Do higher etale homotopy groups of spectrum of a field always vanish?Fibration sequences in étale homotopy...
Do higher etale homotopy groups of spectrum of a field always vanish?
Fibration sequences in étale homotopy theory arising from geometric fibresThe etale fundamental group of a fieldEtale topos as a classifyng topos ?“Étalification” of a schemealternate interpretations of Galois action on Tate modulequestion about the induced homomorphism of etale fundamental groupsClassifying Spaces and Eilenberg-Maclane objects in the category of simplicial ringsHow is a universal deformation ring in a 1-dimensional DM stack related to the complete etale local ring of coarse moduli scheme?Galois descent for absolute Galois groupLines in upper half-space
$begingroup$
Let $k$ be a field. In what generality is it true that higher etale homotopy groups
of $mathrm{Spec},k$ vanish?
If the absolute Galois group is finite, we have a universal cover $mathrm{Spec},k^{sep}rightarrowmathrm{Spec},k$ which, I believe, is the initial object of the category of etale hypercovers. If we apply $pi_0$ to the simplicial $k$-scheme associated to this cover, the result coincides on the nose with the bar construction for the classifying space of $Gal(k^{sep}/k)$.
I am not sure what happens for general fields.
ag.algebraic-geometry etale-covers
asked yesterday
rorirori
533
New contributor
rori is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $k$ be a field. In what generality is it true that higher etale homotopy groups
of $mathrm{Spec},k$ vanish?
If the absolute Galois group is finite, we have a universal cover $mathrm{Spec},k^{sep}rightarrowmathrm{Spec},k$ which, I believe, is the initial object of the category of etale hypercovers. If we apply $pi_0$ to the simplicial $k$-scheme associated to this cover, the result coincides on the nose with the bar construction for the classifying space of $Gal(k^{sep}/k)$.
I am not sure what happens for general fields.
ag.algebraic-geometry etale-covers
asked yesterday
rorirori
533
New contributor
rori is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $k$ be a field. In what generality is it true that higher etale homotopy groups
of $mathrm{Spec},k$ vanish?
If the absolute Galois group is finite, we have a universal cover $mathrm{Spec},k^{sep}rightarrowmathrm{Spec},k$ which, I believe, is the initial object of the category of etale hypercovers. If we apply $pi_0$ to the simplicial $k$-scheme associated to this cover, the result coincides on the nose with the bar construction for the classifying space of $Gal(k^{sep}/k)$.
I am not sure what happens for general fields.
ag.algebraic-geometry etale-covers
asked yesterday
rorirori
533
New contributor
rori is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Let $k$ be a field. In what generality is it true that higher etale homotopy groups
of $mathrm{Spec},k$ vanish?
If the absolute Galois group is finite, we have a universal cover $mathrm{Spec},k^{sep}rightarrowmathrm{Spec},k$ which, I believe, is the initial object of the category of etale hypercovers. If we apply $pi_0$ to the simplicial $k$-scheme associated to this cover, the result coincides on the nose with the bar construction for the classifying space of $Gal(k^{sep}/k)$.
I am not sure what happens for general fields.
ag.algebraic-geometry etale-covers
ag.algebraic-geometry etale-covers
asked yesterday
rorirori
533
New contributor
rori is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
rorirori
533
New contributor
rori is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
rorirori
533
New contributor
rori is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
rorirori
533
asked yesterday
rorirori
533
533
New contributor
rori is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
rori is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
rori is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The étale topos of a field $k$ is just the topos of sets with a continuous $mathrm{Gal}(k)$-action (here continuous is equivalent to all stabilizers being open), hence it is the colimit (in the ∞-category of topoi) of the topos of $mathrm{Gal}(k)/H$-sets where $H$ ranges through the open subgroups of $mathrm{Gal}(k)$.
Since the étale homotopy type commutes with (homotopy) colimits, we have that the étale homotopy type of $(mathrm{Spec},k)_{ét}$ is the homotopy colimit of $Bmathrm{Gal}(k)/H$, and so it is the profinite space usually written $Bmathrm{Gal}(k)$ or $K(mathrm{Gal}(k),1)$. In particular it has no higher homotopy groups.
answered yesterday
Denis NardinDenis Nardin
8,64723562
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
No need for $infty$-categories here :-)
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
@DavidRoberts Well sure. But there's no need to avoid them either :). Also I'm not sure if the étale homotopy type commutes with strict colimit (what would they even be in the target?), so I erred on the safe side. I know you can avoid ∞-cats by arguing that it is a cofinal family of hypercovers, but I decided that it wasn't worth the contorsions
$endgroup$
– Denis Nardin
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
I mean: the technology to compute colimits in the 2-category of toposes has been around a lot longer than colimits in $infty$-toposes (SGA4?), and easier to grasp and work with.
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
$begingroup$
@DavidRoberts Let's agree to disagree on what's easier to grasp and work with :). No discussion about it being earlier though (I think in this case they are essentially equivalent, my throwing the $infty$ there was mainly a little attempt to demistify the image of $infty$-cats as something esoteric).
$endgroup$
– Denis Nardin
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
I'm an Australian, 2-categories are my bag. Ah, well, I hope your attempt works :-)
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
rori is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f324715%2fdo-higher-etale-homotopy-groups-of-spectrum-of-a-field-always-vanish%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The étale topos of a field $k$ is just the topos of sets with a continuous $mathrm{Gal}(k)$-action (here continuous is equivalent to all stabilizers being open), hence it is the colimit (in the ∞-category of topoi) of the topos of $mathrm{Gal}(k)/H$-sets where $H$ ranges through the open subgroups of $mathrm{Gal}(k)$.
Since the étale homotopy type commutes with (homotopy) colimits, we have that the étale homotopy type of $(mathrm{Spec},k)_{ét}$ is the homotopy colimit of $Bmathrm{Gal}(k)/H$, and so it is the profinite space usually written $Bmathrm{Gal}(k)$ or $K(mathrm{Gal}(k),1)$. In particular it has no higher homotopy groups.
answered yesterday
Denis NardinDenis Nardin
8,64723562
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
No need for $infty$-categories here :-)
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
@DavidRoberts Well sure. But there's no need to avoid them either :). Also I'm not sure if the étale homotopy type commutes with strict colimit (what would they even be in the target?), so I erred on the safe side. I know you can avoid ∞-cats by arguing that it is a cofinal family of hypercovers, but I decided that it wasn't worth the contorsions
$endgroup$
– Denis Nardin
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
I mean: the technology to compute colimits in the 2-category of toposes has been around a lot longer than colimits in $infty$-toposes (SGA4?), and easier to grasp and work with.
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
$begingroup$
@DavidRoberts Let's agree to disagree on what's easier to grasp and work with :). No discussion about it being earlier though (I think in this case they are essentially equivalent, my throwing the $infty$ there was mainly a little attempt to demistify the image of $infty$-cats as something esoteric).
$endgroup$
– Denis Nardin
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
I'm an Australian, 2-categories are my bag. Ah, well, I hope your attempt works :-)
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The étale topos of a field $k$ is just the topos of sets with a continuous $mathrm{Gal}(k)$-action (here continuous is equivalent to all stabilizers being open), hence it is the colimit (in the ∞-category of topoi) of the topos of $mathrm{Gal}(k)/H$-sets where $H$ ranges through the open subgroups of $mathrm{Gal}(k)$.
Since the étale homotopy type commutes with (homotopy) colimits, we have that the étale homotopy type of $(mathrm{Spec},k)_{ét}$ is the homotopy colimit of $Bmathrm{Gal}(k)/H$, and so it is the profinite space usually written $Bmathrm{Gal}(k)$ or $K(mathrm{Gal}(k),1)$. In particular it has no higher homotopy groups.
answered yesterday
Denis NardinDenis Nardin
8,64723562
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
No need for $infty$-categories here :-)
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
@DavidRoberts Well sure. But there's no need to avoid them either :). Also I'm not sure if the étale homotopy type commutes with strict colimit (what would they even be in the target?), so I erred on the safe side. I know you can avoid ∞-cats by arguing that it is a cofinal family of hypercovers, but I decided that it wasn't worth the contorsions
$endgroup$
– Denis Nardin
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
I mean: the technology to compute colimits in the 2-category of toposes has been around a lot longer than colimits in $infty$-toposes (SGA4?), and easier to grasp and work with.
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
$begingroup$
@DavidRoberts Let's agree to disagree on what's easier to grasp and work with :). No discussion about it being earlier though (I think in this case they are essentially equivalent, my throwing the $infty$ there was mainly a little attempt to demistify the image of $infty$-cats as something esoteric).
$endgroup$
– Denis Nardin
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
I'm an Australian, 2-categories are my bag. Ah, well, I hope your attempt works :-)
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The étale topos of a field $k$ is just the topos of sets with a continuous $mathrm{Gal}(k)$-action (here continuous is equivalent to all stabilizers being open), hence it is the colimit (in the ∞-category of topoi) of the topos of $mathrm{Gal}(k)/H$-sets where $H$ ranges through the open subgroups of $mathrm{Gal}(k)$.
Since the étale homotopy type commutes with (homotopy) colimits, we have that the étale homotopy type of $(mathrm{Spec},k)_{ét}$ is the homotopy colimit of $Bmathrm{Gal}(k)/H$, and so it is the profinite space usually written $Bmathrm{Gal}(k)$ or $K(mathrm{Gal}(k),1)$. In particular it has no higher homotopy groups.
answered yesterday
Denis NardinDenis Nardin
8,64723562
$endgroup$
The étale topos of a field $k$ is just the topos of sets with a continuous $mathrm{Gal}(k)$-action (here continuous is equivalent to all stabilizers being open), hence it is the colimit (in the ∞-category of topoi) of the topos of $mathrm{Gal}(k)/H$-sets where $H$ ranges through the open subgroups of $mathrm{Gal}(k)$.
Since the étale homotopy type commutes with (homotopy) colimits, we have that the étale homotopy type of $(mathrm{Spec},k)_{ét}$ is the homotopy colimit of $Bmathrm{Gal}(k)/H$, and so it is the profinite space usually written $Bmathrm{Gal}(k)$ or $K(mathrm{Gal}(k),1)$. In particular it has no higher homotopy groups.
answered yesterday
Denis NardinDenis Nardin
8,64723562
answered yesterday
Denis NardinDenis Nardin
8,64723562
answered yesterday
Denis NardinDenis Nardin
8,64723562
answered yesterday
Denis NardinDenis Nardin
8,64723562
8,64723562
1
$begingroup$
No need for $infty$-categories here :-)
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
@DavidRoberts Well sure. But there's no need to avoid them either :). Also I'm not sure if the étale homotopy type commutes with strict colimit (what would they even be in the target?), so I erred on the safe side. I know you can avoid ∞-cats by arguing that it is a cofinal family of hypercovers, but I decided that it wasn't worth the contorsions
$endgroup$
– Denis Nardin
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
I mean: the technology to compute colimits in the 2-category of toposes has been around a lot longer than colimits in $infty$-toposes (SGA4?), and easier to grasp and work with.
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
$begingroup$
@DavidRoberts Let's agree to disagree on what's easier to grasp and work with :). No discussion about it being earlier though (I think in this case they are essentially equivalent, my throwing the $infty$ there was mainly a little attempt to demistify the image of $infty$-cats as something esoteric).
$endgroup$
– Denis Nardin
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
I'm an Australian, 2-categories are my bag. Ah, well, I hope your attempt works :-)
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
No need for $infty$-categories here :-)
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
@DavidRoberts Well sure. But there's no need to avoid them either :). Also I'm not sure if the étale homotopy type commutes with strict colimit (what would they even be in the target?), so I erred on the safe side. I know you can avoid ∞-cats by arguing that it is a cofinal family of hypercovers, but I decided that it wasn't worth the contorsions
$endgroup$
– Denis Nardin
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
I mean: the technology to compute colimits in the 2-category of toposes has been around a lot longer than colimits in $infty$-toposes (SGA4?), and easier to grasp and work with.
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
$begingroup$
@DavidRoberts Let's agree to disagree on what's easier to grasp and work with :). No discussion about it being earlier though (I think in this case they are essentially equivalent, my throwing the $infty$ there was mainly a little attempt to demistify the image of $infty$-cats as something esoteric).
$endgroup$
– Denis Nardin
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
I'm an Australian, 2-categories are my bag. Ah, well, I hope your attempt works :-)
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
No need for $infty$-categories here :-)
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
$begingroup$
No need for $infty$-categories here :-)
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
@DavidRoberts Well sure. But there's no need to avoid them either :). Also I'm not sure if the étale homotopy type commutes with strict colimit (what would they even be in the target?), so I erred on the safe side. I know you can avoid ∞-cats by arguing that it is a cofinal family of hypercovers, but I decided that it wasn't worth the contorsions
$endgroup$
– Denis Nardin
yesterday
$begingroup$
@DavidRoberts Well sure. But there's no need to avoid them either :). Also I'm not sure if the étale homotopy type commutes with strict colimit (what would they even be in the target?), so I erred on the safe side. I know you can avoid ∞-cats by arguing that it is a cofinal family of hypercovers, but I decided that it wasn't worth the contorsions
$endgroup$
– Denis Nardin
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
I mean: the technology to compute colimits in the 2-category of toposes has been around a lot longer than colimits in $infty$-toposes (SGA4?), and easier to grasp and work with.
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
$begingroup$
I mean: the technology to compute colimits in the 2-category of toposes has been around a lot longer than colimits in $infty$-toposes (SGA4?), and easier to grasp and work with.
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
$begingroup$
@DavidRoberts Let's agree to disagree on what's easier to grasp and work with :). No discussion about it being earlier though (I think in this case they are essentially equivalent, my throwing the $infty$ there was mainly a little attempt to demistify the image of $infty$-cats as something esoteric).
$endgroup$
– Denis Nardin
yesterday
$begingroup$
@DavidRoberts Let's agree to disagree on what's easier to grasp and work with :). No discussion about it being earlier though (I think in this case they are essentially equivalent, my throwing the $infty$ there was mainly a little attempt to demistify the image of $infty$-cats as something esoteric).
$endgroup$
– Denis Nardin
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
I'm an Australian, 2-categories are my bag. Ah, well, I hope your attempt works :-)
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
$begingroup$
I'm an Australian, 2-categories are my bag. Ah, well, I hope your attempt works :-)
$endgroup$
– David Roberts
yesterday
add a comment |
rori is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
rori is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
rori is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
rori is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f324715%2fdo-higher-etale-homotopy-groups-of-spectrum-of-a-field-always-vanish%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
