What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally? The 2019 Stack Overflow...

What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

I could not break this equation. Please help me

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Make it rain characters

Can a relay be on for 16 hours continuously?

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

Can the DM override racial traits?

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?

How should I replace vector<uint8_t>::const_iterator in an API?

Change bounding box of math glyphs in LuaTeX

Can undead you have reanimated wait inside a portable hole?

University's motivation for having tenure-track positions

Relations between two reciprocal partial derivatives?

Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?

Python - Fishing Simulator

Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?

Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?

Scientific Reports - Significant Figures

Can the prologue be the backstory of your main character?

How do I add random spotting to the same face in cycles?

Take groceries in checked luggage



What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Solar shade act in CACan i have the police impound a car which is obstructing my driveway?Inherited property with two unknown lien holders. What should I do?Neighbor trees' shade impact solar panel production?can I submit a new insurance claim on roof damage after unpaid claim unrepairedParental rights and other legal implication of a marriage of convenience for a lesbian couple in MDWhat can I do about this tree?Can one claim unclaimed poultry living on their property?How can I buy a piece of land in Germany whose owner is unknown?Can a township be at fault for damaging property?I bought an apartment on plan and it doesn't seems to respect the acoustic standards. What can I do?












30















I live on a 2.5 acre lot. I installed a ground mount solar array 6 years ago. Then 4 years later my neighbor planted over 39 tall cypress trees which are blocking the sunlight. Is there any law in Maryland that protects the solar owner?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Elaine is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 30





    Do you have any proof that the trees were planted specifically to block your panels?

    – Greendrake
    yesterday






  • 10





    Also, the tree is there for two years already. Why did it only now become an issue?

    – Deduplicator
    yesterday






  • 18





    neighbor probably didn't want to have to look at solar panels, would rather see trees.

    – DavePhD
    yesterday






  • 5





    @DavePhD Seems like sound logic to me. I don't see anything wrong with what the neighbor did. I wouldn't want to look at a bunch of ugly solar panels either.

    – only_pro
    yesterday








  • 7





    @only_pro If that was the issue a shorter tree/bush would do just as well... What the OP describes seems more like a spite fence

    – Bakuriu
    yesterday
















30















I live on a 2.5 acre lot. I installed a ground mount solar array 6 years ago. Then 4 years later my neighbor planted over 39 tall cypress trees which are blocking the sunlight. Is there any law in Maryland that protects the solar owner?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Elaine is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 30





    Do you have any proof that the trees were planted specifically to block your panels?

    – Greendrake
    yesterday






  • 10





    Also, the tree is there for two years already. Why did it only now become an issue?

    – Deduplicator
    yesterday






  • 18





    neighbor probably didn't want to have to look at solar panels, would rather see trees.

    – DavePhD
    yesterday






  • 5





    @DavePhD Seems like sound logic to me. I don't see anything wrong with what the neighbor did. I wouldn't want to look at a bunch of ugly solar panels either.

    – only_pro
    yesterday








  • 7





    @only_pro If that was the issue a shorter tree/bush would do just as well... What the OP describes seems more like a spite fence

    – Bakuriu
    yesterday














30












30








30


2






I live on a 2.5 acre lot. I installed a ground mount solar array 6 years ago. Then 4 years later my neighbor planted over 39 tall cypress trees which are blocking the sunlight. Is there any law in Maryland that protects the solar owner?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Elaine is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I live on a 2.5 acre lot. I installed a ground mount solar array 6 years ago. Then 4 years later my neighbor planted over 39 tall cypress trees which are blocking the sunlight. Is there any law in Maryland that protects the solar owner?







property maryland






share|improve this question









New contributor




Elaine is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Elaine is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









feetwet

14.9k94498




14.9k94498






New contributor




Elaine is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









ElaineElaine

15423




15423




New contributor




Elaine is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Elaine is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Elaine is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 30





    Do you have any proof that the trees were planted specifically to block your panels?

    – Greendrake
    yesterday






  • 10





    Also, the tree is there for two years already. Why did it only now become an issue?

    – Deduplicator
    yesterday






  • 18





    neighbor probably didn't want to have to look at solar panels, would rather see trees.

    – DavePhD
    yesterday






  • 5





    @DavePhD Seems like sound logic to me. I don't see anything wrong with what the neighbor did. I wouldn't want to look at a bunch of ugly solar panels either.

    – only_pro
    yesterday








  • 7





    @only_pro If that was the issue a shorter tree/bush would do just as well... What the OP describes seems more like a spite fence

    – Bakuriu
    yesterday














  • 30





    Do you have any proof that the trees were planted specifically to block your panels?

    – Greendrake
    yesterday






  • 10





    Also, the tree is there for two years already. Why did it only now become an issue?

    – Deduplicator
    yesterday






  • 18





    neighbor probably didn't want to have to look at solar panels, would rather see trees.

    – DavePhD
    yesterday






  • 5





    @DavePhD Seems like sound logic to me. I don't see anything wrong with what the neighbor did. I wouldn't want to look at a bunch of ugly solar panels either.

    – only_pro
    yesterday








  • 7





    @only_pro If that was the issue a shorter tree/bush would do just as well... What the OP describes seems more like a spite fence

    – Bakuriu
    yesterday








30




30





Do you have any proof that the trees were planted specifically to block your panels?

– Greendrake
yesterday





Do you have any proof that the trees were planted specifically to block your panels?

– Greendrake
yesterday




10




10





Also, the tree is there for two years already. Why did it only now become an issue?

– Deduplicator
yesterday





Also, the tree is there for two years already. Why did it only now become an issue?

– Deduplicator
yesterday




18




18





neighbor probably didn't want to have to look at solar panels, would rather see trees.

– DavePhD
yesterday





neighbor probably didn't want to have to look at solar panels, would rather see trees.

– DavePhD
yesterday




5




5





@DavePhD Seems like sound logic to me. I don't see anything wrong with what the neighbor did. I wouldn't want to look at a bunch of ugly solar panels either.

– only_pro
yesterday







@DavePhD Seems like sound logic to me. I don't see anything wrong with what the neighbor did. I wouldn't want to look at a bunch of ugly solar panels either.

– only_pro
yesterday






7




7





@only_pro If that was the issue a shorter tree/bush would do just as well... What the OP describes seems more like a spite fence

– Bakuriu
yesterday





@only_pro If that was the issue a shorter tree/bush would do just as well... What the OP describes seems more like a spite fence

– Bakuriu
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















27














Maryland has no law requiring a neighbor to not plant / trim trees that might shade a solar panel (on the ground or on the roof). There are laws against deeds, declarations, covenants, contracts etc. (excepting registered historic properties) which prohibit of roof panels (e.g. as part of a HOA's rules). The law also recognizes the right to enter into an easement agreement, but that requires agreement by the neighbor. California has a law requiring tree trimming that would cover this case.






share|improve this answer





















  • 4





    "There are laws against legal prohibition of roof panels" Confused by the "legal" in here. What does it mean? Would "There are laws against prohibition of [solar] roof panels" be the same?

    – Azor Ahai
    yesterday






  • 2





    My reading of "laws against legal prohibition of X" is "laws against laws prohibiting X".

    – shoover
    yesterday











  • @shoover: So, constitutional restrictions, then?

    – Sean
    22 hours ago






  • 1





    @Sean: No, more like laws that make certain clauses in contracts unenforceable. For example, a condominium association can usually put legally binding restrictions on the sorts of improvements you make to your property; the law says that these restrictions can't prohibit you from installing solar panels.

    – Michael Seifert
    12 hours ago











  • @Sean: Also, you have to bear in mind that there are several different layers of laws here. The state, for example, can preempt or block county and municipal ordinances.

    – Kevin
    10 hours ago



















14














I am not a lawyer. I do not fully know of the current case law or climate of this type of law in Maryland. The cause of action you are looking for is private nuisance.



“Section 821D of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1979) defines a private nuisance as a nontrespassory invasion of another’s interest in the private use and enjoyment of land.” See Echard v. Kraft, part III (internal citations omitted).



“Nevertheless, not every interference with the use and enjoyment of land constitutes an actionable nuisance, inasmuch as the interference must be both substantial and unreasonable.” (Ibid)



The facts you have stated may be considered private nuisance, but generally I would think your case is on shaky grounds. To be successful this is not something you should delay in resolving in any way and you will definitely need to hire an attorney. The statue of limitations is generally 3 years so do not delay if you wish to bring a cause of action. After 3 years, you cannot do anything. You may still be able to bring a cause of action because you only realized the trees were a permanent condition two years ago. There are other reasons the statue of limitations may be overcome in this case, ie if temporary nuisance instead of permanent nuisance is established.



An attorney who has experience with this statue should assist you because there is a considerable amount of case law that needs to be evaluated to resolve the question of whether or not a suit should be brought. Additionally, an attorney may be helpful in evaluating if there are any other claims you could be successful in bringing.



I would definitely recommend against going to your neighbor and telling the neighbor you plan to sue him/her for nuisance and to fix the trees right now. Definitely do not file an action yourself as private nuisance seems to be very deferential to the defendant in Maryland and by hiring an attorney, the attorney representing you will be able to craft the best argument in favor of your claim.






share|improve this answer



















  • 11





    Seems a bit hard to argue you thought the trees were temporary.

    – Azor Ahai
    yesterday






  • 2





    Does the statute of limitations prohibit bringing a case where the cause of action began more than three years again, even if the cause of action still exists?

    – Acccumulation
    yesterday






  • 3





    @Acccumulation based on my brief reading of caselaw it seems to suggest that it does prohibit. I can provide a citation later today.

    – Viktor
    yesterday






  • 10





    @AzorAhai, you could reasonably argue that you didn't expect them to grow as tall as they did.

    – Mark
    yesterday






  • 1





    @Acccumulation here is a link to some caselaw on the issue you asked about: mdcourts.gov/data/opinions/coa/2013/75a12.pdf

    – Viktor
    20 hours ago










protected by feetwet yesterday



Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









27














Maryland has no law requiring a neighbor to not plant / trim trees that might shade a solar panel (on the ground or on the roof). There are laws against deeds, declarations, covenants, contracts etc. (excepting registered historic properties) which prohibit of roof panels (e.g. as part of a HOA's rules). The law also recognizes the right to enter into an easement agreement, but that requires agreement by the neighbor. California has a law requiring tree trimming that would cover this case.






share|improve this answer





















  • 4





    "There are laws against legal prohibition of roof panels" Confused by the "legal" in here. What does it mean? Would "There are laws against prohibition of [solar] roof panels" be the same?

    – Azor Ahai
    yesterday






  • 2





    My reading of "laws against legal prohibition of X" is "laws against laws prohibiting X".

    – shoover
    yesterday











  • @shoover: So, constitutional restrictions, then?

    – Sean
    22 hours ago






  • 1





    @Sean: No, more like laws that make certain clauses in contracts unenforceable. For example, a condominium association can usually put legally binding restrictions on the sorts of improvements you make to your property; the law says that these restrictions can't prohibit you from installing solar panels.

    – Michael Seifert
    12 hours ago











  • @Sean: Also, you have to bear in mind that there are several different layers of laws here. The state, for example, can preempt or block county and municipal ordinances.

    – Kevin
    10 hours ago
















27














Maryland has no law requiring a neighbor to not plant / trim trees that might shade a solar panel (on the ground or on the roof). There are laws against deeds, declarations, covenants, contracts etc. (excepting registered historic properties) which prohibit of roof panels (e.g. as part of a HOA's rules). The law also recognizes the right to enter into an easement agreement, but that requires agreement by the neighbor. California has a law requiring tree trimming that would cover this case.






share|improve this answer





















  • 4





    "There are laws against legal prohibition of roof panels" Confused by the "legal" in here. What does it mean? Would "There are laws against prohibition of [solar] roof panels" be the same?

    – Azor Ahai
    yesterday






  • 2





    My reading of "laws against legal prohibition of X" is "laws against laws prohibiting X".

    – shoover
    yesterday











  • @shoover: So, constitutional restrictions, then?

    – Sean
    22 hours ago






  • 1





    @Sean: No, more like laws that make certain clauses in contracts unenforceable. For example, a condominium association can usually put legally binding restrictions on the sorts of improvements you make to your property; the law says that these restrictions can't prohibit you from installing solar panels.

    – Michael Seifert
    12 hours ago











  • @Sean: Also, you have to bear in mind that there are several different layers of laws here. The state, for example, can preempt or block county and municipal ordinances.

    – Kevin
    10 hours ago














27












27








27







Maryland has no law requiring a neighbor to not plant / trim trees that might shade a solar panel (on the ground or on the roof). There are laws against deeds, declarations, covenants, contracts etc. (excepting registered historic properties) which prohibit of roof panels (e.g. as part of a HOA's rules). The law also recognizes the right to enter into an easement agreement, but that requires agreement by the neighbor. California has a law requiring tree trimming that would cover this case.






share|improve this answer















Maryland has no law requiring a neighbor to not plant / trim trees that might shade a solar panel (on the ground or on the roof). There are laws against deeds, declarations, covenants, contracts etc. (excepting registered historic properties) which prohibit of roof panels (e.g. as part of a HOA's rules). The law also recognizes the right to enter into an easement agreement, but that requires agreement by the neighbor. California has a law requiring tree trimming that would cover this case.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered 2 days ago









user6726user6726

62.6k457112




62.6k457112








  • 4





    "There are laws against legal prohibition of roof panels" Confused by the "legal" in here. What does it mean? Would "There are laws against prohibition of [solar] roof panels" be the same?

    – Azor Ahai
    yesterday






  • 2





    My reading of "laws against legal prohibition of X" is "laws against laws prohibiting X".

    – shoover
    yesterday











  • @shoover: So, constitutional restrictions, then?

    – Sean
    22 hours ago






  • 1





    @Sean: No, more like laws that make certain clauses in contracts unenforceable. For example, a condominium association can usually put legally binding restrictions on the sorts of improvements you make to your property; the law says that these restrictions can't prohibit you from installing solar panels.

    – Michael Seifert
    12 hours ago











  • @Sean: Also, you have to bear in mind that there are several different layers of laws here. The state, for example, can preempt or block county and municipal ordinances.

    – Kevin
    10 hours ago














  • 4





    "There are laws against legal prohibition of roof panels" Confused by the "legal" in here. What does it mean? Would "There are laws against prohibition of [solar] roof panels" be the same?

    – Azor Ahai
    yesterday






  • 2





    My reading of "laws against legal prohibition of X" is "laws against laws prohibiting X".

    – shoover
    yesterday











  • @shoover: So, constitutional restrictions, then?

    – Sean
    22 hours ago






  • 1





    @Sean: No, more like laws that make certain clauses in contracts unenforceable. For example, a condominium association can usually put legally binding restrictions on the sorts of improvements you make to your property; the law says that these restrictions can't prohibit you from installing solar panels.

    – Michael Seifert
    12 hours ago











  • @Sean: Also, you have to bear in mind that there are several different layers of laws here. The state, for example, can preempt or block county and municipal ordinances.

    – Kevin
    10 hours ago








4




4





"There are laws against legal prohibition of roof panels" Confused by the "legal" in here. What does it mean? Would "There are laws against prohibition of [solar] roof panels" be the same?

– Azor Ahai
yesterday





"There are laws against legal prohibition of roof panels" Confused by the "legal" in here. What does it mean? Would "There are laws against prohibition of [solar] roof panels" be the same?

– Azor Ahai
yesterday




2




2





My reading of "laws against legal prohibition of X" is "laws against laws prohibiting X".

– shoover
yesterday





My reading of "laws against legal prohibition of X" is "laws against laws prohibiting X".

– shoover
yesterday













@shoover: So, constitutional restrictions, then?

– Sean
22 hours ago





@shoover: So, constitutional restrictions, then?

– Sean
22 hours ago




1




1





@Sean: No, more like laws that make certain clauses in contracts unenforceable. For example, a condominium association can usually put legally binding restrictions on the sorts of improvements you make to your property; the law says that these restrictions can't prohibit you from installing solar panels.

– Michael Seifert
12 hours ago





@Sean: No, more like laws that make certain clauses in contracts unenforceable. For example, a condominium association can usually put legally binding restrictions on the sorts of improvements you make to your property; the law says that these restrictions can't prohibit you from installing solar panels.

– Michael Seifert
12 hours ago













@Sean: Also, you have to bear in mind that there are several different layers of laws here. The state, for example, can preempt or block county and municipal ordinances.

– Kevin
10 hours ago





@Sean: Also, you have to bear in mind that there are several different layers of laws here. The state, for example, can preempt or block county and municipal ordinances.

– Kevin
10 hours ago











14














I am not a lawyer. I do not fully know of the current case law or climate of this type of law in Maryland. The cause of action you are looking for is private nuisance.



“Section 821D of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1979) defines a private nuisance as a nontrespassory invasion of another’s interest in the private use and enjoyment of land.” See Echard v. Kraft, part III (internal citations omitted).



“Nevertheless, not every interference with the use and enjoyment of land constitutes an actionable nuisance, inasmuch as the interference must be both substantial and unreasonable.” (Ibid)



The facts you have stated may be considered private nuisance, but generally I would think your case is on shaky grounds. To be successful this is not something you should delay in resolving in any way and you will definitely need to hire an attorney. The statue of limitations is generally 3 years so do not delay if you wish to bring a cause of action. After 3 years, you cannot do anything. You may still be able to bring a cause of action because you only realized the trees were a permanent condition two years ago. There are other reasons the statue of limitations may be overcome in this case, ie if temporary nuisance instead of permanent nuisance is established.



An attorney who has experience with this statue should assist you because there is a considerable amount of case law that needs to be evaluated to resolve the question of whether or not a suit should be brought. Additionally, an attorney may be helpful in evaluating if there are any other claims you could be successful in bringing.



I would definitely recommend against going to your neighbor and telling the neighbor you plan to sue him/her for nuisance and to fix the trees right now. Definitely do not file an action yourself as private nuisance seems to be very deferential to the defendant in Maryland and by hiring an attorney, the attorney representing you will be able to craft the best argument in favor of your claim.






share|improve this answer



















  • 11





    Seems a bit hard to argue you thought the trees were temporary.

    – Azor Ahai
    yesterday






  • 2





    Does the statute of limitations prohibit bringing a case where the cause of action began more than three years again, even if the cause of action still exists?

    – Acccumulation
    yesterday






  • 3





    @Acccumulation based on my brief reading of caselaw it seems to suggest that it does prohibit. I can provide a citation later today.

    – Viktor
    yesterday






  • 10





    @AzorAhai, you could reasonably argue that you didn't expect them to grow as tall as they did.

    – Mark
    yesterday






  • 1





    @Acccumulation here is a link to some caselaw on the issue you asked about: mdcourts.gov/data/opinions/coa/2013/75a12.pdf

    – Viktor
    20 hours ago
















14














I am not a lawyer. I do not fully know of the current case law or climate of this type of law in Maryland. The cause of action you are looking for is private nuisance.



“Section 821D of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1979) defines a private nuisance as a nontrespassory invasion of another’s interest in the private use and enjoyment of land.” See Echard v. Kraft, part III (internal citations omitted).



“Nevertheless, not every interference with the use and enjoyment of land constitutes an actionable nuisance, inasmuch as the interference must be both substantial and unreasonable.” (Ibid)



The facts you have stated may be considered private nuisance, but generally I would think your case is on shaky grounds. To be successful this is not something you should delay in resolving in any way and you will definitely need to hire an attorney. The statue of limitations is generally 3 years so do not delay if you wish to bring a cause of action. After 3 years, you cannot do anything. You may still be able to bring a cause of action because you only realized the trees were a permanent condition two years ago. There are other reasons the statue of limitations may be overcome in this case, ie if temporary nuisance instead of permanent nuisance is established.



An attorney who has experience with this statue should assist you because there is a considerable amount of case law that needs to be evaluated to resolve the question of whether or not a suit should be brought. Additionally, an attorney may be helpful in evaluating if there are any other claims you could be successful in bringing.



I would definitely recommend against going to your neighbor and telling the neighbor you plan to sue him/her for nuisance and to fix the trees right now. Definitely do not file an action yourself as private nuisance seems to be very deferential to the defendant in Maryland and by hiring an attorney, the attorney representing you will be able to craft the best argument in favor of your claim.






share|improve this answer



















  • 11





    Seems a bit hard to argue you thought the trees were temporary.

    – Azor Ahai
    yesterday






  • 2





    Does the statute of limitations prohibit bringing a case where the cause of action began more than three years again, even if the cause of action still exists?

    – Acccumulation
    yesterday






  • 3





    @Acccumulation based on my brief reading of caselaw it seems to suggest that it does prohibit. I can provide a citation later today.

    – Viktor
    yesterday






  • 10





    @AzorAhai, you could reasonably argue that you didn't expect them to grow as tall as they did.

    – Mark
    yesterday






  • 1





    @Acccumulation here is a link to some caselaw on the issue you asked about: mdcourts.gov/data/opinions/coa/2013/75a12.pdf

    – Viktor
    20 hours ago














14












14








14







I am not a lawyer. I do not fully know of the current case law or climate of this type of law in Maryland. The cause of action you are looking for is private nuisance.



“Section 821D of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1979) defines a private nuisance as a nontrespassory invasion of another’s interest in the private use and enjoyment of land.” See Echard v. Kraft, part III (internal citations omitted).



“Nevertheless, not every interference with the use and enjoyment of land constitutes an actionable nuisance, inasmuch as the interference must be both substantial and unreasonable.” (Ibid)



The facts you have stated may be considered private nuisance, but generally I would think your case is on shaky grounds. To be successful this is not something you should delay in resolving in any way and you will definitely need to hire an attorney. The statue of limitations is generally 3 years so do not delay if you wish to bring a cause of action. After 3 years, you cannot do anything. You may still be able to bring a cause of action because you only realized the trees were a permanent condition two years ago. There are other reasons the statue of limitations may be overcome in this case, ie if temporary nuisance instead of permanent nuisance is established.



An attorney who has experience with this statue should assist you because there is a considerable amount of case law that needs to be evaluated to resolve the question of whether or not a suit should be brought. Additionally, an attorney may be helpful in evaluating if there are any other claims you could be successful in bringing.



I would definitely recommend against going to your neighbor and telling the neighbor you plan to sue him/her for nuisance and to fix the trees right now. Definitely do not file an action yourself as private nuisance seems to be very deferential to the defendant in Maryland and by hiring an attorney, the attorney representing you will be able to craft the best argument in favor of your claim.






share|improve this answer













I am not a lawyer. I do not fully know of the current case law or climate of this type of law in Maryland. The cause of action you are looking for is private nuisance.



“Section 821D of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1979) defines a private nuisance as a nontrespassory invasion of another’s interest in the private use and enjoyment of land.” See Echard v. Kraft, part III (internal citations omitted).



“Nevertheless, not every interference with the use and enjoyment of land constitutes an actionable nuisance, inasmuch as the interference must be both substantial and unreasonable.” (Ibid)



The facts you have stated may be considered private nuisance, but generally I would think your case is on shaky grounds. To be successful this is not something you should delay in resolving in any way and you will definitely need to hire an attorney. The statue of limitations is generally 3 years so do not delay if you wish to bring a cause of action. After 3 years, you cannot do anything. You may still be able to bring a cause of action because you only realized the trees were a permanent condition two years ago. There are other reasons the statue of limitations may be overcome in this case, ie if temporary nuisance instead of permanent nuisance is established.



An attorney who has experience with this statue should assist you because there is a considerable amount of case law that needs to be evaluated to resolve the question of whether or not a suit should be brought. Additionally, an attorney may be helpful in evaluating if there are any other claims you could be successful in bringing.



I would definitely recommend against going to your neighbor and telling the neighbor you plan to sue him/her for nuisance and to fix the trees right now. Definitely do not file an action yourself as private nuisance seems to be very deferential to the defendant in Maryland and by hiring an attorney, the attorney representing you will be able to craft the best argument in favor of your claim.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









ViktorViktor

2,1411626




2,1411626








  • 11





    Seems a bit hard to argue you thought the trees were temporary.

    – Azor Ahai
    yesterday






  • 2





    Does the statute of limitations prohibit bringing a case where the cause of action began more than three years again, even if the cause of action still exists?

    – Acccumulation
    yesterday






  • 3





    @Acccumulation based on my brief reading of caselaw it seems to suggest that it does prohibit. I can provide a citation later today.

    – Viktor
    yesterday






  • 10





    @AzorAhai, you could reasonably argue that you didn't expect them to grow as tall as they did.

    – Mark
    yesterday






  • 1





    @Acccumulation here is a link to some caselaw on the issue you asked about: mdcourts.gov/data/opinions/coa/2013/75a12.pdf

    – Viktor
    20 hours ago














  • 11





    Seems a bit hard to argue you thought the trees were temporary.

    – Azor Ahai
    yesterday






  • 2





    Does the statute of limitations prohibit bringing a case where the cause of action began more than three years again, even if the cause of action still exists?

    – Acccumulation
    yesterday






  • 3





    @Acccumulation based on my brief reading of caselaw it seems to suggest that it does prohibit. I can provide a citation later today.

    – Viktor
    yesterday






  • 10





    @AzorAhai, you could reasonably argue that you didn't expect them to grow as tall as they did.

    – Mark
    yesterday






  • 1





    @Acccumulation here is a link to some caselaw on the issue you asked about: mdcourts.gov/data/opinions/coa/2013/75a12.pdf

    – Viktor
    20 hours ago








11




11





Seems a bit hard to argue you thought the trees were temporary.

– Azor Ahai
yesterday





Seems a bit hard to argue you thought the trees were temporary.

– Azor Ahai
yesterday




2




2





Does the statute of limitations prohibit bringing a case where the cause of action began more than three years again, even if the cause of action still exists?

– Acccumulation
yesterday





Does the statute of limitations prohibit bringing a case where the cause of action began more than three years again, even if the cause of action still exists?

– Acccumulation
yesterday




3




3





@Acccumulation based on my brief reading of caselaw it seems to suggest that it does prohibit. I can provide a citation later today.

– Viktor
yesterday





@Acccumulation based on my brief reading of caselaw it seems to suggest that it does prohibit. I can provide a citation later today.

– Viktor
yesterday




10




10





@AzorAhai, you could reasonably argue that you didn't expect them to grow as tall as they did.

– Mark
yesterday





@AzorAhai, you could reasonably argue that you didn't expect them to grow as tall as they did.

– Mark
yesterday




1




1





@Acccumulation here is a link to some caselaw on the issue you asked about: mdcourts.gov/data/opinions/coa/2013/75a12.pdf

– Viktor
20 hours ago





@Acccumulation here is a link to some caselaw on the issue you asked about: mdcourts.gov/data/opinions/coa/2013/75a12.pdf

– Viktor
20 hours ago





protected by feetwet yesterday



Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



Popular posts from this blog

Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll? Announcing the arrival of...

Couldn't open a raw socket. Error: Permission denied (13) (nmap)Is it possible to run networking commands...

VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...