RS-485 using USART or UART port on STM32RS-485 / CAN signal levelsRS-485 isolation required?RS-485 Modbus...

Why avoid shared user accounts?

I have trouble understanding this fallacy: "If A, then B. Therefore if not-B, then not-A."

Does it take energy to move something in a circle?

Does diversity provide anything that meritocracy does not?

How is this property called for mod?

How can I prevent an oracle who can see into the past from knowing everything that has happened?

Sharepoint metadata URL

Equivalent of "illegal" for violating civil law

Illustrator to chemdraw

How much light is too much?

Memory usage: #define vs. static const for uint8_t

Stuck on a Geometry Puzzle

Why does 0.-5 evaluate to -5?

Can a player sacrifice a creature after declaring that creature as blocker while taking lethal damage?

Is there a file that always exists and a 'normal' user can't lstat it?

Plausible reason for gold-digging ant

Lightning Data Table inline edit

hrule into tikz circle node

A fantasy book with seven white haired women on the cover

Why didn't Tom Riddle take the presence of Fawkes and the Sorting Hat as more of a threat?

Concatenating two int[]

How to write cases in LaTeX?

Taking headphones when quitting job

What makes papers publishable in top-tier journals?



RS-485 using USART or UART port on STM32


RS-485 / CAN signal levelsRS-485 isolation required?RS-485 Modbus device to MCUSTM32 UART reliability with high baud rateUSB Specifications for PCB design.UART baudrate stepsCP2108 with level converter txb0108 - UART communication TTL and LVTTLUsing UART chip without programming control registersRepurposing FT232 UART pins as parallel outCan STM32F4 USART be used as UART?













2












$begingroup$


On STM32F405 MCUs there are USART ports as well as UART ports available. If I need to implement RS-485 communication then which one of these should be used, USART or UART? Or are both of them equally good for RS-485 communication?



I have searched through the datasheet as well as reference manual for the MCU, but it does not provide additional information regarding the RS-485 implementation.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why is this question tagged with "3.3v"? How is this relevant?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Mortensen
    5 hours ago
















2












$begingroup$


On STM32F405 MCUs there are USART ports as well as UART ports available. If I need to implement RS-485 communication then which one of these should be used, USART or UART? Or are both of them equally good for RS-485 communication?



I have searched through the datasheet as well as reference manual for the MCU, but it does not provide additional information regarding the RS-485 implementation.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why is this question tagged with "3.3v"? How is this relevant?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Mortensen
    5 hours ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


On STM32F405 MCUs there are USART ports as well as UART ports available. If I need to implement RS-485 communication then which one of these should be used, USART or UART? Or are both of them equally good for RS-485 communication?



I have searched through the datasheet as well as reference manual for the MCU, but it does not provide additional information regarding the RS-485 implementation.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




On STM32F405 MCUs there are USART ports as well as UART ports available. If I need to implement RS-485 communication then which one of these should be used, USART or UART? Or are both of them equally good for RS-485 communication?



I have searched through the datasheet as well as reference manual for the MCU, but it does not provide additional information regarding the RS-485 implementation.







stm32 uart rs485 3.3v






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Peter Mortensen

1,60031422




1,60031422










asked 13 hours ago









scico111scico111

356111




356111








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why is this question tagged with "3.3v"? How is this relevant?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Mortensen
    5 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why is this question tagged with "3.3v"? How is this relevant?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Mortensen
    5 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Why is this question tagged with "3.3v"? How is this relevant?
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Why is this question tagged with "3.3v"? How is this relevant?
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
5 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

It doesn't matter as even if you're using a USART (which provides an additional CLK pin for synchronous operation) you'll only be using the UART part (RXD/TXD). Keep in mind that you'll need an additional pin for the Data Enable signal.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    12 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    9 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f424220%2frs-485-using-usart-or-uart-port-on-stm32%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5












$begingroup$

It doesn't matter as even if you're using a USART (which provides an additional CLK pin for synchronous operation) you'll only be using the UART part (RXD/TXD). Keep in mind that you'll need an additional pin for the Data Enable signal.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    12 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    9 hours ago
















5












$begingroup$

It doesn't matter as even if you're using a USART (which provides an additional CLK pin for synchronous operation) you'll only be using the UART part (RXD/TXD). Keep in mind that you'll need an additional pin for the Data Enable signal.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    12 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    9 hours ago














5












5








5





$begingroup$

It doesn't matter as even if you're using a USART (which provides an additional CLK pin for synchronous operation) you'll only be using the UART part (RXD/TXD). Keep in mind that you'll need an additional pin for the Data Enable signal.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



It doesn't matter as even if you're using a USART (which provides an additional CLK pin for synchronous operation) you'll only be using the UART part (RXD/TXD). Keep in mind that you'll need an additional pin for the Data Enable signal.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 13 hours ago









Tom L.Tom L.

6,66011227




6,66011227








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    12 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    9 hours ago














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    12 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    9 hours ago








2




2




$begingroup$
If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
$endgroup$
– Toor
12 hours ago






$begingroup$
If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
$endgroup$
– Toor
12 hours ago






2




2




$begingroup$
@Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
$endgroup$
– CL.
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
$endgroup$
– CL.
9 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f424220%2frs-485-using-usart-or-uart-port-on-stm32%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Couldn't open a raw socket. Error: Permission denied (13) (nmap)Is it possible to run networking commands...

VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...

Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll? Announcing the arrival of...