Inverse of the covariance matrix of a multivariate normal distributionSecond moment of draws from a...

Create chunks from an array

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

Formatting a table to look nice

A bug in Excel? Conditional formatting for marking duplicates also highlights unique value

How do I deal with being envious of my own players?

Book about a time-travel war fought by computers

What could be a means to defeat a childrens’ nightmare?

What is a term for a function that when called repeatedly, has the same effect as calling once?

What is the minimum amount of skill points per HD?

Is every open circuit a capacitor?

Where is this quote about overcoming the impossible said in "Interstellar"?

I can't die. Who am I?

Why doesn't "adolescent" take any articles in "listen to adolescent agonising"?

How can neutral atoms have exactly zero electric field when there is a difference in the positions of the charges?

PTIJ: What’s wrong with eating meat and couscous?

School performs periodic password audits. Is my password compromised?

How can I highlight parts in a screenshot

Can a space-faring robot still function over a billion years?

Caulking a corner instead of taping with joint compound?

Are there other characters in the Star Wars universe who had damaged bodies and needed to wear an outfit like Darth Vader?

GPL code private and stolen

How does signal strength relate to bandwidth?

How to merge row in the first column in LaTeX

Why won't the strings command stop?



Inverse of the covariance matrix of a multivariate normal distribution


Second moment of draws from a multivariate normal covariance matrixWhy do we use the determinant of the covariance matrix when using the multivariate normal?Multivariate normal with singular covarianceUnderstanding the marginal distribution of multivariate normal distributionInference for multivariate normal when the sample covariance matrix is not invertibleIf an inverse covariance matrix is sparse, what can I say about the covariance matrix?Comparison between analytic gradient and numerical gradient for multivariate normal distribution wrt mean and covarianceIn multivariate normal distribution, what does it imply if the covariance matrix does not have full ranksampling from a multivariate normal distributionEstimating means and covariance matrix of a multivariate normal distribution













4












$begingroup$


Is the covariance matrix of a multivariate normal distribution always invertible?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, consider for instance $(X_1,X_2=2X_1)$ when $X_1simmathcal N(0,1).$
    $endgroup$
    – Xi'an
    yesterday


















4












$begingroup$


Is the covariance matrix of a multivariate normal distribution always invertible?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, consider for instance $(X_1,X_2=2X_1)$ when $X_1simmathcal N(0,1).$
    $endgroup$
    – Xi'an
    yesterday
















4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


Is the covariance matrix of a multivariate normal distribution always invertible?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is the covariance matrix of a multivariate normal distribution always invertible?







normal-distribution covariance-matrix matrix linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









kjetil b halvorsen

31k983222




31k983222










asked yesterday









DadooDadoo

375




375








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, consider for instance $(X_1,X_2=2X_1)$ when $X_1simmathcal N(0,1).$
    $endgroup$
    – Xi'an
    yesterday
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, consider for instance $(X_1,X_2=2X_1)$ when $X_1simmathcal N(0,1).$
    $endgroup$
    – Xi'an
    yesterday










1




1




$begingroup$
No, consider for instance $(X_1,X_2=2X_1)$ when $X_1simmathcal N(0,1).$
$endgroup$
– Xi'an
yesterday






$begingroup$
No, consider for instance $(X_1,X_2=2X_1)$ when $X_1simmathcal N(0,1).$
$endgroup$
– Xi'an
yesterday












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

If the variables are perfectly correlated, i.e. $rho=1$, then covariance matrix becomes:
$$Sigma=begin{bmatrix}sigma_1^2 & sigma_1sigma_2 \ sigma_1sigma_2 & sigma_2^2 end{bmatrix}$$



and its determinant is $Delta=sigma_1^2sigma_2^2-sigma_1sigma_2sigma_1sigma_2=0$, which means the matrix is not invertible. A possible case this occurs is $X_1=alpha X_2$ as in @Xian's comment. Here $alpha>0$, but for $alpha<0$ $rho=-1$ which still doesn't save the $Sigma$.



It is only invertible when $|rho|<1$ since the covariance matrix is actually
$$Sigma=begin{bmatrix}sigma_1^2 & rhosigma_1sigma_2 \ rhosigma_1sigma_2 & sigma_2^2 end{bmatrix}$$
And, the determinant is $Delta=sigma_1^2sigma_2^2(1-rho^2)$, which is $>0$ when $|rho|<1$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much. Therefore, if I assume that all the variables are not correlated with one another, is my covariance matrix invertible?
    $endgroup$
    – Dadoo
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Not correlated means $rho=0$, and it is perfectly invertible. And, if some correlation exists such that $|rho|<1$, still it is invertible since $Delta>0$.
    $endgroup$
    – gunes
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – Dadoo
    yesterday






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    This comment thread seems to contain at least one pitfall for the unwary reader who might suppose it refers to anything more general than a bivariate normal distribution. For multivariate normal distributions with more than two variables, it is possible for all correlation coefficients to be close to zero, yet the matrix can still be singular.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @whuber good point. Also, I think one should mention the cases (for bivariate normal distributions) where at least one of the two variance parameters is zero or extremely close to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – statmerkur
    yesterday





















4












$begingroup$

No.



The covariance matrix of two perfectly correlated standard normal random variables is given by $Sigma = pmatrix{1 & 1 \1 & 1}$, which is not invertible.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "65"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f395766%2finverse-of-the-covariance-matrix-of-a-multivariate-normal-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8












    $begingroup$

    If the variables are perfectly correlated, i.e. $rho=1$, then covariance matrix becomes:
    $$Sigma=begin{bmatrix}sigma_1^2 & sigma_1sigma_2 \ sigma_1sigma_2 & sigma_2^2 end{bmatrix}$$



    and its determinant is $Delta=sigma_1^2sigma_2^2-sigma_1sigma_2sigma_1sigma_2=0$, which means the matrix is not invertible. A possible case this occurs is $X_1=alpha X_2$ as in @Xian's comment. Here $alpha>0$, but for $alpha<0$ $rho=-1$ which still doesn't save the $Sigma$.



    It is only invertible when $|rho|<1$ since the covariance matrix is actually
    $$Sigma=begin{bmatrix}sigma_1^2 & rhosigma_1sigma_2 \ rhosigma_1sigma_2 & sigma_2^2 end{bmatrix}$$
    And, the determinant is $Delta=sigma_1^2sigma_2^2(1-rho^2)$, which is $>0$ when $|rho|<1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much. Therefore, if I assume that all the variables are not correlated with one another, is my covariance matrix invertible?
      $endgroup$
      – Dadoo
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      Not correlated means $rho=0$, and it is perfectly invertible. And, if some correlation exists such that $|rho|<1$, still it is invertible since $Delta>0$.
      $endgroup$
      – gunes
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much for the clarification.
      $endgroup$
      – Dadoo
      yesterday






    • 6




      $begingroup$
      This comment thread seems to contain at least one pitfall for the unwary reader who might suppose it refers to anything more general than a bivariate normal distribution. For multivariate normal distributions with more than two variables, it is possible for all correlation coefficients to be close to zero, yet the matrix can still be singular.
      $endgroup$
      – whuber
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @whuber good point. Also, I think one should mention the cases (for bivariate normal distributions) where at least one of the two variance parameters is zero or extremely close to zero.
      $endgroup$
      – statmerkur
      yesterday


















    8












    $begingroup$

    If the variables are perfectly correlated, i.e. $rho=1$, then covariance matrix becomes:
    $$Sigma=begin{bmatrix}sigma_1^2 & sigma_1sigma_2 \ sigma_1sigma_2 & sigma_2^2 end{bmatrix}$$



    and its determinant is $Delta=sigma_1^2sigma_2^2-sigma_1sigma_2sigma_1sigma_2=0$, which means the matrix is not invertible. A possible case this occurs is $X_1=alpha X_2$ as in @Xian's comment. Here $alpha>0$, but for $alpha<0$ $rho=-1$ which still doesn't save the $Sigma$.



    It is only invertible when $|rho|<1$ since the covariance matrix is actually
    $$Sigma=begin{bmatrix}sigma_1^2 & rhosigma_1sigma_2 \ rhosigma_1sigma_2 & sigma_2^2 end{bmatrix}$$
    And, the determinant is $Delta=sigma_1^2sigma_2^2(1-rho^2)$, which is $>0$ when $|rho|<1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much. Therefore, if I assume that all the variables are not correlated with one another, is my covariance matrix invertible?
      $endgroup$
      – Dadoo
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      Not correlated means $rho=0$, and it is perfectly invertible. And, if some correlation exists such that $|rho|<1$, still it is invertible since $Delta>0$.
      $endgroup$
      – gunes
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much for the clarification.
      $endgroup$
      – Dadoo
      yesterday






    • 6




      $begingroup$
      This comment thread seems to contain at least one pitfall for the unwary reader who might suppose it refers to anything more general than a bivariate normal distribution. For multivariate normal distributions with more than two variables, it is possible for all correlation coefficients to be close to zero, yet the matrix can still be singular.
      $endgroup$
      – whuber
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @whuber good point. Also, I think one should mention the cases (for bivariate normal distributions) where at least one of the two variance parameters is zero or extremely close to zero.
      $endgroup$
      – statmerkur
      yesterday
















    8












    8








    8





    $begingroup$

    If the variables are perfectly correlated, i.e. $rho=1$, then covariance matrix becomes:
    $$Sigma=begin{bmatrix}sigma_1^2 & sigma_1sigma_2 \ sigma_1sigma_2 & sigma_2^2 end{bmatrix}$$



    and its determinant is $Delta=sigma_1^2sigma_2^2-sigma_1sigma_2sigma_1sigma_2=0$, which means the matrix is not invertible. A possible case this occurs is $X_1=alpha X_2$ as in @Xian's comment. Here $alpha>0$, but for $alpha<0$ $rho=-1$ which still doesn't save the $Sigma$.



    It is only invertible when $|rho|<1$ since the covariance matrix is actually
    $$Sigma=begin{bmatrix}sigma_1^2 & rhosigma_1sigma_2 \ rhosigma_1sigma_2 & sigma_2^2 end{bmatrix}$$
    And, the determinant is $Delta=sigma_1^2sigma_2^2(1-rho^2)$, which is $>0$ when $|rho|<1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    If the variables are perfectly correlated, i.e. $rho=1$, then covariance matrix becomes:
    $$Sigma=begin{bmatrix}sigma_1^2 & sigma_1sigma_2 \ sigma_1sigma_2 & sigma_2^2 end{bmatrix}$$



    and its determinant is $Delta=sigma_1^2sigma_2^2-sigma_1sigma_2sigma_1sigma_2=0$, which means the matrix is not invertible. A possible case this occurs is $X_1=alpha X_2$ as in @Xian's comment. Here $alpha>0$, but for $alpha<0$ $rho=-1$ which still doesn't save the $Sigma$.



    It is only invertible when $|rho|<1$ since the covariance matrix is actually
    $$Sigma=begin{bmatrix}sigma_1^2 & rhosigma_1sigma_2 \ rhosigma_1sigma_2 & sigma_2^2 end{bmatrix}$$
    And, the determinant is $Delta=sigma_1^2sigma_2^2(1-rho^2)$, which is $>0$ when $|rho|<1$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited yesterday









    whuber

    205k33448816




    205k33448816










    answered yesterday









    gunesgunes

    5,7601115




    5,7601115












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much. Therefore, if I assume that all the variables are not correlated with one another, is my covariance matrix invertible?
      $endgroup$
      – Dadoo
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      Not correlated means $rho=0$, and it is perfectly invertible. And, if some correlation exists such that $|rho|<1$, still it is invertible since $Delta>0$.
      $endgroup$
      – gunes
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much for the clarification.
      $endgroup$
      – Dadoo
      yesterday






    • 6




      $begingroup$
      This comment thread seems to contain at least one pitfall for the unwary reader who might suppose it refers to anything more general than a bivariate normal distribution. For multivariate normal distributions with more than two variables, it is possible for all correlation coefficients to be close to zero, yet the matrix can still be singular.
      $endgroup$
      – whuber
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @whuber good point. Also, I think one should mention the cases (for bivariate normal distributions) where at least one of the two variance parameters is zero or extremely close to zero.
      $endgroup$
      – statmerkur
      yesterday




















    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much. Therefore, if I assume that all the variables are not correlated with one another, is my covariance matrix invertible?
      $endgroup$
      – Dadoo
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      Not correlated means $rho=0$, and it is perfectly invertible. And, if some correlation exists such that $|rho|<1$, still it is invertible since $Delta>0$.
      $endgroup$
      – gunes
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much for the clarification.
      $endgroup$
      – Dadoo
      yesterday






    • 6




      $begingroup$
      This comment thread seems to contain at least one pitfall for the unwary reader who might suppose it refers to anything more general than a bivariate normal distribution. For multivariate normal distributions with more than two variables, it is possible for all correlation coefficients to be close to zero, yet the matrix can still be singular.
      $endgroup$
      – whuber
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @whuber good point. Also, I think one should mention the cases (for bivariate normal distributions) where at least one of the two variance parameters is zero or extremely close to zero.
      $endgroup$
      – statmerkur
      yesterday


















    $begingroup$
    Thank you very much. Therefore, if I assume that all the variables are not correlated with one another, is my covariance matrix invertible?
    $endgroup$
    – Dadoo
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    Thank you very much. Therefore, if I assume that all the variables are not correlated with one another, is my covariance matrix invertible?
    $endgroup$
    – Dadoo
    yesterday












    $begingroup$
    Not correlated means $rho=0$, and it is perfectly invertible. And, if some correlation exists such that $|rho|<1$, still it is invertible since $Delta>0$.
    $endgroup$
    – gunes
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    Not correlated means $rho=0$, and it is perfectly invertible. And, if some correlation exists such that $|rho|<1$, still it is invertible since $Delta>0$.
    $endgroup$
    – gunes
    yesterday












    $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – Dadoo
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – Dadoo
    yesterday




    6




    6




    $begingroup$
    This comment thread seems to contain at least one pitfall for the unwary reader who might suppose it refers to anything more general than a bivariate normal distribution. For multivariate normal distributions with more than two variables, it is possible for all correlation coefficients to be close to zero, yet the matrix can still be singular.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    This comment thread seems to contain at least one pitfall for the unwary reader who might suppose it refers to anything more general than a bivariate normal distribution. For multivariate normal distributions with more than two variables, it is possible for all correlation coefficients to be close to zero, yet the matrix can still be singular.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    yesterday












    $begingroup$
    @whuber good point. Also, I think one should mention the cases (for bivariate normal distributions) where at least one of the two variance parameters is zero or extremely close to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – statmerkur
    yesterday






    $begingroup$
    @whuber good point. Also, I think one should mention the cases (for bivariate normal distributions) where at least one of the two variance parameters is zero or extremely close to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – statmerkur
    yesterday















    4












    $begingroup$

    No.



    The covariance matrix of two perfectly correlated standard normal random variables is given by $Sigma = pmatrix{1 & 1 \1 & 1}$, which is not invertible.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      No.



      The covariance matrix of two perfectly correlated standard normal random variables is given by $Sigma = pmatrix{1 & 1 \1 & 1}$, which is not invertible.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        No.



        The covariance matrix of two perfectly correlated standard normal random variables is given by $Sigma = pmatrix{1 & 1 \1 & 1}$, which is not invertible.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        No.



        The covariance matrix of two perfectly correlated standard normal random variables is given by $Sigma = pmatrix{1 & 1 \1 & 1}$, which is not invertible.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        MKRMKR

        1563




        1563






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f395766%2finverse-of-the-covariance-matrix-of-a-multivariate-normal-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Cannot install PyQt5 The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCannot install tcpreplay 3.4.4cannot...

            Kapp-Putsch Acontecimentos | Outros artigos | Menu de navegação

            Why did early computer designers eschew integers? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat register...