Why is the underscore command _ useful?Using the % command on a line without a bracketApplying an ex command...

Why other Westeros houses don't use wildfire?

Don’t seats that recline flat defeat the purpose of having seatbelts?

How can I place the product on a social media post better?

What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?

What is the difference between `command a[bc]d` and `command `a{b,c}d`

Controversial area of mathematics

Noun clause (singular all the time?)

How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?

How to creep the reader out with what seems like a normal person?

What is Niska's accent?

What are the real rules for choosing between the simple past and past perfect when both actions are in the past?

How would one muzzle a full grown polar bear in the 13th century?

Can someone publish a story that happened to you?

What was the first Intel x86 processor with "Base + Index * Scale + Displacement" addressing mode?

Do I have an "anti-research" personality?

How to get a plain text file version of a CP/M .BAS (M-BASIC) program?

How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian?

What does the "ep" capability mean?

How to have a sharp product image?

Realistic Necromancy?

US visa is under administrative processing, I need the passport back ASAP

Will a top journal at least read my introduction?

Packing rectangles: Does rotation ever help?

French for 'It must be my imagination'?



Why is the underscore command _ useful?


Using the % command on a line without a bracketApplying an ex command to a visual selection or text objectWhy do `cw` and `ce` do the same thing?What does vim consider a paragragh?Why does >3k move the cursor up when >3j does not move it down?how to delete a paragraph respecting the folds?How to change f{char} to search left if no char was found searching right?How to make f{char} case insensitive?Why is :execute required in this --remote-silent command?Automatically jump to text object during `ci(`













12















I'm a bit puzzeled as to why the underscore command _, which jumps to
the beginning of the (COUNT - 1)th line below the cursor, gets its own
key. When would I use this rather than + or ^?










share|improve this question





























    12















    I'm a bit puzzeled as to why the underscore command _, which jumps to
    the beginning of the (COUNT - 1)th line below the cursor, gets its own
    key. When would I use this rather than + or ^?










    share|improve this question



























      12












      12








      12








      I'm a bit puzzeled as to why the underscore command _, which jumps to
      the beginning of the (COUNT - 1)th line below the cursor, gets its own
      key. When would I use this rather than + or ^?










      share|improve this question
















      I'm a bit puzzeled as to why the underscore command _, which jumps to
      the beginning of the (COUNT - 1)th line below the cursor, gets its own
      key. When would I use this rather than + or ^?







      cursor-motions






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago







      Toothrot

















      asked 2 days ago









      ToothrotToothrot

      1,531519




      1,531519






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          14














          Good question!



          As a motion by itself, you're right, _ is not a particularly useful key. :h _



                                      *_*
          _ <underscore> [count] - 1 lines downward, on the first non-blank
          character |linewise|.


          The key word here is "linewise". So if your goal is to just move the cursor, then ^, j, and + all get the job done, and there's not much point to _. But as an argument to an operator, _ is super powerful.



          A lot of double-key shortcuts are actually just shortcuts for _. For example,



          dd -> d_
          cc -> c_
          yy -> y_
          Y -> y_


          etc. Because it's a linewise motion, it basically selects the entire line to be operated on regardless of where your cursor starts, whereas ^ just goes from your character to the first non-blank.



          It helps me when thinking about linewise vs blockwise motions to imagine that I'm pressing either v or V right before the motion. So I imagine d^ to be equivalent to v^d and I imagine d_ to be equivalent to V_d or V^d. Of course, you can also override a motion to force it to be linewise or characterwise. So dv_ is actually exactly the same as d^ or v^d, and dVw is like Vwd which is exactly like d_.



          The reason it is specifically the "count-1th" line is so that 1dd (which is really d1_) deletes one entire line, 2dd (which is really d2_) deletes 2 entire lines, 3dd deletes 3 entire lines, etc.






          share|improve this answer
























          • All right, but would I ever actually use it? dd is easier than d_ and 3yj is easier than 4y_.

            – Toothrot
            2 days ago






          • 4





            @toothrot If you were creating your own operator and wanted to operate on the next n lines.

            – DJMcMayhem
            2 days ago






          • 4





            @Toothrot I guess I want to clarify that a little bit. In day to day vim editing, no it's really not particularly useful. I've almost never used it either. The reason it's useful is because it is the definition of a lot of useful commands. dd might be more convenient than d_, but that's because dd is just a mapping to d_. And it's also useful in vimscript.

            – DJMcMayhem
            2 days ago






          • 8





            Some actions that act on a "motion" may not have other shortcuts. Something like "gU_" will uppercase everything on the current line, even if the cursor is not at the start of the line.

            – bmb
            2 days ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "599"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fvi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f19745%2fwhy-is-the-underscore-command-useful%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          14














          Good question!



          As a motion by itself, you're right, _ is not a particularly useful key. :h _



                                      *_*
          _ <underscore> [count] - 1 lines downward, on the first non-blank
          character |linewise|.


          The key word here is "linewise". So if your goal is to just move the cursor, then ^, j, and + all get the job done, and there's not much point to _. But as an argument to an operator, _ is super powerful.



          A lot of double-key shortcuts are actually just shortcuts for _. For example,



          dd -> d_
          cc -> c_
          yy -> y_
          Y -> y_


          etc. Because it's a linewise motion, it basically selects the entire line to be operated on regardless of where your cursor starts, whereas ^ just goes from your character to the first non-blank.



          It helps me when thinking about linewise vs blockwise motions to imagine that I'm pressing either v or V right before the motion. So I imagine d^ to be equivalent to v^d and I imagine d_ to be equivalent to V_d or V^d. Of course, you can also override a motion to force it to be linewise or characterwise. So dv_ is actually exactly the same as d^ or v^d, and dVw is like Vwd which is exactly like d_.



          The reason it is specifically the "count-1th" line is so that 1dd (which is really d1_) deletes one entire line, 2dd (which is really d2_) deletes 2 entire lines, 3dd deletes 3 entire lines, etc.






          share|improve this answer
























          • All right, but would I ever actually use it? dd is easier than d_ and 3yj is easier than 4y_.

            – Toothrot
            2 days ago






          • 4





            @toothrot If you were creating your own operator and wanted to operate on the next n lines.

            – DJMcMayhem
            2 days ago






          • 4





            @Toothrot I guess I want to clarify that a little bit. In day to day vim editing, no it's really not particularly useful. I've almost never used it either. The reason it's useful is because it is the definition of a lot of useful commands. dd might be more convenient than d_, but that's because dd is just a mapping to d_. And it's also useful in vimscript.

            – DJMcMayhem
            2 days ago






          • 8





            Some actions that act on a "motion" may not have other shortcuts. Something like "gU_" will uppercase everything on the current line, even if the cursor is not at the start of the line.

            – bmb
            2 days ago
















          14














          Good question!



          As a motion by itself, you're right, _ is not a particularly useful key. :h _



                                      *_*
          _ <underscore> [count] - 1 lines downward, on the first non-blank
          character |linewise|.


          The key word here is "linewise". So if your goal is to just move the cursor, then ^, j, and + all get the job done, and there's not much point to _. But as an argument to an operator, _ is super powerful.



          A lot of double-key shortcuts are actually just shortcuts for _. For example,



          dd -> d_
          cc -> c_
          yy -> y_
          Y -> y_


          etc. Because it's a linewise motion, it basically selects the entire line to be operated on regardless of where your cursor starts, whereas ^ just goes from your character to the first non-blank.



          It helps me when thinking about linewise vs blockwise motions to imagine that I'm pressing either v or V right before the motion. So I imagine d^ to be equivalent to v^d and I imagine d_ to be equivalent to V_d or V^d. Of course, you can also override a motion to force it to be linewise or characterwise. So dv_ is actually exactly the same as d^ or v^d, and dVw is like Vwd which is exactly like d_.



          The reason it is specifically the "count-1th" line is so that 1dd (which is really d1_) deletes one entire line, 2dd (which is really d2_) deletes 2 entire lines, 3dd deletes 3 entire lines, etc.






          share|improve this answer
























          • All right, but would I ever actually use it? dd is easier than d_ and 3yj is easier than 4y_.

            – Toothrot
            2 days ago






          • 4





            @toothrot If you were creating your own operator and wanted to operate on the next n lines.

            – DJMcMayhem
            2 days ago






          • 4





            @Toothrot I guess I want to clarify that a little bit. In day to day vim editing, no it's really not particularly useful. I've almost never used it either. The reason it's useful is because it is the definition of a lot of useful commands. dd might be more convenient than d_, but that's because dd is just a mapping to d_. And it's also useful in vimscript.

            – DJMcMayhem
            2 days ago






          • 8





            Some actions that act on a "motion" may not have other shortcuts. Something like "gU_" will uppercase everything on the current line, even if the cursor is not at the start of the line.

            – bmb
            2 days ago














          14












          14








          14







          Good question!



          As a motion by itself, you're right, _ is not a particularly useful key. :h _



                                      *_*
          _ <underscore> [count] - 1 lines downward, on the first non-blank
          character |linewise|.


          The key word here is "linewise". So if your goal is to just move the cursor, then ^, j, and + all get the job done, and there's not much point to _. But as an argument to an operator, _ is super powerful.



          A lot of double-key shortcuts are actually just shortcuts for _. For example,



          dd -> d_
          cc -> c_
          yy -> y_
          Y -> y_


          etc. Because it's a linewise motion, it basically selects the entire line to be operated on regardless of where your cursor starts, whereas ^ just goes from your character to the first non-blank.



          It helps me when thinking about linewise vs blockwise motions to imagine that I'm pressing either v or V right before the motion. So I imagine d^ to be equivalent to v^d and I imagine d_ to be equivalent to V_d or V^d. Of course, you can also override a motion to force it to be linewise or characterwise. So dv_ is actually exactly the same as d^ or v^d, and dVw is like Vwd which is exactly like d_.



          The reason it is specifically the "count-1th" line is so that 1dd (which is really d1_) deletes one entire line, 2dd (which is really d2_) deletes 2 entire lines, 3dd deletes 3 entire lines, etc.






          share|improve this answer













          Good question!



          As a motion by itself, you're right, _ is not a particularly useful key. :h _



                                      *_*
          _ <underscore> [count] - 1 lines downward, on the first non-blank
          character |linewise|.


          The key word here is "linewise". So if your goal is to just move the cursor, then ^, j, and + all get the job done, and there's not much point to _. But as an argument to an operator, _ is super powerful.



          A lot of double-key shortcuts are actually just shortcuts for _. For example,



          dd -> d_
          cc -> c_
          yy -> y_
          Y -> y_


          etc. Because it's a linewise motion, it basically selects the entire line to be operated on regardless of where your cursor starts, whereas ^ just goes from your character to the first non-blank.



          It helps me when thinking about linewise vs blockwise motions to imagine that I'm pressing either v or V right before the motion. So I imagine d^ to be equivalent to v^d and I imagine d_ to be equivalent to V_d or V^d. Of course, you can also override a motion to force it to be linewise or characterwise. So dv_ is actually exactly the same as d^ or v^d, and dVw is like Vwd which is exactly like d_.



          The reason it is specifically the "count-1th" line is so that 1dd (which is really d1_) deletes one entire line, 2dd (which is really d2_) deletes 2 entire lines, 3dd deletes 3 entire lines, etc.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          DJMcMayhemDJMcMayhem

          11.5k12963




          11.5k12963













          • All right, but would I ever actually use it? dd is easier than d_ and 3yj is easier than 4y_.

            – Toothrot
            2 days ago






          • 4





            @toothrot If you were creating your own operator and wanted to operate on the next n lines.

            – DJMcMayhem
            2 days ago






          • 4





            @Toothrot I guess I want to clarify that a little bit. In day to day vim editing, no it's really not particularly useful. I've almost never used it either. The reason it's useful is because it is the definition of a lot of useful commands. dd might be more convenient than d_, but that's because dd is just a mapping to d_. And it's also useful in vimscript.

            – DJMcMayhem
            2 days ago






          • 8





            Some actions that act on a "motion" may not have other shortcuts. Something like "gU_" will uppercase everything on the current line, even if the cursor is not at the start of the line.

            – bmb
            2 days ago



















          • All right, but would I ever actually use it? dd is easier than d_ and 3yj is easier than 4y_.

            – Toothrot
            2 days ago






          • 4





            @toothrot If you were creating your own operator and wanted to operate on the next n lines.

            – DJMcMayhem
            2 days ago






          • 4





            @Toothrot I guess I want to clarify that a little bit. In day to day vim editing, no it's really not particularly useful. I've almost never used it either. The reason it's useful is because it is the definition of a lot of useful commands. dd might be more convenient than d_, but that's because dd is just a mapping to d_. And it's also useful in vimscript.

            – DJMcMayhem
            2 days ago






          • 8





            Some actions that act on a "motion" may not have other shortcuts. Something like "gU_" will uppercase everything on the current line, even if the cursor is not at the start of the line.

            – bmb
            2 days ago

















          All right, but would I ever actually use it? dd is easier than d_ and 3yj is easier than 4y_.

          – Toothrot
          2 days ago





          All right, but would I ever actually use it? dd is easier than d_ and 3yj is easier than 4y_.

          – Toothrot
          2 days ago




          4




          4





          @toothrot If you were creating your own operator and wanted to operate on the next n lines.

          – DJMcMayhem
          2 days ago





          @toothrot If you were creating your own operator and wanted to operate on the next n lines.

          – DJMcMayhem
          2 days ago




          4




          4





          @Toothrot I guess I want to clarify that a little bit. In day to day vim editing, no it's really not particularly useful. I've almost never used it either. The reason it's useful is because it is the definition of a lot of useful commands. dd might be more convenient than d_, but that's because dd is just a mapping to d_. And it's also useful in vimscript.

          – DJMcMayhem
          2 days ago





          @Toothrot I guess I want to clarify that a little bit. In day to day vim editing, no it's really not particularly useful. I've almost never used it either. The reason it's useful is because it is the definition of a lot of useful commands. dd might be more convenient than d_, but that's because dd is just a mapping to d_. And it's also useful in vimscript.

          – DJMcMayhem
          2 days ago




          8




          8





          Some actions that act on a "motion" may not have other shortcuts. Something like "gU_" will uppercase everything on the current line, even if the cursor is not at the start of the line.

          – bmb
          2 days ago





          Some actions that act on a "motion" may not have other shortcuts. Something like "gU_" will uppercase everything on the current line, even if the cursor is not at the start of the line.

          – bmb
          2 days ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Vi and Vim Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fvi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f19745%2fwhy-is-the-underscore-command-useful%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll? Announcing the arrival of...

          Couldn't open a raw socket. Error: Permission denied (13) (nmap)Is it possible to run networking commands...

          VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...