Tjyylli

Single word request: Harming the benefactor

Why doesn't the EU now just force the UK to choose between referendum and no-deal?

Can the druid cantrip Thorn Whip really defeat a water weird this easily?

what does the apostrophe mean in this notation?

What has been your most complicated TikZ drawing?

Is King K. Rool's down throw to up-special a true combo?

How could our ancestors have domesticated a solitary predator?

What is the probability somebody's birthday is the day before mine?

Is it illegal in Germany to take sick leave if you caused your own illness with food?

What happens with multiple copies of Humility and Glorious Anthem on the battlefield?

Are there situations where a child is permitted to refer to their parent by their first name?

Time dilation for a moving electronic clock

Question about partial fractions with irreducible quadratic factors

What Happens when Passenger Refuses to Fly Boeing 737 Max?

How do anti-virus programs start at Windows boot?

Deleting missing values from a dataset

Do I need to leave some extra space available on the disk which my database log files reside, for log backup operations to successfully occur?

Unreachable code, but reachable with exception

Format picture and text with TikZ and minipage

What is the difference between "shut" and "close"?

Straight line with arrows and dots

What exactly is the purpose of connection links straped between the rocket and the launch pad

Want to switch to tankless, but can I use my existing wiring?

What to do when during a meeting client people start to fight (even physically) with each others?

Does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?

3

Linux supports many file systems (for example: ext3, NTFS, FAT32, etc.).

The following diagram shows how Linux allows a process to access files:

So assume that a process called the read() system call to read a file, what will happen is that the VFS layer will be accessed, and the VFS layer will decide which file system driver to access based on the file system of the partition that the file to be read resides on.

Linux provides many system calls to access files (for example: read(), write(), rename(), etc.).

Now read() and write() and rename() work on all the file systems that Linux supports.

But there are specific features that exist only on some file systems while not existing on others. For example: on a NTFS file system, you can set the Archive bit for a file, while this can't be done on an ext3 file system.

Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports? for example: does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?

linux filesystems

share|improve this question

asked 2 hours ago

user341642user341642

161

New contributor

user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

3

Linux supports many file systems (for example: ext3, NTFS, FAT32, etc.).

The following diagram shows how Linux allows a process to access files:

So assume that a process called the read() system call to read a file, what will happen is that the VFS layer will be accessed, and the VFS layer will decide which file system driver to access based on the file system of the partition that the file to be read resides on.

Linux provides many system calls to access files (for example: read(), write(), rename(), etc.).

Now read() and write() and rename() work on all the file systems that Linux supports.

But there are specific features that exist only on some file systems while not existing on others. For example: on a NTFS file system, you can set the Archive bit for a file, while this can't be done on an ext3 file system.

Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports? for example: does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?

linux filesystems

share|improve this question

asked 2 hours ago

user341642user341642

161

New contributor

user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

Linux supports many file systems (for example: ext3, NTFS, FAT32, etc.).

The following diagram shows how Linux allows a process to access files:

So assume that a process called the read() system call to read a file, what will happen is that the VFS layer will be accessed, and the VFS layer will decide which file system driver to access based on the file system of the partition that the file to be read resides on.

Linux provides many system calls to access files (for example: read(), write(), rename(), etc.).

Now read() and write() and rename() work on all the file systems that Linux supports.

But there are specific features that exist only on some file systems while not existing on others. For example: on a NTFS file system, you can set the Archive bit for a file, while this can't be done on an ext3 file system.

Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports? for example: does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?

linux filesystems

share|improve this question

asked 2 hours ago

user341642user341642

161

New contributor

user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

asked 2 hours ago

user341642user341642

161

New contributor

user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

asked 2 hours ago

user341642user341642

161

New contributor

user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 2 hours ago

user341642user341642

161

New contributor

user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 2 hours ago

user341642user341642

161

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

4

does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?

For this particular case, the ntfs-3g driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?

The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl() function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2). (ioctl() is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)

Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?

It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.

It should be supported now, with the statx() system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.

Related:

• Birth is empty on ext4


• A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3
  

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

answered 2 hours ago

ilkkachuilkkachu

61.1k1099175

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
  
  – Uncle Billy
  2 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention of statx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.
  
  – Stephen Kitt
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
  
  – ilkkachu
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

user341642 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506160%2fdoes-linux-have-system-calls-to-access-all-the-features-of-the-file-systems-it-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

4

does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?

For this particular case, the ntfs-3g driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?

The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl() function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2). (ioctl() is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)

Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?

It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.

It should be supported now, with the statx() system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.

Related:

• Birth is empty on ext4


• A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3
  

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

answered 2 hours ago

ilkkachuilkkachu

61.1k1099175

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
  
  – Uncle Billy
  2 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention of statx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.
  
  – Stephen Kitt
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
  
  – ilkkachu
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

4

does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?

For this particular case, the ntfs-3g driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?

The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl() function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2). (ioctl() is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)

Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?

It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.

It should be supported now, with the statx() system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.

Related:

• Birth is empty on ext4


• A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3
  

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

answered 2 hours ago

ilkkachuilkkachu

61.1k1099175

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
  
  – Uncle Billy
  2 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention of statx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.
  
  – Stephen Kitt
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
  
  – ilkkachu
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?

For this particular case, the ntfs-3g driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?

The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl() function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2). (ioctl() is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)

Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?

It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.

It should be supported now, with the statx() system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.

Related:

• Birth is empty on ext4


• A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3
  

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

answered 2 hours ago

ilkkachuilkkachu

61.1k1099175

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

answered 2 hours ago

ilkkachuilkkachu

61.1k1099175

answered 2 hours ago

ilkkachuilkkachu

61.1k1099175

answered 2 hours ago

ilkkachuilkkachu

61.1k1099175