Recursive calls to a function - why is the address of the parameter passed to it lowering with each call? ...

What documents does someone with a long-term visa need to travel to another Schengen country?

How is an IPA symbol that lacks a name (e.g. ɲ) called?

Why aren't these two solutions equivalent? Combinatorics problem

Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll?

Why does my GNOME settings mention "Moto C Plus"?

A German immigrant ancestor has a "Registration Affidavit of Alien Enemy" on file. What does that mean exactly?

What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?

Who can become a wight?

Meaning of "Not holding on that level of emuna/bitachon"

Protagonist's race is hidden - should I reveal it?

What is her name?

2 sample t test for sample sizes - 30,000 and 150,000

Why aren't road bike wheels tiny?

Can I take recommendation from someone I met at a conference?

Should man-made satellites feature an intelligent inverted "cow catcher"?

Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?

Can this water damage be explained by lack of gutters and grading issues?

Does using the Inspiration rules for character defects encourage My Guy Syndrome?

Suing a Police Officer Instead of the Police Department

Converting a text document with special format to Pandas DataFrame

How to create a command for the "strange m" symbol in latex?

How to charge percentage of transaction cost?

What helicopter has the most rotor blades?

Is Bran literally the world's memory?



Recursive calls to a function - why is the address of the parameter passed to it lowering with each call?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!What is the direction of stack growth in most modern systems?Why isn't sizeof for a struct equal to the sum of sizeof of each member?How to call a parent class function from derived class function?Why do we need virtual functions in C++?Pretty-print C++ STL containersHow to pass normal param as well as template param in a template function in C++?Are the days of passing const std::string & as a parameter over?Recursive Reverse FunctionWhy can I not move unique_ptr from a set to a function argument using an iterator?Why can I not call reserve on a vector of const elements?Having issues with .h file, it doesn't seem to be linking correctly





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







9















Consider following code:



#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void test_func(int address) {
cout<<&address<<" ";
if(address < 0x7FFBEE26) {
test_func(address);
}
}
int main()
{
test_func(512);
cout<<"Hello";
return 0;
}


Hello from main() is certainly not reached, since the recursive calls to test_func never end.



However, from what I can see in the cout present in test_func - the addresses being printed are lower and lower with each iteration. Why is that happening?










share|improve this question









New contributor




tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 4





    You are passing a copy - that has to have an address

    – UnholySheep
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    Remember that the default stack size on linux is 10MB and its 1 MB on windows. Also the stack need not be in the same location each time you run your program.

    – drescherjm
    7 hours ago













  • I can't understand why this isn't eligible for tail-call optimization. The invocation of test_func is the last line in the function...

    – cyberbisson
    6 hours ago








  • 6





    @cyberbisson The parameters of the nested invocations of test_func must appear to have different addresses per language rules, and because the address of address was passed to operator<< the compiler can't prove that this is unobservable.

    – T.C.
    5 hours ago











  • @T.C. So, the problem is that the callee might remember and use it still?

    – Deduplicator
    4 hours ago


















9















Consider following code:



#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void test_func(int address) {
cout<<&address<<" ";
if(address < 0x7FFBEE26) {
test_func(address);
}
}
int main()
{
test_func(512);
cout<<"Hello";
return 0;
}


Hello from main() is certainly not reached, since the recursive calls to test_func never end.



However, from what I can see in the cout present in test_func - the addresses being printed are lower and lower with each iteration. Why is that happening?










share|improve this question









New contributor




tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 4





    You are passing a copy - that has to have an address

    – UnholySheep
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    Remember that the default stack size on linux is 10MB and its 1 MB on windows. Also the stack need not be in the same location each time you run your program.

    – drescherjm
    7 hours ago













  • I can't understand why this isn't eligible for tail-call optimization. The invocation of test_func is the last line in the function...

    – cyberbisson
    6 hours ago








  • 6





    @cyberbisson The parameters of the nested invocations of test_func must appear to have different addresses per language rules, and because the address of address was passed to operator<< the compiler can't prove that this is unobservable.

    – T.C.
    5 hours ago











  • @T.C. So, the problem is that the callee might remember and use it still?

    – Deduplicator
    4 hours ago














9












9








9








Consider following code:



#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void test_func(int address) {
cout<<&address<<" ";
if(address < 0x7FFBEE26) {
test_func(address);
}
}
int main()
{
test_func(512);
cout<<"Hello";
return 0;
}


Hello from main() is certainly not reached, since the recursive calls to test_func never end.



However, from what I can see in the cout present in test_func - the addresses being printed are lower and lower with each iteration. Why is that happening?










share|improve this question









New contributor




tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Consider following code:



#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void test_func(int address) {
cout<<&address<<" ";
if(address < 0x7FFBEE26) {
test_func(address);
}
}
int main()
{
test_func(512);
cout<<"Hello";
return 0;
}


Hello from main() is certainly not reached, since the recursive calls to test_func never end.



However, from what I can see in the cout present in test_func - the addresses being printed are lower and lower with each iteration. Why is that happening?







c++






share|improve this question









New contributor




tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago









drescherjm

6,59923553




6,59923553






New contributor




tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 7 hours ago









tears allotears allo

491




491




New contributor




tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 4





    You are passing a copy - that has to have an address

    – UnholySheep
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    Remember that the default stack size on linux is 10MB and its 1 MB on windows. Also the stack need not be in the same location each time you run your program.

    – drescherjm
    7 hours ago













  • I can't understand why this isn't eligible for tail-call optimization. The invocation of test_func is the last line in the function...

    – cyberbisson
    6 hours ago








  • 6





    @cyberbisson The parameters of the nested invocations of test_func must appear to have different addresses per language rules, and because the address of address was passed to operator<< the compiler can't prove that this is unobservable.

    – T.C.
    5 hours ago











  • @T.C. So, the problem is that the callee might remember and use it still?

    – Deduplicator
    4 hours ago














  • 4





    You are passing a copy - that has to have an address

    – UnholySheep
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    Remember that the default stack size on linux is 10MB and its 1 MB on windows. Also the stack need not be in the same location each time you run your program.

    – drescherjm
    7 hours ago













  • I can't understand why this isn't eligible for tail-call optimization. The invocation of test_func is the last line in the function...

    – cyberbisson
    6 hours ago








  • 6





    @cyberbisson The parameters of the nested invocations of test_func must appear to have different addresses per language rules, and because the address of address was passed to operator<< the compiler can't prove that this is unobservable.

    – T.C.
    5 hours ago











  • @T.C. So, the problem is that the callee might remember and use it still?

    – Deduplicator
    4 hours ago








4




4





You are passing a copy - that has to have an address

– UnholySheep
7 hours ago





You are passing a copy - that has to have an address

– UnholySheep
7 hours ago




1




1





Remember that the default stack size on linux is 10MB and its 1 MB on windows. Also the stack need not be in the same location each time you run your program.

– drescherjm
7 hours ago







Remember that the default stack size on linux is 10MB and its 1 MB on windows. Also the stack need not be in the same location each time you run your program.

– drescherjm
7 hours ago















I can't understand why this isn't eligible for tail-call optimization. The invocation of test_func is the last line in the function...

– cyberbisson
6 hours ago







I can't understand why this isn't eligible for tail-call optimization. The invocation of test_func is the last line in the function...

– cyberbisson
6 hours ago






6




6





@cyberbisson The parameters of the nested invocations of test_func must appear to have different addresses per language rules, and because the address of address was passed to operator<< the compiler can't prove that this is unobservable.

– T.C.
5 hours ago





@cyberbisson The parameters of the nested invocations of test_func must appear to have different addresses per language rules, and because the address of address was passed to operator<< the compiler can't prove that this is unobservable.

– T.C.
5 hours ago













@T.C. So, the problem is that the callee might remember and use it still?

– Deduplicator
4 hours ago





@T.C. So, the problem is that the callee might remember and use it still?

– Deduplicator
4 hours ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















18














Likely address is being placed on the stack and, on your platform, the stack grows downward in memory. See this question about stack growth direction for more.






share|improve this answer
























  • Is it placed on the stack instead of in a register because its address is taken?

    – ᆼᆺᆼ
    1 hour ago











  • @ᆼᆺᆼ no, it is because on 32bit systems, the default calling convention in most C/C++ compilers is cdecl, which passes parameters on the call stack only. Compile your code for 64bit, or alter your function to use a register-based calling convention, and you will likely see different results

    – Remy Lebeau
    1 hour ago














Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






tears allo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55800947%2frecursive-calls-to-a-function-why-is-the-address-of-the-parameter-passed-to-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









18














Likely address is being placed on the stack and, on your platform, the stack grows downward in memory. See this question about stack growth direction for more.






share|improve this answer
























  • Is it placed on the stack instead of in a register because its address is taken?

    – ᆼᆺᆼ
    1 hour ago











  • @ᆼᆺᆼ no, it is because on 32bit systems, the default calling convention in most C/C++ compilers is cdecl, which passes parameters on the call stack only. Compile your code for 64bit, or alter your function to use a register-based calling convention, and you will likely see different results

    – Remy Lebeau
    1 hour ago


















18














Likely address is being placed on the stack and, on your platform, the stack grows downward in memory. See this question about stack growth direction for more.






share|improve this answer
























  • Is it placed on the stack instead of in a register because its address is taken?

    – ᆼᆺᆼ
    1 hour ago











  • @ᆼᆺᆼ no, it is because on 32bit systems, the default calling convention in most C/C++ compilers is cdecl, which passes parameters on the call stack only. Compile your code for 64bit, or alter your function to use a register-based calling convention, and you will likely see different results

    – Remy Lebeau
    1 hour ago
















18












18








18







Likely address is being placed on the stack and, on your platform, the stack grows downward in memory. See this question about stack growth direction for more.






share|improve this answer













Likely address is being placed on the stack and, on your platform, the stack grows downward in memory. See this question about stack growth direction for more.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 7 hours ago









David SchwartzDavid Schwartz

140k14146232




140k14146232













  • Is it placed on the stack instead of in a register because its address is taken?

    – ᆼᆺᆼ
    1 hour ago











  • @ᆼᆺᆼ no, it is because on 32bit systems, the default calling convention in most C/C++ compilers is cdecl, which passes parameters on the call stack only. Compile your code for 64bit, or alter your function to use a register-based calling convention, and you will likely see different results

    – Remy Lebeau
    1 hour ago





















  • Is it placed on the stack instead of in a register because its address is taken?

    – ᆼᆺᆼ
    1 hour ago











  • @ᆼᆺᆼ no, it is because on 32bit systems, the default calling convention in most C/C++ compilers is cdecl, which passes parameters on the call stack only. Compile your code for 64bit, or alter your function to use a register-based calling convention, and you will likely see different results

    – Remy Lebeau
    1 hour ago



















Is it placed on the stack instead of in a register because its address is taken?

– ᆼᆺᆼ
1 hour ago





Is it placed on the stack instead of in a register because its address is taken?

– ᆼᆺᆼ
1 hour ago













@ᆼᆺᆼ no, it is because on 32bit systems, the default calling convention in most C/C++ compilers is cdecl, which passes parameters on the call stack only. Compile your code for 64bit, or alter your function to use a register-based calling convention, and you will likely see different results

– Remy Lebeau
1 hour ago







@ᆼᆺᆼ no, it is because on 32bit systems, the default calling convention in most C/C++ compilers is cdecl, which passes parameters on the call stack only. Compile your code for 64bit, or alter your function to use a register-based calling convention, and you will likely see different results

– Remy Lebeau
1 hour ago














tears allo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















tears allo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













tears allo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












tears allo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55800947%2frecursive-calls-to-a-function-why-is-the-address-of-the-parameter-passed-to-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll? Announcing the arrival of...

Couldn't open a raw socket. Error: Permission denied (13) (nmap)Is it possible to run networking commands...

VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...