Kepler's 3rd law: ratios don't fit data2019 Community Moderator Election Announcing the...
A German immigrant ancestor has a "Registration Affidavit of Alien Enemy" on file. What does that mean exactly?
Sorting the characters in a utf-16 string in java
Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?
How to mute a string and play another at the same time
Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions
"Destructive force" carried by a B-52?
Kepler's 3rd law: ratios don't fit data
When speaking, how do you change your mind mid-sentence?
What is the evidence that custom checks in Northern Ireland are going to result in violence?
A journey... into the MIND
What's the connection between Mr. Nancy and fried chicken?
How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?
Im stuck and having trouble with ￢P ∨ Q Prove: P → Q
Does Prince Arnaud cause someone holding the Princess to lose?
Raising a bilingual kid. When should we introduce the majority language?
If gravity precedes the formation of a solar system, where did the mass come from that caused the gravity?
Why these surprising proportionalities of integrals involving odd zeta values?
Does the Pact of the Blade warlock feature allow me to customize the properties of the pact weapon I create?
Like totally amazing interchangeable sister outfit accessory swapping or whatever
tabularx column has extra padding at right?
/bin/ls sorts differently than just ls
Normal Operator || T^2|| = ||T||^2
Why does BitLocker not use RSA?
Is Bran literally the world's memory?
Kepler's 3rd law: ratios don't fit data
2019 Community Moderator Election
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
2019 Moderator Election Q&A - QuestionnaireKepler's third law doesn't give earth's orbital period! Why?Only gravitation and Newton's $2^{mathrm{nd}}$ law needed to derive Kepler's laws?Newton's gravity formulas for ellipsesAngular Momentum and Kepler's Second LawCan the constant $k$ from Kepler's third law be independent of the mass of the planet?Kepler's law and my problemKepler's 3rd law applied to binary systems: How can the two orbits have different semi-major axes?Which Kepler laws might change with the Universal Gravitational Constant?Why does angular momentum being constant prove Kepler's first law?Kepler's third law is unintuitive
$begingroup$
I have been looking at satellite orbits around the earth, or any object around any planet in fact, and am trying to find the orbital radius, or semi major length of a given satellite.
Kepler's third law gives the equation $P^2 = a^3$ where $P$ is the period of orbit and $a$ the distance.
I have a table of satellites currently orbiting the earth, as well as their altitude in the sky on their geosynchronous trajectory. One in particular is 99.9 and has an altitude of 705.
By solving the equation for $a$, I get $a = (P^2)^{1/3}$.
When I plug in the numbers, they don't correspond.
So my questions are:
- Are there unit standards I need for both $P$ and $a$? Currently $P$ is in minutes, $a$ in kilometres.
- Am I missing something, like Newton's universal gravitational constant? I get a page deriving Kepler's third law using this constant.
newtonian-mechanics newtonian-gravity orbital-motion celestial-mechanics satellites
edited 10 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122001253
asked 11 hours ago
triple7triple7
183
New contributor
triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I have been looking at satellite orbits around the earth, or any object around any planet in fact, and am trying to find the orbital radius, or semi major length of a given satellite.
Kepler's third law gives the equation $P^2 = a^3$ where $P$ is the period of orbit and $a$ the distance.
I have a table of satellites currently orbiting the earth, as well as their altitude in the sky on their geosynchronous trajectory. One in particular is 99.9 and has an altitude of 705.
By solving the equation for $a$, I get $a = (P^2)^{1/3}$.
When I plug in the numbers, they don't correspond.
So my questions are:
- Are there unit standards I need for both $P$ and $a$? Currently $P$ is in minutes, $a$ in kilometres.
- Am I missing something, like Newton's universal gravitational constant? I get a page deriving Kepler's third law using this constant.
newtonian-mechanics newtonian-gravity orbital-motion celestial-mechanics satellites
edited 10 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122001253
asked 11 hours ago
triple7triple7
183
New contributor
triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kepler.html#c6
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
The equality only holds in certain units since its dimensionally inhomogeneous. In particular, if you use Earth years and the Earth-Sun distance (i.e. 1a.u.) then it's true, so it must be true in those specific units.
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
BTW, do you understand that $a$ is not altitude but rather distance from the center of the Earth?
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
No satellite orbits earth at an altitude of 705 of any commonly used unit--that's either so far out it's lost or it's deep under the surface. Kepler's third law is talking about the distance between the centers, not the distance between the surfaces.
$endgroup$
– Loren Pechtel
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
Aqua has a 95 minute orbit revolution and is at 705 km altitude above earth’s surface. I have taken into account earth’s radius...
$endgroup$
– triple7
18 mins ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I have been looking at satellite orbits around the earth, or any object around any planet in fact, and am trying to find the orbital radius, or semi major length of a given satellite.
Kepler's third law gives the equation $P^2 = a^3$ where $P$ is the period of orbit and $a$ the distance.
I have a table of satellites currently orbiting the earth, as well as their altitude in the sky on their geosynchronous trajectory. One in particular is 99.9 and has an altitude of 705.
By solving the equation for $a$, I get $a = (P^2)^{1/3}$.
When I plug in the numbers, they don't correspond.
So my questions are:
- Are there unit standards I need for both $P$ and $a$? Currently $P$ is in minutes, $a$ in kilometres.
- Am I missing something, like Newton's universal gravitational constant? I get a page deriving Kepler's third law using this constant.
newtonian-mechanics newtonian-gravity orbital-motion celestial-mechanics satellites
edited 10 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122001253
asked 11 hours ago
triple7triple7
183
New contributor
triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I have been looking at satellite orbits around the earth, or any object around any planet in fact, and am trying to find the orbital radius, or semi major length of a given satellite.
Kepler's third law gives the equation $P^2 = a^3$ where $P$ is the period of orbit and $a$ the distance.
I have a table of satellites currently orbiting the earth, as well as their altitude in the sky on their geosynchronous trajectory. One in particular is 99.9 and has an altitude of 705.
By solving the equation for $a$, I get $a = (P^2)^{1/3}$.
When I plug in the numbers, they don't correspond.
So my questions are:
- Are there unit standards I need for both $P$ and $a$? Currently $P$ is in minutes, $a$ in kilometres.
- Am I missing something, like Newton's universal gravitational constant? I get a page deriving Kepler's third law using this constant.
newtonian-mechanics newtonian-gravity orbital-motion celestial-mechanics satellites
newtonian-mechanics newtonian-gravity orbital-motion celestial-mechanics satellites
edited 10 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122001253
asked 11 hours ago
triple7triple7
183
New contributor
triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 10 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122001253
asked 11 hours ago
triple7triple7
183
New contributor
triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 10 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122001253
edited 10 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122001253
edited 10 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122001253
108k122001253
asked 11 hours ago
triple7triple7
183
New contributor
triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 11 hours ago
triple7triple7
183
asked 11 hours ago
triple7triple7
183
183
New contributor
triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kepler.html#c6
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
The equality only holds in certain units since its dimensionally inhomogeneous. In particular, if you use Earth years and the Earth-Sun distance (i.e. 1a.u.) then it's true, so it must be true in those specific units.
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
BTW, do you understand that $a$ is not altitude but rather distance from the center of the Earth?
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
No satellite orbits earth at an altitude of 705 of any commonly used unit--that's either so far out it's lost or it's deep under the surface. Kepler's third law is talking about the distance between the centers, not the distance between the surfaces.
$endgroup$
– Loren Pechtel
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
Aqua has a 95 minute orbit revolution and is at 705 km altitude above earth’s surface. I have taken into account earth’s radius...
$endgroup$
– triple7
18 mins ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kepler.html#c6
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
The equality only holds in certain units since its dimensionally inhomogeneous. In particular, if you use Earth years and the Earth-Sun distance (i.e. 1a.u.) then it's true, so it must be true in those specific units.
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
BTW, do you understand that $a$ is not altitude but rather distance from the center of the Earth?
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
No satellite orbits earth at an altitude of 705 of any commonly used unit--that's either so far out it's lost or it's deep under the surface. Kepler's third law is talking about the distance between the centers, not the distance between the surfaces.
$endgroup$
– Loren Pechtel
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
Aqua has a 95 minute orbit revolution and is at 705 km altitude above earth’s surface. I have taken into account earth’s radius...
$endgroup$
– triple7
18 mins ago
$begingroup$
hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kepler.html#c6
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kepler.html#c6
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
The equality only holds in certain units since its dimensionally inhomogeneous. In particular, if you use Earth years and the Earth-Sun distance (i.e. 1a.u.) then it's true, so it must be true in those specific units.
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The equality only holds in certain units since its dimensionally inhomogeneous. In particular, if you use Earth years and the Earth-Sun distance (i.e. 1a.u.) then it's true, so it must be true in those specific units.
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
BTW, do you understand that $a$ is not altitude but rather distance from the center of the Earth?
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
BTW, do you understand that $a$ is not altitude but rather distance from the center of the Earth?
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
No satellite orbits earth at an altitude of 705 of any commonly used unit--that's either so far out it's lost or it's deep under the surface. Kepler's third law is talking about the distance between the centers, not the distance between the surfaces.
$endgroup$
– Loren Pechtel
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
No satellite orbits earth at an altitude of 705 of any commonly used unit--that's either so far out it's lost or it's deep under the surface. Kepler's third law is talking about the distance between the centers, not the distance between the surfaces.
$endgroup$
– Loren Pechtel
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
Aqua has a 95 minute orbit revolution and is at 705 km altitude above earth’s surface. I have taken into account earth’s radius...
$endgroup$
– triple7
18 mins ago
$begingroup$
Aqua has a 95 minute orbit revolution and is at 705 km altitude above earth’s surface. I have taken into account earth’s radius...
$endgroup$
– triple7
18 mins ago
|
show 1 more comment
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
that equality should be a proportional to sign. In particular, in SI, the squared period has units of seconds squared, and the semi-major radius of of the orbit cubed is in meters cubed, so they can't be equal.
Instead, I'd be checking whether $T^{2}/a^{3}$ is constant for different satellites orbiting the same object (Like the ISS and the moon, for example)
answered 10 hours ago
Jerry SchirmerJerry Schirmer
31.7k257107
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
Ok, as I'm blind and use a screenreader, I didn't realise it was a proportion sign. And most sites only show images for formulas, which are inaccessible too. Also, I am assuming you use latec or math jacks for the symbols here, which also make the screen reader hang In a cycle. Could you give me a simple ASCII form of the distance given a period?
$endgroup$
– triple7
10 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@triple7: Keplers law says that the square of the period divided by the cube of the distance is equal to a constant for every central body. so, t squared divided by a cubed should be the same for the ISS and for the moon. After Kepler, Newton was able to come up with a theoretical formula to predict what this constant should be, which is 4 * pi squared / (G * M), where G is Newton's constant, and M is the mass of the central body.
$endgroup$
– Jerry Schirmer
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yep, finally found it. Thanks
$endgroup$
– triple7
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The general form of Kepler's period law is $T^2 = frac{4pi^2}{G(M+m)}a^3$. Often, we make the simplifying assumption that $M>>m$, so that $M+m approx M$.
Kepler's period law only takes the form $T^2 = a^3$ (forgetting about the units) when you use certain quantities- in this case, $M$ being solar mass, $T$ being an Earth year, and $a$ being an astronomical unit.
Try plugging into the equation for the mass of earth (and don't bother with the satellite mass) and use units of meters and seconds. See if you get the right result!
answered 10 hours ago
swickrotationswickrotation
715
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I used seconds and meters. R would be planet radius and satellite altitude, and the numbers seem to correspond. I needed this parameter to calculate the distance between two points by lat long alt, so i’m subtracting earth’s radius to the result of the kepler equation. I just wish math reading blind wasn’t so convoluted :/
$endgroup$
– triple7
59 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Kepler's third law claims that $p^2 propto a^3$. The equality sign you use is incorrect.
answered 10 hours ago
my2ctsmy2cts
5,9642719
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
triple7 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474399%2fkeplers-3rd-law-ratios-dont-fit-data%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
that equality should be a proportional to sign. In particular, in SI, the squared period has units of seconds squared, and the semi-major radius of of the orbit cubed is in meters cubed, so they can't be equal.
Instead, I'd be checking whether $T^{2}/a^{3}$ is constant for different satellites orbiting the same object (Like the ISS and the moon, for example)
answered 10 hours ago
Jerry SchirmerJerry Schirmer
31.7k257107
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
Ok, as I'm blind and use a screenreader, I didn't realise it was a proportion sign. And most sites only show images for formulas, which are inaccessible too. Also, I am assuming you use latec or math jacks for the symbols here, which also make the screen reader hang In a cycle. Could you give me a simple ASCII form of the distance given a period?
$endgroup$
– triple7
10 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@triple7: Keplers law says that the square of the period divided by the cube of the distance is equal to a constant for every central body. so, t squared divided by a cubed should be the same for the ISS and for the moon. After Kepler, Newton was able to come up with a theoretical formula to predict what this constant should be, which is 4 * pi squared / (G * M), where G is Newton's constant, and M is the mass of the central body.
$endgroup$
– Jerry Schirmer
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yep, finally found it. Thanks
$endgroup$
– triple7
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
that equality should be a proportional to sign. In particular, in SI, the squared period has units of seconds squared, and the semi-major radius of of the orbit cubed is in meters cubed, so they can't be equal.
Instead, I'd be checking whether $T^{2}/a^{3}$ is constant for different satellites orbiting the same object (Like the ISS and the moon, for example)
answered 10 hours ago
Jerry SchirmerJerry Schirmer
31.7k257107
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
Ok, as I'm blind and use a screenreader, I didn't realise it was a proportion sign. And most sites only show images for formulas, which are inaccessible too. Also, I am assuming you use latec or math jacks for the symbols here, which also make the screen reader hang In a cycle. Could you give me a simple ASCII form of the distance given a period?
$endgroup$
– triple7
10 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@triple7: Keplers law says that the square of the period divided by the cube of the distance is equal to a constant for every central body. so, t squared divided by a cubed should be the same for the ISS and for the moon. After Kepler, Newton was able to come up with a theoretical formula to predict what this constant should be, which is 4 * pi squared / (G * M), where G is Newton's constant, and M is the mass of the central body.
$endgroup$
– Jerry Schirmer
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yep, finally found it. Thanks
$endgroup$
– triple7
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
that equality should be a proportional to sign. In particular, in SI, the squared period has units of seconds squared, and the semi-major radius of of the orbit cubed is in meters cubed, so they can't be equal.
Instead, I'd be checking whether $T^{2}/a^{3}$ is constant for different satellites orbiting the same object (Like the ISS and the moon, for example)
answered 10 hours ago
Jerry SchirmerJerry Schirmer
31.7k257107
$endgroup$
that equality should be a proportional to sign. In particular, in SI, the squared period has units of seconds squared, and the semi-major radius of of the orbit cubed is in meters cubed, so they can't be equal.
Instead, I'd be checking whether $T^{2}/a^{3}$ is constant for different satellites orbiting the same object (Like the ISS and the moon, for example)
answered 10 hours ago
Jerry SchirmerJerry Schirmer
31.7k257107
edited 10 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
Jerry SchirmerJerry Schirmer
31.7k257107
answered 10 hours ago
Jerry SchirmerJerry Schirmer
31.7k257107
answered 10 hours ago
Jerry SchirmerJerry Schirmer
31.7k257107
31.7k257107
6
$begingroup$
Ok, as I'm blind and use a screenreader, I didn't realise it was a proportion sign. And most sites only show images for formulas, which are inaccessible too. Also, I am assuming you use latec or math jacks for the symbols here, which also make the screen reader hang In a cycle. Could you give me a simple ASCII form of the distance given a period?
$endgroup$
– triple7
10 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@triple7: Keplers law says that the square of the period divided by the cube of the distance is equal to a constant for every central body. so, t squared divided by a cubed should be the same for the ISS and for the moon. After Kepler, Newton was able to come up with a theoretical formula to predict what this constant should be, which is 4 * pi squared / (G * M), where G is Newton's constant, and M is the mass of the central body.
$endgroup$
– Jerry Schirmer
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yep, finally found it. Thanks
$endgroup$
– triple7
10 hours ago
add a comment |
6
$begingroup$
Ok, as I'm blind and use a screenreader, I didn't realise it was a proportion sign. And most sites only show images for formulas, which are inaccessible too. Also, I am assuming you use latec or math jacks for the symbols here, which also make the screen reader hang In a cycle. Could you give me a simple ASCII form of the distance given a period?
$endgroup$
– triple7
10 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@triple7: Keplers law says that the square of the period divided by the cube of the distance is equal to a constant for every central body. so, t squared divided by a cubed should be the same for the ISS and for the moon. After Kepler, Newton was able to come up with a theoretical formula to predict what this constant should be, which is 4 * pi squared / (G * M), where G is Newton's constant, and M is the mass of the central body.
$endgroup$
– Jerry Schirmer
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yep, finally found it. Thanks
$endgroup$
– triple7
10 hours ago
6
6
$begingroup$
Ok, as I'm blind and use a screenreader, I didn't realise it was a proportion sign. And most sites only show images for formulas, which are inaccessible too. Also, I am assuming you use latec or math jacks for the symbols here, which also make the screen reader hang In a cycle. Could you give me a simple ASCII form of the distance given a period?
$endgroup$
– triple7
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ok, as I'm blind and use a screenreader, I didn't realise it was a proportion sign. And most sites only show images for formulas, which are inaccessible too. Also, I am assuming you use latec or math jacks for the symbols here, which also make the screen reader hang In a cycle. Could you give me a simple ASCII form of the distance given a period?
$endgroup$
– triple7
10 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
@triple7: Keplers law says that the square of the period divided by the cube of the distance is equal to a constant for every central body. so, t squared divided by a cubed should be the same for the ISS and for the moon. After Kepler, Newton was able to come up with a theoretical formula to predict what this constant should be, which is 4 * pi squared / (G * M), where G is Newton's constant, and M is the mass of the central body.
$endgroup$
– Jerry Schirmer
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@triple7: Keplers law says that the square of the period divided by the cube of the distance is equal to a constant for every central body. so, t squared divided by a cubed should be the same for the ISS and for the moon. After Kepler, Newton was able to come up with a theoretical formula to predict what this constant should be, which is 4 * pi squared / (G * M), where G is Newton's constant, and M is the mass of the central body.
$endgroup$
– Jerry Schirmer
10 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Yep, finally found it. Thanks
$endgroup$
– triple7
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yep, finally found it. Thanks
$endgroup$
– triple7
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The general form of Kepler's period law is $T^2 = frac{4pi^2}{G(M+m)}a^3$. Often, we make the simplifying assumption that $M>>m$, so that $M+m approx M$.
Kepler's period law only takes the form $T^2 = a^3$ (forgetting about the units) when you use certain quantities- in this case, $M$ being solar mass, $T$ being an Earth year, and $a$ being an astronomical unit.
Try plugging into the equation for the mass of earth (and don't bother with the satellite mass) and use units of meters and seconds. See if you get the right result!
answered 10 hours ago
swickrotationswickrotation
715
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I used seconds and meters. R would be planet radius and satellite altitude, and the numbers seem to correspond. I needed this parameter to calculate the distance between two points by lat long alt, so i’m subtracting earth’s radius to the result of the kepler equation. I just wish math reading blind wasn’t so convoluted :/
$endgroup$
– triple7
59 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The general form of Kepler's period law is $T^2 = frac{4pi^2}{G(M+m)}a^3$. Often, we make the simplifying assumption that $M>>m$, so that $M+m approx M$.
Kepler's period law only takes the form $T^2 = a^3$ (forgetting about the units) when you use certain quantities- in this case, $M$ being solar mass, $T$ being an Earth year, and $a$ being an astronomical unit.
Try plugging into the equation for the mass of earth (and don't bother with the satellite mass) and use units of meters and seconds. See if you get the right result!
answered 10 hours ago
swickrotationswickrotation
715
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I used seconds and meters. R would be planet radius and satellite altitude, and the numbers seem to correspond. I needed this parameter to calculate the distance between two points by lat long alt, so i’m subtracting earth’s radius to the result of the kepler equation. I just wish math reading blind wasn’t so convoluted :/
$endgroup$
– triple7
59 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The general form of Kepler's period law is $T^2 = frac{4pi^2}{G(M+m)}a^3$. Often, we make the simplifying assumption that $M>>m$, so that $M+m approx M$.
Kepler's period law only takes the form $T^2 = a^3$ (forgetting about the units) when you use certain quantities- in this case, $M$ being solar mass, $T$ being an Earth year, and $a$ being an astronomical unit.
Try plugging into the equation for the mass of earth (and don't bother with the satellite mass) and use units of meters and seconds. See if you get the right result!
answered 10 hours ago
swickrotationswickrotation
715
$endgroup$
The general form of Kepler's period law is $T^2 = frac{4pi^2}{G(M+m)}a^3$. Often, we make the simplifying assumption that $M>>m$, so that $M+m approx M$.
Kepler's period law only takes the form $T^2 = a^3$ (forgetting about the units) when you use certain quantities- in this case, $M$ being solar mass, $T$ being an Earth year, and $a$ being an astronomical unit.
Try plugging into the equation for the mass of earth (and don't bother with the satellite mass) and use units of meters and seconds. See if you get the right result!
answered 10 hours ago
swickrotationswickrotation
715
edited 10 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
swickrotationswickrotation
715
answered 10 hours ago
swickrotationswickrotation
715
answered 10 hours ago
swickrotationswickrotation
715
715
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I used seconds and meters. R would be planet radius and satellite altitude, and the numbers seem to correspond. I needed this parameter to calculate the distance between two points by lat long alt, so i’m subtracting earth’s radius to the result of the kepler equation. I just wish math reading blind wasn’t so convoluted :/
$endgroup$
– triple7
59 mins ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I used seconds and meters. R would be planet radius and satellite altitude, and the numbers seem to correspond. I needed this parameter to calculate the distance between two points by lat long alt, so i’m subtracting earth’s radius to the result of the kepler equation. I just wish math reading blind wasn’t so convoluted :/
$endgroup$
– triple7
59 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I used seconds and meters. R would be planet radius and satellite altitude, and the numbers seem to correspond. I needed this parameter to calculate the distance between two points by lat long alt, so i’m subtracting earth’s radius to the result of the kepler equation. I just wish math reading blind wasn’t so convoluted :/
$endgroup$
– triple7
59 mins ago
$begingroup$
Yes, I used seconds and meters. R would be planet radius and satellite altitude, and the numbers seem to correspond. I needed this parameter to calculate the distance between two points by lat long alt, so i’m subtracting earth’s radius to the result of the kepler equation. I just wish math reading blind wasn’t so convoluted :/
$endgroup$
– triple7
59 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Kepler's third law claims that $p^2 propto a^3$. The equality sign you use is incorrect.
answered 10 hours ago
my2ctsmy2cts
5,9642719
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Kepler's third law claims that $p^2 propto a^3$. The equality sign you use is incorrect.
answered 10 hours ago
my2ctsmy2cts
5,9642719
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Kepler's third law claims that $p^2 propto a^3$. The equality sign you use is incorrect.
answered 10 hours ago
my2ctsmy2cts
5,9642719
$endgroup$
Kepler's third law claims that $p^2 propto a^3$. The equality sign you use is incorrect.
answered 10 hours ago
my2ctsmy2cts
5,9642719
answered 10 hours ago
my2ctsmy2cts
5,9642719
answered 10 hours ago
my2ctsmy2cts
5,9642719
answered 10 hours ago
my2ctsmy2cts
5,9642719
5,9642719
add a comment |
add a comment |
triple7 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
triple7 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
triple7 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
triple7 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474399%2fkeplers-3rd-law-ratios-dont-fit-data%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kepler.html#c6
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
The equality only holds in certain units since its dimensionally inhomogeneous. In particular, if you use Earth years and the Earth-Sun distance (i.e. 1a.u.) then it's true, so it must be true in those specific units.
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
BTW, do you understand that $a$ is not altitude but rather distance from the center of the Earth?
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
No satellite orbits earth at an altitude of 705 of any commonly used unit--that's either so far out it's lost or it's deep under the surface. Kepler's third law is talking about the distance between the centers, not the distance between the surfaces.
$endgroup$
– Loren Pechtel
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
Aqua has a 95 minute orbit revolution and is at 705 km altitude above earth’s surface. I have taken into account earth’s radius...
$endgroup$
– triple7
18 mins ago