Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?What are some good exercises to prevent...
Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?
How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?
How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?
What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?
What's the output of a record cartridge playing an out-of-speed record
How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?
What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?
How to test if a transaction is standard without spending real money?
Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?
What does "Puller Prush Person" mean?
Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?
Is it important to consider tone, melody, and musical form while writing a song?
In Japanese, what’s the difference between “Tonari ni” (となりに) and “Tsugi” (つぎ)? When would you use one over the other?
Minkowski space
Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?
What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?
Theorems that impeded progress
The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server
Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?
Writing rule which states that two causes for the same superpower is bad writing
How to format long polynomial?
Python: next in for loop
Dragon forelimb placement
The magic money tree problem
Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?
What are some good exercises to prevent knee pain?Turbo training programs for long distance eventsbase training with or without added energy?Training for long distance rides (> 200km)Minimum training maximum outcomeIs it possible to get distance travelled without gpsDoes cycling without stretching make you shorter?Strength training during structured sweet spot base phase training planTraining weightsFasted training - is it worth it? Is it different when the focus is endurance?
I'm considering to do a 50-55 km distance on a mixed surface. Mostly asphalt and gravel, maybe even a little bit of sand. Haven't done any training or exercise, basically been sitting at home all day, everyday for years. Don't know why but suddenly had an urge to go on a journey.
My bicycle is quite old, 12 or so years, not in a great condition either but nothing is falling off so far. That wouldn't be my concern though, my concern is will my legs be able to cycle for 50 km in one go without any previous leg training. Is it advisable for me to do this? Will my legs be stiff after the first 10 km? What do you guys think?
Edit I'm 24. Last year I tried a 30 km distance, my legs were gone after 20 and I had to step off my bicycle and walk a bit, as it seemed easier than cycling. That was my only real exercise I've done in a couple of years.
I really have all day and can take as many rests as I want. I'd say I have a solid 8 hours. Is it doable if I go on a gear that doesn't require a lot of push?
touring training beginner injury endurance
New contributor
|
show 8 more comments
I'm considering to do a 50-55 km distance on a mixed surface. Mostly asphalt and gravel, maybe even a little bit of sand. Haven't done any training or exercise, basically been sitting at home all day, everyday for years. Don't know why but suddenly had an urge to go on a journey.
My bicycle is quite old, 12 or so years, not in a great condition either but nothing is falling off so far. That wouldn't be my concern though, my concern is will my legs be able to cycle for 50 km in one go without any previous leg training. Is it advisable for me to do this? Will my legs be stiff after the first 10 km? What do you guys think?
Edit I'm 24. Last year I tried a 30 km distance, my legs were gone after 20 and I had to step off my bicycle and walk a bit, as it seemed easier than cycling. That was my only real exercise I've done in a couple of years.
I really have all day and can take as many rests as I want. I'd say I have a solid 8 hours. Is it doable if I go on a gear that doesn't require a lot of push?
touring training beginner injury endurance
New contributor
8
Why not start with a smaller distance, or at least do a route that has some bail-out points in case you don't feel up to the full 50km?
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday
7
Call me overcautious but I would not do 50km on a bike that has been sitting around for a dozen years without having it properly checked and even have some vital parts replaced (tyres, tubes, cables and brake-pads a.o.)
– Carel
yesterday
3
@Carel I refuse! Your level of cautiousness is entirely appropriate. 😊
– David Richerby
yesterday
6
You'd do much better trying something like 5 km first - and try to do it without stopping. Don't push hard at all - riding a bicycle non-stop is not as easy as it might seem if your body isn't used to doing it.
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
9
Too short for a full answer: in addition to everyone else's points, if you haven't ridden a bike at all in years, you're going to get really saddle-sore pretty quickly.
– iamnotmaynard
yesterday
|
show 8 more comments
I'm considering to do a 50-55 km distance on a mixed surface. Mostly asphalt and gravel, maybe even a little bit of sand. Haven't done any training or exercise, basically been sitting at home all day, everyday for years. Don't know why but suddenly had an urge to go on a journey.
My bicycle is quite old, 12 or so years, not in a great condition either but nothing is falling off so far. That wouldn't be my concern though, my concern is will my legs be able to cycle for 50 km in one go without any previous leg training. Is it advisable for me to do this? Will my legs be stiff after the first 10 km? What do you guys think?
Edit I'm 24. Last year I tried a 30 km distance, my legs were gone after 20 and I had to step off my bicycle and walk a bit, as it seemed easier than cycling. That was my only real exercise I've done in a couple of years.
I really have all day and can take as many rests as I want. I'd say I have a solid 8 hours. Is it doable if I go on a gear that doesn't require a lot of push?
touring training beginner injury endurance
New contributor
I'm considering to do a 50-55 km distance on a mixed surface. Mostly asphalt and gravel, maybe even a little bit of sand. Haven't done any training or exercise, basically been sitting at home all day, everyday for years. Don't know why but suddenly had an urge to go on a journey.
My bicycle is quite old, 12 or so years, not in a great condition either but nothing is falling off so far. That wouldn't be my concern though, my concern is will my legs be able to cycle for 50 km in one go without any previous leg training. Is it advisable for me to do this? Will my legs be stiff after the first 10 km? What do you guys think?
Edit I'm 24. Last year I tried a 30 km distance, my legs were gone after 20 and I had to step off my bicycle and walk a bit, as it seemed easier than cycling. That was my only real exercise I've done in a couple of years.
I really have all day and can take as many rests as I want. I'd say I have a solid 8 hours. Is it doable if I go on a gear that doesn't require a lot of push?
touring training beginner injury endurance
touring training beginner injury endurance
New contributor
New contributor
edited 9 hours ago
Criggie♦
45k575151
45k575151
New contributor
asked yesterday
endofroadendofroad
3612
3612
New contributor
New contributor
8
Why not start with a smaller distance, or at least do a route that has some bail-out points in case you don't feel up to the full 50km?
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday
7
Call me overcautious but I would not do 50km on a bike that has been sitting around for a dozen years without having it properly checked and even have some vital parts replaced (tyres, tubes, cables and brake-pads a.o.)
– Carel
yesterday
3
@Carel I refuse! Your level of cautiousness is entirely appropriate. 😊
– David Richerby
yesterday
6
You'd do much better trying something like 5 km first - and try to do it without stopping. Don't push hard at all - riding a bicycle non-stop is not as easy as it might seem if your body isn't used to doing it.
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
9
Too short for a full answer: in addition to everyone else's points, if you haven't ridden a bike at all in years, you're going to get really saddle-sore pretty quickly.
– iamnotmaynard
yesterday
|
show 8 more comments
8
Why not start with a smaller distance, or at least do a route that has some bail-out points in case you don't feel up to the full 50km?
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday
7
Call me overcautious but I would not do 50km on a bike that has been sitting around for a dozen years without having it properly checked and even have some vital parts replaced (tyres, tubes, cables and brake-pads a.o.)
– Carel
yesterday
3
@Carel I refuse! Your level of cautiousness is entirely appropriate. 😊
– David Richerby
yesterday
6
You'd do much better trying something like 5 km first - and try to do it without stopping. Don't push hard at all - riding a bicycle non-stop is not as easy as it might seem if your body isn't used to doing it.
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
9
Too short for a full answer: in addition to everyone else's points, if you haven't ridden a bike at all in years, you're going to get really saddle-sore pretty quickly.
– iamnotmaynard
yesterday
8
8
Why not start with a smaller distance, or at least do a route that has some bail-out points in case you don't feel up to the full 50km?
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday
Why not start with a smaller distance, or at least do a route that has some bail-out points in case you don't feel up to the full 50km?
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday
7
7
Call me overcautious but I would not do 50km on a bike that has been sitting around for a dozen years without having it properly checked and even have some vital parts replaced (tyres, tubes, cables and brake-pads a.o.)
– Carel
yesterday
Call me overcautious but I would not do 50km on a bike that has been sitting around for a dozen years without having it properly checked and even have some vital parts replaced (tyres, tubes, cables and brake-pads a.o.)
– Carel
yesterday
3
3
@Carel I refuse! Your level of cautiousness is entirely appropriate. 😊
– David Richerby
yesterday
@Carel I refuse! Your level of cautiousness is entirely appropriate. 😊
– David Richerby
yesterday
6
6
You'd do much better trying something like 5 km first - and try to do it without stopping. Don't push hard at all - riding a bicycle non-stop is not as easy as it might seem if your body isn't used to doing it.
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
You'd do much better trying something like 5 km first - and try to do it without stopping. Don't push hard at all - riding a bicycle non-stop is not as easy as it might seem if your body isn't used to doing it.
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
9
9
Too short for a full answer: in addition to everyone else's points, if you haven't ridden a bike at all in years, you're going to get really saddle-sore pretty quickly.
– iamnotmaynard
yesterday
Too short for a full answer: in addition to everyone else's points, if you haven't ridden a bike at all in years, you're going to get really saddle-sore pretty quickly.
– iamnotmaynard
yesterday
|
show 8 more comments
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
A fit person can do 50km without too much difficulty, though they'll probably be sore from the effort if they don't cycle much, just because cycling uses different muscles to, say, running. It wouldn't be easy, but it wouldn't be too hard.
It sounds like you're not very fit. If you were determined, you could probably make it around 50km but I doubt it would be enjoyable at all. I suggest that you start with shorter distances. Try riding 10km and see how that feels. Once you can ride 20-25km fairly comfortably, doing 50km will be a nice challenge: not easy but an achievable goal that you can look back on with pride. Note that gravel and especially sand are more work to ride on than the equivalent distance on the road.
Since your bike's not been used for a while, you should get a bike shop to check it over. Depending on how much it was used and how it's been stored, it might need things like a new chain, new cables and new brake blocks. Possibly new tyres if they're in bad shape.
If you're going far from home, make sure you know how to repair a puncture (bring a spare inner tube so you don't have to use patches unless you puncture twice) and that you have a way of getting back if everything goes wrong. Rather than cycling to somewhere 25km away and then coming back, consider arranging your ride as more of a circle so there's a shorter route home if things don't go well.
Make sure you bring water and snacks with you, since your first 50km will probably take at least three hours.
Lets say my legs get wasted after 20 km, how long would i need to rest them before i can get back on my bicycle again and continue?
– endofroad
yesterday
1
@endofroad No idea -- it depends on how your body reacts to physical exertion. But if you're exhausted after 20km, you really won't want to do another 20km and then another 10km after that. And, unless you rest long enough that you're as fresh as you were when you set off (i.e., at least a day), you're not going to manage another 20km without getting exhausted and having to stop again.
– David Richerby
yesterday
11
@endofroad If you need to ask how long it will take for you to recuperate after a 20km ride, you aren't ready for a 50km ride.
– chepner
yesterday
Three hours plus at least an hour for breaks, more likely two hours. I'd plan time for at least 2 to 4 breaks on such a trip if I were new to biking. When I was a kid and my family went on biking journeys, we'd get an average about 10km/h including the breaks. We took our time, and we had fun with it because we didn't have much of a pressure to be quick. And that's the most important part: Always bike in a way so that it's fun for you. If you overdo it, you'll loose the fun, and consequently the interest to continue. Otherwise, this answer is spot on :-)
– cmaster
yesterday
1
Oh, and you might want to add this to your answer: Check that the saddle is high enough, or more generally, check whether the bike fits the rider. But saddle height is by far the most important imho. A saddle hight that allows the feet to reach the ground when seated feels like riding up a slope constantly, it really hurts the speed you can sustain. The correct height is when the forefoot is just able to reach the pedal comfortably throughout the entire stroke.
– cmaster
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
It's probably not a great idea. Start with a shorter route and see how you do. Pick a flat route without hills. Make sure you have a bail out and a way to get home (public transport, a friend, Uber etc.).
You probably should get a bike shop to have a look over your bike for any issues, you don't want to get stranded by something going wrong or have any safety issues.
How far and fast a new cyclist can go depends on a number of factors - how old they are, if they are overweight and by how much, genetic disposition, whether they were fit before becoming inactive.
add a comment |
To answer your questions -
- "Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training? -
Yes, it is possible, assuming by no previous training you mean
cycling training. If a person has been active in running or other
aerobic activity using their legs it is possible to ride 50 km
without any previous bicycle training. In your situation it may be
possible but it is less likely. - "Is it advisable for me to do this" - No, it is not advisable.
- Will my legs be stiff after the first 10 km? - Yes, your legs will be stiff.
All that aside, cycling is great fun.
You've had an urge to go riding - you should act on that, but ease into it. It's better to have several short rides with a positive. experience than one big one that wipes you out.
Argenti offers some great advice and there are lots of articles on how to ease into cycling.
Here is an example of a beginner's cycling plan.
add a comment |
My friend did 60 km previous weekend but he says it was a tough day. He does not exactly train but he is quite frequent casual rider. I would only take the challenge if it is possible to end the ride at few places along the route (at train stations, etc). You may also need to do this because of your old bike failing rather than you.
While the riding itself will probably take 5 hours at most, you may need to rest multiple times so start early and be sure lights are working.
add a comment |
Ok, I just joined this community to say I made 50km on a bike with my father when I was 12 years old without any training before.
New contributor
1
Great work. Could you expand your answer using edit? How old are you now? Is your fitness level similar to OPs? (ie relatively low) and could you do the same thing at your current age ?
– Criggie♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
I can share my own experience.
When I was young, maybe around twenty, I went to 50-60 km bicycle trip without previous training. Of course I occasionally used bicycle before.
After about 20 km my legs started tied up and I was forced to make some short stops (5-10 min) to recover.
So I was able to finish my trip, but it was hard.
Other time (maybe 10 years later) I did 90 km trip. Before this I used bicycle almost every day (5-10 km).
So I did this 90 km trip without problem (took me almost all day) and I didn't have problem except sunburn on my legs and arms.
Conclusion: it's possible to make long trip without training if you can stop and rest any time, but it could be much easy if you have some training before.
New contributor
add a comment |
Hills matter. 30 km can be a lot of different levels of effort, cuz the hills. Traffic can also make it somewhat more stressful. If you just inflate your tires and go, you'll probably be fine, if the hills are moderate and the traffic light. You should be prepared for some flat tires, and there's a fair chance you'll break a chain or do something worse, so you'll need a plan to get yourself and your bike back home if plan (a) fails.
Your legs won't be sore until the next day, and they'll be worse the day after that -- that's really what you'll get for being undertrained.
New contributor
2
If you just inflate your tires and go, you'll probably be fine Huh? What do you base that on? Have you ever tried to ride a bike any distance at all after years of "[h]aven't done any training or exercise, basically been sitting at home all day, everyday for years." I don't think it's reasonable to expect someone who literally hasn't done any exercise for years to be able to pedal a bicycle for the three+ hours it's going to take to go 50+ km.
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
2
And have you ever ridden a bike that hasn't been touched for more than a decade? (Regardless of how fresh you were at the time.) And, heck, I get sore much faster than the next day if I go for a hard ride.
– David Richerby
yesterday
I suspect OP is after the adventure of a ride, not the adventure of a failed ride. A bike safety check beforehand is pragmatic, and strongly recommended. A careful run through sustrans.org.uk/what-you-can-do/cycling/your-bike/… should show up any severe problems.
– Criggie♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "126"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
endofroad is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60157%2fis-it-possible-to-do-50-km-distance-without-any-previous-training%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
A fit person can do 50km without too much difficulty, though they'll probably be sore from the effort if they don't cycle much, just because cycling uses different muscles to, say, running. It wouldn't be easy, but it wouldn't be too hard.
It sounds like you're not very fit. If you were determined, you could probably make it around 50km but I doubt it would be enjoyable at all. I suggest that you start with shorter distances. Try riding 10km and see how that feels. Once you can ride 20-25km fairly comfortably, doing 50km will be a nice challenge: not easy but an achievable goal that you can look back on with pride. Note that gravel and especially sand are more work to ride on than the equivalent distance on the road.
Since your bike's not been used for a while, you should get a bike shop to check it over. Depending on how much it was used and how it's been stored, it might need things like a new chain, new cables and new brake blocks. Possibly new tyres if they're in bad shape.
If you're going far from home, make sure you know how to repair a puncture (bring a spare inner tube so you don't have to use patches unless you puncture twice) and that you have a way of getting back if everything goes wrong. Rather than cycling to somewhere 25km away and then coming back, consider arranging your ride as more of a circle so there's a shorter route home if things don't go well.
Make sure you bring water and snacks with you, since your first 50km will probably take at least three hours.
Lets say my legs get wasted after 20 km, how long would i need to rest them before i can get back on my bicycle again and continue?
– endofroad
yesterday
1
@endofroad No idea -- it depends on how your body reacts to physical exertion. But if you're exhausted after 20km, you really won't want to do another 20km and then another 10km after that. And, unless you rest long enough that you're as fresh as you were when you set off (i.e., at least a day), you're not going to manage another 20km without getting exhausted and having to stop again.
– David Richerby
yesterday
11
@endofroad If you need to ask how long it will take for you to recuperate after a 20km ride, you aren't ready for a 50km ride.
– chepner
yesterday
Three hours plus at least an hour for breaks, more likely two hours. I'd plan time for at least 2 to 4 breaks on such a trip if I were new to biking. When I was a kid and my family went on biking journeys, we'd get an average about 10km/h including the breaks. We took our time, and we had fun with it because we didn't have much of a pressure to be quick. And that's the most important part: Always bike in a way so that it's fun for you. If you overdo it, you'll loose the fun, and consequently the interest to continue. Otherwise, this answer is spot on :-)
– cmaster
yesterday
1
Oh, and you might want to add this to your answer: Check that the saddle is high enough, or more generally, check whether the bike fits the rider. But saddle height is by far the most important imho. A saddle hight that allows the feet to reach the ground when seated feels like riding up a slope constantly, it really hurts the speed you can sustain. The correct height is when the forefoot is just able to reach the pedal comfortably throughout the entire stroke.
– cmaster
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
A fit person can do 50km without too much difficulty, though they'll probably be sore from the effort if they don't cycle much, just because cycling uses different muscles to, say, running. It wouldn't be easy, but it wouldn't be too hard.
It sounds like you're not very fit. If you were determined, you could probably make it around 50km but I doubt it would be enjoyable at all. I suggest that you start with shorter distances. Try riding 10km and see how that feels. Once you can ride 20-25km fairly comfortably, doing 50km will be a nice challenge: not easy but an achievable goal that you can look back on with pride. Note that gravel and especially sand are more work to ride on than the equivalent distance on the road.
Since your bike's not been used for a while, you should get a bike shop to check it over. Depending on how much it was used and how it's been stored, it might need things like a new chain, new cables and new brake blocks. Possibly new tyres if they're in bad shape.
If you're going far from home, make sure you know how to repair a puncture (bring a spare inner tube so you don't have to use patches unless you puncture twice) and that you have a way of getting back if everything goes wrong. Rather than cycling to somewhere 25km away and then coming back, consider arranging your ride as more of a circle so there's a shorter route home if things don't go well.
Make sure you bring water and snacks with you, since your first 50km will probably take at least three hours.
Lets say my legs get wasted after 20 km, how long would i need to rest them before i can get back on my bicycle again and continue?
– endofroad
yesterday
1
@endofroad No idea -- it depends on how your body reacts to physical exertion. But if you're exhausted after 20km, you really won't want to do another 20km and then another 10km after that. And, unless you rest long enough that you're as fresh as you were when you set off (i.e., at least a day), you're not going to manage another 20km without getting exhausted and having to stop again.
– David Richerby
yesterday
11
@endofroad If you need to ask how long it will take for you to recuperate after a 20km ride, you aren't ready for a 50km ride.
– chepner
yesterday
Three hours plus at least an hour for breaks, more likely two hours. I'd plan time for at least 2 to 4 breaks on such a trip if I were new to biking. When I was a kid and my family went on biking journeys, we'd get an average about 10km/h including the breaks. We took our time, and we had fun with it because we didn't have much of a pressure to be quick. And that's the most important part: Always bike in a way so that it's fun for you. If you overdo it, you'll loose the fun, and consequently the interest to continue. Otherwise, this answer is spot on :-)
– cmaster
yesterday
1
Oh, and you might want to add this to your answer: Check that the saddle is high enough, or more generally, check whether the bike fits the rider. But saddle height is by far the most important imho. A saddle hight that allows the feet to reach the ground when seated feels like riding up a slope constantly, it really hurts the speed you can sustain. The correct height is when the forefoot is just able to reach the pedal comfortably throughout the entire stroke.
– cmaster
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
A fit person can do 50km without too much difficulty, though they'll probably be sore from the effort if they don't cycle much, just because cycling uses different muscles to, say, running. It wouldn't be easy, but it wouldn't be too hard.
It sounds like you're not very fit. If you were determined, you could probably make it around 50km but I doubt it would be enjoyable at all. I suggest that you start with shorter distances. Try riding 10km and see how that feels. Once you can ride 20-25km fairly comfortably, doing 50km will be a nice challenge: not easy but an achievable goal that you can look back on with pride. Note that gravel and especially sand are more work to ride on than the equivalent distance on the road.
Since your bike's not been used for a while, you should get a bike shop to check it over. Depending on how much it was used and how it's been stored, it might need things like a new chain, new cables and new brake blocks. Possibly new tyres if they're in bad shape.
If you're going far from home, make sure you know how to repair a puncture (bring a spare inner tube so you don't have to use patches unless you puncture twice) and that you have a way of getting back if everything goes wrong. Rather than cycling to somewhere 25km away and then coming back, consider arranging your ride as more of a circle so there's a shorter route home if things don't go well.
Make sure you bring water and snacks with you, since your first 50km will probably take at least three hours.
A fit person can do 50km without too much difficulty, though they'll probably be sore from the effort if they don't cycle much, just because cycling uses different muscles to, say, running. It wouldn't be easy, but it wouldn't be too hard.
It sounds like you're not very fit. If you were determined, you could probably make it around 50km but I doubt it would be enjoyable at all. I suggest that you start with shorter distances. Try riding 10km and see how that feels. Once you can ride 20-25km fairly comfortably, doing 50km will be a nice challenge: not easy but an achievable goal that you can look back on with pride. Note that gravel and especially sand are more work to ride on than the equivalent distance on the road.
Since your bike's not been used for a while, you should get a bike shop to check it over. Depending on how much it was used and how it's been stored, it might need things like a new chain, new cables and new brake blocks. Possibly new tyres if they're in bad shape.
If you're going far from home, make sure you know how to repair a puncture (bring a spare inner tube so you don't have to use patches unless you puncture twice) and that you have a way of getting back if everything goes wrong. Rather than cycling to somewhere 25km away and then coming back, consider arranging your ride as more of a circle so there's a shorter route home if things don't go well.
Make sure you bring water and snacks with you, since your first 50km will probably take at least three hours.
answered yesterday
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
13.3k33467
13.3k33467
Lets say my legs get wasted after 20 km, how long would i need to rest them before i can get back on my bicycle again and continue?
– endofroad
yesterday
1
@endofroad No idea -- it depends on how your body reacts to physical exertion. But if you're exhausted after 20km, you really won't want to do another 20km and then another 10km after that. And, unless you rest long enough that you're as fresh as you were when you set off (i.e., at least a day), you're not going to manage another 20km without getting exhausted and having to stop again.
– David Richerby
yesterday
11
@endofroad If you need to ask how long it will take for you to recuperate after a 20km ride, you aren't ready for a 50km ride.
– chepner
yesterday
Three hours plus at least an hour for breaks, more likely two hours. I'd plan time for at least 2 to 4 breaks on such a trip if I were new to biking. When I was a kid and my family went on biking journeys, we'd get an average about 10km/h including the breaks. We took our time, and we had fun with it because we didn't have much of a pressure to be quick. And that's the most important part: Always bike in a way so that it's fun for you. If you overdo it, you'll loose the fun, and consequently the interest to continue. Otherwise, this answer is spot on :-)
– cmaster
yesterday
1
Oh, and you might want to add this to your answer: Check that the saddle is high enough, or more generally, check whether the bike fits the rider. But saddle height is by far the most important imho. A saddle hight that allows the feet to reach the ground when seated feels like riding up a slope constantly, it really hurts the speed you can sustain. The correct height is when the forefoot is just able to reach the pedal comfortably throughout the entire stroke.
– cmaster
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
Lets say my legs get wasted after 20 km, how long would i need to rest them before i can get back on my bicycle again and continue?
– endofroad
yesterday
1
@endofroad No idea -- it depends on how your body reacts to physical exertion. But if you're exhausted after 20km, you really won't want to do another 20km and then another 10km after that. And, unless you rest long enough that you're as fresh as you were when you set off (i.e., at least a day), you're not going to manage another 20km without getting exhausted and having to stop again.
– David Richerby
yesterday
11
@endofroad If you need to ask how long it will take for you to recuperate after a 20km ride, you aren't ready for a 50km ride.
– chepner
yesterday
Three hours plus at least an hour for breaks, more likely two hours. I'd plan time for at least 2 to 4 breaks on such a trip if I were new to biking. When I was a kid and my family went on biking journeys, we'd get an average about 10km/h including the breaks. We took our time, and we had fun with it because we didn't have much of a pressure to be quick. And that's the most important part: Always bike in a way so that it's fun for you. If you overdo it, you'll loose the fun, and consequently the interest to continue. Otherwise, this answer is spot on :-)
– cmaster
yesterday
1
Oh, and you might want to add this to your answer: Check that the saddle is high enough, or more generally, check whether the bike fits the rider. But saddle height is by far the most important imho. A saddle hight that allows the feet to reach the ground when seated feels like riding up a slope constantly, it really hurts the speed you can sustain. The correct height is when the forefoot is just able to reach the pedal comfortably throughout the entire stroke.
– cmaster
yesterday
Lets say my legs get wasted after 20 km, how long would i need to rest them before i can get back on my bicycle again and continue?
– endofroad
yesterday
Lets say my legs get wasted after 20 km, how long would i need to rest them before i can get back on my bicycle again and continue?
– endofroad
yesterday
1
1
@endofroad No idea -- it depends on how your body reacts to physical exertion. But if you're exhausted after 20km, you really won't want to do another 20km and then another 10km after that. And, unless you rest long enough that you're as fresh as you were when you set off (i.e., at least a day), you're not going to manage another 20km without getting exhausted and having to stop again.
– David Richerby
yesterday
@endofroad No idea -- it depends on how your body reacts to physical exertion. But if you're exhausted after 20km, you really won't want to do another 20km and then another 10km after that. And, unless you rest long enough that you're as fresh as you were when you set off (i.e., at least a day), you're not going to manage another 20km without getting exhausted and having to stop again.
– David Richerby
yesterday
11
11
@endofroad If you need to ask how long it will take for you to recuperate after a 20km ride, you aren't ready for a 50km ride.
– chepner
yesterday
@endofroad If you need to ask how long it will take for you to recuperate after a 20km ride, you aren't ready for a 50km ride.
– chepner
yesterday
Three hours plus at least an hour for breaks, more likely two hours. I'd plan time for at least 2 to 4 breaks on such a trip if I were new to biking. When I was a kid and my family went on biking journeys, we'd get an average about 10km/h including the breaks. We took our time, and we had fun with it because we didn't have much of a pressure to be quick. And that's the most important part: Always bike in a way so that it's fun for you. If you overdo it, you'll loose the fun, and consequently the interest to continue. Otherwise, this answer is spot on :-)
– cmaster
yesterday
Three hours plus at least an hour for breaks, more likely two hours. I'd plan time for at least 2 to 4 breaks on such a trip if I were new to biking. When I was a kid and my family went on biking journeys, we'd get an average about 10km/h including the breaks. We took our time, and we had fun with it because we didn't have much of a pressure to be quick. And that's the most important part: Always bike in a way so that it's fun for you. If you overdo it, you'll loose the fun, and consequently the interest to continue. Otherwise, this answer is spot on :-)
– cmaster
yesterday
1
1
Oh, and you might want to add this to your answer: Check that the saddle is high enough, or more generally, check whether the bike fits the rider. But saddle height is by far the most important imho. A saddle hight that allows the feet to reach the ground when seated feels like riding up a slope constantly, it really hurts the speed you can sustain. The correct height is when the forefoot is just able to reach the pedal comfortably throughout the entire stroke.
– cmaster
yesterday
Oh, and you might want to add this to your answer: Check that the saddle is high enough, or more generally, check whether the bike fits the rider. But saddle height is by far the most important imho. A saddle hight that allows the feet to reach the ground when seated feels like riding up a slope constantly, it really hurts the speed you can sustain. The correct height is when the forefoot is just able to reach the pedal comfortably throughout the entire stroke.
– cmaster
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
It's probably not a great idea. Start with a shorter route and see how you do. Pick a flat route without hills. Make sure you have a bail out and a way to get home (public transport, a friend, Uber etc.).
You probably should get a bike shop to have a look over your bike for any issues, you don't want to get stranded by something going wrong or have any safety issues.
How far and fast a new cyclist can go depends on a number of factors - how old they are, if they are overweight and by how much, genetic disposition, whether they were fit before becoming inactive.
add a comment |
It's probably not a great idea. Start with a shorter route and see how you do. Pick a flat route without hills. Make sure you have a bail out and a way to get home (public transport, a friend, Uber etc.).
You probably should get a bike shop to have a look over your bike for any issues, you don't want to get stranded by something going wrong or have any safety issues.
How far and fast a new cyclist can go depends on a number of factors - how old they are, if they are overweight and by how much, genetic disposition, whether they were fit before becoming inactive.
add a comment |
It's probably not a great idea. Start with a shorter route and see how you do. Pick a flat route without hills. Make sure you have a bail out and a way to get home (public transport, a friend, Uber etc.).
You probably should get a bike shop to have a look over your bike for any issues, you don't want to get stranded by something going wrong or have any safety issues.
How far and fast a new cyclist can go depends on a number of factors - how old they are, if they are overweight and by how much, genetic disposition, whether they were fit before becoming inactive.
It's probably not a great idea. Start with a shorter route and see how you do. Pick a flat route without hills. Make sure you have a bail out and a way to get home (public transport, a friend, Uber etc.).
You probably should get a bike shop to have a look over your bike for any issues, you don't want to get stranded by something going wrong or have any safety issues.
How far and fast a new cyclist can go depends on a number of factors - how old they are, if they are overweight and by how much, genetic disposition, whether they were fit before becoming inactive.
answered yesterday
Argenti ApparatusArgenti Apparatus
37.3k23892
37.3k23892
add a comment |
add a comment |
To answer your questions -
- "Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training? -
Yes, it is possible, assuming by no previous training you mean
cycling training. If a person has been active in running or other
aerobic activity using their legs it is possible to ride 50 km
without any previous bicycle training. In your situation it may be
possible but it is less likely. - "Is it advisable for me to do this" - No, it is not advisable.
- Will my legs be stiff after the first 10 km? - Yes, your legs will be stiff.
All that aside, cycling is great fun.
You've had an urge to go riding - you should act on that, but ease into it. It's better to have several short rides with a positive. experience than one big one that wipes you out.
Argenti offers some great advice and there are lots of articles on how to ease into cycling.
Here is an example of a beginner's cycling plan.
add a comment |
To answer your questions -
- "Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training? -
Yes, it is possible, assuming by no previous training you mean
cycling training. If a person has been active in running or other
aerobic activity using their legs it is possible to ride 50 km
without any previous bicycle training. In your situation it may be
possible but it is less likely. - "Is it advisable for me to do this" - No, it is not advisable.
- Will my legs be stiff after the first 10 km? - Yes, your legs will be stiff.
All that aside, cycling is great fun.
You've had an urge to go riding - you should act on that, but ease into it. It's better to have several short rides with a positive. experience than one big one that wipes you out.
Argenti offers some great advice and there are lots of articles on how to ease into cycling.
Here is an example of a beginner's cycling plan.
add a comment |
To answer your questions -
- "Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training? -
Yes, it is possible, assuming by no previous training you mean
cycling training. If a person has been active in running or other
aerobic activity using their legs it is possible to ride 50 km
without any previous bicycle training. In your situation it may be
possible but it is less likely. - "Is it advisable for me to do this" - No, it is not advisable.
- Will my legs be stiff after the first 10 km? - Yes, your legs will be stiff.
All that aside, cycling is great fun.
You've had an urge to go riding - you should act on that, but ease into it. It's better to have several short rides with a positive. experience than one big one that wipes you out.
Argenti offers some great advice and there are lots of articles on how to ease into cycling.
Here is an example of a beginner's cycling plan.
To answer your questions -
- "Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training? -
Yes, it is possible, assuming by no previous training you mean
cycling training. If a person has been active in running or other
aerobic activity using their legs it is possible to ride 50 km
without any previous bicycle training. In your situation it may be
possible but it is less likely. - "Is it advisable for me to do this" - No, it is not advisable.
- Will my legs be stiff after the first 10 km? - Yes, your legs will be stiff.
All that aside, cycling is great fun.
You've had an urge to go riding - you should act on that, but ease into it. It's better to have several short rides with a positive. experience than one big one that wipes you out.
Argenti offers some great advice and there are lots of articles on how to ease into cycling.
Here is an example of a beginner's cycling plan.
answered yesterday
David DDavid D
4914
4914
add a comment |
add a comment |
My friend did 60 km previous weekend but he says it was a tough day. He does not exactly train but he is quite frequent casual rider. I would only take the challenge if it is possible to end the ride at few places along the route (at train stations, etc). You may also need to do this because of your old bike failing rather than you.
While the riding itself will probably take 5 hours at most, you may need to rest multiple times so start early and be sure lights are working.
add a comment |
My friend did 60 km previous weekend but he says it was a tough day. He does not exactly train but he is quite frequent casual rider. I would only take the challenge if it is possible to end the ride at few places along the route (at train stations, etc). You may also need to do this because of your old bike failing rather than you.
While the riding itself will probably take 5 hours at most, you may need to rest multiple times so start early and be sure lights are working.
add a comment |
My friend did 60 km previous weekend but he says it was a tough day. He does not exactly train but he is quite frequent casual rider. I would only take the challenge if it is possible to end the ride at few places along the route (at train stations, etc). You may also need to do this because of your old bike failing rather than you.
While the riding itself will probably take 5 hours at most, you may need to rest multiple times so start early and be sure lights are working.
My friend did 60 km previous weekend but he says it was a tough day. He does not exactly train but he is quite frequent casual rider. I would only take the challenge if it is possible to end the ride at few places along the route (at train stations, etc). You may also need to do this because of your old bike failing rather than you.
While the riding itself will probably take 5 hours at most, you may need to rest multiple times so start early and be sure lights are working.
answered yesterday
h22h22
31519
31519
add a comment |
add a comment |
Ok, I just joined this community to say I made 50km on a bike with my father when I was 12 years old without any training before.
New contributor
1
Great work. Could you expand your answer using edit? How old are you now? Is your fitness level similar to OPs? (ie relatively low) and could you do the same thing at your current age ?
– Criggie♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Ok, I just joined this community to say I made 50km on a bike with my father when I was 12 years old without any training before.
New contributor
1
Great work. Could you expand your answer using edit? How old are you now? Is your fitness level similar to OPs? (ie relatively low) and could you do the same thing at your current age ?
– Criggie♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Ok, I just joined this community to say I made 50km on a bike with my father when I was 12 years old without any training before.
New contributor
Ok, I just joined this community to say I made 50km on a bike with my father when I was 12 years old without any training before.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 9 hours ago
ElmoVanKielmoElmoVanKielmo
1011
1011
New contributor
New contributor
1
Great work. Could you expand your answer using edit? How old are you now? Is your fitness level similar to OPs? (ie relatively low) and could you do the same thing at your current age ?
– Criggie♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Great work. Could you expand your answer using edit? How old are you now? Is your fitness level similar to OPs? (ie relatively low) and could you do the same thing at your current age ?
– Criggie♦
9 hours ago
1
1
Great work. Could you expand your answer using edit? How old are you now? Is your fitness level similar to OPs? (ie relatively low) and could you do the same thing at your current age ?
– Criggie♦
9 hours ago
Great work. Could you expand your answer using edit? How old are you now? Is your fitness level similar to OPs? (ie relatively low) and could you do the same thing at your current age ?
– Criggie♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
I can share my own experience.
When I was young, maybe around twenty, I went to 50-60 km bicycle trip without previous training. Of course I occasionally used bicycle before.
After about 20 km my legs started tied up and I was forced to make some short stops (5-10 min) to recover.
So I was able to finish my trip, but it was hard.
Other time (maybe 10 years later) I did 90 km trip. Before this I used bicycle almost every day (5-10 km).
So I did this 90 km trip without problem (took me almost all day) and I didn't have problem except sunburn on my legs and arms.
Conclusion: it's possible to make long trip without training if you can stop and rest any time, but it could be much easy if you have some training before.
New contributor
add a comment |
I can share my own experience.
When I was young, maybe around twenty, I went to 50-60 km bicycle trip without previous training. Of course I occasionally used bicycle before.
After about 20 km my legs started tied up and I was forced to make some short stops (5-10 min) to recover.
So I was able to finish my trip, but it was hard.
Other time (maybe 10 years later) I did 90 km trip. Before this I used bicycle almost every day (5-10 km).
So I did this 90 km trip without problem (took me almost all day) and I didn't have problem except sunburn on my legs and arms.
Conclusion: it's possible to make long trip without training if you can stop and rest any time, but it could be much easy if you have some training before.
New contributor
add a comment |
I can share my own experience.
When I was young, maybe around twenty, I went to 50-60 km bicycle trip without previous training. Of course I occasionally used bicycle before.
After about 20 km my legs started tied up and I was forced to make some short stops (5-10 min) to recover.
So I was able to finish my trip, but it was hard.
Other time (maybe 10 years later) I did 90 km trip. Before this I used bicycle almost every day (5-10 km).
So I did this 90 km trip without problem (took me almost all day) and I didn't have problem except sunburn on my legs and arms.
Conclusion: it's possible to make long trip without training if you can stop and rest any time, but it could be much easy if you have some training before.
New contributor
I can share my own experience.
When I was young, maybe around twenty, I went to 50-60 km bicycle trip without previous training. Of course I occasionally used bicycle before.
After about 20 km my legs started tied up and I was forced to make some short stops (5-10 min) to recover.
So I was able to finish my trip, but it was hard.
Other time (maybe 10 years later) I did 90 km trip. Before this I used bicycle almost every day (5-10 km).
So I did this 90 km trip without problem (took me almost all day) and I didn't have problem except sunburn on my legs and arms.
Conclusion: it's possible to make long trip without training if you can stop and rest any time, but it could be much easy if you have some training before.
New contributor
edited 5 hours ago
New contributor
answered 8 hours ago
AlexanAlexan
1013
1013
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Hills matter. 30 km can be a lot of different levels of effort, cuz the hills. Traffic can also make it somewhat more stressful. If you just inflate your tires and go, you'll probably be fine, if the hills are moderate and the traffic light. You should be prepared for some flat tires, and there's a fair chance you'll break a chain or do something worse, so you'll need a plan to get yourself and your bike back home if plan (a) fails.
Your legs won't be sore until the next day, and they'll be worse the day after that -- that's really what you'll get for being undertrained.
New contributor
2
If you just inflate your tires and go, you'll probably be fine Huh? What do you base that on? Have you ever tried to ride a bike any distance at all after years of "[h]aven't done any training or exercise, basically been sitting at home all day, everyday for years." I don't think it's reasonable to expect someone who literally hasn't done any exercise for years to be able to pedal a bicycle for the three+ hours it's going to take to go 50+ km.
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
2
And have you ever ridden a bike that hasn't been touched for more than a decade? (Regardless of how fresh you were at the time.) And, heck, I get sore much faster than the next day if I go for a hard ride.
– David Richerby
yesterday
I suspect OP is after the adventure of a ride, not the adventure of a failed ride. A bike safety check beforehand is pragmatic, and strongly recommended. A careful run through sustrans.org.uk/what-you-can-do/cycling/your-bike/… should show up any severe problems.
– Criggie♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Hills matter. 30 km can be a lot of different levels of effort, cuz the hills. Traffic can also make it somewhat more stressful. If you just inflate your tires and go, you'll probably be fine, if the hills are moderate and the traffic light. You should be prepared for some flat tires, and there's a fair chance you'll break a chain or do something worse, so you'll need a plan to get yourself and your bike back home if plan (a) fails.
Your legs won't be sore until the next day, and they'll be worse the day after that -- that's really what you'll get for being undertrained.
New contributor
2
If you just inflate your tires and go, you'll probably be fine Huh? What do you base that on? Have you ever tried to ride a bike any distance at all after years of "[h]aven't done any training or exercise, basically been sitting at home all day, everyday for years." I don't think it's reasonable to expect someone who literally hasn't done any exercise for years to be able to pedal a bicycle for the three+ hours it's going to take to go 50+ km.
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
2
And have you ever ridden a bike that hasn't been touched for more than a decade? (Regardless of how fresh you were at the time.) And, heck, I get sore much faster than the next day if I go for a hard ride.
– David Richerby
yesterday
I suspect OP is after the adventure of a ride, not the adventure of a failed ride. A bike safety check beforehand is pragmatic, and strongly recommended. A careful run through sustrans.org.uk/what-you-can-do/cycling/your-bike/… should show up any severe problems.
– Criggie♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Hills matter. 30 km can be a lot of different levels of effort, cuz the hills. Traffic can also make it somewhat more stressful. If you just inflate your tires and go, you'll probably be fine, if the hills are moderate and the traffic light. You should be prepared for some flat tires, and there's a fair chance you'll break a chain or do something worse, so you'll need a plan to get yourself and your bike back home if plan (a) fails.
Your legs won't be sore until the next day, and they'll be worse the day after that -- that's really what you'll get for being undertrained.
New contributor
Hills matter. 30 km can be a lot of different levels of effort, cuz the hills. Traffic can also make it somewhat more stressful. If you just inflate your tires and go, you'll probably be fine, if the hills are moderate and the traffic light. You should be prepared for some flat tires, and there's a fair chance you'll break a chain or do something worse, so you'll need a plan to get yourself and your bike back home if plan (a) fails.
Your legs won't be sore until the next day, and they'll be worse the day after that -- that's really what you'll get for being undertrained.
New contributor
New contributor
answered yesterday
Ion FreemanIon Freeman
1071
1071
New contributor
New contributor
2
If you just inflate your tires and go, you'll probably be fine Huh? What do you base that on? Have you ever tried to ride a bike any distance at all after years of "[h]aven't done any training or exercise, basically been sitting at home all day, everyday for years." I don't think it's reasonable to expect someone who literally hasn't done any exercise for years to be able to pedal a bicycle for the three+ hours it's going to take to go 50+ km.
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
2
And have you ever ridden a bike that hasn't been touched for more than a decade? (Regardless of how fresh you were at the time.) And, heck, I get sore much faster than the next day if I go for a hard ride.
– David Richerby
yesterday
I suspect OP is after the adventure of a ride, not the adventure of a failed ride. A bike safety check beforehand is pragmatic, and strongly recommended. A careful run through sustrans.org.uk/what-you-can-do/cycling/your-bike/… should show up any severe problems.
– Criggie♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
2
If you just inflate your tires and go, you'll probably be fine Huh? What do you base that on? Have you ever tried to ride a bike any distance at all after years of "[h]aven't done any training or exercise, basically been sitting at home all day, everyday for years." I don't think it's reasonable to expect someone who literally hasn't done any exercise for years to be able to pedal a bicycle for the three+ hours it's going to take to go 50+ km.
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
2
And have you ever ridden a bike that hasn't been touched for more than a decade? (Regardless of how fresh you were at the time.) And, heck, I get sore much faster than the next day if I go for a hard ride.
– David Richerby
yesterday
I suspect OP is after the adventure of a ride, not the adventure of a failed ride. A bike safety check beforehand is pragmatic, and strongly recommended. A careful run through sustrans.org.uk/what-you-can-do/cycling/your-bike/… should show up any severe problems.
– Criggie♦
9 hours ago
2
2
If you just inflate your tires and go, you'll probably be fine Huh? What do you base that on? Have you ever tried to ride a bike any distance at all after years of "[h]aven't done any training or exercise, basically been sitting at home all day, everyday for years." I don't think it's reasonable to expect someone who literally hasn't done any exercise for years to be able to pedal a bicycle for the three+ hours it's going to take to go 50+ km.
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
If you just inflate your tires and go, you'll probably be fine Huh? What do you base that on? Have you ever tried to ride a bike any distance at all after years of "[h]aven't done any training or exercise, basically been sitting at home all day, everyday for years." I don't think it's reasonable to expect someone who literally hasn't done any exercise for years to be able to pedal a bicycle for the three+ hours it's going to take to go 50+ km.
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
2
2
And have you ever ridden a bike that hasn't been touched for more than a decade? (Regardless of how fresh you were at the time.) And, heck, I get sore much faster than the next day if I go for a hard ride.
– David Richerby
yesterday
And have you ever ridden a bike that hasn't been touched for more than a decade? (Regardless of how fresh you were at the time.) And, heck, I get sore much faster than the next day if I go for a hard ride.
– David Richerby
yesterday
I suspect OP is after the adventure of a ride, not the adventure of a failed ride. A bike safety check beforehand is pragmatic, and strongly recommended. A careful run through sustrans.org.uk/what-you-can-do/cycling/your-bike/… should show up any severe problems.
– Criggie♦
9 hours ago
I suspect OP is after the adventure of a ride, not the adventure of a failed ride. A bike safety check beforehand is pragmatic, and strongly recommended. A careful run through sustrans.org.uk/what-you-can-do/cycling/your-bike/… should show up any severe problems.
– Criggie♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
endofroad is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
endofroad is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
endofroad is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
endofroad is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Bicycles Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60157%2fis-it-possible-to-do-50-km-distance-without-any-previous-training%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
8
Why not start with a smaller distance, or at least do a route that has some bail-out points in case you don't feel up to the full 50km?
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday
7
Call me overcautious but I would not do 50km on a bike that has been sitting around for a dozen years without having it properly checked and even have some vital parts replaced (tyres, tubes, cables and brake-pads a.o.)
– Carel
yesterday
3
@Carel I refuse! Your level of cautiousness is entirely appropriate. 😊
– David Richerby
yesterday
6
You'd do much better trying something like 5 km first - and try to do it without stopping. Don't push hard at all - riding a bicycle non-stop is not as easy as it might seem if your body isn't used to doing it.
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
9
Too short for a full answer: in addition to everyone else's points, if you haven't ridden a bike at all in years, you're going to get really saddle-sore pretty quickly.
– iamnotmaynard
yesterday