug 16 '15 at 10:06
Dan DascalescuDan Dascalescu
2,42842947
2,42842947
@fixer1234: I'm so incredibly frustrated by this.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 25 '15 at 15:53
"What doesn't kill you makes you stronger." :-)
– fixer1234
Aug 27 '15 at 21:45
@DanDascalescu - Im not sure if this is one of the speed breakers but both DP & HDMI standards for 4K is kind of in flux these days - video cards, cables etc. Maybe that HDMI cable has limitations and is not compliant to the higher than 1080p spec or querying Display via it had issues . And maybe Ubuntu bypasses the querying. lots of such stuff on overclock.net forums
– Alex S
Aug 27 '15 at 22:25
add a comment |
@fixer1234: I'm so incredibly frustrated by this.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 25 '15 at 15:53
"What doesn't kill you makes you stronger." :-)
– fixer1234
Aug 27 '15 at 21:45
@DanDascalescu - Im not sure if this is one of the speed breakers but both DP & HDMI standards for 4K is kind of in flux these days - video cards, cables etc. Maybe that HDMI cable has limitations and is not compliant to the higher than 1080p spec or querying Display via it had issues . And maybe Ubuntu bypasses the querying. lots of such stuff on overclock.net forums
– Alex S
Aug 27 '15 at 22:25
@fixer1234: I'm so incredibly frustrated by this.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 25 '15 at 15:53
@fixer1234: I'm so incredibly frustrated by this.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 25 '15 at 15:53
"What doesn't kill you makes you stronger." :-)
– fixer1234
Aug 27 '15 at 21:45
"What doesn't kill you makes you stronger." :-)
– fixer1234
Aug 27 '15 at 21:45
@DanDascalescu - Im not sure if this is one of the speed breakers but both DP & HDMI standards for 4K is kind of in flux these days - video cards, cables etc. Maybe that HDMI cable has limitations and is not compliant to the higher than 1080p spec or querying Display via it had issues . And maybe Ubuntu bypasses the querying. lots of such stuff on overclock.net forums
– Alex S
Aug 27 '15 at 22:25
@DanDascalescu - Im not sure if this is one of the speed breakers but both DP & HDMI standards for 4K is kind of in flux these days - video cards, cables etc. Maybe that HDMI cable has limitations and is not compliant to the higher than 1080p spec or querying Display via it had issues . And maybe Ubuntu bypasses the querying. lots of such stuff on overclock.net forums
– Alex S
Aug 27 '15 at 22:25
add a comment |
The Intel HD Graphics 4000 drivers for Windows allow the creation of custom resolutions. (I know, why on earth would it not recognize the 4k standard like Linux does!?)
Anyhow, on this dialog box create a 3840 x 2160 pixel resolution at 24Hz AND(!!) Select CVT-RB as the Timing Standard.
It should ask you to confirm, then close that app. Next time you plug in the monitor (it does have to be rediscovered by Windows) and open up the Windows Display Settings dialog box, pick the 4k monitor, in resolution, you will have the option to pick 3840x2160 - it should even have the tag 'Recommended'.
You seem to be saying what to do but not how to do it. How does one create a custom resolution? (Also, the OP has already tried custom resolutions without success.)
– Scott
Sep 30 '18 at 18:11
the OP did do a custom resolution - and set it to 30Hz. I am informing that the correct setting is 24Hz, and to tweak the timing standard to CVT-RB.
– Mark van der Pol
Nov 29 '18 at 23:30
add a comment |
The Intel HD Graphics 4000 drivers for Windows allow the creation of custom resolutions. (I know, why on earth would it not recognize the 4k standard like Linux does!?)
Anyhow, on this dialog box create a 3840 x 2160 pixel resolution at 24Hz AND(!!) Select CVT-RB as the Timing Standard.
It should ask you to confirm, then close that app. Next time you plug in the monitor (it does have to be rediscovered by Windows) and open up the Windows Display Settings dialog box, pick the 4k monitor, in resolution, you will have the option to pick 3840x2160 - it should even have the tag 'Recommended'.
You seem to be saying what to do but not how to do it. How does one create a custom resolution? (Also, the OP has already tried custom resolutions without success.)
– Scott
Sep 30 '18 at 18:11
the OP did do a custom resolution - and set it to 30Hz. I am informing that the correct setting is 24Hz, and to tweak the timing standard to CVT-RB.
– Mark van der Pol
Nov 29 '18 at 23:30
add a comment |
The Intel HD Graphics 4000 drivers for Windows allow the creation of custom resolutions. (I know, why on earth would it not recognize the 4k standard like Linux does!?)
Anyhow, on this dialog box create a 3840 x 2160 pixel resolution at 24Hz AND(!!) Select CVT-RB as the Timing Standard.
It should ask you to confirm, then close that app. Next time you plug in the monitor (it does have to be rediscovered by Windows) and open up the Windows Display Settings dialog box, pick the 4k monitor, in resolution, you will have the option to pick 3840x2160 - it should even have the tag 'Recommended'.
The Intel HD Graphics 4000 drivers for Windows allow the creation of custom resolutions. (I know, why on earth would it not recognize the 4k standard like Linux does!?)
Anyhow, on this dialog box create a 3840 x 2160 pixel resolution at 24Hz AND(!!) Select CVT-RB as the Timing Standard.
It should ask you to confirm, then close that app. Next time you plug in the monitor (it does have to be rediscovered by Windows) and open up the Windows Display Settings dialog box, pick the 4k monitor, in resolution, you will have the option to pick 3840x2160 - it should even have the tag 'Recommended'.
answered Sep 30 '18 at 17:48
Mark van der PolMark van der Pol
1
1
You seem to be saying what to do but not how to do it. How does one create a custom resolution? (Also, the OP has already tried custom resolutions without success.)
– Scott
Sep 30 '18 at 18:11
the OP did do a custom resolution - and set it to 30Hz. I am informing that the correct setting is 24Hz, and to tweak the timing standard to CVT-RB.
– Mark van der Pol
Nov 29 '18 at 23:30
add a comment |
You seem to be saying what to do but not how to do it. How does one create a custom resolution? (Also, the OP has already tried custom resolutions without success.)
– Scott
Sep 30 '18 at 18:11
the OP did do a custom resolution - and set it to 30Hz. I am informing that the correct setting is 24Hz, and to tweak the timing standard to CVT-RB.
– Mark van der Pol
Nov 29 '18 at 23:30
You seem to be saying what to do but not how to do it. How does one create a custom resolution? (Also, the OP has already tried custom resolutions without success.)
– Scott
Sep 30 '18 at 18:11
You seem to be saying what to do but not how to do it. How does one create a custom resolution? (Also, the OP has already tried custom resolutions without success.)
– Scott
Sep 30 '18 at 18:11
the OP did do a custom resolution - and set it to 30Hz. I am informing that the correct setting is 24Hz, and to tweak the timing standard to CVT-RB.
– Mark van der Pol
Nov 29 '18 at 23:30
the OP did do a custom resolution - and set it to 30Hz. I am informing that the correct setting is 24Hz, and to tweak the timing standard to CVT-RB.
– Mark van der Pol
Nov 29 '18 at 23:30
add a comment |
Intel HD Graphics 4000 can handle 4K @ 30p Hz with this steps and special Monitor
- Mac Mini Late 2012 with "Intel HD Graphics 4000"
- Boot Camp Installation of Windows 7
Install Intel HD Graphics 4000 Drivers version 9.17.10.3347 (Legacy)
find this inside Boot Camp @ support.apple.com/kb/DL1720?locale=en_US
Path: BootCampDriversIntelBootCamp5.1.5621.zipBootCampDriversSamsung Monitor 4K U28E590
This the the trick! This monitor have Picture in Picture Option.From the windows Bar Open Intel Graphics Properties
- Advanced Mode
- Display --> Custom Resolutions
- Width=1920, Height=2160, Color Depth=All Colors,
Refresh Rate=30, Timing Standard=CVT-RB ---> Add Restart your Computer.
Connect both cables Mini-Port--> HDMI, and HDMI-->HDMI to this monitor
- On the monitor turn on Picture in picture and split in two the screen
- On Windows, Rich click on the Desktop --> Screen resolutions and arrange
both displays like this image
Hope this helps
Now I need to figure it out how to do this on OS X El Capitan, cause I know tha is a fact that this Video Card is fully capable of 4K with this Monitor :)
add a comment |
Intel HD Graphics 4000 can handle 4K @ 30p Hz with this steps and special Monitor
- Mac Mini Late 2012 with "Intel HD Graphics 4000"
- Boot Camp Installation of Windows 7
Install Intel HD Graphics 4000 Drivers version 9.17.10.3347 (Legacy)
find this inside Boot Camp @ support.apple.com/kb/DL1720?locale=en_US
Path: BootCampDriversIntelBootCamp5.1.5621.zipBootCampDriversSamsung Monitor 4K U28E590
This the the trick! This monitor have Picture in Picture Option.From the windows Bar Open Intel Graphics Properties
- Advanced Mode
- Display --> Custom Resolutions
- Width=1920, Height=2160, Color Depth=All Colors,
Refresh Rate=30, Timing Standard=CVT-RB ---> Add Restart your Computer.
Connect both cables Mini-Port--> HDMI, and HDMI-->HDMI to this monitor
- On the monitor turn on Picture in picture and split in two the screen
- On Windows, Rich click on the Desktop --> Screen resolutions and arrange
both displays like this image
Hope this helps
Now I need to figure it out how to do this on OS X El Capitan, cause I know tha is a fact that this Video Card is fully capable of 4K with this Monitor :)
add a comment |
Intel HD Graphics 4000 can handle 4K @ 30p Hz with this steps and special Monitor
- Mac Mini Late 2012 with "Intel HD Graphics 4000"
- Boot Camp Installation of Windows 7
Install Intel HD Graphics 4000 Drivers version 9.17.10.3347 (Legacy)
find this inside Boot Camp @ support.apple.com/kb/DL1720?locale=en_US
Path: BootCampDriversIntelBootCamp5.1.5621.zipBootCampDriversSamsung Monitor 4K U28E590
This the the trick! This monitor have Picture in Picture Option.From the windows Bar Open Intel Graphics Properties
- Advanced Mode
- Display --> Custom Resolutions
- Width=1920, Height=2160, Color Depth=All Colors,
Refresh Rate=30, Timing Standard=CVT-RB ---> Add Restart your Computer.
Connect both cables Mini-Port--> HDMI, and HDMI-->HDMI to this monitor
- On the monitor turn on Picture in picture and split in two the screen
- On Windows, Rich click on the Desktop --> Screen resolutions and arrange
both displays like this image
Hope this helps
Now I need to figure it out how to do this on OS X El Capitan, cause I know tha is a fact that this Video Card is fully capable of 4K with this Monitor :)
Intel HD Graphics 4000 can handle 4K @ 30p Hz with this steps and special Monitor
- Mac Mini Late 2012 with "Intel HD Graphics 4000"
- Boot Camp Installation of Windows 7
Install Intel HD Graphics 4000 Drivers version 9.17.10.3347 (Legacy)
find this inside Boot Camp @ support.apple.com/kb/DL1720?locale=en_US
Path: BootCampDriversIntelBootCamp5.1.5621.zipBootCampDriversSamsung Monitor 4K U28E590
This the the trick! This monitor have Picture in Picture Option.From the windows Bar Open Intel Graphics Properties
- Advanced Mode
- Display --> Custom Resolutions
- Width=1920, Height=2160, Color Depth=All Colors,
Refresh Rate=30, Timing Standard=CVT-RB ---> Add Restart your Computer.
Connect both cables Mini-Port--> HDMI, and HDMI-->HDMI to this monitor
- On the monitor turn on Picture in picture and split in two the screen
- On Windows, Rich click on the Desktop --> Screen resolutions and arrange
both displays like this image
Hope this helps
Now I need to figure it out how to do this on OS X El Capitan, cause I know tha is a fact that this Video Card is fully capable of 4K with this Monitor :)
answered Mar 15 '16 at 17:33
Alejandro GarciaAlejandro Garcia
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f957222%2fenable-4k-3840-x-2160-resolution-on-windows-7-with-intel-hd-graphics-card%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
This says maximum resolution is
HDMI: 4096 x 2304, 3840 x 2160 @ 24 Hz / 24bpp
. Not sure why it would be different in Ubuntu. Was the 60Hz actually there?– MC10
Aug 14 '15 at 16:25
@MC10: actually I didn't explicitly see 60Hz (added a screenshot), but never saw anything slower than I'm used to. By comparison, the 30Hz custom resolution in Windows was just bad - even the mouse moved visibly more slowly.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 14 '15 at 16:56
@BalaSivakumar: what do you mean? On the exact same hardware combination, Ubuntu handles the resolution just fine. I simply want the same in Windows.
– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 14 '15 at 17:05
Hmm that's weird. I wonder if there's some limitation of Windows that Ubuntu does not have. What does
xrandr
output for the Ubuntu? It should show a Hz value.– MC10
Aug 14 '15 at 17:41
@MC10 As indicated by the
xrandr
line, it’s 30 Hz. Which is what you could expect over HDMI 1.4. Sadly, I couldn’t get that resolution to run with my Sandy Bridge notebook. :(– Daniel B
Aug 16 '15 at 10:13