Enable ~4K (3840 X 2160) resolution on Windows 7 with Intel HD Graphics card The 2019 Stack...

Are there incongruent pythagorean triangles with the same perimeter and same area?

Shouldn't "much" here be used instead of "more"?

Why is the maximum length of OpenWrt’s root password 8 characters?

Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?

Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?

Why can Shazam fly?

FPGA - DIY Programming

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible?

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

Resizing object distorts it (Illustrator CC 2018)

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

What is the accessibility of a package's `Private` context variables?

Am I thawing this London Broil safely?

How technical should a Scrum Master be to effectively remove impediments?

slides for 30min~1hr skype tenure track application interview

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit

Is bread bad for ducks?

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

When should I buy a clipper card after flying to OAK?

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

The difference between dialogue marks



Enable ~4K (3840 X 2160) resolution on Windows 7 with Intel HD Graphics card



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCustom screen resolutions with Intel graphics cardAdd custom resolution to Control Panel in Windowsmonitor native resolution not available with amd graphics cardUse of second monitor in an Intel GMA HD graphics cardCustom resolution in VirtualBox Windows 8 with Guest AdditionsCan't create custom resolution using intel custom mode app in windows 8.1Higher than 1920 x 1080 resolution with Intel 4000 graphics chipsetAre video card resolution specs per-display or overall total when using multiple displays?Scaling versus resolution on Windows 10 Display settings?How do I change Windows 10 to a resolution for a screen that's not connected?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







9















I have a DELL E7450 laptop connected via an HDMI cable to a DELL UP3214Q monitor (which can display 3840x2160 @ 60Hz with a DP1.2 cable) . Ubuntu 14.10 uses the 3840 X 2160 resolution just fine - although @ 30Hz (which I don't mind). No drivers required. xrandr shows:



HDMI1 connected 3840x2160+1920+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 392mm
3840x2160 30.0*+ 25.0 24.0 30.0 24.0
1920x1200 60.0


Ubuntu 4K



But Windows 7 64-bit only sees 1920x1080 as the maximum resolution. The Intel HD Graphics 5500 settings allow for custom resolutions, but the maximum I could set was 2560 x 1440 @ 30Hz. Beyond that, everything would error with




The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity




This error is obviously completely bogus!



Also, I accidentally managed to get 3840x2160 @ 30Hz as a regular resolution in Control Panel after I booted back from Ubuntu into Windows once. This trick didn't work after rebooting windows once again to install some updated. I hadn't installed anything else in Windows, or changed any settings. Before booting into Ubuntu, I had rebooted Windows several times, so I'd rule out rebooting itself as a solution. Could Ubuntu have written some information to the graphics card or the monitor?



Other things I've tried - nothing worked:




  • Installed the Dell Display Manager: it can't do anything about resolutions

  • Installed Entec PowerStrip. It detects the maximum resolution but can't set it, even after adding it from Custom Resolution.
    enter image description here

  • tried to install Intel's native HD Graphics driver, but is says "The driver being installed is not validated for this computer. Please obtain the appropriate driver from the computer manufacturer."

  • updated Dell's Intel HD video driver

  • I've already installed the monitor driver and the monitor shows correctly by name in Device Manager. Still, no native resolution shows up anywhere.


  • Custom Resolution Utility allegedly doesn't work on Intel graphics cards. I've run, and it gave no error about the graphics card being Intel. It flickered the monitor and ultimately reset it 1920x1080, but didn't help at all with 4K.


  • Display Changer - seems to just pick up whatever resolutions are in the Registry

  • disconnect the laptop's internal display, and only "connect to projector"


There's an Intel Community thread on the buggy "The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity", but the Intel rep there isn't listening.



This is a nearly $2000 4K monitor that doesn't display 4K in Windows 7.



What else can I try?










share|improve this question

























  • This says maximum resolution is HDMI: 4096 x 2304, 3840 x 2160 @ 24 Hz / 24bpp. Not sure why it would be different in Ubuntu. Was the 60Hz actually there?

    – MC10
    Aug 14 '15 at 16:25











  • @MC10: actually I didn't explicitly see 60Hz (added a screenshot), but never saw anything slower than I'm used to. By comparison, the 30Hz custom resolution in Windows was just bad - even the mouse moved visibly more slowly.

    – Dan Dascalescu
    Aug 14 '15 at 16:56













  • @BalaSivakumar: what do you mean? On the exact same hardware combination, Ubuntu handles the resolution just fine. I simply want the same in Windows.

    – Dan Dascalescu
    Aug 14 '15 at 17:05











  • Hmm that's weird. I wonder if there's some limitation of Windows that Ubuntu does not have. What does xrandr output for the Ubuntu? It should show a Hz value.

    – MC10
    Aug 14 '15 at 17:41











  • @MC10 As indicated by the xrandr line, it’s 30 Hz. Which is what you could expect over HDMI 1.4. Sadly, I couldn’t get that resolution to run with my Sandy Bridge notebook. :(

    – Daniel B
    Aug 16 '15 at 10:13


















9















I have a DELL E7450 laptop connected via an HDMI cable to a DELL UP3214Q monitor (which can display 3840x2160 @ 60Hz with a DP1.2 cable) . Ubuntu 14.10 uses the 3840 X 2160 resolution just fine - although @ 30Hz (which I don't mind). No drivers required. xrandr shows:



HDMI1 connected 3840x2160+1920+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 392mm
3840x2160 30.0*+ 25.0 24.0 30.0 24.0
1920x1200 60.0


Ubuntu 4K



But Windows 7 64-bit only sees 1920x1080 as the maximum resolution. The Intel HD Graphics 5500 settings allow for custom resolutions, but the maximum I could set was 2560 x 1440 @ 30Hz. Beyond that, everything would error with




The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity




This error is obviously completely bogus!



Also, I accidentally managed to get 3840x2160 @ 30Hz as a regular resolution in Control Panel after I booted back from Ubuntu into Windows once. This trick didn't work after rebooting windows once again to install some updated. I hadn't installed anything else in Windows, or changed any settings. Before booting into Ubuntu, I had rebooted Windows several times, so I'd rule out rebooting itself as a solution. Could Ubuntu have written some information to the graphics card or the monitor?



Other things I've tried - nothing worked:




  • Installed the Dell Display Manager: it can't do anything about resolutions

  • Installed Entec PowerStrip. It detects the maximum resolution but can't set it, even after adding it from Custom Resolution.
    enter image description here

  • tried to install Intel's native HD Graphics driver, but is says "The driver being installed is not validated for this computer. Please obtain the appropriate driver from the computer manufacturer."

  • updated Dell's Intel HD video driver

  • I've already installed the monitor driver and the monitor shows correctly by name in Device Manager. Still, no native resolution shows up anywhere.


  • Custom Resolution Utility allegedly doesn't work on Intel graphics cards. I've run, and it gave no error about the graphics card being Intel. It flickered the monitor and ultimately reset it 1920x1080, but didn't help at all with 4K.


  • Display Changer - seems to just pick up whatever resolutions are in the Registry

  • disconnect the laptop's internal display, and only "connect to projector"


There's an Intel Community thread on the buggy "The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity", but the Intel rep there isn't listening.



This is a nearly $2000 4K monitor that doesn't display 4K in Windows 7.



What else can I try?










share|improve this question

























  • This says maximum resolution is HDMI: 4096 x 2304, 3840 x 2160 @ 24 Hz / 24bpp. Not sure why it would be different in Ubuntu. Was the 60Hz actually there?

    – MC10
    Aug 14 '15 at 16:25











  • @MC10: actually I didn't explicitly see 60Hz (added a screenshot), but never saw anything slower than I'm used to. By comparison, the 30Hz custom resolution in Windows was just bad - even the mouse moved visibly more slowly.

    – Dan Dascalescu
    Aug 14 '15 at 16:56













  • @BalaSivakumar: what do you mean? On the exact same hardware combination, Ubuntu handles the resolution just fine. I simply want the same in Windows.

    – Dan Dascalescu
    Aug 14 '15 at 17:05











  • Hmm that's weird. I wonder if there's some limitation of Windows that Ubuntu does not have. What does xrandr output for the Ubuntu? It should show a Hz value.

    – MC10
    Aug 14 '15 at 17:41











  • @MC10 As indicated by the xrandr line, it’s 30 Hz. Which is what you could expect over HDMI 1.4. Sadly, I couldn’t get that resolution to run with my Sandy Bridge notebook. :(

    – Daniel B
    Aug 16 '15 at 10:13














9












9








9


4






I have a DELL E7450 laptop connected via an HDMI cable to a DELL UP3214Q monitor (which can display 3840x2160 @ 60Hz with a DP1.2 cable) . Ubuntu 14.10 uses the 3840 X 2160 resolution just fine - although @ 30Hz (which I don't mind). No drivers required. xrandr shows:



HDMI1 connected 3840x2160+1920+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 392mm
3840x2160 30.0*+ 25.0 24.0 30.0 24.0
1920x1200 60.0


Ubuntu 4K



But Windows 7 64-bit only sees 1920x1080 as the maximum resolution. The Intel HD Graphics 5500 settings allow for custom resolutions, but the maximum I could set was 2560 x 1440 @ 30Hz. Beyond that, everything would error with




The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity




This error is obviously completely bogus!



Also, I accidentally managed to get 3840x2160 @ 30Hz as a regular resolution in Control Panel after I booted back from Ubuntu into Windows once. This trick didn't work after rebooting windows once again to install some updated. I hadn't installed anything else in Windows, or changed any settings. Before booting into Ubuntu, I had rebooted Windows several times, so I'd rule out rebooting itself as a solution. Could Ubuntu have written some information to the graphics card or the monitor?



Other things I've tried - nothing worked:




  • Installed the Dell Display Manager: it can't do anything about resolutions

  • Installed Entec PowerStrip. It detects the maximum resolution but can't set it, even after adding it from Custom Resolution.
    enter image description here

  • tried to install Intel's native HD Graphics driver, but is says "The driver being installed is not validated for this computer. Please obtain the appropriate driver from the computer manufacturer."

  • updated Dell's Intel HD video driver

  • I've already installed the monitor driver and the monitor shows correctly by name in Device Manager. Still, no native resolution shows up anywhere.


  • Custom Resolution Utility allegedly doesn't work on Intel graphics cards. I've run, and it gave no error about the graphics card being Intel. It flickered the monitor and ultimately reset it 1920x1080, but didn't help at all with 4K.


  • Display Changer - seems to just pick up whatever resolutions are in the Registry

  • disconnect the laptop's internal display, and only "connect to projector"


There's an Intel Community thread on the buggy "The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity", but the Intel rep there isn't listening.



This is a nearly $2000 4K monitor that doesn't display 4K in Windows 7.



What else can I try?










share|improve this question
















I have a DELL E7450 laptop connected via an HDMI cable to a DELL UP3214Q monitor (which can display 3840x2160 @ 60Hz with a DP1.2 cable) . Ubuntu 14.10 uses the 3840 X 2160 resolution just fine - although @ 30Hz (which I don't mind). No drivers required. xrandr shows:



HDMI1 connected 3840x2160+1920+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 392mm
3840x2160 30.0*+ 25.0 24.0 30.0 24.0
1920x1200 60.0


Ubuntu 4K



But Windows 7 64-bit only sees 1920x1080 as the maximum resolution. The Intel HD Graphics 5500 settings allow for custom resolutions, but the maximum I could set was 2560 x 1440 @ 30Hz. Beyond that, everything would error with




The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity




This error is obviously completely bogus!



Also, I accidentally managed to get 3840x2160 @ 30Hz as a regular resolution in Control Panel after I booted back from Ubuntu into Windows once. This trick didn't work after rebooting windows once again to install some updated. I hadn't installed anything else in Windows, or changed any settings. Before booting into Ubuntu, I had rebooted Windows several times, so I'd rule out rebooting itself as a solution. Could Ubuntu have written some information to the graphics card or the monitor?



Other things I've tried - nothing worked:




  • Installed the Dell Display Manager: it can't do anything about resolutions

  • Installed Entec PowerStrip. It detects the maximum resolution but can't set it, even after adding it from Custom Resolution.
    enter image description here

  • tried to install Intel's native HD Graphics driver, but is says "The driver being installed is not validated for this computer. Please obtain the appropriate driver from the computer manufacturer."

  • updated Dell's Intel HD video driver

  • I've already installed the monitor driver and the monitor shows correctly by name in Device Manager. Still, no native resolution shows up anywhere.


  • Custom Resolution Utility allegedly doesn't work on Intel graphics cards. I've run, and it gave no error about the graphics card being Intel. It flickered the monitor and ultimately reset it 1920x1080, but didn't help at all with 4K.


  • Display Changer - seems to just pick up whatever resolutions are in the Registry

  • disconnect the laptop's internal display, and only "connect to projector"


There's an Intel Community thread on the buggy "The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity", but the Intel rep there isn't listening.



This is a nearly $2000 4K monitor that doesn't display 4K in Windows 7.



What else can I try?







windows-7 resolution 4k-resolution






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 25 '15 at 17:10







Dan Dascalescu

















asked Aug 14 '15 at 16:15









Dan DascalescuDan Dascalescu

2,42842947




2,42842947













  • This says maximum resolution is HDMI: 4096 x 2304, 3840 x 2160 @ 24 Hz / 24bpp. Not sure why it would be different in Ubuntu. Was the 60Hz actually there?

    – MC10
    Aug 14 '15 at 16:25











  • @MC10: actually I didn't explicitly see 60Hz (added a screenshot), but never saw anything slower than I'm used to. By comparison, the 30Hz custom resolution in Windows was just bad - even the mouse moved visibly more slowly.

    – Dan Dascalescu
    Aug 14 '15 at 16:56













  • @BalaSivakumar: what do you mean? On the exact same hardware combination, Ubuntu handles the resolution just fine. I simply want the same in Windows.

    – Dan Dascalescu
    Aug 14 '15 at 17:05











  • Hmm that's weird. I wonder if there's some limitation of Windows that Ubuntu does not have. What does xrandr output for the Ubuntu? It should show a Hz value.

    – MC10
    Aug 14 '15 at 17:41











  • @MC10 As indicated by the xrandr line, it’s 30 Hz. Which is what you could expect over HDMI 1.4. Sadly, I couldn’t get that resolution to run with my Sandy Bridge notebook. :(

    – Daniel B
    Aug 16 '15 at 10:13



















  • This says maximum resolution is HDMI: 4096 x 2304, 3840 x 2160 @ 24 Hz / 24bpp. Not sure why it would be different in Ubuntu. Was the 60Hz actually there?

    – MC10
    Aug 14 '15 at 16:25











  • @MC10: actually I didn't explicitly see 60Hz (added a screenshot), but never saw anything slower than I'm used to. By comparison, the 30Hz custom resolution in Windows was just bad - even the mouse moved visibly more slowly.

    – Dan Dascalescu
    Aug 14 '15 at 16:56













  • @BalaSivakumar: what do you mean? On the exact same hardware combination, Ubuntu handles the resolution just fine. I simply want the same in Windows.

    – Dan Dascalescu
    Aug 14 '15 at 17:05











  • Hmm that's weird. I wonder if there's some limitation of Windows that Ubuntu does not have. What does xrandr output for the Ubuntu? It should show a Hz value.

    – MC10
    Aug 14 '15 at 17:41











  • @MC10 As indicated by the xrandr line, it’s 30 Hz. Which is what you could expect over HDMI 1.4. Sadly, I couldn’t get that resolution to run with my Sandy Bridge notebook. :(

    – Daniel B
    Aug 16 '15 at 10:13

















This says maximum resolution is HDMI: 4096 x 2304, 3840 x 2160 @ 24 Hz / 24bpp. Not sure why it would be different in Ubuntu. Was the 60Hz actually there?

– MC10
Aug 14 '15 at 16:25





This says maximum resolution is HDMI: 4096 x 2304, 3840 x 2160 @ 24 Hz / 24bpp. Not sure why it would be different in Ubuntu. Was the 60Hz actually there?

– MC10
Aug 14 '15 at 16:25













@MC10: actually I didn't explicitly see 60Hz (added a screenshot), but never saw anything slower than I'm used to. By comparison, the 30Hz custom resolution in Windows was just bad - even the mouse moved visibly more slowly.

– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 14 '15 at 16:56







@MC10: actually I didn't explicitly see 60Hz (added a screenshot), but never saw anything slower than I'm used to. By comparison, the 30Hz custom resolution in Windows was just bad - even the mouse moved visibly more slowly.

– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 14 '15 at 16:56















@BalaSivakumar: what do you mean? On the exact same hardware combination, Ubuntu handles the resolution just fine. I simply want the same in Windows.

– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 14 '15 at 17:05





@BalaSivakumar: what do you mean? On the exact same hardware combination, Ubuntu handles the resolution just fine. I simply want the same in Windows.

– Dan Dascalescu
Aug 14 '15 at 17:05













Hmm that's weird. I wonder if there's some limitation of Windows that Ubuntu does not have. What does xrandr output for the Ubuntu? It should show a Hz value.

– MC10
Aug 14 '15 at 17:41





Hmm that's weird. I wonder if there's some limitation of Windows that Ubuntu does not have. What does xrandr output for the Ubuntu? It should show a Hz value.

– MC10
Aug 14 '15 at 17:41













@MC10 As indicated by the xrandr line, it’s 30 Hz. Which is what you could expect over HDMI 1.4. Sadly, I couldn’t get that resolution to run with my Sandy Bridge notebook. :(

– Daniel B
Aug 16 '15 at 10:13





@MC10 As indicated by the xrandr line, it’s 30 Hz. Which is what you could expect over HDMI 1.4. Sadly, I couldn’t get that resolution to run with my Sandy Bridge notebook. :(

– Daniel B
Aug 16 '15 at 10:13










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














The only thing that has worked so far was buying a Mini-DisplayPort to DisplayPort 1.2 cable. 3840x2160 @ 60Hz works great now.



It's disappointing that the Intel folks refuse to acknowledge the "maximum bandwidth exceeded" bug.






share|improve this answer


























  • @fixer1234: I'm so incredibly frustrated by this.

    – Dan Dascalescu
    Aug 25 '15 at 15:53











  • "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger." :-)

    – fixer1234
    Aug 27 '15 at 21:45











  • @DanDascalescu - Im not sure if this is one of the speed breakers but both DP & HDMI standards for 4K is kind of in flux these days - video cards, cables etc. Maybe that HDMI cable has limitations and is not compliant to the higher than 1080p spec or querying Display via it had issues . And maybe Ubuntu bypasses the querying. lots of such stuff on overclock.net forums

    – Alex S
    Aug 27 '15 at 22:25



















0














The Intel HD Graphics 4000 drivers for Windows allow the creation of custom resolutions. (I know, why on earth would it not recognize the 4k standard like Linux does!?)
Anyhow, on this dialog box create a 3840 x 2160 pixel resolution at 24Hz AND(!!) Select CVT-RB as the Timing Standard.
It should ask you to confirm, then close that app. Next time you plug in the monitor (it does have to be rediscovered by Windows) and open up the Windows Display Settings dialog box, pick the 4k monitor, in resolution, you will have the option to pick 3840x2160 - it should even have the tag 'Recommended'.






share|improve this answer
























  • You seem to be saying what to do but not how to do it. How does one create a custom resolution? (Also, the OP has already tried custom resolutions without success.)

    – Scott
    Sep 30 '18 at 18:11











  • the OP did do a custom resolution - and set it to 30Hz. I am informing that the correct setting is 24Hz, and to tweak the timing standard to CVT-RB.

    – Mark van der Pol
    Nov 29 '18 at 23:30



















-2














Intel HD Graphics 4000 can handle 4K @ 30p Hz with this steps and special Monitor




  • Mac Mini Late 2012 with "Intel HD Graphics 4000"

  • Boot Camp Installation of Windows 7

  • Install Intel HD Graphics 4000 Drivers version 9.17.10.3347 (Legacy)
    find this inside Boot Camp @ support.apple.com/kb/DL1720?locale=en_US
    Path: BootCampDriversIntelBootCamp5.1.5621.zipBootCampDrivers


  • Samsung Monitor 4K U28E590
    This the the trick! This monitor have Picture in Picture Option.


  • From the windows Bar Open Intel Graphics Properties


  • Advanced Mode

  • Display --> Custom Resolutions

  • Width=1920, Height=2160, Color Depth=All Colors,
    Refresh Rate=30, Timing Standard=CVT-RB ---> Add

  • Restart your Computer.


  • Connect both cables Mini-Port--> HDMI, and HDMI-->HDMI to this monitor


  • On the monitor turn on Picture in picture and split in two the screen

  • On Windows, Rich click on the Desktop --> Screen resolutions and arrange
    both displays like this image


Hope this helps



Now I need to figure it out how to do this on OS X El Capitan, cause I know tha is a fact that this Video Card is fully capable of 4K with this Monitor :)






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "3"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f957222%2fenable-4k-3840-x-2160-resolution-on-windows-7-with-intel-hd-graphics-card%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    The only thing that has worked so far was buying a Mini-DisplayPort to DisplayPort 1.2 cable. 3840x2160 @ 60Hz works great now.



    It's disappointing that the Intel folks refuse to acknowledge the "maximum bandwidth exceeded" bug.






    share|improve this answer


























    • @fixer1234: I'm so incredibly frustrated by this.

      – Dan Dascalescu
      Aug 25 '15 at 15:53











    • "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger." :-)

      – fixer1234
      Aug 27 '15 at 21:45











    • @DanDascalescu - Im not sure if this is one of the speed breakers but both DP & HDMI standards for 4K is kind of in flux these days - video cards, cables etc. Maybe that HDMI cable has limitations and is not compliant to the higher than 1080p spec or querying Display via it had issues . And maybe Ubuntu bypasses the querying. lots of such stuff on overclock.net forums

      – Alex S
      Aug 27 '15 at 22:25
















    2














    The only thing that has worked so far was buying a Mini-DisplayPort to DisplayPort 1.2 cable. 3840x2160 @ 60Hz works great now.



    It's disappointing that the Intel folks refuse to acknowledge the "maximum bandwidth exceeded" bug.






    share|improve this answer


























    • @fixer1234: I'm so incredibly frustrated by this.

      – Dan Dascalescu
      Aug 25 '15 at 15:53











    • "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger." :-)

      – fixer1234
      Aug 27 '15 at 21:45











    • @DanDascalescu - Im not sure if this is one of the speed breakers but both DP & HDMI standards for 4K is kind of in flux these days - video cards, cables etc. Maybe that HDMI cable has limitations and is not compliant to the higher than 1080p spec or querying Display via it had issues . And maybe Ubuntu bypasses the querying. lots of such stuff on overclock.net forums

      – Alex S
      Aug 27 '15 at 22:25














    2












    2








    2







    The only thing that has worked so far was buying a Mini-DisplayPort to DisplayPort 1.2 cable. 3840x2160 @ 60Hz works great now.



    It's disappointing that the Intel folks refuse to acknowledge the "maximum bandwidth exceeded" bug.






    share|improve this answer















    The only thing that has worked so far was buying a Mini-DisplayPort to DisplayPort 1.2 cable. 3840x2160 @ 60Hz works great now.



    It's disappointing that the Intel folks refuse to acknowledge the "maximum bandwidth exceeded" bug.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Aug 27 '15 at 21:31

























    answered Aug 16 '15 at 10:06









    Dan DascalescuDan Dascalescu

    2,42842947




    2,42842947













    • @fixer1234: I'm so incredibly frustrated by this.

      – Dan Dascalescu
      Aug 25 '15 at 15:53











    • "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger." :-)

      – fixer1234
      Aug 27 '15 at 21:45











    • @DanDascalescu - Im not sure if this is one of the speed breakers but both DP & HDMI standards for 4K is kind of in flux these days - video cards, cables etc. Maybe that HDMI cable has limitations and is not compliant to the higher than 1080p spec or querying Display via it had issues . And maybe Ubuntu bypasses the querying. lots of such stuff on overclock.net forums

      – Alex S
      Aug 27 '15 at 22:25



















    • @fixer1234: I'm so incredibly frustrated by this.

      – Dan Dascalescu
      Aug 25 '15 at 15:53











    • "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger." :-)

      – fixer1234
      Aug 27 '15 at 21:45











    • @DanDascalescu - Im not sure if this is one of the speed breakers but both DP & HDMI standards for 4K is kind of in flux these days - video cards, cables etc. Maybe that HDMI cable has limitations and is not compliant to the higher than 1080p spec or querying Display via it had issues . And maybe Ubuntu bypasses the querying. lots of such stuff on overclock.net forums

      – Alex S
      Aug 27 '15 at 22:25

















    @fixer1234: I'm so incredibly frustrated by this.

    – Dan Dascalescu
    Aug 25 '15 at 15:53





    @fixer1234: I'm so incredibly frustrated by this.

    – Dan Dascalescu
    Aug 25 '15 at 15:53













    "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger." :-)

    – fixer1234
    Aug 27 '15 at 21:45





    "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger." :-)

    – fixer1234
    Aug 27 '15 at 21:45













    @DanDascalescu - Im not sure if this is one of the speed breakers but both DP & HDMI standards for 4K is kind of in flux these days - video cards, cables etc. Maybe that HDMI cable has limitations and is not compliant to the higher than 1080p spec or querying Display via it had issues . And maybe Ubuntu bypasses the querying. lots of such stuff on overclock.net forums

    – Alex S
    Aug 27 '15 at 22:25





    @DanDascalescu - Im not sure if this is one of the speed breakers but both DP & HDMI standards for 4K is kind of in flux these days - video cards, cables etc. Maybe that HDMI cable has limitations and is not compliant to the higher than 1080p spec or querying Display via it had issues . And maybe Ubuntu bypasses the querying. lots of such stuff on overclock.net forums

    – Alex S
    Aug 27 '15 at 22:25













    0














    The Intel HD Graphics 4000 drivers for Windows allow the creation of custom resolutions. (I know, why on earth would it not recognize the 4k standard like Linux does!?)
    Anyhow, on this dialog box create a 3840 x 2160 pixel resolution at 24Hz AND(!!) Select CVT-RB as the Timing Standard.
    It should ask you to confirm, then close that app. Next time you plug in the monitor (it does have to be rediscovered by Windows) and open up the Windows Display Settings dialog box, pick the 4k monitor, in resolution, you will have the option to pick 3840x2160 - it should even have the tag 'Recommended'.






    share|improve this answer
























    • You seem to be saying what to do but not how to do it. How does one create a custom resolution? (Also, the OP has already tried custom resolutions without success.)

      – Scott
      Sep 30 '18 at 18:11











    • the OP did do a custom resolution - and set it to 30Hz. I am informing that the correct setting is 24Hz, and to tweak the timing standard to CVT-RB.

      – Mark van der Pol
      Nov 29 '18 at 23:30
















    0














    The Intel HD Graphics 4000 drivers for Windows allow the creation of custom resolutions. (I know, why on earth would it not recognize the 4k standard like Linux does!?)
    Anyhow, on this dialog box create a 3840 x 2160 pixel resolution at 24Hz AND(!!) Select CVT-RB as the Timing Standard.
    It should ask you to confirm, then close that app. Next time you plug in the monitor (it does have to be rediscovered by Windows) and open up the Windows Display Settings dialog box, pick the 4k monitor, in resolution, you will have the option to pick 3840x2160 - it should even have the tag 'Recommended'.






    share|improve this answer
























    • You seem to be saying what to do but not how to do it. How does one create a custom resolution? (Also, the OP has already tried custom resolutions without success.)

      – Scott
      Sep 30 '18 at 18:11











    • the OP did do a custom resolution - and set it to 30Hz. I am informing that the correct setting is 24Hz, and to tweak the timing standard to CVT-RB.

      – Mark van der Pol
      Nov 29 '18 at 23:30














    0












    0








    0







    The Intel HD Graphics 4000 drivers for Windows allow the creation of custom resolutions. (I know, why on earth would it not recognize the 4k standard like Linux does!?)
    Anyhow, on this dialog box create a 3840 x 2160 pixel resolution at 24Hz AND(!!) Select CVT-RB as the Timing Standard.
    It should ask you to confirm, then close that app. Next time you plug in the monitor (it does have to be rediscovered by Windows) and open up the Windows Display Settings dialog box, pick the 4k monitor, in resolution, you will have the option to pick 3840x2160 - it should even have the tag 'Recommended'.






    share|improve this answer













    The Intel HD Graphics 4000 drivers for Windows allow the creation of custom resolutions. (I know, why on earth would it not recognize the 4k standard like Linux does!?)
    Anyhow, on this dialog box create a 3840 x 2160 pixel resolution at 24Hz AND(!!) Select CVT-RB as the Timing Standard.
    It should ask you to confirm, then close that app. Next time you plug in the monitor (it does have to be rediscovered by Windows) and open up the Windows Display Settings dialog box, pick the 4k monitor, in resolution, you will have the option to pick 3840x2160 - it should even have the tag 'Recommended'.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Sep 30 '18 at 17:48









    Mark van der PolMark van der Pol

    1




    1













    • You seem to be saying what to do but not how to do it. How does one create a custom resolution? (Also, the OP has already tried custom resolutions without success.)

      – Scott
      Sep 30 '18 at 18:11











    • the OP did do a custom resolution - and set it to 30Hz. I am informing that the correct setting is 24Hz, and to tweak the timing standard to CVT-RB.

      – Mark van der Pol
      Nov 29 '18 at 23:30



















    • You seem to be saying what to do but not how to do it. How does one create a custom resolution? (Also, the OP has already tried custom resolutions without success.)

      – Scott
      Sep 30 '18 at 18:11











    • the OP did do a custom resolution - and set it to 30Hz. I am informing that the correct setting is 24Hz, and to tweak the timing standard to CVT-RB.

      – Mark van der Pol
      Nov 29 '18 at 23:30

















    You seem to be saying what to do but not how to do it. How does one create a custom resolution? (Also, the OP has already tried custom resolutions without success.)

    – Scott
    Sep 30 '18 at 18:11





    You seem to be saying what to do but not how to do it. How does one create a custom resolution? (Also, the OP has already tried custom resolutions without success.)

    – Scott
    Sep 30 '18 at 18:11













    the OP did do a custom resolution - and set it to 30Hz. I am informing that the correct setting is 24Hz, and to tweak the timing standard to CVT-RB.

    – Mark van der Pol
    Nov 29 '18 at 23:30





    the OP did do a custom resolution - and set it to 30Hz. I am informing that the correct setting is 24Hz, and to tweak the timing standard to CVT-RB.

    – Mark van der Pol
    Nov 29 '18 at 23:30











    -2














    Intel HD Graphics 4000 can handle 4K @ 30p Hz with this steps and special Monitor




    • Mac Mini Late 2012 with "Intel HD Graphics 4000"

    • Boot Camp Installation of Windows 7

    • Install Intel HD Graphics 4000 Drivers version 9.17.10.3347 (Legacy)
      find this inside Boot Camp @ support.apple.com/kb/DL1720?locale=en_US
      Path: BootCampDriversIntelBootCamp5.1.5621.zipBootCampDrivers


    • Samsung Monitor 4K U28E590
      This the the trick! This monitor have Picture in Picture Option.


    • From the windows Bar Open Intel Graphics Properties


    • Advanced Mode

    • Display --> Custom Resolutions

    • Width=1920, Height=2160, Color Depth=All Colors,
      Refresh Rate=30, Timing Standard=CVT-RB ---> Add

    • Restart your Computer.


    • Connect both cables Mini-Port--> HDMI, and HDMI-->HDMI to this monitor


    • On the monitor turn on Picture in picture and split in two the screen

    • On Windows, Rich click on the Desktop --> Screen resolutions and arrange
      both displays like this image


    Hope this helps



    Now I need to figure it out how to do this on OS X El Capitan, cause I know tha is a fact that this Video Card is fully capable of 4K with this Monitor :)






    share|improve this answer




























      -2














      Intel HD Graphics 4000 can handle 4K @ 30p Hz with this steps and special Monitor




      • Mac Mini Late 2012 with "Intel HD Graphics 4000"

      • Boot Camp Installation of Windows 7

      • Install Intel HD Graphics 4000 Drivers version 9.17.10.3347 (Legacy)
        find this inside Boot Camp @ support.apple.com/kb/DL1720?locale=en_US
        Path: BootCampDriversIntelBootCamp5.1.5621.zipBootCampDrivers


      • Samsung Monitor 4K U28E590
        This the the trick! This monitor have Picture in Picture Option.


      • From the windows Bar Open Intel Graphics Properties


      • Advanced Mode

      • Display --> Custom Resolutions

      • Width=1920, Height=2160, Color Depth=All Colors,
        Refresh Rate=30, Timing Standard=CVT-RB ---> Add

      • Restart your Computer.


      • Connect both cables Mini-Port--> HDMI, and HDMI-->HDMI to this monitor


      • On the monitor turn on Picture in picture and split in two the screen

      • On Windows, Rich click on the Desktop --> Screen resolutions and arrange
        both displays like this image


      Hope this helps



      Now I need to figure it out how to do this on OS X El Capitan, cause I know tha is a fact that this Video Card is fully capable of 4K with this Monitor :)






      share|improve this answer


























        -2












        -2








        -2







        Intel HD Graphics 4000 can handle 4K @ 30p Hz with this steps and special Monitor




        • Mac Mini Late 2012 with "Intel HD Graphics 4000"

        • Boot Camp Installation of Windows 7

        • Install Intel HD Graphics 4000 Drivers version 9.17.10.3347 (Legacy)
          find this inside Boot Camp @ support.apple.com/kb/DL1720?locale=en_US
          Path: BootCampDriversIntelBootCamp5.1.5621.zipBootCampDrivers


        • Samsung Monitor 4K U28E590
          This the the trick! This monitor have Picture in Picture Option.


        • From the windows Bar Open Intel Graphics Properties


        • Advanced Mode

        • Display --> Custom Resolutions

        • Width=1920, Height=2160, Color Depth=All Colors,
          Refresh Rate=30, Timing Standard=CVT-RB ---> Add

        • Restart your Computer.


        • Connect both cables Mini-Port--> HDMI, and HDMI-->HDMI to this monitor


        • On the monitor turn on Picture in picture and split in two the screen

        • On Windows, Rich click on the Desktop --> Screen resolutions and arrange
          both displays like this image


        Hope this helps



        Now I need to figure it out how to do this on OS X El Capitan, cause I know tha is a fact that this Video Card is fully capable of 4K with this Monitor :)






        share|improve this answer













        Intel HD Graphics 4000 can handle 4K @ 30p Hz with this steps and special Monitor




        • Mac Mini Late 2012 with "Intel HD Graphics 4000"

        • Boot Camp Installation of Windows 7

        • Install Intel HD Graphics 4000 Drivers version 9.17.10.3347 (Legacy)
          find this inside Boot Camp @ support.apple.com/kb/DL1720?locale=en_US
          Path: BootCampDriversIntelBootCamp5.1.5621.zipBootCampDrivers


        • Samsung Monitor 4K U28E590
          This the the trick! This monitor have Picture in Picture Option.


        • From the windows Bar Open Intel Graphics Properties


        • Advanced Mode

        • Display --> Custom Resolutions

        • Width=1920, Height=2160, Color Depth=All Colors,
          Refresh Rate=30, Timing Standard=CVT-RB ---> Add

        • Restart your Computer.


        • Connect both cables Mini-Port--> HDMI, and HDMI-->HDMI to this monitor


        • On the monitor turn on Picture in picture and split in two the screen

        • On Windows, Rich click on the Desktop --> Screen resolutions and arrange
          both displays like this image


        Hope this helps



        Now I need to figure it out how to do this on OS X El Capitan, cause I know tha is a fact that this Video Card is fully capable of 4K with this Monitor :)







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 15 '16 at 17:33









        Alejandro GarciaAlejandro Garcia

        1




        1






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f957222%2fenable-4k-3840-x-2160-resolution-on-windows-7-with-intel-hd-graphics-card%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll? Announcing the arrival of...

            Couldn't open a raw socket. Error: Permission denied (13) (nmap)Is it possible to run networking commands...

            VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...