Partitioning values in a sequenceOrdering the elements in a list and separate them into sublists for...

How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?

Error message with tabularx

How to reduce LED flash rate (frequency)

Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?

Seemingly unused edef prior to an ifx mysteriously affects the outcome of the ifx. Why?

Was there a shared-world project before "Thieves World"?

Is the 5 MB static resource size limit 5,242,880 bytes or 5,000,000 bytes?

What do the phrase "Reeyan's seacrest" and the word "fraggle" mean in a sketch?

Meaning of Bloch representation

How to verbalise code in Mathematica?

Please, smoke with good manners

Document starts having heaps of errors in the middle, but the code doesn't have any problems in it

How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?

How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?

What's the polite way to say "I need to urinate"?

Why was the Spitfire's elliptical wing almost uncopied by other aircraft of World War 2?

How can I place the product on a social media post better?

To say I met a person for the first time

Combinable filters

Apply MapThread to all but one variable

Is there an official tutorial for installing Ubuntu 18.04+ on a device with an SSD and an additional internal hard drive?

Rivers without rain

Can someone publish a story that happened to you?

How would one muzzle a full grown polar bear in the 13th century?



Partitioning values in a sequence


Ordering the elements in a list and separate them into sublists for plottingFinding all partitions of a setPartitioning an image based on featuresPartition list into a given number of sub-listsPartitioning List Into Sublists of Length 2 With The Pairing Being RandomCluster numbers into n partitions so that each partitions sum is closest to total/nEfficient lazy weak compositionsTiming and memory use is critical:fast partitioning of binary sparse arrayVariable iterator in Do Loop (splitting a list)Non-Constant Partitioning of a List with Order AnalysisTotally orderless partition













3












$begingroup$


I have a sequence that forms visible lines when plotted as a graph, what would be a good way to automatically partition the sequence to create a list of sequences, one for each line that is visible when the sequence is plotted?



Here is the start of the sequence:



list = {2,3,5,11,7,23,13,29,41,17,53,37,83,43,89,19,113,131,67,47,73,31,79,173,179,61,191,97,233,239,251,127,139,281,71,293,101,103,107,163,59,359,193,199,137,419,431,443,151,491,509,181,109,277,593,149,307,641,653,659,683,719,241,743,373,761,257,157,263,809,271,409,283,433,911,311,313,953,487,331,499,1013,1019,1031,347,1049,211,269,367,1103,577,167,397,1223,1229,619,1289,223,673,229,461,467,1409,709,1439,1451,727,739,1481,1499,503,1511,1559,1583,1601,401,557,337,853,1733,349,883,197};


Thanks.



cheers,
Jamie










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of ordering-the-elements-in-a-list-and-separate-them-into-sublists-for-plotting
    $endgroup$
    – MelaGo
    yesterday
















3












$begingroup$


I have a sequence that forms visible lines when plotted as a graph, what would be a good way to automatically partition the sequence to create a list of sequences, one for each line that is visible when the sequence is plotted?



Here is the start of the sequence:



list = {2,3,5,11,7,23,13,29,41,17,53,37,83,43,89,19,113,131,67,47,73,31,79,173,179,61,191,97,233,239,251,127,139,281,71,293,101,103,107,163,59,359,193,199,137,419,431,443,151,491,509,181,109,277,593,149,307,641,653,659,683,719,241,743,373,761,257,157,263,809,271,409,283,433,911,311,313,953,487,331,499,1013,1019,1031,347,1049,211,269,367,1103,577,167,397,1223,1229,619,1289,223,673,229,461,467,1409,709,1439,1451,727,739,1481,1499,503,1511,1559,1583,1601,401,557,337,853,1733,349,883,197};


Thanks.



cheers,
Jamie










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of ordering-the-elements-in-a-list-and-separate-them-into-sublists-for-plotting
    $endgroup$
    – MelaGo
    yesterday














3












3








3





$begingroup$


I have a sequence that forms visible lines when plotted as a graph, what would be a good way to automatically partition the sequence to create a list of sequences, one for each line that is visible when the sequence is plotted?



Here is the start of the sequence:



list = {2,3,5,11,7,23,13,29,41,17,53,37,83,43,89,19,113,131,67,47,73,31,79,173,179,61,191,97,233,239,251,127,139,281,71,293,101,103,107,163,59,359,193,199,137,419,431,443,151,491,509,181,109,277,593,149,307,641,653,659,683,719,241,743,373,761,257,157,263,809,271,409,283,433,911,311,313,953,487,331,499,1013,1019,1031,347,1049,211,269,367,1103,577,167,397,1223,1229,619,1289,223,673,229,461,467,1409,709,1439,1451,727,739,1481,1499,503,1511,1559,1583,1601,401,557,337,853,1733,349,883,197};


Thanks.



cheers,
Jamie










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have a sequence that forms visible lines when plotted as a graph, what would be a good way to automatically partition the sequence to create a list of sequences, one for each line that is visible when the sequence is plotted?



Here is the start of the sequence:



list = {2,3,5,11,7,23,13,29,41,17,53,37,83,43,89,19,113,131,67,47,73,31,79,173,179,61,191,97,233,239,251,127,139,281,71,293,101,103,107,163,59,359,193,199,137,419,431,443,151,491,509,181,109,277,593,149,307,641,653,659,683,719,241,743,373,761,257,157,263,809,271,409,283,433,911,311,313,953,487,331,499,1013,1019,1031,347,1049,211,269,367,1103,577,167,397,1223,1229,619,1289,223,673,229,461,467,1409,709,1439,1451,727,739,1481,1499,503,1511,1559,1583,1601,401,557,337,853,1733,349,883,197};


Thanks.



cheers,
Jamie







partitions






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









user64494

3,65311122




3,65311122










asked yesterday









Jamie MJamie M

525




525












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of ordering-the-elements-in-a-list-and-separate-them-into-sublists-for-plotting
    $endgroup$
    – MelaGo
    yesterday


















  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of ordering-the-elements-in-a-list-and-separate-them-into-sublists-for-plotting
    $endgroup$
    – MelaGo
    yesterday
















$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of ordering-the-elements-in-a-list-and-separate-them-into-sublists-for-plotting
$endgroup$
– MelaGo
yesterday




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of ordering-the-elements-in-a-list-and-separate-them-into-sublists-for-plotting
$endgroup$
– MelaGo
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

You could for instance fit a mean polynomial function through the data:



fun = NonlinearModelFit[list, a x^2 + b x + c , {a, b, c}, x] //Normal



-48.3941 + 6.86017 x + 0.0161064 x^2




This will separarate the upper line from the lower line that you can see in the plot:



Show[
ListLinePlot[list, PlotRange -> All],
Plot[fun, {x, 0, 125}, PlotRange -> All, PlotStyle -> Red],
PlotRange -> All]


enter image description here



Then you can simply run through the list and separate it into two lists based on whether the value is above or below the mean fit:



upperLine = {};
lowerLine = {};
shift=1;
Do[
If[list[[x]] > fun+shift,
AppendTo[upperLine, {x, list[[x]]}],
AppendTo[lowerLine, {x, list[[x]]}]];
, {x, 1, Length[list]}]


The upperLine and lowerLine data sets then look like:



{ListLinePlot[upperLine], ListLinePlot[lowerLine]}


enter image description here



Repeat the process on the lowerLine data to separate the sequences further. For instance for the next line:



newlist = lowerLine;
fun = NonlinearModelFit[newlist, a x^2 + b x + c, {a, b, c}, x] // Normal;
upperLine2 = {};
lowerLine = {};
shift = 10;
Do[If[newlist[[i, 2]] > (fun + shift /. x -> newlist[[i, 1]]),
AppendTo[upperLine2, newlist[[i]]],
AppendTo[lowerLine, newlist[[i]]]];
, {i, 1, Length[newlist]}]


And the next line:



newlist = lowerLine;
fun = NonlinearModelFit[ newlist[[FindPeaks[newlist[[;; , 2]]][[;; , 1]]]], a x^2 + b x + c, {a, b, c}, x] // Normal;
upperLine3 = {};
lowerLine = {};
shift = -8;
Do[If[newlist[[i, 2]] > (fun + shift /. x -> newlist[[i, 1]]),
AppendTo[upperLine3, newlist[[i]]],
AppendTo[lowerLine, newlist[[i]]]];
, {i, 1, Length[newlist]}]


So far this looks like:



Show[ListPlot[upperLine, PlotStyle -> Red], 
ListPlot[upperLine2, PlotStyle -> Green],
ListPlot[upperLine3, PlotStyle -> Black],
ListPlot[lowerLine, PlotStyle -> Blue]]


enter image description here



You'll have to play with the shift parameter a bit for optimal results. Just execute the fit first and plot it against newlist, adjust shift and proceed.



PS:



If you have a mathematical model for a function that describes these curves, you could use it with intermediate parameter values instead of the polynomial fit to separate the points much better.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    How could I have the polynomial adjusted upwards, ie offset a certain distance from the max value? the max value will always be in the uppermost line being partitioned out.
    $endgroup$
    – Jamie M
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @JamieM After making the fit, try plotting fun+c instead of fun, where you put a real number for the shift c. This will shift the curve up and down allowing you to separate points a bit more precisely. Is that what you had in mind?
    $endgroup$
    – Kagaratsch
    yesterday



















6












$begingroup$

list = {2, 3, 5, 11, 7, 23, 13, 29, 41, 17, 53, 37, 83, 43, 89, 19, 
113, 131, 67, 47, 73, 31, 79, 173, 179, 61, 191, 97, 233, 239, 251,
127, 139, 281, 71, 293, 101, 103, 107, 163, 59, 359, 193, 199,
137, 419, 431, 443, 151, 491, 509, 181, 109, 277, 593, 149, 307,
641, 653, 659, 683, 719, 241, 743, 373, 761, 257, 157, 263, 809,
271, 409, 283, 433, 911, 311, 313, 953, 487, 331, 499, 1013, 1019,
1031, 347, 1049, 211, 269, 367, 1103, 577, 167, 397, 1223, 1229,
619, 1289, 223, 673, 229, 461, 467, 1409, 709, 1439, 1451, 727,
739, 1481, 1499, 503, 1511, 1559, 1583, 1601, 401, 557, 337, 853,
1733, 349, 883, 197};

upper = FindPeaks[list];

lower = {1, -1} # & /@ FindPeaks[-list];

ListLinePlot[{list, lower, upper},
PlotStyle -> {LightGray, Blue, Red}]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "387"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f197055%2fpartitioning-values-in-a-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    You could for instance fit a mean polynomial function through the data:



    fun = NonlinearModelFit[list, a x^2 + b x + c , {a, b, c}, x] //Normal



    -48.3941 + 6.86017 x + 0.0161064 x^2




    This will separarate the upper line from the lower line that you can see in the plot:



    Show[
    ListLinePlot[list, PlotRange -> All],
    Plot[fun, {x, 0, 125}, PlotRange -> All, PlotStyle -> Red],
    PlotRange -> All]


    enter image description here



    Then you can simply run through the list and separate it into two lists based on whether the value is above or below the mean fit:



    upperLine = {};
    lowerLine = {};
    shift=1;
    Do[
    If[list[[x]] > fun+shift,
    AppendTo[upperLine, {x, list[[x]]}],
    AppendTo[lowerLine, {x, list[[x]]}]];
    , {x, 1, Length[list]}]


    The upperLine and lowerLine data sets then look like:



    {ListLinePlot[upperLine], ListLinePlot[lowerLine]}


    enter image description here



    Repeat the process on the lowerLine data to separate the sequences further. For instance for the next line:



    newlist = lowerLine;
    fun = NonlinearModelFit[newlist, a x^2 + b x + c, {a, b, c}, x] // Normal;
    upperLine2 = {};
    lowerLine = {};
    shift = 10;
    Do[If[newlist[[i, 2]] > (fun + shift /. x -> newlist[[i, 1]]),
    AppendTo[upperLine2, newlist[[i]]],
    AppendTo[lowerLine, newlist[[i]]]];
    , {i, 1, Length[newlist]}]


    And the next line:



    newlist = lowerLine;
    fun = NonlinearModelFit[ newlist[[FindPeaks[newlist[[;; , 2]]][[;; , 1]]]], a x^2 + b x + c, {a, b, c}, x] // Normal;
    upperLine3 = {};
    lowerLine = {};
    shift = -8;
    Do[If[newlist[[i, 2]] > (fun + shift /. x -> newlist[[i, 1]]),
    AppendTo[upperLine3, newlist[[i]]],
    AppendTo[lowerLine, newlist[[i]]]];
    , {i, 1, Length[newlist]}]


    So far this looks like:



    Show[ListPlot[upperLine, PlotStyle -> Red], 
    ListPlot[upperLine2, PlotStyle -> Green],
    ListPlot[upperLine3, PlotStyle -> Black],
    ListPlot[lowerLine, PlotStyle -> Blue]]


    enter image description here



    You'll have to play with the shift parameter a bit for optimal results. Just execute the fit first and plot it against newlist, adjust shift and proceed.



    PS:



    If you have a mathematical model for a function that describes these curves, you could use it with intermediate parameter values instead of the polynomial fit to separate the points much better.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      How could I have the polynomial adjusted upwards, ie offset a certain distance from the max value? the max value will always be in the uppermost line being partitioned out.
      $endgroup$
      – Jamie M
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @JamieM After making the fit, try plotting fun+c instead of fun, where you put a real number for the shift c. This will shift the curve up and down allowing you to separate points a bit more precisely. Is that what you had in mind?
      $endgroup$
      – Kagaratsch
      yesterday
















    3












    $begingroup$

    You could for instance fit a mean polynomial function through the data:



    fun = NonlinearModelFit[list, a x^2 + b x + c , {a, b, c}, x] //Normal



    -48.3941 + 6.86017 x + 0.0161064 x^2




    This will separarate the upper line from the lower line that you can see in the plot:



    Show[
    ListLinePlot[list, PlotRange -> All],
    Plot[fun, {x, 0, 125}, PlotRange -> All, PlotStyle -> Red],
    PlotRange -> All]


    enter image description here



    Then you can simply run through the list and separate it into two lists based on whether the value is above or below the mean fit:



    upperLine = {};
    lowerLine = {};
    shift=1;
    Do[
    If[list[[x]] > fun+shift,
    AppendTo[upperLine, {x, list[[x]]}],
    AppendTo[lowerLine, {x, list[[x]]}]];
    , {x, 1, Length[list]}]


    The upperLine and lowerLine data sets then look like:



    {ListLinePlot[upperLine], ListLinePlot[lowerLine]}


    enter image description here



    Repeat the process on the lowerLine data to separate the sequences further. For instance for the next line:



    newlist = lowerLine;
    fun = NonlinearModelFit[newlist, a x^2 + b x + c, {a, b, c}, x] // Normal;
    upperLine2 = {};
    lowerLine = {};
    shift = 10;
    Do[If[newlist[[i, 2]] > (fun + shift /. x -> newlist[[i, 1]]),
    AppendTo[upperLine2, newlist[[i]]],
    AppendTo[lowerLine, newlist[[i]]]];
    , {i, 1, Length[newlist]}]


    And the next line:



    newlist = lowerLine;
    fun = NonlinearModelFit[ newlist[[FindPeaks[newlist[[;; , 2]]][[;; , 1]]]], a x^2 + b x + c, {a, b, c}, x] // Normal;
    upperLine3 = {};
    lowerLine = {};
    shift = -8;
    Do[If[newlist[[i, 2]] > (fun + shift /. x -> newlist[[i, 1]]),
    AppendTo[upperLine3, newlist[[i]]],
    AppendTo[lowerLine, newlist[[i]]]];
    , {i, 1, Length[newlist]}]


    So far this looks like:



    Show[ListPlot[upperLine, PlotStyle -> Red], 
    ListPlot[upperLine2, PlotStyle -> Green],
    ListPlot[upperLine3, PlotStyle -> Black],
    ListPlot[lowerLine, PlotStyle -> Blue]]


    enter image description here



    You'll have to play with the shift parameter a bit for optimal results. Just execute the fit first and plot it against newlist, adjust shift and proceed.



    PS:



    If you have a mathematical model for a function that describes these curves, you could use it with intermediate parameter values instead of the polynomial fit to separate the points much better.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      How could I have the polynomial adjusted upwards, ie offset a certain distance from the max value? the max value will always be in the uppermost line being partitioned out.
      $endgroup$
      – Jamie M
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @JamieM After making the fit, try plotting fun+c instead of fun, where you put a real number for the shift c. This will shift the curve up and down allowing you to separate points a bit more precisely. Is that what you had in mind?
      $endgroup$
      – Kagaratsch
      yesterday














    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    You could for instance fit a mean polynomial function through the data:



    fun = NonlinearModelFit[list, a x^2 + b x + c , {a, b, c}, x] //Normal



    -48.3941 + 6.86017 x + 0.0161064 x^2




    This will separarate the upper line from the lower line that you can see in the plot:



    Show[
    ListLinePlot[list, PlotRange -> All],
    Plot[fun, {x, 0, 125}, PlotRange -> All, PlotStyle -> Red],
    PlotRange -> All]


    enter image description here



    Then you can simply run through the list and separate it into two lists based on whether the value is above or below the mean fit:



    upperLine = {};
    lowerLine = {};
    shift=1;
    Do[
    If[list[[x]] > fun+shift,
    AppendTo[upperLine, {x, list[[x]]}],
    AppendTo[lowerLine, {x, list[[x]]}]];
    , {x, 1, Length[list]}]


    The upperLine and lowerLine data sets then look like:



    {ListLinePlot[upperLine], ListLinePlot[lowerLine]}


    enter image description here



    Repeat the process on the lowerLine data to separate the sequences further. For instance for the next line:



    newlist = lowerLine;
    fun = NonlinearModelFit[newlist, a x^2 + b x + c, {a, b, c}, x] // Normal;
    upperLine2 = {};
    lowerLine = {};
    shift = 10;
    Do[If[newlist[[i, 2]] > (fun + shift /. x -> newlist[[i, 1]]),
    AppendTo[upperLine2, newlist[[i]]],
    AppendTo[lowerLine, newlist[[i]]]];
    , {i, 1, Length[newlist]}]


    And the next line:



    newlist = lowerLine;
    fun = NonlinearModelFit[ newlist[[FindPeaks[newlist[[;; , 2]]][[;; , 1]]]], a x^2 + b x + c, {a, b, c}, x] // Normal;
    upperLine3 = {};
    lowerLine = {};
    shift = -8;
    Do[If[newlist[[i, 2]] > (fun + shift /. x -> newlist[[i, 1]]),
    AppendTo[upperLine3, newlist[[i]]],
    AppendTo[lowerLine, newlist[[i]]]];
    , {i, 1, Length[newlist]}]


    So far this looks like:



    Show[ListPlot[upperLine, PlotStyle -> Red], 
    ListPlot[upperLine2, PlotStyle -> Green],
    ListPlot[upperLine3, PlotStyle -> Black],
    ListPlot[lowerLine, PlotStyle -> Blue]]


    enter image description here



    You'll have to play with the shift parameter a bit for optimal results. Just execute the fit first and plot it against newlist, adjust shift and proceed.



    PS:



    If you have a mathematical model for a function that describes these curves, you could use it with intermediate parameter values instead of the polynomial fit to separate the points much better.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    You could for instance fit a mean polynomial function through the data:



    fun = NonlinearModelFit[list, a x^2 + b x + c , {a, b, c}, x] //Normal



    -48.3941 + 6.86017 x + 0.0161064 x^2




    This will separarate the upper line from the lower line that you can see in the plot:



    Show[
    ListLinePlot[list, PlotRange -> All],
    Plot[fun, {x, 0, 125}, PlotRange -> All, PlotStyle -> Red],
    PlotRange -> All]


    enter image description here



    Then you can simply run through the list and separate it into two lists based on whether the value is above or below the mean fit:



    upperLine = {};
    lowerLine = {};
    shift=1;
    Do[
    If[list[[x]] > fun+shift,
    AppendTo[upperLine, {x, list[[x]]}],
    AppendTo[lowerLine, {x, list[[x]]}]];
    , {x, 1, Length[list]}]


    The upperLine and lowerLine data sets then look like:



    {ListLinePlot[upperLine], ListLinePlot[lowerLine]}


    enter image description here



    Repeat the process on the lowerLine data to separate the sequences further. For instance for the next line:



    newlist = lowerLine;
    fun = NonlinearModelFit[newlist, a x^2 + b x + c, {a, b, c}, x] // Normal;
    upperLine2 = {};
    lowerLine = {};
    shift = 10;
    Do[If[newlist[[i, 2]] > (fun + shift /. x -> newlist[[i, 1]]),
    AppendTo[upperLine2, newlist[[i]]],
    AppendTo[lowerLine, newlist[[i]]]];
    , {i, 1, Length[newlist]}]


    And the next line:



    newlist = lowerLine;
    fun = NonlinearModelFit[ newlist[[FindPeaks[newlist[[;; , 2]]][[;; , 1]]]], a x^2 + b x + c, {a, b, c}, x] // Normal;
    upperLine3 = {};
    lowerLine = {};
    shift = -8;
    Do[If[newlist[[i, 2]] > (fun + shift /. x -> newlist[[i, 1]]),
    AppendTo[upperLine3, newlist[[i]]],
    AppendTo[lowerLine, newlist[[i]]]];
    , {i, 1, Length[newlist]}]


    So far this looks like:



    Show[ListPlot[upperLine, PlotStyle -> Red], 
    ListPlot[upperLine2, PlotStyle -> Green],
    ListPlot[upperLine3, PlotStyle -> Black],
    ListPlot[lowerLine, PlotStyle -> Blue]]


    enter image description here



    You'll have to play with the shift parameter a bit for optimal results. Just execute the fit first and plot it against newlist, adjust shift and proceed.



    PS:



    If you have a mathematical model for a function that describes these curves, you could use it with intermediate parameter values instead of the polynomial fit to separate the points much better.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered yesterday









    KagaratschKagaratsch

    4,92231350




    4,92231350












    • $begingroup$
      How could I have the polynomial adjusted upwards, ie offset a certain distance from the max value? the max value will always be in the uppermost line being partitioned out.
      $endgroup$
      – Jamie M
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @JamieM After making the fit, try plotting fun+c instead of fun, where you put a real number for the shift c. This will shift the curve up and down allowing you to separate points a bit more precisely. Is that what you had in mind?
      $endgroup$
      – Kagaratsch
      yesterday


















    • $begingroup$
      How could I have the polynomial adjusted upwards, ie offset a certain distance from the max value? the max value will always be in the uppermost line being partitioned out.
      $endgroup$
      – Jamie M
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @JamieM After making the fit, try plotting fun+c instead of fun, where you put a real number for the shift c. This will shift the curve up and down allowing you to separate points a bit more precisely. Is that what you had in mind?
      $endgroup$
      – Kagaratsch
      yesterday
















    $begingroup$
    How could I have the polynomial adjusted upwards, ie offset a certain distance from the max value? the max value will always be in the uppermost line being partitioned out.
    $endgroup$
    – Jamie M
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    How could I have the polynomial adjusted upwards, ie offset a certain distance from the max value? the max value will always be in the uppermost line being partitioned out.
    $endgroup$
    – Jamie M
    yesterday












    $begingroup$
    @JamieM After making the fit, try plotting fun+c instead of fun, where you put a real number for the shift c. This will shift the curve up and down allowing you to separate points a bit more precisely. Is that what you had in mind?
    $endgroup$
    – Kagaratsch
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    @JamieM After making the fit, try plotting fun+c instead of fun, where you put a real number for the shift c. This will shift the curve up and down allowing you to separate points a bit more precisely. Is that what you had in mind?
    $endgroup$
    – Kagaratsch
    yesterday











    6












    $begingroup$

    list = {2, 3, 5, 11, 7, 23, 13, 29, 41, 17, 53, 37, 83, 43, 89, 19, 
    113, 131, 67, 47, 73, 31, 79, 173, 179, 61, 191, 97, 233, 239, 251,
    127, 139, 281, 71, 293, 101, 103, 107, 163, 59, 359, 193, 199,
    137, 419, 431, 443, 151, 491, 509, 181, 109, 277, 593, 149, 307,
    641, 653, 659, 683, 719, 241, 743, 373, 761, 257, 157, 263, 809,
    271, 409, 283, 433, 911, 311, 313, 953, 487, 331, 499, 1013, 1019,
    1031, 347, 1049, 211, 269, 367, 1103, 577, 167, 397, 1223, 1229,
    619, 1289, 223, 673, 229, 461, 467, 1409, 709, 1439, 1451, 727,
    739, 1481, 1499, 503, 1511, 1559, 1583, 1601, 401, 557, 337, 853,
    1733, 349, 883, 197};

    upper = FindPeaks[list];

    lower = {1, -1} # & /@ FindPeaks[-list];

    ListLinePlot[{list, lower, upper},
    PlotStyle -> {LightGray, Blue, Red}]


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      6












      $begingroup$

      list = {2, 3, 5, 11, 7, 23, 13, 29, 41, 17, 53, 37, 83, 43, 89, 19, 
      113, 131, 67, 47, 73, 31, 79, 173, 179, 61, 191, 97, 233, 239, 251,
      127, 139, 281, 71, 293, 101, 103, 107, 163, 59, 359, 193, 199,
      137, 419, 431, 443, 151, 491, 509, 181, 109, 277, 593, 149, 307,
      641, 653, 659, 683, 719, 241, 743, 373, 761, 257, 157, 263, 809,
      271, 409, 283, 433, 911, 311, 313, 953, 487, 331, 499, 1013, 1019,
      1031, 347, 1049, 211, 269, 367, 1103, 577, 167, 397, 1223, 1229,
      619, 1289, 223, 673, 229, 461, 467, 1409, 709, 1439, 1451, 727,
      739, 1481, 1499, 503, 1511, 1559, 1583, 1601, 401, 557, 337, 853,
      1733, 349, 883, 197};

      upper = FindPeaks[list];

      lower = {1, -1} # & /@ FindPeaks[-list];

      ListLinePlot[{list, lower, upper},
      PlotStyle -> {LightGray, Blue, Red}]


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        6












        6








        6





        $begingroup$

        list = {2, 3, 5, 11, 7, 23, 13, 29, 41, 17, 53, 37, 83, 43, 89, 19, 
        113, 131, 67, 47, 73, 31, 79, 173, 179, 61, 191, 97, 233, 239, 251,
        127, 139, 281, 71, 293, 101, 103, 107, 163, 59, 359, 193, 199,
        137, 419, 431, 443, 151, 491, 509, 181, 109, 277, 593, 149, 307,
        641, 653, 659, 683, 719, 241, 743, 373, 761, 257, 157, 263, 809,
        271, 409, 283, 433, 911, 311, 313, 953, 487, 331, 499, 1013, 1019,
        1031, 347, 1049, 211, 269, 367, 1103, 577, 167, 397, 1223, 1229,
        619, 1289, 223, 673, 229, 461, 467, 1409, 709, 1439, 1451, 727,
        739, 1481, 1499, 503, 1511, 1559, 1583, 1601, 401, 557, 337, 853,
        1733, 349, 883, 197};

        upper = FindPeaks[list];

        lower = {1, -1} # & /@ FindPeaks[-list];

        ListLinePlot[{list, lower, upper},
        PlotStyle -> {LightGray, Blue, Red}]


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        list = {2, 3, 5, 11, 7, 23, 13, 29, 41, 17, 53, 37, 83, 43, 89, 19, 
        113, 131, 67, 47, 73, 31, 79, 173, 179, 61, 191, 97, 233, 239, 251,
        127, 139, 281, 71, 293, 101, 103, 107, 163, 59, 359, 193, 199,
        137, 419, 431, 443, 151, 491, 509, 181, 109, 277, 593, 149, 307,
        641, 653, 659, 683, 719, 241, 743, 373, 761, 257, 157, 263, 809,
        271, 409, 283, 433, 911, 311, 313, 953, 487, 331, 499, 1013, 1019,
        1031, 347, 1049, 211, 269, 367, 1103, 577, 167, 397, 1223, 1229,
        619, 1289, 223, 673, 229, 461, 467, 1409, 709, 1439, 1451, 727,
        739, 1481, 1499, 503, 1511, 1559, 1583, 1601, 401, 557, 337, 853,
        1733, 349, 883, 197};

        upper = FindPeaks[list];

        lower = {1, -1} # & /@ FindPeaks[-list];

        ListLinePlot[{list, lower, upper},
        PlotStyle -> {LightGray, Blue, Red}]


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        Bob HanlonBob Hanlon

        62k33598




        62k33598






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f197055%2fpartitioning-values-in-a-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll? Announcing the arrival of...

            Couldn't open a raw socket. Error: Permission denied (13) (nmap)Is it possible to run networking commands...

            VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...