Why doesn't the centrifugal force cause rotating dark halos to flatten?How can dark matter collapse without...
Dragon forelimb placement
can i play a electric guitar through a bass amp?
How to find program name(s) of an installed package?
How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?
Is this a crack on the carbon frame?
What does "Puller Prush Person" mean?
Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?
Font hinting is lost in Chrome-like browsers (for some languages )
A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?
Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?
Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?
How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?
How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?
Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distance
Arthur Somervell: 1000 Exercises - Meaning of this notation
Collect Fourier series terms
How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?
Which models of the Boeing 737 are still in production?
Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?
Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)
How to format long polynomial?
Why, historically, did Gödel think CH was false?
Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?
What do the dots in this tr command do: tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "JVPQBOV" (with 13 dots)
Why doesn't the centrifugal force cause rotating dark halos to flatten?
How can dark matter collapse without collisions or radiation?Why does dark matter form walls and filamentsIs there a binary black hole system in the middle of the galaxy?How does mirror matter account for the faster than expected spin of gallaxies?Distribution of dark matter in galactic halosDid dark matter cause the formation of the Solar System?How can I add dark matter to my $N$-body simulation?How dark matter makes ordinary matter far from the center of a disc galaxy rotate faster?Do galaxies have a halo of neutrinos and cosmic microwave background?Would calculating the relativistic mass of every particle in a Galaxy account for dark matter?If our galaxy's dark matter halo is so large and diffuse, why is the ordinary matter in it so much more localised and compactly located?
$begingroup$
Consider a spherical cloud of dark matter like the spherical halo around our galaxy. Please see the diagram below
Assuming that the halo is purely made up of dark matter which has only gravitational interaction and nothing else. Therefore, it cannot dissipate energy with time.
Now imagine the system is given a uniform rotation at $t=0$ about the axis shown in the figure.
Wouldn't such a motion cause the dark matter distribution to flatten out and take up the shape of a disc? After all, these dark matter particles will experience a centrifugal force. But this is not observed for the galactic halo. The halo retains its spherical shape even though the galaxy is rotating. What is wrong with my reasoning? Isn't the halo also expected to rotate like the visible matter in the galaxy?
cosmology astrophysics dark-matter
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a spherical cloud of dark matter like the spherical halo around our galaxy. Please see the diagram below
Assuming that the halo is purely made up of dark matter which has only gravitational interaction and nothing else. Therefore, it cannot dissipate energy with time.
Now imagine the system is given a uniform rotation at $t=0$ about the axis shown in the figure.
Wouldn't such a motion cause the dark matter distribution to flatten out and take up the shape of a disc? After all, these dark matter particles will experience a centrifugal force. But this is not observed for the galactic halo. The halo retains its spherical shape even though the galaxy is rotating. What is wrong with my reasoning? Isn't the halo also expected to rotate like the visible matter in the galaxy?
cosmology astrophysics dark-matter
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I would not discuss the flattening of colliding gas in terms of "centrifugal force". nI mean, you can, but I wouldn't advise it because I don't see it as a win for comprehension.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a spherical cloud of dark matter like the spherical halo around our galaxy. Please see the diagram below
Assuming that the halo is purely made up of dark matter which has only gravitational interaction and nothing else. Therefore, it cannot dissipate energy with time.
Now imagine the system is given a uniform rotation at $t=0$ about the axis shown in the figure.
Wouldn't such a motion cause the dark matter distribution to flatten out and take up the shape of a disc? After all, these dark matter particles will experience a centrifugal force. But this is not observed for the galactic halo. The halo retains its spherical shape even though the galaxy is rotating. What is wrong with my reasoning? Isn't the halo also expected to rotate like the visible matter in the galaxy?
cosmology astrophysics dark-matter
$endgroup$
Consider a spherical cloud of dark matter like the spherical halo around our galaxy. Please see the diagram below
Assuming that the halo is purely made up of dark matter which has only gravitational interaction and nothing else. Therefore, it cannot dissipate energy with time.
Now imagine the system is given a uniform rotation at $t=0$ about the axis shown in the figure.
Wouldn't such a motion cause the dark matter distribution to flatten out and take up the shape of a disc? After all, these dark matter particles will experience a centrifugal force. But this is not observed for the galactic halo. The halo retains its spherical shape even though the galaxy is rotating. What is wrong with my reasoning? Isn't the halo also expected to rotate like the visible matter in the galaxy?
cosmology astrophysics dark-matter
cosmology astrophysics dark-matter
edited yesterday
Kyle Oman
15.4k955111
15.4k955111
asked yesterday
SRSSRS
6,583433124
6,583433124
$begingroup$
I would not discuss the flattening of colliding gas in terms of "centrifugal force". nI mean, you can, but I wouldn't advise it because I don't see it as a win for comprehension.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would not discuss the flattening of colliding gas in terms of "centrifugal force". nI mean, you can, but I wouldn't advise it because I don't see it as a win for comprehension.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I would not discuss the flattening of colliding gas in terms of "centrifugal force". nI mean, you can, but I wouldn't advise it because I don't see it as a win for comprehension.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I would not discuss the flattening of colliding gas in terms of "centrifugal force". nI mean, you can, but I wouldn't advise it because I don't see it as a win for comprehension.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The premises of your question are false, according to current theory and measurements. Halos do rotate and their shapes are not spherical. Some references:
- Current constraints on the Milky Way dark halo shape from the orbits of globular clusters suggest an axis ratio of $sim 1.3$: Posti & Helmi (2019).
- The halo angular momentum has been theoretically well motivated for a long time: Hoyle (1949), Efstathiou & Jones (1979).
- The dimensionless halo spin parameter is $lambdasim0.035$, indicating that dark halos are mostly supported by dispersion (random motions) rather than rotation, so flattening into a disc is not expected, but a slight elongation is : Mo, van den Bosch & White (2010), p. 358-359 - this is a textbook reference, there are also many articles on this well-studied topic.
- There are also theoretically derived constraints on discs of dark matter that could in principle form by collecting within the stellar discs of galaxies. This seems not to be a very prevalent phenomenon, though: Schaller et al. (2016) - disclaimer, I am one of the authors.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Then, my question would be: why isn't the flattening as serious as that of the visible matter? I would like a simple argument, if possible.
$endgroup$
– SRS
yesterday
3
$begingroup$
@SRS ordinary matter radiates energy electromagnetically, allowing it to collapse much more than dark matter can. As it collapses, angular momentum is conserved and it spins faster and flattens out.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Oman
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470665%2fwhy-doesnt-the-centrifugal-force-cause-rotating-dark-halos-to-flatten%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The premises of your question are false, according to current theory and measurements. Halos do rotate and their shapes are not spherical. Some references:
- Current constraints on the Milky Way dark halo shape from the orbits of globular clusters suggest an axis ratio of $sim 1.3$: Posti & Helmi (2019).
- The halo angular momentum has been theoretically well motivated for a long time: Hoyle (1949), Efstathiou & Jones (1979).
- The dimensionless halo spin parameter is $lambdasim0.035$, indicating that dark halos are mostly supported by dispersion (random motions) rather than rotation, so flattening into a disc is not expected, but a slight elongation is : Mo, van den Bosch & White (2010), p. 358-359 - this is a textbook reference, there are also many articles on this well-studied topic.
- There are also theoretically derived constraints on discs of dark matter that could in principle form by collecting within the stellar discs of galaxies. This seems not to be a very prevalent phenomenon, though: Schaller et al. (2016) - disclaimer, I am one of the authors.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Then, my question would be: why isn't the flattening as serious as that of the visible matter? I would like a simple argument, if possible.
$endgroup$
– SRS
yesterday
3
$begingroup$
@SRS ordinary matter radiates energy electromagnetically, allowing it to collapse much more than dark matter can. As it collapses, angular momentum is conserved and it spins faster and flattens out.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Oman
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The premises of your question are false, according to current theory and measurements. Halos do rotate and their shapes are not spherical. Some references:
- Current constraints on the Milky Way dark halo shape from the orbits of globular clusters suggest an axis ratio of $sim 1.3$: Posti & Helmi (2019).
- The halo angular momentum has been theoretically well motivated for a long time: Hoyle (1949), Efstathiou & Jones (1979).
- The dimensionless halo spin parameter is $lambdasim0.035$, indicating that dark halos are mostly supported by dispersion (random motions) rather than rotation, so flattening into a disc is not expected, but a slight elongation is : Mo, van den Bosch & White (2010), p. 358-359 - this is a textbook reference, there are also many articles on this well-studied topic.
- There are also theoretically derived constraints on discs of dark matter that could in principle form by collecting within the stellar discs of galaxies. This seems not to be a very prevalent phenomenon, though: Schaller et al. (2016) - disclaimer, I am one of the authors.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Then, my question would be: why isn't the flattening as serious as that of the visible matter? I would like a simple argument, if possible.
$endgroup$
– SRS
yesterday
3
$begingroup$
@SRS ordinary matter radiates energy electromagnetically, allowing it to collapse much more than dark matter can. As it collapses, angular momentum is conserved and it spins faster and flattens out.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Oman
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The premises of your question are false, according to current theory and measurements. Halos do rotate and their shapes are not spherical. Some references:
- Current constraints on the Milky Way dark halo shape from the orbits of globular clusters suggest an axis ratio of $sim 1.3$: Posti & Helmi (2019).
- The halo angular momentum has been theoretically well motivated for a long time: Hoyle (1949), Efstathiou & Jones (1979).
- The dimensionless halo spin parameter is $lambdasim0.035$, indicating that dark halos are mostly supported by dispersion (random motions) rather than rotation, so flattening into a disc is not expected, but a slight elongation is : Mo, van den Bosch & White (2010), p. 358-359 - this is a textbook reference, there are also many articles on this well-studied topic.
- There are also theoretically derived constraints on discs of dark matter that could in principle form by collecting within the stellar discs of galaxies. This seems not to be a very prevalent phenomenon, though: Schaller et al. (2016) - disclaimer, I am one of the authors.
$endgroup$
The premises of your question are false, according to current theory and measurements. Halos do rotate and their shapes are not spherical. Some references:
- Current constraints on the Milky Way dark halo shape from the orbits of globular clusters suggest an axis ratio of $sim 1.3$: Posti & Helmi (2019).
- The halo angular momentum has been theoretically well motivated for a long time: Hoyle (1949), Efstathiou & Jones (1979).
- The dimensionless halo spin parameter is $lambdasim0.035$, indicating that dark halos are mostly supported by dispersion (random motions) rather than rotation, so flattening into a disc is not expected, but a slight elongation is : Mo, van den Bosch & White (2010), p. 358-359 - this is a textbook reference, there are also many articles on this well-studied topic.
- There are also theoretically derived constraints on discs of dark matter that could in principle form by collecting within the stellar discs of galaxies. This seems not to be a very prevalent phenomenon, though: Schaller et al. (2016) - disclaimer, I am one of the authors.
answered yesterday
Kyle OmanKyle Oman
15.4k955111
15.4k955111
$begingroup$
Then, my question would be: why isn't the flattening as serious as that of the visible matter? I would like a simple argument, if possible.
$endgroup$
– SRS
yesterday
3
$begingroup$
@SRS ordinary matter radiates energy electromagnetically, allowing it to collapse much more than dark matter can. As it collapses, angular momentum is conserved and it spins faster and flattens out.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Oman
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Then, my question would be: why isn't the flattening as serious as that of the visible matter? I would like a simple argument, if possible.
$endgroup$
– SRS
yesterday
3
$begingroup$
@SRS ordinary matter radiates energy electromagnetically, allowing it to collapse much more than dark matter can. As it collapses, angular momentum is conserved and it spins faster and flattens out.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Oman
yesterday
$begingroup$
Then, my question would be: why isn't the flattening as serious as that of the visible matter? I would like a simple argument, if possible.
$endgroup$
– SRS
yesterday
$begingroup$
Then, my question would be: why isn't the flattening as serious as that of the visible matter? I would like a simple argument, if possible.
$endgroup$
– SRS
yesterday
3
3
$begingroup$
@SRS ordinary matter radiates energy electromagnetically, allowing it to collapse much more than dark matter can. As it collapses, angular momentum is conserved and it spins faster and flattens out.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Oman
yesterday
$begingroup$
@SRS ordinary matter radiates energy electromagnetically, allowing it to collapse much more than dark matter can. As it collapses, angular momentum is conserved and it spins faster and flattens out.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Oman
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470665%2fwhy-doesnt-the-centrifugal-force-cause-rotating-dark-halos-to-flatten%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I would not discuss the flattening of colliding gas in terms of "centrifugal force". nI mean, you can, but I wouldn't advise it because I don't see it as a win for comprehension.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
2 hours ago