Why is one not obligated to give up his life rather than violate Lashon Hara?Purim and Shushan PurimHyperbole...

Why do all the books in Game of Thrones library have their covers facing the back of the shelf?

Not a Long-Winded Riddle

Subsurf on a crown. How can I smooth some edges and keep others sharp?

Is `Object` a function in javascript?

Does Skippy chunky peanut butter contain trans fat?

Cat is tipping over bed-side lamps during the night

Why do we have to make "peinlich" start with a capital letter and also end with -s in this sentence?

What species should be used for storage of human minds?

How does Leonard in "Memento" remember reading and writing?

Square Root Distance from Integers

Non-Cancer terminal illness that can affect young (age 10-13) girls?

Why did Luke use his left hand to shoot?

When Are Enum Values Defined?

When obtaining gender reassignment/plastic surgery overseas, is an emergency travel document required to return home?

Why didn't the 2019 Oscars have a host?

Why avoid shared user accounts?

Can the "Friends" spell be used without making the target hostile?

Why is the "Domain users" group missing from this Powershell AD Query?

Why is it that Bernie Sanders is always called a "socialist"?

The No-Straight Maze

Am I correct in stating that the study of topology is purely theoretical?

What does an unprocessed RAW file look like?

How would an AI self awareness kill switch work?

How vim overwrites readonly mode?



Why is one not obligated to give up his life rather than violate Lashon Hara?



Purim and Shushan PurimHyperbole in the Gemara?Does calling someone by a nickname remove one's share in the world to come?Can one allow lashon hara to be said about oneself?Lashon Hara about someone you do not know?Lashon Hara about one of a groupDoes the Midrash imply that one should give up his life for “smaller” mitzvos?Why must one give up his life to avoid idolatry, according to Rashi?Why is one obligated to give up one’s life for all mitzvos only with a decree against Judaism and not just persecution?












3















The Gemara in Erchin 15b compares Lashon Hara to the Big Three:




תנא דבי רבי ישמעאל כל המספר לשון הרע מגדיל עונות כנגד שלש עבירות עבודת כוכבים וגילוי עריות ושפיכות דמים כתיב הכא לשון מדברת גדולות וכתיב בעבודת כוכבים (שמות לב, לא) אנא חטא העם הזה חטאה גדולה בגילוי עריות כתיב (בראשית לט, ט) ואיך אעשה הרעה הגדולה הזאת בשפיכות דמים כתיב (בראשית ד, יג) גדול עוני מנשוא גדולות אימא תרתי הי מינייהו מפקא



The Academy of R' Yishmael taught: Anyone who speaks Lashon Hara, his sins are expanded to be comparable to three sins: idolatry, immorality, and murder. It is written here [by Lashon Hara] (Tehillim 12:4), "A tongue speaks great things," and it is written by idolatry (Shemos 32:31), "Please, this nation has sinned a great sin." By immorality it is written (Bereishis 39:9), "And how can I do this great evil thing?" By murder it is written (Bereishis 4:13), "Is my sin too great to bear?" [Asks the Gemara:] I might say, "great things" [indicates] two [and not three]! [The Gemara answers:] Which of them will you remove?




The Gemara in Sanhedrin 74a rules:




כל עבירות שבתורה אם אומרין לאדם עבור ואל תהרג יעבור ואל יהרג חוץ מעבודת כוכבים וגילוי עריות ושפיכות דמים



All sins in the Torah, if they say to a person, "Violate and you will not be killed," he should violate and not be killed, except for idolatry, immorality, and murder.




If Lashon Hara is compared to these three sins, why isn't one obligated to give up his life for Lashon Hara (under normal circumstances)?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Related, but perhaps not quite a duplicate: judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/45501/…

    – Alex
    7 hours ago











  • Where's the question we have about embarrassing someone or giving up you life?

    – Double AA
    4 hours ago













  • @Alex why isn't it one?

    – רבות מחשבות
    1 hour ago











  • @רבותמחשבות One could perhaps argue that the other question is specifically asking if the statement is literal, while this question is assuming it's literal and asking why the halachic consequence doesn't follow through.

    – Alex
    1 hour ago











  • Possible duplicate of Hyperbole in the Gemara?

    – רבות מחשבות
    1 hour ago
















3















The Gemara in Erchin 15b compares Lashon Hara to the Big Three:




תנא דבי רבי ישמעאל כל המספר לשון הרע מגדיל עונות כנגד שלש עבירות עבודת כוכבים וגילוי עריות ושפיכות דמים כתיב הכא לשון מדברת גדולות וכתיב בעבודת כוכבים (שמות לב, לא) אנא חטא העם הזה חטאה גדולה בגילוי עריות כתיב (בראשית לט, ט) ואיך אעשה הרעה הגדולה הזאת בשפיכות דמים כתיב (בראשית ד, יג) גדול עוני מנשוא גדולות אימא תרתי הי מינייהו מפקא



The Academy of R' Yishmael taught: Anyone who speaks Lashon Hara, his sins are expanded to be comparable to three sins: idolatry, immorality, and murder. It is written here [by Lashon Hara] (Tehillim 12:4), "A tongue speaks great things," and it is written by idolatry (Shemos 32:31), "Please, this nation has sinned a great sin." By immorality it is written (Bereishis 39:9), "And how can I do this great evil thing?" By murder it is written (Bereishis 4:13), "Is my sin too great to bear?" [Asks the Gemara:] I might say, "great things" [indicates] two [and not three]! [The Gemara answers:] Which of them will you remove?




The Gemara in Sanhedrin 74a rules:




כל עבירות שבתורה אם אומרין לאדם עבור ואל תהרג יעבור ואל יהרג חוץ מעבודת כוכבים וגילוי עריות ושפיכות דמים



All sins in the Torah, if they say to a person, "Violate and you will not be killed," he should violate and not be killed, except for idolatry, immorality, and murder.




If Lashon Hara is compared to these three sins, why isn't one obligated to give up his life for Lashon Hara (under normal circumstances)?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Related, but perhaps not quite a duplicate: judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/45501/…

    – Alex
    7 hours ago











  • Where's the question we have about embarrassing someone or giving up you life?

    – Double AA
    4 hours ago













  • @Alex why isn't it one?

    – רבות מחשבות
    1 hour ago











  • @רבותמחשבות One could perhaps argue that the other question is specifically asking if the statement is literal, while this question is assuming it's literal and asking why the halachic consequence doesn't follow through.

    – Alex
    1 hour ago











  • Possible duplicate of Hyperbole in the Gemara?

    – רבות מחשבות
    1 hour ago














3












3








3








The Gemara in Erchin 15b compares Lashon Hara to the Big Three:




תנא דבי רבי ישמעאל כל המספר לשון הרע מגדיל עונות כנגד שלש עבירות עבודת כוכבים וגילוי עריות ושפיכות דמים כתיב הכא לשון מדברת גדולות וכתיב בעבודת כוכבים (שמות לב, לא) אנא חטא העם הזה חטאה גדולה בגילוי עריות כתיב (בראשית לט, ט) ואיך אעשה הרעה הגדולה הזאת בשפיכות דמים כתיב (בראשית ד, יג) גדול עוני מנשוא גדולות אימא תרתי הי מינייהו מפקא



The Academy of R' Yishmael taught: Anyone who speaks Lashon Hara, his sins are expanded to be comparable to three sins: idolatry, immorality, and murder. It is written here [by Lashon Hara] (Tehillim 12:4), "A tongue speaks great things," and it is written by idolatry (Shemos 32:31), "Please, this nation has sinned a great sin." By immorality it is written (Bereishis 39:9), "And how can I do this great evil thing?" By murder it is written (Bereishis 4:13), "Is my sin too great to bear?" [Asks the Gemara:] I might say, "great things" [indicates] two [and not three]! [The Gemara answers:] Which of them will you remove?




The Gemara in Sanhedrin 74a rules:




כל עבירות שבתורה אם אומרין לאדם עבור ואל תהרג יעבור ואל יהרג חוץ מעבודת כוכבים וגילוי עריות ושפיכות דמים



All sins in the Torah, if they say to a person, "Violate and you will not be killed," he should violate and not be killed, except for idolatry, immorality, and murder.




If Lashon Hara is compared to these three sins, why isn't one obligated to give up his life for Lashon Hara (under normal circumstances)?










share|improve this question














The Gemara in Erchin 15b compares Lashon Hara to the Big Three:




תנא דבי רבי ישמעאל כל המספר לשון הרע מגדיל עונות כנגד שלש עבירות עבודת כוכבים וגילוי עריות ושפיכות דמים כתיב הכא לשון מדברת גדולות וכתיב בעבודת כוכבים (שמות לב, לא) אנא חטא העם הזה חטאה גדולה בגילוי עריות כתיב (בראשית לט, ט) ואיך אעשה הרעה הגדולה הזאת בשפיכות דמים כתיב (בראשית ד, יג) גדול עוני מנשוא גדולות אימא תרתי הי מינייהו מפקא



The Academy of R' Yishmael taught: Anyone who speaks Lashon Hara, his sins are expanded to be comparable to three sins: idolatry, immorality, and murder. It is written here [by Lashon Hara] (Tehillim 12:4), "A tongue speaks great things," and it is written by idolatry (Shemos 32:31), "Please, this nation has sinned a great sin." By immorality it is written (Bereishis 39:9), "And how can I do this great evil thing?" By murder it is written (Bereishis 4:13), "Is my sin too great to bear?" [Asks the Gemara:] I might say, "great things" [indicates] two [and not three]! [The Gemara answers:] Which of them will you remove?




The Gemara in Sanhedrin 74a rules:




כל עבירות שבתורה אם אומרין לאדם עבור ואל תהרג יעבור ואל יהרג חוץ מעבודת כוכבים וגילוי עריות ושפיכות דמים



All sins in the Torah, if they say to a person, "Violate and you will not be killed," he should violate and not be killed, except for idolatry, immorality, and murder.




If Lashon Hara is compared to these three sins, why isn't one obligated to give up his life for Lashon Hara (under normal circumstances)?







pikuachnefesh-danger-life maseches-sanhedrin lashon-hara-slander arachin-tractate






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









DonielFDonielF

13.9k12378




13.9k12378








  • 1





    Related, but perhaps not quite a duplicate: judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/45501/…

    – Alex
    7 hours ago











  • Where's the question we have about embarrassing someone or giving up you life?

    – Double AA
    4 hours ago













  • @Alex why isn't it one?

    – רבות מחשבות
    1 hour ago











  • @רבותמחשבות One could perhaps argue that the other question is specifically asking if the statement is literal, while this question is assuming it's literal and asking why the halachic consequence doesn't follow through.

    – Alex
    1 hour ago











  • Possible duplicate of Hyperbole in the Gemara?

    – רבות מחשבות
    1 hour ago














  • 1





    Related, but perhaps not quite a duplicate: judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/45501/…

    – Alex
    7 hours ago











  • Where's the question we have about embarrassing someone or giving up you life?

    – Double AA
    4 hours ago













  • @Alex why isn't it one?

    – רבות מחשבות
    1 hour ago











  • @רבותמחשבות One could perhaps argue that the other question is specifically asking if the statement is literal, while this question is assuming it's literal and asking why the halachic consequence doesn't follow through.

    – Alex
    1 hour ago











  • Possible duplicate of Hyperbole in the Gemara?

    – רבות מחשבות
    1 hour ago








1




1





Related, but perhaps not quite a duplicate: judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/45501/…

– Alex
7 hours ago





Related, but perhaps not quite a duplicate: judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/45501/…

– Alex
7 hours ago













Where's the question we have about embarrassing someone or giving up you life?

– Double AA
4 hours ago







Where's the question we have about embarrassing someone or giving up you life?

– Double AA
4 hours ago















@Alex why isn't it one?

– רבות מחשבות
1 hour ago





@Alex why isn't it one?

– רבות מחשבות
1 hour ago













@רבותמחשבות One could perhaps argue that the other question is specifically asking if the statement is literal, while this question is assuming it's literal and asking why the halachic consequence doesn't follow through.

– Alex
1 hour ago





@רבותמחשבות One could perhaps argue that the other question is specifically asking if the statement is literal, while this question is assuming it's literal and asking why the halachic consequence doesn't follow through.

– Alex
1 hour ago













Possible duplicate of Hyperbole in the Gemara?

– רבות מחשבות
1 hour ago





Possible duplicate of Hyperbole in the Gemara?

– רבות מחשבות
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














As I noted in my answer to a very similar question, R. Isaac Ben Sheshet has a responsum in which he asserts that the Sages often exaggerated the severity of sins in order to prevent people from stumbling in them. He specifically gives this Talmudic passage about lashon harah as an example of such an exaggeration:



Shu"t HaRivash # 171




ומה שאמרת שהגאונים והרשב"א ז"ל כתבו שהעובר על החרמים והשבועות הוא בכלל לא ינקה והיינו כעובד ע"ג דכתיב בה ולא ידבק בידך מאומה מן החרם ע"כ אם הפליגו להגדיל העון ההוא כמו שעשו חז"ל שאמרו שבכל עברות שבתורה נאמר בהן ונקה וכאן לא ינקה וכן שנפרעין ממנו ומכל העולם לא אמרו בו שיהרג ואל יעבור כמו באותן ג' עברות וזה לא עלה על דעת שום אדם ולא חשב אנוש אלא שדרך החכמים להפליג בהגדלת העונות כדי שישמר אדם מהכשל בהן אמרו בפ' יש בערכין כל המספר לשון הרע מגדיל עונות כנגד שלש עברות ע"ג וגלוי עריות ושפיכות דמים וכו' וכן במס' נדרים יצא ר' עקיבא ודרש כל שאינו מבקר את החולה כאלו שופך דמים ובפ' ר"א דאורג אמרו הקורע בגדיו בחמתו וכו' יהיה בעיניך כעובד ע"ג היאמר אדם באלו וכיוצא בהם יהרג ואל יעבור הא ליכא למימר




Thus, one is not obligated to give up his life rather than transgress lashon harah because the comparison to the three sins for which one does have to give up his life was just an exaggeration.






share|improve this answer
























  • What's the criteria to determine whether some particular passage is an exaggeration or not? For example, here, how do we know that the passage in Sanhedrin 74 is not an exaggeration?

    – user9806
    7 hours ago











  • @user9806 Great question! You may want to ask it.

    – Alex
    7 hours ago











  • 1. If this is an exaggeration, then why does the Gemara ask about comparing it to just two of them instead of all three? 2. Consider Avos d'Rebbi Nassan 40:1, which takes this even further: ארבעה דברים אדם העושה אותן נפרעין ממנו בעולם הזה ולעולם הבא: עבודת כוכבים וגילוי עריות ושפיכות דמים ולשון הרע יותר מכולם. Both the wording in Erchin and the wording in AdR"N don't seem to lend themselves to exaggeration.

    – DonielF
    7 hours ago











  • 3. FWIW the Rambam in Teshuvah 3:6 seems to disagree with this, counting Lashon Hara in the list of things which one loses his Olam Haba, rather than in 3:14 with the things Chazal exaggerated by describing them as such.

    – DonielF
    7 hours ago











  • @DonielF See what Rambam wrote in his Commentary to the Mishnah in Sanhedrin, right before he lists the thirteen principles, which I cited at the end of this answer.

    – Alex
    6 hours ago





















3














Rav Chaim Kanievsky (Doleh U'Maskeh pg.263) was asked this question. He answered that lashon harah is a very grave sin, but one is not chayav misah. In footnote 29 the Orchos Tzadikim shaar Lashon Harah is brought as a source. The Orchos Tzadikim explains why lashon harah is equated with the big 3 sins. See also Shaarei Teshuvah 3:202.



Orchos Tzadikim (Sefaria translation):




Our Rabbis, of blessed memory, said, "If one speaks gossip, it is as though he denied God" (Arakin 15b, and see T.P. Peah, 1:1). As it is said (Ps. 12:15), "Who have said : 'Our tongue will we make mighty : our lips are with us : who is lord over us?' " (Arakin 16b, and see T.P. Peah, 1:1). And therefore our Sages considered him as though he denied God, for he does a great evil to his companion, by making him odious in the eyes of the people and causing him other losses, though he himself derives no profit out of this. There is no doubt that one who makes a habit of speaking gossip has thrown off the yoke of Heaven from upon him, for he sins without any benefit to himself, and he is worse than a thief or an adulterer, for they pursue after their pleasure (Shohar Tov, 120:3). And there is no throwing off the yoke of Heaven as bad as when one deals in gossip. Our Sages further said, "The sin of gossip is weighed equally with the sin of idolatry and sexual immorality and bloodshed" (Arakin 15b). Now it is very astonishing that gossip should be equated with these sins, which are those to avoid which a man must rather let himself be killed than transgress (Sanh. 74a). And they said, "The sin of idolatry is so great that anyone who confesses to it, it is as though he denied the whole Torah" (Hullin 5a). And they said, "One who lusts after any form of idolatry, is a rebel against the whole Torah" (Hullin 4b).



And it is important to give the full meaning in this matter, for a gossip repeats his folly; ten times or more every day he humiliates and shames people, aside from the damage that he does to the one that he speaks against. And even a small transgression, when done many times, becomes great, just as although a single hair is soft and very weak, if you gather many hairs together, you can make of them a strong rope. And when they said that gossip is on a scale with those three mortal sins, they referred to one who commits any of these sins once, because of great temptation, but not to one who is such a complete apostate that he has excluded himself from the people of Israel, in order to commit these sins repeatedly. Moreover, a gossip finds it difficult to repent, because he is used to this habit and has taught his tongue to speak evil. Furthermore, this sin appears very light in his eyes, for he says, "I did not do anything — it was just talk." He does not consider the great damage he does, and therefore he does not repent. And even if he should repent, his repentance is not complete, for he does not realize the enormity of the sin which he has committed. Moreover, he must first obtain forgiveness from those against whom he has spoken, and he cannot remember whom they all are. And it may happen that he spoke against a man, and did him evil, and caused him harm and forgot what it was that he said about that man, for gossip is always covered up; it is a blow struck in secret. The gossiper is here and smites with his tongue a person who is far away from him (Arakin 15b, Gen. Rabbah 98:19). And this type of sinner is ashamed to let his victim know that he has done him evil. Sometimes he speaks about a defect in the family of the object of his gossip, thus injuring the generations that come after him, and there is no forgiveness for this, for our Sages said, "For one who speaks about a flaw in a family, there is no forgiveness eternally" (T.P. Baba Kamma 8:10).




enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • So, you’re saying that, according to Rav Chaim, one must be חייב מיתה for יהרג ואל יעבור to apply? Why does one give up his life for חלול השם, then? Also, am I reading the Orchos Tzadikim correctly as equating Lashon Hara over time with any of the Big Three done once, rather than 1:1?

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago













  • That's the lashon Rav Chaim answered, I think he is explaining that lashon harah on its own is never chayav misa. I do believe that reading of the Orchos tzadikim is corrrect.

    – sam
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Do you have an online link to Doleh U’Mashkeh that I could see it inside?

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago











  • I think that Rav Chaim is saying that in order to be in yarog vaal yavor it would need to be an aveirah which carries the death penalty which lashon haraah does not. However,it is compared to the big three and the OT explains why.

    – sam
    4 hours ago











  • Still doesn’t explain why one gives up his life for חילול השם

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago



















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














As I noted in my answer to a very similar question, R. Isaac Ben Sheshet has a responsum in which he asserts that the Sages often exaggerated the severity of sins in order to prevent people from stumbling in them. He specifically gives this Talmudic passage about lashon harah as an example of such an exaggeration:



Shu"t HaRivash # 171




ומה שאמרת שהגאונים והרשב"א ז"ל כתבו שהעובר על החרמים והשבועות הוא בכלל לא ינקה והיינו כעובד ע"ג דכתיב בה ולא ידבק בידך מאומה מן החרם ע"כ אם הפליגו להגדיל העון ההוא כמו שעשו חז"ל שאמרו שבכל עברות שבתורה נאמר בהן ונקה וכאן לא ינקה וכן שנפרעין ממנו ומכל העולם לא אמרו בו שיהרג ואל יעבור כמו באותן ג' עברות וזה לא עלה על דעת שום אדם ולא חשב אנוש אלא שדרך החכמים להפליג בהגדלת העונות כדי שישמר אדם מהכשל בהן אמרו בפ' יש בערכין כל המספר לשון הרע מגדיל עונות כנגד שלש עברות ע"ג וגלוי עריות ושפיכות דמים וכו' וכן במס' נדרים יצא ר' עקיבא ודרש כל שאינו מבקר את החולה כאלו שופך דמים ובפ' ר"א דאורג אמרו הקורע בגדיו בחמתו וכו' יהיה בעיניך כעובד ע"ג היאמר אדם באלו וכיוצא בהם יהרג ואל יעבור הא ליכא למימר




Thus, one is not obligated to give up his life rather than transgress lashon harah because the comparison to the three sins for which one does have to give up his life was just an exaggeration.






share|improve this answer
























  • What's the criteria to determine whether some particular passage is an exaggeration or not? For example, here, how do we know that the passage in Sanhedrin 74 is not an exaggeration?

    – user9806
    7 hours ago











  • @user9806 Great question! You may want to ask it.

    – Alex
    7 hours ago











  • 1. If this is an exaggeration, then why does the Gemara ask about comparing it to just two of them instead of all three? 2. Consider Avos d'Rebbi Nassan 40:1, which takes this even further: ארבעה דברים אדם העושה אותן נפרעין ממנו בעולם הזה ולעולם הבא: עבודת כוכבים וגילוי עריות ושפיכות דמים ולשון הרע יותר מכולם. Both the wording in Erchin and the wording in AdR"N don't seem to lend themselves to exaggeration.

    – DonielF
    7 hours ago











  • 3. FWIW the Rambam in Teshuvah 3:6 seems to disagree with this, counting Lashon Hara in the list of things which one loses his Olam Haba, rather than in 3:14 with the things Chazal exaggerated by describing them as such.

    – DonielF
    7 hours ago











  • @DonielF See what Rambam wrote in his Commentary to the Mishnah in Sanhedrin, right before he lists the thirteen principles, which I cited at the end of this answer.

    – Alex
    6 hours ago


















5














As I noted in my answer to a very similar question, R. Isaac Ben Sheshet has a responsum in which he asserts that the Sages often exaggerated the severity of sins in order to prevent people from stumbling in them. He specifically gives this Talmudic passage about lashon harah as an example of such an exaggeration:



Shu"t HaRivash # 171




ומה שאמרת שהגאונים והרשב"א ז"ל כתבו שהעובר על החרמים והשבועות הוא בכלל לא ינקה והיינו כעובד ע"ג דכתיב בה ולא ידבק בידך מאומה מן החרם ע"כ אם הפליגו להגדיל העון ההוא כמו שעשו חז"ל שאמרו שבכל עברות שבתורה נאמר בהן ונקה וכאן לא ינקה וכן שנפרעין ממנו ומכל העולם לא אמרו בו שיהרג ואל יעבור כמו באותן ג' עברות וזה לא עלה על דעת שום אדם ולא חשב אנוש אלא שדרך החכמים להפליג בהגדלת העונות כדי שישמר אדם מהכשל בהן אמרו בפ' יש בערכין כל המספר לשון הרע מגדיל עונות כנגד שלש עברות ע"ג וגלוי עריות ושפיכות דמים וכו' וכן במס' נדרים יצא ר' עקיבא ודרש כל שאינו מבקר את החולה כאלו שופך דמים ובפ' ר"א דאורג אמרו הקורע בגדיו בחמתו וכו' יהיה בעיניך כעובד ע"ג היאמר אדם באלו וכיוצא בהם יהרג ואל יעבור הא ליכא למימר




Thus, one is not obligated to give up his life rather than transgress lashon harah because the comparison to the three sins for which one does have to give up his life was just an exaggeration.






share|improve this answer
























  • What's the criteria to determine whether some particular passage is an exaggeration or not? For example, here, how do we know that the passage in Sanhedrin 74 is not an exaggeration?

    – user9806
    7 hours ago











  • @user9806 Great question! You may want to ask it.

    – Alex
    7 hours ago











  • 1. If this is an exaggeration, then why does the Gemara ask about comparing it to just two of them instead of all three? 2. Consider Avos d'Rebbi Nassan 40:1, which takes this even further: ארבעה דברים אדם העושה אותן נפרעין ממנו בעולם הזה ולעולם הבא: עבודת כוכבים וגילוי עריות ושפיכות דמים ולשון הרע יותר מכולם. Both the wording in Erchin and the wording in AdR"N don't seem to lend themselves to exaggeration.

    – DonielF
    7 hours ago











  • 3. FWIW the Rambam in Teshuvah 3:6 seems to disagree with this, counting Lashon Hara in the list of things which one loses his Olam Haba, rather than in 3:14 with the things Chazal exaggerated by describing them as such.

    – DonielF
    7 hours ago











  • @DonielF See what Rambam wrote in his Commentary to the Mishnah in Sanhedrin, right before he lists the thirteen principles, which I cited at the end of this answer.

    – Alex
    6 hours ago
















5












5








5







As I noted in my answer to a very similar question, R. Isaac Ben Sheshet has a responsum in which he asserts that the Sages often exaggerated the severity of sins in order to prevent people from stumbling in them. He specifically gives this Talmudic passage about lashon harah as an example of such an exaggeration:



Shu"t HaRivash # 171




ומה שאמרת שהגאונים והרשב"א ז"ל כתבו שהעובר על החרמים והשבועות הוא בכלל לא ינקה והיינו כעובד ע"ג דכתיב בה ולא ידבק בידך מאומה מן החרם ע"כ אם הפליגו להגדיל העון ההוא כמו שעשו חז"ל שאמרו שבכל עברות שבתורה נאמר בהן ונקה וכאן לא ינקה וכן שנפרעין ממנו ומכל העולם לא אמרו בו שיהרג ואל יעבור כמו באותן ג' עברות וזה לא עלה על דעת שום אדם ולא חשב אנוש אלא שדרך החכמים להפליג בהגדלת העונות כדי שישמר אדם מהכשל בהן אמרו בפ' יש בערכין כל המספר לשון הרע מגדיל עונות כנגד שלש עברות ע"ג וגלוי עריות ושפיכות דמים וכו' וכן במס' נדרים יצא ר' עקיבא ודרש כל שאינו מבקר את החולה כאלו שופך דמים ובפ' ר"א דאורג אמרו הקורע בגדיו בחמתו וכו' יהיה בעיניך כעובד ע"ג היאמר אדם באלו וכיוצא בהם יהרג ואל יעבור הא ליכא למימר




Thus, one is not obligated to give up his life rather than transgress lashon harah because the comparison to the three sins for which one does have to give up his life was just an exaggeration.






share|improve this answer













As I noted in my answer to a very similar question, R. Isaac Ben Sheshet has a responsum in which he asserts that the Sages often exaggerated the severity of sins in order to prevent people from stumbling in them. He specifically gives this Talmudic passage about lashon harah as an example of such an exaggeration:



Shu"t HaRivash # 171




ומה שאמרת שהגאונים והרשב"א ז"ל כתבו שהעובר על החרמים והשבועות הוא בכלל לא ינקה והיינו כעובד ע"ג דכתיב בה ולא ידבק בידך מאומה מן החרם ע"כ אם הפליגו להגדיל העון ההוא כמו שעשו חז"ל שאמרו שבכל עברות שבתורה נאמר בהן ונקה וכאן לא ינקה וכן שנפרעין ממנו ומכל העולם לא אמרו בו שיהרג ואל יעבור כמו באותן ג' עברות וזה לא עלה על דעת שום אדם ולא חשב אנוש אלא שדרך החכמים להפליג בהגדלת העונות כדי שישמר אדם מהכשל בהן אמרו בפ' יש בערכין כל המספר לשון הרע מגדיל עונות כנגד שלש עברות ע"ג וגלוי עריות ושפיכות דמים וכו' וכן במס' נדרים יצא ר' עקיבא ודרש כל שאינו מבקר את החולה כאלו שופך דמים ובפ' ר"א דאורג אמרו הקורע בגדיו בחמתו וכו' יהיה בעיניך כעובד ע"ג היאמר אדם באלו וכיוצא בהם יהרג ואל יעבור הא ליכא למימר




Thus, one is not obligated to give up his life rather than transgress lashon harah because the comparison to the three sins for which one does have to give up his life was just an exaggeration.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 7 hours ago









AlexAlex

21.1k153125




21.1k153125













  • What's the criteria to determine whether some particular passage is an exaggeration or not? For example, here, how do we know that the passage in Sanhedrin 74 is not an exaggeration?

    – user9806
    7 hours ago











  • @user9806 Great question! You may want to ask it.

    – Alex
    7 hours ago











  • 1. If this is an exaggeration, then why does the Gemara ask about comparing it to just two of them instead of all three? 2. Consider Avos d'Rebbi Nassan 40:1, which takes this even further: ארבעה דברים אדם העושה אותן נפרעין ממנו בעולם הזה ולעולם הבא: עבודת כוכבים וגילוי עריות ושפיכות דמים ולשון הרע יותר מכולם. Both the wording in Erchin and the wording in AdR"N don't seem to lend themselves to exaggeration.

    – DonielF
    7 hours ago











  • 3. FWIW the Rambam in Teshuvah 3:6 seems to disagree with this, counting Lashon Hara in the list of things which one loses his Olam Haba, rather than in 3:14 with the things Chazal exaggerated by describing them as such.

    – DonielF
    7 hours ago











  • @DonielF See what Rambam wrote in his Commentary to the Mishnah in Sanhedrin, right before he lists the thirteen principles, which I cited at the end of this answer.

    – Alex
    6 hours ago





















  • What's the criteria to determine whether some particular passage is an exaggeration or not? For example, here, how do we know that the passage in Sanhedrin 74 is not an exaggeration?

    – user9806
    7 hours ago











  • @user9806 Great question! You may want to ask it.

    – Alex
    7 hours ago











  • 1. If this is an exaggeration, then why does the Gemara ask about comparing it to just two of them instead of all three? 2. Consider Avos d'Rebbi Nassan 40:1, which takes this even further: ארבעה דברים אדם העושה אותן נפרעין ממנו בעולם הזה ולעולם הבא: עבודת כוכבים וגילוי עריות ושפיכות דמים ולשון הרע יותר מכולם. Both the wording in Erchin and the wording in AdR"N don't seem to lend themselves to exaggeration.

    – DonielF
    7 hours ago











  • 3. FWIW the Rambam in Teshuvah 3:6 seems to disagree with this, counting Lashon Hara in the list of things which one loses his Olam Haba, rather than in 3:14 with the things Chazal exaggerated by describing them as such.

    – DonielF
    7 hours ago











  • @DonielF See what Rambam wrote in his Commentary to the Mishnah in Sanhedrin, right before he lists the thirteen principles, which I cited at the end of this answer.

    – Alex
    6 hours ago



















What's the criteria to determine whether some particular passage is an exaggeration or not? For example, here, how do we know that the passage in Sanhedrin 74 is not an exaggeration?

– user9806
7 hours ago





What's the criteria to determine whether some particular passage is an exaggeration or not? For example, here, how do we know that the passage in Sanhedrin 74 is not an exaggeration?

– user9806
7 hours ago













@user9806 Great question! You may want to ask it.

– Alex
7 hours ago





@user9806 Great question! You may want to ask it.

– Alex
7 hours ago













1. If this is an exaggeration, then why does the Gemara ask about comparing it to just two of them instead of all three? 2. Consider Avos d'Rebbi Nassan 40:1, which takes this even further: ארבעה דברים אדם העושה אותן נפרעין ממנו בעולם הזה ולעולם הבא: עבודת כוכבים וגילוי עריות ושפיכות דמים ולשון הרע יותר מכולם. Both the wording in Erchin and the wording in AdR"N don't seem to lend themselves to exaggeration.

– DonielF
7 hours ago





1. If this is an exaggeration, then why does the Gemara ask about comparing it to just two of them instead of all three? 2. Consider Avos d'Rebbi Nassan 40:1, which takes this even further: ארבעה דברים אדם העושה אותן נפרעין ממנו בעולם הזה ולעולם הבא: עבודת כוכבים וגילוי עריות ושפיכות דמים ולשון הרע יותר מכולם. Both the wording in Erchin and the wording in AdR"N don't seem to lend themselves to exaggeration.

– DonielF
7 hours ago













3. FWIW the Rambam in Teshuvah 3:6 seems to disagree with this, counting Lashon Hara in the list of things which one loses his Olam Haba, rather than in 3:14 with the things Chazal exaggerated by describing them as such.

– DonielF
7 hours ago





3. FWIW the Rambam in Teshuvah 3:6 seems to disagree with this, counting Lashon Hara in the list of things which one loses his Olam Haba, rather than in 3:14 with the things Chazal exaggerated by describing them as such.

– DonielF
7 hours ago













@DonielF See what Rambam wrote in his Commentary to the Mishnah in Sanhedrin, right before he lists the thirteen principles, which I cited at the end of this answer.

– Alex
6 hours ago







@DonielF See what Rambam wrote in his Commentary to the Mishnah in Sanhedrin, right before he lists the thirteen principles, which I cited at the end of this answer.

– Alex
6 hours ago













3














Rav Chaim Kanievsky (Doleh U'Maskeh pg.263) was asked this question. He answered that lashon harah is a very grave sin, but one is not chayav misah. In footnote 29 the Orchos Tzadikim shaar Lashon Harah is brought as a source. The Orchos Tzadikim explains why lashon harah is equated with the big 3 sins. See also Shaarei Teshuvah 3:202.



Orchos Tzadikim (Sefaria translation):




Our Rabbis, of blessed memory, said, "If one speaks gossip, it is as though he denied God" (Arakin 15b, and see T.P. Peah, 1:1). As it is said (Ps. 12:15), "Who have said : 'Our tongue will we make mighty : our lips are with us : who is lord over us?' " (Arakin 16b, and see T.P. Peah, 1:1). And therefore our Sages considered him as though he denied God, for he does a great evil to his companion, by making him odious in the eyes of the people and causing him other losses, though he himself derives no profit out of this. There is no doubt that one who makes a habit of speaking gossip has thrown off the yoke of Heaven from upon him, for he sins without any benefit to himself, and he is worse than a thief or an adulterer, for they pursue after their pleasure (Shohar Tov, 120:3). And there is no throwing off the yoke of Heaven as bad as when one deals in gossip. Our Sages further said, "The sin of gossip is weighed equally with the sin of idolatry and sexual immorality and bloodshed" (Arakin 15b). Now it is very astonishing that gossip should be equated with these sins, which are those to avoid which a man must rather let himself be killed than transgress (Sanh. 74a). And they said, "The sin of idolatry is so great that anyone who confesses to it, it is as though he denied the whole Torah" (Hullin 5a). And they said, "One who lusts after any form of idolatry, is a rebel against the whole Torah" (Hullin 4b).



And it is important to give the full meaning in this matter, for a gossip repeats his folly; ten times or more every day he humiliates and shames people, aside from the damage that he does to the one that he speaks against. And even a small transgression, when done many times, becomes great, just as although a single hair is soft and very weak, if you gather many hairs together, you can make of them a strong rope. And when they said that gossip is on a scale with those three mortal sins, they referred to one who commits any of these sins once, because of great temptation, but not to one who is such a complete apostate that he has excluded himself from the people of Israel, in order to commit these sins repeatedly. Moreover, a gossip finds it difficult to repent, because he is used to this habit and has taught his tongue to speak evil. Furthermore, this sin appears very light in his eyes, for he says, "I did not do anything — it was just talk." He does not consider the great damage he does, and therefore he does not repent. And even if he should repent, his repentance is not complete, for he does not realize the enormity of the sin which he has committed. Moreover, he must first obtain forgiveness from those against whom he has spoken, and he cannot remember whom they all are. And it may happen that he spoke against a man, and did him evil, and caused him harm and forgot what it was that he said about that man, for gossip is always covered up; it is a blow struck in secret. The gossiper is here and smites with his tongue a person who is far away from him (Arakin 15b, Gen. Rabbah 98:19). And this type of sinner is ashamed to let his victim know that he has done him evil. Sometimes he speaks about a defect in the family of the object of his gossip, thus injuring the generations that come after him, and there is no forgiveness for this, for our Sages said, "For one who speaks about a flaw in a family, there is no forgiveness eternally" (T.P. Baba Kamma 8:10).




enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • So, you’re saying that, according to Rav Chaim, one must be חייב מיתה for יהרג ואל יעבור to apply? Why does one give up his life for חלול השם, then? Also, am I reading the Orchos Tzadikim correctly as equating Lashon Hara over time with any of the Big Three done once, rather than 1:1?

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago













  • That's the lashon Rav Chaim answered, I think he is explaining that lashon harah on its own is never chayav misa. I do believe that reading of the Orchos tzadikim is corrrect.

    – sam
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Do you have an online link to Doleh U’Mashkeh that I could see it inside?

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago











  • I think that Rav Chaim is saying that in order to be in yarog vaal yavor it would need to be an aveirah which carries the death penalty which lashon haraah does not. However,it is compared to the big three and the OT explains why.

    – sam
    4 hours ago











  • Still doesn’t explain why one gives up his life for חילול השם

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago
















3














Rav Chaim Kanievsky (Doleh U'Maskeh pg.263) was asked this question. He answered that lashon harah is a very grave sin, but one is not chayav misah. In footnote 29 the Orchos Tzadikim shaar Lashon Harah is brought as a source. The Orchos Tzadikim explains why lashon harah is equated with the big 3 sins. See also Shaarei Teshuvah 3:202.



Orchos Tzadikim (Sefaria translation):




Our Rabbis, of blessed memory, said, "If one speaks gossip, it is as though he denied God" (Arakin 15b, and see T.P. Peah, 1:1). As it is said (Ps. 12:15), "Who have said : 'Our tongue will we make mighty : our lips are with us : who is lord over us?' " (Arakin 16b, and see T.P. Peah, 1:1). And therefore our Sages considered him as though he denied God, for he does a great evil to his companion, by making him odious in the eyes of the people and causing him other losses, though he himself derives no profit out of this. There is no doubt that one who makes a habit of speaking gossip has thrown off the yoke of Heaven from upon him, for he sins without any benefit to himself, and he is worse than a thief or an adulterer, for they pursue after their pleasure (Shohar Tov, 120:3). And there is no throwing off the yoke of Heaven as bad as when one deals in gossip. Our Sages further said, "The sin of gossip is weighed equally with the sin of idolatry and sexual immorality and bloodshed" (Arakin 15b). Now it is very astonishing that gossip should be equated with these sins, which are those to avoid which a man must rather let himself be killed than transgress (Sanh. 74a). And they said, "The sin of idolatry is so great that anyone who confesses to it, it is as though he denied the whole Torah" (Hullin 5a). And they said, "One who lusts after any form of idolatry, is a rebel against the whole Torah" (Hullin 4b).



And it is important to give the full meaning in this matter, for a gossip repeats his folly; ten times or more every day he humiliates and shames people, aside from the damage that he does to the one that he speaks against. And even a small transgression, when done many times, becomes great, just as although a single hair is soft and very weak, if you gather many hairs together, you can make of them a strong rope. And when they said that gossip is on a scale with those three mortal sins, they referred to one who commits any of these sins once, because of great temptation, but not to one who is such a complete apostate that he has excluded himself from the people of Israel, in order to commit these sins repeatedly. Moreover, a gossip finds it difficult to repent, because he is used to this habit and has taught his tongue to speak evil. Furthermore, this sin appears very light in his eyes, for he says, "I did not do anything — it was just talk." He does not consider the great damage he does, and therefore he does not repent. And even if he should repent, his repentance is not complete, for he does not realize the enormity of the sin which he has committed. Moreover, he must first obtain forgiveness from those against whom he has spoken, and he cannot remember whom they all are. And it may happen that he spoke against a man, and did him evil, and caused him harm and forgot what it was that he said about that man, for gossip is always covered up; it is a blow struck in secret. The gossiper is here and smites with his tongue a person who is far away from him (Arakin 15b, Gen. Rabbah 98:19). And this type of sinner is ashamed to let his victim know that he has done him evil. Sometimes he speaks about a defect in the family of the object of his gossip, thus injuring the generations that come after him, and there is no forgiveness for this, for our Sages said, "For one who speaks about a flaw in a family, there is no forgiveness eternally" (T.P. Baba Kamma 8:10).




enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • So, you’re saying that, according to Rav Chaim, one must be חייב מיתה for יהרג ואל יעבור to apply? Why does one give up his life for חלול השם, then? Also, am I reading the Orchos Tzadikim correctly as equating Lashon Hara over time with any of the Big Three done once, rather than 1:1?

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago













  • That's the lashon Rav Chaim answered, I think he is explaining that lashon harah on its own is never chayav misa. I do believe that reading of the Orchos tzadikim is corrrect.

    – sam
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Do you have an online link to Doleh U’Mashkeh that I could see it inside?

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago











  • I think that Rav Chaim is saying that in order to be in yarog vaal yavor it would need to be an aveirah which carries the death penalty which lashon haraah does not. However,it is compared to the big three and the OT explains why.

    – sam
    4 hours ago











  • Still doesn’t explain why one gives up his life for חילול השם

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago














3












3








3







Rav Chaim Kanievsky (Doleh U'Maskeh pg.263) was asked this question. He answered that lashon harah is a very grave sin, but one is not chayav misah. In footnote 29 the Orchos Tzadikim shaar Lashon Harah is brought as a source. The Orchos Tzadikim explains why lashon harah is equated with the big 3 sins. See also Shaarei Teshuvah 3:202.



Orchos Tzadikim (Sefaria translation):




Our Rabbis, of blessed memory, said, "If one speaks gossip, it is as though he denied God" (Arakin 15b, and see T.P. Peah, 1:1). As it is said (Ps. 12:15), "Who have said : 'Our tongue will we make mighty : our lips are with us : who is lord over us?' " (Arakin 16b, and see T.P. Peah, 1:1). And therefore our Sages considered him as though he denied God, for he does a great evil to his companion, by making him odious in the eyes of the people and causing him other losses, though he himself derives no profit out of this. There is no doubt that one who makes a habit of speaking gossip has thrown off the yoke of Heaven from upon him, for he sins without any benefit to himself, and he is worse than a thief or an adulterer, for they pursue after their pleasure (Shohar Tov, 120:3). And there is no throwing off the yoke of Heaven as bad as when one deals in gossip. Our Sages further said, "The sin of gossip is weighed equally with the sin of idolatry and sexual immorality and bloodshed" (Arakin 15b). Now it is very astonishing that gossip should be equated with these sins, which are those to avoid which a man must rather let himself be killed than transgress (Sanh. 74a). And they said, "The sin of idolatry is so great that anyone who confesses to it, it is as though he denied the whole Torah" (Hullin 5a). And they said, "One who lusts after any form of idolatry, is a rebel against the whole Torah" (Hullin 4b).



And it is important to give the full meaning in this matter, for a gossip repeats his folly; ten times or more every day he humiliates and shames people, aside from the damage that he does to the one that he speaks against. And even a small transgression, when done many times, becomes great, just as although a single hair is soft and very weak, if you gather many hairs together, you can make of them a strong rope. And when they said that gossip is on a scale with those three mortal sins, they referred to one who commits any of these sins once, because of great temptation, but not to one who is such a complete apostate that he has excluded himself from the people of Israel, in order to commit these sins repeatedly. Moreover, a gossip finds it difficult to repent, because he is used to this habit and has taught his tongue to speak evil. Furthermore, this sin appears very light in his eyes, for he says, "I did not do anything — it was just talk." He does not consider the great damage he does, and therefore he does not repent. And even if he should repent, his repentance is not complete, for he does not realize the enormity of the sin which he has committed. Moreover, he must first obtain forgiveness from those against whom he has spoken, and he cannot remember whom they all are. And it may happen that he spoke against a man, and did him evil, and caused him harm and forgot what it was that he said about that man, for gossip is always covered up; it is a blow struck in secret. The gossiper is here and smites with his tongue a person who is far away from him (Arakin 15b, Gen. Rabbah 98:19). And this type of sinner is ashamed to let his victim know that he has done him evil. Sometimes he speaks about a defect in the family of the object of his gossip, thus injuring the generations that come after him, and there is no forgiveness for this, for our Sages said, "For one who speaks about a flaw in a family, there is no forgiveness eternally" (T.P. Baba Kamma 8:10).




enter image description here






share|improve this answer















Rav Chaim Kanievsky (Doleh U'Maskeh pg.263) was asked this question. He answered that lashon harah is a very grave sin, but one is not chayav misah. In footnote 29 the Orchos Tzadikim shaar Lashon Harah is brought as a source. The Orchos Tzadikim explains why lashon harah is equated with the big 3 sins. See also Shaarei Teshuvah 3:202.



Orchos Tzadikim (Sefaria translation):




Our Rabbis, of blessed memory, said, "If one speaks gossip, it is as though he denied God" (Arakin 15b, and see T.P. Peah, 1:1). As it is said (Ps. 12:15), "Who have said : 'Our tongue will we make mighty : our lips are with us : who is lord over us?' " (Arakin 16b, and see T.P. Peah, 1:1). And therefore our Sages considered him as though he denied God, for he does a great evil to his companion, by making him odious in the eyes of the people and causing him other losses, though he himself derives no profit out of this. There is no doubt that one who makes a habit of speaking gossip has thrown off the yoke of Heaven from upon him, for he sins without any benefit to himself, and he is worse than a thief or an adulterer, for they pursue after their pleasure (Shohar Tov, 120:3). And there is no throwing off the yoke of Heaven as bad as when one deals in gossip. Our Sages further said, "The sin of gossip is weighed equally with the sin of idolatry and sexual immorality and bloodshed" (Arakin 15b). Now it is very astonishing that gossip should be equated with these sins, which are those to avoid which a man must rather let himself be killed than transgress (Sanh. 74a). And they said, "The sin of idolatry is so great that anyone who confesses to it, it is as though he denied the whole Torah" (Hullin 5a). And they said, "One who lusts after any form of idolatry, is a rebel against the whole Torah" (Hullin 4b).



And it is important to give the full meaning in this matter, for a gossip repeats his folly; ten times or more every day he humiliates and shames people, aside from the damage that he does to the one that he speaks against. And even a small transgression, when done many times, becomes great, just as although a single hair is soft and very weak, if you gather many hairs together, you can make of them a strong rope. And when they said that gossip is on a scale with those three mortal sins, they referred to one who commits any of these sins once, because of great temptation, but not to one who is such a complete apostate that he has excluded himself from the people of Israel, in order to commit these sins repeatedly. Moreover, a gossip finds it difficult to repent, because he is used to this habit and has taught his tongue to speak evil. Furthermore, this sin appears very light in his eyes, for he says, "I did not do anything — it was just talk." He does not consider the great damage he does, and therefore he does not repent. And even if he should repent, his repentance is not complete, for he does not realize the enormity of the sin which he has committed. Moreover, he must first obtain forgiveness from those against whom he has spoken, and he cannot remember whom they all are. And it may happen that he spoke against a man, and did him evil, and caused him harm and forgot what it was that he said about that man, for gossip is always covered up; it is a blow struck in secret. The gossiper is here and smites with his tongue a person who is far away from him (Arakin 15b, Gen. Rabbah 98:19). And this type of sinner is ashamed to let his victim know that he has done him evil. Sometimes he speaks about a defect in the family of the object of his gossip, thus injuring the generations that come after him, and there is no forgiveness for this, for our Sages said, "For one who speaks about a flaw in a family, there is no forgiveness eternally" (T.P. Baba Kamma 8:10).




enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 46 mins ago









Alex

21.1k153125




21.1k153125










answered 4 hours ago









samsam

25.9k14898




25.9k14898













  • So, you’re saying that, according to Rav Chaim, one must be חייב מיתה for יהרג ואל יעבור to apply? Why does one give up his life for חלול השם, then? Also, am I reading the Orchos Tzadikim correctly as equating Lashon Hara over time with any of the Big Three done once, rather than 1:1?

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago













  • That's the lashon Rav Chaim answered, I think he is explaining that lashon harah on its own is never chayav misa. I do believe that reading of the Orchos tzadikim is corrrect.

    – sam
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Do you have an online link to Doleh U’Mashkeh that I could see it inside?

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago











  • I think that Rav Chaim is saying that in order to be in yarog vaal yavor it would need to be an aveirah which carries the death penalty which lashon haraah does not. However,it is compared to the big three and the OT explains why.

    – sam
    4 hours ago











  • Still doesn’t explain why one gives up his life for חילול השם

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago



















  • So, you’re saying that, according to Rav Chaim, one must be חייב מיתה for יהרג ואל יעבור to apply? Why does one give up his life for חלול השם, then? Also, am I reading the Orchos Tzadikim correctly as equating Lashon Hara over time with any of the Big Three done once, rather than 1:1?

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago













  • That's the lashon Rav Chaim answered, I think he is explaining that lashon harah on its own is never chayav misa. I do believe that reading of the Orchos tzadikim is corrrect.

    – sam
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Do you have an online link to Doleh U’Mashkeh that I could see it inside?

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago











  • I think that Rav Chaim is saying that in order to be in yarog vaal yavor it would need to be an aveirah which carries the death penalty which lashon haraah does not. However,it is compared to the big three and the OT explains why.

    – sam
    4 hours ago











  • Still doesn’t explain why one gives up his life for חילול השם

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago

















So, you’re saying that, according to Rav Chaim, one must be חייב מיתה for יהרג ואל יעבור to apply? Why does one give up his life for חלול השם, then? Also, am I reading the Orchos Tzadikim correctly as equating Lashon Hara over time with any of the Big Three done once, rather than 1:1?

– DonielF
4 hours ago







So, you’re saying that, according to Rav Chaim, one must be חייב מיתה for יהרג ואל יעבור to apply? Why does one give up his life for חלול השם, then? Also, am I reading the Orchos Tzadikim correctly as equating Lashon Hara over time with any of the Big Three done once, rather than 1:1?

– DonielF
4 hours ago















That's the lashon Rav Chaim answered, I think he is explaining that lashon harah on its own is never chayav misa. I do believe that reading of the Orchos tzadikim is corrrect.

– sam
4 hours ago





That's the lashon Rav Chaim answered, I think he is explaining that lashon harah on its own is never chayav misa. I do believe that reading of the Orchos tzadikim is corrrect.

– sam
4 hours ago




1




1





Do you have an online link to Doleh U’Mashkeh that I could see it inside?

– DonielF
4 hours ago





Do you have an online link to Doleh U’Mashkeh that I could see it inside?

– DonielF
4 hours ago













I think that Rav Chaim is saying that in order to be in yarog vaal yavor it would need to be an aveirah which carries the death penalty which lashon haraah does not. However,it is compared to the big three and the OT explains why.

– sam
4 hours ago





I think that Rav Chaim is saying that in order to be in yarog vaal yavor it would need to be an aveirah which carries the death penalty which lashon haraah does not. However,it is compared to the big three and the OT explains why.

– sam
4 hours ago













Still doesn’t explain why one gives up his life for חילול השם

– DonielF
4 hours ago





Still doesn’t explain why one gives up his life for חילול השם

– DonielF
4 hours ago



Popular posts from this blog

Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll? Announcing the arrival of...

Couldn't open a raw socket. Error: Permission denied (13) (nmap)Is it possible to run networking commands...

VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...