Table of Chebyshev psi functionHow to evaluate the sum over a hyperplaneusing a Mathematica function to...

Is divide-by-zero a security vulnerability?

Replacement ford fiesta radiator has extra hose

Contradiction with Banach Fixed Point Theorem

Should I choose Itemized or Standard deduction?

I can't die. Who am I?

Reason Why Dimensional Travelling Would be Restricted

How can I be pwned if I'm not registered on that site?

Equivalent to "source" in OpenBSD?

When should a commit not be version tagged?

Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?

Is there a German word for “analytics”?

What is the difference between ashamed and shamed?

How to speed up a process

What is a term for a function that when called repeatedly, has the same effect as calling once?

How to mitigate "bandwagon attacking" from players?

Auto Insert date into Notepad

What is the difference between throw e and throw new Exception(e)?

Casually inserting sexuality

Book where the good guy lives backwards through time and the bad guy lives forward

How to count occurrences of Friday 13th

It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)

When was drinking water recognized as crucial in marathon running?

Did 5.25" floppies undergo a change in magnetic coating?

Easy code troubleshooting in wordpress



Table of Chebyshev psi function


How to evaluate the sum over a hyperplaneusing a Mathematica function to define a new functionSwitching the ordinate and abscissa causes problem in `ParametricPlot`How to factorise a variable out of an indefinite sum?Define a Recurrence Table involving other tablesExpand series unevaluatedExpress anonymous with formal parametersSeries expansion of function, which commutes with differentiationUsing Piecewise to plot a defined functionHow to study the behavior of this series in Mathematica?













3












$begingroup$


This should be easy, but for some reason I'm struggling. The Chebyshev psi function is given as the sum from 0 to x of the von Mangoldt function MangoldtLambda[x]. I want to tabulate it. Ideally, I'd like to express the function using Sum, but I can't find the right form. This doesn't work:



TableForm[
Table[With[{k = 10}, Sum[N[MangoldtLambda[x], 5], {x, 0, k}]],
{x, 0, 10}]]


This produces a series that makes no sense at all:



TableForm[
Table[With[{k = 10}, Sum[N[MangoldtLambda[x], 5], {k, 0, x}]],
{x, 0, 10}]]


Accumulate doesn't work either:



TableForm[Table[Accumulate[N[MangoldtLambda[x], 5]], {x, 0, 10}]]


Clearly I'm suffering from a failure of imagination, but I'd appreciate help.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    This should be easy, but for some reason I'm struggling. The Chebyshev psi function is given as the sum from 0 to x of the von Mangoldt function MangoldtLambda[x]. I want to tabulate it. Ideally, I'd like to express the function using Sum, but I can't find the right form. This doesn't work:



    TableForm[
    Table[With[{k = 10}, Sum[N[MangoldtLambda[x], 5], {x, 0, k}]],
    {x, 0, 10}]]


    This produces a series that makes no sense at all:



    TableForm[
    Table[With[{k = 10}, Sum[N[MangoldtLambda[x], 5], {k, 0, x}]],
    {x, 0, 10}]]


    Accumulate doesn't work either:



    TableForm[Table[Accumulate[N[MangoldtLambda[x], 5]], {x, 0, 10}]]


    Clearly I'm suffering from a failure of imagination, but I'd appreciate help.










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      This should be easy, but for some reason I'm struggling. The Chebyshev psi function is given as the sum from 0 to x of the von Mangoldt function MangoldtLambda[x]. I want to tabulate it. Ideally, I'd like to express the function using Sum, but I can't find the right form. This doesn't work:



      TableForm[
      Table[With[{k = 10}, Sum[N[MangoldtLambda[x], 5], {x, 0, k}]],
      {x, 0, 10}]]


      This produces a series that makes no sense at all:



      TableForm[
      Table[With[{k = 10}, Sum[N[MangoldtLambda[x], 5], {k, 0, x}]],
      {x, 0, 10}]]


      Accumulate doesn't work either:



      TableForm[Table[Accumulate[N[MangoldtLambda[x], 5]], {x, 0, 10}]]


      Clearly I'm suffering from a failure of imagination, but I'd appreciate help.










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      This should be easy, but for some reason I'm struggling. The Chebyshev psi function is given as the sum from 0 to x of the von Mangoldt function MangoldtLambda[x]. I want to tabulate it. Ideally, I'd like to express the function using Sum, but I can't find the right form. This doesn't work:



      TableForm[
      Table[With[{k = 10}, Sum[N[MangoldtLambda[x], 5], {x, 0, k}]],
      {x, 0, 10}]]


      This produces a series that makes no sense at all:



      TableForm[
      Table[With[{k = 10}, Sum[N[MangoldtLambda[x], 5], {k, 0, x}]],
      {x, 0, 10}]]


      Accumulate doesn't work either:



      TableForm[Table[Accumulate[N[MangoldtLambda[x], 5]], {x, 0, 10}]]


      Clearly I'm suffering from a failure of imagination, but I'd appreciate help.







      functions table summation






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 10 hours ago









      Richard Burke-WardRichard Burke-Ward

      5769




      5769






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          There seems to be a duplicate use of the symbol x in your formulas.



          ChebyshevPsi[x_] := Sum[MangoldtLambda[y], {y, x}]
          Table[ChebyshevPsi[x], {x, 10}]



          {0, Log[2], Log[2] + Log[3], 2 Log[2] + Log[3],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5], 2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7]}




          You can also directly construct a list of these with Accumulate:



          Accumulate@Array[MangoldtLambda, 10]



          {0, Log[2], Log[2] + Log[3], 2 Log[2] + Log[3],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5], 2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7]}




          Plot the deviation of the Chebyshev $psi$ function from $x$:



          ListLinePlot[MapIndexed[{#2[[1]], #1 - #2[[1]]} &, 
          Accumulate@Array[MangoldtLambda, 1000]], Frame -> True,
          FrameLabel -> {x, ψ[x] - x}]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'll tick this when it lets me! Appreciated.
            $endgroup$
            – Richard Burke-Ward
            10 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "387"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192584%2ftable-of-chebyshev-psi-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5












          $begingroup$

          There seems to be a duplicate use of the symbol x in your formulas.



          ChebyshevPsi[x_] := Sum[MangoldtLambda[y], {y, x}]
          Table[ChebyshevPsi[x], {x, 10}]



          {0, Log[2], Log[2] + Log[3], 2 Log[2] + Log[3],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5], 2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7]}




          You can also directly construct a list of these with Accumulate:



          Accumulate@Array[MangoldtLambda, 10]



          {0, Log[2], Log[2] + Log[3], 2 Log[2] + Log[3],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5], 2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7]}




          Plot the deviation of the Chebyshev $psi$ function from $x$:



          ListLinePlot[MapIndexed[{#2[[1]], #1 - #2[[1]]} &, 
          Accumulate@Array[MangoldtLambda, 1000]], Frame -> True,
          FrameLabel -> {x, ψ[x] - x}]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'll tick this when it lets me! Appreciated.
            $endgroup$
            – Richard Burke-Ward
            10 hours ago
















          5












          $begingroup$

          There seems to be a duplicate use of the symbol x in your formulas.



          ChebyshevPsi[x_] := Sum[MangoldtLambda[y], {y, x}]
          Table[ChebyshevPsi[x], {x, 10}]



          {0, Log[2], Log[2] + Log[3], 2 Log[2] + Log[3],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5], 2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7]}




          You can also directly construct a list of these with Accumulate:



          Accumulate@Array[MangoldtLambda, 10]



          {0, Log[2], Log[2] + Log[3], 2 Log[2] + Log[3],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5], 2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7]}




          Plot the deviation of the Chebyshev $psi$ function from $x$:



          ListLinePlot[MapIndexed[{#2[[1]], #1 - #2[[1]]} &, 
          Accumulate@Array[MangoldtLambda, 1000]], Frame -> True,
          FrameLabel -> {x, ψ[x] - x}]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'll tick this when it lets me! Appreciated.
            $endgroup$
            – Richard Burke-Ward
            10 hours ago














          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          There seems to be a duplicate use of the symbol x in your formulas.



          ChebyshevPsi[x_] := Sum[MangoldtLambda[y], {y, x}]
          Table[ChebyshevPsi[x], {x, 10}]



          {0, Log[2], Log[2] + Log[3], 2 Log[2] + Log[3],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5], 2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7]}




          You can also directly construct a list of these with Accumulate:



          Accumulate@Array[MangoldtLambda, 10]



          {0, Log[2], Log[2] + Log[3], 2 Log[2] + Log[3],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5], 2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7]}




          Plot the deviation of the Chebyshev $psi$ function from $x$:



          ListLinePlot[MapIndexed[{#2[[1]], #1 - #2[[1]]} &, 
          Accumulate@Array[MangoldtLambda, 1000]], Frame -> True,
          FrameLabel -> {x, ψ[x] - x}]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          There seems to be a duplicate use of the symbol x in your formulas.



          ChebyshevPsi[x_] := Sum[MangoldtLambda[y], {y, x}]
          Table[ChebyshevPsi[x], {x, 10}]



          {0, Log[2], Log[2] + Log[3], 2 Log[2] + Log[3],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5], 2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7]}




          You can also directly construct a list of these with Accumulate:



          Accumulate@Array[MangoldtLambda, 10]



          {0, Log[2], Log[2] + Log[3], 2 Log[2] + Log[3],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5], 2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5],
          2 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7],
          3 Log[2] + 2 Log[3] + Log[5] + Log[7]}




          Plot the deviation of the Chebyshev $psi$ function from $x$:



          ListLinePlot[MapIndexed[{#2[[1]], #1 - #2[[1]]} &, 
          Accumulate@Array[MangoldtLambda, 1000]], Frame -> True,
          FrameLabel -> {x, ψ[x] - x}]


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 16 mins ago

























          answered 10 hours ago









          RomanRoman

          2,594717




          2,594717












          • $begingroup$
            I'll tick this when it lets me! Appreciated.
            $endgroup$
            – Richard Burke-Ward
            10 hours ago


















          • $begingroup$
            I'll tick this when it lets me! Appreciated.
            $endgroup$
            – Richard Burke-Ward
            10 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          I'll tick this when it lets me! Appreciated.
          $endgroup$
          – Richard Burke-Ward
          10 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          I'll tick this when it lets me! Appreciated.
          $endgroup$
          – Richard Burke-Ward
          10 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192584%2ftable-of-chebyshev-psi-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...

          Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Mirandela Referências Menu de...

          looking for continuous Screen Capture for retroactivly reproducing errors, timeback machineRolling desktop...