Extension of Splitting Fields over An Arbitrary FieldSplitting field implies Galois extensionWhat does it...
Is a lawful good "antagonist" effective?
How to make readers know that my work has used a hidden constraint?
what does the apostrophe mean in this notation?
Deleting missing values from a dataset
If the Captain's screens are out, does he switch seats with the co-pilot?
Running a subshell from the middle of the current command
Why do Australian milk farmers need to protest supermarkets' milk price?
How could a female member of a species produce eggs unto death?
Does splitting a potentially monolithic application into several smaller ones help prevent bugs?
Does the Bracer of Flying Daggers benefit from the Dueling fighting style?
What is the dot in “1.2.4."
When two POV characters meet
"One can do his homework in the library"
validation vs test vs training accuracy, which one to compare for claiming overfit?
Coworker uses her breast-pump everywhere in the office
Is having access to past exams cheating and, if yes, could it be proven just by a good grade?
Extension of Splitting Fields over An Arbitrary Field
Why doesn't the EU now just force the UK to choose between referendum and no-deal?
Rejected in 4th interview round citing insufficient years of experience
Is it ok to include an epilogue dedicated to colleagues who passed away in the end of the manuscript?
Examples of odd-dimensional manifolds that do not admit contact structure
If Invisibility ends because the original caster casts a non-concentration spell, does Invisibility also end on other targets of the original casting?
Is it true that real estate prices mainly go up?
How to deal with a cynical class?
Extension of Splitting Fields over An Arbitrary Field
Splitting field implies Galois extensionWhat does it mean to take the splitting field of $f(x)in F[x]$ over $K$ where $K/F$ is a field extensionCalculating Splitting Field Degree of ExtensionDetermining whether or not an extension is a splitting fieldElementary Field Theory: Extension Field of Degree 2Splitting field of $x^3 - 2$ over $mathbb{F}_5$Normal field extension implies splitting fieldSplitting fields and their degreesWhat things we have to take care of while finding the degree of field extension, splitting fields for some polynomial?A question on the definition of splitting field
$begingroup$
Let $F$ be a field in which $0 neq2$ in $F$, and consider $f=x^4+1$. If $E$ is the splitting field for $f$ over $F$, it turns out that $E$ is a simple extension of $F$. How does one realize this fact? I'm not so sure as to what field element I can adjoin to $F$ to allow $f$ to split into linear factors. Finding the splitting field over something like $mathbb{Q}$ is straight forward and easy in comparison, but I'm having trouble working with any general field $F$.
Also, if we indeed did have that $0=2$ in our field $F$, then $f=x^4+1=(x+1)^4$, so $F$ is its own splitting field, is this correct reasoning?
abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field splitting-field
asked 1 hour ago
DevilofHell'sKitchenDevilofHell'sKitchen
405
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $F$ be a field in which $0 neq2$ in $F$, and consider $f=x^4+1$. If $E$ is the splitting field for $f$ over $F$, it turns out that $E$ is a simple extension of $F$. How does one realize this fact? I'm not so sure as to what field element I can adjoin to $F$ to allow $f$ to split into linear factors. Finding the splitting field over something like $mathbb{Q}$ is straight forward and easy in comparison, but I'm having trouble working with any general field $F$.
Also, if we indeed did have that $0=2$ in our field $F$, then $f=x^4+1=(x+1)^4$, so $F$ is its own splitting field, is this correct reasoning?
abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field splitting-field
asked 1 hour ago
DevilofHell'sKitchenDevilofHell'sKitchen
405
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Letting $alpha$ be any root, then $f$ splits as $(x-alpha)(x+alpha)(x-alpha^3)(x+alpha^3)$ in $F[alpha]$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $F$ be a field in which $0 neq2$ in $F$, and consider $f=x^4+1$. If $E$ is the splitting field for $f$ over $F$, it turns out that $E$ is a simple extension of $F$. How does one realize this fact? I'm not so sure as to what field element I can adjoin to $F$ to allow $f$ to split into linear factors. Finding the splitting field over something like $mathbb{Q}$ is straight forward and easy in comparison, but I'm having trouble working with any general field $F$.
Also, if we indeed did have that $0=2$ in our field $F$, then $f=x^4+1=(x+1)^4$, so $F$ is its own splitting field, is this correct reasoning?
abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field splitting-field
asked 1 hour ago
DevilofHell'sKitchenDevilofHell'sKitchen
405
$endgroup$
Let $F$ be a field in which $0 neq2$ in $F$, and consider $f=x^4+1$. If $E$ is the splitting field for $f$ over $F$, it turns out that $E$ is a simple extension of $F$. How does one realize this fact? I'm not so sure as to what field element I can adjoin to $F$ to allow $f$ to split into linear factors. Finding the splitting field over something like $mathbb{Q}$ is straight forward and easy in comparison, but I'm having trouble working with any general field $F$.
Also, if we indeed did have that $0=2$ in our field $F$, then $f=x^4+1=(x+1)^4$, so $F$ is its own splitting field, is this correct reasoning?
abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field splitting-field
abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field splitting-field
asked 1 hour ago
DevilofHell'sKitchenDevilofHell'sKitchen
405
asked 1 hour ago
DevilofHell'sKitchenDevilofHell'sKitchen
405
asked 1 hour ago
DevilofHell'sKitchenDevilofHell'sKitchen
405
asked 1 hour ago
DevilofHell'sKitchenDevilofHell'sKitchen
405
asked 1 hour ago
DevilofHell'sKitchenDevilofHell'sKitchen
405
405
2
$begingroup$
Letting $alpha$ be any root, then $f$ splits as $(x-alpha)(x+alpha)(x-alpha^3)(x+alpha^3)$ in $F[alpha]$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Letting $alpha$ be any root, then $f$ splits as $(x-alpha)(x+alpha)(x-alpha^3)(x+alpha^3)$ in $F[alpha]$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
1 hour ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Letting $alpha$ be any root, then $f$ splits as $(x-alpha)(x+alpha)(x-alpha^3)(x+alpha^3)$ in $F[alpha]$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Letting $alpha$ be any root, then $f$ splits as $(x-alpha)(x+alpha)(x-alpha^3)(x+alpha^3)$ in $F[alpha]$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $theta$ is a root of $x^4+1$, then so are $theta^k$ for $k=1,3,5,7$, and so $x^4+1$ splits in $F(theta)$.
answered 1 hour ago
lhflhf
166k10171400
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
And those powers of $theta$ are distinct elements of the field.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
56 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147449%2fextension-of-splitting-fields-over-an-arbitrary-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $theta$ is a root of $x^4+1$, then so are $theta^k$ for $k=1,3,5,7$, and so $x^4+1$ splits in $F(theta)$.
answered 1 hour ago
lhflhf
166k10171400
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
And those powers of $theta$ are distinct elements of the field.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
56 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $theta$ is a root of $x^4+1$, then so are $theta^k$ for $k=1,3,5,7$, and so $x^4+1$ splits in $F(theta)$.
answered 1 hour ago
lhflhf
166k10171400
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
And those powers of $theta$ are distinct elements of the field.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
56 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $theta$ is a root of $x^4+1$, then so are $theta^k$ for $k=1,3,5,7$, and so $x^4+1$ splits in $F(theta)$.
answered 1 hour ago
lhflhf
166k10171400
$endgroup$
If $theta$ is a root of $x^4+1$, then so are $theta^k$ for $k=1,3,5,7$, and so $x^4+1$ splits in $F(theta)$.
answered 1 hour ago
lhflhf
166k10171400
answered 1 hour ago
lhflhf
166k10171400
answered 1 hour ago
lhflhf
166k10171400
answered 1 hour ago
lhflhf
166k10171400
166k10171400
2
$begingroup$
And those powers of $theta$ are distinct elements of the field.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
56 mins ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
And those powers of $theta$ are distinct elements of the field.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
56 mins ago
2
2
$begingroup$
And those powers of $theta$ are distinct elements of the field.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
56 mins ago
$begingroup$
And those powers of $theta$ are distinct elements of the field.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
56 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147449%2fextension-of-splitting-fields-over-an-arbitrary-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Letting $alpha$ be any root, then $f$ splits as $(x-alpha)(x+alpha)(x-alpha^3)(x+alpha^3)$ in $F[alpha]$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
1 hour ago