Does Skippy chunky peanut butter contain trans fat?Does having late or heavy dinner make you fat?Is peanut...
Does the ditching switch allow an A320 to float indefinitely?
Can you determine if focus is sharp without diopter adjustment if your sight is imperfect?
Which RAF squadrons and aircraft types took part in the bombing of Berlin on the 25th of August 1940?
Non-Cancer terminal illness that can affect young (age 10-13) girls?
Why is it that Bernie Sanders is always called a "socialist"?
Calculate of total length of edges in Voronoi diagram
What to do with threats of blacklisting?
Reading Mishnayos without understanding
What is the industry term for house wiring diagrams?
Critique vs nitpicking
Cat is tipping over bed-side lamps during the night
Is there a way to store 9th-level spells in a Glyph of Warding or similar method?
Is there a verb that means to inject with poison?
Does it take energy to move something in a circle?
Can a player sacrifice a creature after declaring that creature as blocker while taking lethal damage?
Article. The word "Respect"
Equivalent of "illegal" for violating civil law
Find the smallest value of the function
Custom shape shows unwanted extra line
Why didn't Tom Riddle take the presence of Fawkes and the Sorting Hat as more of a threat?
How to politely refuse in-office gym instructor for steroids and protein
Why didn't the 2019 Oscars have a host?
How can the probability of a fumble decrease linearly with more dice?
What is a good reason for every spaceship to carry a weapon on board?
Does Skippy chunky peanut butter contain trans fat?
Does having late or heavy dinner make you fat?Is peanut butter good for removing gum?Does organic butter have more Omega-3 fat than conventional butter?Does eating trans fatty acids affect immune response?Does Forskolin help to break down fat?Is dietary cholesterol related to blood serum cholesterol?Is margarine healthier for you than butter?Does the average American Thanksgiving meal contain 4,500 Calories?Does ghee help burn body fat?Does Condensed Milk Contain Milk?
According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.
However, the current label for their chunky peanut butter contains the following ingredient in the listing: Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil (Cottonseed, Soybean and Rapeseed Oil) To Prevent Separation.
Soybean oil is a known source of trans fat, which can be a source of atherosclerosis – the clogging of arteries with cholesterol – which can be a cause of heart attacks.
Is their website just blatantly lying about the lack of trans fat?
nutrition
New contributor
Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.
However, the current label for their chunky peanut butter contains the following ingredient in the listing: Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil (Cottonseed, Soybean and Rapeseed Oil) To Prevent Separation.
Soybean oil is a known source of trans fat, which can be a source of atherosclerosis – the clogging of arteries with cholesterol – which can be a cause of heart attacks.
Is their website just blatantly lying about the lack of trans fat?
nutrition
New contributor
Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Could it be that local law allows "...has zero grams per serving." meaning "...has less than one gram per serving."?
– npst
10 hours ago
add a comment |
According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.
However, the current label for their chunky peanut butter contains the following ingredient in the listing: Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil (Cottonseed, Soybean and Rapeseed Oil) To Prevent Separation.
Soybean oil is a known source of trans fat, which can be a source of atherosclerosis – the clogging of arteries with cholesterol – which can be a cause of heart attacks.
Is their website just blatantly lying about the lack of trans fat?
nutrition
New contributor
Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.
However, the current label for their chunky peanut butter contains the following ingredient in the listing: Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil (Cottonseed, Soybean and Rapeseed Oil) To Prevent Separation.
Soybean oil is a known source of trans fat, which can be a source of atherosclerosis – the clogging of arteries with cholesterol – which can be a cause of heart attacks.
Is their website just blatantly lying about the lack of trans fat?
nutrition
nutrition
New contributor
Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 11 hours ago
Chris RedfordChris Redford
1737
1737
New contributor
Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Could it be that local law allows "...has zero grams per serving." meaning "...has less than one gram per serving."?
– npst
10 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Could it be that local law allows "...has zero grams per serving." meaning "...has less than one gram per serving."?
– npst
10 hours ago
1
1
Could it be that local law allows "...has zero grams per serving." meaning "...has less than one gram per serving."?
– npst
10 hours ago
Could it be that local law allows "...has zero grams per serving." meaning "...has less than one gram per serving."?
– npst
10 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.
Strictly speaking, according to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter contains a negligible amount of trans fat. Per the US FDA,
The Nutrition Facts Label can state 0 g of trans fat if the food product contains less than 0.5 g of trans fat per serving. Thus, if a product contains partially hydrogenated oils, then it might contain small amounts of trans fat even if the label says 0 g of trans fat.
So they're being sneaky, right? Not really. The amount of trans fat in a serving of peanut butter is far less than the limit of 0.5 grams that needs to be reported as above zero. Only a tiny amount of hydrogenated vegetable oil is added to peanut butter to make it smooth, prevent separation, and drastically increase shelf life, and only a small amount of that small amount is in the form of trans fat. While non-zero, the amount is essentially undetectable. From Sanders, T.H., 2001. Non-detectable levels of trans-fatty acids in peanut butter. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 49(5), pp.2349-2351,
The fatty acid composition of 11 brands of peanut butter and paste freshly prepared from roasted peanuts was analyzed with emphasis on isomeric trans-fatty acids. No trans-fatty acids were detected in any of the samples in an analytical system with a detection threshold of 0.01% of the sample weight. Hydrogenated vegetable oils are added to peanut butters at levels of 1--2% to prevent oil separation. Some hydrogenated vegetable oils are known to be sources of trans-fatty acids in the human diet. The addition of these products was not found to result in measurable amounts of trans-fatty acids in the peanut butters analyzed.
11
This is similar to the reason why Tic Tacs are labelled as sugar-free, despite consisting of almost nothing but sugar.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
7 hours ago
19
@JanusBahsJacquet I don't think it's remotely similar. The serving size for Tic Tacs is 0.49 g (1 mint) so it couldn't possibly be above 0.5 g sugar per serving, and it is in fact mostly sugar. That is an extreme example highlighting the problem with setting these limits relative to serving size, which is a somewhat arbitrary concept (who eats just one Tic Tac?) . For Skippy peanut butter on the other hand, the serving size is 32 g, so less than 0.5 g trans fat means less than ~1.5%, and the study linked to in this answer shows that actual levels are less than 0.01%.
– jkej
6 hours ago
11
@JanusBahsJacquet, No, it's very different. Tic Tacs are 91% sugar by weight, but since a Tic Tac "serving" is less than 1/2 gram, Tic Tacs have less than the reportable amount of anything. Peanut butter on the other hand contains less than 0.01% trans fat by weight. You'd have to eat an institutional-sized jar of peanut butter as one serving in order to consume 0.5 grams of trans fat.
– David Hammen
6 hours ago
8
@jkej Actually, it’s not only similar, but identical: the reason in both cases is that the limit is ‘hard-coded’ at 0.5g regardless of percentual content. In both cases it leads to misleading labelling, it’s just much more misleading. Naturally, the situations are very different between the two, but the underlying reason is the same.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
6 hours ago
2
And if anyone is curious about the italicization: english.stackexchange.com/questions/170273/…
– Acccumulation
2 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
I note that the label says "Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil" not "Partially Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil". If the oil has been fully hydrogenated it no longer contains trans fats, by definition.
Unfortunately you can't know whether an oil has been fully or partially hydrogenated when the label omits those qualifiers. It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation. It would be wise to assume partial hydrogenation when "Fully" is absent.
A fully hydrogenated oil by itself will be solid at room temperature but I cannot say what would happen to an fully hydrogenated oil suspended in a matrix of peanut bits.
http://www.berkeleywellness.com/healthy-eating/food/article/hydrogenated-oils for more information on hydrogenation and health.
https://www.nationalpeanutboard.org/wellness/why-you-shouldnt-be-scared-oil-in-your-peanut-butter.htm for a highly biased take on the oils used in peanut butter across the industry.
New contributor
Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
"It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation." But partially hydrogenated oil typically consists of 30-40% trans fat and according to the study cited in David Hammen's answer, peanut butter typically contains 1-2% hydrogenated vegetable oil. That would give 0.3-0.8% trans fat in the peanut butter, but the study couldn't detect any trans fat (with a detection limit of 0.01%). So either it's fully hydrogenated, or they have some way of doing partial hydrogenation without producing trans fat.
– jkej
5 hours ago
So perhaps the marketing directive behind omitting the partial/full qualifier is "keep the ingredient list as short as possible".
– Timbo
5 hours ago
1
Interesting. JIF's labeling makes a point of stating that theirs is fully hydrogenated. Perhaps Skippy's is a blend of fully and partially.
– PoloHoleSet
2 hours ago
add a comment |
The FDA has determined that Partially Hydrogenated Oils are not Generally Recognized as Safe (or GRAS) and has established rules for their elimination from the US food supply:
https://www.fda.gov/food/ingredientspackaginglabeling/foodadditivesingredients/ucm449162.htm
If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods.
3
That's all well and good, but it doesn't answer the question of whether Skippy peanut butter contains trans fat or not.
– Mark
3 hours ago
True, but in some ways it does. The FDA order is 3 or 4 years old. Every manufacturer of food products has been working to remove to remove trans fats from their product recipes (trans fats are not natural, they are manufactured). If a manufacturer proclaims their product Trans Fat free on their web site, then it should be trans fat free. I wouldn't be surprised for the FDA to eventually make a rule saying that products can't say "trans fat free" - all products will meet that spec. I agree the accepted answer is correct. But, I thought this information was relevant (& more than a comment)
– Flydog57
2 hours ago
"Should be" isn't the same thing as "is". David Hammen's answer states that you can claim 0 grams of trans fat as long as there's less than 0.5 grams per serving.
– Mark
2 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.
Strictly speaking, according to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter contains a negligible amount of trans fat. Per the US FDA,
The Nutrition Facts Label can state 0 g of trans fat if the food product contains less than 0.5 g of trans fat per serving. Thus, if a product contains partially hydrogenated oils, then it might contain small amounts of trans fat even if the label says 0 g of trans fat.
So they're being sneaky, right? Not really. The amount of trans fat in a serving of peanut butter is far less than the limit of 0.5 grams that needs to be reported as above zero. Only a tiny amount of hydrogenated vegetable oil is added to peanut butter to make it smooth, prevent separation, and drastically increase shelf life, and only a small amount of that small amount is in the form of trans fat. While non-zero, the amount is essentially undetectable. From Sanders, T.H., 2001. Non-detectable levels of trans-fatty acids in peanut butter. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 49(5), pp.2349-2351,
The fatty acid composition of 11 brands of peanut butter and paste freshly prepared from roasted peanuts was analyzed with emphasis on isomeric trans-fatty acids. No trans-fatty acids were detected in any of the samples in an analytical system with a detection threshold of 0.01% of the sample weight. Hydrogenated vegetable oils are added to peanut butters at levels of 1--2% to prevent oil separation. Some hydrogenated vegetable oils are known to be sources of trans-fatty acids in the human diet. The addition of these products was not found to result in measurable amounts of trans-fatty acids in the peanut butters analyzed.
11
This is similar to the reason why Tic Tacs are labelled as sugar-free, despite consisting of almost nothing but sugar.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
7 hours ago
19
@JanusBahsJacquet I don't think it's remotely similar. The serving size for Tic Tacs is 0.49 g (1 mint) so it couldn't possibly be above 0.5 g sugar per serving, and it is in fact mostly sugar. That is an extreme example highlighting the problem with setting these limits relative to serving size, which is a somewhat arbitrary concept (who eats just one Tic Tac?) . For Skippy peanut butter on the other hand, the serving size is 32 g, so less than 0.5 g trans fat means less than ~1.5%, and the study linked to in this answer shows that actual levels are less than 0.01%.
– jkej
6 hours ago
11
@JanusBahsJacquet, No, it's very different. Tic Tacs are 91% sugar by weight, but since a Tic Tac "serving" is less than 1/2 gram, Tic Tacs have less than the reportable amount of anything. Peanut butter on the other hand contains less than 0.01% trans fat by weight. You'd have to eat an institutional-sized jar of peanut butter as one serving in order to consume 0.5 grams of trans fat.
– David Hammen
6 hours ago
8
@jkej Actually, it’s not only similar, but identical: the reason in both cases is that the limit is ‘hard-coded’ at 0.5g regardless of percentual content. In both cases it leads to misleading labelling, it’s just much more misleading. Naturally, the situations are very different between the two, but the underlying reason is the same.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
6 hours ago
2
And if anyone is curious about the italicization: english.stackexchange.com/questions/170273/…
– Acccumulation
2 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.
Strictly speaking, according to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter contains a negligible amount of trans fat. Per the US FDA,
The Nutrition Facts Label can state 0 g of trans fat if the food product contains less than 0.5 g of trans fat per serving. Thus, if a product contains partially hydrogenated oils, then it might contain small amounts of trans fat even if the label says 0 g of trans fat.
So they're being sneaky, right? Not really. The amount of trans fat in a serving of peanut butter is far less than the limit of 0.5 grams that needs to be reported as above zero. Only a tiny amount of hydrogenated vegetable oil is added to peanut butter to make it smooth, prevent separation, and drastically increase shelf life, and only a small amount of that small amount is in the form of trans fat. While non-zero, the amount is essentially undetectable. From Sanders, T.H., 2001. Non-detectable levels of trans-fatty acids in peanut butter. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 49(5), pp.2349-2351,
The fatty acid composition of 11 brands of peanut butter and paste freshly prepared from roasted peanuts was analyzed with emphasis on isomeric trans-fatty acids. No trans-fatty acids were detected in any of the samples in an analytical system with a detection threshold of 0.01% of the sample weight. Hydrogenated vegetable oils are added to peanut butters at levels of 1--2% to prevent oil separation. Some hydrogenated vegetable oils are known to be sources of trans-fatty acids in the human diet. The addition of these products was not found to result in measurable amounts of trans-fatty acids in the peanut butters analyzed.
11
This is similar to the reason why Tic Tacs are labelled as sugar-free, despite consisting of almost nothing but sugar.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
7 hours ago
19
@JanusBahsJacquet I don't think it's remotely similar. The serving size for Tic Tacs is 0.49 g (1 mint) so it couldn't possibly be above 0.5 g sugar per serving, and it is in fact mostly sugar. That is an extreme example highlighting the problem with setting these limits relative to serving size, which is a somewhat arbitrary concept (who eats just one Tic Tac?) . For Skippy peanut butter on the other hand, the serving size is 32 g, so less than 0.5 g trans fat means less than ~1.5%, and the study linked to in this answer shows that actual levels are less than 0.01%.
– jkej
6 hours ago
11
@JanusBahsJacquet, No, it's very different. Tic Tacs are 91% sugar by weight, but since a Tic Tac "serving" is less than 1/2 gram, Tic Tacs have less than the reportable amount of anything. Peanut butter on the other hand contains less than 0.01% trans fat by weight. You'd have to eat an institutional-sized jar of peanut butter as one serving in order to consume 0.5 grams of trans fat.
– David Hammen
6 hours ago
8
@jkej Actually, it’s not only similar, but identical: the reason in both cases is that the limit is ‘hard-coded’ at 0.5g regardless of percentual content. In both cases it leads to misleading labelling, it’s just much more misleading. Naturally, the situations are very different between the two, but the underlying reason is the same.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
6 hours ago
2
And if anyone is curious about the italicization: english.stackexchange.com/questions/170273/…
– Acccumulation
2 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.
Strictly speaking, according to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter contains a negligible amount of trans fat. Per the US FDA,
The Nutrition Facts Label can state 0 g of trans fat if the food product contains less than 0.5 g of trans fat per serving. Thus, if a product contains partially hydrogenated oils, then it might contain small amounts of trans fat even if the label says 0 g of trans fat.
So they're being sneaky, right? Not really. The amount of trans fat in a serving of peanut butter is far less than the limit of 0.5 grams that needs to be reported as above zero. Only a tiny amount of hydrogenated vegetable oil is added to peanut butter to make it smooth, prevent separation, and drastically increase shelf life, and only a small amount of that small amount is in the form of trans fat. While non-zero, the amount is essentially undetectable. From Sanders, T.H., 2001. Non-detectable levels of trans-fatty acids in peanut butter. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 49(5), pp.2349-2351,
The fatty acid composition of 11 brands of peanut butter and paste freshly prepared from roasted peanuts was analyzed with emphasis on isomeric trans-fatty acids. No trans-fatty acids were detected in any of the samples in an analytical system with a detection threshold of 0.01% of the sample weight. Hydrogenated vegetable oils are added to peanut butters at levels of 1--2% to prevent oil separation. Some hydrogenated vegetable oils are known to be sources of trans-fatty acids in the human diet. The addition of these products was not found to result in measurable amounts of trans-fatty acids in the peanut butters analyzed.
According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.
Strictly speaking, according to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter contains a negligible amount of trans fat. Per the US FDA,
The Nutrition Facts Label can state 0 g of trans fat if the food product contains less than 0.5 g of trans fat per serving. Thus, if a product contains partially hydrogenated oils, then it might contain small amounts of trans fat even if the label says 0 g of trans fat.
So they're being sneaky, right? Not really. The amount of trans fat in a serving of peanut butter is far less than the limit of 0.5 grams that needs to be reported as above zero. Only a tiny amount of hydrogenated vegetable oil is added to peanut butter to make it smooth, prevent separation, and drastically increase shelf life, and only a small amount of that small amount is in the form of trans fat. While non-zero, the amount is essentially undetectable. From Sanders, T.H., 2001. Non-detectable levels of trans-fatty acids in peanut butter. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 49(5), pp.2349-2351,
The fatty acid composition of 11 brands of peanut butter and paste freshly prepared from roasted peanuts was analyzed with emphasis on isomeric trans-fatty acids. No trans-fatty acids were detected in any of the samples in an analytical system with a detection threshold of 0.01% of the sample weight. Hydrogenated vegetable oils are added to peanut butters at levels of 1--2% to prevent oil separation. Some hydrogenated vegetable oils are known to be sources of trans-fatty acids in the human diet. The addition of these products was not found to result in measurable amounts of trans-fatty acids in the peanut butters analyzed.
answered 9 hours ago
David HammenDavid Hammen
6,35632730
6,35632730
11
This is similar to the reason why Tic Tacs are labelled as sugar-free, despite consisting of almost nothing but sugar.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
7 hours ago
19
@JanusBahsJacquet I don't think it's remotely similar. The serving size for Tic Tacs is 0.49 g (1 mint) so it couldn't possibly be above 0.5 g sugar per serving, and it is in fact mostly sugar. That is an extreme example highlighting the problem with setting these limits relative to serving size, which is a somewhat arbitrary concept (who eats just one Tic Tac?) . For Skippy peanut butter on the other hand, the serving size is 32 g, so less than 0.5 g trans fat means less than ~1.5%, and the study linked to in this answer shows that actual levels are less than 0.01%.
– jkej
6 hours ago
11
@JanusBahsJacquet, No, it's very different. Tic Tacs are 91% sugar by weight, but since a Tic Tac "serving" is less than 1/2 gram, Tic Tacs have less than the reportable amount of anything. Peanut butter on the other hand contains less than 0.01% trans fat by weight. You'd have to eat an institutional-sized jar of peanut butter as one serving in order to consume 0.5 grams of trans fat.
– David Hammen
6 hours ago
8
@jkej Actually, it’s not only similar, but identical: the reason in both cases is that the limit is ‘hard-coded’ at 0.5g regardless of percentual content. In both cases it leads to misleading labelling, it’s just much more misleading. Naturally, the situations are very different between the two, but the underlying reason is the same.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
6 hours ago
2
And if anyone is curious about the italicization: english.stackexchange.com/questions/170273/…
– Acccumulation
2 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
11
This is similar to the reason why Tic Tacs are labelled as sugar-free, despite consisting of almost nothing but sugar.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
7 hours ago
19
@JanusBahsJacquet I don't think it's remotely similar. The serving size for Tic Tacs is 0.49 g (1 mint) so it couldn't possibly be above 0.5 g sugar per serving, and it is in fact mostly sugar. That is an extreme example highlighting the problem with setting these limits relative to serving size, which is a somewhat arbitrary concept (who eats just one Tic Tac?) . For Skippy peanut butter on the other hand, the serving size is 32 g, so less than 0.5 g trans fat means less than ~1.5%, and the study linked to in this answer shows that actual levels are less than 0.01%.
– jkej
6 hours ago
11
@JanusBahsJacquet, No, it's very different. Tic Tacs are 91% sugar by weight, but since a Tic Tac "serving" is less than 1/2 gram, Tic Tacs have less than the reportable amount of anything. Peanut butter on the other hand contains less than 0.01% trans fat by weight. You'd have to eat an institutional-sized jar of peanut butter as one serving in order to consume 0.5 grams of trans fat.
– David Hammen
6 hours ago
8
@jkej Actually, it’s not only similar, but identical: the reason in both cases is that the limit is ‘hard-coded’ at 0.5g regardless of percentual content. In both cases it leads to misleading labelling, it’s just much more misleading. Naturally, the situations are very different between the two, but the underlying reason is the same.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
6 hours ago
2
And if anyone is curious about the italicization: english.stackexchange.com/questions/170273/…
– Acccumulation
2 hours ago
11
11
This is similar to the reason why Tic Tacs are labelled as sugar-free, despite consisting of almost nothing but sugar.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
7 hours ago
This is similar to the reason why Tic Tacs are labelled as sugar-free, despite consisting of almost nothing but sugar.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
7 hours ago
19
19
@JanusBahsJacquet I don't think it's remotely similar. The serving size for Tic Tacs is 0.49 g (1 mint) so it couldn't possibly be above 0.5 g sugar per serving, and it is in fact mostly sugar. That is an extreme example highlighting the problem with setting these limits relative to serving size, which is a somewhat arbitrary concept (who eats just one Tic Tac?) . For Skippy peanut butter on the other hand, the serving size is 32 g, so less than 0.5 g trans fat means less than ~1.5%, and the study linked to in this answer shows that actual levels are less than 0.01%.
– jkej
6 hours ago
@JanusBahsJacquet I don't think it's remotely similar. The serving size for Tic Tacs is 0.49 g (1 mint) so it couldn't possibly be above 0.5 g sugar per serving, and it is in fact mostly sugar. That is an extreme example highlighting the problem with setting these limits relative to serving size, which is a somewhat arbitrary concept (who eats just one Tic Tac?) . For Skippy peanut butter on the other hand, the serving size is 32 g, so less than 0.5 g trans fat means less than ~1.5%, and the study linked to in this answer shows that actual levels are less than 0.01%.
– jkej
6 hours ago
11
11
@JanusBahsJacquet, No, it's very different. Tic Tacs are 91% sugar by weight, but since a Tic Tac "serving" is less than 1/2 gram, Tic Tacs have less than the reportable amount of anything. Peanut butter on the other hand contains less than 0.01% trans fat by weight. You'd have to eat an institutional-sized jar of peanut butter as one serving in order to consume 0.5 grams of trans fat.
– David Hammen
6 hours ago
@JanusBahsJacquet, No, it's very different. Tic Tacs are 91% sugar by weight, but since a Tic Tac "serving" is less than 1/2 gram, Tic Tacs have less than the reportable amount of anything. Peanut butter on the other hand contains less than 0.01% trans fat by weight. You'd have to eat an institutional-sized jar of peanut butter as one serving in order to consume 0.5 grams of trans fat.
– David Hammen
6 hours ago
8
8
@jkej Actually, it’s not only similar, but identical: the reason in both cases is that the limit is ‘hard-coded’ at 0.5g regardless of percentual content. In both cases it leads to misleading labelling, it’s just much more misleading. Naturally, the situations are very different between the two, but the underlying reason is the same.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
6 hours ago
@jkej Actually, it’s not only similar, but identical: the reason in both cases is that the limit is ‘hard-coded’ at 0.5g regardless of percentual content. In both cases it leads to misleading labelling, it’s just much more misleading. Naturally, the situations are very different between the two, but the underlying reason is the same.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
6 hours ago
2
2
And if anyone is curious about the italicization: english.stackexchange.com/questions/170273/…
– Acccumulation
2 hours ago
And if anyone is curious about the italicization: english.stackexchange.com/questions/170273/…
– Acccumulation
2 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
I note that the label says "Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil" not "Partially Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil". If the oil has been fully hydrogenated it no longer contains trans fats, by definition.
Unfortunately you can't know whether an oil has been fully or partially hydrogenated when the label omits those qualifiers. It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation. It would be wise to assume partial hydrogenation when "Fully" is absent.
A fully hydrogenated oil by itself will be solid at room temperature but I cannot say what would happen to an fully hydrogenated oil suspended in a matrix of peanut bits.
http://www.berkeleywellness.com/healthy-eating/food/article/hydrogenated-oils for more information on hydrogenation and health.
https://www.nationalpeanutboard.org/wellness/why-you-shouldnt-be-scared-oil-in-your-peanut-butter.htm for a highly biased take on the oils used in peanut butter across the industry.
New contributor
Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
"It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation." But partially hydrogenated oil typically consists of 30-40% trans fat and according to the study cited in David Hammen's answer, peanut butter typically contains 1-2% hydrogenated vegetable oil. That would give 0.3-0.8% trans fat in the peanut butter, but the study couldn't detect any trans fat (with a detection limit of 0.01%). So either it's fully hydrogenated, or they have some way of doing partial hydrogenation without producing trans fat.
– jkej
5 hours ago
So perhaps the marketing directive behind omitting the partial/full qualifier is "keep the ingredient list as short as possible".
– Timbo
5 hours ago
1
Interesting. JIF's labeling makes a point of stating that theirs is fully hydrogenated. Perhaps Skippy's is a blend of fully and partially.
– PoloHoleSet
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I note that the label says "Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil" not "Partially Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil". If the oil has been fully hydrogenated it no longer contains trans fats, by definition.
Unfortunately you can't know whether an oil has been fully or partially hydrogenated when the label omits those qualifiers. It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation. It would be wise to assume partial hydrogenation when "Fully" is absent.
A fully hydrogenated oil by itself will be solid at room temperature but I cannot say what would happen to an fully hydrogenated oil suspended in a matrix of peanut bits.
http://www.berkeleywellness.com/healthy-eating/food/article/hydrogenated-oils for more information on hydrogenation and health.
https://www.nationalpeanutboard.org/wellness/why-you-shouldnt-be-scared-oil-in-your-peanut-butter.htm for a highly biased take on the oils used in peanut butter across the industry.
New contributor
Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
"It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation." But partially hydrogenated oil typically consists of 30-40% trans fat and according to the study cited in David Hammen's answer, peanut butter typically contains 1-2% hydrogenated vegetable oil. That would give 0.3-0.8% trans fat in the peanut butter, but the study couldn't detect any trans fat (with a detection limit of 0.01%). So either it's fully hydrogenated, or they have some way of doing partial hydrogenation without producing trans fat.
– jkej
5 hours ago
So perhaps the marketing directive behind omitting the partial/full qualifier is "keep the ingredient list as short as possible".
– Timbo
5 hours ago
1
Interesting. JIF's labeling makes a point of stating that theirs is fully hydrogenated. Perhaps Skippy's is a blend of fully and partially.
– PoloHoleSet
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I note that the label says "Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil" not "Partially Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil". If the oil has been fully hydrogenated it no longer contains trans fats, by definition.
Unfortunately you can't know whether an oil has been fully or partially hydrogenated when the label omits those qualifiers. It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation. It would be wise to assume partial hydrogenation when "Fully" is absent.
A fully hydrogenated oil by itself will be solid at room temperature but I cannot say what would happen to an fully hydrogenated oil suspended in a matrix of peanut bits.
http://www.berkeleywellness.com/healthy-eating/food/article/hydrogenated-oils for more information on hydrogenation and health.
https://www.nationalpeanutboard.org/wellness/why-you-shouldnt-be-scared-oil-in-your-peanut-butter.htm for a highly biased take on the oils used in peanut butter across the industry.
New contributor
Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I note that the label says "Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil" not "Partially Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil". If the oil has been fully hydrogenated it no longer contains trans fats, by definition.
Unfortunately you can't know whether an oil has been fully or partially hydrogenated when the label omits those qualifiers. It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation. It would be wise to assume partial hydrogenation when "Fully" is absent.
A fully hydrogenated oil by itself will be solid at room temperature but I cannot say what would happen to an fully hydrogenated oil suspended in a matrix of peanut bits.
http://www.berkeleywellness.com/healthy-eating/food/article/hydrogenated-oils for more information on hydrogenation and health.
https://www.nationalpeanutboard.org/wellness/why-you-shouldnt-be-scared-oil-in-your-peanut-butter.htm for a highly biased take on the oils used in peanut butter across the industry.
New contributor
Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 5 hours ago
TimboTimbo
1512
1512
New contributor
Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
"It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation." But partially hydrogenated oil typically consists of 30-40% trans fat and according to the study cited in David Hammen's answer, peanut butter typically contains 1-2% hydrogenated vegetable oil. That would give 0.3-0.8% trans fat in the peanut butter, but the study couldn't detect any trans fat (with a detection limit of 0.01%). So either it's fully hydrogenated, or they have some way of doing partial hydrogenation without producing trans fat.
– jkej
5 hours ago
So perhaps the marketing directive behind omitting the partial/full qualifier is "keep the ingredient list as short as possible".
– Timbo
5 hours ago
1
Interesting. JIF's labeling makes a point of stating that theirs is fully hydrogenated. Perhaps Skippy's is a blend of fully and partially.
– PoloHoleSet
2 hours ago
add a comment |
"It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation." But partially hydrogenated oil typically consists of 30-40% trans fat and according to the study cited in David Hammen's answer, peanut butter typically contains 1-2% hydrogenated vegetable oil. That would give 0.3-0.8% trans fat in the peanut butter, but the study couldn't detect any trans fat (with a detection limit of 0.01%). So either it's fully hydrogenated, or they have some way of doing partial hydrogenation without producing trans fat.
– jkej
5 hours ago
So perhaps the marketing directive behind omitting the partial/full qualifier is "keep the ingredient list as short as possible".
– Timbo
5 hours ago
1
Interesting. JIF's labeling makes a point of stating that theirs is fully hydrogenated. Perhaps Skippy's is a blend of fully and partially.
– PoloHoleSet
2 hours ago
"It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation." But partially hydrogenated oil typically consists of 30-40% trans fat and according to the study cited in David Hammen's answer, peanut butter typically contains 1-2% hydrogenated vegetable oil. That would give 0.3-0.8% trans fat in the peanut butter, but the study couldn't detect any trans fat (with a detection limit of 0.01%). So either it's fully hydrogenated, or they have some way of doing partial hydrogenation without producing trans fat.
– jkej
5 hours ago
"It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation." But partially hydrogenated oil typically consists of 30-40% trans fat and according to the study cited in David Hammen's answer, peanut butter typically contains 1-2% hydrogenated vegetable oil. That would give 0.3-0.8% trans fat in the peanut butter, but the study couldn't detect any trans fat (with a detection limit of 0.01%). So either it's fully hydrogenated, or they have some way of doing partial hydrogenation without producing trans fat.
– jkej
5 hours ago
So perhaps the marketing directive behind omitting the partial/full qualifier is "keep the ingredient list as short as possible".
– Timbo
5 hours ago
So perhaps the marketing directive behind omitting the partial/full qualifier is "keep the ingredient list as short as possible".
– Timbo
5 hours ago
1
1
Interesting. JIF's labeling makes a point of stating that theirs is fully hydrogenated. Perhaps Skippy's is a blend of fully and partially.
– PoloHoleSet
2 hours ago
Interesting. JIF's labeling makes a point of stating that theirs is fully hydrogenated. Perhaps Skippy's is a blend of fully and partially.
– PoloHoleSet
2 hours ago
add a comment |
The FDA has determined that Partially Hydrogenated Oils are not Generally Recognized as Safe (or GRAS) and has established rules for their elimination from the US food supply:
https://www.fda.gov/food/ingredientspackaginglabeling/foodadditivesingredients/ucm449162.htm
If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods.
3
That's all well and good, but it doesn't answer the question of whether Skippy peanut butter contains trans fat or not.
– Mark
3 hours ago
True, but in some ways it does. The FDA order is 3 or 4 years old. Every manufacturer of food products has been working to remove to remove trans fats from their product recipes (trans fats are not natural, they are manufactured). If a manufacturer proclaims their product Trans Fat free on their web site, then it should be trans fat free. I wouldn't be surprised for the FDA to eventually make a rule saying that products can't say "trans fat free" - all products will meet that spec. I agree the accepted answer is correct. But, I thought this information was relevant (& more than a comment)
– Flydog57
2 hours ago
"Should be" isn't the same thing as "is". David Hammen's answer states that you can claim 0 grams of trans fat as long as there's less than 0.5 grams per serving.
– Mark
2 hours ago
add a comment |
The FDA has determined that Partially Hydrogenated Oils are not Generally Recognized as Safe (or GRAS) and has established rules for their elimination from the US food supply:
https://www.fda.gov/food/ingredientspackaginglabeling/foodadditivesingredients/ucm449162.htm
If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods.
3
That's all well and good, but it doesn't answer the question of whether Skippy peanut butter contains trans fat or not.
– Mark
3 hours ago
True, but in some ways it does. The FDA order is 3 or 4 years old. Every manufacturer of food products has been working to remove to remove trans fats from their product recipes (trans fats are not natural, they are manufactured). If a manufacturer proclaims their product Trans Fat free on their web site, then it should be trans fat free. I wouldn't be surprised for the FDA to eventually make a rule saying that products can't say "trans fat free" - all products will meet that spec. I agree the accepted answer is correct. But, I thought this information was relevant (& more than a comment)
– Flydog57
2 hours ago
"Should be" isn't the same thing as "is". David Hammen's answer states that you can claim 0 grams of trans fat as long as there's less than 0.5 grams per serving.
– Mark
2 hours ago
add a comment |
The FDA has determined that Partially Hydrogenated Oils are not Generally Recognized as Safe (or GRAS) and has established rules for their elimination from the US food supply:
https://www.fda.gov/food/ingredientspackaginglabeling/foodadditivesingredients/ucm449162.htm
If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods.
The FDA has determined that Partially Hydrogenated Oils are not Generally Recognized as Safe (or GRAS) and has established rules for their elimination from the US food supply:
https://www.fda.gov/food/ingredientspackaginglabeling/foodadditivesingredients/ucm449162.htm
If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods.
edited 3 hours ago
Ted Delezene
1054
1054
answered 5 hours ago
Flydog57Flydog57
1193
1193
3
That's all well and good, but it doesn't answer the question of whether Skippy peanut butter contains trans fat or not.
– Mark
3 hours ago
True, but in some ways it does. The FDA order is 3 or 4 years old. Every manufacturer of food products has been working to remove to remove trans fats from their product recipes (trans fats are not natural, they are manufactured). If a manufacturer proclaims their product Trans Fat free on their web site, then it should be trans fat free. I wouldn't be surprised for the FDA to eventually make a rule saying that products can't say "trans fat free" - all products will meet that spec. I agree the accepted answer is correct. But, I thought this information was relevant (& more than a comment)
– Flydog57
2 hours ago
"Should be" isn't the same thing as "is". David Hammen's answer states that you can claim 0 grams of trans fat as long as there's less than 0.5 grams per serving.
– Mark
2 hours ago
add a comment |
3
That's all well and good, but it doesn't answer the question of whether Skippy peanut butter contains trans fat or not.
– Mark
3 hours ago
True, but in some ways it does. The FDA order is 3 or 4 years old. Every manufacturer of food products has been working to remove to remove trans fats from their product recipes (trans fats are not natural, they are manufactured). If a manufacturer proclaims their product Trans Fat free on their web site, then it should be trans fat free. I wouldn't be surprised for the FDA to eventually make a rule saying that products can't say "trans fat free" - all products will meet that spec. I agree the accepted answer is correct. But, I thought this information was relevant (& more than a comment)
– Flydog57
2 hours ago
"Should be" isn't the same thing as "is". David Hammen's answer states that you can claim 0 grams of trans fat as long as there's less than 0.5 grams per serving.
– Mark
2 hours ago
3
3
That's all well and good, but it doesn't answer the question of whether Skippy peanut butter contains trans fat or not.
– Mark
3 hours ago
That's all well and good, but it doesn't answer the question of whether Skippy peanut butter contains trans fat or not.
– Mark
3 hours ago
True, but in some ways it does. The FDA order is 3 or 4 years old. Every manufacturer of food products has been working to remove to remove trans fats from their product recipes (trans fats are not natural, they are manufactured). If a manufacturer proclaims their product Trans Fat free on their web site, then it should be trans fat free. I wouldn't be surprised for the FDA to eventually make a rule saying that products can't say "trans fat free" - all products will meet that spec. I agree the accepted answer is correct. But, I thought this information was relevant (& more than a comment)
– Flydog57
2 hours ago
True, but in some ways it does. The FDA order is 3 or 4 years old. Every manufacturer of food products has been working to remove to remove trans fats from their product recipes (trans fats are not natural, they are manufactured). If a manufacturer proclaims their product Trans Fat free on their web site, then it should be trans fat free. I wouldn't be surprised for the FDA to eventually make a rule saying that products can't say "trans fat free" - all products will meet that spec. I agree the accepted answer is correct. But, I thought this information was relevant (& more than a comment)
– Flydog57
2 hours ago
"Should be" isn't the same thing as "is". David Hammen's answer states that you can claim 0 grams of trans fat as long as there's less than 0.5 grams per serving.
– Mark
2 hours ago
"Should be" isn't the same thing as "is". David Hammen's answer states that you can claim 0 grams of trans fat as long as there's less than 0.5 grams per serving.
– Mark
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Could it be that local law allows "...has zero grams per serving." meaning "...has less than one gram per serving."?
– npst
10 hours ago