How can I add encounters in the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign without giving PCs too much XP? ...
Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?
Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?
Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?
Presidential Pardon
Variable with quotation marks "$()"
Can I visit the Trinity College (Cambridge) library and see some of their rare books
Huge performance difference of the command find with and without using %M option to show permissions
How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?
Identify 80s or 90s comics with ripped creatures (not dwarves)
Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?
How to determine omitted units in a publication
Drawing vertical/oblique lines in Metrical tree (tikz-qtree, tipa)
Why did Peik Lin say, "I'm not an animal"?
Make it rain characters
What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?
"is" operation returns false even though two objects have same id
Student Loan from years ago pops up and is taking my salary
How do I design a circuit to convert a 100 mV and 50 Hz sine wave to a square wave?
should truth entail possible truth
What is the padding with red substance inside of steak packaging?
When did F become S? Why?
How do spell lists change if the party levels up without taking a long rest?
Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?
Simulating Exploding Dice
How can I add encounters in the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign without giving PCs too much XP?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)In the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign, is it a problem to have PCs advance above level 5?Clarifying the wraith's Life Drain attack in the Lost Mine of Phandelver adventureHow to play Lost Mine of Phandelver in 3.5e?How does Lost Mines of Phandelver expect PCs to take on side quests without demanding pay?Are XP award for one large encounter vs. lots of smaller encounters different?Why can less difficult encounters be worth more experience?How can I balance gradual character advancement for new players vs. trying to keep the PCs at a similar level?Why are all of the encounters in the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign Hard or Deadly?Awarding encounter experience when enemies flee/get intimidated/are convinced to helpIn the Lost Mine of Phandelver adventure, when does the Flameskull attack?In the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign, is it a problem to have PCs advance above level 5?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
I'm currently reading the LMOP scenario. I was thinking about adding some encounters if the PCs want to explore the forest or other side-story zones that aren't considered in the book.
But actually I don't want them to earn too much XP from these, plus I've never DMed before so I'm not aware at all what XP quantities represent.
The reason I'm concerned with giving them XP is that:
- It can lead to them being higher than level 5 before the end (I've asked here whether that's a serious concern)
- Maybe the PCs end up trying to farm XP by just going side-road to easily go through the following of the scenario
What I've already thought about:
Within the scenario, each encounter is specifically awarded with XP, so I might only give XP for scripted encounters, but it might look a bit disappointing for players.
On the other hand, if I award them with the full XP given in the monster's stats blocks, it might end up with one of the problems I mentioned above.
Given prior experiences as a GM or player (especially with LMOP in particular), how can I give PCs XP for encounters that aren't scripted without changing too much of the scenario level expectation?
dnd-5e published-adventures experience-points encounters lost-mine-of-phandelver
edited yesterday
V2Blast
26.7k592162
asked yesterday
ZomaZoma
670120
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm currently reading the LMOP scenario. I was thinking about adding some encounters if the PCs want to explore the forest or other side-story zones that aren't considered in the book.
But actually I don't want them to earn too much XP from these, plus I've never DMed before so I'm not aware at all what XP quantities represent.
The reason I'm concerned with giving them XP is that:
- It can lead to them being higher than level 5 before the end (I've asked here whether that's a serious concern)
- Maybe the PCs end up trying to farm XP by just going side-road to easily go through the following of the scenario
What I've already thought about:
Within the scenario, each encounter is specifically awarded with XP, so I might only give XP for scripted encounters, but it might look a bit disappointing for players.
On the other hand, if I award them with the full XP given in the monster's stats blocks, it might end up with one of the problems I mentioned above.
Given prior experiences as a GM or player (especially with LMOP in particular), how can I give PCs XP for encounters that aren't scripted without changing too much of the scenario level expectation?
dnd-5e published-adventures experience-points encounters lost-mine-of-phandelver
edited yesterday
V2Blast
26.7k592162
asked yesterday
ZomaZoma
670120
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If you decide to go with no XP for these extra encounters, just let the players know beforehand that you will be running things that way, and then make sure to provide other types of rewards for the encounter. That could be as simple as just a bit of extra cash, some unique equipment (not powerful, or magical, just memorable), or information that could make the next scripted encounter a bit easier.
$endgroup$
– Michael Richardson
yesterday
$begingroup$
@MichaelRichardson as I commented in both answers, I guess I'll just ask them which system they do prefer, then just use it so they'll be aware of it. For me both answers are a good way to deal with it, so I'd like to let players choose which one they prefer.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
$begingroup$
Not an answer to the XP bit so I'll leave it as a comment: if you're concerned about the PCs trying to farm XP, just put them under some pressure. Players dawdling? letter from the Black Spider giving them N days to deliver some cash or he'll start killing the hostages (other motivations are available)
$endgroup$
– walrus
14 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm currently reading the LMOP scenario. I was thinking about adding some encounters if the PCs want to explore the forest or other side-story zones that aren't considered in the book.
But actually I don't want them to earn too much XP from these, plus I've never DMed before so I'm not aware at all what XP quantities represent.
The reason I'm concerned with giving them XP is that:
- It can lead to them being higher than level 5 before the end (I've asked here whether that's a serious concern)
- Maybe the PCs end up trying to farm XP by just going side-road to easily go through the following of the scenario
What I've already thought about:
Within the scenario, each encounter is specifically awarded with XP, so I might only give XP for scripted encounters, but it might look a bit disappointing for players.
On the other hand, if I award them with the full XP given in the monster's stats blocks, it might end up with one of the problems I mentioned above.
Given prior experiences as a GM or player (especially with LMOP in particular), how can I give PCs XP for encounters that aren't scripted without changing too much of the scenario level expectation?
dnd-5e published-adventures experience-points encounters lost-mine-of-phandelver
edited yesterday
V2Blast
26.7k592162
asked yesterday
ZomaZoma
670120
$endgroup$
I'm currently reading the LMOP scenario. I was thinking about adding some encounters if the PCs want to explore the forest or other side-story zones that aren't considered in the book.
But actually I don't want them to earn too much XP from these, plus I've never DMed before so I'm not aware at all what XP quantities represent.
The reason I'm concerned with giving them XP is that:
- It can lead to them being higher than level 5 before the end (I've asked here whether that's a serious concern)
- Maybe the PCs end up trying to farm XP by just going side-road to easily go through the following of the scenario
What I've already thought about:
Within the scenario, each encounter is specifically awarded with XP, so I might only give XP for scripted encounters, but it might look a bit disappointing for players.
On the other hand, if I award them with the full XP given in the monster's stats blocks, it might end up with one of the problems I mentioned above.
Given prior experiences as a GM or player (especially with LMOP in particular), how can I give PCs XP for encounters that aren't scripted without changing too much of the scenario level expectation?
dnd-5e published-adventures experience-points encounters lost-mine-of-phandelver
dnd-5e published-adventures experience-points encounters lost-mine-of-phandelver
edited yesterday
V2Blast
26.7k592162
asked yesterday
ZomaZoma
670120
edited yesterday
V2Blast
26.7k592162
asked yesterday
ZomaZoma
670120
edited yesterday
V2Blast
26.7k592162
edited yesterday
V2Blast
26.7k592162
edited yesterday
V2Blast
26.7k592162
26.7k592162
asked yesterday
ZomaZoma
670120
asked yesterday
ZomaZoma
670120
asked yesterday
ZomaZoma
670120
670120
$begingroup$
If you decide to go with no XP for these extra encounters, just let the players know beforehand that you will be running things that way, and then make sure to provide other types of rewards for the encounter. That could be as simple as just a bit of extra cash, some unique equipment (not powerful, or magical, just memorable), or information that could make the next scripted encounter a bit easier.
$endgroup$
– Michael Richardson
yesterday
$begingroup$
@MichaelRichardson as I commented in both answers, I guess I'll just ask them which system they do prefer, then just use it so they'll be aware of it. For me both answers are a good way to deal with it, so I'd like to let players choose which one they prefer.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
$begingroup$
Not an answer to the XP bit so I'll leave it as a comment: if you're concerned about the PCs trying to farm XP, just put them under some pressure. Players dawdling? letter from the Black Spider giving them N days to deliver some cash or he'll start killing the hostages (other motivations are available)
$endgroup$
– walrus
14 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you decide to go with no XP for these extra encounters, just let the players know beforehand that you will be running things that way, and then make sure to provide other types of rewards for the encounter. That could be as simple as just a bit of extra cash, some unique equipment (not powerful, or magical, just memorable), or information that could make the next scripted encounter a bit easier.
$endgroup$
– Michael Richardson
yesterday
$begingroup$
@MichaelRichardson as I commented in both answers, I guess I'll just ask them which system they do prefer, then just use it so they'll be aware of it. For me both answers are a good way to deal with it, so I'd like to let players choose which one they prefer.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
$begingroup$
Not an answer to the XP bit so I'll leave it as a comment: if you're concerned about the PCs trying to farm XP, just put them under some pressure. Players dawdling? letter from the Black Spider giving them N days to deliver some cash or he'll start killing the hostages (other motivations are available)
$endgroup$
– walrus
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you decide to go with no XP for these extra encounters, just let the players know beforehand that you will be running things that way, and then make sure to provide other types of rewards for the encounter. That could be as simple as just a bit of extra cash, some unique equipment (not powerful, or magical, just memorable), or information that could make the next scripted encounter a bit easier.
$endgroup$
– Michael Richardson
yesterday
$begingroup$
If you decide to go with no XP for these extra encounters, just let the players know beforehand that you will be running things that way, and then make sure to provide other types of rewards for the encounter. That could be as simple as just a bit of extra cash, some unique equipment (not powerful, or magical, just memorable), or information that could make the next scripted encounter a bit easier.
$endgroup$
– Michael Richardson
yesterday
$begingroup$
@MichaelRichardson as I commented in both answers, I guess I'll just ask them which system they do prefer, then just use it so they'll be aware of it. For me both answers are a good way to deal with it, so I'd like to let players choose which one they prefer.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
$begingroup$
@MichaelRichardson as I commented in both answers, I guess I'll just ask them which system they do prefer, then just use it so they'll be aware of it. For me both answers are a good way to deal with it, so I'd like to let players choose which one they prefer.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
$begingroup$
Not an answer to the XP bit so I'll leave it as a comment: if you're concerned about the PCs trying to farm XP, just put them under some pressure. Players dawdling? letter from the Black Spider giving them N days to deliver some cash or he'll start killing the hostages (other motivations are available)
$endgroup$
– walrus
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not an answer to the XP bit so I'll leave it as a comment: if you're concerned about the PCs trying to farm XP, just put them under some pressure. Players dawdling? letter from the Black Spider giving them N days to deliver some cash or he'll start killing the hostages (other motivations are available)
$endgroup$
– walrus
14 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'm going to challenge your premise a bit - why not drop XP-based levelling altogether and use milestone levelling instead? In my time as a DM and a player, I've found milestone has a few advantages:
- Less resource management. Counting all your XP is a bit tedious.
- Less DM work. You can tailor encounters that are fun and play to your party's strengths, and you don't need to come up with XP rewards for everything.
- The party levels up when they need to. The DM decides when the party has gained enough experience to level up, which means the party doesn't have to go encounter-scumming to get those last few hundred XP needed to level up before they embark on the next adventure. Similarly the party won't get over-levelled by going out of their way to get XP!
If you still want to reward the players for completing the side-encounters you can reward them with items, clues or gold instead of XP.
In general, choosing where to place milestones is an art rather than a science.
If I'm running a homebrewed adventure or a sandbox campaign, I will usually use my "gut feeling" to decide when PCs have done enough to merit a level up, or use major character goals to help decide. For published adventures I will look through the book to see what levels the writers had in mind for each chapter. As for LMOP in particular you should be able to award one level per chapter, which I've based on the following:
- "allow them to advance their characters to 2nd level before continuing the adventure" p12 LMOP (end of Chapter 1)
- "At some point during part 2, the characters are likely to advance to 3rd level" p26 LMOP (end of Chapter 2)
- "This part of the adventure is designed for characters of at least 4th level" p42 LMOP (start of Chapter 4)
- "By the end of the adventure, the characters should be 5th level." p51 (Conclusion of Chapter 4)
answered yesterday
jambrothersjambrothers
40647
New contributor
jambrothers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to the rpg stack..? Seems you have been here a while actually. Excellent answer though. Good luck and happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Really nice answer (especially the reward part, don't know how I didn't manage to think of this). But the scenario doesn't have these milestones past the first chapter, so how could I define where are they ?
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
$begingroup$
That's really close to what OP said they don't want : "I might only give EXP for scripted encounters, but it might look a bit disappointing for players"
$endgroup$
– Pierre Cathé
yesterday
4
$begingroup$
@Zoma I've added a bit at the end to show where you could add milestones based on the adventure, I haven't ever played it all the way through so I can't offer personal experience specific to LMOP I'm afraid!
$endgroup$
– jambrothers
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@PierreCathé I don't think it's the same at all - OP would be giving EXP for no encounters, so the side encounters wouldn't be less rewarding (in that respect) than the main ones. This answer also suggests alternative rewards that can make the encounters feel worthwhile in and of themselves.
$endgroup$
– Andrzej Doyle
yesterday
|
show 6 more comments
$begingroup$
Make subsequent encounters harder
Disclaimer: this is based on my experience as a GM running my own adventures, not LMOP
It seems like you're afraid of giving your PCs too much power, allowing them to breeze through the end content of the module. This is a valid concern, as the players might get less engaged in the game. If you see that this is the case, then it is your prerogative (and duty) as the GM to make the later encounters harder.
If the encounters are too easy for your players (regardless of their level, as some players have better optimisation/tactics than others), there are several things you can do to make them tougher. Your adventure module should already contain some tips on how to make combat encounters harder, and as the GM you can do whatever you feel is right.
Options include (but are not restricted to):
- increase the number of enemies
- add some thematically appropriate foes
- tweak the stats of existing enemies to make them scarier
- add interesting terrain (pits, rubble, cover, whatever feels appropriate)
- use tactics beyond "hit closest PC"
answered yesterday
Pierre CathéPierre Cathé
2638
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
While this is a nice answer, my problem isn't that scripted encounter are too easy. I just want to add more encounters, not to make the scenario harder, but to add flavour for PCs who wants to explore a bit more than what the scenario expect. If that isn't evident in my question I can edit it. If you meant to say I should make additional encounters I could add harder, can you add more details on how make additional encounters harder could help me with EXP distribution ?
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@Zoma You say you fear the PCs gaining too much XP (which would make them stronger). What I am suggesting is you let them gain that extra XP and make the scripted encounters harder to account for that. I'll edit for clarity
$endgroup$
– Pierre Cathé
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Thanks for the edit, I didn't get what you meant, but it's much clearer and even more valuable with these precisions. I guess I'll ask my players what they do prefer and adopt the associated answer.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145011%2fhow-can-i-add-encounters-in-the-lost-mine-of-phandelver-campaign-without-giving%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'm going to challenge your premise a bit - why not drop XP-based levelling altogether and use milestone levelling instead? In my time as a DM and a player, I've found milestone has a few advantages:
- Less resource management. Counting all your XP is a bit tedious.
- Less DM work. You can tailor encounters that are fun and play to your party's strengths, and you don't need to come up with XP rewards for everything.
- The party levels up when they need to. The DM decides when the party has gained enough experience to level up, which means the party doesn't have to go encounter-scumming to get those last few hundred XP needed to level up before they embark on the next adventure. Similarly the party won't get over-levelled by going out of their way to get XP!
If you still want to reward the players for completing the side-encounters you can reward them with items, clues or gold instead of XP.
In general, choosing where to place milestones is an art rather than a science.
If I'm running a homebrewed adventure or a sandbox campaign, I will usually use my "gut feeling" to decide when PCs have done enough to merit a level up, or use major character goals to help decide. For published adventures I will look through the book to see what levels the writers had in mind for each chapter. As for LMOP in particular you should be able to award one level per chapter, which I've based on the following:
- "allow them to advance their characters to 2nd level before continuing the adventure" p12 LMOP (end of Chapter 1)
- "At some point during part 2, the characters are likely to advance to 3rd level" p26 LMOP (end of Chapter 2)
- "This part of the adventure is designed for characters of at least 4th level" p42 LMOP (start of Chapter 4)
- "By the end of the adventure, the characters should be 5th level." p51 (Conclusion of Chapter 4)
answered yesterday
jambrothersjambrothers
40647
New contributor
jambrothers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to the rpg stack..? Seems you have been here a while actually. Excellent answer though. Good luck and happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Really nice answer (especially the reward part, don't know how I didn't manage to think of this). But the scenario doesn't have these milestones past the first chapter, so how could I define where are they ?
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
$begingroup$
That's really close to what OP said they don't want : "I might only give EXP for scripted encounters, but it might look a bit disappointing for players"
$endgroup$
– Pierre Cathé
yesterday
4
$begingroup$
@Zoma I've added a bit at the end to show where you could add milestones based on the adventure, I haven't ever played it all the way through so I can't offer personal experience specific to LMOP I'm afraid!
$endgroup$
– jambrothers
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@PierreCathé I don't think it's the same at all - OP would be giving EXP for no encounters, so the side encounters wouldn't be less rewarding (in that respect) than the main ones. This answer also suggests alternative rewards that can make the encounters feel worthwhile in and of themselves.
$endgroup$
– Andrzej Doyle
yesterday
|
show 6 more comments
$begingroup$
I'm going to challenge your premise a bit - why not drop XP-based levelling altogether and use milestone levelling instead? In my time as a DM and a player, I've found milestone has a few advantages:
- Less resource management. Counting all your XP is a bit tedious.
- Less DM work. You can tailor encounters that are fun and play to your party's strengths, and you don't need to come up with XP rewards for everything.
- The party levels up when they need to. The DM decides when the party has gained enough experience to level up, which means the party doesn't have to go encounter-scumming to get those last few hundred XP needed to level up before they embark on the next adventure. Similarly the party won't get over-levelled by going out of their way to get XP!
If you still want to reward the players for completing the side-encounters you can reward them with items, clues or gold instead of XP.
In general, choosing where to place milestones is an art rather than a science.
If I'm running a homebrewed adventure or a sandbox campaign, I will usually use my "gut feeling" to decide when PCs have done enough to merit a level up, or use major character goals to help decide. For published adventures I will look through the book to see what levels the writers had in mind for each chapter. As for LMOP in particular you should be able to award one level per chapter, which I've based on the following:
- "allow them to advance their characters to 2nd level before continuing the adventure" p12 LMOP (end of Chapter 1)
- "At some point during part 2, the characters are likely to advance to 3rd level" p26 LMOP (end of Chapter 2)
- "This part of the adventure is designed for characters of at least 4th level" p42 LMOP (start of Chapter 4)
- "By the end of the adventure, the characters should be 5th level." p51 (Conclusion of Chapter 4)
answered yesterday
jambrothersjambrothers
40647
New contributor
jambrothers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to the rpg stack..? Seems you have been here a while actually. Excellent answer though. Good luck and happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Really nice answer (especially the reward part, don't know how I didn't manage to think of this). But the scenario doesn't have these milestones past the first chapter, so how could I define where are they ?
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
$begingroup$
That's really close to what OP said they don't want : "I might only give EXP for scripted encounters, but it might look a bit disappointing for players"
$endgroup$
– Pierre Cathé
yesterday
4
$begingroup$
@Zoma I've added a bit at the end to show where you could add milestones based on the adventure, I haven't ever played it all the way through so I can't offer personal experience specific to LMOP I'm afraid!
$endgroup$
– jambrothers
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@PierreCathé I don't think it's the same at all - OP would be giving EXP for no encounters, so the side encounters wouldn't be less rewarding (in that respect) than the main ones. This answer also suggests alternative rewards that can make the encounters feel worthwhile in and of themselves.
$endgroup$
– Andrzej Doyle
yesterday
|
show 6 more comments
$begingroup$
I'm going to challenge your premise a bit - why not drop XP-based levelling altogether and use milestone levelling instead? In my time as a DM and a player, I've found milestone has a few advantages:
- Less resource management. Counting all your XP is a bit tedious.
- Less DM work. You can tailor encounters that are fun and play to your party's strengths, and you don't need to come up with XP rewards for everything.
- The party levels up when they need to. The DM decides when the party has gained enough experience to level up, which means the party doesn't have to go encounter-scumming to get those last few hundred XP needed to level up before they embark on the next adventure. Similarly the party won't get over-levelled by going out of their way to get XP!
If you still want to reward the players for completing the side-encounters you can reward them with items, clues or gold instead of XP.
In general, choosing where to place milestones is an art rather than a science.
If I'm running a homebrewed adventure or a sandbox campaign, I will usually use my "gut feeling" to decide when PCs have done enough to merit a level up, or use major character goals to help decide. For published adventures I will look through the book to see what levels the writers had in mind for each chapter. As for LMOP in particular you should be able to award one level per chapter, which I've based on the following:
- "allow them to advance their characters to 2nd level before continuing the adventure" p12 LMOP (end of Chapter 1)
- "At some point during part 2, the characters are likely to advance to 3rd level" p26 LMOP (end of Chapter 2)
- "This part of the adventure is designed for characters of at least 4th level" p42 LMOP (start of Chapter 4)
- "By the end of the adventure, the characters should be 5th level." p51 (Conclusion of Chapter 4)
answered yesterday
jambrothersjambrothers
40647
New contributor
jambrothers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I'm going to challenge your premise a bit - why not drop XP-based levelling altogether and use milestone levelling instead? In my time as a DM and a player, I've found milestone has a few advantages:
- Less resource management. Counting all your XP is a bit tedious.
- Less DM work. You can tailor encounters that are fun and play to your party's strengths, and you don't need to come up with XP rewards for everything.
- The party levels up when they need to. The DM decides when the party has gained enough experience to level up, which means the party doesn't have to go encounter-scumming to get those last few hundred XP needed to level up before they embark on the next adventure. Similarly the party won't get over-levelled by going out of their way to get XP!
If you still want to reward the players for completing the side-encounters you can reward them with items, clues or gold instead of XP.
In general, choosing where to place milestones is an art rather than a science.
If I'm running a homebrewed adventure or a sandbox campaign, I will usually use my "gut feeling" to decide when PCs have done enough to merit a level up, or use major character goals to help decide. For published adventures I will look through the book to see what levels the writers had in mind for each chapter. As for LMOP in particular you should be able to award one level per chapter, which I've based on the following:
- "allow them to advance their characters to 2nd level before continuing the adventure" p12 LMOP (end of Chapter 1)
- "At some point during part 2, the characters are likely to advance to 3rd level" p26 LMOP (end of Chapter 2)
- "This part of the adventure is designed for characters of at least 4th level" p42 LMOP (start of Chapter 4)
- "By the end of the adventure, the characters should be 5th level." p51 (Conclusion of Chapter 4)
answered yesterday
jambrothersjambrothers
40647
New contributor
jambrothers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
jambrothersjambrothers
40647
New contributor
jambrothers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered yesterday
jambrothersjambrothers
40647
answered yesterday
jambrothersjambrothers
40647
40647
New contributor
jambrothers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
jambrothers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
jambrothers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to the rpg stack..? Seems you have been here a while actually. Excellent answer though. Good luck and happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Really nice answer (especially the reward part, don't know how I didn't manage to think of this). But the scenario doesn't have these milestones past the first chapter, so how could I define where are they ?
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
$begingroup$
That's really close to what OP said they don't want : "I might only give EXP for scripted encounters, but it might look a bit disappointing for players"
$endgroup$
– Pierre Cathé
yesterday
4
$begingroup$
@Zoma I've added a bit at the end to show where you could add milestones based on the adventure, I haven't ever played it all the way through so I can't offer personal experience specific to LMOP I'm afraid!
$endgroup$
– jambrothers
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@PierreCathé I don't think it's the same at all - OP would be giving EXP for no encounters, so the side encounters wouldn't be less rewarding (in that respect) than the main ones. This answer also suggests alternative rewards that can make the encounters feel worthwhile in and of themselves.
$endgroup$
– Andrzej Doyle
yesterday
|
show 6 more comments
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to the rpg stack..? Seems you have been here a while actually. Excellent answer though. Good luck and happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Really nice answer (especially the reward part, don't know how I didn't manage to think of this). But the scenario doesn't have these milestones past the first chapter, so how could I define where are they ?
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
$begingroup$
That's really close to what OP said they don't want : "I might only give EXP for scripted encounters, but it might look a bit disappointing for players"
$endgroup$
– Pierre Cathé
yesterday
4
$begingroup$
@Zoma I've added a bit at the end to show where you could add milestones based on the adventure, I haven't ever played it all the way through so I can't offer personal experience specific to LMOP I'm afraid!
$endgroup$
– jambrothers
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@PierreCathé I don't think it's the same at all - OP would be giving EXP for no encounters, so the side encounters wouldn't be less rewarding (in that respect) than the main ones. This answer also suggests alternative rewards that can make the encounters feel worthwhile in and of themselves.
$endgroup$
– Andrzej Doyle
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to the rpg stack..? Seems you have been here a while actually. Excellent answer though. Good luck and happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
yesterday
$begingroup$
Welcome to the rpg stack..? Seems you have been here a while actually. Excellent answer though. Good luck and happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
Really nice answer (especially the reward part, don't know how I didn't manage to think of this). But the scenario doesn't have these milestones past the first chapter, so how could I define where are they ?
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
$begingroup$
Really nice answer (especially the reward part, don't know how I didn't manage to think of this). But the scenario doesn't have these milestones past the first chapter, so how could I define where are they ?
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
$begingroup$
That's really close to what OP said they don't want : "I might only give EXP for scripted encounters, but it might look a bit disappointing for players"
$endgroup$
– Pierre Cathé
yesterday
$begingroup$
That's really close to what OP said they don't want : "I might only give EXP for scripted encounters, but it might look a bit disappointing for players"
$endgroup$
– Pierre Cathé
yesterday
4
4
$begingroup$
@Zoma I've added a bit at the end to show where you could add milestones based on the adventure, I haven't ever played it all the way through so I can't offer personal experience specific to LMOP I'm afraid!
$endgroup$
– jambrothers
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Zoma I've added a bit at the end to show where you could add milestones based on the adventure, I haven't ever played it all the way through so I can't offer personal experience specific to LMOP I'm afraid!
$endgroup$
– jambrothers
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
@PierreCathé I don't think it's the same at all - OP would be giving EXP for no encounters, so the side encounters wouldn't be less rewarding (in that respect) than the main ones. This answer also suggests alternative rewards that can make the encounters feel worthwhile in and of themselves.
$endgroup$
– Andrzej Doyle
yesterday
$begingroup$
@PierreCathé I don't think it's the same at all - OP would be giving EXP for no encounters, so the side encounters wouldn't be less rewarding (in that respect) than the main ones. This answer also suggests alternative rewards that can make the encounters feel worthwhile in and of themselves.
$endgroup$
– Andrzej Doyle
yesterday
|
show 6 more comments
$begingroup$
Make subsequent encounters harder
Disclaimer: this is based on my experience as a GM running my own adventures, not LMOP
It seems like you're afraid of giving your PCs too much power, allowing them to breeze through the end content of the module. This is a valid concern, as the players might get less engaged in the game. If you see that this is the case, then it is your prerogative (and duty) as the GM to make the later encounters harder.
If the encounters are too easy for your players (regardless of their level, as some players have better optimisation/tactics than others), there are several things you can do to make them tougher. Your adventure module should already contain some tips on how to make combat encounters harder, and as the GM you can do whatever you feel is right.
Options include (but are not restricted to):
- increase the number of enemies
- add some thematically appropriate foes
- tweak the stats of existing enemies to make them scarier
- add interesting terrain (pits, rubble, cover, whatever feels appropriate)
- use tactics beyond "hit closest PC"
answered yesterday
Pierre CathéPierre Cathé
2638
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
While this is a nice answer, my problem isn't that scripted encounter are too easy. I just want to add more encounters, not to make the scenario harder, but to add flavour for PCs who wants to explore a bit more than what the scenario expect. If that isn't evident in my question I can edit it. If you meant to say I should make additional encounters I could add harder, can you add more details on how make additional encounters harder could help me with EXP distribution ?
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@Zoma You say you fear the PCs gaining too much XP (which would make them stronger). What I am suggesting is you let them gain that extra XP and make the scripted encounters harder to account for that. I'll edit for clarity
$endgroup$
– Pierre Cathé
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Thanks for the edit, I didn't get what you meant, but it's much clearer and even more valuable with these precisions. I guess I'll ask my players what they do prefer and adopt the associated answer.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Make subsequent encounters harder
Disclaimer: this is based on my experience as a GM running my own adventures, not LMOP
It seems like you're afraid of giving your PCs too much power, allowing them to breeze through the end content of the module. This is a valid concern, as the players might get less engaged in the game. If you see that this is the case, then it is your prerogative (and duty) as the GM to make the later encounters harder.
If the encounters are too easy for your players (regardless of their level, as some players have better optimisation/tactics than others), there are several things you can do to make them tougher. Your adventure module should already contain some tips on how to make combat encounters harder, and as the GM you can do whatever you feel is right.
Options include (but are not restricted to):
- increase the number of enemies
- add some thematically appropriate foes
- tweak the stats of existing enemies to make them scarier
- add interesting terrain (pits, rubble, cover, whatever feels appropriate)
- use tactics beyond "hit closest PC"
answered yesterday
Pierre CathéPierre Cathé
2638
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
While this is a nice answer, my problem isn't that scripted encounter are too easy. I just want to add more encounters, not to make the scenario harder, but to add flavour for PCs who wants to explore a bit more than what the scenario expect. If that isn't evident in my question I can edit it. If you meant to say I should make additional encounters I could add harder, can you add more details on how make additional encounters harder could help me with EXP distribution ?
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@Zoma You say you fear the PCs gaining too much XP (which would make them stronger). What I am suggesting is you let them gain that extra XP and make the scripted encounters harder to account for that. I'll edit for clarity
$endgroup$
– Pierre Cathé
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Thanks for the edit, I didn't get what you meant, but it's much clearer and even more valuable with these precisions. I guess I'll ask my players what they do prefer and adopt the associated answer.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Make subsequent encounters harder
Disclaimer: this is based on my experience as a GM running my own adventures, not LMOP
It seems like you're afraid of giving your PCs too much power, allowing them to breeze through the end content of the module. This is a valid concern, as the players might get less engaged in the game. If you see that this is the case, then it is your prerogative (and duty) as the GM to make the later encounters harder.
If the encounters are too easy for your players (regardless of their level, as some players have better optimisation/tactics than others), there are several things you can do to make them tougher. Your adventure module should already contain some tips on how to make combat encounters harder, and as the GM you can do whatever you feel is right.
Options include (but are not restricted to):
- increase the number of enemies
- add some thematically appropriate foes
- tweak the stats of existing enemies to make them scarier
- add interesting terrain (pits, rubble, cover, whatever feels appropriate)
- use tactics beyond "hit closest PC"
answered yesterday
Pierre CathéPierre Cathé
2638
$endgroup$
Make subsequent encounters harder
Disclaimer: this is based on my experience as a GM running my own adventures, not LMOP
It seems like you're afraid of giving your PCs too much power, allowing them to breeze through the end content of the module. This is a valid concern, as the players might get less engaged in the game. If you see that this is the case, then it is your prerogative (and duty) as the GM to make the later encounters harder.
If the encounters are too easy for your players (regardless of their level, as some players have better optimisation/tactics than others), there are several things you can do to make them tougher. Your adventure module should already contain some tips on how to make combat encounters harder, and as the GM you can do whatever you feel is right.
Options include (but are not restricted to):
- increase the number of enemies
- add some thematically appropriate foes
- tweak the stats of existing enemies to make them scarier
- add interesting terrain (pits, rubble, cover, whatever feels appropriate)
- use tactics beyond "hit closest PC"
answered yesterday
Pierre CathéPierre Cathé
2638
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Pierre CathéPierre Cathé
2638
answered yesterday
Pierre CathéPierre Cathé
2638
answered yesterday
Pierre CathéPierre Cathé
2638
2638
$begingroup$
While this is a nice answer, my problem isn't that scripted encounter are too easy. I just want to add more encounters, not to make the scenario harder, but to add flavour for PCs who wants to explore a bit more than what the scenario expect. If that isn't evident in my question I can edit it. If you meant to say I should make additional encounters I could add harder, can you add more details on how make additional encounters harder could help me with EXP distribution ?
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@Zoma You say you fear the PCs gaining too much XP (which would make them stronger). What I am suggesting is you let them gain that extra XP and make the scripted encounters harder to account for that. I'll edit for clarity
$endgroup$
– Pierre Cathé
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Thanks for the edit, I didn't get what you meant, but it's much clearer and even more valuable with these precisions. I guess I'll ask my players what they do prefer and adopt the associated answer.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While this is a nice answer, my problem isn't that scripted encounter are too easy. I just want to add more encounters, not to make the scenario harder, but to add flavour for PCs who wants to explore a bit more than what the scenario expect. If that isn't evident in my question I can edit it. If you meant to say I should make additional encounters I could add harder, can you add more details on how make additional encounters harder could help me with EXP distribution ?
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@Zoma You say you fear the PCs gaining too much XP (which would make them stronger). What I am suggesting is you let them gain that extra XP and make the scripted encounters harder to account for that. I'll edit for clarity
$endgroup$
– Pierre Cathé
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Thanks for the edit, I didn't get what you meant, but it's much clearer and even more valuable with these precisions. I guess I'll ask my players what they do prefer and adopt the associated answer.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
$begingroup$
While this is a nice answer, my problem isn't that scripted encounter are too easy. I just want to add more encounters, not to make the scenario harder, but to add flavour for PCs who wants to explore a bit more than what the scenario expect. If that isn't evident in my question I can edit it. If you meant to say I should make additional encounters I could add harder, can you add more details on how make additional encounters harder could help me with EXP distribution ?
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
$begingroup$
While this is a nice answer, my problem isn't that scripted encounter are too easy. I just want to add more encounters, not to make the scenario harder, but to add flavour for PCs who wants to explore a bit more than what the scenario expect. If that isn't evident in my question I can edit it. If you meant to say I should make additional encounters I could add harder, can you add more details on how make additional encounters harder could help me with EXP distribution ?
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
@Zoma You say you fear the PCs gaining too much XP (which would make them stronger). What I am suggesting is you let them gain that extra XP and make the scripted encounters harder to account for that. I'll edit for clarity
$endgroup$
– Pierre Cathé
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Zoma You say you fear the PCs gaining too much XP (which would make them stronger). What I am suggesting is you let them gain that extra XP and make the scripted encounters harder to account for that. I'll edit for clarity
$endgroup$
– Pierre Cathé
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
Thanks for the edit, I didn't get what you meant, but it's much clearer and even more valuable with these precisions. I guess I'll ask my players what they do prefer and adopt the associated answer.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
$begingroup$
Thanks for the edit, I didn't get what you meant, but it's much clearer and even more valuable with these precisions. I guess I'll ask my players what they do prefer and adopt the associated answer.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145011%2fhow-can-i-add-encounters-in-the-lost-mine-of-phandelver-campaign-without-giving%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
If you decide to go with no XP for these extra encounters, just let the players know beforehand that you will be running things that way, and then make sure to provide other types of rewards for the encounter. That could be as simple as just a bit of extra cash, some unique equipment (not powerful, or magical, just memorable), or information that could make the next scripted encounter a bit easier.
$endgroup$
– Michael Richardson
yesterday
$begingroup$
@MichaelRichardson as I commented in both answers, I guess I'll just ask them which system they do prefer, then just use it so they'll be aware of it. For me both answers are a good way to deal with it, so I'd like to let players choose which one they prefer.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday
$begingroup$
Not an answer to the XP bit so I'll leave it as a comment: if you're concerned about the PCs trying to farm XP, just put them under some pressure. Players dawdling? letter from the Black Spider giving them N days to deliver some cash or he'll start killing the hostages (other motivations are available)
$endgroup$
– walrus
14 hours ago