Why is 'ping' unable to resolve a name when 'nslookup' works fine?DNS resolution Issue nslookup works, but...

What does 'script /dev/null' do?

What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?

Need help identifying/translating a plaque in Tangier, Morocco

Can I find out the caloric content of bread by dehydrating it?

How to manage monthly salary

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?

Can a planet have a different gravitational pull depending on its location in orbit around its sun?

Why was the "bread communication" in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?

Typesetting a double Over Dot on top of a symbol

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

If a centaur druid Wild Shapes into a Giant Elk, do their Charge features stack?

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?

Patience, young "Padovan"

LWC and complex parameters

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

What causes the sudden spool-up sound from an F-16 when enabling afterburner?

Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

Are white and non-white police officers equally likely to kill black suspects?

Information to fellow intern about hiring?

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

Lied on resume at previous job

What do the Banks children have against barley water?



Why is 'ping' unable to resolve a name when 'nslookup' works fine?


DNS resolution Issue nslookup works, but web/ping doesn'tDNS issue on windowsWindows 7 DNS not working (nslookup IS working; ping -4 name.com NOT working)Windows 10 DNS issuesWindows Xp DNS Resolution not workingWhy cannot I ping computer name without dot?Cannot resolve websites intermittently (mostly .gov)nslookup on XP resolves to address, but ping can't find hostWhy do I need to add a period after hostname in order to get DNS resolution to work?Windows 8/10 DNS issues browser - ping - nslookupMacBook can't use internet, but nslookup and ping both workDNS resolution Issue nslookup works, but web/ping doesn'tnslookup returns the right IP, ping still goes to the wrong ipPing fails to find host but NSLookup resolves okay on WindowsCannot connect to my win 7 machinewhat does it mean if nslookup and ping fail to resolve a host name but tracert does not?NetBIOS Name resolution fails when behind another routerNslookup works but ping failsWhy do I need to add a period after hostname in order to get DNS resolution to work?When i ping mydomain.com i reply from www.domain.com






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







129















On my Windows XP workstation, I can find the machine I want to connect to in DNS with nslookup:



nslookup wolfman
Server: dns.company.com
Address: 192.168.1.38

Name: wolfman.company.com
Address: 192.168.1.178


But, when I try to connect to that machine, I get an error telling me that the machine can't be found (i.e., can't be looked up in DNS):



C:> ping wolfman
Ping request could not find host wolfman. Please check the name and try again.


I am able to connect if I use the IP address directly:



C:> ping 192.168.1.178

Pinging 192.168.1.178 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 192.168.1.178: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
Reply from 192.168.1.178: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
Reply from 192.168.1.178: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=126
Reply from 192.168.1.178: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=126


I could work around this by adding an entry to my hosts file, but I would rather find out why this is happening. The problem is transient, most of the day I can connect to the machine just fine.



How is this possible?



ETA: I left this out for brevity, but it was asked for:



C:> ping wolfman.company.com
Ping request could not find host wolfman.company.com. Please check the name and try again.


ETA: Other applications get the same results. I only tried ping to simplify. telnet can't connect, Cygwin apps print a "unknown host wolfman" message.



Update: Using wireshark, I found that my workstation is not attempting a DNS lookup. It's just reporting the "could not find host" error message.










share|improve this question

























  • You could add a default DNS suffix for .company.com.

    – billc.cn
    Oct 29 '12 at 20:25











  • @billc.cn I already have that DNS suffix.

    – skiphoppy
    Oct 30 '12 at 16:35











  • What I think's happening is that ping isn't looking up the FQDN of the host, unlike nslookup which uses the search domain parameter of a DHCP offer (or whatever you specify for a static IP configuration). Confirm this by doing what @SLaks has said and pinging the FQDN of the host :)

    – jackweirdy
    Nov 19 '12 at 17:57






  • 1





    Possible duplicate of: superuser.com/questions/220471/…

    – Der Hochstapler
    Nov 19 '12 at 17:57











  • What happens when you run ping -4 wolfman?

    – Der Hochstapler
    Nov 19 '12 at 18:00


















129















On my Windows XP workstation, I can find the machine I want to connect to in DNS with nslookup:



nslookup wolfman
Server: dns.company.com
Address: 192.168.1.38

Name: wolfman.company.com
Address: 192.168.1.178


But, when I try to connect to that machine, I get an error telling me that the machine can't be found (i.e., can't be looked up in DNS):



C:> ping wolfman
Ping request could not find host wolfman. Please check the name and try again.


I am able to connect if I use the IP address directly:



C:> ping 192.168.1.178

Pinging 192.168.1.178 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 192.168.1.178: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
Reply from 192.168.1.178: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
Reply from 192.168.1.178: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=126
Reply from 192.168.1.178: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=126


I could work around this by adding an entry to my hosts file, but I would rather find out why this is happening. The problem is transient, most of the day I can connect to the machine just fine.



How is this possible?



ETA: I left this out for brevity, but it was asked for:



C:> ping wolfman.company.com
Ping request could not find host wolfman.company.com. Please check the name and try again.


ETA: Other applications get the same results. I only tried ping to simplify. telnet can't connect, Cygwin apps print a "unknown host wolfman" message.



Update: Using wireshark, I found that my workstation is not attempting a DNS lookup. It's just reporting the "could not find host" error message.










share|improve this question

























  • You could add a default DNS suffix for .company.com.

    – billc.cn
    Oct 29 '12 at 20:25











  • @billc.cn I already have that DNS suffix.

    – skiphoppy
    Oct 30 '12 at 16:35











  • What I think's happening is that ping isn't looking up the FQDN of the host, unlike nslookup which uses the search domain parameter of a DHCP offer (or whatever you specify for a static IP configuration). Confirm this by doing what @SLaks has said and pinging the FQDN of the host :)

    – jackweirdy
    Nov 19 '12 at 17:57






  • 1





    Possible duplicate of: superuser.com/questions/220471/…

    – Der Hochstapler
    Nov 19 '12 at 17:57











  • What happens when you run ping -4 wolfman?

    – Der Hochstapler
    Nov 19 '12 at 18:00














129












129








129


59






On my Windows XP workstation, I can find the machine I want to connect to in DNS with nslookup:



nslookup wolfman
Server: dns.company.com
Address: 192.168.1.38

Name: wolfman.company.com
Address: 192.168.1.178


But, when I try to connect to that machine, I get an error telling me that the machine can't be found (i.e., can't be looked up in DNS):



C:> ping wolfman
Ping request could not find host wolfman. Please check the name and try again.


I am able to connect if I use the IP address directly:



C:> ping 192.168.1.178

Pinging 192.168.1.178 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 192.168.1.178: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
Reply from 192.168.1.178: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
Reply from 192.168.1.178: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=126
Reply from 192.168.1.178: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=126


I could work around this by adding an entry to my hosts file, but I would rather find out why this is happening. The problem is transient, most of the day I can connect to the machine just fine.



How is this possible?



ETA: I left this out for brevity, but it was asked for:



C:> ping wolfman.company.com
Ping request could not find host wolfman.company.com. Please check the name and try again.


ETA: Other applications get the same results. I only tried ping to simplify. telnet can't connect, Cygwin apps print a "unknown host wolfman" message.



Update: Using wireshark, I found that my workstation is not attempting a DNS lookup. It's just reporting the "could not find host" error message.










share|improve this question
















On my Windows XP workstation, I can find the machine I want to connect to in DNS with nslookup:



nslookup wolfman
Server: dns.company.com
Address: 192.168.1.38

Name: wolfman.company.com
Address: 192.168.1.178


But, when I try to connect to that machine, I get an error telling me that the machine can't be found (i.e., can't be looked up in DNS):



C:> ping wolfman
Ping request could not find host wolfman. Please check the name and try again.


I am able to connect if I use the IP address directly:



C:> ping 192.168.1.178

Pinging 192.168.1.178 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 192.168.1.178: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
Reply from 192.168.1.178: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
Reply from 192.168.1.178: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=126
Reply from 192.168.1.178: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=126


I could work around this by adding an entry to my hosts file, but I would rather find out why this is happening. The problem is transient, most of the day I can connect to the machine just fine.



How is this possible?



ETA: I left this out for brevity, but it was asked for:



C:> ping wolfman.company.com
Ping request could not find host wolfman.company.com. Please check the name and try again.


ETA: Other applications get the same results. I only tried ping to simplify. telnet can't connect, Cygwin apps print a "unknown host wolfman" message.



Update: Using wireshark, I found that my workstation is not attempting a DNS lookup. It's just reporting the "could not find host" error message.







windows networking dns






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 19 '12 at 19:22







skiphoppy

















asked Oct 29 '12 at 19:11









skiphoppyskiphoppy

97841121




97841121













  • You could add a default DNS suffix for .company.com.

    – billc.cn
    Oct 29 '12 at 20:25











  • @billc.cn I already have that DNS suffix.

    – skiphoppy
    Oct 30 '12 at 16:35











  • What I think's happening is that ping isn't looking up the FQDN of the host, unlike nslookup which uses the search domain parameter of a DHCP offer (or whatever you specify for a static IP configuration). Confirm this by doing what @SLaks has said and pinging the FQDN of the host :)

    – jackweirdy
    Nov 19 '12 at 17:57






  • 1





    Possible duplicate of: superuser.com/questions/220471/…

    – Der Hochstapler
    Nov 19 '12 at 17:57











  • What happens when you run ping -4 wolfman?

    – Der Hochstapler
    Nov 19 '12 at 18:00



















  • You could add a default DNS suffix for .company.com.

    – billc.cn
    Oct 29 '12 at 20:25











  • @billc.cn I already have that DNS suffix.

    – skiphoppy
    Oct 30 '12 at 16:35











  • What I think's happening is that ping isn't looking up the FQDN of the host, unlike nslookup which uses the search domain parameter of a DHCP offer (or whatever you specify for a static IP configuration). Confirm this by doing what @SLaks has said and pinging the FQDN of the host :)

    – jackweirdy
    Nov 19 '12 at 17:57






  • 1





    Possible duplicate of: superuser.com/questions/220471/…

    – Der Hochstapler
    Nov 19 '12 at 17:57











  • What happens when you run ping -4 wolfman?

    – Der Hochstapler
    Nov 19 '12 at 18:00

















You could add a default DNS suffix for .company.com.

– billc.cn
Oct 29 '12 at 20:25





You could add a default DNS suffix for .company.com.

– billc.cn
Oct 29 '12 at 20:25













@billc.cn I already have that DNS suffix.

– skiphoppy
Oct 30 '12 at 16:35





@billc.cn I already have that DNS suffix.

– skiphoppy
Oct 30 '12 at 16:35













What I think's happening is that ping isn't looking up the FQDN of the host, unlike nslookup which uses the search domain parameter of a DHCP offer (or whatever you specify for a static IP configuration). Confirm this by doing what @SLaks has said and pinging the FQDN of the host :)

– jackweirdy
Nov 19 '12 at 17:57





What I think's happening is that ping isn't looking up the FQDN of the host, unlike nslookup which uses the search domain parameter of a DHCP offer (or whatever you specify for a static IP configuration). Confirm this by doing what @SLaks has said and pinging the FQDN of the host :)

– jackweirdy
Nov 19 '12 at 17:57




1




1





Possible duplicate of: superuser.com/questions/220471/…

– Der Hochstapler
Nov 19 '12 at 17:57





Possible duplicate of: superuser.com/questions/220471/…

– Der Hochstapler
Nov 19 '12 at 17:57













What happens when you run ping -4 wolfman?

– Der Hochstapler
Nov 19 '12 at 18:00





What happens when you run ping -4 wolfman?

– Der Hochstapler
Nov 19 '12 at 18:00










21 Answers
21






active

oldest

votes


















97





+200









I believe that nslookup opens a winsock connection on the DNS port and issues a query, whereas ping uses the DNS Client service. You could try and stop this service and see whether this makes a difference.



Some commands that will reinitialize various network states :



Reset WINSOCK entries to installation defaults : netsh winsock reset catalog

Reset TCP/IP stack to installation defaults : netsh int ip reset reset.log

Flush DNS resolver cache : ipconfig /flushdns

Renew DNS client registration and refresh DHCP leases : ipconfig /registerdns

Flush routing table : route /f (reboot required)






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    I would bet Active Directory is probably active, but I do not know how to test.

    – skiphoppy
    Nov 20 '12 at 14:51






  • 11





    I disabled the DNS Client service, and the problem appeared to go away! Not sure yet if it was a fluke. The problem didn't come back when I restarted the service.

    – skiphoppy
    Nov 20 '12 at 14:55






  • 5





    Sometimes just stopping and restarting the service fixes DNS problems (don't ask me why). The question is how long this will last. Some unlucky people need to repeat it again and again.

    – harrymc
    Nov 20 '12 at 16:06






  • 1





    sfc /scannow in case the dns client service system files are corrupt subtly? I've also seen some people with similar problems caused by a virus.

    – Jon Kloske
    Nov 26 '12 at 5:27






  • 1





    What was missing for me in this answer was ipconfig /registerdns (I've elaborated in my answer below)

    – Mick Halsband
    Jun 4 '15 at 8:28





















27














Try ping with hostname followed by a dot. So instead of ping wolfman use ping wolfman.



That should get you resolving without having to do workarounds with hosts file, etc.






share|improve this answer
























  • wow, this worked for me as well. My guess is that something expects a domain name which is not configured

    – user1190
    Aug 10 '16 at 20:46











  • OK, this works ... why?

    – Daniel B.
    Sep 8 '16 at 2:00






  • 1





    any suggestions why this is working and how to rather use locally names without trailing dots?

    – Ruberoid
    Mar 6 '17 at 20:01











  • Thanks - this worked for me but would also know why this would be working

    – Frank Fu
    May 1 '17 at 0:09






  • 2





    @Ruberoid Please see my answer for how to do this automatically.

    – Frederik Aalund
    Oct 9 '17 at 11:54



















16














Try ipconfig /displaydns and look for wolfman. If it's cached as "name does not exist" (possibly because of a previous intermittent failed lookup), you can flush the cache with ipconfig /flushdns.



nslookup doesn't use the cache, but rather queries the DNS server directly.






share|improve this answer
























  • I tried: it's not cached. And clearing the cache doesn't fix the issue, either.

    – skiphoppy
    Nov 20 '12 at 14:46











  • Can you post the output of nslookup -all? Is novc listed?

    – craig65535
    Nov 20 '12 at 18:22



















12














Try adding . to the DNS suffixes for that connection. I.e, go to:




  1. Ethernet Status

  2. Click Properties

  3. Internet Protocol Version 4

  4. Click Properties

  5. Click Advanced

  6. Append these DNS suffices (in order)

  7. Add . as a suffix.


The same steps are illustrated in the following screenshot:





This should make ping wolfman work.



Explanation



nslookup wolfman (name server lookup: wolfman) sends the hostname (wolfman) to the DNS (domain name system) to obtain the corresponding IP address. This is the sole purpose of the nslookup command. This works already, so we have verified that the DNS works and that wolfman indeed corresponds to an IP address.



In contrast, ping wolfman needs to do two things:




  1. Get the IP that the hostname (wolfman) corresponds to.

  2. Send packets to the IP and listen for the response


On Windows (even recent versions such as Windows 10), the first step can easily fail. For the sake of backwards compatibility, Windows supports various methods of hostname resolution (hosts file, DNS, NetBIOS/WINS, LMHOST file).



Unfortunately, it seems that Windows' ping command doesn't always attempt a DNS lookup. I don't know the specific conditions that triggers this behaviour.



Fortunately, we can force Windows to do a DNS lookup by using a FQDN (fully qualified domain name). In practice, we do this by suffixing a . dot to the hostname: wolfman.. Try ping wolfman. and verify that it works.



The final step is to force Windows to append this dot itself. I've already shown how to do this in the beginning of this answer.






share|improve this answer
























  • Just want to say that this turned out to be the factor that succeeded on a machine I was working on. Stupid though it seems. And not just for ping, but for other applications too. I'm not sure your explanation of what's tried when is quite right (but you acknowledge you're uncertain on that). But a big plus for mentioning that this failure can be easily diagnosed by attempting ping with the domain name with a dot suffix manually added.

    – gwideman
    Jun 28 '18 at 9:55













  • This doesn't make sense. You're positing that, "Windows' ping command doesn't always attempt a DNS lookup," but then recommend changing how DNS lookups are performed to solve that? It seems more likely that ping is performing a DNS lookup(s) but is doing them incorrectly, and that's why this fix works.

    – Twisty Impersonator
    Jan 14 at 13:57











  • @TwistyImpersonator I understand your confusion. The point is that Windows will attempt several methods of hostname resolution if given wolfman and a DNS lookup is (apparently) not a top priority among said methods. Now, if you use wolfman. instead, Windows will prioritize a DNS lookup over the other methods because wolfman. is a FQDN that (obviously) requires a DNS lookup.

    – Frederik Aalund
    Jan 14 at 14:24













  • So I think you're saying if ping got to the point of doing a DNS lookup in the course of its normal lookup workflow, it would work. However, ping should end up trying DNS if the other lookup methods don't return an answer, implying the reason ping fails on its own is because another method it's trying before DNS is returning an answer. That explanation doesn't fit the fact of ping not being able to find the host though.

    – Twisty Impersonator
    Jan 14 at 16:58











  • @TwistyImpersonator "So I think you're saying if ping got to the point of doing a DNS lookup in the course of its normal lookup workflow, it would work": Yes. "However, ping should end up trying DNS if the other lookup methods don't return an answer, implying the reason ping fails on its own is because another method it's trying before DNS is returning an answer": Apparently not. Maybe ping just gives up after trying a couple of methods. Maybe ping gives up after a timeout. Maybe ping never tries a DNS lookup because it thinks the hostname is not DNS-like.

    – Frederik Aalund
    Jan 14 at 19:41



















10














nslookup works different to other commands when resolving names/ip addresses on Windows.



The normal resolution method on Windows is as follows:




  1. The client checks to see if the name queried is its own.

  2. The client then searches a local Hosts file, a list of IP address and names stored on the local computer.

  3. Domain Name System (DNS) servers are queried.

  4. If the name is still not resolved, NetBIOS name resolution sequence is used as a backup. This order can be changed by configuring the NetBIOS node type of the client.


nslookup on the other hand is used for testing Domain Name Servers.






share|improve this answer



















  • 3





    Are there any settings that can move the NetBIOS query higher up in that list? I have the gut feeling that the NetBIOS lookup is involved somehow, but since the DNS query is definitely working I can't see how it would ever get to that step, if the sequence above is immutable.

    – skiphoppy
    Nov 20 '12 at 14:49



















8














I've struggled with a similar issue and have tried the solution suggested by @harrymc.
I found what eventually seems to (at least somewhat) work at the microsoft technet forum
(nslookup works but nothing else has DNS on standalone Win7 PC)



Here's the quote:




... try to use the command below to flush and reset a client resolver cache for test.



ipconfig /flushdns



ipconfig /registerdns



Please refer to the link below for more details.
http://jefferyland.wordpress.com/2011/07/28/quick-review-of-flushdns-registerdns-and-dns-queries/




So basically what was missing for me was ipconfig /registerdns






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    original answer by @harrymc now reflects the missing /registerdns command

    – Mick Halsband
    Jun 29 '15 at 10:35











  • I've been playing whack-a-mole with this issue on Win10 for about a year. When my laptop wakes up it can't find any corp servers, but external sites like microsoft.com do work. It seems to happen when changing WiFi networks (home/VPN vs office). flushdns solves the issue sometimes but not always. Today I tried the registerdns and that immediately corrected the problem. Tomorrow I'll try adding . to the end of a name (but ping already fails with FQDN for internal servers). It's very frustrating. And to top it off - if I wait a while the problem will resolve itself.

    – ripvlan
    Aug 14 '18 at 13:51



















6














Just today we had the same issue, but the solution was different. So I thought, I'd add it for reference as this was the top most search result.





  • Problem: ping will not resolve a host name, but nslookup can. (Observed on 2 different Windows Server 2012 R2 hosts.)


  • Cause: (For each host) The host has more than one NIC connected and there are multiple default gateways configured.


  • Solution: (For each host) Remove default gateway from configuration of all NICs but one, so there reamains only one default gateway.






share|improve this answer
























  • ah this did it for me. Perfect.

    – IAmTheSquidward
    Jan 26 '16 at 0:39











  • Short and simple

    – Frank Fu
    Mar 12 '18 at 11:37



















5














Maybe wolfman.company.com is listed in C:Windowssystem32driversetchosts ?



nslookup bypasses that file and always asks DNS, while ping and other tools first of all look up in "hosts" file, then in DNS.






share|improve this answer
























  • Good thought! But I checked, and neither of the machines I've seen this issue with are listed in hosts.

    – skiphoppy
    Nov 20 '12 at 14:47



















5














I had the same problem on a Windows 2012R2 (=8.1) system, and tried all the above suggestions, but none of them would fix it:

- Pinging the fully qualified name worked.

- Pinging the unqualified name did not.

- Both worked on several other systems, that had the same OS and apparently the same configuration.

- All the necessary suffix search strings were there.

(Note that some of the proposed fixes, like the workaround for the multi-label queries, are obviously irrelevant, as the unqualified name has only one part.)



Then I noticed that the target system I was trying to ping did NOT have an IPv6 address. So I tried "ping -4 unqualified_name", and bingo! this worked.

So for some reason, on this system only, ping only tried to resolve unqualified name->IPv6 address, and not unqualified name->IPv4.

For me the fix was to disable IPv6 completely as I don't need it at all. But I'd be really interested to find a more gentle way to tell ping (or presumably the DNS client service) to try resolving both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.






share|improve this answer































    2














    Adding an entry in the file c:/windows/system32/drivers/etc/hosts might fix it.






    share|improve this answer


























    • That will fix it, but it will not resolve his issue on that machine, but it will not help him on other machines. Remember Hosts > DNS Resolver > DNS Server > NetBIOS name.

      – The Dude
      May 29 '15 at 15:10



















    2














    I was trying to figure out why on one win 7 computer I can use ping server which works, and the other it can't resolve server. However both could ping server.lan which I didn't quite understand.



    Turns out I had messed with some settings (DNS suffixes) to not have to use FQDNs while using the work VPN. I had to go add my local .lan to those suffixes in order to get both computers acting the same.



    Go to Control Panel > Network and Internet > Network Connections and right click on your network connection and hit Properties. Click Internet Protocol Version 4 and hit the Properties button. Then the Advanced... button in this new window. Go to the DNS tab, this is where I had added a DNS suffix for my work but also needed one for my normal home connections.



    Advanced TCP/IP Settings






    share|improve this answer
























    • I ran into a similar situation on a server with a static IP address. The first entry in the "Append these DNS suffixes" was blank AND the "DNS suffix for this connection" was blank. Other servers where it worked had the same blank "Append these DNS suffixes" BUT the "DNS suffix for this connection" populated.

      – Tim Lewis
      Apr 7 '16 at 17:29



















    2














    I came across this issue as well. The "easiest" way to fix it for me was to simply add a . to the end of the hostname. However this is rather annoying. Most networks don't require this. I'd rather not have to tell everyone else on the network to do this when they need to access the same resource.



    I was looking at the suggestion from Frederik Aalund as a possible solution and noticed that they suggested switching from the default "Append primary and connection specific DNS suffixes" option. This made me think maybe my network was simply slightly missconfigured.



    Looking at my DD-WRT settings, the "LAN Domain" was left unset. Setting that to an arbitrary string seems to have fixed this issue for all clients on my network without having special configuration on each machine, the solution I wanted! :)






    share|improve this answer































      1














      i have encountered this when we migrated to windows 7 from windows XP, the issue was related to a Windows 7 Multi Label DNS Query issue.



      Allow DNS Suffix Appending to Unqualified Multi-Label Name Queries - see:



      http://computerstepbystep.com/allow_dns_suffix_appending_to_unqualified_multi_label_name_queries.html



      Hope this helps






      share|improve this answer





















      • 2





        Welcome to Super User! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

        – Canadian Luke
        Mar 21 '14 at 17:40





















      1














      If on mac os x it might be an DNS Cache problem:



      Dump the cache



      sudo killall -HUP mDNSResponder
      sudo dscacheutil -flushcache





      share|improve this answer
























      • OP asks about Windows XP and question is tagged Windows.

        – P-L
        Oct 20 '17 at 15:38











      • Maybe it is helpful to others. I will leave it, the answer was here now for more than 3 years. Why delete now?

        – Christian
        Oct 24 '17 at 11:12



















      1














      I'm picking this up because it bothered me the last year and maybe I found a workaround.



      For me it seemed some dns-caching-system within the windows client is faulty. Windows 7 and 8.1 are affected by this... cannot say much about Windows XP anymore. ping doesn't resolve the name. it's not the icmp-part which is important but the name resolving part). nslookup is designed to query the nameserver and does exactly that and no windows name-hierarchy-resolving.



      Restarting the dnscache service helped everytime. But since I disabled IPv6 on all client-interfaces the problem didn't occured anymore.



      Cheers!






      share|improve this answer
























      • Disabling IPv6 may not be a viable solution for everybody (and it sounds anecdotal at best, anyway). Everything else you say seems to have been said already in this thread (e.g., harrymc’s comment “Sometimes just stopping and restarting the service fixes DNS problems”, two years ago).

        – G-Man
        Nov 3 '14 at 15:31



















      1














      I might be wrong on this because its based on my long-forgotten NT4 ressource-kit days.



      As fare I can recall PING uses Netbios/WINS and DNS (in that order, at least if you don't specify a FQDN).



      WINS is gone many year ago but you might still have Netbios enabled on your interface and PING therefore might use netbios that might not give you any result. Especially if traffic is passing a router somewhere.



      Just disable Netbios and Ping will use DNS as first priority and append the registered DNS Surffic on the interface to your hostname.






      share|improve this answer































        0














        I have just had this problem, and found something quite peculiar, and managed to fix it Lol



        Basically, if you have any entries in your hosts file, that are the same as the IP your ping is trying to resolve to, it will fail.



        For example, if in your DNS, you have a record for www.example.com - 10.0.0.20, but then you have an entry in your client's hosts file, 10.0.0.20 somethingelse.com, you will not be able to ping www.example.com



        Strange huh






        share|improve this answer































          0














          In my case what solved this problem was to add the domain of the host I was trying to ping to a group policy option named "DNS Suffix Search List".



          The procedure in short is this: Open gpedit.msc and navigate to Computer Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> Network -> DNS Client > DNS Suffix Search List, set it to "Enabled" and add the domain name to the list (the list is empty by default).



          A more detailed description of these steps can be found here






          share|improve this answer































            0














            I had the same problem and turns out another machine had the same IP address, and that was causing it.



            Changed IP back to DHCP and everything was working fine.






            share|improve this answer


























            • nslookup worked because it doesn't need to communicate with the other host. ping does need to communicate and obviously breaks.

              – ndemou
              Feb 13 at 17:02











            • @ndemou: That explanation doesn't make any sense.  Yes, it is ping's job to try to communicate with the other host, but the first step in that process is to get the other host's IP address.  If it gets the other host's IP address, it tells you so; if it then cannot communicate with the other host, it ultimately reports "100% loss".  But, in the question, ping is failing even to get an address.  (Try ping bbbbbbb.com and ping bbbbbb.com for comparison.)

              – Scott
              Feb 13 at 17:57











            • You are right @Scott. I was editing Klaus' answer and while reading his description of the problem I forgot that this questions particular problem with ping is that it doesn't resolve. Can't be sure but I would bet now that Klaus was just not getting replies.

              – ndemou
              Feb 14 at 7:37



















            0














            None of the solutions here worked for me. What did work for me was reconnecting to my work's vpn using OpenVPN. Then after disconnecting everything continued to work.



            I believe the issue was related to the power going out while my computer was connected with openVPN. The only way I figured this out was by using WireShark. I noticed that the destination IPs for all the queries were going to IPs on my work's internal network.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Bela is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.




























              -1














              ping uses the ICMP protocol, specifically the 'Echo Request' and 'Echo Reply'.



              many networks disable ICMP utilities in order to prevent attacks or basic network scanning. I've found many routers you purchase come with a setting to disable ping and like utilities enabled by default.



              you can find more about ICMP here:



              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Control_Message_Protocol






              share|improve this answer



















              • 8





                Yes, but before using ICMP, the domain has to be resolved to an IP address as usual. So this is not the issue here.

                – Michael
                Nov 23 '12 at 2:25












              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "3"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: false,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f495759%2fwhy-is-ping-unable-to-resolve-a-name-when-nslookup-works-fine%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown




















              StackExchange.ready(function () {
              $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
              var showEditor = function() {
              $("#show-editor-button").hide();
              $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
              StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
              };

              var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
              if(useFancy == 'True') {
              var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
              var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
              var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

              $(this).loadPopup({
              url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
              loaded: function(popup) {
              var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
              var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
              var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

              pTitle.text(popupTitle);
              pBody.html(popupBody);
              pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
              }
              })
              } else{
              var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
              if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
              showEditor();
              }
              }
              });
              });






              21 Answers
              21






              active

              oldest

              votes








              21 Answers
              21






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              97





              +200









              I believe that nslookup opens a winsock connection on the DNS port and issues a query, whereas ping uses the DNS Client service. You could try and stop this service and see whether this makes a difference.



              Some commands that will reinitialize various network states :



              Reset WINSOCK entries to installation defaults : netsh winsock reset catalog

              Reset TCP/IP stack to installation defaults : netsh int ip reset reset.log

              Flush DNS resolver cache : ipconfig /flushdns

              Renew DNS client registration and refresh DHCP leases : ipconfig /registerdns

              Flush routing table : route /f (reboot required)






              share|improve this answer





















              • 1





                I would bet Active Directory is probably active, but I do not know how to test.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:51






              • 11





                I disabled the DNS Client service, and the problem appeared to go away! Not sure yet if it was a fluke. The problem didn't come back when I restarted the service.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:55






              • 5





                Sometimes just stopping and restarting the service fixes DNS problems (don't ask me why). The question is how long this will last. Some unlucky people need to repeat it again and again.

                – harrymc
                Nov 20 '12 at 16:06






              • 1





                sfc /scannow in case the dns client service system files are corrupt subtly? I've also seen some people with similar problems caused by a virus.

                – Jon Kloske
                Nov 26 '12 at 5:27






              • 1





                What was missing for me in this answer was ipconfig /registerdns (I've elaborated in my answer below)

                – Mick Halsband
                Jun 4 '15 at 8:28


















              97





              +200









              I believe that nslookup opens a winsock connection on the DNS port and issues a query, whereas ping uses the DNS Client service. You could try and stop this service and see whether this makes a difference.



              Some commands that will reinitialize various network states :



              Reset WINSOCK entries to installation defaults : netsh winsock reset catalog

              Reset TCP/IP stack to installation defaults : netsh int ip reset reset.log

              Flush DNS resolver cache : ipconfig /flushdns

              Renew DNS client registration and refresh DHCP leases : ipconfig /registerdns

              Flush routing table : route /f (reboot required)






              share|improve this answer





















              • 1





                I would bet Active Directory is probably active, but I do not know how to test.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:51






              • 11





                I disabled the DNS Client service, and the problem appeared to go away! Not sure yet if it was a fluke. The problem didn't come back when I restarted the service.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:55






              • 5





                Sometimes just stopping and restarting the service fixes DNS problems (don't ask me why). The question is how long this will last. Some unlucky people need to repeat it again and again.

                – harrymc
                Nov 20 '12 at 16:06






              • 1





                sfc /scannow in case the dns client service system files are corrupt subtly? I've also seen some people with similar problems caused by a virus.

                – Jon Kloske
                Nov 26 '12 at 5:27






              • 1





                What was missing for me in this answer was ipconfig /registerdns (I've elaborated in my answer below)

                – Mick Halsband
                Jun 4 '15 at 8:28
















              97





              +200







              97





              +200



              97




              +200





              I believe that nslookup opens a winsock connection on the DNS port and issues a query, whereas ping uses the DNS Client service. You could try and stop this service and see whether this makes a difference.



              Some commands that will reinitialize various network states :



              Reset WINSOCK entries to installation defaults : netsh winsock reset catalog

              Reset TCP/IP stack to installation defaults : netsh int ip reset reset.log

              Flush DNS resolver cache : ipconfig /flushdns

              Renew DNS client registration and refresh DHCP leases : ipconfig /registerdns

              Flush routing table : route /f (reboot required)






              share|improve this answer















              I believe that nslookup opens a winsock connection on the DNS port and issues a query, whereas ping uses the DNS Client service. You could try and stop this service and see whether this makes a difference.



              Some commands that will reinitialize various network states :



              Reset WINSOCK entries to installation defaults : netsh winsock reset catalog

              Reset TCP/IP stack to installation defaults : netsh int ip reset reset.log

              Flush DNS resolver cache : ipconfig /flushdns

              Renew DNS client registration and refresh DHCP leases : ipconfig /registerdns

              Flush routing table : route /f (reboot required)







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Jun 4 '15 at 8:33

























              answered Nov 20 '12 at 8:40









              harrymcharrymc

              264k14273582




              264k14273582








              • 1





                I would bet Active Directory is probably active, but I do not know how to test.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:51






              • 11





                I disabled the DNS Client service, and the problem appeared to go away! Not sure yet if it was a fluke. The problem didn't come back when I restarted the service.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:55






              • 5





                Sometimes just stopping and restarting the service fixes DNS problems (don't ask me why). The question is how long this will last. Some unlucky people need to repeat it again and again.

                – harrymc
                Nov 20 '12 at 16:06






              • 1





                sfc /scannow in case the dns client service system files are corrupt subtly? I've also seen some people with similar problems caused by a virus.

                – Jon Kloske
                Nov 26 '12 at 5:27






              • 1





                What was missing for me in this answer was ipconfig /registerdns (I've elaborated in my answer below)

                – Mick Halsband
                Jun 4 '15 at 8:28
















              • 1





                I would bet Active Directory is probably active, but I do not know how to test.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:51






              • 11





                I disabled the DNS Client service, and the problem appeared to go away! Not sure yet if it was a fluke. The problem didn't come back when I restarted the service.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:55






              • 5





                Sometimes just stopping and restarting the service fixes DNS problems (don't ask me why). The question is how long this will last. Some unlucky people need to repeat it again and again.

                – harrymc
                Nov 20 '12 at 16:06






              • 1





                sfc /scannow in case the dns client service system files are corrupt subtly? I've also seen some people with similar problems caused by a virus.

                – Jon Kloske
                Nov 26 '12 at 5:27






              • 1





                What was missing for me in this answer was ipconfig /registerdns (I've elaborated in my answer below)

                – Mick Halsband
                Jun 4 '15 at 8:28










              1




              1





              I would bet Active Directory is probably active, but I do not know how to test.

              – skiphoppy
              Nov 20 '12 at 14:51





              I would bet Active Directory is probably active, but I do not know how to test.

              – skiphoppy
              Nov 20 '12 at 14:51




              11




              11





              I disabled the DNS Client service, and the problem appeared to go away! Not sure yet if it was a fluke. The problem didn't come back when I restarted the service.

              – skiphoppy
              Nov 20 '12 at 14:55





              I disabled the DNS Client service, and the problem appeared to go away! Not sure yet if it was a fluke. The problem didn't come back when I restarted the service.

              – skiphoppy
              Nov 20 '12 at 14:55




              5




              5





              Sometimes just stopping and restarting the service fixes DNS problems (don't ask me why). The question is how long this will last. Some unlucky people need to repeat it again and again.

              – harrymc
              Nov 20 '12 at 16:06





              Sometimes just stopping and restarting the service fixes DNS problems (don't ask me why). The question is how long this will last. Some unlucky people need to repeat it again and again.

              – harrymc
              Nov 20 '12 at 16:06




              1




              1





              sfc /scannow in case the dns client service system files are corrupt subtly? I've also seen some people with similar problems caused by a virus.

              – Jon Kloske
              Nov 26 '12 at 5:27





              sfc /scannow in case the dns client service system files are corrupt subtly? I've also seen some people with similar problems caused by a virus.

              – Jon Kloske
              Nov 26 '12 at 5:27




              1




              1





              What was missing for me in this answer was ipconfig /registerdns (I've elaborated in my answer below)

              – Mick Halsband
              Jun 4 '15 at 8:28







              What was missing for me in this answer was ipconfig /registerdns (I've elaborated in my answer below)

              – Mick Halsband
              Jun 4 '15 at 8:28















              27














              Try ping with hostname followed by a dot. So instead of ping wolfman use ping wolfman.



              That should get you resolving without having to do workarounds with hosts file, etc.






              share|improve this answer
























              • wow, this worked for me as well. My guess is that something expects a domain name which is not configured

                – user1190
                Aug 10 '16 at 20:46











              • OK, this works ... why?

                – Daniel B.
                Sep 8 '16 at 2:00






              • 1





                any suggestions why this is working and how to rather use locally names without trailing dots?

                – Ruberoid
                Mar 6 '17 at 20:01











              • Thanks - this worked for me but would also know why this would be working

                – Frank Fu
                May 1 '17 at 0:09






              • 2





                @Ruberoid Please see my answer for how to do this automatically.

                – Frederik Aalund
                Oct 9 '17 at 11:54
















              27














              Try ping with hostname followed by a dot. So instead of ping wolfman use ping wolfman.



              That should get you resolving without having to do workarounds with hosts file, etc.






              share|improve this answer
























              • wow, this worked for me as well. My guess is that something expects a domain name which is not configured

                – user1190
                Aug 10 '16 at 20:46











              • OK, this works ... why?

                – Daniel B.
                Sep 8 '16 at 2:00






              • 1





                any suggestions why this is working and how to rather use locally names without trailing dots?

                – Ruberoid
                Mar 6 '17 at 20:01











              • Thanks - this worked for me but would also know why this would be working

                – Frank Fu
                May 1 '17 at 0:09






              • 2





                @Ruberoid Please see my answer for how to do this automatically.

                – Frederik Aalund
                Oct 9 '17 at 11:54














              27












              27








              27







              Try ping with hostname followed by a dot. So instead of ping wolfman use ping wolfman.



              That should get you resolving without having to do workarounds with hosts file, etc.






              share|improve this answer













              Try ping with hostname followed by a dot. So instead of ping wolfman use ping wolfman.



              That should get you resolving without having to do workarounds with hosts file, etc.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered May 5 '14 at 1:08









              SenthilSenthil

              27132




              27132













              • wow, this worked for me as well. My guess is that something expects a domain name which is not configured

                – user1190
                Aug 10 '16 at 20:46











              • OK, this works ... why?

                – Daniel B.
                Sep 8 '16 at 2:00






              • 1





                any suggestions why this is working and how to rather use locally names without trailing dots?

                – Ruberoid
                Mar 6 '17 at 20:01











              • Thanks - this worked for me but would also know why this would be working

                – Frank Fu
                May 1 '17 at 0:09






              • 2





                @Ruberoid Please see my answer for how to do this automatically.

                – Frederik Aalund
                Oct 9 '17 at 11:54



















              • wow, this worked for me as well. My guess is that something expects a domain name which is not configured

                – user1190
                Aug 10 '16 at 20:46











              • OK, this works ... why?

                – Daniel B.
                Sep 8 '16 at 2:00






              • 1





                any suggestions why this is working and how to rather use locally names without trailing dots?

                – Ruberoid
                Mar 6 '17 at 20:01











              • Thanks - this worked for me but would also know why this would be working

                – Frank Fu
                May 1 '17 at 0:09






              • 2





                @Ruberoid Please see my answer for how to do this automatically.

                – Frederik Aalund
                Oct 9 '17 at 11:54

















              wow, this worked for me as well. My guess is that something expects a domain name which is not configured

              – user1190
              Aug 10 '16 at 20:46





              wow, this worked for me as well. My guess is that something expects a domain name which is not configured

              – user1190
              Aug 10 '16 at 20:46













              OK, this works ... why?

              – Daniel B.
              Sep 8 '16 at 2:00





              OK, this works ... why?

              – Daniel B.
              Sep 8 '16 at 2:00




              1




              1





              any suggestions why this is working and how to rather use locally names without trailing dots?

              – Ruberoid
              Mar 6 '17 at 20:01





              any suggestions why this is working and how to rather use locally names without trailing dots?

              – Ruberoid
              Mar 6 '17 at 20:01













              Thanks - this worked for me but would also know why this would be working

              – Frank Fu
              May 1 '17 at 0:09





              Thanks - this worked for me but would also know why this would be working

              – Frank Fu
              May 1 '17 at 0:09




              2




              2





              @Ruberoid Please see my answer for how to do this automatically.

              – Frederik Aalund
              Oct 9 '17 at 11:54





              @Ruberoid Please see my answer for how to do this automatically.

              – Frederik Aalund
              Oct 9 '17 at 11:54











              16














              Try ipconfig /displaydns and look for wolfman. If it's cached as "name does not exist" (possibly because of a previous intermittent failed lookup), you can flush the cache with ipconfig /flushdns.



              nslookup doesn't use the cache, but rather queries the DNS server directly.






              share|improve this answer
























              • I tried: it's not cached. And clearing the cache doesn't fix the issue, either.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:46











              • Can you post the output of nslookup -all? Is novc listed?

                – craig65535
                Nov 20 '12 at 18:22
















              16














              Try ipconfig /displaydns and look for wolfman. If it's cached as "name does not exist" (possibly because of a previous intermittent failed lookup), you can flush the cache with ipconfig /flushdns.



              nslookup doesn't use the cache, but rather queries the DNS server directly.






              share|improve this answer
























              • I tried: it's not cached. And clearing the cache doesn't fix the issue, either.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:46











              • Can you post the output of nslookup -all? Is novc listed?

                – craig65535
                Nov 20 '12 at 18:22














              16












              16








              16







              Try ipconfig /displaydns and look for wolfman. If it's cached as "name does not exist" (possibly because of a previous intermittent failed lookup), you can flush the cache with ipconfig /flushdns.



              nslookup doesn't use the cache, but rather queries the DNS server directly.






              share|improve this answer













              Try ipconfig /displaydns and look for wolfman. If it's cached as "name does not exist" (possibly because of a previous intermittent failed lookup), you can flush the cache with ipconfig /flushdns.



              nslookup doesn't use the cache, but rather queries the DNS server directly.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Nov 19 '12 at 21:57









              craig65535craig65535

              265128




              265128













              • I tried: it's not cached. And clearing the cache doesn't fix the issue, either.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:46











              • Can you post the output of nslookup -all? Is novc listed?

                – craig65535
                Nov 20 '12 at 18:22



















              • I tried: it's not cached. And clearing the cache doesn't fix the issue, either.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:46











              • Can you post the output of nslookup -all? Is novc listed?

                – craig65535
                Nov 20 '12 at 18:22

















              I tried: it's not cached. And clearing the cache doesn't fix the issue, either.

              – skiphoppy
              Nov 20 '12 at 14:46





              I tried: it's not cached. And clearing the cache doesn't fix the issue, either.

              – skiphoppy
              Nov 20 '12 at 14:46













              Can you post the output of nslookup -all? Is novc listed?

              – craig65535
              Nov 20 '12 at 18:22





              Can you post the output of nslookup -all? Is novc listed?

              – craig65535
              Nov 20 '12 at 18:22











              12














              Try adding . to the DNS suffixes for that connection. I.e, go to:




              1. Ethernet Status

              2. Click Properties

              3. Internet Protocol Version 4

              4. Click Properties

              5. Click Advanced

              6. Append these DNS suffices (in order)

              7. Add . as a suffix.


              The same steps are illustrated in the following screenshot:





              This should make ping wolfman work.



              Explanation



              nslookup wolfman (name server lookup: wolfman) sends the hostname (wolfman) to the DNS (domain name system) to obtain the corresponding IP address. This is the sole purpose of the nslookup command. This works already, so we have verified that the DNS works and that wolfman indeed corresponds to an IP address.



              In contrast, ping wolfman needs to do two things:




              1. Get the IP that the hostname (wolfman) corresponds to.

              2. Send packets to the IP and listen for the response


              On Windows (even recent versions such as Windows 10), the first step can easily fail. For the sake of backwards compatibility, Windows supports various methods of hostname resolution (hosts file, DNS, NetBIOS/WINS, LMHOST file).



              Unfortunately, it seems that Windows' ping command doesn't always attempt a DNS lookup. I don't know the specific conditions that triggers this behaviour.



              Fortunately, we can force Windows to do a DNS lookup by using a FQDN (fully qualified domain name). In practice, we do this by suffixing a . dot to the hostname: wolfman.. Try ping wolfman. and verify that it works.



              The final step is to force Windows to append this dot itself. I've already shown how to do this in the beginning of this answer.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Just want to say that this turned out to be the factor that succeeded on a machine I was working on. Stupid though it seems. And not just for ping, but for other applications too. I'm not sure your explanation of what's tried when is quite right (but you acknowledge you're uncertain on that). But a big plus for mentioning that this failure can be easily diagnosed by attempting ping with the domain name with a dot suffix manually added.

                – gwideman
                Jun 28 '18 at 9:55













              • This doesn't make sense. You're positing that, "Windows' ping command doesn't always attempt a DNS lookup," but then recommend changing how DNS lookups are performed to solve that? It seems more likely that ping is performing a DNS lookup(s) but is doing them incorrectly, and that's why this fix works.

                – Twisty Impersonator
                Jan 14 at 13:57











              • @TwistyImpersonator I understand your confusion. The point is that Windows will attempt several methods of hostname resolution if given wolfman and a DNS lookup is (apparently) not a top priority among said methods. Now, if you use wolfman. instead, Windows will prioritize a DNS lookup over the other methods because wolfman. is a FQDN that (obviously) requires a DNS lookup.

                – Frederik Aalund
                Jan 14 at 14:24













              • So I think you're saying if ping got to the point of doing a DNS lookup in the course of its normal lookup workflow, it would work. However, ping should end up trying DNS if the other lookup methods don't return an answer, implying the reason ping fails on its own is because another method it's trying before DNS is returning an answer. That explanation doesn't fit the fact of ping not being able to find the host though.

                – Twisty Impersonator
                Jan 14 at 16:58











              • @TwistyImpersonator "So I think you're saying if ping got to the point of doing a DNS lookup in the course of its normal lookup workflow, it would work": Yes. "However, ping should end up trying DNS if the other lookup methods don't return an answer, implying the reason ping fails on its own is because another method it's trying before DNS is returning an answer": Apparently not. Maybe ping just gives up after trying a couple of methods. Maybe ping gives up after a timeout. Maybe ping never tries a DNS lookup because it thinks the hostname is not DNS-like.

                – Frederik Aalund
                Jan 14 at 19:41
















              12














              Try adding . to the DNS suffixes for that connection. I.e, go to:




              1. Ethernet Status

              2. Click Properties

              3. Internet Protocol Version 4

              4. Click Properties

              5. Click Advanced

              6. Append these DNS suffices (in order)

              7. Add . as a suffix.


              The same steps are illustrated in the following screenshot:





              This should make ping wolfman work.



              Explanation



              nslookup wolfman (name server lookup: wolfman) sends the hostname (wolfman) to the DNS (domain name system) to obtain the corresponding IP address. This is the sole purpose of the nslookup command. This works already, so we have verified that the DNS works and that wolfman indeed corresponds to an IP address.



              In contrast, ping wolfman needs to do two things:




              1. Get the IP that the hostname (wolfman) corresponds to.

              2. Send packets to the IP and listen for the response


              On Windows (even recent versions such as Windows 10), the first step can easily fail. For the sake of backwards compatibility, Windows supports various methods of hostname resolution (hosts file, DNS, NetBIOS/WINS, LMHOST file).



              Unfortunately, it seems that Windows' ping command doesn't always attempt a DNS lookup. I don't know the specific conditions that triggers this behaviour.



              Fortunately, we can force Windows to do a DNS lookup by using a FQDN (fully qualified domain name). In practice, we do this by suffixing a . dot to the hostname: wolfman.. Try ping wolfman. and verify that it works.



              The final step is to force Windows to append this dot itself. I've already shown how to do this in the beginning of this answer.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Just want to say that this turned out to be the factor that succeeded on a machine I was working on. Stupid though it seems. And not just for ping, but for other applications too. I'm not sure your explanation of what's tried when is quite right (but you acknowledge you're uncertain on that). But a big plus for mentioning that this failure can be easily diagnosed by attempting ping with the domain name with a dot suffix manually added.

                – gwideman
                Jun 28 '18 at 9:55













              • This doesn't make sense. You're positing that, "Windows' ping command doesn't always attempt a DNS lookup," but then recommend changing how DNS lookups are performed to solve that? It seems more likely that ping is performing a DNS lookup(s) but is doing them incorrectly, and that's why this fix works.

                – Twisty Impersonator
                Jan 14 at 13:57











              • @TwistyImpersonator I understand your confusion. The point is that Windows will attempt several methods of hostname resolution if given wolfman and a DNS lookup is (apparently) not a top priority among said methods. Now, if you use wolfman. instead, Windows will prioritize a DNS lookup over the other methods because wolfman. is a FQDN that (obviously) requires a DNS lookup.

                – Frederik Aalund
                Jan 14 at 14:24













              • So I think you're saying if ping got to the point of doing a DNS lookup in the course of its normal lookup workflow, it would work. However, ping should end up trying DNS if the other lookup methods don't return an answer, implying the reason ping fails on its own is because another method it's trying before DNS is returning an answer. That explanation doesn't fit the fact of ping not being able to find the host though.

                – Twisty Impersonator
                Jan 14 at 16:58











              • @TwistyImpersonator "So I think you're saying if ping got to the point of doing a DNS lookup in the course of its normal lookup workflow, it would work": Yes. "However, ping should end up trying DNS if the other lookup methods don't return an answer, implying the reason ping fails on its own is because another method it's trying before DNS is returning an answer": Apparently not. Maybe ping just gives up after trying a couple of methods. Maybe ping gives up after a timeout. Maybe ping never tries a DNS lookup because it thinks the hostname is not DNS-like.

                – Frederik Aalund
                Jan 14 at 19:41














              12












              12








              12







              Try adding . to the DNS suffixes for that connection. I.e, go to:




              1. Ethernet Status

              2. Click Properties

              3. Internet Protocol Version 4

              4. Click Properties

              5. Click Advanced

              6. Append these DNS suffices (in order)

              7. Add . as a suffix.


              The same steps are illustrated in the following screenshot:





              This should make ping wolfman work.



              Explanation



              nslookup wolfman (name server lookup: wolfman) sends the hostname (wolfman) to the DNS (domain name system) to obtain the corresponding IP address. This is the sole purpose of the nslookup command. This works already, so we have verified that the DNS works and that wolfman indeed corresponds to an IP address.



              In contrast, ping wolfman needs to do two things:




              1. Get the IP that the hostname (wolfman) corresponds to.

              2. Send packets to the IP and listen for the response


              On Windows (even recent versions such as Windows 10), the first step can easily fail. For the sake of backwards compatibility, Windows supports various methods of hostname resolution (hosts file, DNS, NetBIOS/WINS, LMHOST file).



              Unfortunately, it seems that Windows' ping command doesn't always attempt a DNS lookup. I don't know the specific conditions that triggers this behaviour.



              Fortunately, we can force Windows to do a DNS lookup by using a FQDN (fully qualified domain name). In practice, we do this by suffixing a . dot to the hostname: wolfman.. Try ping wolfman. and verify that it works.



              The final step is to force Windows to append this dot itself. I've already shown how to do this in the beginning of this answer.






              share|improve this answer













              Try adding . to the DNS suffixes for that connection. I.e, go to:




              1. Ethernet Status

              2. Click Properties

              3. Internet Protocol Version 4

              4. Click Properties

              5. Click Advanced

              6. Append these DNS suffices (in order)

              7. Add . as a suffix.


              The same steps are illustrated in the following screenshot:





              This should make ping wolfman work.



              Explanation



              nslookup wolfman (name server lookup: wolfman) sends the hostname (wolfman) to the DNS (domain name system) to obtain the corresponding IP address. This is the sole purpose of the nslookup command. This works already, so we have verified that the DNS works and that wolfman indeed corresponds to an IP address.



              In contrast, ping wolfman needs to do two things:




              1. Get the IP that the hostname (wolfman) corresponds to.

              2. Send packets to the IP and listen for the response


              On Windows (even recent versions such as Windows 10), the first step can easily fail. For the sake of backwards compatibility, Windows supports various methods of hostname resolution (hosts file, DNS, NetBIOS/WINS, LMHOST file).



              Unfortunately, it seems that Windows' ping command doesn't always attempt a DNS lookup. I don't know the specific conditions that triggers this behaviour.



              Fortunately, we can force Windows to do a DNS lookup by using a FQDN (fully qualified domain name). In practice, we do this by suffixing a . dot to the hostname: wolfman.. Try ping wolfman. and verify that it works.



              The final step is to force Windows to append this dot itself. I've already shown how to do this in the beginning of this answer.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Oct 9 '17 at 11:51









              Frederik AalundFrederik Aalund

              22123




              22123













              • Just want to say that this turned out to be the factor that succeeded on a machine I was working on. Stupid though it seems. And not just for ping, but for other applications too. I'm not sure your explanation of what's tried when is quite right (but you acknowledge you're uncertain on that). But a big plus for mentioning that this failure can be easily diagnosed by attempting ping with the domain name with a dot suffix manually added.

                – gwideman
                Jun 28 '18 at 9:55













              • This doesn't make sense. You're positing that, "Windows' ping command doesn't always attempt a DNS lookup," but then recommend changing how DNS lookups are performed to solve that? It seems more likely that ping is performing a DNS lookup(s) but is doing them incorrectly, and that's why this fix works.

                – Twisty Impersonator
                Jan 14 at 13:57











              • @TwistyImpersonator I understand your confusion. The point is that Windows will attempt several methods of hostname resolution if given wolfman and a DNS lookup is (apparently) not a top priority among said methods. Now, if you use wolfman. instead, Windows will prioritize a DNS lookup over the other methods because wolfman. is a FQDN that (obviously) requires a DNS lookup.

                – Frederik Aalund
                Jan 14 at 14:24













              • So I think you're saying if ping got to the point of doing a DNS lookup in the course of its normal lookup workflow, it would work. However, ping should end up trying DNS if the other lookup methods don't return an answer, implying the reason ping fails on its own is because another method it's trying before DNS is returning an answer. That explanation doesn't fit the fact of ping not being able to find the host though.

                – Twisty Impersonator
                Jan 14 at 16:58











              • @TwistyImpersonator "So I think you're saying if ping got to the point of doing a DNS lookup in the course of its normal lookup workflow, it would work": Yes. "However, ping should end up trying DNS if the other lookup methods don't return an answer, implying the reason ping fails on its own is because another method it's trying before DNS is returning an answer": Apparently not. Maybe ping just gives up after trying a couple of methods. Maybe ping gives up after a timeout. Maybe ping never tries a DNS lookup because it thinks the hostname is not DNS-like.

                – Frederik Aalund
                Jan 14 at 19:41



















              • Just want to say that this turned out to be the factor that succeeded on a machine I was working on. Stupid though it seems. And not just for ping, but for other applications too. I'm not sure your explanation of what's tried when is quite right (but you acknowledge you're uncertain on that). But a big plus for mentioning that this failure can be easily diagnosed by attempting ping with the domain name with a dot suffix manually added.

                – gwideman
                Jun 28 '18 at 9:55













              • This doesn't make sense. You're positing that, "Windows' ping command doesn't always attempt a DNS lookup," but then recommend changing how DNS lookups are performed to solve that? It seems more likely that ping is performing a DNS lookup(s) but is doing them incorrectly, and that's why this fix works.

                – Twisty Impersonator
                Jan 14 at 13:57











              • @TwistyImpersonator I understand your confusion. The point is that Windows will attempt several methods of hostname resolution if given wolfman and a DNS lookup is (apparently) not a top priority among said methods. Now, if you use wolfman. instead, Windows will prioritize a DNS lookup over the other methods because wolfman. is a FQDN that (obviously) requires a DNS lookup.

                – Frederik Aalund
                Jan 14 at 14:24













              • So I think you're saying if ping got to the point of doing a DNS lookup in the course of its normal lookup workflow, it would work. However, ping should end up trying DNS if the other lookup methods don't return an answer, implying the reason ping fails on its own is because another method it's trying before DNS is returning an answer. That explanation doesn't fit the fact of ping not being able to find the host though.

                – Twisty Impersonator
                Jan 14 at 16:58











              • @TwistyImpersonator "So I think you're saying if ping got to the point of doing a DNS lookup in the course of its normal lookup workflow, it would work": Yes. "However, ping should end up trying DNS if the other lookup methods don't return an answer, implying the reason ping fails on its own is because another method it's trying before DNS is returning an answer": Apparently not. Maybe ping just gives up after trying a couple of methods. Maybe ping gives up after a timeout. Maybe ping never tries a DNS lookup because it thinks the hostname is not DNS-like.

                – Frederik Aalund
                Jan 14 at 19:41

















              Just want to say that this turned out to be the factor that succeeded on a machine I was working on. Stupid though it seems. And not just for ping, but for other applications too. I'm not sure your explanation of what's tried when is quite right (but you acknowledge you're uncertain on that). But a big plus for mentioning that this failure can be easily diagnosed by attempting ping with the domain name with a dot suffix manually added.

              – gwideman
              Jun 28 '18 at 9:55







              Just want to say that this turned out to be the factor that succeeded on a machine I was working on. Stupid though it seems. And not just for ping, but for other applications too. I'm not sure your explanation of what's tried when is quite right (but you acknowledge you're uncertain on that). But a big plus for mentioning that this failure can be easily diagnosed by attempting ping with the domain name with a dot suffix manually added.

              – gwideman
              Jun 28 '18 at 9:55















              This doesn't make sense. You're positing that, "Windows' ping command doesn't always attempt a DNS lookup," but then recommend changing how DNS lookups are performed to solve that? It seems more likely that ping is performing a DNS lookup(s) but is doing them incorrectly, and that's why this fix works.

              – Twisty Impersonator
              Jan 14 at 13:57





              This doesn't make sense. You're positing that, "Windows' ping command doesn't always attempt a DNS lookup," but then recommend changing how DNS lookups are performed to solve that? It seems more likely that ping is performing a DNS lookup(s) but is doing them incorrectly, and that's why this fix works.

              – Twisty Impersonator
              Jan 14 at 13:57













              @TwistyImpersonator I understand your confusion. The point is that Windows will attempt several methods of hostname resolution if given wolfman and a DNS lookup is (apparently) not a top priority among said methods. Now, if you use wolfman. instead, Windows will prioritize a DNS lookup over the other methods because wolfman. is a FQDN that (obviously) requires a DNS lookup.

              – Frederik Aalund
              Jan 14 at 14:24







              @TwistyImpersonator I understand your confusion. The point is that Windows will attempt several methods of hostname resolution if given wolfman and a DNS lookup is (apparently) not a top priority among said methods. Now, if you use wolfman. instead, Windows will prioritize a DNS lookup over the other methods because wolfman. is a FQDN that (obviously) requires a DNS lookup.

              – Frederik Aalund
              Jan 14 at 14:24















              So I think you're saying if ping got to the point of doing a DNS lookup in the course of its normal lookup workflow, it would work. However, ping should end up trying DNS if the other lookup methods don't return an answer, implying the reason ping fails on its own is because another method it's trying before DNS is returning an answer. That explanation doesn't fit the fact of ping not being able to find the host though.

              – Twisty Impersonator
              Jan 14 at 16:58





              So I think you're saying if ping got to the point of doing a DNS lookup in the course of its normal lookup workflow, it would work. However, ping should end up trying DNS if the other lookup methods don't return an answer, implying the reason ping fails on its own is because another method it's trying before DNS is returning an answer. That explanation doesn't fit the fact of ping not being able to find the host though.

              – Twisty Impersonator
              Jan 14 at 16:58













              @TwistyImpersonator "So I think you're saying if ping got to the point of doing a DNS lookup in the course of its normal lookup workflow, it would work": Yes. "However, ping should end up trying DNS if the other lookup methods don't return an answer, implying the reason ping fails on its own is because another method it's trying before DNS is returning an answer": Apparently not. Maybe ping just gives up after trying a couple of methods. Maybe ping gives up after a timeout. Maybe ping never tries a DNS lookup because it thinks the hostname is not DNS-like.

              – Frederik Aalund
              Jan 14 at 19:41





              @TwistyImpersonator "So I think you're saying if ping got to the point of doing a DNS lookup in the course of its normal lookup workflow, it would work": Yes. "However, ping should end up trying DNS if the other lookup methods don't return an answer, implying the reason ping fails on its own is because another method it's trying before DNS is returning an answer": Apparently not. Maybe ping just gives up after trying a couple of methods. Maybe ping gives up after a timeout. Maybe ping never tries a DNS lookup because it thinks the hostname is not DNS-like.

              – Frederik Aalund
              Jan 14 at 19:41











              10














              nslookup works different to other commands when resolving names/ip addresses on Windows.



              The normal resolution method on Windows is as follows:




              1. The client checks to see if the name queried is its own.

              2. The client then searches a local Hosts file, a list of IP address and names stored on the local computer.

              3. Domain Name System (DNS) servers are queried.

              4. If the name is still not resolved, NetBIOS name resolution sequence is used as a backup. This order can be changed by configuring the NetBIOS node type of the client.


              nslookup on the other hand is used for testing Domain Name Servers.






              share|improve this answer



















              • 3





                Are there any settings that can move the NetBIOS query higher up in that list? I have the gut feeling that the NetBIOS lookup is involved somehow, but since the DNS query is definitely working I can't see how it would ever get to that step, if the sequence above is immutable.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:49
















              10














              nslookup works different to other commands when resolving names/ip addresses on Windows.



              The normal resolution method on Windows is as follows:




              1. The client checks to see if the name queried is its own.

              2. The client then searches a local Hosts file, a list of IP address and names stored on the local computer.

              3. Domain Name System (DNS) servers are queried.

              4. If the name is still not resolved, NetBIOS name resolution sequence is used as a backup. This order can be changed by configuring the NetBIOS node type of the client.


              nslookup on the other hand is used for testing Domain Name Servers.






              share|improve this answer



















              • 3





                Are there any settings that can move the NetBIOS query higher up in that list? I have the gut feeling that the NetBIOS lookup is involved somehow, but since the DNS query is definitely working I can't see how it would ever get to that step, if the sequence above is immutable.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:49














              10












              10








              10







              nslookup works different to other commands when resolving names/ip addresses on Windows.



              The normal resolution method on Windows is as follows:




              1. The client checks to see if the name queried is its own.

              2. The client then searches a local Hosts file, a list of IP address and names stored on the local computer.

              3. Domain Name System (DNS) servers are queried.

              4. If the name is still not resolved, NetBIOS name resolution sequence is used as a backup. This order can be changed by configuring the NetBIOS node type of the client.


              nslookup on the other hand is used for testing Domain Name Servers.






              share|improve this answer













              nslookup works different to other commands when resolving names/ip addresses on Windows.



              The normal resolution method on Windows is as follows:




              1. The client checks to see if the name queried is its own.

              2. The client then searches a local Hosts file, a list of IP address and names stored on the local computer.

              3. Domain Name System (DNS) servers are queried.

              4. If the name is still not resolved, NetBIOS name resolution sequence is used as a backup. This order can be changed by configuring the NetBIOS node type of the client.


              nslookup on the other hand is used for testing Domain Name Servers.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Nov 19 '12 at 21:29









              BryanBryan

              1,33321635




              1,33321635








              • 3





                Are there any settings that can move the NetBIOS query higher up in that list? I have the gut feeling that the NetBIOS lookup is involved somehow, but since the DNS query is definitely working I can't see how it would ever get to that step, if the sequence above is immutable.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:49














              • 3





                Are there any settings that can move the NetBIOS query higher up in that list? I have the gut feeling that the NetBIOS lookup is involved somehow, but since the DNS query is definitely working I can't see how it would ever get to that step, if the sequence above is immutable.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:49








              3




              3





              Are there any settings that can move the NetBIOS query higher up in that list? I have the gut feeling that the NetBIOS lookup is involved somehow, but since the DNS query is definitely working I can't see how it would ever get to that step, if the sequence above is immutable.

              – skiphoppy
              Nov 20 '12 at 14:49





              Are there any settings that can move the NetBIOS query higher up in that list? I have the gut feeling that the NetBIOS lookup is involved somehow, but since the DNS query is definitely working I can't see how it would ever get to that step, if the sequence above is immutable.

              – skiphoppy
              Nov 20 '12 at 14:49











              8














              I've struggled with a similar issue and have tried the solution suggested by @harrymc.
              I found what eventually seems to (at least somewhat) work at the microsoft technet forum
              (nslookup works but nothing else has DNS on standalone Win7 PC)



              Here's the quote:




              ... try to use the command below to flush and reset a client resolver cache for test.



              ipconfig /flushdns



              ipconfig /registerdns



              Please refer to the link below for more details.
              http://jefferyland.wordpress.com/2011/07/28/quick-review-of-flushdns-registerdns-and-dns-queries/




              So basically what was missing for me was ipconfig /registerdns






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1





                original answer by @harrymc now reflects the missing /registerdns command

                – Mick Halsband
                Jun 29 '15 at 10:35











              • I've been playing whack-a-mole with this issue on Win10 for about a year. When my laptop wakes up it can't find any corp servers, but external sites like microsoft.com do work. It seems to happen when changing WiFi networks (home/VPN vs office). flushdns solves the issue sometimes but not always. Today I tried the registerdns and that immediately corrected the problem. Tomorrow I'll try adding . to the end of a name (but ping already fails with FQDN for internal servers). It's very frustrating. And to top it off - if I wait a while the problem will resolve itself.

                – ripvlan
                Aug 14 '18 at 13:51
















              8














              I've struggled with a similar issue and have tried the solution suggested by @harrymc.
              I found what eventually seems to (at least somewhat) work at the microsoft technet forum
              (nslookup works but nothing else has DNS on standalone Win7 PC)



              Here's the quote:




              ... try to use the command below to flush and reset a client resolver cache for test.



              ipconfig /flushdns



              ipconfig /registerdns



              Please refer to the link below for more details.
              http://jefferyland.wordpress.com/2011/07/28/quick-review-of-flushdns-registerdns-and-dns-queries/




              So basically what was missing for me was ipconfig /registerdns






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1





                original answer by @harrymc now reflects the missing /registerdns command

                – Mick Halsband
                Jun 29 '15 at 10:35











              • I've been playing whack-a-mole with this issue on Win10 for about a year. When my laptop wakes up it can't find any corp servers, but external sites like microsoft.com do work. It seems to happen when changing WiFi networks (home/VPN vs office). flushdns solves the issue sometimes but not always. Today I tried the registerdns and that immediately corrected the problem. Tomorrow I'll try adding . to the end of a name (but ping already fails with FQDN for internal servers). It's very frustrating. And to top it off - if I wait a while the problem will resolve itself.

                – ripvlan
                Aug 14 '18 at 13:51














              8












              8








              8







              I've struggled with a similar issue and have tried the solution suggested by @harrymc.
              I found what eventually seems to (at least somewhat) work at the microsoft technet forum
              (nslookup works but nothing else has DNS on standalone Win7 PC)



              Here's the quote:




              ... try to use the command below to flush and reset a client resolver cache for test.



              ipconfig /flushdns



              ipconfig /registerdns



              Please refer to the link below for more details.
              http://jefferyland.wordpress.com/2011/07/28/quick-review-of-flushdns-registerdns-and-dns-queries/




              So basically what was missing for me was ipconfig /registerdns






              share|improve this answer













              I've struggled with a similar issue and have tried the solution suggested by @harrymc.
              I found what eventually seems to (at least somewhat) work at the microsoft technet forum
              (nslookup works but nothing else has DNS on standalone Win7 PC)



              Here's the quote:




              ... try to use the command below to flush and reset a client resolver cache for test.



              ipconfig /flushdns



              ipconfig /registerdns



              Please refer to the link below for more details.
              http://jefferyland.wordpress.com/2011/07/28/quick-review-of-flushdns-registerdns-and-dns-queries/




              So basically what was missing for me was ipconfig /registerdns







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Sep 22 '14 at 8:32









              Mick HalsbandMick Halsband

              41658




              41658








              • 1





                original answer by @harrymc now reflects the missing /registerdns command

                – Mick Halsband
                Jun 29 '15 at 10:35











              • I've been playing whack-a-mole with this issue on Win10 for about a year. When my laptop wakes up it can't find any corp servers, but external sites like microsoft.com do work. It seems to happen when changing WiFi networks (home/VPN vs office). flushdns solves the issue sometimes but not always. Today I tried the registerdns and that immediately corrected the problem. Tomorrow I'll try adding . to the end of a name (but ping already fails with FQDN for internal servers). It's very frustrating. And to top it off - if I wait a while the problem will resolve itself.

                – ripvlan
                Aug 14 '18 at 13:51














              • 1





                original answer by @harrymc now reflects the missing /registerdns command

                – Mick Halsband
                Jun 29 '15 at 10:35











              • I've been playing whack-a-mole with this issue on Win10 for about a year. When my laptop wakes up it can't find any corp servers, but external sites like microsoft.com do work. It seems to happen when changing WiFi networks (home/VPN vs office). flushdns solves the issue sometimes but not always. Today I tried the registerdns and that immediately corrected the problem. Tomorrow I'll try adding . to the end of a name (but ping already fails with FQDN for internal servers). It's very frustrating. And to top it off - if I wait a while the problem will resolve itself.

                – ripvlan
                Aug 14 '18 at 13:51








              1




              1





              original answer by @harrymc now reflects the missing /registerdns command

              – Mick Halsband
              Jun 29 '15 at 10:35





              original answer by @harrymc now reflects the missing /registerdns command

              – Mick Halsband
              Jun 29 '15 at 10:35













              I've been playing whack-a-mole with this issue on Win10 for about a year. When my laptop wakes up it can't find any corp servers, but external sites like microsoft.com do work. It seems to happen when changing WiFi networks (home/VPN vs office). flushdns solves the issue sometimes but not always. Today I tried the registerdns and that immediately corrected the problem. Tomorrow I'll try adding . to the end of a name (but ping already fails with FQDN for internal servers). It's very frustrating. And to top it off - if I wait a while the problem will resolve itself.

              – ripvlan
              Aug 14 '18 at 13:51





              I've been playing whack-a-mole with this issue on Win10 for about a year. When my laptop wakes up it can't find any corp servers, but external sites like microsoft.com do work. It seems to happen when changing WiFi networks (home/VPN vs office). flushdns solves the issue sometimes but not always. Today I tried the registerdns and that immediately corrected the problem. Tomorrow I'll try adding . to the end of a name (but ping already fails with FQDN for internal servers). It's very frustrating. And to top it off - if I wait a while the problem will resolve itself.

              – ripvlan
              Aug 14 '18 at 13:51











              6














              Just today we had the same issue, but the solution was different. So I thought, I'd add it for reference as this was the top most search result.





              • Problem: ping will not resolve a host name, but nslookup can. (Observed on 2 different Windows Server 2012 R2 hosts.)


              • Cause: (For each host) The host has more than one NIC connected and there are multiple default gateways configured.


              • Solution: (For each host) Remove default gateway from configuration of all NICs but one, so there reamains only one default gateway.






              share|improve this answer
























              • ah this did it for me. Perfect.

                – IAmTheSquidward
                Jan 26 '16 at 0:39











              • Short and simple

                – Frank Fu
                Mar 12 '18 at 11:37
















              6














              Just today we had the same issue, but the solution was different. So I thought, I'd add it for reference as this was the top most search result.





              • Problem: ping will not resolve a host name, but nslookup can. (Observed on 2 different Windows Server 2012 R2 hosts.)


              • Cause: (For each host) The host has more than one NIC connected and there are multiple default gateways configured.


              • Solution: (For each host) Remove default gateway from configuration of all NICs but one, so there reamains only one default gateway.






              share|improve this answer
























              • ah this did it for me. Perfect.

                – IAmTheSquidward
                Jan 26 '16 at 0:39











              • Short and simple

                – Frank Fu
                Mar 12 '18 at 11:37














              6












              6








              6







              Just today we had the same issue, but the solution was different. So I thought, I'd add it for reference as this was the top most search result.





              • Problem: ping will not resolve a host name, but nslookup can. (Observed on 2 different Windows Server 2012 R2 hosts.)


              • Cause: (For each host) The host has more than one NIC connected and there are multiple default gateways configured.


              • Solution: (For each host) Remove default gateway from configuration of all NICs but one, so there reamains only one default gateway.






              share|improve this answer













              Just today we had the same issue, but the solution was different. So I thought, I'd add it for reference as this was the top most search result.





              • Problem: ping will not resolve a host name, but nslookup can. (Observed on 2 different Windows Server 2012 R2 hosts.)


              • Cause: (For each host) The host has more than one NIC connected and there are multiple default gateways configured.


              • Solution: (For each host) Remove default gateway from configuration of all NICs but one, so there reamains only one default gateway.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Apr 28 '15 at 8:41









              djlaukdjlauk

              6112




              6112













              • ah this did it for me. Perfect.

                – IAmTheSquidward
                Jan 26 '16 at 0:39











              • Short and simple

                – Frank Fu
                Mar 12 '18 at 11:37



















              • ah this did it for me. Perfect.

                – IAmTheSquidward
                Jan 26 '16 at 0:39











              • Short and simple

                – Frank Fu
                Mar 12 '18 at 11:37

















              ah this did it for me. Perfect.

              – IAmTheSquidward
              Jan 26 '16 at 0:39





              ah this did it for me. Perfect.

              – IAmTheSquidward
              Jan 26 '16 at 0:39













              Short and simple

              – Frank Fu
              Mar 12 '18 at 11:37





              Short and simple

              – Frank Fu
              Mar 12 '18 at 11:37











              5














              Maybe wolfman.company.com is listed in C:Windowssystem32driversetchosts ?



              nslookup bypasses that file and always asks DNS, while ping and other tools first of all look up in "hosts" file, then in DNS.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Good thought! But I checked, and neither of the machines I've seen this issue with are listed in hosts.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:47
















              5














              Maybe wolfman.company.com is listed in C:Windowssystem32driversetchosts ?



              nslookup bypasses that file and always asks DNS, while ping and other tools first of all look up in "hosts" file, then in DNS.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Good thought! But I checked, and neither of the machines I've seen this issue with are listed in hosts.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:47














              5












              5








              5







              Maybe wolfman.company.com is listed in C:Windowssystem32driversetchosts ?



              nslookup bypasses that file and always asks DNS, while ping and other tools first of all look up in "hosts" file, then in DNS.






              share|improve this answer













              Maybe wolfman.company.com is listed in C:Windowssystem32driversetchosts ?



              nslookup bypasses that file and always asks DNS, while ping and other tools first of all look up in "hosts" file, then in DNS.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Nov 19 '12 at 20:04









              Mikhail KupchikMikhail Kupchik

              2,3011119




              2,3011119













              • Good thought! But I checked, and neither of the machines I've seen this issue with are listed in hosts.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:47



















              • Good thought! But I checked, and neither of the machines I've seen this issue with are listed in hosts.

                – skiphoppy
                Nov 20 '12 at 14:47

















              Good thought! But I checked, and neither of the machines I've seen this issue with are listed in hosts.

              – skiphoppy
              Nov 20 '12 at 14:47





              Good thought! But I checked, and neither of the machines I've seen this issue with are listed in hosts.

              – skiphoppy
              Nov 20 '12 at 14:47











              5














              I had the same problem on a Windows 2012R2 (=8.1) system, and tried all the above suggestions, but none of them would fix it:

              - Pinging the fully qualified name worked.

              - Pinging the unqualified name did not.

              - Both worked on several other systems, that had the same OS and apparently the same configuration.

              - All the necessary suffix search strings were there.

              (Note that some of the proposed fixes, like the workaround for the multi-label queries, are obviously irrelevant, as the unqualified name has only one part.)



              Then I noticed that the target system I was trying to ping did NOT have an IPv6 address. So I tried "ping -4 unqualified_name", and bingo! this worked.

              So for some reason, on this system only, ping only tried to resolve unqualified name->IPv6 address, and not unqualified name->IPv4.

              For me the fix was to disable IPv6 completely as I don't need it at all. But I'd be really interested to find a more gentle way to tell ping (or presumably the DNS client service) to try resolving both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.






              share|improve this answer




























                5














                I had the same problem on a Windows 2012R2 (=8.1) system, and tried all the above suggestions, but none of them would fix it:

                - Pinging the fully qualified name worked.

                - Pinging the unqualified name did not.

                - Both worked on several other systems, that had the same OS and apparently the same configuration.

                - All the necessary suffix search strings were there.

                (Note that some of the proposed fixes, like the workaround for the multi-label queries, are obviously irrelevant, as the unqualified name has only one part.)



                Then I noticed that the target system I was trying to ping did NOT have an IPv6 address. So I tried "ping -4 unqualified_name", and bingo! this worked.

                So for some reason, on this system only, ping only tried to resolve unqualified name->IPv6 address, and not unqualified name->IPv4.

                For me the fix was to disable IPv6 completely as I don't need it at all. But I'd be really interested to find a more gentle way to tell ping (or presumably the DNS client service) to try resolving both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.






                share|improve this answer


























                  5












                  5








                  5







                  I had the same problem on a Windows 2012R2 (=8.1) system, and tried all the above suggestions, but none of them would fix it:

                  - Pinging the fully qualified name worked.

                  - Pinging the unqualified name did not.

                  - Both worked on several other systems, that had the same OS and apparently the same configuration.

                  - All the necessary suffix search strings were there.

                  (Note that some of the proposed fixes, like the workaround for the multi-label queries, are obviously irrelevant, as the unqualified name has only one part.)



                  Then I noticed that the target system I was trying to ping did NOT have an IPv6 address. So I tried "ping -4 unqualified_name", and bingo! this worked.

                  So for some reason, on this system only, ping only tried to resolve unqualified name->IPv6 address, and not unqualified name->IPv4.

                  For me the fix was to disable IPv6 completely as I don't need it at all. But I'd be really interested to find a more gentle way to tell ping (or presumably the DNS client service) to try resolving both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.






                  share|improve this answer













                  I had the same problem on a Windows 2012R2 (=8.1) system, and tried all the above suggestions, but none of them would fix it:

                  - Pinging the fully qualified name worked.

                  - Pinging the unqualified name did not.

                  - Both worked on several other systems, that had the same OS and apparently the same configuration.

                  - All the necessary suffix search strings were there.

                  (Note that some of the proposed fixes, like the workaround for the multi-label queries, are obviously irrelevant, as the unqualified name has only one part.)



                  Then I noticed that the target system I was trying to ping did NOT have an IPv6 address. So I tried "ping -4 unqualified_name", and bingo! this worked.

                  So for some reason, on this system only, ping only tried to resolve unqualified name->IPv6 address, and not unqualified name->IPv4.

                  For me the fix was to disable IPv6 completely as I don't need it at all. But I'd be really interested to find a more gentle way to tell ping (or presumably the DNS client service) to try resolving both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 9 '15 at 16:18









                  Jean-François LarvoireJean-François Larvoire

                  5112




                  5112























                      2














                      Adding an entry in the file c:/windows/system32/drivers/etc/hosts might fix it.






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • That will fix it, but it will not resolve his issue on that machine, but it will not help him on other machines. Remember Hosts > DNS Resolver > DNS Server > NetBIOS name.

                        – The Dude
                        May 29 '15 at 15:10
















                      2














                      Adding an entry in the file c:/windows/system32/drivers/etc/hosts might fix it.






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • That will fix it, but it will not resolve his issue on that machine, but it will not help him on other machines. Remember Hosts > DNS Resolver > DNS Server > NetBIOS name.

                        – The Dude
                        May 29 '15 at 15:10














                      2












                      2








                      2







                      Adding an entry in the file c:/windows/system32/drivers/etc/hosts might fix it.






                      share|improve this answer















                      Adding an entry in the file c:/windows/system32/drivers/etc/hosts might fix it.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Nov 23 '12 at 5:59









                      Synetech

                      57.5k29186321




                      57.5k29186321










                      answered Nov 23 '12 at 5:38









                      Manoj AgarwalManoj Agarwal

                      19013




                      19013













                      • That will fix it, but it will not resolve his issue on that machine, but it will not help him on other machines. Remember Hosts > DNS Resolver > DNS Server > NetBIOS name.

                        – The Dude
                        May 29 '15 at 15:10



















                      • That will fix it, but it will not resolve his issue on that machine, but it will not help him on other machines. Remember Hosts > DNS Resolver > DNS Server > NetBIOS name.

                        – The Dude
                        May 29 '15 at 15:10

















                      That will fix it, but it will not resolve his issue on that machine, but it will not help him on other machines. Remember Hosts > DNS Resolver > DNS Server > NetBIOS name.

                      – The Dude
                      May 29 '15 at 15:10





                      That will fix it, but it will not resolve his issue on that machine, but it will not help him on other machines. Remember Hosts > DNS Resolver > DNS Server > NetBIOS name.

                      – The Dude
                      May 29 '15 at 15:10











                      2














                      I was trying to figure out why on one win 7 computer I can use ping server which works, and the other it can't resolve server. However both could ping server.lan which I didn't quite understand.



                      Turns out I had messed with some settings (DNS suffixes) to not have to use FQDNs while using the work VPN. I had to go add my local .lan to those suffixes in order to get both computers acting the same.



                      Go to Control Panel > Network and Internet > Network Connections and right click on your network connection and hit Properties. Click Internet Protocol Version 4 and hit the Properties button. Then the Advanced... button in this new window. Go to the DNS tab, this is where I had added a DNS suffix for my work but also needed one for my normal home connections.



                      Advanced TCP/IP Settings






                      share|improve this answer
























                      • I ran into a similar situation on a server with a static IP address. The first entry in the "Append these DNS suffixes" was blank AND the "DNS suffix for this connection" was blank. Other servers where it worked had the same blank "Append these DNS suffixes" BUT the "DNS suffix for this connection" populated.

                        – Tim Lewis
                        Apr 7 '16 at 17:29
















                      2














                      I was trying to figure out why on one win 7 computer I can use ping server which works, and the other it can't resolve server. However both could ping server.lan which I didn't quite understand.



                      Turns out I had messed with some settings (DNS suffixes) to not have to use FQDNs while using the work VPN. I had to go add my local .lan to those suffixes in order to get both computers acting the same.



                      Go to Control Panel > Network and Internet > Network Connections and right click on your network connection and hit Properties. Click Internet Protocol Version 4 and hit the Properties button. Then the Advanced... button in this new window. Go to the DNS tab, this is where I had added a DNS suffix for my work but also needed one for my normal home connections.



                      Advanced TCP/IP Settings






                      share|improve this answer
























                      • I ran into a similar situation on a server with a static IP address. The first entry in the "Append these DNS suffixes" was blank AND the "DNS suffix for this connection" was blank. Other servers where it worked had the same blank "Append these DNS suffixes" BUT the "DNS suffix for this connection" populated.

                        – Tim Lewis
                        Apr 7 '16 at 17:29














                      2












                      2








                      2







                      I was trying to figure out why on one win 7 computer I can use ping server which works, and the other it can't resolve server. However both could ping server.lan which I didn't quite understand.



                      Turns out I had messed with some settings (DNS suffixes) to not have to use FQDNs while using the work VPN. I had to go add my local .lan to those suffixes in order to get both computers acting the same.



                      Go to Control Panel > Network and Internet > Network Connections and right click on your network connection and hit Properties. Click Internet Protocol Version 4 and hit the Properties button. Then the Advanced... button in this new window. Go to the DNS tab, this is where I had added a DNS suffix for my work but also needed one for my normal home connections.



                      Advanced TCP/IP Settings






                      share|improve this answer













                      I was trying to figure out why on one win 7 computer I can use ping server which works, and the other it can't resolve server. However both could ping server.lan which I didn't quite understand.



                      Turns out I had messed with some settings (DNS suffixes) to not have to use FQDNs while using the work VPN. I had to go add my local .lan to those suffixes in order to get both computers acting the same.



                      Go to Control Panel > Network and Internet > Network Connections and right click on your network connection and hit Properties. Click Internet Protocol Version 4 and hit the Properties button. Then the Advanced... button in this new window. Go to the DNS tab, this is where I had added a DNS suffix for my work but also needed one for my normal home connections.



                      Advanced TCP/IP Settings







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Jan 1 '15 at 16:01









                      eresonanceeresonance

                      19315




                      19315













                      • I ran into a similar situation on a server with a static IP address. The first entry in the "Append these DNS suffixes" was blank AND the "DNS suffix for this connection" was blank. Other servers where it worked had the same blank "Append these DNS suffixes" BUT the "DNS suffix for this connection" populated.

                        – Tim Lewis
                        Apr 7 '16 at 17:29



















                      • I ran into a similar situation on a server with a static IP address. The first entry in the "Append these DNS suffixes" was blank AND the "DNS suffix for this connection" was blank. Other servers where it worked had the same blank "Append these DNS suffixes" BUT the "DNS suffix for this connection" populated.

                        – Tim Lewis
                        Apr 7 '16 at 17:29

















                      I ran into a similar situation on a server with a static IP address. The first entry in the "Append these DNS suffixes" was blank AND the "DNS suffix for this connection" was blank. Other servers where it worked had the same blank "Append these DNS suffixes" BUT the "DNS suffix for this connection" populated.

                      – Tim Lewis
                      Apr 7 '16 at 17:29





                      I ran into a similar situation on a server with a static IP address. The first entry in the "Append these DNS suffixes" was blank AND the "DNS suffix for this connection" was blank. Other servers where it worked had the same blank "Append these DNS suffixes" BUT the "DNS suffix for this connection" populated.

                      – Tim Lewis
                      Apr 7 '16 at 17:29











                      2














                      I came across this issue as well. The "easiest" way to fix it for me was to simply add a . to the end of the hostname. However this is rather annoying. Most networks don't require this. I'd rather not have to tell everyone else on the network to do this when they need to access the same resource.



                      I was looking at the suggestion from Frederik Aalund as a possible solution and noticed that they suggested switching from the default "Append primary and connection specific DNS suffixes" option. This made me think maybe my network was simply slightly missconfigured.



                      Looking at my DD-WRT settings, the "LAN Domain" was left unset. Setting that to an arbitrary string seems to have fixed this issue for all clients on my network without having special configuration on each machine, the solution I wanted! :)






                      share|improve this answer




























                        2














                        I came across this issue as well. The "easiest" way to fix it for me was to simply add a . to the end of the hostname. However this is rather annoying. Most networks don't require this. I'd rather not have to tell everyone else on the network to do this when they need to access the same resource.



                        I was looking at the suggestion from Frederik Aalund as a possible solution and noticed that they suggested switching from the default "Append primary and connection specific DNS suffixes" option. This made me think maybe my network was simply slightly missconfigured.



                        Looking at my DD-WRT settings, the "LAN Domain" was left unset. Setting that to an arbitrary string seems to have fixed this issue for all clients on my network without having special configuration on each machine, the solution I wanted! :)






                        share|improve this answer


























                          2












                          2








                          2







                          I came across this issue as well. The "easiest" way to fix it for me was to simply add a . to the end of the hostname. However this is rather annoying. Most networks don't require this. I'd rather not have to tell everyone else on the network to do this when they need to access the same resource.



                          I was looking at the suggestion from Frederik Aalund as a possible solution and noticed that they suggested switching from the default "Append primary and connection specific DNS suffixes" option. This made me think maybe my network was simply slightly missconfigured.



                          Looking at my DD-WRT settings, the "LAN Domain" was left unset. Setting that to an arbitrary string seems to have fixed this issue for all clients on my network without having special configuration on each machine, the solution I wanted! :)






                          share|improve this answer













                          I came across this issue as well. The "easiest" way to fix it for me was to simply add a . to the end of the hostname. However this is rather annoying. Most networks don't require this. I'd rather not have to tell everyone else on the network to do this when they need to access the same resource.



                          I was looking at the suggestion from Frederik Aalund as a possible solution and noticed that they suggested switching from the default "Append primary and connection specific DNS suffixes" option. This made me think maybe my network was simply slightly missconfigured.



                          Looking at my DD-WRT settings, the "LAN Domain" was left unset. Setting that to an arbitrary string seems to have fixed this issue for all clients on my network without having special configuration on each machine, the solution I wanted! :)







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Jun 12 '18 at 22:14









                          Cameron TacklindCameron Tacklind

                          1563




                          1563























                              1














                              i have encountered this when we migrated to windows 7 from windows XP, the issue was related to a Windows 7 Multi Label DNS Query issue.



                              Allow DNS Suffix Appending to Unqualified Multi-Label Name Queries - see:



                              http://computerstepbystep.com/allow_dns_suffix_appending_to_unqualified_multi_label_name_queries.html



                              Hope this helps






                              share|improve this answer





















                              • 2





                                Welcome to Super User! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

                                – Canadian Luke
                                Mar 21 '14 at 17:40


















                              1














                              i have encountered this when we migrated to windows 7 from windows XP, the issue was related to a Windows 7 Multi Label DNS Query issue.



                              Allow DNS Suffix Appending to Unqualified Multi-Label Name Queries - see:



                              http://computerstepbystep.com/allow_dns_suffix_appending_to_unqualified_multi_label_name_queries.html



                              Hope this helps






                              share|improve this answer





















                              • 2





                                Welcome to Super User! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

                                – Canadian Luke
                                Mar 21 '14 at 17:40
















                              1












                              1








                              1







                              i have encountered this when we migrated to windows 7 from windows XP, the issue was related to a Windows 7 Multi Label DNS Query issue.



                              Allow DNS Suffix Appending to Unqualified Multi-Label Name Queries - see:



                              http://computerstepbystep.com/allow_dns_suffix_appending_to_unqualified_multi_label_name_queries.html



                              Hope this helps






                              share|improve this answer















                              i have encountered this when we migrated to windows 7 from windows XP, the issue was related to a Windows 7 Multi Label DNS Query issue.



                              Allow DNS Suffix Appending to Unqualified Multi-Label Name Queries - see:



                              http://computerstepbystep.com/allow_dns_suffix_appending_to_unqualified_multi_label_name_queries.html



                              Hope this helps







                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited Mar 21 '14 at 18:13









                              Dave M

                              12.8k92838




                              12.8k92838










                              answered Mar 21 '14 at 17:23









                              Sony NSSony NS

                              112




                              112








                              • 2





                                Welcome to Super User! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

                                – Canadian Luke
                                Mar 21 '14 at 17:40
















                              • 2





                                Welcome to Super User! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

                                – Canadian Luke
                                Mar 21 '14 at 17:40










                              2




                              2





                              Welcome to Super User! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

                              – Canadian Luke
                              Mar 21 '14 at 17:40







                              Welcome to Super User! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

                              – Canadian Luke
                              Mar 21 '14 at 17:40













                              1














                              If on mac os x it might be an DNS Cache problem:



                              Dump the cache



                              sudo killall -HUP mDNSResponder
                              sudo dscacheutil -flushcache





                              share|improve this answer
























                              • OP asks about Windows XP and question is tagged Windows.

                                – P-L
                                Oct 20 '17 at 15:38











                              • Maybe it is helpful to others. I will leave it, the answer was here now for more than 3 years. Why delete now?

                                – Christian
                                Oct 24 '17 at 11:12
















                              1














                              If on mac os x it might be an DNS Cache problem:



                              Dump the cache



                              sudo killall -HUP mDNSResponder
                              sudo dscacheutil -flushcache





                              share|improve this answer
























                              • OP asks about Windows XP and question is tagged Windows.

                                – P-L
                                Oct 20 '17 at 15:38











                              • Maybe it is helpful to others. I will leave it, the answer was here now for more than 3 years. Why delete now?

                                – Christian
                                Oct 24 '17 at 11:12














                              1












                              1








                              1







                              If on mac os x it might be an DNS Cache problem:



                              Dump the cache



                              sudo killall -HUP mDNSResponder
                              sudo dscacheutil -flushcache





                              share|improve this answer













                              If on mac os x it might be an DNS Cache problem:



                              Dump the cache



                              sudo killall -HUP mDNSResponder
                              sudo dscacheutil -flushcache






                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Aug 8 '14 at 7:53









                              ChristianChristian

                              16017




                              16017













                              • OP asks about Windows XP and question is tagged Windows.

                                – P-L
                                Oct 20 '17 at 15:38











                              • Maybe it is helpful to others. I will leave it, the answer was here now for more than 3 years. Why delete now?

                                – Christian
                                Oct 24 '17 at 11:12



















                              • OP asks about Windows XP and question is tagged Windows.

                                – P-L
                                Oct 20 '17 at 15:38











                              • Maybe it is helpful to others. I will leave it, the answer was here now for more than 3 years. Why delete now?

                                – Christian
                                Oct 24 '17 at 11:12

















                              OP asks about Windows XP and question is tagged Windows.

                              – P-L
                              Oct 20 '17 at 15:38





                              OP asks about Windows XP and question is tagged Windows.

                              – P-L
                              Oct 20 '17 at 15:38













                              Maybe it is helpful to others. I will leave it, the answer was here now for more than 3 years. Why delete now?

                              – Christian
                              Oct 24 '17 at 11:12





                              Maybe it is helpful to others. I will leave it, the answer was here now for more than 3 years. Why delete now?

                              – Christian
                              Oct 24 '17 at 11:12











                              1














                              I'm picking this up because it bothered me the last year and maybe I found a workaround.



                              For me it seemed some dns-caching-system within the windows client is faulty. Windows 7 and 8.1 are affected by this... cannot say much about Windows XP anymore. ping doesn't resolve the name. it's not the icmp-part which is important but the name resolving part). nslookup is designed to query the nameserver and does exactly that and no windows name-hierarchy-resolving.



                              Restarting the dnscache service helped everytime. But since I disabled IPv6 on all client-interfaces the problem didn't occured anymore.



                              Cheers!






                              share|improve this answer
























                              • Disabling IPv6 may not be a viable solution for everybody (and it sounds anecdotal at best, anyway). Everything else you say seems to have been said already in this thread (e.g., harrymc’s comment “Sometimes just stopping and restarting the service fixes DNS problems”, two years ago).

                                – G-Man
                                Nov 3 '14 at 15:31
















                              1














                              I'm picking this up because it bothered me the last year and maybe I found a workaround.



                              For me it seemed some dns-caching-system within the windows client is faulty. Windows 7 and 8.1 are affected by this... cannot say much about Windows XP anymore. ping doesn't resolve the name. it's not the icmp-part which is important but the name resolving part). nslookup is designed to query the nameserver and does exactly that and no windows name-hierarchy-resolving.



                              Restarting the dnscache service helped everytime. But since I disabled IPv6 on all client-interfaces the problem didn't occured anymore.



                              Cheers!






                              share|improve this answer
























                              • Disabling IPv6 may not be a viable solution for everybody (and it sounds anecdotal at best, anyway). Everything else you say seems to have been said already in this thread (e.g., harrymc’s comment “Sometimes just stopping and restarting the service fixes DNS problems”, two years ago).

                                – G-Man
                                Nov 3 '14 at 15:31














                              1












                              1








                              1







                              I'm picking this up because it bothered me the last year and maybe I found a workaround.



                              For me it seemed some dns-caching-system within the windows client is faulty. Windows 7 and 8.1 are affected by this... cannot say much about Windows XP anymore. ping doesn't resolve the name. it's not the icmp-part which is important but the name resolving part). nslookup is designed to query the nameserver and does exactly that and no windows name-hierarchy-resolving.



                              Restarting the dnscache service helped everytime. But since I disabled IPv6 on all client-interfaces the problem didn't occured anymore.



                              Cheers!






                              share|improve this answer













                              I'm picking this up because it bothered me the last year and maybe I found a workaround.



                              For me it seemed some dns-caching-system within the windows client is faulty. Windows 7 and 8.1 are affected by this... cannot say much about Windows XP anymore. ping doesn't resolve the name. it's not the icmp-part which is important but the name resolving part). nslookup is designed to query the nameserver and does exactly that and no windows name-hierarchy-resolving.



                              Restarting the dnscache service helped everytime. But since I disabled IPv6 on all client-interfaces the problem didn't occured anymore.



                              Cheers!







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Nov 3 '14 at 14:58









                              grimgrim

                              111




                              111













                              • Disabling IPv6 may not be a viable solution for everybody (and it sounds anecdotal at best, anyway). Everything else you say seems to have been said already in this thread (e.g., harrymc’s comment “Sometimes just stopping and restarting the service fixes DNS problems”, two years ago).

                                – G-Man
                                Nov 3 '14 at 15:31



















                              • Disabling IPv6 may not be a viable solution for everybody (and it sounds anecdotal at best, anyway). Everything else you say seems to have been said already in this thread (e.g., harrymc’s comment “Sometimes just stopping and restarting the service fixes DNS problems”, two years ago).

                                – G-Man
                                Nov 3 '14 at 15:31

















                              Disabling IPv6 may not be a viable solution for everybody (and it sounds anecdotal at best, anyway). Everything else you say seems to have been said already in this thread (e.g., harrymc’s comment “Sometimes just stopping and restarting the service fixes DNS problems”, two years ago).

                              – G-Man
                              Nov 3 '14 at 15:31





                              Disabling IPv6 may not be a viable solution for everybody (and it sounds anecdotal at best, anyway). Everything else you say seems to have been said already in this thread (e.g., harrymc’s comment “Sometimes just stopping and restarting the service fixes DNS problems”, two years ago).

                              – G-Man
                              Nov 3 '14 at 15:31











                              1














                              I might be wrong on this because its based on my long-forgotten NT4 ressource-kit days.



                              As fare I can recall PING uses Netbios/WINS and DNS (in that order, at least if you don't specify a FQDN).



                              WINS is gone many year ago but you might still have Netbios enabled on your interface and PING therefore might use netbios that might not give you any result. Especially if traffic is passing a router somewhere.



                              Just disable Netbios and Ping will use DNS as first priority and append the registered DNS Surffic on the interface to your hostname.






                              share|improve this answer




























                                1














                                I might be wrong on this because its based on my long-forgotten NT4 ressource-kit days.



                                As fare I can recall PING uses Netbios/WINS and DNS (in that order, at least if you don't specify a FQDN).



                                WINS is gone many year ago but you might still have Netbios enabled on your interface and PING therefore might use netbios that might not give you any result. Especially if traffic is passing a router somewhere.



                                Just disable Netbios and Ping will use DNS as first priority and append the registered DNS Surffic on the interface to your hostname.






                                share|improve this answer


























                                  1












                                  1








                                  1







                                  I might be wrong on this because its based on my long-forgotten NT4 ressource-kit days.



                                  As fare I can recall PING uses Netbios/WINS and DNS (in that order, at least if you don't specify a FQDN).



                                  WINS is gone many year ago but you might still have Netbios enabled on your interface and PING therefore might use netbios that might not give you any result. Especially if traffic is passing a router somewhere.



                                  Just disable Netbios and Ping will use DNS as first priority and append the registered DNS Surffic on the interface to your hostname.






                                  share|improve this answer













                                  I might be wrong on this because its based on my long-forgotten NT4 ressource-kit days.



                                  As fare I can recall PING uses Netbios/WINS and DNS (in that order, at least if you don't specify a FQDN).



                                  WINS is gone many year ago but you might still have Netbios enabled on your interface and PING therefore might use netbios that might not give you any result. Especially if traffic is passing a router somewhere.



                                  Just disable Netbios and Ping will use DNS as first priority and append the registered DNS Surffic on the interface to your hostname.







                                  share|improve this answer












                                  share|improve this answer



                                  share|improve this answer










                                  answered Jul 5 '18 at 20:41









                                  MrCalvinMrCalvin

                                  17015




                                  17015























                                      0














                                      I have just had this problem, and found something quite peculiar, and managed to fix it Lol



                                      Basically, if you have any entries in your hosts file, that are the same as the IP your ping is trying to resolve to, it will fail.



                                      For example, if in your DNS, you have a record for www.example.com - 10.0.0.20, but then you have an entry in your client's hosts file, 10.0.0.20 somethingelse.com, you will not be able to ping www.example.com



                                      Strange huh






                                      share|improve this answer




























                                        0














                                        I have just had this problem, and found something quite peculiar, and managed to fix it Lol



                                        Basically, if you have any entries in your hosts file, that are the same as the IP your ping is trying to resolve to, it will fail.



                                        For example, if in your DNS, you have a record for www.example.com - 10.0.0.20, but then you have an entry in your client's hosts file, 10.0.0.20 somethingelse.com, you will not be able to ping www.example.com



                                        Strange huh






                                        share|improve this answer


























                                          0












                                          0








                                          0







                                          I have just had this problem, and found something quite peculiar, and managed to fix it Lol



                                          Basically, if you have any entries in your hosts file, that are the same as the IP your ping is trying to resolve to, it will fail.



                                          For example, if in your DNS, you have a record for www.example.com - 10.0.0.20, but then you have an entry in your client's hosts file, 10.0.0.20 somethingelse.com, you will not be able to ping www.example.com



                                          Strange huh






                                          share|improve this answer













                                          I have just had this problem, and found something quite peculiar, and managed to fix it Lol



                                          Basically, if you have any entries in your hosts file, that are the same as the IP your ping is trying to resolve to, it will fail.



                                          For example, if in your DNS, you have a record for www.example.com - 10.0.0.20, but then you have an entry in your client's hosts file, 10.0.0.20 somethingelse.com, you will not be able to ping www.example.com



                                          Strange huh







                                          share|improve this answer












                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer










                                          answered Jan 14 '15 at 21:25









                                          Just Lucky ReallyJust Lucky Really

                                          796414




                                          796414























                                              0














                                              In my case what solved this problem was to add the domain of the host I was trying to ping to a group policy option named "DNS Suffix Search List".



                                              The procedure in short is this: Open gpedit.msc and navigate to Computer Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> Network -> DNS Client > DNS Suffix Search List, set it to "Enabled" and add the domain name to the list (the list is empty by default).



                                              A more detailed description of these steps can be found here






                                              share|improve this answer




























                                                0














                                                In my case what solved this problem was to add the domain of the host I was trying to ping to a group policy option named "DNS Suffix Search List".



                                                The procedure in short is this: Open gpedit.msc and navigate to Computer Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> Network -> DNS Client > DNS Suffix Search List, set it to "Enabled" and add the domain name to the list (the list is empty by default).



                                                A more detailed description of these steps can be found here






                                                share|improve this answer


























                                                  0












                                                  0








                                                  0







                                                  In my case what solved this problem was to add the domain of the host I was trying to ping to a group policy option named "DNS Suffix Search List".



                                                  The procedure in short is this: Open gpedit.msc and navigate to Computer Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> Network -> DNS Client > DNS Suffix Search List, set it to "Enabled" and add the domain name to the list (the list is empty by default).



                                                  A more detailed description of these steps can be found here






                                                  share|improve this answer













                                                  In my case what solved this problem was to add the domain of the host I was trying to ping to a group policy option named "DNS Suffix Search List".



                                                  The procedure in short is this: Open gpedit.msc and navigate to Computer Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> Network -> DNS Client > DNS Suffix Search List, set it to "Enabled" and add the domain name to the list (the list is empty by default).



                                                  A more detailed description of these steps can be found here







                                                  share|improve this answer












                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                  share|improve this answer










                                                  answered Feb 13 at 16:57









                                                  ndemoundemou

                                                  349211




                                                  349211























                                                      0














                                                      I had the same problem and turns out another machine had the same IP address, and that was causing it.



                                                      Changed IP back to DHCP and everything was working fine.






                                                      share|improve this answer


























                                                      • nslookup worked because it doesn't need to communicate with the other host. ping does need to communicate and obviously breaks.

                                                        – ndemou
                                                        Feb 13 at 17:02











                                                      • @ndemou: That explanation doesn't make any sense.  Yes, it is ping's job to try to communicate with the other host, but the first step in that process is to get the other host's IP address.  If it gets the other host's IP address, it tells you so; if it then cannot communicate with the other host, it ultimately reports "100% loss".  But, in the question, ping is failing even to get an address.  (Try ping bbbbbbb.com and ping bbbbbb.com for comparison.)

                                                        – Scott
                                                        Feb 13 at 17:57











                                                      • You are right @Scott. I was editing Klaus' answer and while reading his description of the problem I forgot that this questions particular problem with ping is that it doesn't resolve. Can't be sure but I would bet now that Klaus was just not getting replies.

                                                        – ndemou
                                                        Feb 14 at 7:37
















                                                      0














                                                      I had the same problem and turns out another machine had the same IP address, and that was causing it.



                                                      Changed IP back to DHCP and everything was working fine.






                                                      share|improve this answer


























                                                      • nslookup worked because it doesn't need to communicate with the other host. ping does need to communicate and obviously breaks.

                                                        – ndemou
                                                        Feb 13 at 17:02











                                                      • @ndemou: That explanation doesn't make any sense.  Yes, it is ping's job to try to communicate with the other host, but the first step in that process is to get the other host's IP address.  If it gets the other host's IP address, it tells you so; if it then cannot communicate with the other host, it ultimately reports "100% loss".  But, in the question, ping is failing even to get an address.  (Try ping bbbbbbb.com and ping bbbbbb.com for comparison.)

                                                        – Scott
                                                        Feb 13 at 17:57











                                                      • You are right @Scott. I was editing Klaus' answer and while reading his description of the problem I forgot that this questions particular problem with ping is that it doesn't resolve. Can't be sure but I would bet now that Klaus was just not getting replies.

                                                        – ndemou
                                                        Feb 14 at 7:37














                                                      0












                                                      0








                                                      0







                                                      I had the same problem and turns out another machine had the same IP address, and that was causing it.



                                                      Changed IP back to DHCP and everything was working fine.






                                                      share|improve this answer















                                                      I had the same problem and turns out another machine had the same IP address, and that was causing it.



                                                      Changed IP back to DHCP and everything was working fine.







                                                      share|improve this answer














                                                      share|improve this answer



                                                      share|improve this answer








                                                      edited Feb 13 at 17:58









                                                      ndemou

                                                      349211




                                                      349211










                                                      answered Apr 9 '15 at 9:43









                                                      KlausKlaus

                                                      213




                                                      213













                                                      • nslookup worked because it doesn't need to communicate with the other host. ping does need to communicate and obviously breaks.

                                                        – ndemou
                                                        Feb 13 at 17:02











                                                      • @ndemou: That explanation doesn't make any sense.  Yes, it is ping's job to try to communicate with the other host, but the first step in that process is to get the other host's IP address.  If it gets the other host's IP address, it tells you so; if it then cannot communicate with the other host, it ultimately reports "100% loss".  But, in the question, ping is failing even to get an address.  (Try ping bbbbbbb.com and ping bbbbbb.com for comparison.)

                                                        – Scott
                                                        Feb 13 at 17:57











                                                      • You are right @Scott. I was editing Klaus' answer and while reading his description of the problem I forgot that this questions particular problem with ping is that it doesn't resolve. Can't be sure but I would bet now that Klaus was just not getting replies.

                                                        – ndemou
                                                        Feb 14 at 7:37



















                                                      • nslookup worked because it doesn't need to communicate with the other host. ping does need to communicate and obviously breaks.

                                                        – ndemou
                                                        Feb 13 at 17:02











                                                      • @ndemou: That explanation doesn't make any sense.  Yes, it is ping's job to try to communicate with the other host, but the first step in that process is to get the other host's IP address.  If it gets the other host's IP address, it tells you so; if it then cannot communicate with the other host, it ultimately reports "100% loss".  But, in the question, ping is failing even to get an address.  (Try ping bbbbbbb.com and ping bbbbbb.com for comparison.)

                                                        – Scott
                                                        Feb 13 at 17:57











                                                      • You are right @Scott. I was editing Klaus' answer and while reading his description of the problem I forgot that this questions particular problem with ping is that it doesn't resolve. Can't be sure but I would bet now that Klaus was just not getting replies.

                                                        – ndemou
                                                        Feb 14 at 7:37

















                                                      nslookup worked because it doesn't need to communicate with the other host. ping does need to communicate and obviously breaks.

                                                      – ndemou
                                                      Feb 13 at 17:02





                                                      nslookup worked because it doesn't need to communicate with the other host. ping does need to communicate and obviously breaks.

                                                      – ndemou
                                                      Feb 13 at 17:02













                                                      @ndemou: That explanation doesn't make any sense.  Yes, it is ping's job to try to communicate with the other host, but the first step in that process is to get the other host's IP address.  If it gets the other host's IP address, it tells you so; if it then cannot communicate with the other host, it ultimately reports "100% loss".  But, in the question, ping is failing even to get an address.  (Try ping bbbbbbb.com and ping bbbbbb.com for comparison.)

                                                      – Scott
                                                      Feb 13 at 17:57





                                                      @ndemou: That explanation doesn't make any sense.  Yes, it is ping's job to try to communicate with the other host, but the first step in that process is to get the other host's IP address.  If it gets the other host's IP address, it tells you so; if it then cannot communicate with the other host, it ultimately reports "100% loss".  But, in the question, ping is failing even to get an address.  (Try ping bbbbbbb.com and ping bbbbbb.com for comparison.)

                                                      – Scott
                                                      Feb 13 at 17:57













                                                      You are right @Scott. I was editing Klaus' answer and while reading his description of the problem I forgot that this questions particular problem with ping is that it doesn't resolve. Can't be sure but I would bet now that Klaus was just not getting replies.

                                                      – ndemou
                                                      Feb 14 at 7:37





                                                      You are right @Scott. I was editing Klaus' answer and while reading his description of the problem I forgot that this questions particular problem with ping is that it doesn't resolve. Can't be sure but I would bet now that Klaus was just not getting replies.

                                                      – ndemou
                                                      Feb 14 at 7:37











                                                      0














                                                      None of the solutions here worked for me. What did work for me was reconnecting to my work's vpn using OpenVPN. Then after disconnecting everything continued to work.



                                                      I believe the issue was related to the power going out while my computer was connected with openVPN. The only way I figured this out was by using WireShark. I noticed that the destination IPs for all the queries were going to IPs on my work's internal network.






                                                      share|improve this answer








                                                      New contributor




                                                      Bela is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                                                        0














                                                        None of the solutions here worked for me. What did work for me was reconnecting to my work's vpn using OpenVPN. Then after disconnecting everything continued to work.



                                                        I believe the issue was related to the power going out while my computer was connected with openVPN. The only way I figured this out was by using WireShark. I noticed that the destination IPs for all the queries were going to IPs on my work's internal network.






                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                        New contributor




                                                        Bela is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.























                                                          0












                                                          0








                                                          0







                                                          None of the solutions here worked for me. What did work for me was reconnecting to my work's vpn using OpenVPN. Then after disconnecting everything continued to work.



                                                          I believe the issue was related to the power going out while my computer was connected with openVPN. The only way I figured this out was by using WireShark. I noticed that the destination IPs for all the queries were going to IPs on my work's internal network.






                                                          share|improve this answer








                                                          New contributor




                                                          Bela is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.










                                                          None of the solutions here worked for me. What did work for me was reconnecting to my work's vpn using OpenVPN. Then after disconnecting everything continued to work.



                                                          I believe the issue was related to the power going out while my computer was connected with openVPN. The only way I figured this out was by using WireShark. I noticed that the destination IPs for all the queries were going to IPs on my work's internal network.







                                                          share|improve this answer








                                                          New contributor




                                                          Bela is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                          share|improve this answer



                                                          share|improve this answer






                                                          New contributor




                                                          Bela is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                          answered 2 days ago









                                                          BelaBela

                                                          101




                                                          101




                                                          New contributor




                                                          Bela is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                                          New contributor





                                                          Bela is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                                          Bela is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.























                                                              -1














                                                              ping uses the ICMP protocol, specifically the 'Echo Request' and 'Echo Reply'.



                                                              many networks disable ICMP utilities in order to prevent attacks or basic network scanning. I've found many routers you purchase come with a setting to disable ping and like utilities enabled by default.



                                                              you can find more about ICMP here:



                                                              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Control_Message_Protocol






                                                              share|improve this answer



















                                                              • 8





                                                                Yes, but before using ICMP, the domain has to be resolved to an IP address as usual. So this is not the issue here.

                                                                – Michael
                                                                Nov 23 '12 at 2:25
















                                                              -1














                                                              ping uses the ICMP protocol, specifically the 'Echo Request' and 'Echo Reply'.



                                                              many networks disable ICMP utilities in order to prevent attacks or basic network scanning. I've found many routers you purchase come with a setting to disable ping and like utilities enabled by default.



                                                              you can find more about ICMP here:



                                                              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Control_Message_Protocol






                                                              share|improve this answer



















                                                              • 8





                                                                Yes, but before using ICMP, the domain has to be resolved to an IP address as usual. So this is not the issue here.

                                                                – Michael
                                                                Nov 23 '12 at 2:25














                                                              -1












                                                              -1








                                                              -1







                                                              ping uses the ICMP protocol, specifically the 'Echo Request' and 'Echo Reply'.



                                                              many networks disable ICMP utilities in order to prevent attacks or basic network scanning. I've found many routers you purchase come with a setting to disable ping and like utilities enabled by default.



                                                              you can find more about ICMP here:



                                                              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Control_Message_Protocol






                                                              share|improve this answer













                                                              ping uses the ICMP protocol, specifically the 'Echo Request' and 'Echo Reply'.



                                                              many networks disable ICMP utilities in order to prevent attacks or basic network scanning. I've found many routers you purchase come with a setting to disable ping and like utilities enabled by default.



                                                              you can find more about ICMP here:



                                                              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Control_Message_Protocol







                                                              share|improve this answer












                                                              share|improve this answer



                                                              share|improve this answer










                                                              answered Nov 22 '12 at 12:34









                                                              JohnnieJohnnie

                                                              26216




                                                              26216








                                                              • 8





                                                                Yes, but before using ICMP, the domain has to be resolved to an IP address as usual. So this is not the issue here.

                                                                – Michael
                                                                Nov 23 '12 at 2:25














                                                              • 8





                                                                Yes, but before using ICMP, the domain has to be resolved to an IP address as usual. So this is not the issue here.

                                                                – Michael
                                                                Nov 23 '12 at 2:25








                                                              8




                                                              8





                                                              Yes, but before using ICMP, the domain has to be resolved to an IP address as usual. So this is not the issue here.

                                                              – Michael
                                                              Nov 23 '12 at 2:25





                                                              Yes, but before using ICMP, the domain has to be resolved to an IP address as usual. So this is not the issue here.

                                                              – Michael
                                                              Nov 23 '12 at 2:25


















                                                              draft saved

                                                              draft discarded




















































                                                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


                                                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                              But avoid



                                                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                              draft saved


                                                              draft discarded














                                                              StackExchange.ready(
                                                              function () {
                                                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f495759%2fwhy-is-ping-unable-to-resolve-a-name-when-nslookup-works-fine%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                              }
                                                              );

                                                              Post as a guest















                                                              Required, but never shown





















































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown

































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown











                                                              Popular posts from this blog

                                                              VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...

                                                              Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Mirandela Referências Menu de...

                                                              looking for continuous Screen Capture for retroactivly reproducing errors, timeback machineRolling desktop...