How do I prove this combinatorial identityAlternative combinatorial proof for...

Size of electromagnet needed to replicate Earth's magnetic field

How come there are so many candidates for the 2020 Democratic party presidential nomination?

How can I practically buy stocks?

Elements other than carbon that can form many different compounds by bonding to themselves?

Is there a way to generate a list of distinct numbers such that no two subsets ever have an equal sum?

Minor Revision with suggestion of an alternative proof by reviewer

Can an Area of Effect spell cast outside a Prismatic Wall extend inside it?

Could the terminal length of components like resistors be reduced?

How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?

What happened to Captain America in Endgame?

How to limit Drive Letters Windows assigns to new removable USB drives

Does a large simulator bay have standard public address announcements?

What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?

Apply MapThread to all but one variable

Can we say “you can pay when the order gets ready”?

A strange hotel

How to not starve gigantic beasts

Get consecutive integer number ranges from list of int

Pre-plastic human skin alternative

Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?

acheter à, to mean both "from" and "for"?

What is causing the white spot to appear in some of my pictures

How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?

Check if a string is entirely made of the same substring



How do I prove this combinatorial identity


Alternative combinatorial proof for $sumlimits_{r=0}^nbinom{n}{r}binom{m+r}{n}=sumlimits_{r=0}^nbinom{n}{r}binom{m}{r}2^r$Number of way to invite my friends over for dinner on 5 nightsHelp with how to prepare the inductive step of a strong induction exercise.Source and/or combinatorial interpretation for $F_{n+k} = sum_{i=0}^{k} binom{k}{i}F_{n-i}$Another combinatorial identity of McKayExpectation of the fraction a random function covers its rangeFind a conjecture for $F_1+F_2+…+F_n$Proof involving Fibonacci number and binomial coefficientCombinatorial proof of ${n choose 1} + {n choose 3} +cdots = {n choose 0} + {n choose 2}+cdots$Generating function of even Fibonacci numbers













13












$begingroup$


Show that ${2n choose n} + 3{2n-1 choose n} + 3^2{2n-2 choose n} + cdots + 3^n{n choose n} \ = {2n+1 choose n+1} + 2{2n+1 choose n+2} + 2^2{2n+1 choose n+3} + cdots + 2^n{2n+1 choose 2n+1}$



One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;



$$f_1 (x) = frac{1}{(1-3x)} \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac{1}{(1-x)^{n+1}} \ = {n choose n} + {n+1 choose n}x + {n+2 choose n}x^2 + cdots + {2n-1 choose n}x^{n-1} + {2n choose n}x^n + cdots + $$



Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.



Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.



Consider;



$$f_3 (x) = frac {1}{(1-2x)} \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^{n-1}x^{n-1} + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^{2n+1} \= 1 + {2n+1 choose 1}x + cdots + {2n+1 choose n-1}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n}x^n +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1} \ = {2n+1 choose 2n+1} + {2n+1 choose 2n}x + {2n+1 choose 2n-1}x^2 + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+2}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n+1}x^{n} + \
+ {2n+1 choose n}x^{n+1} +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1}$$



Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$



This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?



If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?



Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Einar Rødland
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    yesterday
















13












$begingroup$


Show that ${2n choose n} + 3{2n-1 choose n} + 3^2{2n-2 choose n} + cdots + 3^n{n choose n} \ = {2n+1 choose n+1} + 2{2n+1 choose n+2} + 2^2{2n+1 choose n+3} + cdots + 2^n{2n+1 choose 2n+1}$



One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;



$$f_1 (x) = frac{1}{(1-3x)} \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac{1}{(1-x)^{n+1}} \ = {n choose n} + {n+1 choose n}x + {n+2 choose n}x^2 + cdots + {2n-1 choose n}x^{n-1} + {2n choose n}x^n + cdots + $$



Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.



Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.



Consider;



$$f_3 (x) = frac {1}{(1-2x)} \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^{n-1}x^{n-1} + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^{2n+1} \= 1 + {2n+1 choose 1}x + cdots + {2n+1 choose n-1}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n}x^n +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1} \ = {2n+1 choose 2n+1} + {2n+1 choose 2n}x + {2n+1 choose 2n-1}x^2 + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+2}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n+1}x^{n} + \
+ {2n+1 choose n}x^{n+1} +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1}$$



Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$



This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?



If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?



Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Einar Rødland
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    yesterday














13












13








13


5



$begingroup$


Show that ${2n choose n} + 3{2n-1 choose n} + 3^2{2n-2 choose n} + cdots + 3^n{n choose n} \ = {2n+1 choose n+1} + 2{2n+1 choose n+2} + 2^2{2n+1 choose n+3} + cdots + 2^n{2n+1 choose 2n+1}$



One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;



$$f_1 (x) = frac{1}{(1-3x)} \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac{1}{(1-x)^{n+1}} \ = {n choose n} + {n+1 choose n}x + {n+2 choose n}x^2 + cdots + {2n-1 choose n}x^{n-1} + {2n choose n}x^n + cdots + $$



Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.



Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.



Consider;



$$f_3 (x) = frac {1}{(1-2x)} \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^{n-1}x^{n-1} + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^{2n+1} \= 1 + {2n+1 choose 1}x + cdots + {2n+1 choose n-1}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n}x^n +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1} \ = {2n+1 choose 2n+1} + {2n+1 choose 2n}x + {2n+1 choose 2n-1}x^2 + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+2}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n+1}x^{n} + \
+ {2n+1 choose n}x^{n+1} +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1}$$



Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$



This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?



If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?



Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Show that ${2n choose n} + 3{2n-1 choose n} + 3^2{2n-2 choose n} + cdots + 3^n{n choose n} \ = {2n+1 choose n+1} + 2{2n+1 choose n+2} + 2^2{2n+1 choose n+3} + cdots + 2^n{2n+1 choose 2n+1}$



One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;



$$f_1 (x) = frac{1}{(1-3x)} \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac{1}{(1-x)^{n+1}} \ = {n choose n} + {n+1 choose n}x + {n+2 choose n}x^2 + cdots + {2n-1 choose n}x^{n-1} + {2n choose n}x^n + cdots + $$



Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.



Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.



Consider;



$$f_3 (x) = frac {1}{(1-2x)} \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^{n-1}x^{n-1} + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^{2n+1} \= 1 + {2n+1 choose 1}x + cdots + {2n+1 choose n-1}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n}x^n +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1} \ = {2n+1 choose 2n+1} + {2n+1 choose 2n}x + {2n+1 choose 2n-1}x^2 + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+2}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n+1}x^{n} + \
+ {2n+1 choose n}x^{n+1} +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1}$$



Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$



This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?



If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?



Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?







combinatorics induction binomial-coefficients generating-functions combinatorial-proofs






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Andreas

8,5461137




8,5461137










asked 2 days ago









IcycarusIcycarus

5471315




5471315












  • $begingroup$
    The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Einar Rødland
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    yesterday


















  • $begingroup$
    The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Einar Rødland
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    yesterday
















$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
yesterday




$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
yesterday












$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
yesterday




$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
yesterday










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















17












$begingroup$

Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:




How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that




  • at least one of the entries is a $2$, and

  • there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?




LHS:



Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.



RHS:



Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    yesterday






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
    $endgroup$
    – Mitch
    yesterday



















3












$begingroup$

We seek to show that



$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$



We have for the LHS



$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$



The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain



$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
get for the RHS



$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$



The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain



$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
and RHS.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Using your functions, consider
    $$
    3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
    $$

    and further
    $$
    2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
    $$

    The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
    $$
    sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
      $endgroup$
      – Andreas
      yesterday












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3201479%2fhow-do-i-prove-this-combinatorial-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    17












    $begingroup$

    Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:




    How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that




    • at least one of the entries is a $2$, and

    • there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?




    LHS:



    Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.



    RHS:



    Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
      $endgroup$
      – Icycarus
      yesterday






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      yesterday






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
      $endgroup$
      – Mitch
      yesterday
















    17












    $begingroup$

    Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:




    How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that




    • at least one of the entries is a $2$, and

    • there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?




    LHS:



    Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.



    RHS:



    Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
      $endgroup$
      – Icycarus
      yesterday






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      yesterday






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
      $endgroup$
      – Mitch
      yesterday














    17












    17








    17





    $begingroup$

    Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:




    How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that




    • at least one of the entries is a $2$, and

    • there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?




    LHS:



    Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.



    RHS:



    Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:




    How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that




    • at least one of the entries is a $2$, and

    • there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?




    LHS:



    Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.



    RHS:



    Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered yesterday









    Mike EarnestMike Earnest

    28.8k22256




    28.8k22256








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
      $endgroup$
      – Icycarus
      yesterday






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      yesterday






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
      $endgroup$
      – Mitch
      yesterday














    • 2




      $begingroup$
      How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
      $endgroup$
      – Icycarus
      yesterday






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      yesterday






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
      $endgroup$
      – Mitch
      yesterday








    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    yesterday




    5




    5




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    yesterday




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
    $endgroup$
    – Mitch
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
    $endgroup$
    – Mitch
    yesterday











    3












    $begingroup$

    We seek to show that



    $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
    = sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$



    We have for the LHS



    $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
    = sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
    \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$



    The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain



    $$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
    = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
    \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



    We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
    get for the RHS



    $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
    = sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
    \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$



    The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain



    $$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
    = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



    The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
    and RHS.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      We seek to show that



      $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
      = sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$



      We have for the LHS



      $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
      = sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
      \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$



      The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain



      $$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
      = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
      \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



      We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
      get for the RHS



      $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
      = sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
      \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$



      The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain



      $$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
      = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



      The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
      and RHS.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        We seek to show that



        $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
        = sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$



        We have for the LHS



        $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
        = sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
        \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$



        The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain



        $$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
        = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
        \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



        We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
        get for the RHS



        $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
        = sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
        \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$



        The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain



        $$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
        = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



        The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
        and RHS.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        We seek to show that



        $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
        = sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$



        We have for the LHS



        $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
        = sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
        \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$



        The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain



        $$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
        = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
        \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



        We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
        get for the RHS



        $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
        = sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
        \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$



        The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain



        $$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
        = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



        The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
        and RHS.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        Marko RiedelMarko Riedel

        41.8k341112




        41.8k341112























            2












            $begingroup$

            Using your functions, consider
            $$
            3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
            $$

            and further
            $$
            2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
            $$

            The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
            $$
            sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 2




              $begingroup$
              I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
              $endgroup$
              – Mike Earnest
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              @MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
              $endgroup$
              – Andreas
              yesterday
















            2












            $begingroup$

            Using your functions, consider
            $$
            3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
            $$

            and further
            $$
            2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
            $$

            The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
            $$
            sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 2




              $begingroup$
              I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
              $endgroup$
              – Mike Earnest
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              @MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
              $endgroup$
              – Andreas
              yesterday














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Using your functions, consider
            $$
            3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
            $$

            and further
            $$
            2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
            $$

            The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
            $$
            sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Using your functions, consider
            $$
            3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
            $$

            and further
            $$
            2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
            $$

            The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
            $$
            sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
            $$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited yesterday

























            answered yesterday









            AndreasAndreas

            8,5461137




            8,5461137








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
              $endgroup$
              – Mike Earnest
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              @MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
              $endgroup$
              – Andreas
              yesterday














            • 2




              $begingroup$
              I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
              $endgroup$
              – Mike Earnest
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              @MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
              $endgroup$
              – Andreas
              yesterday








            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
            $endgroup$
            – Mike Earnest
            yesterday




            $begingroup$
            I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
            $endgroup$
            – Mike Earnest
            yesterday












            $begingroup$
            @MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
            $endgroup$
            – Andreas
            yesterday




            $begingroup$
            @MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
            $endgroup$
            – Andreas
            yesterday


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3201479%2fhow-do-i-prove-this-combinatorial-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Couldn't open a raw socket. Error: Permission denied (13) (nmap)Is it possible to run networking commands...

            VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...

            Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll? Announcing the arrival of...