What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator? ...

Will the Antimagic Field spell cause elementals not summoned by magic to dissipate?

Weaponising the Grasp-at-a-Distance spell

A German immigrant ancestor has a "Registration Affidavit of Alien Enemy" on file. What does that mean exactly?

Is there a verb for listening stealthily?

Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?

Help Recreating a Table

Why did Bronn offer to be Tyrion Lannister's champion in trial by combat?

What is the difference between 准时 and 按时?

Does traveling In The United States require a passport or can I use my green card if not a US citizen?

Why does my GNOME settings mention "Moto C Plus"?

Why aren't these two solutions equivalent? Combinatorics problem

Does using the Inspiration rules for character defects encourage My Guy Syndrome?

What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?

Why does BitLocker not use RSA?

Is my guitar’s action too high?

Who's this lady in the war room?

Can this water damage be explained by lack of gutters and grading issues?

What kind of equipment or other technology is necessary to photograph sprites (atmospheric phenomenon)

Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions

Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?

What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management

Coin Game with infinite paradox

What came first? Venom as the movie or as the song?

Are Flameskulls resistant to magical piercing damage?



What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Dependency Injection/IoC container practices when writing frameworksHow to use Dependency Injection in conjunction with the Factory patternDependency injection and ease of useFor DI, where to create dependencies (new objects) specifically within framework code?Gradually move codebase to dependency injection containerAmbient dependency injection through static service locatorDependencyInjection - Constructor over-injection smell vs service locator - where is the proper approach?Service locator vs Dependency Injection?IoC configurations - one file/assembly in solution or one file per executing assembly?Handling disposables with dependency injection





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







16















I understand that directly instantiating dependencies inside a class is considered bad practise. This makes sense as doing so tightly couples everything which in turn makes testing very hard.



Almost all the frameworks I've come across seem to favour dependency injection with a container over using service locators. Both of them seem to achieve the same thing by allowing the programmer to specify what object should be returned when a class requires a dependency.



What's the difference between the two? Why would I choose one over the other?










share|improve this question







New contributor




tom6025222 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



























    16















    I understand that directly instantiating dependencies inside a class is considered bad practise. This makes sense as doing so tightly couples everything which in turn makes testing very hard.



    Almost all the frameworks I've come across seem to favour dependency injection with a container over using service locators. Both of them seem to achieve the same thing by allowing the programmer to specify what object should be returned when a class requires a dependency.



    What's the difference between the two? Why would I choose one over the other?










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    tom6025222 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      16












      16








      16


      2






      I understand that directly instantiating dependencies inside a class is considered bad practise. This makes sense as doing so tightly couples everything which in turn makes testing very hard.



      Almost all the frameworks I've come across seem to favour dependency injection with a container over using service locators. Both of them seem to achieve the same thing by allowing the programmer to specify what object should be returned when a class requires a dependency.



      What's the difference between the two? Why would I choose one over the other?










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      tom6025222 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I understand that directly instantiating dependencies inside a class is considered bad practise. This makes sense as doing so tightly couples everything which in turn makes testing very hard.



      Almost all the frameworks I've come across seem to favour dependency injection with a container over using service locators. Both of them seem to achieve the same thing by allowing the programmer to specify what object should be returned when a class requires a dependency.



      What's the difference between the two? Why would I choose one over the other?







      dependency-injection ioc-containers service-locator






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      tom6025222 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      tom6025222 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      tom6025222 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 9 hours ago









      tom6025222tom6025222

      892




      892




      New contributor




      tom6025222 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      tom6025222 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      tom6025222 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          22














          (This is actually a pretty good question.)



          When the object itself is responsible for requesting its dependencies, as opposed to accepting them through a constructor, it's hiding some essential information. It's only mildly better than the very tightly-coupled case of using new to instantiate its dependencies. It reduces coupling because you can in fact change the dependencies it gets, but it still has a dependency it can't shake: the service locator. That becomes the thing that everything is dependent on.



          A container that supplies dependencies through constructor arguments gives the most clarity. We see right up front that an object needs both an AccountRepository, and a PasswordStrengthEvaluator. When using a service locator, that information is less immediately apparent. You'd see right away a case where an object has, oh, 17 dependencies, and say to yourself, "Hmm, that seems like a lot. What's going on in there?" Calls to a service locator can be spread around the various methods, and hide behind conditional logic, and you might not realize you have created a "God class" -- one that does everything. Maybe that class could be refactored into 3 smaller classes that are more focused, and hence more testable.



          Now consider testing. If an object uses a service locator to get its dependencies, your test framework will also need a service locator. In a test, you'll configure the service locator to supply the the dependencies to the object under test -- maybe a FakeAccountRepository and a VeryForgivingPasswordStrengthEvaluator, and then run the test. But that's more work than specifying dependencies in the object's constructor. And your test framework also becomes dependent on the service locator. It's another thing you have to configure in every test, which makes writing tests less attractive.



          Look up "Serivce Locator is an Anti-Pattern" for Mark Seeman's article about it. If you're in the .Net world, get his book. It's very good.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Reading the question I thought about Adaptive Code via C# by Gary McLean Hall, which aligns pretty well with this answer. It has some good analogies like the service locator being the key to a safe; when handed to a class, it may create dependencies at will that might not be easy to spot.

            – Dennis
            21 mins ago



















          5














          Imagine you are a worker in a factory that makes shoes.



          You are responsible for assembling the shoes and so you'll need a lot of things in order to do that.




          • Leather

          • Measuring tape

          • Glue

          • Nails

          • Hammer

          • Scissors

          • Shoe laces


          And so on.



          You're at work in the factory and you're ready to start. You have list of instructions on how to proceed, but you don't have any of the materials or tools yet.



          A Service Locator is like a Foreman that can help you get what you need.



          You ask the Service Locator every time you need something, and they go off to find it for you. The Service Locator has been told ahead of time about what you're likely to ask for and how to find it.



          You'd better hope that you don't ask for something unexpected though. If the Locator hasn't been informed ahead of time about a particular tool or material, they won't be able to get it for you, and they will just shrug at you.



          service locator



          A Dependency Injection (DI) Container is like a big box that gets filled with everything that everyone needs at the start of the day.



          As the factory starts up, the Big Boss known as the Composition Root grabs the container and hands out everything to the Line Managers.



          The Line Managers now have what they need to conduct their duties for the day. They take what they have and pass what is needed to their subordinates.



          This process continues, with dependencies trickling down the line of production. Eventually a container of materials and tools shows up for your Foreman.



          Your Foreman now distributes exactly what you need to you and other workers, without you even asking for them.



          Basically, as soon as you show up for work, everything you need is already there in a box waiting for you. You didn't need to know anything about how to get them.



          dependency injection container






          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "131"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            tom6025222 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsoftwareengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f390755%2fwhats-the-difference-between-using-dependency-injection-with-a-container-and-us%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            22














            (This is actually a pretty good question.)



            When the object itself is responsible for requesting its dependencies, as opposed to accepting them through a constructor, it's hiding some essential information. It's only mildly better than the very tightly-coupled case of using new to instantiate its dependencies. It reduces coupling because you can in fact change the dependencies it gets, but it still has a dependency it can't shake: the service locator. That becomes the thing that everything is dependent on.



            A container that supplies dependencies through constructor arguments gives the most clarity. We see right up front that an object needs both an AccountRepository, and a PasswordStrengthEvaluator. When using a service locator, that information is less immediately apparent. You'd see right away a case where an object has, oh, 17 dependencies, and say to yourself, "Hmm, that seems like a lot. What's going on in there?" Calls to a service locator can be spread around the various methods, and hide behind conditional logic, and you might not realize you have created a "God class" -- one that does everything. Maybe that class could be refactored into 3 smaller classes that are more focused, and hence more testable.



            Now consider testing. If an object uses a service locator to get its dependencies, your test framework will also need a service locator. In a test, you'll configure the service locator to supply the the dependencies to the object under test -- maybe a FakeAccountRepository and a VeryForgivingPasswordStrengthEvaluator, and then run the test. But that's more work than specifying dependencies in the object's constructor. And your test framework also becomes dependent on the service locator. It's another thing you have to configure in every test, which makes writing tests less attractive.



            Look up "Serivce Locator is an Anti-Pattern" for Mark Seeman's article about it. If you're in the .Net world, get his book. It's very good.






            share|improve this answer


























            • Reading the question I thought about Adaptive Code via C# by Gary McLean Hall, which aligns pretty well with this answer. It has some good analogies like the service locator being the key to a safe; when handed to a class, it may create dependencies at will that might not be easy to spot.

              – Dennis
              21 mins ago
















            22














            (This is actually a pretty good question.)



            When the object itself is responsible for requesting its dependencies, as opposed to accepting them through a constructor, it's hiding some essential information. It's only mildly better than the very tightly-coupled case of using new to instantiate its dependencies. It reduces coupling because you can in fact change the dependencies it gets, but it still has a dependency it can't shake: the service locator. That becomes the thing that everything is dependent on.



            A container that supplies dependencies through constructor arguments gives the most clarity. We see right up front that an object needs both an AccountRepository, and a PasswordStrengthEvaluator. When using a service locator, that information is less immediately apparent. You'd see right away a case where an object has, oh, 17 dependencies, and say to yourself, "Hmm, that seems like a lot. What's going on in there?" Calls to a service locator can be spread around the various methods, and hide behind conditional logic, and you might not realize you have created a "God class" -- one that does everything. Maybe that class could be refactored into 3 smaller classes that are more focused, and hence more testable.



            Now consider testing. If an object uses a service locator to get its dependencies, your test framework will also need a service locator. In a test, you'll configure the service locator to supply the the dependencies to the object under test -- maybe a FakeAccountRepository and a VeryForgivingPasswordStrengthEvaluator, and then run the test. But that's more work than specifying dependencies in the object's constructor. And your test framework also becomes dependent on the service locator. It's another thing you have to configure in every test, which makes writing tests less attractive.



            Look up "Serivce Locator is an Anti-Pattern" for Mark Seeman's article about it. If you're in the .Net world, get his book. It's very good.






            share|improve this answer


























            • Reading the question I thought about Adaptive Code via C# by Gary McLean Hall, which aligns pretty well with this answer. It has some good analogies like the service locator being the key to a safe; when handed to a class, it may create dependencies at will that might not be easy to spot.

              – Dennis
              21 mins ago














            22












            22








            22







            (This is actually a pretty good question.)



            When the object itself is responsible for requesting its dependencies, as opposed to accepting them through a constructor, it's hiding some essential information. It's only mildly better than the very tightly-coupled case of using new to instantiate its dependencies. It reduces coupling because you can in fact change the dependencies it gets, but it still has a dependency it can't shake: the service locator. That becomes the thing that everything is dependent on.



            A container that supplies dependencies through constructor arguments gives the most clarity. We see right up front that an object needs both an AccountRepository, and a PasswordStrengthEvaluator. When using a service locator, that information is less immediately apparent. You'd see right away a case where an object has, oh, 17 dependencies, and say to yourself, "Hmm, that seems like a lot. What's going on in there?" Calls to a service locator can be spread around the various methods, and hide behind conditional logic, and you might not realize you have created a "God class" -- one that does everything. Maybe that class could be refactored into 3 smaller classes that are more focused, and hence more testable.



            Now consider testing. If an object uses a service locator to get its dependencies, your test framework will also need a service locator. In a test, you'll configure the service locator to supply the the dependencies to the object under test -- maybe a FakeAccountRepository and a VeryForgivingPasswordStrengthEvaluator, and then run the test. But that's more work than specifying dependencies in the object's constructor. And your test framework also becomes dependent on the service locator. It's another thing you have to configure in every test, which makes writing tests less attractive.



            Look up "Serivce Locator is an Anti-Pattern" for Mark Seeman's article about it. If you're in the .Net world, get his book. It's very good.






            share|improve this answer















            (This is actually a pretty good question.)



            When the object itself is responsible for requesting its dependencies, as opposed to accepting them through a constructor, it's hiding some essential information. It's only mildly better than the very tightly-coupled case of using new to instantiate its dependencies. It reduces coupling because you can in fact change the dependencies it gets, but it still has a dependency it can't shake: the service locator. That becomes the thing that everything is dependent on.



            A container that supplies dependencies through constructor arguments gives the most clarity. We see right up front that an object needs both an AccountRepository, and a PasswordStrengthEvaluator. When using a service locator, that information is less immediately apparent. You'd see right away a case where an object has, oh, 17 dependencies, and say to yourself, "Hmm, that seems like a lot. What's going on in there?" Calls to a service locator can be spread around the various methods, and hide behind conditional logic, and you might not realize you have created a "God class" -- one that does everything. Maybe that class could be refactored into 3 smaller classes that are more focused, and hence more testable.



            Now consider testing. If an object uses a service locator to get its dependencies, your test framework will also need a service locator. In a test, you'll configure the service locator to supply the the dependencies to the object under test -- maybe a FakeAccountRepository and a VeryForgivingPasswordStrengthEvaluator, and then run the test. But that's more work than specifying dependencies in the object's constructor. And your test framework also becomes dependent on the service locator. It's another thing you have to configure in every test, which makes writing tests less attractive.



            Look up "Serivce Locator is an Anti-Pattern" for Mark Seeman's article about it. If you're in the .Net world, get his book. It's very good.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 8 hours ago

























            answered 8 hours ago









            Carl RaymondCarl Raymond

            51525




            51525













            • Reading the question I thought about Adaptive Code via C# by Gary McLean Hall, which aligns pretty well with this answer. It has some good analogies like the service locator being the key to a safe; when handed to a class, it may create dependencies at will that might not be easy to spot.

              – Dennis
              21 mins ago



















            • Reading the question I thought about Adaptive Code via C# by Gary McLean Hall, which aligns pretty well with this answer. It has some good analogies like the service locator being the key to a safe; when handed to a class, it may create dependencies at will that might not be easy to spot.

              – Dennis
              21 mins ago

















            Reading the question I thought about Adaptive Code via C# by Gary McLean Hall, which aligns pretty well with this answer. It has some good analogies like the service locator being the key to a safe; when handed to a class, it may create dependencies at will that might not be easy to spot.

            – Dennis
            21 mins ago





            Reading the question I thought about Adaptive Code via C# by Gary McLean Hall, which aligns pretty well with this answer. It has some good analogies like the service locator being the key to a safe; when handed to a class, it may create dependencies at will that might not be easy to spot.

            – Dennis
            21 mins ago













            5














            Imagine you are a worker in a factory that makes shoes.



            You are responsible for assembling the shoes and so you'll need a lot of things in order to do that.




            • Leather

            • Measuring tape

            • Glue

            • Nails

            • Hammer

            • Scissors

            • Shoe laces


            And so on.



            You're at work in the factory and you're ready to start. You have list of instructions on how to proceed, but you don't have any of the materials or tools yet.



            A Service Locator is like a Foreman that can help you get what you need.



            You ask the Service Locator every time you need something, and they go off to find it for you. The Service Locator has been told ahead of time about what you're likely to ask for and how to find it.



            You'd better hope that you don't ask for something unexpected though. If the Locator hasn't been informed ahead of time about a particular tool or material, they won't be able to get it for you, and they will just shrug at you.



            service locator



            A Dependency Injection (DI) Container is like a big box that gets filled with everything that everyone needs at the start of the day.



            As the factory starts up, the Big Boss known as the Composition Root grabs the container and hands out everything to the Line Managers.



            The Line Managers now have what they need to conduct their duties for the day. They take what they have and pass what is needed to their subordinates.



            This process continues, with dependencies trickling down the line of production. Eventually a container of materials and tools shows up for your Foreman.



            Your Foreman now distributes exactly what you need to you and other workers, without you even asking for them.



            Basically, as soon as you show up for work, everything you need is already there in a box waiting for you. You didn't need to know anything about how to get them.



            dependency injection container






            share|improve this answer




























              5














              Imagine you are a worker in a factory that makes shoes.



              You are responsible for assembling the shoes and so you'll need a lot of things in order to do that.




              • Leather

              • Measuring tape

              • Glue

              • Nails

              • Hammer

              • Scissors

              • Shoe laces


              And so on.



              You're at work in the factory and you're ready to start. You have list of instructions on how to proceed, but you don't have any of the materials or tools yet.



              A Service Locator is like a Foreman that can help you get what you need.



              You ask the Service Locator every time you need something, and they go off to find it for you. The Service Locator has been told ahead of time about what you're likely to ask for and how to find it.



              You'd better hope that you don't ask for something unexpected though. If the Locator hasn't been informed ahead of time about a particular tool or material, they won't be able to get it for you, and they will just shrug at you.



              service locator



              A Dependency Injection (DI) Container is like a big box that gets filled with everything that everyone needs at the start of the day.



              As the factory starts up, the Big Boss known as the Composition Root grabs the container and hands out everything to the Line Managers.



              The Line Managers now have what they need to conduct their duties for the day. They take what they have and pass what is needed to their subordinates.



              This process continues, with dependencies trickling down the line of production. Eventually a container of materials and tools shows up for your Foreman.



              Your Foreman now distributes exactly what you need to you and other workers, without you even asking for them.



              Basically, as soon as you show up for work, everything you need is already there in a box waiting for you. You didn't need to know anything about how to get them.



              dependency injection container






              share|improve this answer


























                5












                5








                5







                Imagine you are a worker in a factory that makes shoes.



                You are responsible for assembling the shoes and so you'll need a lot of things in order to do that.




                • Leather

                • Measuring tape

                • Glue

                • Nails

                • Hammer

                • Scissors

                • Shoe laces


                And so on.



                You're at work in the factory and you're ready to start. You have list of instructions on how to proceed, but you don't have any of the materials or tools yet.



                A Service Locator is like a Foreman that can help you get what you need.



                You ask the Service Locator every time you need something, and they go off to find it for you. The Service Locator has been told ahead of time about what you're likely to ask for and how to find it.



                You'd better hope that you don't ask for something unexpected though. If the Locator hasn't been informed ahead of time about a particular tool or material, they won't be able to get it for you, and they will just shrug at you.



                service locator



                A Dependency Injection (DI) Container is like a big box that gets filled with everything that everyone needs at the start of the day.



                As the factory starts up, the Big Boss known as the Composition Root grabs the container and hands out everything to the Line Managers.



                The Line Managers now have what they need to conduct their duties for the day. They take what they have and pass what is needed to their subordinates.



                This process continues, with dependencies trickling down the line of production. Eventually a container of materials and tools shows up for your Foreman.



                Your Foreman now distributes exactly what you need to you and other workers, without you even asking for them.



                Basically, as soon as you show up for work, everything you need is already there in a box waiting for you. You didn't need to know anything about how to get them.



                dependency injection container






                share|improve this answer













                Imagine you are a worker in a factory that makes shoes.



                You are responsible for assembling the shoes and so you'll need a lot of things in order to do that.




                • Leather

                • Measuring tape

                • Glue

                • Nails

                • Hammer

                • Scissors

                • Shoe laces


                And so on.



                You're at work in the factory and you're ready to start. You have list of instructions on how to proceed, but you don't have any of the materials or tools yet.



                A Service Locator is like a Foreman that can help you get what you need.



                You ask the Service Locator every time you need something, and they go off to find it for you. The Service Locator has been told ahead of time about what you're likely to ask for and how to find it.



                You'd better hope that you don't ask for something unexpected though. If the Locator hasn't been informed ahead of time about a particular tool or material, they won't be able to get it for you, and they will just shrug at you.



                service locator



                A Dependency Injection (DI) Container is like a big box that gets filled with everything that everyone needs at the start of the day.



                As the factory starts up, the Big Boss known as the Composition Root grabs the container and hands out everything to the Line Managers.



                The Line Managers now have what they need to conduct their duties for the day. They take what they have and pass what is needed to their subordinates.



                This process continues, with dependencies trickling down the line of production. Eventually a container of materials and tools shows up for your Foreman.



                Your Foreman now distributes exactly what you need to you and other workers, without you even asking for them.



                Basically, as soon as you show up for work, everything you need is already there in a box waiting for you. You didn't need to know anything about how to get them.



                dependency injection container







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 3 hours ago









                Rowan FreemanRowan Freeman

                1,78631835




                1,78631835






















                    tom6025222 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    tom6025222 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    tom6025222 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    tom6025222 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Software Engineering Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsoftwareengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f390755%2fwhats-the-difference-between-using-dependency-injection-with-a-container-and-us%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...

                    Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Mirandela Referências Menu de...

                    looking for continuous Screen Capture for retroactivly reproducing errors, timeback machineRolling desktop...