Is there a word for the censored part of a video?Is there a name for the part before the theme song in a tv...
Error message with tabularx
Is the claim "Employers won't employ people with no 'social media presence'" realistic?
Why was the Spitfire's elliptical wing almost uncopied by other aircraft of World War 2?
Why do games have consumables?
What does it mean to express a gate in Dirac notation?
Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?
Meaning of Bloch representation
How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?
what is the sudo password for a --disabled-password user
Mac Pro install disk keep ejecting itself please help
How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?
Realistic Necromancy?
What is the strongest case that can be made in favour of the UK regaining some control over fishing policy after Brexit?
Is it possible to determine the symmetric encryption method used by output size?
Is there a way to get a compiler for the original B programming language?
How to solve constants out of the internal energy equation?
Do I have to worry about players making “bad” choices on level up?
Please, smoke with good manners
How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?
What is the relationship between spectral sequences and obstruction theory?
The Defining Moment
Which big number is bigger?
What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?
How to pronounce 'C++' in Spanish
Is there a word for the censored part of a video?
Is there a name for the part before the theme song in a tv series?Word for a person who speaks in a videoIs there a word for the definition of an event?Is there a word for “sitting with the legs crossed”?Is there a word for this condition?Is there any word for “re-act?”The proper phrase for video destinationIs there a word for “be popular for a time”?Word for a video of a musical performance?Is there a word for “divulging unintentionally”?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
Sometimes, TV shows censor people's faces with pixels that hide the details, I am wondering if there's a noun for that, because I am trying to say something in an idiomatic way, but I find it hard without being able to refer to it.
For example, look at this sentence:
They removed the censored part, thereby showing the face of the
person who decided to speak in anonymity.
Censored part sounds odd in this context, so is there a better alternative?
word-request
New contributor
add a comment |
Sometimes, TV shows censor people's faces with pixels that hide the details, I am wondering if there's a noun for that, because I am trying to say something in an idiomatic way, but I find it hard without being able to refer to it.
For example, look at this sentence:
They removed the censored part, thereby showing the face of the
person who decided to speak in anonymity.
Censored part sounds odd in this context, so is there a better alternative?
word-request
New contributor
add a comment |
Sometimes, TV shows censor people's faces with pixels that hide the details, I am wondering if there's a noun for that, because I am trying to say something in an idiomatic way, but I find it hard without being able to refer to it.
For example, look at this sentence:
They removed the censored part, thereby showing the face of the
person who decided to speak in anonymity.
Censored part sounds odd in this context, so is there a better alternative?
word-request
New contributor
Sometimes, TV shows censor people's faces with pixels that hide the details, I am wondering if there's a noun for that, because I am trying to say something in an idiomatic way, but I find it hard without being able to refer to it.
For example, look at this sentence:
They removed the censored part, thereby showing the face of the
person who decided to speak in anonymity.
Censored part sounds odd in this context, so is there a better alternative?
word-request
word-request
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
blackbirdblackbird
41226
41226
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
When it's done as pixels, we use pixelated and pixelation.
You can write:
- They removed the pixelation, thereby showing the face of the person who decided to speak in anonymity.
Wikipedia gives "pixelization", but pixelate appears more common.
Many will write "pixelated" even when it would be more correct to use another word (eg I News referring to a blurred image as "pixelated"):
blurred out (if the image is made blurry)
blacked out (made black)
blanked out (made black or white)- blocked out
masked out (any kind of blurring/rectangle/pixelation which prevents you seeing the face)
So you can have
- They removed the blurring, thereby showing the face ...
If it is actually censorship and not privacy, you can also write
- The removed the censoring/censorship, thereby showing the offensive symbol
Very occasionally you see redaction bar Guardian which would be appropriate for both privacy and censorship. You could certainly write
- They removed the redaction, thereby showing the face ...
"Redaction" is quite a formal word.
New contributor
1
Similarly you could say "They uncensored the video, showing their face/the symbol/etc..."
– BruceWayne
yesterday
Pixelation cannot be "removed". You have to get your hands on an original copy.
– Mazura
yesterday
@Mazura "Remove the pixelation" is something you'd hear in an edit or suite or broadcast unit, just as you might hear "Remove the subtitles". Of course I agree with you that you can't take the pixelated or subtitled image and recreate the raw image, but certainly people use "Remove X" to mean "Don't add X".
– jonathanjo
yesterday
add a comment |
You ask if there's a noun for it. There is: pixelation.
So you could say
They removed the pixelation from the face of ... .
You could also use unpixelate or depixelate:
They unpixelated the face of the person ... .
or
They depixelated the face of the person ... .
or
They deobfuscated the face of the person ... .
Of course, you can say unpixelated the video, unpixelated that portion of the video that had obscured the face of ... . Etc.
You can search online and find many examples of unpixelate and depixelate.
add a comment |
That type of censoring is called "pixelation" or "mosaic", so you can say "They removed the censoring mosaic...". Or you could just say "they removed the censorship..."
The "censored part" would refer not to the mosaic, but to the face that was being hidden, or possibly the section of the video that contained censoring. This would not reveal the face that had been hidden.
Note that hiding faces in this way is usually about privacy, not censorship
1
If they "removed the censored part", then they just cut out every part of the video that had [word OP is asking for] in it.
– Mazura
yesterday
add a comment |
better alternative: uncensored
Removing a censor is pretty much impossible; the data is lost. Likely what you have is the original uncensored video.
They
removed the censored partreleased the uncensored video which shows the face of a person who had requested anonymity, which was previously obfuscated through the use of [words in the other answers].
obfuscated
isn't really normal usage here; no-on else has mentionedmasked
which would work better.
– Mike Brockington
yesterday
>To obfuscate something means to make it so that it isn't clear or transparent, much like dirty water makes it hard to see to the bottom of a pond. The verb shares its ob- root (meaning "over, completely") with obscure, another word that can refer to the act of concealing something or making it more difficult to see or understand. The rest of obfuscate comes from Latin fuscus, which means "dark brown" and is distantly related to our word dusk. – MW
– Mazura
yesterday
@MikeBrockington - I suspect you feel that way because you're a programmer. In A/V it's probably called a mask. In layman's terms, hidden would be the best bet in place of obfuscated. As a learner, I might just wonder what sort of tech you have that can remove a 'mask' that they're wearing and digitally reconstruct someone's face.
– Mazura
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
blackbird is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208083%2fis-there-a-word-for-the-censored-part-of-a-video%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
When it's done as pixels, we use pixelated and pixelation.
You can write:
- They removed the pixelation, thereby showing the face of the person who decided to speak in anonymity.
Wikipedia gives "pixelization", but pixelate appears more common.
Many will write "pixelated" even when it would be more correct to use another word (eg I News referring to a blurred image as "pixelated"):
blurred out (if the image is made blurry)
blacked out (made black)
blanked out (made black or white)- blocked out
masked out (any kind of blurring/rectangle/pixelation which prevents you seeing the face)
So you can have
- They removed the blurring, thereby showing the face ...
If it is actually censorship and not privacy, you can also write
- The removed the censoring/censorship, thereby showing the offensive symbol
Very occasionally you see redaction bar Guardian which would be appropriate for both privacy and censorship. You could certainly write
- They removed the redaction, thereby showing the face ...
"Redaction" is quite a formal word.
New contributor
1
Similarly you could say "They uncensored the video, showing their face/the symbol/etc..."
– BruceWayne
yesterday
Pixelation cannot be "removed". You have to get your hands on an original copy.
– Mazura
yesterday
@Mazura "Remove the pixelation" is something you'd hear in an edit or suite or broadcast unit, just as you might hear "Remove the subtitles". Of course I agree with you that you can't take the pixelated or subtitled image and recreate the raw image, but certainly people use "Remove X" to mean "Don't add X".
– jonathanjo
yesterday
add a comment |
When it's done as pixels, we use pixelated and pixelation.
You can write:
- They removed the pixelation, thereby showing the face of the person who decided to speak in anonymity.
Wikipedia gives "pixelization", but pixelate appears more common.
Many will write "pixelated" even when it would be more correct to use another word (eg I News referring to a blurred image as "pixelated"):
blurred out (if the image is made blurry)
blacked out (made black)
blanked out (made black or white)- blocked out
masked out (any kind of blurring/rectangle/pixelation which prevents you seeing the face)
So you can have
- They removed the blurring, thereby showing the face ...
If it is actually censorship and not privacy, you can also write
- The removed the censoring/censorship, thereby showing the offensive symbol
Very occasionally you see redaction bar Guardian which would be appropriate for both privacy and censorship. You could certainly write
- They removed the redaction, thereby showing the face ...
"Redaction" is quite a formal word.
New contributor
1
Similarly you could say "They uncensored the video, showing their face/the symbol/etc..."
– BruceWayne
yesterday
Pixelation cannot be "removed". You have to get your hands on an original copy.
– Mazura
yesterday
@Mazura "Remove the pixelation" is something you'd hear in an edit or suite or broadcast unit, just as you might hear "Remove the subtitles". Of course I agree with you that you can't take the pixelated or subtitled image and recreate the raw image, but certainly people use "Remove X" to mean "Don't add X".
– jonathanjo
yesterday
add a comment |
When it's done as pixels, we use pixelated and pixelation.
You can write:
- They removed the pixelation, thereby showing the face of the person who decided to speak in anonymity.
Wikipedia gives "pixelization", but pixelate appears more common.
Many will write "pixelated" even when it would be more correct to use another word (eg I News referring to a blurred image as "pixelated"):
blurred out (if the image is made blurry)
blacked out (made black)
blanked out (made black or white)- blocked out
masked out (any kind of blurring/rectangle/pixelation which prevents you seeing the face)
So you can have
- They removed the blurring, thereby showing the face ...
If it is actually censorship and not privacy, you can also write
- The removed the censoring/censorship, thereby showing the offensive symbol
Very occasionally you see redaction bar Guardian which would be appropriate for both privacy and censorship. You could certainly write
- They removed the redaction, thereby showing the face ...
"Redaction" is quite a formal word.
New contributor
When it's done as pixels, we use pixelated and pixelation.
You can write:
- They removed the pixelation, thereby showing the face of the person who decided to speak in anonymity.
Wikipedia gives "pixelization", but pixelate appears more common.
Many will write "pixelated" even when it would be more correct to use another word (eg I News referring to a blurred image as "pixelated"):
blurred out (if the image is made blurry)
blacked out (made black)
blanked out (made black or white)- blocked out
masked out (any kind of blurring/rectangle/pixelation which prevents you seeing the face)
So you can have
- They removed the blurring, thereby showing the face ...
If it is actually censorship and not privacy, you can also write
- The removed the censoring/censorship, thereby showing the offensive symbol
Very occasionally you see redaction bar Guardian which would be appropriate for both privacy and censorship. You could certainly write
- They removed the redaction, thereby showing the face ...
"Redaction" is quite a formal word.
New contributor
edited yesterday
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
jonathanjojonathanjo
90110
90110
New contributor
New contributor
1
Similarly you could say "They uncensored the video, showing their face/the symbol/etc..."
– BruceWayne
yesterday
Pixelation cannot be "removed". You have to get your hands on an original copy.
– Mazura
yesterday
@Mazura "Remove the pixelation" is something you'd hear in an edit or suite or broadcast unit, just as you might hear "Remove the subtitles". Of course I agree with you that you can't take the pixelated or subtitled image and recreate the raw image, but certainly people use "Remove X" to mean "Don't add X".
– jonathanjo
yesterday
add a comment |
1
Similarly you could say "They uncensored the video, showing their face/the symbol/etc..."
– BruceWayne
yesterday
Pixelation cannot be "removed". You have to get your hands on an original copy.
– Mazura
yesterday
@Mazura "Remove the pixelation" is something you'd hear in an edit or suite or broadcast unit, just as you might hear "Remove the subtitles". Of course I agree with you that you can't take the pixelated or subtitled image and recreate the raw image, but certainly people use "Remove X" to mean "Don't add X".
– jonathanjo
yesterday
1
1
Similarly you could say "They uncensored the video, showing their face/the symbol/etc..."
– BruceWayne
yesterday
Similarly you could say "They uncensored the video, showing their face/the symbol/etc..."
– BruceWayne
yesterday
Pixelation cannot be "removed". You have to get your hands on an original copy.
– Mazura
yesterday
Pixelation cannot be "removed". You have to get your hands on an original copy.
– Mazura
yesterday
@Mazura "Remove the pixelation" is something you'd hear in an edit or suite or broadcast unit, just as you might hear "Remove the subtitles". Of course I agree with you that you can't take the pixelated or subtitled image and recreate the raw image, but certainly people use "Remove X" to mean "Don't add X".
– jonathanjo
yesterday
@Mazura "Remove the pixelation" is something you'd hear in an edit or suite or broadcast unit, just as you might hear "Remove the subtitles". Of course I agree with you that you can't take the pixelated or subtitled image and recreate the raw image, but certainly people use "Remove X" to mean "Don't add X".
– jonathanjo
yesterday
add a comment |
You ask if there's a noun for it. There is: pixelation.
So you could say
They removed the pixelation from the face of ... .
You could also use unpixelate or depixelate:
They unpixelated the face of the person ... .
or
They depixelated the face of the person ... .
or
They deobfuscated the face of the person ... .
Of course, you can say unpixelated the video, unpixelated that portion of the video that had obscured the face of ... . Etc.
You can search online and find many examples of unpixelate and depixelate.
add a comment |
You ask if there's a noun for it. There is: pixelation.
So you could say
They removed the pixelation from the face of ... .
You could also use unpixelate or depixelate:
They unpixelated the face of the person ... .
or
They depixelated the face of the person ... .
or
They deobfuscated the face of the person ... .
Of course, you can say unpixelated the video, unpixelated that portion of the video that had obscured the face of ... . Etc.
You can search online and find many examples of unpixelate and depixelate.
add a comment |
You ask if there's a noun for it. There is: pixelation.
So you could say
They removed the pixelation from the face of ... .
You could also use unpixelate or depixelate:
They unpixelated the face of the person ... .
or
They depixelated the face of the person ... .
or
They deobfuscated the face of the person ... .
Of course, you can say unpixelated the video, unpixelated that portion of the video that had obscured the face of ... . Etc.
You can search online and find many examples of unpixelate and depixelate.
You ask if there's a noun for it. There is: pixelation.
So you could say
They removed the pixelation from the face of ... .
You could also use unpixelate or depixelate:
They unpixelated the face of the person ... .
or
They depixelated the face of the person ... .
or
They deobfuscated the face of the person ... .
Of course, you can say unpixelated the video, unpixelated that portion of the video that had obscured the face of ... . Etc.
You can search online and find many examples of unpixelate and depixelate.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Jim ReynoldsJim Reynolds
8,8541640
8,8541640
add a comment |
add a comment |
That type of censoring is called "pixelation" or "mosaic", so you can say "They removed the censoring mosaic...". Or you could just say "they removed the censorship..."
The "censored part" would refer not to the mosaic, but to the face that was being hidden, or possibly the section of the video that contained censoring. This would not reveal the face that had been hidden.
Note that hiding faces in this way is usually about privacy, not censorship
1
If they "removed the censored part", then they just cut out every part of the video that had [word OP is asking for] in it.
– Mazura
yesterday
add a comment |
That type of censoring is called "pixelation" or "mosaic", so you can say "They removed the censoring mosaic...". Or you could just say "they removed the censorship..."
The "censored part" would refer not to the mosaic, but to the face that was being hidden, or possibly the section of the video that contained censoring. This would not reveal the face that had been hidden.
Note that hiding faces in this way is usually about privacy, not censorship
1
If they "removed the censored part", then they just cut out every part of the video that had [word OP is asking for] in it.
– Mazura
yesterday
add a comment |
That type of censoring is called "pixelation" or "mosaic", so you can say "They removed the censoring mosaic...". Or you could just say "they removed the censorship..."
The "censored part" would refer not to the mosaic, but to the face that was being hidden, or possibly the section of the video that contained censoring. This would not reveal the face that had been hidden.
Note that hiding faces in this way is usually about privacy, not censorship
That type of censoring is called "pixelation" or "mosaic", so you can say "They removed the censoring mosaic...". Or you could just say "they removed the censorship..."
The "censored part" would refer not to the mosaic, but to the face that was being hidden, or possibly the section of the video that contained censoring. This would not reveal the face that had been hidden.
Note that hiding faces in this way is usually about privacy, not censorship
edited 11 hours ago
answered 2 days ago
James KJames K
42.8k145107
42.8k145107
1
If they "removed the censored part", then they just cut out every part of the video that had [word OP is asking for] in it.
– Mazura
yesterday
add a comment |
1
If they "removed the censored part", then they just cut out every part of the video that had [word OP is asking for] in it.
– Mazura
yesterday
1
1
If they "removed the censored part", then they just cut out every part of the video that had [word OP is asking for] in it.
– Mazura
yesterday
If they "removed the censored part", then they just cut out every part of the video that had [word OP is asking for] in it.
– Mazura
yesterday
add a comment |
better alternative: uncensored
Removing a censor is pretty much impossible; the data is lost. Likely what you have is the original uncensored video.
They
removed the censored partreleased the uncensored video which shows the face of a person who had requested anonymity, which was previously obfuscated through the use of [words in the other answers].
obfuscated
isn't really normal usage here; no-on else has mentionedmasked
which would work better.
– Mike Brockington
yesterday
>To obfuscate something means to make it so that it isn't clear or transparent, much like dirty water makes it hard to see to the bottom of a pond. The verb shares its ob- root (meaning "over, completely") with obscure, another word that can refer to the act of concealing something or making it more difficult to see or understand. The rest of obfuscate comes from Latin fuscus, which means "dark brown" and is distantly related to our word dusk. – MW
– Mazura
yesterday
@MikeBrockington - I suspect you feel that way because you're a programmer. In A/V it's probably called a mask. In layman's terms, hidden would be the best bet in place of obfuscated. As a learner, I might just wonder what sort of tech you have that can remove a 'mask' that they're wearing and digitally reconstruct someone's face.
– Mazura
yesterday
add a comment |
better alternative: uncensored
Removing a censor is pretty much impossible; the data is lost. Likely what you have is the original uncensored video.
They
removed the censored partreleased the uncensored video which shows the face of a person who had requested anonymity, which was previously obfuscated through the use of [words in the other answers].
obfuscated
isn't really normal usage here; no-on else has mentionedmasked
which would work better.
– Mike Brockington
yesterday
>To obfuscate something means to make it so that it isn't clear or transparent, much like dirty water makes it hard to see to the bottom of a pond. The verb shares its ob- root (meaning "over, completely") with obscure, another word that can refer to the act of concealing something or making it more difficult to see or understand. The rest of obfuscate comes from Latin fuscus, which means "dark brown" and is distantly related to our word dusk. – MW
– Mazura
yesterday
@MikeBrockington - I suspect you feel that way because you're a programmer. In A/V it's probably called a mask. In layman's terms, hidden would be the best bet in place of obfuscated. As a learner, I might just wonder what sort of tech you have that can remove a 'mask' that they're wearing and digitally reconstruct someone's face.
– Mazura
yesterday
add a comment |
better alternative: uncensored
Removing a censor is pretty much impossible; the data is lost. Likely what you have is the original uncensored video.
They
removed the censored partreleased the uncensored video which shows the face of a person who had requested anonymity, which was previously obfuscated through the use of [words in the other answers].
better alternative: uncensored
Removing a censor is pretty much impossible; the data is lost. Likely what you have is the original uncensored video.
They
removed the censored partreleased the uncensored video which shows the face of a person who had requested anonymity, which was previously obfuscated through the use of [words in the other answers].
answered yesterday
MazuraMazura
22417
22417
obfuscated
isn't really normal usage here; no-on else has mentionedmasked
which would work better.
– Mike Brockington
yesterday
>To obfuscate something means to make it so that it isn't clear or transparent, much like dirty water makes it hard to see to the bottom of a pond. The verb shares its ob- root (meaning "over, completely") with obscure, another word that can refer to the act of concealing something or making it more difficult to see or understand. The rest of obfuscate comes from Latin fuscus, which means "dark brown" and is distantly related to our word dusk. – MW
– Mazura
yesterday
@MikeBrockington - I suspect you feel that way because you're a programmer. In A/V it's probably called a mask. In layman's terms, hidden would be the best bet in place of obfuscated. As a learner, I might just wonder what sort of tech you have that can remove a 'mask' that they're wearing and digitally reconstruct someone's face.
– Mazura
yesterday
add a comment |
obfuscated
isn't really normal usage here; no-on else has mentionedmasked
which would work better.
– Mike Brockington
yesterday
>To obfuscate something means to make it so that it isn't clear or transparent, much like dirty water makes it hard to see to the bottom of a pond. The verb shares its ob- root (meaning "over, completely") with obscure, another word that can refer to the act of concealing something or making it more difficult to see or understand. The rest of obfuscate comes from Latin fuscus, which means "dark brown" and is distantly related to our word dusk. – MW
– Mazura
yesterday
@MikeBrockington - I suspect you feel that way because you're a programmer. In A/V it's probably called a mask. In layman's terms, hidden would be the best bet in place of obfuscated. As a learner, I might just wonder what sort of tech you have that can remove a 'mask' that they're wearing and digitally reconstruct someone's face.
– Mazura
yesterday
obfuscated
isn't really normal usage here; no-on else has mentioned masked
which would work better.– Mike Brockington
yesterday
obfuscated
isn't really normal usage here; no-on else has mentioned masked
which would work better.– Mike Brockington
yesterday
>To obfuscate something means to make it so that it isn't clear or transparent, much like dirty water makes it hard to see to the bottom of a pond. The verb shares its ob- root (meaning "over, completely") with obscure, another word that can refer to the act of concealing something or making it more difficult to see or understand. The rest of obfuscate comes from Latin fuscus, which means "dark brown" and is distantly related to our word dusk. – MW
– Mazura
yesterday
>To obfuscate something means to make it so that it isn't clear or transparent, much like dirty water makes it hard to see to the bottom of a pond. The verb shares its ob- root (meaning "over, completely") with obscure, another word that can refer to the act of concealing something or making it more difficult to see or understand. The rest of obfuscate comes from Latin fuscus, which means "dark brown" and is distantly related to our word dusk. – MW
– Mazura
yesterday
@MikeBrockington - I suspect you feel that way because you're a programmer. In A/V it's probably called a mask. In layman's terms, hidden would be the best bet in place of obfuscated. As a learner, I might just wonder what sort of tech you have that can remove a 'mask' that they're wearing and digitally reconstruct someone's face.
– Mazura
yesterday
@MikeBrockington - I suspect you feel that way because you're a programmer. In A/V it's probably called a mask. In layman's terms, hidden would be the best bet in place of obfuscated. As a learner, I might just wonder what sort of tech you have that can remove a 'mask' that they're wearing and digitally reconstruct someone's face.
– Mazura
yesterday
add a comment |
blackbird is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
blackbird is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
blackbird is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
blackbird is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208083%2fis-there-a-word-for-the-censored-part-of-a-video%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown