Co-worker sabotaging/undoing my work [on hold]2019 Community Moderator ElectionHow to deal with coworker...

Crack the bank account's password!

Lightning Data Table inline edit

Can we "borrow" our answers to populate our own websites?

Stuck on a Geometry Puzzle

A question about partitioning positivie integers into finitely many arithmetic progresions

Book where a space ship journeys to the center of the galaxy to find all the stars had gone supernova

Need help with a circuit diagram where the motor does not seem to have any connection to ground. Error with diagram? Or am i missing something?

Is there a verb that means to inject with poison?

Do authors have to be politically correct in article-writing?

Why do neural networks need so many examples to perform?

How much light is too much?

How vim overwrites readonly mode?

Are the positive and negative planes inner or outer planes in the Great Wheel cosmology model?

What to do with threats of blacklisting?

"Starve to death" Vs. "Starve to the point of death"

Is there a way to not have to poll the UART of an AVR?

Translation needed for 130 years old church document

Why is 'diphthong' pronounced the way it is?

How to create a label containing values from different layers in QGIS

How to not let the Identify spell spoil everything?

Single-row INSERT...SELECT much slower than separate SELECT

Sitecore 9.1 Installation - Skip to particular step

What natural barriers could help when running away from a lightning elemental?

Renting a 2CV in France



Co-worker sabotaging/undoing my work [on hold]



2019 Community Moderator ElectionHow to deal with coworker undoing my (dev) commitHow can I convince my boss my time is more useful than a less experienced worker's time?How can I convince management that I need guidance and ask for a mentor?How to deal with coworker undoing my (dev) commitDealing with an unhelpful senior developer, how to?New software engineer not invited to user experience meeting. Should I be worried?While evaluating a person for a role, they seemed competent, but were unaware of one of the most popular tools in the field. Is that a red flag?How to help senior developer who is beyond helpingHow to work with a senior colleague that you have bad chemistry with?How to communicate co-worker sharing company code on GitHubAm I overly concerned about a newly hired Senior Developer with low performance?












25















Context:



I just got hired as a software developer in a team which has freshly transitioned from networking to development. Before me they hired another developer a year ago who has been since then given a senior role. He is the only other developer by background in that team. This senior developer and I have graduated from the same college and program as well, and this is also our both first job, the only difference being he graduated from college before me, being older than me. I am saying this to explain how much of a difference he and I have in professional experience.



Our manager is not technical, and therefore he is one of those "I care about how much money did it save the company."



Problem:



Because of him being the only developer in the team for more than a year, no one challenged his opinions and ideas on how processes should work. When I joined the team, I saw a team not using Git/GitHub correctly or straight up not using it, no documentation, pushing code directly to production boxes, no collaboration, and manual if some testing. (Things are not that bad. The team is learning, and they realized they aren't following the best practices.)



When I joined, as in any other team, I started putting my ideas forward, but I am always met with a condescending response ("Do you even know insert given topic") by this senior developer. The rest of the team and manager just side with the senior. When I asked them why, the conversation went somewhat like this:



Me: Why do you think this is okay?



Team & manager: He is senior and he knows more.



Me: Why do you think he knows more?



Team & manager: Dude, he uses Linux as his development environment, and he knows a lot.



(That Linux comment actually happened.)



So, I decided to stop getting myself insulted and just do my own thing until maybe more developers are hired and/or we get a technical manager. However, recently I was told to collaborate with this senior on a project, and as usual he denied my ideas...which was okay. I decided to play by his rules (not worth my time) until I recently saw my branches and commits being deleted because he had something else in his plan, which was not communicated to anyone.



I am still on probation and don't want to cause a drama, but it's getting hard not to.










share|improve this question









New contributor




RandomDevMan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by gnat, solarflare, OldPadawan, Jenny D, JimmyB 4 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions require a goal that we can address. Rather than explaining the difficulties of your situation, explain what you want to do to make it better. For more information, see this meta post." – gnat, OldPadawan, Jenny D, JimmyB

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 35





    How do you become a senior developer with 1 year of experience? That alone sounds like a red flag.

    – Joe W
    19 hours ago






  • 18





    You are catching close votes. I am inclined to agree with them. What is your goal? Can you state it clearly? Otherwise this is just a rant.

    – bruglesco
    17 hours ago






  • 6





    The answers you have so far are speculative; please formulate a direct question. It will make it just a bit more clear. :) I'll also add a little note here that you shouldn't need the manager to be technical to understand that you can contribute new ideas the senior lead hasn't; that strikes me as somewhat odd.

    – person27
    14 hours ago








  • 1





    See similar question - I think the advice is also quite relevant: workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/40352/…

    – ForOhFor
    11 hours ago






  • 7





    Not really an answer, but a relevant footnote: "sabotaging" implies intent to harm you (professionally). While I agree with the majority here that the senior's behavior is unacceptable; I strongly urge you not to call it sabotage when you talk to your employer. This suggests that you're taking it personally and elevates it from a professional conflict to a personal one; which can detract from your professional argument.

    – Flater
    10 hours ago
















25















Context:



I just got hired as a software developer in a team which has freshly transitioned from networking to development. Before me they hired another developer a year ago who has been since then given a senior role. He is the only other developer by background in that team. This senior developer and I have graduated from the same college and program as well, and this is also our both first job, the only difference being he graduated from college before me, being older than me. I am saying this to explain how much of a difference he and I have in professional experience.



Our manager is not technical, and therefore he is one of those "I care about how much money did it save the company."



Problem:



Because of him being the only developer in the team for more than a year, no one challenged his opinions and ideas on how processes should work. When I joined the team, I saw a team not using Git/GitHub correctly or straight up not using it, no documentation, pushing code directly to production boxes, no collaboration, and manual if some testing. (Things are not that bad. The team is learning, and they realized they aren't following the best practices.)



When I joined, as in any other team, I started putting my ideas forward, but I am always met with a condescending response ("Do you even know insert given topic") by this senior developer. The rest of the team and manager just side with the senior. When I asked them why, the conversation went somewhat like this:



Me: Why do you think this is okay?



Team & manager: He is senior and he knows more.



Me: Why do you think he knows more?



Team & manager: Dude, he uses Linux as his development environment, and he knows a lot.



(That Linux comment actually happened.)



So, I decided to stop getting myself insulted and just do my own thing until maybe more developers are hired and/or we get a technical manager. However, recently I was told to collaborate with this senior on a project, and as usual he denied my ideas...which was okay. I decided to play by his rules (not worth my time) until I recently saw my branches and commits being deleted because he had something else in his plan, which was not communicated to anyone.



I am still on probation and don't want to cause a drama, but it's getting hard not to.










share|improve this question









New contributor




RandomDevMan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by gnat, solarflare, OldPadawan, Jenny D, JimmyB 4 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions require a goal that we can address. Rather than explaining the difficulties of your situation, explain what you want to do to make it better. For more information, see this meta post." – gnat, OldPadawan, Jenny D, JimmyB

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 35





    How do you become a senior developer with 1 year of experience? That alone sounds like a red flag.

    – Joe W
    19 hours ago






  • 18





    You are catching close votes. I am inclined to agree with them. What is your goal? Can you state it clearly? Otherwise this is just a rant.

    – bruglesco
    17 hours ago






  • 6





    The answers you have so far are speculative; please formulate a direct question. It will make it just a bit more clear. :) I'll also add a little note here that you shouldn't need the manager to be technical to understand that you can contribute new ideas the senior lead hasn't; that strikes me as somewhat odd.

    – person27
    14 hours ago








  • 1





    See similar question - I think the advice is also quite relevant: workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/40352/…

    – ForOhFor
    11 hours ago






  • 7





    Not really an answer, but a relevant footnote: "sabotaging" implies intent to harm you (professionally). While I agree with the majority here that the senior's behavior is unacceptable; I strongly urge you not to call it sabotage when you talk to your employer. This suggests that you're taking it personally and elevates it from a professional conflict to a personal one; which can detract from your professional argument.

    – Flater
    10 hours ago














25












25








25


2






Context:



I just got hired as a software developer in a team which has freshly transitioned from networking to development. Before me they hired another developer a year ago who has been since then given a senior role. He is the only other developer by background in that team. This senior developer and I have graduated from the same college and program as well, and this is also our both first job, the only difference being he graduated from college before me, being older than me. I am saying this to explain how much of a difference he and I have in professional experience.



Our manager is not technical, and therefore he is one of those "I care about how much money did it save the company."



Problem:



Because of him being the only developer in the team for more than a year, no one challenged his opinions and ideas on how processes should work. When I joined the team, I saw a team not using Git/GitHub correctly or straight up not using it, no documentation, pushing code directly to production boxes, no collaboration, and manual if some testing. (Things are not that bad. The team is learning, and they realized they aren't following the best practices.)



When I joined, as in any other team, I started putting my ideas forward, but I am always met with a condescending response ("Do you even know insert given topic") by this senior developer. The rest of the team and manager just side with the senior. When I asked them why, the conversation went somewhat like this:



Me: Why do you think this is okay?



Team & manager: He is senior and he knows more.



Me: Why do you think he knows more?



Team & manager: Dude, he uses Linux as his development environment, and he knows a lot.



(That Linux comment actually happened.)



So, I decided to stop getting myself insulted and just do my own thing until maybe more developers are hired and/or we get a technical manager. However, recently I was told to collaborate with this senior on a project, and as usual he denied my ideas...which was okay. I decided to play by his rules (not worth my time) until I recently saw my branches and commits being deleted because he had something else in his plan, which was not communicated to anyone.



I am still on probation and don't want to cause a drama, but it's getting hard not to.










share|improve this question









New contributor




RandomDevMan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Context:



I just got hired as a software developer in a team which has freshly transitioned from networking to development. Before me they hired another developer a year ago who has been since then given a senior role. He is the only other developer by background in that team. This senior developer and I have graduated from the same college and program as well, and this is also our both first job, the only difference being he graduated from college before me, being older than me. I am saying this to explain how much of a difference he and I have in professional experience.



Our manager is not technical, and therefore he is one of those "I care about how much money did it save the company."



Problem:



Because of him being the only developer in the team for more than a year, no one challenged his opinions and ideas on how processes should work. When I joined the team, I saw a team not using Git/GitHub correctly or straight up not using it, no documentation, pushing code directly to production boxes, no collaboration, and manual if some testing. (Things are not that bad. The team is learning, and they realized they aren't following the best practices.)



When I joined, as in any other team, I started putting my ideas forward, but I am always met with a condescending response ("Do you even know insert given topic") by this senior developer. The rest of the team and manager just side with the senior. When I asked them why, the conversation went somewhat like this:



Me: Why do you think this is okay?



Team & manager: He is senior and he knows more.



Me: Why do you think he knows more?



Team & manager: Dude, he uses Linux as his development environment, and he knows a lot.



(That Linux comment actually happened.)



So, I decided to stop getting myself insulted and just do my own thing until maybe more developers are hired and/or we get a technical manager. However, recently I was told to collaborate with this senior on a project, and as usual he denied my ideas...which was okay. I decided to play by his rules (not worth my time) until I recently saw my branches and commits being deleted because he had something else in his plan, which was not communicated to anyone.



I am still on probation and don't want to cause a drama, but it's getting hard not to.







software-industry software-development






share|improve this question









New contributor




RandomDevMan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




RandomDevMan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









yoozer8

4,15743056




4,15743056






New contributor




RandomDevMan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 22 hours ago









RandomDevManRandomDevMan

13923




13923




New contributor




RandomDevMan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





RandomDevMan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






RandomDevMan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as off-topic by gnat, solarflare, OldPadawan, Jenny D, JimmyB 4 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions require a goal that we can address. Rather than explaining the difficulties of your situation, explain what you want to do to make it better. For more information, see this meta post." – gnat, OldPadawan, Jenny D, JimmyB

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by gnat, solarflare, OldPadawan, Jenny D, JimmyB 4 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions require a goal that we can address. Rather than explaining the difficulties of your situation, explain what you want to do to make it better. For more information, see this meta post." – gnat, OldPadawan, Jenny D, JimmyB

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 35





    How do you become a senior developer with 1 year of experience? That alone sounds like a red flag.

    – Joe W
    19 hours ago






  • 18





    You are catching close votes. I am inclined to agree with them. What is your goal? Can you state it clearly? Otherwise this is just a rant.

    – bruglesco
    17 hours ago






  • 6





    The answers you have so far are speculative; please formulate a direct question. It will make it just a bit more clear. :) I'll also add a little note here that you shouldn't need the manager to be technical to understand that you can contribute new ideas the senior lead hasn't; that strikes me as somewhat odd.

    – person27
    14 hours ago








  • 1





    See similar question - I think the advice is also quite relevant: workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/40352/…

    – ForOhFor
    11 hours ago






  • 7





    Not really an answer, but a relevant footnote: "sabotaging" implies intent to harm you (professionally). While I agree with the majority here that the senior's behavior is unacceptable; I strongly urge you not to call it sabotage when you talk to your employer. This suggests that you're taking it personally and elevates it from a professional conflict to a personal one; which can detract from your professional argument.

    – Flater
    10 hours ago














  • 35





    How do you become a senior developer with 1 year of experience? That alone sounds like a red flag.

    – Joe W
    19 hours ago






  • 18





    You are catching close votes. I am inclined to agree with them. What is your goal? Can you state it clearly? Otherwise this is just a rant.

    – bruglesco
    17 hours ago






  • 6





    The answers you have so far are speculative; please formulate a direct question. It will make it just a bit more clear. :) I'll also add a little note here that you shouldn't need the manager to be technical to understand that you can contribute new ideas the senior lead hasn't; that strikes me as somewhat odd.

    – person27
    14 hours ago








  • 1





    See similar question - I think the advice is also quite relevant: workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/40352/…

    – ForOhFor
    11 hours ago






  • 7





    Not really an answer, but a relevant footnote: "sabotaging" implies intent to harm you (professionally). While I agree with the majority here that the senior's behavior is unacceptable; I strongly urge you not to call it sabotage when you talk to your employer. This suggests that you're taking it personally and elevates it from a professional conflict to a personal one; which can detract from your professional argument.

    – Flater
    10 hours ago








35




35





How do you become a senior developer with 1 year of experience? That alone sounds like a red flag.

– Joe W
19 hours ago





How do you become a senior developer with 1 year of experience? That alone sounds like a red flag.

– Joe W
19 hours ago




18




18





You are catching close votes. I am inclined to agree with them. What is your goal? Can you state it clearly? Otherwise this is just a rant.

– bruglesco
17 hours ago





You are catching close votes. I am inclined to agree with them. What is your goal? Can you state it clearly? Otherwise this is just a rant.

– bruglesco
17 hours ago




6




6





The answers you have so far are speculative; please formulate a direct question. It will make it just a bit more clear. :) I'll also add a little note here that you shouldn't need the manager to be technical to understand that you can contribute new ideas the senior lead hasn't; that strikes me as somewhat odd.

– person27
14 hours ago







The answers you have so far are speculative; please formulate a direct question. It will make it just a bit more clear. :) I'll also add a little note here that you shouldn't need the manager to be technical to understand that you can contribute new ideas the senior lead hasn't; that strikes me as somewhat odd.

– person27
14 hours ago






1




1





See similar question - I think the advice is also quite relevant: workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/40352/…

– ForOhFor
11 hours ago





See similar question - I think the advice is also quite relevant: workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/40352/…

– ForOhFor
11 hours ago




7




7





Not really an answer, but a relevant footnote: "sabotaging" implies intent to harm you (professionally). While I agree with the majority here that the senior's behavior is unacceptable; I strongly urge you not to call it sabotage when you talk to your employer. This suggests that you're taking it personally and elevates it from a professional conflict to a personal one; which can detract from your professional argument.

– Flater
10 hours ago





Not really an answer, but a relevant footnote: "sabotaging" implies intent to harm you (professionally). While I agree with the majority here that the senior's behavior is unacceptable; I strongly urge you not to call it sabotage when you talk to your employer. This suggests that you're taking it personally and elevates it from a professional conflict to a personal one; which can detract from your professional argument.

– Flater
10 hours ago










9 Answers
9






active

oldest

votes


















76














There was a time when I would have said "Stick it out, give things a chance."



That was then and this is now.



I've been where you are. What the "senior" did is unacceptable. Pulling your commits is marginally justifiable, if he IMMEDIATELY issues his design plan document. Deleting your (presumably private) branches is not.



Get out of there. As soon as possible.






share|improve this answer



















  • 18





    The way that "senior" is behaving made me want to write the same thing about getting out. I worked with one guy and it was an absolute dream - we discussed, put forward ideas : some of mine got accepted, some weren't... but *all were looked at as to how they "fit" and how they worked towards the future... Plus 1 from me, said it better than I could.

    – Solar Mike
    22 hours ago






  • 4





    He has 100% trust from everybody, and your current level is apparently quite low, even less than the benefit of the doubt. . Also doesn't sound like he's open to ideas that are not his own, too the point of how code style stuff is done. You have everything against you. Get out.

    – Fabio
    12 hours ago



















12














You made the mistake so many make.



You came straight from school to your first job and took it upon yourself to change how the company works.



Nobody cares if your suggestions are good or not, they just see a still green behind the ears graduate who thinks he knows better than everyone before him.



Of course you'll be met with resistance and looked down upon.



So that was why you're in the situation you're in right now.



Your senior either understood you know more than him and views you as a danger to his position or he thinks you're an immature, know it all hack who can't write correct code.



You have two options:



Confront or submit.



If you confront ask why your work was deleted and escalate to superiors if you can prove it was replaced by inferior code.



Be prepared for backlash up to the point that you want to or are forced to look for a new job.



If you submit, just do your tasks and bite your tongue if you have an idea how to optimize the company.



It's not your place until asked to do so, given a position with that responsibility or have your own company that you can run exactly the way you want it to...






share|improve this answer





















  • 41





    Horrible advice. Your job, as a developer, is to write code that solves the company's problems and to help create and support procedures to enable that. How much experience you have doesn't change things- if their practices are bad, you should try to improve them. Now you should definitely be polite, choose your battles, and listen to reasons you may be wrong. But ignore anyone who says you should shut up and deal, they're the people who cause these kinds of messes.

    – Gabe Sechan
    16 hours ago






  • 18





    This is a terrible answer. Trying to change outdated and misguided processes is part of the job description. Submitting and conforming to existing bad process is a detriment to both the company and the OP's career.

    – linksassin
    14 hours ago






  • 5





    "New blood" is often a benefit companies relish, as it gives an outsiders opinion on how things can be improved. When I've worked with new teams, they usually have asked to know if I see any blatant issues with their processes. I will agree that if it's not asked, there is tact required, but to say that OP should keep their mouth shut is just wrong.

    – David
    13 hours ago






  • 4





    I heard a story where the Army had a large transport stuck in front of a bridge... The RSM was looking at it with no solution when a 12 year old boy suggested letting the tires down... Age or experience does not always bring the solution...

    – Solar Mike
    13 hours ago






  • 3





    @GabeSechan I gave 2 options.But OP is hired to write code according to assigned tasks and feature requests.NOT to manage the company,change the pipeline or lead the team!Companies have their processes in place for reasons,even if it's just convenience.They worked for years.Someone coming in and unsolicitedely assuming to know better,changing everything during a project is foolish at best, has delusions of grandeur at worst!If asked.Fine say your piece and accept decisions,even if they don't listen but OP had contempt in his tone about the company and the teams processes.INACCEPTABLE!

    – DigitalBlade969
    11 hours ago



















8














Being a new member of a team, especially being fresh out of college, makes it difficult for your voice to be heard. This is something I have struggled with and, even as a senior developer, still struggle with.



I have worked as small start ups, medium sized companies, and Fortune 500 companies. One thing I will tell you right now is that the larger and older a company is, the more resistant to change they will be.



Right now I'm a senior engineer at a large enterprise (I won't say which one) and trying to get anything done is like pulling teeth. When I signed up they said I'd be working on their new platform, which no one told me was also five years old. The age of the platform would have been fine had they kept it up to date, but because they made poor technology decisions and had a bunch of developers who generally had no idea how the modern world of software worked, they created this massive junk yard of horrible code that is next to impossible to maintain.



One of the main reasons they hired me was because I've been known to shake things up, modernize, and get things done, which is what, during the interview, they said they wanted.



Why am I saying all this? Basically I'm using it as a teaching point. Making any changes to existing processes or technologies in an environment where those things didn't exist is a constant uphill battle. Eventually, I was able to start to get some changes implemented and I've kept up the momentum and will eventually be pioneering the next generation of their software. Here's how I got there:




  1. You have to prove yourself to the team. Make sure that your team members and managers see you as a useful and productive member of the team. This will help them build trust that you know what you're talking about.


  2. Find some concrete examples of things that you see that are wrong and could be done better. Investigate these things and gather as many metrics as you can. Business people and managers are easy to convince when you use easy-to-understand graphs and numbers that relate to savings time and money.


  3. Getting other team members on board will go a long way to helping your cause. You can't do this alone, so try to convince your colleagues because the more buy-in you have from them the easier it will be.


  4. Don't try to change everything overnight. It won't happen, so make a bunch of small changes in the right direction and keep up the momentum and it will start like an avalanche.



Good luck to you!






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Shadow1349 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




























    2














    Long term advice: if you decide to stay in the job then change will only happen in proportion to the amount the team respects you.



    Short term advice: pick your battles and try to get other people to fight them for you. If you do this successfully you will build respect. You may have squandered a lot of respect by not doing this successfully.



    Some rules of thumb for picking your battles:




    1. Anything adversarial should go directly through your boss. Do not directly criticise or complain about colleagues in front of other colleagues. Your boss is the the person who directly controls your senior colleague so speaking to anyone else about adversarial issues is pointless (and potentially dangerous, if they are friends with senior).

    2. You can suggest improvements to anyone but try to do this in a non-confrontational manner. Be prepared to drop suggestions if people aren't buying it. You also want to try and suggest the same improvement as few times as possible. For example, it is ok to say "we could use github for this" every time there is a new project/problem but it is not ok to tell Dave Anonymous "github would be really good for your project" then proceed to tell Dave's colleagues how good github would be for Dave after he has already indicated that he isn't interested. Dave will be annoyed and maybe never respect you again. The trick here is working out the right time/situation/person to put forward your suggestion and restricting yourself to one time/situation/person per idea.


    Ideally you don't want to spend any time criticising or fighting with your "senior" colleague but there are some times when this is unavoidable. e.g. if your colleague is deleting your work. In all of these cases you need to go to your boss with a clear outline of the problem and what you would like to change.



    In the case of deleted work you could say "X is deleting my work without talking to me. Please could we have a meeting with you, me and X to agree on some kind of framework for version control (replace version control with whatever you think would help). I'm sorry to bring this to you but I haven't been able to find a solution with person X." Do make sure that you have already tried speaking to X before your boss. Also make sure that you have a tangible example of work deleted. Perhaps you don't have the code itself (since it was deleted) but you should be able to describe how long the code was and what it did.






    share|improve this answer































      2














      Do the job the best way you can regardless of circumstance



      You were hired for your skills and expertise. The fact that a "senior" engineer doesn't recognise that isn't your fault.



      The way I see it you have three options:



      Option 1: Leave



      This situation raises numerous red flags. A small development team entirely controlled by one inexperienced leader, no consultation on process, poor standards and quality control, etc.. You could well be better off elsewhere.



      Only choose this option if you feel you can't make it work otherwise. Leaving during probation can look bad on a resume. You will need to explain it and see yourself well in all future interviews.



      Option 2: Submit



      Lower your own standards to fit in with the team. You're new; don't rock the boat. He does have another year's experience compared to you. Clearly he knows more; just sit there and learn from the master of all things programming.



      Don't choose this option. You're better than that.



      Option 3: Try to improve the situation



      This is what you were hired to do. Do the job to the best of your ability despite adversity. You have said that direct confrontation didn't work and your concerns were dismissed. You need evidence to support yourself. Some things you could try:



      Ask to document the current development process.



      "I'm having trouble getting my head around our development process. If you explain it to me I'll document it for the next new starter." There is no reasonable cause to reject such a request. Best case, you will discover the process isn't as bad as you thought. More likely case is you can use this to identify special deficiencies or problems you can improve. Worst case, your request gets rejected, see Option 1.



      Present Solutions, not Problems



      Write up formal documentation for what process you want to change. Make notes of specific problems the team has had that this process with resolve in the future. You know an off-hand suggestion to change will be dismissed, and don't give them that chance. Present the team leader and management with a well researched and documented approach to solve problems. Now you aren't the new kid causing issues; you are the solution to problems they already had.



      Be polite and don't start fights



      You need to be the bigger person in this situation. Show yourself as rational and willing to listen. If an idea gets shot down, accept it and move on. When the problems inevitably reoccur you can bring it up then. You don't want to be seen as a troublemaker; earn their represent through your behaviour even if you can't change their minds.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      linksassin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      • OP wasn't hired to "improve the situation".That's a misguided sentiment.OP is there to WRITE CODE.Management and leads are the ones who improve anyhting as they are there for that reason (among other things) and actually have the AUTHORITY to do so! Code monkeys take the banana and do what they're told. That doesn't mean they can't voice their concerns, it just means they have to accept the pecking order and behave according to managements decisions,even if they think, it's wrong and they know better...this is something young people understand the least

        – DigitalBlade969
        11 hours ago













      • @DigitalBlade969 "OP is there to WRITE CODE", "Code monkeys take the banana and do what they're told", "have to accept the pecking order and behave according to managements decisions,even if they think, it's wrong and they know better" - > No they really don't. "Code monkeys" even. Show some respect, or gain some. Either, way, don't care. Flagged as rude. Should know better seeing your time here.

        – rkeet
        8 hours ago











      • @rkeet hahahaha rude?! Code monkey is a widely, even lovingly used term, not an insult. Gain some perspective. Also, YES they do have to follow instructions of superiors.In what phantasy land do you live? That's how the real world works, especially businesses, where other peoples' money and livelyhoods are at stake! And it is NOT within a junior programmers responsibilities to change the pipeline or lead the team unless instructed or asked to do so.

        – DigitalBlade969
        7 hours ago













      • I think leaving during probation period is still better explainable with "it was not a good fit" than leaving shortly after probation. The probation period isn't only there to access the employee, but also the employer. (In case OP wants out ASAP). This may be culture dependend though.

        – Rhayene
        7 hours ago



















      1















      "Because of him being the only developer in the team for more than a year, no one challenged his opinions and ideas on how processes should work."




      That is exactly what happened to me at work, and that's happened not only in programming, but also in every field work. (I'm not programming, but I have the same situation as yours.)



      I don't say my senior (same situation with your senior) is bad at all. Sometimes I give some advice/opinion/critic, but she rejected it, she won't discuss it and find out the best way to solve the problem.



      But my condition is worse than you. Basically I know, I already lose the war before it even started.



      Well, if you are looking for the answer, maybe it only has two options:




      1. Brace yourself, and accept the condition, considering if you need (have) to keep your job. I believe karma is real.


      2. You could resign and find another job. I mean, why would you live in a place that makes you unhappy, right?



      And sometimes, the truth will reveal itself. I mean it's better for you to focus on yourself, use your energy and your time to develop your ability and skills rather than think about them, ignore close-minded people like your senior (also mine).



      And the meaning of "the truth will reveal itself" - who knows, five years later your senior will be stuck at a low-grade job and you got into a higher-level job at a different company. Who knows, right?






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      RPP is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




























        1















        "which was not communicated to anyone"





        • anyone, or you?


        He's not gained this trust because he hides what he's doing, or because he doesn't deliver. I would suggest that it's just you he doesn't feel the need to explain things to YOU - which leaves you in the dark in multiple different ways.



        IF you plan to stay there, then the solution is to improve communication in your team; find out why he thinks you were so wrong, and explain to him that unless he communicates plans with you, you will never be productive.



        It sounds like he's new to managing teams and projects; but is a much trusted member of the company. Attempting to push him down will only backfire, and you never know maybe his reasoning will make sense.






        share|improve this answer































          0














          Do you currently have the great luck of working in an industry where there's plenty of work.



          Right now you should be working for a company where either a) you love your job or b) you are learning every single day (which will help with a) in the long term). I can see no reason whatsoever for you to remain at this job.






          share|improve this answer































            -1














            Often times the best programmers are the ones with the humility to admit when they're wrong and that don't need to hide behind layers of bullshit to cover up for not knowing something






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            robertmain is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.
















            • 6





              I don't disagree with the sentiment, but I'm not sure how it can be considered an answer. It would be helpful if you could flesh this out into something that provides an action that can be taken, or other solution to the situation.

              – Booga Roo
              12 hours ago


















            9 Answers
            9






            active

            oldest

            votes








            9 Answers
            9






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            76














            There was a time when I would have said "Stick it out, give things a chance."



            That was then and this is now.



            I've been where you are. What the "senior" did is unacceptable. Pulling your commits is marginally justifiable, if he IMMEDIATELY issues his design plan document. Deleting your (presumably private) branches is not.



            Get out of there. As soon as possible.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 18





              The way that "senior" is behaving made me want to write the same thing about getting out. I worked with one guy and it was an absolute dream - we discussed, put forward ideas : some of mine got accepted, some weren't... but *all were looked at as to how they "fit" and how they worked towards the future... Plus 1 from me, said it better than I could.

              – Solar Mike
              22 hours ago






            • 4





              He has 100% trust from everybody, and your current level is apparently quite low, even less than the benefit of the doubt. . Also doesn't sound like he's open to ideas that are not his own, too the point of how code style stuff is done. You have everything against you. Get out.

              – Fabio
              12 hours ago
















            76














            There was a time when I would have said "Stick it out, give things a chance."



            That was then and this is now.



            I've been where you are. What the "senior" did is unacceptable. Pulling your commits is marginally justifiable, if he IMMEDIATELY issues his design plan document. Deleting your (presumably private) branches is not.



            Get out of there. As soon as possible.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 18





              The way that "senior" is behaving made me want to write the same thing about getting out. I worked with one guy and it was an absolute dream - we discussed, put forward ideas : some of mine got accepted, some weren't... but *all were looked at as to how they "fit" and how they worked towards the future... Plus 1 from me, said it better than I could.

              – Solar Mike
              22 hours ago






            • 4





              He has 100% trust from everybody, and your current level is apparently quite low, even less than the benefit of the doubt. . Also doesn't sound like he's open to ideas that are not his own, too the point of how code style stuff is done. You have everything against you. Get out.

              – Fabio
              12 hours ago














            76












            76








            76







            There was a time when I would have said "Stick it out, give things a chance."



            That was then and this is now.



            I've been where you are. What the "senior" did is unacceptable. Pulling your commits is marginally justifiable, if he IMMEDIATELY issues his design plan document. Deleting your (presumably private) branches is not.



            Get out of there. As soon as possible.






            share|improve this answer













            There was a time when I would have said "Stick it out, give things a chance."



            That was then and this is now.



            I've been where you are. What the "senior" did is unacceptable. Pulling your commits is marginally justifiable, if he IMMEDIATELY issues his design plan document. Deleting your (presumably private) branches is not.



            Get out of there. As soon as possible.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 22 hours ago









            John R. StrohmJohn R. Strohm

            5,99722125




            5,99722125








            • 18





              The way that "senior" is behaving made me want to write the same thing about getting out. I worked with one guy and it was an absolute dream - we discussed, put forward ideas : some of mine got accepted, some weren't... but *all were looked at as to how they "fit" and how they worked towards the future... Plus 1 from me, said it better than I could.

              – Solar Mike
              22 hours ago






            • 4





              He has 100% trust from everybody, and your current level is apparently quite low, even less than the benefit of the doubt. . Also doesn't sound like he's open to ideas that are not his own, too the point of how code style stuff is done. You have everything against you. Get out.

              – Fabio
              12 hours ago














            • 18





              The way that "senior" is behaving made me want to write the same thing about getting out. I worked with one guy and it was an absolute dream - we discussed, put forward ideas : some of mine got accepted, some weren't... but *all were looked at as to how they "fit" and how they worked towards the future... Plus 1 from me, said it better than I could.

              – Solar Mike
              22 hours ago






            • 4





              He has 100% trust from everybody, and your current level is apparently quite low, even less than the benefit of the doubt. . Also doesn't sound like he's open to ideas that are not his own, too the point of how code style stuff is done. You have everything against you. Get out.

              – Fabio
              12 hours ago








            18




            18





            The way that "senior" is behaving made me want to write the same thing about getting out. I worked with one guy and it was an absolute dream - we discussed, put forward ideas : some of mine got accepted, some weren't... but *all were looked at as to how they "fit" and how they worked towards the future... Plus 1 from me, said it better than I could.

            – Solar Mike
            22 hours ago





            The way that "senior" is behaving made me want to write the same thing about getting out. I worked with one guy and it was an absolute dream - we discussed, put forward ideas : some of mine got accepted, some weren't... but *all were looked at as to how they "fit" and how they worked towards the future... Plus 1 from me, said it better than I could.

            – Solar Mike
            22 hours ago




            4




            4





            He has 100% trust from everybody, and your current level is apparently quite low, even less than the benefit of the doubt. . Also doesn't sound like he's open to ideas that are not his own, too the point of how code style stuff is done. You have everything against you. Get out.

            – Fabio
            12 hours ago





            He has 100% trust from everybody, and your current level is apparently quite low, even less than the benefit of the doubt. . Also doesn't sound like he's open to ideas that are not his own, too the point of how code style stuff is done. You have everything against you. Get out.

            – Fabio
            12 hours ago













            12














            You made the mistake so many make.



            You came straight from school to your first job and took it upon yourself to change how the company works.



            Nobody cares if your suggestions are good or not, they just see a still green behind the ears graduate who thinks he knows better than everyone before him.



            Of course you'll be met with resistance and looked down upon.



            So that was why you're in the situation you're in right now.



            Your senior either understood you know more than him and views you as a danger to his position or he thinks you're an immature, know it all hack who can't write correct code.



            You have two options:



            Confront or submit.



            If you confront ask why your work was deleted and escalate to superiors if you can prove it was replaced by inferior code.



            Be prepared for backlash up to the point that you want to or are forced to look for a new job.



            If you submit, just do your tasks and bite your tongue if you have an idea how to optimize the company.



            It's not your place until asked to do so, given a position with that responsibility or have your own company that you can run exactly the way you want it to...






            share|improve this answer





















            • 41





              Horrible advice. Your job, as a developer, is to write code that solves the company's problems and to help create and support procedures to enable that. How much experience you have doesn't change things- if their practices are bad, you should try to improve them. Now you should definitely be polite, choose your battles, and listen to reasons you may be wrong. But ignore anyone who says you should shut up and deal, they're the people who cause these kinds of messes.

              – Gabe Sechan
              16 hours ago






            • 18





              This is a terrible answer. Trying to change outdated and misguided processes is part of the job description. Submitting and conforming to existing bad process is a detriment to both the company and the OP's career.

              – linksassin
              14 hours ago






            • 5





              "New blood" is often a benefit companies relish, as it gives an outsiders opinion on how things can be improved. When I've worked with new teams, they usually have asked to know if I see any blatant issues with their processes. I will agree that if it's not asked, there is tact required, but to say that OP should keep their mouth shut is just wrong.

              – David
              13 hours ago






            • 4





              I heard a story where the Army had a large transport stuck in front of a bridge... The RSM was looking at it with no solution when a 12 year old boy suggested letting the tires down... Age or experience does not always bring the solution...

              – Solar Mike
              13 hours ago






            • 3





              @GabeSechan I gave 2 options.But OP is hired to write code according to assigned tasks and feature requests.NOT to manage the company,change the pipeline or lead the team!Companies have their processes in place for reasons,even if it's just convenience.They worked for years.Someone coming in and unsolicitedely assuming to know better,changing everything during a project is foolish at best, has delusions of grandeur at worst!If asked.Fine say your piece and accept decisions,even if they don't listen but OP had contempt in his tone about the company and the teams processes.INACCEPTABLE!

              – DigitalBlade969
              11 hours ago
















            12














            You made the mistake so many make.



            You came straight from school to your first job and took it upon yourself to change how the company works.



            Nobody cares if your suggestions are good or not, they just see a still green behind the ears graduate who thinks he knows better than everyone before him.



            Of course you'll be met with resistance and looked down upon.



            So that was why you're in the situation you're in right now.



            Your senior either understood you know more than him and views you as a danger to his position or he thinks you're an immature, know it all hack who can't write correct code.



            You have two options:



            Confront or submit.



            If you confront ask why your work was deleted and escalate to superiors if you can prove it was replaced by inferior code.



            Be prepared for backlash up to the point that you want to or are forced to look for a new job.



            If you submit, just do your tasks and bite your tongue if you have an idea how to optimize the company.



            It's not your place until asked to do so, given a position with that responsibility or have your own company that you can run exactly the way you want it to...






            share|improve this answer





















            • 41





              Horrible advice. Your job, as a developer, is to write code that solves the company's problems and to help create and support procedures to enable that. How much experience you have doesn't change things- if their practices are bad, you should try to improve them. Now you should definitely be polite, choose your battles, and listen to reasons you may be wrong. But ignore anyone who says you should shut up and deal, they're the people who cause these kinds of messes.

              – Gabe Sechan
              16 hours ago






            • 18





              This is a terrible answer. Trying to change outdated and misguided processes is part of the job description. Submitting and conforming to existing bad process is a detriment to both the company and the OP's career.

              – linksassin
              14 hours ago






            • 5





              "New blood" is often a benefit companies relish, as it gives an outsiders opinion on how things can be improved. When I've worked with new teams, they usually have asked to know if I see any blatant issues with their processes. I will agree that if it's not asked, there is tact required, but to say that OP should keep their mouth shut is just wrong.

              – David
              13 hours ago






            • 4





              I heard a story where the Army had a large transport stuck in front of a bridge... The RSM was looking at it with no solution when a 12 year old boy suggested letting the tires down... Age or experience does not always bring the solution...

              – Solar Mike
              13 hours ago






            • 3





              @GabeSechan I gave 2 options.But OP is hired to write code according to assigned tasks and feature requests.NOT to manage the company,change the pipeline or lead the team!Companies have their processes in place for reasons,even if it's just convenience.They worked for years.Someone coming in and unsolicitedely assuming to know better,changing everything during a project is foolish at best, has delusions of grandeur at worst!If asked.Fine say your piece and accept decisions,even if they don't listen but OP had contempt in his tone about the company and the teams processes.INACCEPTABLE!

              – DigitalBlade969
              11 hours ago














            12












            12








            12







            You made the mistake so many make.



            You came straight from school to your first job and took it upon yourself to change how the company works.



            Nobody cares if your suggestions are good or not, they just see a still green behind the ears graduate who thinks he knows better than everyone before him.



            Of course you'll be met with resistance and looked down upon.



            So that was why you're in the situation you're in right now.



            Your senior either understood you know more than him and views you as a danger to his position or he thinks you're an immature, know it all hack who can't write correct code.



            You have two options:



            Confront or submit.



            If you confront ask why your work was deleted and escalate to superiors if you can prove it was replaced by inferior code.



            Be prepared for backlash up to the point that you want to or are forced to look for a new job.



            If you submit, just do your tasks and bite your tongue if you have an idea how to optimize the company.



            It's not your place until asked to do so, given a position with that responsibility or have your own company that you can run exactly the way you want it to...






            share|improve this answer















            You made the mistake so many make.



            You came straight from school to your first job and took it upon yourself to change how the company works.



            Nobody cares if your suggestions are good or not, they just see a still green behind the ears graduate who thinks he knows better than everyone before him.



            Of course you'll be met with resistance and looked down upon.



            So that was why you're in the situation you're in right now.



            Your senior either understood you know more than him and views you as a danger to his position or he thinks you're an immature, know it all hack who can't write correct code.



            You have two options:



            Confront or submit.



            If you confront ask why your work was deleted and escalate to superiors if you can prove it was replaced by inferior code.



            Be prepared for backlash up to the point that you want to or are forced to look for a new job.



            If you submit, just do your tasks and bite your tongue if you have an idea how to optimize the company.



            It's not your place until asked to do so, given a position with that responsibility or have your own company that you can run exactly the way you want it to...







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 11 hours ago

























            answered 20 hours ago









            DigitalBlade969DigitalBlade969

            8,2902932




            8,2902932








            • 41





              Horrible advice. Your job, as a developer, is to write code that solves the company's problems and to help create and support procedures to enable that. How much experience you have doesn't change things- if their practices are bad, you should try to improve them. Now you should definitely be polite, choose your battles, and listen to reasons you may be wrong. But ignore anyone who says you should shut up and deal, they're the people who cause these kinds of messes.

              – Gabe Sechan
              16 hours ago






            • 18





              This is a terrible answer. Trying to change outdated and misguided processes is part of the job description. Submitting and conforming to existing bad process is a detriment to both the company and the OP's career.

              – linksassin
              14 hours ago






            • 5





              "New blood" is often a benefit companies relish, as it gives an outsiders opinion on how things can be improved. When I've worked with new teams, they usually have asked to know if I see any blatant issues with their processes. I will agree that if it's not asked, there is tact required, but to say that OP should keep their mouth shut is just wrong.

              – David
              13 hours ago






            • 4





              I heard a story where the Army had a large transport stuck in front of a bridge... The RSM was looking at it with no solution when a 12 year old boy suggested letting the tires down... Age or experience does not always bring the solution...

              – Solar Mike
              13 hours ago






            • 3





              @GabeSechan I gave 2 options.But OP is hired to write code according to assigned tasks and feature requests.NOT to manage the company,change the pipeline or lead the team!Companies have their processes in place for reasons,even if it's just convenience.They worked for years.Someone coming in and unsolicitedely assuming to know better,changing everything during a project is foolish at best, has delusions of grandeur at worst!If asked.Fine say your piece and accept decisions,even if they don't listen but OP had contempt in his tone about the company and the teams processes.INACCEPTABLE!

              – DigitalBlade969
              11 hours ago














            • 41





              Horrible advice. Your job, as a developer, is to write code that solves the company's problems and to help create and support procedures to enable that. How much experience you have doesn't change things- if their practices are bad, you should try to improve them. Now you should definitely be polite, choose your battles, and listen to reasons you may be wrong. But ignore anyone who says you should shut up and deal, they're the people who cause these kinds of messes.

              – Gabe Sechan
              16 hours ago






            • 18





              This is a terrible answer. Trying to change outdated and misguided processes is part of the job description. Submitting and conforming to existing bad process is a detriment to both the company and the OP's career.

              – linksassin
              14 hours ago






            • 5





              "New blood" is often a benefit companies relish, as it gives an outsiders opinion on how things can be improved. When I've worked with new teams, they usually have asked to know if I see any blatant issues with their processes. I will agree that if it's not asked, there is tact required, but to say that OP should keep their mouth shut is just wrong.

              – David
              13 hours ago






            • 4





              I heard a story where the Army had a large transport stuck in front of a bridge... The RSM was looking at it with no solution when a 12 year old boy suggested letting the tires down... Age or experience does not always bring the solution...

              – Solar Mike
              13 hours ago






            • 3





              @GabeSechan I gave 2 options.But OP is hired to write code according to assigned tasks and feature requests.NOT to manage the company,change the pipeline or lead the team!Companies have their processes in place for reasons,even if it's just convenience.They worked for years.Someone coming in and unsolicitedely assuming to know better,changing everything during a project is foolish at best, has delusions of grandeur at worst!If asked.Fine say your piece and accept decisions,even if they don't listen but OP had contempt in his tone about the company and the teams processes.INACCEPTABLE!

              – DigitalBlade969
              11 hours ago








            41




            41





            Horrible advice. Your job, as a developer, is to write code that solves the company's problems and to help create and support procedures to enable that. How much experience you have doesn't change things- if their practices are bad, you should try to improve them. Now you should definitely be polite, choose your battles, and listen to reasons you may be wrong. But ignore anyone who says you should shut up and deal, they're the people who cause these kinds of messes.

            – Gabe Sechan
            16 hours ago





            Horrible advice. Your job, as a developer, is to write code that solves the company's problems and to help create and support procedures to enable that. How much experience you have doesn't change things- if their practices are bad, you should try to improve them. Now you should definitely be polite, choose your battles, and listen to reasons you may be wrong. But ignore anyone who says you should shut up and deal, they're the people who cause these kinds of messes.

            – Gabe Sechan
            16 hours ago




            18




            18





            This is a terrible answer. Trying to change outdated and misguided processes is part of the job description. Submitting and conforming to existing bad process is a detriment to both the company and the OP's career.

            – linksassin
            14 hours ago





            This is a terrible answer. Trying to change outdated and misguided processes is part of the job description. Submitting and conforming to existing bad process is a detriment to both the company and the OP's career.

            – linksassin
            14 hours ago




            5




            5





            "New blood" is often a benefit companies relish, as it gives an outsiders opinion on how things can be improved. When I've worked with new teams, they usually have asked to know if I see any blatant issues with their processes. I will agree that if it's not asked, there is tact required, but to say that OP should keep their mouth shut is just wrong.

            – David
            13 hours ago





            "New blood" is often a benefit companies relish, as it gives an outsiders opinion on how things can be improved. When I've worked with new teams, they usually have asked to know if I see any blatant issues with their processes. I will agree that if it's not asked, there is tact required, but to say that OP should keep their mouth shut is just wrong.

            – David
            13 hours ago




            4




            4





            I heard a story where the Army had a large transport stuck in front of a bridge... The RSM was looking at it with no solution when a 12 year old boy suggested letting the tires down... Age or experience does not always bring the solution...

            – Solar Mike
            13 hours ago





            I heard a story where the Army had a large transport stuck in front of a bridge... The RSM was looking at it with no solution when a 12 year old boy suggested letting the tires down... Age or experience does not always bring the solution...

            – Solar Mike
            13 hours ago




            3




            3





            @GabeSechan I gave 2 options.But OP is hired to write code according to assigned tasks and feature requests.NOT to manage the company,change the pipeline or lead the team!Companies have their processes in place for reasons,even if it's just convenience.They worked for years.Someone coming in and unsolicitedely assuming to know better,changing everything during a project is foolish at best, has delusions of grandeur at worst!If asked.Fine say your piece and accept decisions,even if they don't listen but OP had contempt in his tone about the company and the teams processes.INACCEPTABLE!

            – DigitalBlade969
            11 hours ago





            @GabeSechan I gave 2 options.But OP is hired to write code according to assigned tasks and feature requests.NOT to manage the company,change the pipeline or lead the team!Companies have their processes in place for reasons,even if it's just convenience.They worked for years.Someone coming in and unsolicitedely assuming to know better,changing everything during a project is foolish at best, has delusions of grandeur at worst!If asked.Fine say your piece and accept decisions,even if they don't listen but OP had contempt in his tone about the company and the teams processes.INACCEPTABLE!

            – DigitalBlade969
            11 hours ago











            8














            Being a new member of a team, especially being fresh out of college, makes it difficult for your voice to be heard. This is something I have struggled with and, even as a senior developer, still struggle with.



            I have worked as small start ups, medium sized companies, and Fortune 500 companies. One thing I will tell you right now is that the larger and older a company is, the more resistant to change they will be.



            Right now I'm a senior engineer at a large enterprise (I won't say which one) and trying to get anything done is like pulling teeth. When I signed up they said I'd be working on their new platform, which no one told me was also five years old. The age of the platform would have been fine had they kept it up to date, but because they made poor technology decisions and had a bunch of developers who generally had no idea how the modern world of software worked, they created this massive junk yard of horrible code that is next to impossible to maintain.



            One of the main reasons they hired me was because I've been known to shake things up, modernize, and get things done, which is what, during the interview, they said they wanted.



            Why am I saying all this? Basically I'm using it as a teaching point. Making any changes to existing processes or technologies in an environment where those things didn't exist is a constant uphill battle. Eventually, I was able to start to get some changes implemented and I've kept up the momentum and will eventually be pioneering the next generation of their software. Here's how I got there:




            1. You have to prove yourself to the team. Make sure that your team members and managers see you as a useful and productive member of the team. This will help them build trust that you know what you're talking about.


            2. Find some concrete examples of things that you see that are wrong and could be done better. Investigate these things and gather as many metrics as you can. Business people and managers are easy to convince when you use easy-to-understand graphs and numbers that relate to savings time and money.


            3. Getting other team members on board will go a long way to helping your cause. You can't do this alone, so try to convince your colleagues because the more buy-in you have from them the easier it will be.


            4. Don't try to change everything overnight. It won't happen, so make a bunch of small changes in the right direction and keep up the momentum and it will start like an avalanche.



            Good luck to you!






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Shadow1349 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.

























              8














              Being a new member of a team, especially being fresh out of college, makes it difficult for your voice to be heard. This is something I have struggled with and, even as a senior developer, still struggle with.



              I have worked as small start ups, medium sized companies, and Fortune 500 companies. One thing I will tell you right now is that the larger and older a company is, the more resistant to change they will be.



              Right now I'm a senior engineer at a large enterprise (I won't say which one) and trying to get anything done is like pulling teeth. When I signed up they said I'd be working on their new platform, which no one told me was also five years old. The age of the platform would have been fine had they kept it up to date, but because they made poor technology decisions and had a bunch of developers who generally had no idea how the modern world of software worked, they created this massive junk yard of horrible code that is next to impossible to maintain.



              One of the main reasons they hired me was because I've been known to shake things up, modernize, and get things done, which is what, during the interview, they said they wanted.



              Why am I saying all this? Basically I'm using it as a teaching point. Making any changes to existing processes or technologies in an environment where those things didn't exist is a constant uphill battle. Eventually, I was able to start to get some changes implemented and I've kept up the momentum and will eventually be pioneering the next generation of their software. Here's how I got there:




              1. You have to prove yourself to the team. Make sure that your team members and managers see you as a useful and productive member of the team. This will help them build trust that you know what you're talking about.


              2. Find some concrete examples of things that you see that are wrong and could be done better. Investigate these things and gather as many metrics as you can. Business people and managers are easy to convince when you use easy-to-understand graphs and numbers that relate to savings time and money.


              3. Getting other team members on board will go a long way to helping your cause. You can't do this alone, so try to convince your colleagues because the more buy-in you have from them the easier it will be.


              4. Don't try to change everything overnight. It won't happen, so make a bunch of small changes in the right direction and keep up the momentum and it will start like an avalanche.



              Good luck to you!






              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Shadow1349 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.























                8












                8








                8







                Being a new member of a team, especially being fresh out of college, makes it difficult for your voice to be heard. This is something I have struggled with and, even as a senior developer, still struggle with.



                I have worked as small start ups, medium sized companies, and Fortune 500 companies. One thing I will tell you right now is that the larger and older a company is, the more resistant to change they will be.



                Right now I'm a senior engineer at a large enterprise (I won't say which one) and trying to get anything done is like pulling teeth. When I signed up they said I'd be working on their new platform, which no one told me was also five years old. The age of the platform would have been fine had they kept it up to date, but because they made poor technology decisions and had a bunch of developers who generally had no idea how the modern world of software worked, they created this massive junk yard of horrible code that is next to impossible to maintain.



                One of the main reasons they hired me was because I've been known to shake things up, modernize, and get things done, which is what, during the interview, they said they wanted.



                Why am I saying all this? Basically I'm using it as a teaching point. Making any changes to existing processes or technologies in an environment where those things didn't exist is a constant uphill battle. Eventually, I was able to start to get some changes implemented and I've kept up the momentum and will eventually be pioneering the next generation of their software. Here's how I got there:




                1. You have to prove yourself to the team. Make sure that your team members and managers see you as a useful and productive member of the team. This will help them build trust that you know what you're talking about.


                2. Find some concrete examples of things that you see that are wrong and could be done better. Investigate these things and gather as many metrics as you can. Business people and managers are easy to convince when you use easy-to-understand graphs and numbers that relate to savings time and money.


                3. Getting other team members on board will go a long way to helping your cause. You can't do this alone, so try to convince your colleagues because the more buy-in you have from them the easier it will be.


                4. Don't try to change everything overnight. It won't happen, so make a bunch of small changes in the right direction and keep up the momentum and it will start like an avalanche.



                Good luck to you!






                share|improve this answer










                New contributor




                Shadow1349 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.










                Being a new member of a team, especially being fresh out of college, makes it difficult for your voice to be heard. This is something I have struggled with and, even as a senior developer, still struggle with.



                I have worked as small start ups, medium sized companies, and Fortune 500 companies. One thing I will tell you right now is that the larger and older a company is, the more resistant to change they will be.



                Right now I'm a senior engineer at a large enterprise (I won't say which one) and trying to get anything done is like pulling teeth. When I signed up they said I'd be working on their new platform, which no one told me was also five years old. The age of the platform would have been fine had they kept it up to date, but because they made poor technology decisions and had a bunch of developers who generally had no idea how the modern world of software worked, they created this massive junk yard of horrible code that is next to impossible to maintain.



                One of the main reasons they hired me was because I've been known to shake things up, modernize, and get things done, which is what, during the interview, they said they wanted.



                Why am I saying all this? Basically I'm using it as a teaching point. Making any changes to existing processes or technologies in an environment where those things didn't exist is a constant uphill battle. Eventually, I was able to start to get some changes implemented and I've kept up the momentum and will eventually be pioneering the next generation of their software. Here's how I got there:




                1. You have to prove yourself to the team. Make sure that your team members and managers see you as a useful and productive member of the team. This will help them build trust that you know what you're talking about.


                2. Find some concrete examples of things that you see that are wrong and could be done better. Investigate these things and gather as many metrics as you can. Business people and managers are easy to convince when you use easy-to-understand graphs and numbers that relate to savings time and money.


                3. Getting other team members on board will go a long way to helping your cause. You can't do this alone, so try to convince your colleagues because the more buy-in you have from them the easier it will be.


                4. Don't try to change everything overnight. It won't happen, so make a bunch of small changes in the right direction and keep up the momentum and it will start like an avalanche.



                Good luck to you!







                share|improve this answer










                New contributor




                Shadow1349 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 7 hours ago









                Peter Mortensen

                55547




                55547






                New contributor




                Shadow1349 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                answered 13 hours ago









                Shadow1349Shadow1349

                811




                811




                New contributor




                Shadow1349 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                New contributor





                Shadow1349 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                Shadow1349 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.























                    2














                    Long term advice: if you decide to stay in the job then change will only happen in proportion to the amount the team respects you.



                    Short term advice: pick your battles and try to get other people to fight them for you. If you do this successfully you will build respect. You may have squandered a lot of respect by not doing this successfully.



                    Some rules of thumb for picking your battles:




                    1. Anything adversarial should go directly through your boss. Do not directly criticise or complain about colleagues in front of other colleagues. Your boss is the the person who directly controls your senior colleague so speaking to anyone else about adversarial issues is pointless (and potentially dangerous, if they are friends with senior).

                    2. You can suggest improvements to anyone but try to do this in a non-confrontational manner. Be prepared to drop suggestions if people aren't buying it. You also want to try and suggest the same improvement as few times as possible. For example, it is ok to say "we could use github for this" every time there is a new project/problem but it is not ok to tell Dave Anonymous "github would be really good for your project" then proceed to tell Dave's colleagues how good github would be for Dave after he has already indicated that he isn't interested. Dave will be annoyed and maybe never respect you again. The trick here is working out the right time/situation/person to put forward your suggestion and restricting yourself to one time/situation/person per idea.


                    Ideally you don't want to spend any time criticising or fighting with your "senior" colleague but there are some times when this is unavoidable. e.g. if your colleague is deleting your work. In all of these cases you need to go to your boss with a clear outline of the problem and what you would like to change.



                    In the case of deleted work you could say "X is deleting my work without talking to me. Please could we have a meeting with you, me and X to agree on some kind of framework for version control (replace version control with whatever you think would help). I'm sorry to bring this to you but I haven't been able to find a solution with person X." Do make sure that you have already tried speaking to X before your boss. Also make sure that you have a tangible example of work deleted. Perhaps you don't have the code itself (since it was deleted) but you should be able to describe how long the code was and what it did.






                    share|improve this answer




























                      2














                      Long term advice: if you decide to stay in the job then change will only happen in proportion to the amount the team respects you.



                      Short term advice: pick your battles and try to get other people to fight them for you. If you do this successfully you will build respect. You may have squandered a lot of respect by not doing this successfully.



                      Some rules of thumb for picking your battles:




                      1. Anything adversarial should go directly through your boss. Do not directly criticise or complain about colleagues in front of other colleagues. Your boss is the the person who directly controls your senior colleague so speaking to anyone else about adversarial issues is pointless (and potentially dangerous, if they are friends with senior).

                      2. You can suggest improvements to anyone but try to do this in a non-confrontational manner. Be prepared to drop suggestions if people aren't buying it. You also want to try and suggest the same improvement as few times as possible. For example, it is ok to say "we could use github for this" every time there is a new project/problem but it is not ok to tell Dave Anonymous "github would be really good for your project" then proceed to tell Dave's colleagues how good github would be for Dave after he has already indicated that he isn't interested. Dave will be annoyed and maybe never respect you again. The trick here is working out the right time/situation/person to put forward your suggestion and restricting yourself to one time/situation/person per idea.


                      Ideally you don't want to spend any time criticising or fighting with your "senior" colleague but there are some times when this is unavoidable. e.g. if your colleague is deleting your work. In all of these cases you need to go to your boss with a clear outline of the problem and what you would like to change.



                      In the case of deleted work you could say "X is deleting my work without talking to me. Please could we have a meeting with you, me and X to agree on some kind of framework for version control (replace version control with whatever you think would help). I'm sorry to bring this to you but I haven't been able to find a solution with person X." Do make sure that you have already tried speaking to X before your boss. Also make sure that you have a tangible example of work deleted. Perhaps you don't have the code itself (since it was deleted) but you should be able to describe how long the code was and what it did.






                      share|improve this answer


























                        2












                        2








                        2







                        Long term advice: if you decide to stay in the job then change will only happen in proportion to the amount the team respects you.



                        Short term advice: pick your battles and try to get other people to fight them for you. If you do this successfully you will build respect. You may have squandered a lot of respect by not doing this successfully.



                        Some rules of thumb for picking your battles:




                        1. Anything adversarial should go directly through your boss. Do not directly criticise or complain about colleagues in front of other colleagues. Your boss is the the person who directly controls your senior colleague so speaking to anyone else about adversarial issues is pointless (and potentially dangerous, if they are friends with senior).

                        2. You can suggest improvements to anyone but try to do this in a non-confrontational manner. Be prepared to drop suggestions if people aren't buying it. You also want to try and suggest the same improvement as few times as possible. For example, it is ok to say "we could use github for this" every time there is a new project/problem but it is not ok to tell Dave Anonymous "github would be really good for your project" then proceed to tell Dave's colleagues how good github would be for Dave after he has already indicated that he isn't interested. Dave will be annoyed and maybe never respect you again. The trick here is working out the right time/situation/person to put forward your suggestion and restricting yourself to one time/situation/person per idea.


                        Ideally you don't want to spend any time criticising or fighting with your "senior" colleague but there are some times when this is unavoidable. e.g. if your colleague is deleting your work. In all of these cases you need to go to your boss with a clear outline of the problem and what you would like to change.



                        In the case of deleted work you could say "X is deleting my work without talking to me. Please could we have a meeting with you, me and X to agree on some kind of framework for version control (replace version control with whatever you think would help). I'm sorry to bring this to you but I haven't been able to find a solution with person X." Do make sure that you have already tried speaking to X before your boss. Also make sure that you have a tangible example of work deleted. Perhaps you don't have the code itself (since it was deleted) but you should be able to describe how long the code was and what it did.






                        share|improve this answer













                        Long term advice: if you decide to stay in the job then change will only happen in proportion to the amount the team respects you.



                        Short term advice: pick your battles and try to get other people to fight them for you. If you do this successfully you will build respect. You may have squandered a lot of respect by not doing this successfully.



                        Some rules of thumb for picking your battles:




                        1. Anything adversarial should go directly through your boss. Do not directly criticise or complain about colleagues in front of other colleagues. Your boss is the the person who directly controls your senior colleague so speaking to anyone else about adversarial issues is pointless (and potentially dangerous, if they are friends with senior).

                        2. You can suggest improvements to anyone but try to do this in a non-confrontational manner. Be prepared to drop suggestions if people aren't buying it. You also want to try and suggest the same improvement as few times as possible. For example, it is ok to say "we could use github for this" every time there is a new project/problem but it is not ok to tell Dave Anonymous "github would be really good for your project" then proceed to tell Dave's colleagues how good github would be for Dave after he has already indicated that he isn't interested. Dave will be annoyed and maybe never respect you again. The trick here is working out the right time/situation/person to put forward your suggestion and restricting yourself to one time/situation/person per idea.


                        Ideally you don't want to spend any time criticising or fighting with your "senior" colleague but there are some times when this is unavoidable. e.g. if your colleague is deleting your work. In all of these cases you need to go to your boss with a clear outline of the problem and what you would like to change.



                        In the case of deleted work you could say "X is deleting my work without talking to me. Please could we have a meeting with you, me and X to agree on some kind of framework for version control (replace version control with whatever you think would help). I'm sorry to bring this to you but I haven't been able to find a solution with person X." Do make sure that you have already tried speaking to X before your boss. Also make sure that you have a tangible example of work deleted. Perhaps you don't have the code itself (since it was deleted) but you should be able to describe how long the code was and what it did.







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered 9 hours ago









                        P. HopkinsonP. Hopkinson

                        4445




                        4445























                            2














                            Do the job the best way you can regardless of circumstance



                            You were hired for your skills and expertise. The fact that a "senior" engineer doesn't recognise that isn't your fault.



                            The way I see it you have three options:



                            Option 1: Leave



                            This situation raises numerous red flags. A small development team entirely controlled by one inexperienced leader, no consultation on process, poor standards and quality control, etc.. You could well be better off elsewhere.



                            Only choose this option if you feel you can't make it work otherwise. Leaving during probation can look bad on a resume. You will need to explain it and see yourself well in all future interviews.



                            Option 2: Submit



                            Lower your own standards to fit in with the team. You're new; don't rock the boat. He does have another year's experience compared to you. Clearly he knows more; just sit there and learn from the master of all things programming.



                            Don't choose this option. You're better than that.



                            Option 3: Try to improve the situation



                            This is what you were hired to do. Do the job to the best of your ability despite adversity. You have said that direct confrontation didn't work and your concerns were dismissed. You need evidence to support yourself. Some things you could try:



                            Ask to document the current development process.



                            "I'm having trouble getting my head around our development process. If you explain it to me I'll document it for the next new starter." There is no reasonable cause to reject such a request. Best case, you will discover the process isn't as bad as you thought. More likely case is you can use this to identify special deficiencies or problems you can improve. Worst case, your request gets rejected, see Option 1.



                            Present Solutions, not Problems



                            Write up formal documentation for what process you want to change. Make notes of specific problems the team has had that this process with resolve in the future. You know an off-hand suggestion to change will be dismissed, and don't give them that chance. Present the team leader and management with a well researched and documented approach to solve problems. Now you aren't the new kid causing issues; you are the solution to problems they already had.



                            Be polite and don't start fights



                            You need to be the bigger person in this situation. Show yourself as rational and willing to listen. If an idea gets shot down, accept it and move on. When the problems inevitably reoccur you can bring it up then. You don't want to be seen as a troublemaker; earn their represent through your behaviour even if you can't change their minds.






                            share|improve this answer










                            New contributor




                            linksassin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                            • OP wasn't hired to "improve the situation".That's a misguided sentiment.OP is there to WRITE CODE.Management and leads are the ones who improve anyhting as they are there for that reason (among other things) and actually have the AUTHORITY to do so! Code monkeys take the banana and do what they're told. That doesn't mean they can't voice their concerns, it just means they have to accept the pecking order and behave according to managements decisions,even if they think, it's wrong and they know better...this is something young people understand the least

                              – DigitalBlade969
                              11 hours ago













                            • @DigitalBlade969 "OP is there to WRITE CODE", "Code monkeys take the banana and do what they're told", "have to accept the pecking order and behave according to managements decisions,even if they think, it's wrong and they know better" - > No they really don't. "Code monkeys" even. Show some respect, or gain some. Either, way, don't care. Flagged as rude. Should know better seeing your time here.

                              – rkeet
                              8 hours ago











                            • @rkeet hahahaha rude?! Code monkey is a widely, even lovingly used term, not an insult. Gain some perspective. Also, YES they do have to follow instructions of superiors.In what phantasy land do you live? That's how the real world works, especially businesses, where other peoples' money and livelyhoods are at stake! And it is NOT within a junior programmers responsibilities to change the pipeline or lead the team unless instructed or asked to do so.

                              – DigitalBlade969
                              7 hours ago













                            • I think leaving during probation period is still better explainable with "it was not a good fit" than leaving shortly after probation. The probation period isn't only there to access the employee, but also the employer. (In case OP wants out ASAP). This may be culture dependend though.

                              – Rhayene
                              7 hours ago
















                            2














                            Do the job the best way you can regardless of circumstance



                            You were hired for your skills and expertise. The fact that a "senior" engineer doesn't recognise that isn't your fault.



                            The way I see it you have three options:



                            Option 1: Leave



                            This situation raises numerous red flags. A small development team entirely controlled by one inexperienced leader, no consultation on process, poor standards and quality control, etc.. You could well be better off elsewhere.



                            Only choose this option if you feel you can't make it work otherwise. Leaving during probation can look bad on a resume. You will need to explain it and see yourself well in all future interviews.



                            Option 2: Submit



                            Lower your own standards to fit in with the team. You're new; don't rock the boat. He does have another year's experience compared to you. Clearly he knows more; just sit there and learn from the master of all things programming.



                            Don't choose this option. You're better than that.



                            Option 3: Try to improve the situation



                            This is what you were hired to do. Do the job to the best of your ability despite adversity. You have said that direct confrontation didn't work and your concerns were dismissed. You need evidence to support yourself. Some things you could try:



                            Ask to document the current development process.



                            "I'm having trouble getting my head around our development process. If you explain it to me I'll document it for the next new starter." There is no reasonable cause to reject such a request. Best case, you will discover the process isn't as bad as you thought. More likely case is you can use this to identify special deficiencies or problems you can improve. Worst case, your request gets rejected, see Option 1.



                            Present Solutions, not Problems



                            Write up formal documentation for what process you want to change. Make notes of specific problems the team has had that this process with resolve in the future. You know an off-hand suggestion to change will be dismissed, and don't give them that chance. Present the team leader and management with a well researched and documented approach to solve problems. Now you aren't the new kid causing issues; you are the solution to problems they already had.



                            Be polite and don't start fights



                            You need to be the bigger person in this situation. Show yourself as rational and willing to listen. If an idea gets shot down, accept it and move on. When the problems inevitably reoccur you can bring it up then. You don't want to be seen as a troublemaker; earn their represent through your behaviour even if you can't change their minds.






                            share|improve this answer










                            New contributor




                            linksassin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                            • OP wasn't hired to "improve the situation".That's a misguided sentiment.OP is there to WRITE CODE.Management and leads are the ones who improve anyhting as they are there for that reason (among other things) and actually have the AUTHORITY to do so! Code monkeys take the banana and do what they're told. That doesn't mean they can't voice their concerns, it just means they have to accept the pecking order and behave according to managements decisions,even if they think, it's wrong and they know better...this is something young people understand the least

                              – DigitalBlade969
                              11 hours ago













                            • @DigitalBlade969 "OP is there to WRITE CODE", "Code monkeys take the banana and do what they're told", "have to accept the pecking order and behave according to managements decisions,even if they think, it's wrong and they know better" - > No they really don't. "Code monkeys" even. Show some respect, or gain some. Either, way, don't care. Flagged as rude. Should know better seeing your time here.

                              – rkeet
                              8 hours ago











                            • @rkeet hahahaha rude?! Code monkey is a widely, even lovingly used term, not an insult. Gain some perspective. Also, YES they do have to follow instructions of superiors.In what phantasy land do you live? That's how the real world works, especially businesses, where other peoples' money and livelyhoods are at stake! And it is NOT within a junior programmers responsibilities to change the pipeline or lead the team unless instructed or asked to do so.

                              – DigitalBlade969
                              7 hours ago













                            • I think leaving during probation period is still better explainable with "it was not a good fit" than leaving shortly after probation. The probation period isn't only there to access the employee, but also the employer. (In case OP wants out ASAP). This may be culture dependend though.

                              – Rhayene
                              7 hours ago














                            2












                            2








                            2







                            Do the job the best way you can regardless of circumstance



                            You were hired for your skills and expertise. The fact that a "senior" engineer doesn't recognise that isn't your fault.



                            The way I see it you have three options:



                            Option 1: Leave



                            This situation raises numerous red flags. A small development team entirely controlled by one inexperienced leader, no consultation on process, poor standards and quality control, etc.. You could well be better off elsewhere.



                            Only choose this option if you feel you can't make it work otherwise. Leaving during probation can look bad on a resume. You will need to explain it and see yourself well in all future interviews.



                            Option 2: Submit



                            Lower your own standards to fit in with the team. You're new; don't rock the boat. He does have another year's experience compared to you. Clearly he knows more; just sit there and learn from the master of all things programming.



                            Don't choose this option. You're better than that.



                            Option 3: Try to improve the situation



                            This is what you were hired to do. Do the job to the best of your ability despite adversity. You have said that direct confrontation didn't work and your concerns were dismissed. You need evidence to support yourself. Some things you could try:



                            Ask to document the current development process.



                            "I'm having trouble getting my head around our development process. If you explain it to me I'll document it for the next new starter." There is no reasonable cause to reject such a request. Best case, you will discover the process isn't as bad as you thought. More likely case is you can use this to identify special deficiencies or problems you can improve. Worst case, your request gets rejected, see Option 1.



                            Present Solutions, not Problems



                            Write up formal documentation for what process you want to change. Make notes of specific problems the team has had that this process with resolve in the future. You know an off-hand suggestion to change will be dismissed, and don't give them that chance. Present the team leader and management with a well researched and documented approach to solve problems. Now you aren't the new kid causing issues; you are the solution to problems they already had.



                            Be polite and don't start fights



                            You need to be the bigger person in this situation. Show yourself as rational and willing to listen. If an idea gets shot down, accept it and move on. When the problems inevitably reoccur you can bring it up then. You don't want to be seen as a troublemaker; earn their represent through your behaviour even if you can't change their minds.






                            share|improve this answer










                            New contributor




                            linksassin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.










                            Do the job the best way you can regardless of circumstance



                            You were hired for your skills and expertise. The fact that a "senior" engineer doesn't recognise that isn't your fault.



                            The way I see it you have three options:



                            Option 1: Leave



                            This situation raises numerous red flags. A small development team entirely controlled by one inexperienced leader, no consultation on process, poor standards and quality control, etc.. You could well be better off elsewhere.



                            Only choose this option if you feel you can't make it work otherwise. Leaving during probation can look bad on a resume. You will need to explain it and see yourself well in all future interviews.



                            Option 2: Submit



                            Lower your own standards to fit in with the team. You're new; don't rock the boat. He does have another year's experience compared to you. Clearly he knows more; just sit there and learn from the master of all things programming.



                            Don't choose this option. You're better than that.



                            Option 3: Try to improve the situation



                            This is what you were hired to do. Do the job to the best of your ability despite adversity. You have said that direct confrontation didn't work and your concerns were dismissed. You need evidence to support yourself. Some things you could try:



                            Ask to document the current development process.



                            "I'm having trouble getting my head around our development process. If you explain it to me I'll document it for the next new starter." There is no reasonable cause to reject such a request. Best case, you will discover the process isn't as bad as you thought. More likely case is you can use this to identify special deficiencies or problems you can improve. Worst case, your request gets rejected, see Option 1.



                            Present Solutions, not Problems



                            Write up formal documentation for what process you want to change. Make notes of specific problems the team has had that this process with resolve in the future. You know an off-hand suggestion to change will be dismissed, and don't give them that chance. Present the team leader and management with a well researched and documented approach to solve problems. Now you aren't the new kid causing issues; you are the solution to problems they already had.



                            Be polite and don't start fights



                            You need to be the bigger person in this situation. Show yourself as rational and willing to listen. If an idea gets shot down, accept it and move on. When the problems inevitably reoccur you can bring it up then. You don't want to be seen as a troublemaker; earn their represent through your behaviour even if you can't change their minds.







                            share|improve this answer










                            New contributor




                            linksassin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited 7 hours ago









                            Peter Mortensen

                            55547




                            55547






                            New contributor




                            linksassin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            answered 14 hours ago









                            linksassinlinksassin

                            1213




                            1213




                            New contributor




                            linksassin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.





                            New contributor





                            linksassin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






                            linksassin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.













                            • OP wasn't hired to "improve the situation".That's a misguided sentiment.OP is there to WRITE CODE.Management and leads are the ones who improve anyhting as they are there for that reason (among other things) and actually have the AUTHORITY to do so! Code monkeys take the banana and do what they're told. That doesn't mean they can't voice their concerns, it just means they have to accept the pecking order and behave according to managements decisions,even if they think, it's wrong and they know better...this is something young people understand the least

                              – DigitalBlade969
                              11 hours ago













                            • @DigitalBlade969 "OP is there to WRITE CODE", "Code monkeys take the banana and do what they're told", "have to accept the pecking order and behave according to managements decisions,even if they think, it's wrong and they know better" - > No they really don't. "Code monkeys" even. Show some respect, or gain some. Either, way, don't care. Flagged as rude. Should know better seeing your time here.

                              – rkeet
                              8 hours ago











                            • @rkeet hahahaha rude?! Code monkey is a widely, even lovingly used term, not an insult. Gain some perspective. Also, YES they do have to follow instructions of superiors.In what phantasy land do you live? That's how the real world works, especially businesses, where other peoples' money and livelyhoods are at stake! And it is NOT within a junior programmers responsibilities to change the pipeline or lead the team unless instructed or asked to do so.

                              – DigitalBlade969
                              7 hours ago













                            • I think leaving during probation period is still better explainable with "it was not a good fit" than leaving shortly after probation. The probation period isn't only there to access the employee, but also the employer. (In case OP wants out ASAP). This may be culture dependend though.

                              – Rhayene
                              7 hours ago



















                            • OP wasn't hired to "improve the situation".That's a misguided sentiment.OP is there to WRITE CODE.Management and leads are the ones who improve anyhting as they are there for that reason (among other things) and actually have the AUTHORITY to do so! Code monkeys take the banana and do what they're told. That doesn't mean they can't voice their concerns, it just means they have to accept the pecking order and behave according to managements decisions,even if they think, it's wrong and they know better...this is something young people understand the least

                              – DigitalBlade969
                              11 hours ago













                            • @DigitalBlade969 "OP is there to WRITE CODE", "Code monkeys take the banana and do what they're told", "have to accept the pecking order and behave according to managements decisions,even if they think, it's wrong and they know better" - > No they really don't. "Code monkeys" even. Show some respect, or gain some. Either, way, don't care. Flagged as rude. Should know better seeing your time here.

                              – rkeet
                              8 hours ago











                            • @rkeet hahahaha rude?! Code monkey is a widely, even lovingly used term, not an insult. Gain some perspective. Also, YES they do have to follow instructions of superiors.In what phantasy land do you live? That's how the real world works, especially businesses, where other peoples' money and livelyhoods are at stake! And it is NOT within a junior programmers responsibilities to change the pipeline or lead the team unless instructed or asked to do so.

                              – DigitalBlade969
                              7 hours ago













                            • I think leaving during probation period is still better explainable with "it was not a good fit" than leaving shortly after probation. The probation period isn't only there to access the employee, but also the employer. (In case OP wants out ASAP). This may be culture dependend though.

                              – Rhayene
                              7 hours ago

















                            OP wasn't hired to "improve the situation".That's a misguided sentiment.OP is there to WRITE CODE.Management and leads are the ones who improve anyhting as they are there for that reason (among other things) and actually have the AUTHORITY to do so! Code monkeys take the banana and do what they're told. That doesn't mean they can't voice their concerns, it just means they have to accept the pecking order and behave according to managements decisions,even if they think, it's wrong and they know better...this is something young people understand the least

                            – DigitalBlade969
                            11 hours ago







                            OP wasn't hired to "improve the situation".That's a misguided sentiment.OP is there to WRITE CODE.Management and leads are the ones who improve anyhting as they are there for that reason (among other things) and actually have the AUTHORITY to do so! Code monkeys take the banana and do what they're told. That doesn't mean they can't voice their concerns, it just means they have to accept the pecking order and behave according to managements decisions,even if they think, it's wrong and they know better...this is something young people understand the least

                            – DigitalBlade969
                            11 hours ago















                            @DigitalBlade969 "OP is there to WRITE CODE", "Code monkeys take the banana and do what they're told", "have to accept the pecking order and behave according to managements decisions,even if they think, it's wrong and they know better" - > No they really don't. "Code monkeys" even. Show some respect, or gain some. Either, way, don't care. Flagged as rude. Should know better seeing your time here.

                            – rkeet
                            8 hours ago





                            @DigitalBlade969 "OP is there to WRITE CODE", "Code monkeys take the banana and do what they're told", "have to accept the pecking order and behave according to managements decisions,even if they think, it's wrong and they know better" - > No they really don't. "Code monkeys" even. Show some respect, or gain some. Either, way, don't care. Flagged as rude. Should know better seeing your time here.

                            – rkeet
                            8 hours ago













                            @rkeet hahahaha rude?! Code monkey is a widely, even lovingly used term, not an insult. Gain some perspective. Also, YES they do have to follow instructions of superiors.In what phantasy land do you live? That's how the real world works, especially businesses, where other peoples' money and livelyhoods are at stake! And it is NOT within a junior programmers responsibilities to change the pipeline or lead the team unless instructed or asked to do so.

                            – DigitalBlade969
                            7 hours ago







                            @rkeet hahahaha rude?! Code monkey is a widely, even lovingly used term, not an insult. Gain some perspective. Also, YES they do have to follow instructions of superiors.In what phantasy land do you live? That's how the real world works, especially businesses, where other peoples' money and livelyhoods are at stake! And it is NOT within a junior programmers responsibilities to change the pipeline or lead the team unless instructed or asked to do so.

                            – DigitalBlade969
                            7 hours ago















                            I think leaving during probation period is still better explainable with "it was not a good fit" than leaving shortly after probation. The probation period isn't only there to access the employee, but also the employer. (In case OP wants out ASAP). This may be culture dependend though.

                            – Rhayene
                            7 hours ago





                            I think leaving during probation period is still better explainable with "it was not a good fit" than leaving shortly after probation. The probation period isn't only there to access the employee, but also the employer. (In case OP wants out ASAP). This may be culture dependend though.

                            – Rhayene
                            7 hours ago











                            1















                            "Because of him being the only developer in the team for more than a year, no one challenged his opinions and ideas on how processes should work."




                            That is exactly what happened to me at work, and that's happened not only in programming, but also in every field work. (I'm not programming, but I have the same situation as yours.)



                            I don't say my senior (same situation with your senior) is bad at all. Sometimes I give some advice/opinion/critic, but she rejected it, she won't discuss it and find out the best way to solve the problem.



                            But my condition is worse than you. Basically I know, I already lose the war before it even started.



                            Well, if you are looking for the answer, maybe it only has two options:




                            1. Brace yourself, and accept the condition, considering if you need (have) to keep your job. I believe karma is real.


                            2. You could resign and find another job. I mean, why would you live in a place that makes you unhappy, right?



                            And sometimes, the truth will reveal itself. I mean it's better for you to focus on yourself, use your energy and your time to develop your ability and skills rather than think about them, ignore close-minded people like your senior (also mine).



                            And the meaning of "the truth will reveal itself" - who knows, five years later your senior will be stuck at a low-grade job and you got into a higher-level job at a different company. Who knows, right?






                            share|improve this answer










                            New contributor




                            RPP is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                              1















                              "Because of him being the only developer in the team for more than a year, no one challenged his opinions and ideas on how processes should work."




                              That is exactly what happened to me at work, and that's happened not only in programming, but also in every field work. (I'm not programming, but I have the same situation as yours.)



                              I don't say my senior (same situation with your senior) is bad at all. Sometimes I give some advice/opinion/critic, but she rejected it, she won't discuss it and find out the best way to solve the problem.



                              But my condition is worse than you. Basically I know, I already lose the war before it even started.



                              Well, if you are looking for the answer, maybe it only has two options:




                              1. Brace yourself, and accept the condition, considering if you need (have) to keep your job. I believe karma is real.


                              2. You could resign and find another job. I mean, why would you live in a place that makes you unhappy, right?



                              And sometimes, the truth will reveal itself. I mean it's better for you to focus on yourself, use your energy and your time to develop your ability and skills rather than think about them, ignore close-minded people like your senior (also mine).



                              And the meaning of "the truth will reveal itself" - who knows, five years later your senior will be stuck at a low-grade job and you got into a higher-level job at a different company. Who knows, right?






                              share|improve this answer










                              New contributor




                              RPP is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.























                                1












                                1








                                1








                                "Because of him being the only developer in the team for more than a year, no one challenged his opinions and ideas on how processes should work."




                                That is exactly what happened to me at work, and that's happened not only in programming, but also in every field work. (I'm not programming, but I have the same situation as yours.)



                                I don't say my senior (same situation with your senior) is bad at all. Sometimes I give some advice/opinion/critic, but she rejected it, she won't discuss it and find out the best way to solve the problem.



                                But my condition is worse than you. Basically I know, I already lose the war before it even started.



                                Well, if you are looking for the answer, maybe it only has two options:




                                1. Brace yourself, and accept the condition, considering if you need (have) to keep your job. I believe karma is real.


                                2. You could resign and find another job. I mean, why would you live in a place that makes you unhappy, right?



                                And sometimes, the truth will reveal itself. I mean it's better for you to focus on yourself, use your energy and your time to develop your ability and skills rather than think about them, ignore close-minded people like your senior (also mine).



                                And the meaning of "the truth will reveal itself" - who knows, five years later your senior will be stuck at a low-grade job and you got into a higher-level job at a different company. Who knows, right?






                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor




                                RPP is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.











                                "Because of him being the only developer in the team for more than a year, no one challenged his opinions and ideas on how processes should work."




                                That is exactly what happened to me at work, and that's happened not only in programming, but also in every field work. (I'm not programming, but I have the same situation as yours.)



                                I don't say my senior (same situation with your senior) is bad at all. Sometimes I give some advice/opinion/critic, but she rejected it, she won't discuss it and find out the best way to solve the problem.



                                But my condition is worse than you. Basically I know, I already lose the war before it even started.



                                Well, if you are looking for the answer, maybe it only has two options:




                                1. Brace yourself, and accept the condition, considering if you need (have) to keep your job. I believe karma is real.


                                2. You could resign and find another job. I mean, why would you live in a place that makes you unhappy, right?



                                And sometimes, the truth will reveal itself. I mean it's better for you to focus on yourself, use your energy and your time to develop your ability and skills rather than think about them, ignore close-minded people like your senior (also mine).



                                And the meaning of "the truth will reveal itself" - who knows, five years later your senior will be stuck at a low-grade job and you got into a higher-level job at a different company. Who knows, right?







                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor




                                RPP is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited 7 hours ago









                                Peter Mortensen

                                55547




                                55547






                                New contributor




                                RPP is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                answered 15 hours ago









                                RPPRPP

                                192




                                192




                                New contributor




                                RPP is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                New contributor





                                RPP is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                RPP is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.























                                    1















                                    "which was not communicated to anyone"





                                    • anyone, or you?


                                    He's not gained this trust because he hides what he's doing, or because he doesn't deliver. I would suggest that it's just you he doesn't feel the need to explain things to YOU - which leaves you in the dark in multiple different ways.



                                    IF you plan to stay there, then the solution is to improve communication in your team; find out why he thinks you were so wrong, and explain to him that unless he communicates plans with you, you will never be productive.



                                    It sounds like he's new to managing teams and projects; but is a much trusted member of the company. Attempting to push him down will only backfire, and you never know maybe his reasoning will make sense.






                                    share|improve this answer




























                                      1















                                      "which was not communicated to anyone"





                                      • anyone, or you?


                                      He's not gained this trust because he hides what he's doing, or because he doesn't deliver. I would suggest that it's just you he doesn't feel the need to explain things to YOU - which leaves you in the dark in multiple different ways.



                                      IF you plan to stay there, then the solution is to improve communication in your team; find out why he thinks you were so wrong, and explain to him that unless he communicates plans with you, you will never be productive.



                                      It sounds like he's new to managing teams and projects; but is a much trusted member of the company. Attempting to push him down will only backfire, and you never know maybe his reasoning will make sense.






                                      share|improve this answer


























                                        1












                                        1








                                        1








                                        "which was not communicated to anyone"





                                        • anyone, or you?


                                        He's not gained this trust because he hides what he's doing, or because he doesn't deliver. I would suggest that it's just you he doesn't feel the need to explain things to YOU - which leaves you in the dark in multiple different ways.



                                        IF you plan to stay there, then the solution is to improve communication in your team; find out why he thinks you were so wrong, and explain to him that unless he communicates plans with you, you will never be productive.



                                        It sounds like he's new to managing teams and projects; but is a much trusted member of the company. Attempting to push him down will only backfire, and you never know maybe his reasoning will make sense.






                                        share|improve this answer














                                        "which was not communicated to anyone"





                                        • anyone, or you?


                                        He's not gained this trust because he hides what he's doing, or because he doesn't deliver. I would suggest that it's just you he doesn't feel the need to explain things to YOU - which leaves you in the dark in multiple different ways.



                                        IF you plan to stay there, then the solution is to improve communication in your team; find out why he thinks you were so wrong, and explain to him that unless he communicates plans with you, you will never be productive.



                                        It sounds like he's new to managing teams and projects; but is a much trusted member of the company. Attempting to push him down will only backfire, and you never know maybe his reasoning will make sense.







                                        share|improve this answer












                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer










                                        answered 5 hours ago









                                        UKMonkeyUKMonkey

                                        2,245515




                                        2,245515























                                            0














                                            Do you currently have the great luck of working in an industry where there's plenty of work.



                                            Right now you should be working for a company where either a) you love your job or b) you are learning every single day (which will help with a) in the long term). I can see no reason whatsoever for you to remain at this job.






                                            share|improve this answer




























                                              0














                                              Do you currently have the great luck of working in an industry where there's plenty of work.



                                              Right now you should be working for a company where either a) you love your job or b) you are learning every single day (which will help with a) in the long term). I can see no reason whatsoever for you to remain at this job.






                                              share|improve this answer


























                                                0












                                                0








                                                0







                                                Do you currently have the great luck of working in an industry where there's plenty of work.



                                                Right now you should be working for a company where either a) you love your job or b) you are learning every single day (which will help with a) in the long term). I can see no reason whatsoever for you to remain at this job.






                                                share|improve this answer













                                                Do you currently have the great luck of working in an industry where there's plenty of work.



                                                Right now you should be working for a company where either a) you love your job or b) you are learning every single day (which will help with a) in the long term). I can see no reason whatsoever for you to remain at this job.







                                                share|improve this answer












                                                share|improve this answer



                                                share|improve this answer










                                                answered 16 hours ago









                                                bnielandbnieland

                                                2214




                                                2214























                                                    -1














                                                    Often times the best programmers are the ones with the humility to admit when they're wrong and that don't need to hide behind layers of bullshit to cover up for not knowing something






                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                    New contributor




                                                    robertmain is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                                    • 6





                                                      I don't disagree with the sentiment, but I'm not sure how it can be considered an answer. It would be helpful if you could flesh this out into something that provides an action that can be taken, or other solution to the situation.

                                                      – Booga Roo
                                                      12 hours ago
















                                                    -1














                                                    Often times the best programmers are the ones with the humility to admit when they're wrong and that don't need to hide behind layers of bullshit to cover up for not knowing something






                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                    New contributor




                                                    robertmain is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                                    • 6





                                                      I don't disagree with the sentiment, but I'm not sure how it can be considered an answer. It would be helpful if you could flesh this out into something that provides an action that can be taken, or other solution to the situation.

                                                      – Booga Roo
                                                      12 hours ago














                                                    -1












                                                    -1








                                                    -1







                                                    Often times the best programmers are the ones with the humility to admit when they're wrong and that don't need to hide behind layers of bullshit to cover up for not knowing something






                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                    New contributor




                                                    robertmain is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.










                                                    Often times the best programmers are the ones with the humility to admit when they're wrong and that don't need to hide behind layers of bullshit to cover up for not knowing something







                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                    New contributor




                                                    robertmain is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                    share|improve this answer






                                                    New contributor




                                                    robertmain is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                    answered 16 hours ago









                                                    robertmainrobertmain

                                                    231




                                                    231




                                                    New contributor




                                                    robertmain is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                                    New contributor





                                                    robertmain is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                                    robertmain is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.








                                                    • 6





                                                      I don't disagree with the sentiment, but I'm not sure how it can be considered an answer. It would be helpful if you could flesh this out into something that provides an action that can be taken, or other solution to the situation.

                                                      – Booga Roo
                                                      12 hours ago














                                                    • 6





                                                      I don't disagree with the sentiment, but I'm not sure how it can be considered an answer. It would be helpful if you could flesh this out into something that provides an action that can be taken, or other solution to the situation.

                                                      – Booga Roo
                                                      12 hours ago








                                                    6




                                                    6





                                                    I don't disagree with the sentiment, but I'm not sure how it can be considered an answer. It would be helpful if you could flesh this out into something that provides an action that can be taken, or other solution to the situation.

                                                    – Booga Roo
                                                    12 hours ago





                                                    I don't disagree with the sentiment, but I'm not sure how it can be considered an answer. It would be helpful if you could flesh this out into something that provides an action that can be taken, or other solution to the situation.

                                                    – Booga Roo
                                                    12 hours ago



                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                    VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...

                                                    Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Mirandela Referências Menu de...

                                                    looking for continuous Screen Capture for retroactivly reproducing errors, timeback machineRolling desktop...