VMware Workstation 10 running slow WinXP Pro SP3 32-bit Announcing the arrival of Valued...
When is phishing education going too far?
Why does tar appear to skip file contents when output file is /dev/null?
Why is "Captain Marvel" translated as male in Portugal?
Antler Helmet: Can it work?
How to add zeros to reach same number of decimal places in tables?
Stars Make Stars
Communication vs. Technical skills ,which is more relevant for today's QA engineer positions?
Can't figure this one out.. What is the missing box?
Unable to start mainnet node docker container
I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign
Classification of bundles, Postnikov towers, obstruction theory, local coefficients
What kind of display is this?
Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?
Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?
Slither Like a Snake
Why is there no army of Iron-Mans in the MCU?
Replacing HDD with SSD; what about non-APFS/APFS?
Strange behaviour of Check
Simulating Exploding Dice
What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?
What is the electric potential inside a point charge?
Who can trigger ship-wide alerts in Star Trek?
Single author papers against my advisor's will?
Cold is to Refrigerator as warm is to?
VMware Workstation 10 running slow WinXP Pro SP3 32-bit
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)VMware workstation install problemProblems connecting to Windows Update from an XP3 VM inside VMWare Workstation 9 on W7 SP1 x64 bit hostVMware Workstation wont let me add memoryShared folders in VMware workstationHow do I bridge my internal wireless card to VMWare Workstation 10 guest and still isolate the host?VMWare Workstation slow network performanceVMware workstation occasionaly can't use all my physically memory?Deleting Snapshots from VMWare-VM (Workstation pro)VMware Workstation unstableVmWare Workstation 15 Pro limit number of cpus or cores used
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
Just recently jumped onto the VMware bandwagon.
Going to be using it mostly for games, especially old ones that don't run well on my host Win7 Ult.Ed 64-bit.
I've setup everything and everything seems to be working well.
My main problem stems from the fact that I'm not really sure what the Memory portion of the VMware Setup means, is this the Memory WinXp will use or VMware?
I built my PC with 32GB RAM and have set the Slider in VMware to only 4096MB, is this fine? I assumed 32-bit windows would only see 4GB so that influenced my choice. Should I have set the Memory higher? as I do not know if this slider is for the OS or VMware.
I graduated from VMware Player where I had set Memory to 3GB and I could have sworn things were opening and installing faster than it is in Workstation, The only things I increased were Cores 1 > 2, Memory 3GB > 4GB and HDD space 50GB > 100GB
Also I had VMware Player running on an internal SATA 3Gb/s connected Hard Disk Drive versus Workstation on a USB 3.0 external Drive, that clearly has more free space than the internal.
windows-7 windows-xp memory vmware-workstation
edited Feb 12 '16 at 8:03
Hennes
59.5k793144
asked Apr 30 '14 at 7:25
HyeVltg3HyeVltg3
2617
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
Just recently jumped onto the VMware bandwagon.
Going to be using it mostly for games, especially old ones that don't run well on my host Win7 Ult.Ed 64-bit.
I've setup everything and everything seems to be working well.
My main problem stems from the fact that I'm not really sure what the Memory portion of the VMware Setup means, is this the Memory WinXp will use or VMware?
I built my PC with 32GB RAM and have set the Slider in VMware to only 4096MB, is this fine? I assumed 32-bit windows would only see 4GB so that influenced my choice. Should I have set the Memory higher? as I do not know if this slider is for the OS or VMware.
I graduated from VMware Player where I had set Memory to 3GB and I could have sworn things were opening and installing faster than it is in Workstation, The only things I increased were Cores 1 > 2, Memory 3GB > 4GB and HDD space 50GB > 100GB
Also I had VMware Player running on an internal SATA 3Gb/s connected Hard Disk Drive versus Workstation on a USB 3.0 external Drive, that clearly has more free space than the internal.
windows-7 windows-xp memory vmware-workstation
edited Feb 12 '16 at 8:03
Hennes
59.5k793144
asked Apr 30 '14 at 7:25
HyeVltg3HyeVltg3
2617
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
Just recently jumped onto the VMware bandwagon.
Going to be using it mostly for games, especially old ones that don't run well on my host Win7 Ult.Ed 64-bit.
I've setup everything and everything seems to be working well.
My main problem stems from the fact that I'm not really sure what the Memory portion of the VMware Setup means, is this the Memory WinXp will use or VMware?
I built my PC with 32GB RAM and have set the Slider in VMware to only 4096MB, is this fine? I assumed 32-bit windows would only see 4GB so that influenced my choice. Should I have set the Memory higher? as I do not know if this slider is for the OS or VMware.
I graduated from VMware Player where I had set Memory to 3GB and I could have sworn things were opening and installing faster than it is in Workstation, The only things I increased were Cores 1 > 2, Memory 3GB > 4GB and HDD space 50GB > 100GB
Also I had VMware Player running on an internal SATA 3Gb/s connected Hard Disk Drive versus Workstation on a USB 3.0 external Drive, that clearly has more free space than the internal.
windows-7 windows-xp memory vmware-workstation
edited Feb 12 '16 at 8:03
Hennes
59.5k793144
asked Apr 30 '14 at 7:25
HyeVltg3HyeVltg3
2617
Just recently jumped onto the VMware bandwagon.
Going to be using it mostly for games, especially old ones that don't run well on my host Win7 Ult.Ed 64-bit.
I've setup everything and everything seems to be working well.
My main problem stems from the fact that I'm not really sure what the Memory portion of the VMware Setup means, is this the Memory WinXp will use or VMware?
I built my PC with 32GB RAM and have set the Slider in VMware to only 4096MB, is this fine? I assumed 32-bit windows would only see 4GB so that influenced my choice. Should I have set the Memory higher? as I do not know if this slider is for the OS or VMware.
I graduated from VMware Player where I had set Memory to 3GB and I could have sworn things were opening and installing faster than it is in Workstation, The only things I increased were Cores 1 > 2, Memory 3GB > 4GB and HDD space 50GB > 100GB
Also I had VMware Player running on an internal SATA 3Gb/s connected Hard Disk Drive versus Workstation on a USB 3.0 external Drive, that clearly has more free space than the internal.
windows-7 windows-xp memory vmware-workstation
windows-7 windows-xp memory vmware-workstation
edited Feb 12 '16 at 8:03
Hennes
59.5k793144
asked Apr 30 '14 at 7:25
HyeVltg3HyeVltg3
2617
edited Feb 12 '16 at 8:03
Hennes
59.5k793144
asked Apr 30 '14 at 7:25
HyeVltg3HyeVltg3
2617
edited Feb 12 '16 at 8:03
Hennes
59.5k793144
edited Feb 12 '16 at 8:03
Hennes
59.5k793144
edited Feb 12 '16 at 8:03
Hennes
59.5k793144
59.5k793144
asked Apr 30 '14 at 7:25
HyeVltg3HyeVltg3
2617
asked Apr 30 '14 at 7:25
HyeVltg3HyeVltg3
2617
asked Apr 30 '14 at 7:25
HyeVltg3HyeVltg3
2617
2617
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
I can't speak from experience with VMware. I only use Virtualbox. The memory setting is for the VM. You should be able to see this in the XP system settings. More than 4GB is useless I guess.
I wonder what the core setting will do. You use 2 now, of how many? What happens if you set this to 1 or higher? I think this is the biggest change with your previous setup.
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:34
SPRBRNSPRBRN
3,25174069
I'll test with 1 CPU / 1 Core and report back, I just looked at it like a Computer More cores = Faster computing. (obviously this isnt all true, just the basics)
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:52
Well that is the way it works, but if the host suffers, it may backfire.
– SPRBRN
Apr 30 '14 at 20:06
add a comment |
The hardware allocation, including memory, are resources you assign to the virtual machine. These resources become available to the VM when it is active and revert back to the host when the VM is down. The exception to this come when you allocated fixed HDD space (as opposed to dynamic). Unless someone knows otherwise I have used VMWare Player, Workstation and Virtualbox and this resource allocation is standard.
In your specific example a 4GB memory allocation against a Windows XP system should be plenty to run most standard games on that OS. If, as you suggest, you are running from a USB drive you will see a performance hit.
You didn't mention if it runs slow specifically when you run games and what graphical options you are running. You can check your system performance in task manager if you really want to inspect this deeper.
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:36
Matthew WilliamsMatthew Williams
4,02982136
Running slow, in general. Opening application, Installing are the two main noticeable places where I see the slowdown. The VM HDSK is located on a USB 3.0 Drive, I assume this is my problem?
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:49
@HyeVltg3 | The USB will give you some slowdown. The extent to which this is the problem would be difficult to say. If you can run this from your HDD it would speed it up.
– Matthew Williams
May 1 '14 at 10:33
add a comment |
Check your bios and see if the Hardware Virtualization is enabled.
for any machine you made right click on it and go to settings. these settings are related to that machine. you can set the memory from there. and in the processors panel you can check if HW Virtualization is enabled by vmware.
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:56
morTiemorTie
3451315
Thank you for mentioning the HW Virtulization in Bios, I was completely convinced I had set this to enable long ago, just rechecked now and it was disabled.
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:48
add a comment |
Newest update of Avast causes that problem also. To solve , disable hardware assisted virtualization at Settings / Troubleshooting
answered Nov 14 '17 at 6:33
halithalit
1
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f747843%2fvmware-workstation-10-running-slow-winxp-pro-sp3-32-bit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I can't speak from experience with VMware. I only use Virtualbox. The memory setting is for the VM. You should be able to see this in the XP system settings. More than 4GB is useless I guess.
I wonder what the core setting will do. You use 2 now, of how many? What happens if you set this to 1 or higher? I think this is the biggest change with your previous setup.
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:34
SPRBRNSPRBRN
3,25174069
I'll test with 1 CPU / 1 Core and report back, I just looked at it like a Computer More cores = Faster computing. (obviously this isnt all true, just the basics)
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:52
Well that is the way it works, but if the host suffers, it may backfire.
– SPRBRN
Apr 30 '14 at 20:06
add a comment |
I can't speak from experience with VMware. I only use Virtualbox. The memory setting is for the VM. You should be able to see this in the XP system settings. More than 4GB is useless I guess.
I wonder what the core setting will do. You use 2 now, of how many? What happens if you set this to 1 or higher? I think this is the biggest change with your previous setup.
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:34
SPRBRNSPRBRN
3,25174069
I'll test with 1 CPU / 1 Core and report back, I just looked at it like a Computer More cores = Faster computing. (obviously this isnt all true, just the basics)
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:52
Well that is the way it works, but if the host suffers, it may backfire.
– SPRBRN
Apr 30 '14 at 20:06
add a comment |
I can't speak from experience with VMware. I only use Virtualbox. The memory setting is for the VM. You should be able to see this in the XP system settings. More than 4GB is useless I guess.
I wonder what the core setting will do. You use 2 now, of how many? What happens if you set this to 1 or higher? I think this is the biggest change with your previous setup.
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:34
SPRBRNSPRBRN
3,25174069
I can't speak from experience with VMware. I only use Virtualbox. The memory setting is for the VM. You should be able to see this in the XP system settings. More than 4GB is useless I guess.
I wonder what the core setting will do. You use 2 now, of how many? What happens if you set this to 1 or higher? I think this is the biggest change with your previous setup.
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:34
SPRBRNSPRBRN
3,25174069
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:34
SPRBRNSPRBRN
3,25174069
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:34
SPRBRNSPRBRN
3,25174069
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:34
SPRBRNSPRBRN
3,25174069
3,25174069
I'll test with 1 CPU / 1 Core and report back, I just looked at it like a Computer More cores = Faster computing. (obviously this isnt all true, just the basics)
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:52
Well that is the way it works, but if the host suffers, it may backfire.
– SPRBRN
Apr 30 '14 at 20:06
add a comment |
I'll test with 1 CPU / 1 Core and report back, I just looked at it like a Computer More cores = Faster computing. (obviously this isnt all true, just the basics)
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:52
Well that is the way it works, but if the host suffers, it may backfire.
– SPRBRN
Apr 30 '14 at 20:06
I'll test with 1 CPU / 1 Core and report back, I just looked at it like a Computer More cores = Faster computing. (obviously this isnt all true, just the basics)
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:52
I'll test with 1 CPU / 1 Core and report back, I just looked at it like a Computer More cores = Faster computing. (obviously this isnt all true, just the basics)
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:52
Well that is the way it works, but if the host suffers, it may backfire.
– SPRBRN
Apr 30 '14 at 20:06
Well that is the way it works, but if the host suffers, it may backfire.
– SPRBRN
Apr 30 '14 at 20:06
add a comment |
The hardware allocation, including memory, are resources you assign to the virtual machine. These resources become available to the VM when it is active and revert back to the host when the VM is down. The exception to this come when you allocated fixed HDD space (as opposed to dynamic). Unless someone knows otherwise I have used VMWare Player, Workstation and Virtualbox and this resource allocation is standard.
In your specific example a 4GB memory allocation against a Windows XP system should be plenty to run most standard games on that OS. If, as you suggest, you are running from a USB drive you will see a performance hit.
You didn't mention if it runs slow specifically when you run games and what graphical options you are running. You can check your system performance in task manager if you really want to inspect this deeper.
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:36
Matthew WilliamsMatthew Williams
4,02982136
Running slow, in general. Opening application, Installing are the two main noticeable places where I see the slowdown. The VM HDSK is located on a USB 3.0 Drive, I assume this is my problem?
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:49
@HyeVltg3 | The USB will give you some slowdown. The extent to which this is the problem would be difficult to say. If you can run this from your HDD it would speed it up.
– Matthew Williams
May 1 '14 at 10:33
add a comment |
The hardware allocation, including memory, are resources you assign to the virtual machine. These resources become available to the VM when it is active and revert back to the host when the VM is down. The exception to this come when you allocated fixed HDD space (as opposed to dynamic). Unless someone knows otherwise I have used VMWare Player, Workstation and Virtualbox and this resource allocation is standard.
In your specific example a 4GB memory allocation against a Windows XP system should be plenty to run most standard games on that OS. If, as you suggest, you are running from a USB drive you will see a performance hit.
You didn't mention if it runs slow specifically when you run games and what graphical options you are running. You can check your system performance in task manager if you really want to inspect this deeper.
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:36
Matthew WilliamsMatthew Williams
4,02982136
Running slow, in general. Opening application, Installing are the two main noticeable places where I see the slowdown. The VM HDSK is located on a USB 3.0 Drive, I assume this is my problem?
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:49
@HyeVltg3 | The USB will give you some slowdown. The extent to which this is the problem would be difficult to say. If you can run this from your HDD it would speed it up.
– Matthew Williams
May 1 '14 at 10:33
add a comment |
The hardware allocation, including memory, are resources you assign to the virtual machine. These resources become available to the VM when it is active and revert back to the host when the VM is down. The exception to this come when you allocated fixed HDD space (as opposed to dynamic). Unless someone knows otherwise I have used VMWare Player, Workstation and Virtualbox and this resource allocation is standard.
In your specific example a 4GB memory allocation against a Windows XP system should be plenty to run most standard games on that OS. If, as you suggest, you are running from a USB drive you will see a performance hit.
You didn't mention if it runs slow specifically when you run games and what graphical options you are running. You can check your system performance in task manager if you really want to inspect this deeper.
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:36
Matthew WilliamsMatthew Williams
4,02982136
The hardware allocation, including memory, are resources you assign to the virtual machine. These resources become available to the VM when it is active and revert back to the host when the VM is down. The exception to this come when you allocated fixed HDD space (as opposed to dynamic). Unless someone knows otherwise I have used VMWare Player, Workstation and Virtualbox and this resource allocation is standard.
In your specific example a 4GB memory allocation against a Windows XP system should be plenty to run most standard games on that OS. If, as you suggest, you are running from a USB drive you will see a performance hit.
You didn't mention if it runs slow specifically when you run games and what graphical options you are running. You can check your system performance in task manager if you really want to inspect this deeper.
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:36
Matthew WilliamsMatthew Williams
4,02982136
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:36
Matthew WilliamsMatthew Williams
4,02982136
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:36
Matthew WilliamsMatthew Williams
4,02982136
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:36
Matthew WilliamsMatthew Williams
4,02982136
4,02982136
Running slow, in general. Opening application, Installing are the two main noticeable places where I see the slowdown. The VM HDSK is located on a USB 3.0 Drive, I assume this is my problem?
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:49
@HyeVltg3 | The USB will give you some slowdown. The extent to which this is the problem would be difficult to say. If you can run this from your HDD it would speed it up.
– Matthew Williams
May 1 '14 at 10:33
add a comment |
Running slow, in general. Opening application, Installing are the two main noticeable places where I see the slowdown. The VM HDSK is located on a USB 3.0 Drive, I assume this is my problem?
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:49
@HyeVltg3 | The USB will give you some slowdown. The extent to which this is the problem would be difficult to say. If you can run this from your HDD it would speed it up.
– Matthew Williams
May 1 '14 at 10:33
Running slow, in general. Opening application, Installing are the two main noticeable places where I see the slowdown. The VM HDSK is located on a USB 3.0 Drive, I assume this is my problem?
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:49
Running slow, in general. Opening application, Installing are the two main noticeable places where I see the slowdown. The VM HDSK is located on a USB 3.0 Drive, I assume this is my problem?
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:49
@HyeVltg3 | The USB will give you some slowdown. The extent to which this is the problem would be difficult to say. If you can run this from your HDD it would speed it up.
– Matthew Williams
May 1 '14 at 10:33
@HyeVltg3 | The USB will give you some slowdown. The extent to which this is the problem would be difficult to say. If you can run this from your HDD it would speed it up.
– Matthew Williams
May 1 '14 at 10:33
add a comment |
Check your bios and see if the Hardware Virtualization is enabled.
for any machine you made right click on it and go to settings. these settings are related to that machine. you can set the memory from there. and in the processors panel you can check if HW Virtualization is enabled by vmware.
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:56
morTiemorTie
3451315
Thank you for mentioning the HW Virtulization in Bios, I was completely convinced I had set this to enable long ago, just rechecked now and it was disabled.
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:48
add a comment |
Check your bios and see if the Hardware Virtualization is enabled.
for any machine you made right click on it and go to settings. these settings are related to that machine. you can set the memory from there. and in the processors panel you can check if HW Virtualization is enabled by vmware.
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:56
morTiemorTie
3451315
Thank you for mentioning the HW Virtulization in Bios, I was completely convinced I had set this to enable long ago, just rechecked now and it was disabled.
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:48
add a comment |
Check your bios and see if the Hardware Virtualization is enabled.
for any machine you made right click on it and go to settings. these settings are related to that machine. you can set the memory from there. and in the processors panel you can check if HW Virtualization is enabled by vmware.
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:56
morTiemorTie
3451315
Check your bios and see if the Hardware Virtualization is enabled.
for any machine you made right click on it and go to settings. these settings are related to that machine. you can set the memory from there. and in the processors panel you can check if HW Virtualization is enabled by vmware.
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:56
morTiemorTie
3451315
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:56
morTiemorTie
3451315
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:56
morTiemorTie
3451315
answered Apr 30 '14 at 7:56
morTiemorTie
3451315
3451315
Thank you for mentioning the HW Virtulization in Bios, I was completely convinced I had set this to enable long ago, just rechecked now and it was disabled.
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:48
add a comment |
Thank you for mentioning the HW Virtulization in Bios, I was completely convinced I had set this to enable long ago, just rechecked now and it was disabled.
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:48
Thank you for mentioning the HW Virtulization in Bios, I was completely convinced I had set this to enable long ago, just rechecked now and it was disabled.
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:48
Thank you for mentioning the HW Virtulization in Bios, I was completely convinced I had set this to enable long ago, just rechecked now and it was disabled.
– HyeVltg3
Apr 30 '14 at 19:48
add a comment |
Newest update of Avast causes that problem also. To solve , disable hardware assisted virtualization at Settings / Troubleshooting
answered Nov 14 '17 at 6:33
halithalit
1
add a comment |
Newest update of Avast causes that problem also. To solve , disable hardware assisted virtualization at Settings / Troubleshooting
answered Nov 14 '17 at 6:33
halithalit
1
add a comment |
Newest update of Avast causes that problem also. To solve , disable hardware assisted virtualization at Settings / Troubleshooting
answered Nov 14 '17 at 6:33
halithalit
1
Newest update of Avast causes that problem also. To solve , disable hardware assisted virtualization at Settings / Troubleshooting
answered Nov 14 '17 at 6:33
halithalit
1
answered Nov 14 '17 at 6:33
halithalit
1
answered Nov 14 '17 at 6:33
halithalit
1
answered Nov 14 '17 at 6:33
halithalit
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f747843%2fvmware-workstation-10-running-slow-winxp-pro-sp3-32-bit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
