How to remove these lines in Altium DesignPCB Design - Polygon pour remove islands or not?What are these...
How to verbalise code in Mathematica?
How would one muzzle a full grown polar bear in the 13th century?
Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?
Combinable filters
What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?
How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?
Why does processed meat contain preservatives, while canned fish needs not?
What's the polite way to say "I need to urinate"?
Are Boeing 737-800’s grounded?
How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?
How did Captain America manage to do this?
Mac Pro install disk keeps ejecting itself
Packing rectangles: Does rotation ever help?
US visa is under administrative processing, I need the passport back ASAP
A Note on N!
What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?
Why do games have consumables?
How to have a sharp product image?
Is there a way to get a compiler for the original B programming language?
Realistic Necromancy?
Does a semiconductor follow Ohm's law?
Meaning of Bloch representation
How to make a pipeline wait for end-of-file or stop after an error?
How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian?
How to remove these lines in Altium Design
PCB Design - Polygon pour remove islands or not?What are these double lines in Altium designer?Why do I get 'Unmatched Nets' in Altium and how do I remove them?Altium: remove some layerAltium: What are these vertical yellow linesHow to hide selected rats nest lines in Altium?altium dashed lines polygonAltium Remove Component Overlay but Leave Part Designator?Altium 17 hatched polygon problemRoom lines stills on my pcb and the top layers tracks are not displayed in 3D view, Altium
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
In my design, there are some lines with "=" on them. Can someone tell me why these lines appear and how to delete them? I'm using Altium18.
Thank you.
pcb pcb-design altium
asked yesterday
RossRoss
667
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my design, there are some lines with "=" on them. Can someone tell me why these lines appear and how to delete them? I'm using Altium18.
Thank you.
pcb pcb-design altium
asked yesterday
RossRoss
667
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my design, there are some lines with "=" on them. Can someone tell me why these lines appear and how to delete them? I'm using Altium18.
Thank you.
pcb pcb-design altium
asked yesterday
RossRoss
667
$endgroup$
In my design, there are some lines with "=" on them. Can someone tell me why these lines appear and how to delete them? I'm using Altium18.
Thank you.
pcb pcb-design altium
pcb pcb-design altium
asked yesterday
RossRoss
667
asked yesterday
RossRoss
667
asked yesterday
RossRoss
667
asked yesterday
RossRoss
667
asked yesterday
RossRoss
667
667
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Those lines are error markers that are there to show that the net is not connected with a trace in copper (open circuit).
From the Tools Menu, select "Reset Error Markers".
That should solve your issue
answered yesterday
ElmesitoElmesito
2,164313
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is one of the more annoying misfeatures of altium. Error markers for un-routed nets that are redundent with the rats nest lines and don't dissapear as you route the nets or move around as you move the components, they just stick where they are until you run the next design rule check.
As Elmesito says you can do a "reset error markers" but that will remove all violation markers.
You can also run a design rule check with "un-routed nets" unticked but then you won't get them in the report either. I'm not sure if there is a way to get it to include un-routed nets in the report but not to add those stupid redundent violation markers for them.
answered yesterday
Peter GreenPeter Green
12k12040
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Quick trick: if you want to check for un connected net, just press ALT and select over your whole board. This selects connections (unconnected)
answered 12 hours ago
Davide BortolamiDavide Bortolami
211
New contributor
Davide Bortolami is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f435526%2fhow-to-remove-these-lines-in-altium-design%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Those lines are error markers that are there to show that the net is not connected with a trace in copper (open circuit).
From the Tools Menu, select "Reset Error Markers".
That should solve your issue
answered yesterday
ElmesitoElmesito
2,164313
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Those lines are error markers that are there to show that the net is not connected with a trace in copper (open circuit).
From the Tools Menu, select "Reset Error Markers".
That should solve your issue
answered yesterday
ElmesitoElmesito
2,164313
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Those lines are error markers that are there to show that the net is not connected with a trace in copper (open circuit).
From the Tools Menu, select "Reset Error Markers".
That should solve your issue
answered yesterday
ElmesitoElmesito
2,164313
$endgroup$
Those lines are error markers that are there to show that the net is not connected with a trace in copper (open circuit).
From the Tools Menu, select "Reset Error Markers".
That should solve your issue
answered yesterday
ElmesitoElmesito
2,164313
answered yesterday
ElmesitoElmesito
2,164313
answered yesterday
ElmesitoElmesito
2,164313
answered yesterday
ElmesitoElmesito
2,164313
2,164313
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is one of the more annoying misfeatures of altium. Error markers for un-routed nets that are redundent with the rats nest lines and don't dissapear as you route the nets or move around as you move the components, they just stick where they are until you run the next design rule check.
As Elmesito says you can do a "reset error markers" but that will remove all violation markers.
You can also run a design rule check with "un-routed nets" unticked but then you won't get them in the report either. I'm not sure if there is a way to get it to include un-routed nets in the report but not to add those stupid redundent violation markers for them.
answered yesterday
Peter GreenPeter Green
12k12040
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is one of the more annoying misfeatures of altium. Error markers for un-routed nets that are redundent with the rats nest lines and don't dissapear as you route the nets or move around as you move the components, they just stick where they are until you run the next design rule check.
As Elmesito says you can do a "reset error markers" but that will remove all violation markers.
You can also run a design rule check with "un-routed nets" unticked but then you won't get them in the report either. I'm not sure if there is a way to get it to include un-routed nets in the report but not to add those stupid redundent violation markers for them.
answered yesterday
Peter GreenPeter Green
12k12040
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is one of the more annoying misfeatures of altium. Error markers for un-routed nets that are redundent with the rats nest lines and don't dissapear as you route the nets or move around as you move the components, they just stick where they are until you run the next design rule check.
As Elmesito says you can do a "reset error markers" but that will remove all violation markers.
You can also run a design rule check with "un-routed nets" unticked but then you won't get them in the report either. I'm not sure if there is a way to get it to include un-routed nets in the report but not to add those stupid redundent violation markers for them.
answered yesterday
Peter GreenPeter Green
12k12040
$endgroup$
This is one of the more annoying misfeatures of altium. Error markers for un-routed nets that are redundent with the rats nest lines and don't dissapear as you route the nets or move around as you move the components, they just stick where they are until you run the next design rule check.
As Elmesito says you can do a "reset error markers" but that will remove all violation markers.
You can also run a design rule check with "un-routed nets" unticked but then you won't get them in the report either. I'm not sure if there is a way to get it to include un-routed nets in the report but not to add those stupid redundent violation markers for them.
answered yesterday
Peter GreenPeter Green
12k12040
answered yesterday
Peter GreenPeter Green
12k12040
answered yesterday
Peter GreenPeter Green
12k12040
answered yesterday
Peter GreenPeter Green
12k12040
12k12040
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Quick trick: if you want to check for un connected net, just press ALT and select over your whole board. This selects connections (unconnected)
answered 12 hours ago
Davide BortolamiDavide Bortolami
211
New contributor
Davide Bortolami is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Quick trick: if you want to check for un connected net, just press ALT and select over your whole board. This selects connections (unconnected)
answered 12 hours ago
Davide BortolamiDavide Bortolami
211
New contributor
Davide Bortolami is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Quick trick: if you want to check for un connected net, just press ALT and select over your whole board. This selects connections (unconnected)
answered 12 hours ago
Davide BortolamiDavide Bortolami
211
New contributor
Davide Bortolami is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Quick trick: if you want to check for un connected net, just press ALT and select over your whole board. This selects connections (unconnected)
answered 12 hours ago
Davide BortolamiDavide Bortolami
211
New contributor
Davide Bortolami is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 12 hours ago
Davide BortolamiDavide Bortolami
211
New contributor
Davide Bortolami is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 12 hours ago
Davide BortolamiDavide Bortolami
211
answered 12 hours ago
Davide BortolamiDavide Bortolami
211
211
New contributor
Davide Bortolami is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Davide Bortolami is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Davide Bortolami is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f435526%2fhow-to-remove-these-lines-in-altium-design%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
