IOmeter v/s FIO on Windows VMPerfTrack to measure system responsiveness to user actions in WindowsWhat...

How to approximate rolls for potions of healing using only d6's?

If I delete my router's history can my ISP still provide it to my parents?

How do Japanese speakers determine the implied topic when none has been mentioned?

What is Crew Dragon approaching in this picture?

Find the number of ways to express 1050 as sum of consecutive integers

What's a good word to describe a public place that looks like it wouldn't be rough?

Why didn't Eru and/or the Valar intervene when Sauron corrupted Númenor?

Can a person refuse a presidential pardon?

Do my Windows system binaries contain sensitive information?

How to acknowledge an embarrassing job interview, now that I work directly with the interviewer?

How to mitigate "bandwagon attacking" from players?

Am I a Rude Number?

How to use a mathematical expression as xticklable

When does coming up with an idea constitute sufficient contribution for authorship?

How do we edit a novel that's written by several people?

Criticizing long fiction. How is it different from short?

How to satisfy a player character's curiosity about another player character?

Why can I easily sing or whistle a tune I've just heard, but not as easily reproduce it on an instrument?

Wanted: 5.25 floppy to usb adapter

Quenching swords in dragon blood; why?

Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?

Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?

How to avoid being sexist when trying to employ someone to function in a very sexist environment?

Do commercial flights continue with an engine out?



IOmeter v/s FIO on Windows VM


PerfTrack to measure system responsiveness to user actions in WindowsWhat process manages disk storage in Windows?Benchmarking for Windows 2008 R2Windows software that display storage device using numbers and not lettersWhat are some optimal Windows 7 settings for maximizing a graphics card benchmark test?Windows 10 storage pool and hard drive recoveryBenchmarks like Antutu/GeekBench for Windows PC?Change memory size units in Windows 10Benchmarking Linux & WindowsWindows 10 System files bigger than C:Windows













0















I have a Windows VM which have disks on high performance storage. I have both FIO(http://bluestop.org/fio/) and IOmeter(http://www.iometer.org/) installed on it. I want to be able to saturate the disks to obtain max IOPs through FIO, but I see that FIO is not reaching the IOmeter IOPs level(FIO is showing around 100k IOPs lesser than IOmeter).



IOmeter config:




  • 1 worker per disk (8 disks)

  • 64 oio on each worker (iodepth)

  • 4k random writes (workload)

  • 4kb akigned IOs


FIO config:



[global]
rw=randread
rwmixread=100
blocksize=4096
blockalign=4096
ioengine=windowsaio
group_reporting=1
iodepth=64
description=fio 4KB random read 8disk
time_based=1
runtime=300
direct=1
numjobs=8 //Keeping it at 1 job per disk as in IOmeter gave even lower IOPs

[fio-job-01]
filename=\.PhysicalDrive1
[fio-job-02]
filename=\.PhysicalDrive2
[fio-job-03]
filename=\.PhysicalDrive3
[fio-job-04]
filename=\.PhysicalDrive4
[fio-job-05]
filename=\.PhysicalDrive5
[fio-job-06]
filename=\.PhysicalDrive6
[fio-job-07]
filename=\.PhysicalDrive7
[fio-job-08]
filename=\.PhysicalDrive8


Is there something that I can add in my FIO config to improve the IOPs?



Thanks.









share



























    0















    I have a Windows VM which have disks on high performance storage. I have both FIO(http://bluestop.org/fio/) and IOmeter(http://www.iometer.org/) installed on it. I want to be able to saturate the disks to obtain max IOPs through FIO, but I see that FIO is not reaching the IOmeter IOPs level(FIO is showing around 100k IOPs lesser than IOmeter).



    IOmeter config:




    • 1 worker per disk (8 disks)

    • 64 oio on each worker (iodepth)

    • 4k random writes (workload)

    • 4kb akigned IOs


    FIO config:



    [global]
    rw=randread
    rwmixread=100
    blocksize=4096
    blockalign=4096
    ioengine=windowsaio
    group_reporting=1
    iodepth=64
    description=fio 4KB random read 8disk
    time_based=1
    runtime=300
    direct=1
    numjobs=8 //Keeping it at 1 job per disk as in IOmeter gave even lower IOPs

    [fio-job-01]
    filename=\.PhysicalDrive1
    [fio-job-02]
    filename=\.PhysicalDrive2
    [fio-job-03]
    filename=\.PhysicalDrive3
    [fio-job-04]
    filename=\.PhysicalDrive4
    [fio-job-05]
    filename=\.PhysicalDrive5
    [fio-job-06]
    filename=\.PhysicalDrive6
    [fio-job-07]
    filename=\.PhysicalDrive7
    [fio-job-08]
    filename=\.PhysicalDrive8


    Is there something that I can add in my FIO config to improve the IOPs?



    Thanks.









    share

























      0












      0








      0








      I have a Windows VM which have disks on high performance storage. I have both FIO(http://bluestop.org/fio/) and IOmeter(http://www.iometer.org/) installed on it. I want to be able to saturate the disks to obtain max IOPs through FIO, but I see that FIO is not reaching the IOmeter IOPs level(FIO is showing around 100k IOPs lesser than IOmeter).



      IOmeter config:




      • 1 worker per disk (8 disks)

      • 64 oio on each worker (iodepth)

      • 4k random writes (workload)

      • 4kb akigned IOs


      FIO config:



      [global]
      rw=randread
      rwmixread=100
      blocksize=4096
      blockalign=4096
      ioengine=windowsaio
      group_reporting=1
      iodepth=64
      description=fio 4KB random read 8disk
      time_based=1
      runtime=300
      direct=1
      numjobs=8 //Keeping it at 1 job per disk as in IOmeter gave even lower IOPs

      [fio-job-01]
      filename=\.PhysicalDrive1
      [fio-job-02]
      filename=\.PhysicalDrive2
      [fio-job-03]
      filename=\.PhysicalDrive3
      [fio-job-04]
      filename=\.PhysicalDrive4
      [fio-job-05]
      filename=\.PhysicalDrive5
      [fio-job-06]
      filename=\.PhysicalDrive6
      [fio-job-07]
      filename=\.PhysicalDrive7
      [fio-job-08]
      filename=\.PhysicalDrive8


      Is there something that I can add in my FIO config to improve the IOPs?



      Thanks.









      share














      I have a Windows VM which have disks on high performance storage. I have both FIO(http://bluestop.org/fio/) and IOmeter(http://www.iometer.org/) installed on it. I want to be able to saturate the disks to obtain max IOPs through FIO, but I see that FIO is not reaching the IOmeter IOPs level(FIO is showing around 100k IOPs lesser than IOmeter).



      IOmeter config:




      • 1 worker per disk (8 disks)

      • 64 oio on each worker (iodepth)

      • 4k random writes (workload)

      • 4kb akigned IOs


      FIO config:



      [global]
      rw=randread
      rwmixread=100
      blocksize=4096
      blockalign=4096
      ioengine=windowsaio
      group_reporting=1
      iodepth=64
      description=fio 4KB random read 8disk
      time_based=1
      runtime=300
      direct=1
      numjobs=8 //Keeping it at 1 job per disk as in IOmeter gave even lower IOPs

      [fio-job-01]
      filename=\.PhysicalDrive1
      [fio-job-02]
      filename=\.PhysicalDrive2
      [fio-job-03]
      filename=\.PhysicalDrive3
      [fio-job-04]
      filename=\.PhysicalDrive4
      [fio-job-05]
      filename=\.PhysicalDrive5
      [fio-job-06]
      filename=\.PhysicalDrive6
      [fio-job-07]
      filename=\.PhysicalDrive7
      [fio-job-08]
      filename=\.PhysicalDrive8


      Is there something that I can add in my FIO config to improve the IOPs?



      Thanks.







      windows storage benchmarking





      share












      share










      share



      share










      asked 1 min ago









      nidHinidHi

      1112




      1112






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "3"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1411056%2fiometer-v-s-fio-on-windows-vm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1411056%2fiometer-v-s-fio-on-windows-vm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll? Announcing the arrival of...

          Couldn't open a raw socket. Error: Permission denied (13) (nmap)Is it possible to run networking commands...

          VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...