How do I prove this combinatorial identityAlternative combinatorial proof for...
Size of electromagnet needed to replicate Earth's magnetic field
How come there are so many candidates for the 2020 Democratic party presidential nomination?
How can I practically buy stocks?
Elements other than carbon that can form many different compounds by bonding to themselves?
Is there a way to generate a list of distinct numbers such that no two subsets ever have an equal sum?
Minor Revision with suggestion of an alternative proof by reviewer
Can an Area of Effect spell cast outside a Prismatic Wall extend inside it?
Could the terminal length of components like resistors be reduced?
How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?
What happened to Captain America in Endgame?
How to limit Drive Letters Windows assigns to new removable USB drives
Does a large simulator bay have standard public address announcements?
What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?
Apply MapThread to all but one variable
Can we say “you can pay when the order gets ready”?
A strange hotel
How to not starve gigantic beasts
Get consecutive integer number ranges from list of int
Pre-plastic human skin alternative
Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?
acheter à, to mean both "from" and "for"?
What is causing the white spot to appear in some of my pictures
How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?
Check if a string is entirely made of the same substring
How do I prove this combinatorial identity
Alternative combinatorial proof for $sumlimits_{r=0}^nbinom{n}{r}binom{m+r}{n}=sumlimits_{r=0}^nbinom{n}{r}binom{m}{r}2^r$Number of way to invite my friends over for dinner on 5 nightsHelp with how to prepare the inductive step of a strong induction exercise.Source and/or combinatorial interpretation for $F_{n+k} = sum_{i=0}^{k} binom{k}{i}F_{n-i}$Another combinatorial identity of McKayExpectation of the fraction a random function covers its rangeFind a conjecture for $F_1+F_2+…+F_n$Proof involving Fibonacci number and binomial coefficientCombinatorial proof of ${n choose 1} + {n choose 3} +cdots = {n choose 0} + {n choose 2}+cdots$Generating function of even Fibonacci numbers
$begingroup$
Show that ${2n choose n} + 3{2n-1 choose n} + 3^2{2n-2 choose n} + cdots + 3^n{n choose n} \ = {2n+1 choose n+1} + 2{2n+1 choose n+2} + 2^2{2n+1 choose n+3} + cdots + 2^n{2n+1 choose 2n+1}$
One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;
$$f_1 (x) = frac{1}{(1-3x)} \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac{1}{(1-x)^{n+1}} \ = {n choose n} + {n+1 choose n}x + {n+2 choose n}x^2 + cdots + {2n-1 choose n}x^{n-1} + {2n choose n}x^n + cdots + $$
Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.
Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.
Consider;
$$f_3 (x) = frac {1}{(1-2x)} \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^{n-1}x^{n-1} + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^{2n+1} \= 1 + {2n+1 choose 1}x + cdots + {2n+1 choose n-1}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n}x^n +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1} \ = {2n+1 choose 2n+1} + {2n+1 choose 2n}x + {2n+1 choose 2n-1}x^2 + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+2}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n+1}x^{n} + \
+ {2n+1 choose n}x^{n+1} +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1}$$
Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$
This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?
If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?
Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?
combinatorics induction binomial-coefficients generating-functions combinatorial-proofs
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Show that ${2n choose n} + 3{2n-1 choose n} + 3^2{2n-2 choose n} + cdots + 3^n{n choose n} \ = {2n+1 choose n+1} + 2{2n+1 choose n+2} + 2^2{2n+1 choose n+3} + cdots + 2^n{2n+1 choose 2n+1}$
One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;
$$f_1 (x) = frac{1}{(1-3x)} \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac{1}{(1-x)^{n+1}} \ = {n choose n} + {n+1 choose n}x + {n+2 choose n}x^2 + cdots + {2n-1 choose n}x^{n-1} + {2n choose n}x^n + cdots + $$
Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.
Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.
Consider;
$$f_3 (x) = frac {1}{(1-2x)} \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^{n-1}x^{n-1} + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^{2n+1} \= 1 + {2n+1 choose 1}x + cdots + {2n+1 choose n-1}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n}x^n +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1} \ = {2n+1 choose 2n+1} + {2n+1 choose 2n}x + {2n+1 choose 2n-1}x^2 + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+2}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n+1}x^{n} + \
+ {2n+1 choose n}x^{n+1} +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1}$$
Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$
This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?
If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?
Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?
combinatorics induction binomial-coefficients generating-functions combinatorial-proofs
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
yesterday
$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Show that ${2n choose n} + 3{2n-1 choose n} + 3^2{2n-2 choose n} + cdots + 3^n{n choose n} \ = {2n+1 choose n+1} + 2{2n+1 choose n+2} + 2^2{2n+1 choose n+3} + cdots + 2^n{2n+1 choose 2n+1}$
One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;
$$f_1 (x) = frac{1}{(1-3x)} \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac{1}{(1-x)^{n+1}} \ = {n choose n} + {n+1 choose n}x + {n+2 choose n}x^2 + cdots + {2n-1 choose n}x^{n-1} + {2n choose n}x^n + cdots + $$
Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.
Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.
Consider;
$$f_3 (x) = frac {1}{(1-2x)} \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^{n-1}x^{n-1} + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^{2n+1} \= 1 + {2n+1 choose 1}x + cdots + {2n+1 choose n-1}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n}x^n +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1} \ = {2n+1 choose 2n+1} + {2n+1 choose 2n}x + {2n+1 choose 2n-1}x^2 + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+2}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n+1}x^{n} + \
+ {2n+1 choose n}x^{n+1} +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1}$$
Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$
This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?
If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?
Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?
combinatorics induction binomial-coefficients generating-functions combinatorial-proofs
$endgroup$
Show that ${2n choose n} + 3{2n-1 choose n} + 3^2{2n-2 choose n} + cdots + 3^n{n choose n} \ = {2n+1 choose n+1} + 2{2n+1 choose n+2} + 2^2{2n+1 choose n+3} + cdots + 2^n{2n+1 choose 2n+1}$
One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;
$$f_1 (x) = frac{1}{(1-3x)} \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac{1}{(1-x)^{n+1}} \ = {n choose n} + {n+1 choose n}x + {n+2 choose n}x^2 + cdots + {2n-1 choose n}x^{n-1} + {2n choose n}x^n + cdots + $$
Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.
Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.
Consider;
$$f_3 (x) = frac {1}{(1-2x)} \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^{n-1}x^{n-1} + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^{2n+1} \= 1 + {2n+1 choose 1}x + cdots + {2n+1 choose n-1}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n}x^n +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1} \ = {2n+1 choose 2n+1} + {2n+1 choose 2n}x + {2n+1 choose 2n-1}x^2 + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+2}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n+1}x^{n} + \
+ {2n+1 choose n}x^{n+1} +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1}$$
Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$
This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?
If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?
Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?
combinatorics induction binomial-coefficients generating-functions combinatorial-proofs
combinatorics induction binomial-coefficients generating-functions combinatorial-proofs
edited yesterday
Andreas
8,5461137
8,5461137
asked 2 days ago
IcycarusIcycarus
5471315
5471315
$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
yesterday
$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
yesterday
$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
yesterday
$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
yesterday
$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
yesterday
$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
yesterday
$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
yesterday
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:
How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that
- at least one of the entries is a $2$, and
- there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?
LHS:
Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.
RHS:
Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
yesterday
5
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We seek to show that
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$
We have for the LHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$
The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
get for the RHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$
The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
and RHS.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using your functions, consider
$$
3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
$$
and further
$$
2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
$$
The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
$$
sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
yesterday
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3201479%2fhow-do-i-prove-this-combinatorial-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:
How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that
- at least one of the entries is a $2$, and
- there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?
LHS:
Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.
RHS:
Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
yesterday
5
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:
How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that
- at least one of the entries is a $2$, and
- there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?
LHS:
Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.
RHS:
Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
yesterday
5
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:
How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that
- at least one of the entries is a $2$, and
- there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?
LHS:
Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.
RHS:
Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.
$endgroup$
Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:
How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that
- at least one of the entries is a $2$, and
- there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?
LHS:
Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.
RHS:
Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.
answered yesterday
Mike EarnestMike Earnest
28.8k22256
28.8k22256
2
$begingroup$
How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
yesterday
5
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
yesterday
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
yesterday
5
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
yesterday
$begingroup$
How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
yesterday
5
5
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We seek to show that
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$
We have for the LHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$
The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
get for the RHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$
The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
and RHS.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We seek to show that
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$
We have for the LHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$
The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
get for the RHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$
The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
and RHS.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We seek to show that
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$
We have for the LHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$
The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
get for the RHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$
The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
and RHS.
$endgroup$
We seek to show that
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$
We have for the LHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$
The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
get for the RHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$
The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
and RHS.
answered yesterday
Marko RiedelMarko Riedel
41.8k341112
41.8k341112
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using your functions, consider
$$
3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
$$
and further
$$
2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
$$
The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
$$
sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
yesterday
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using your functions, consider
$$
3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
$$
and further
$$
2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
$$
The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
$$
sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
yesterday
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using your functions, consider
$$
3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
$$
and further
$$
2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
$$
The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
$$
sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
$$
$endgroup$
Using your functions, consider
$$
3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
$$
and further
$$
2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
$$
The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
$$
sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
$$
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
AndreasAndreas
8,5461137
8,5461137
2
$begingroup$
I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
yesterday
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
yesterday
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
yesterday
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
yesterday
$begingroup$
I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
yesterday
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
yesterday
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3201479%2fhow-do-i-prove-this-combinatorial-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
yesterday
$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
yesterday