When hiring, should I discriminate against a group that is favored by others, for balance? [duplicate]2019...
How to create a label containing values from different layers in QGIS
If angels and devils are the same species, why would their mortal offspring appear physically different?
"Starve to death" Vs. "Starve to the point of death"
Subsurf on a crown. How can I smooth some edges and keep others sharp?
Boss asked me to sign a resignation paper without a date on it along with my new contract
How much light is too much?
Describe a span of time of 1 or 2 years, without being too literal
How do you get out of your own psychology to write characters?
Is there a file that always exists and a 'normal' user can't lstat it?
Article. The word "Respect"
Does diversity provide anything that meritocracy does not?
Non-Cancer terminal illness that can affect young (age 10-13) girls?
Why does 0.-5 evaluate to -5?
Will rerolling initiative each round stop meta-gaming about initiative?
Does it take energy to move something in a circle?
Coworker asking me to not bring cakes due to self control issue. What should I do?
Illustrator to chemdraw
Could a warlock use the One with Shadows warlock invocation to turn invisible, and then move while staying invisible?
Time-efficient matrix elements grouping and summing
A starship is travelling at 0.9c and collides with a small rock. Will it leave a clean hole through, or will more happen?
Does the US government have any planning in place to ensure there's no shortages of food, fuel, steel and other commodities?
What does MTU depend on?
What is a good reason for every spaceship to carry a weapon on board?
How to completely remove a package in Ubuntu (like it never existed)
When hiring, should I discriminate against a group that is favored by others, for balance? [duplicate]
2019 Community Moderator ElectionHow, in practice, can I hire more diversely?In the United States is racial, ethnic, or national preference an acceptable hiring practice for departments or companies in some situations?What should I look for when hiring a salesperson?What factors/questions to consider when hiring for technical supportWhat should I do if I think a group of colleagues is being discriminated against?Should I use a technical challenge when hiring for a junior position?When should a company hire someone for a role vs promoting someone to be that role?How and when should I disclose that I'm deaf?Religious leader won't even consider hiring a white man. How can I change this potentially illegal attitude, yet still encourage diversity?Asking for a clarification of when a hiring process will endWhat salary should I ask for when interviewing for a role that is above my experience levelFactors to consider when deciding between hiring a less qualified candidate or waiting for a better candidate
This question already has an answer here:
How, in practice, can I hire more diversely?
21 answers
I live and work in Boston (software development industry). We have a large population of one religious minority and many managers hire predominantly coders from this same religion. (I know this from personal observation.)
Now, I understand that racial minorities tend to be discriminated against, and therefore, one way to fix that problem is to perform some sort of 'affirmative action'. But I don't see this religion being discriminated against here. I think women and racial minority candidates are more likely to face discrimination.
So, with that in mind, is it appropriate if I hire predominantly coders of a different religion? I know it sounds "bad", but think about it. Say two coders - one a religious minority and another a racial minority both apply for a job at my company. If I don't hire the religious minority applicant, he'll go to any other company and probably get a job immediately. But if I don't hire the racial minority applicant, he won't be able to find another one quite as easily.
management hiring-process discrimination
New contributor
Controversial Post — You may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY to provide a solution to the specific question asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice.
marked as duplicate by motosubatsu, Bilkokuya, gnat, Mister Positive, DanK 2 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
How, in practice, can I hire more diversely?
21 answers
I live and work in Boston (software development industry). We have a large population of one religious minority and many managers hire predominantly coders from this same religion. (I know this from personal observation.)
Now, I understand that racial minorities tend to be discriminated against, and therefore, one way to fix that problem is to perform some sort of 'affirmative action'. But I don't see this religion being discriminated against here. I think women and racial minority candidates are more likely to face discrimination.
So, with that in mind, is it appropriate if I hire predominantly coders of a different religion? I know it sounds "bad", but think about it. Say two coders - one a religious minority and another a racial minority both apply for a job at my company. If I don't hire the religious minority applicant, he'll go to any other company and probably get a job immediately. But if I don't hire the racial minority applicant, he won't be able to find another one quite as easily.
management hiring-process discrimination
New contributor
Controversial Post — You may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY to provide a solution to the specific question asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice.
marked as duplicate by motosubatsu, Bilkokuya, gnat, Mister Positive, DanK 2 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
4
While there's a lot of negative attention to this - I would highlight that the question "should I positively discriminate for the ethnic/gender minorities" is something that a lot of people would reply "yes" to. This question just happens to highlight that positive discrimination for group X is negative discrimination against not group X. The fact that there are lots of pushes to introduce positive discrimination for various groups in various places - eg women in STEM, has lead, unsurprisingly, to confusion. So let's keep to answering the question and not hating the asker
– UKMonkey
5 hours ago
"there's a clear trend of Jewish managers hiring Jewish coders." as an aside, if we're talking about religious Jews what is likely happening is the companies that accommodate religious practices are receiving a high proportion of religious applicants. This will mean that a large amount of qualified individuals will be concentrating their applications in a small pool of companies.
– Orangesandlemons
4 hours ago
1
It can happen sometimes that a workplace ends up with a majority of some demographic group rather than another. People tend to hire from their social and professional networks and sometimes that ends up getting lopsided towards one group. I was once hired into a department where almost everyone was muslim, turned out, it was because they all went to the same mosque. That isn't sustainable indefinitely, and eventually such pools of people will run out and they'll be forced to hire from outside their immediate community (that's how I ended up there).
– teego1967
4 hours ago
2
Run your "it's okay to discriminate because..." theory by HR before you get yourself in trouble. If HR tells you that you are free to discriminate by religion, then good luck.
– Joe Strazzere
2 hours ago
1
@DigitalBlade969 - please don't take this obviously BS post as indicative of the country, or of the Boston area. Nobody would seriously believe the nonsense being proposed could fly. And nobody would be permitted to ask a candidate their religious affiliation. Clearly the OP is just trying to have "fun" with this nonsense question. I voted to Delete this question and I'd ask others to do the same. I don't do that lightly.
– Joe Strazzere
2 hours ago
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
How, in practice, can I hire more diversely?
21 answers
I live and work in Boston (software development industry). We have a large population of one religious minority and many managers hire predominantly coders from this same religion. (I know this from personal observation.)
Now, I understand that racial minorities tend to be discriminated against, and therefore, one way to fix that problem is to perform some sort of 'affirmative action'. But I don't see this religion being discriminated against here. I think women and racial minority candidates are more likely to face discrimination.
So, with that in mind, is it appropriate if I hire predominantly coders of a different religion? I know it sounds "bad", but think about it. Say two coders - one a religious minority and another a racial minority both apply for a job at my company. If I don't hire the religious minority applicant, he'll go to any other company and probably get a job immediately. But if I don't hire the racial minority applicant, he won't be able to find another one quite as easily.
management hiring-process discrimination
New contributor
This question already has an answer here:
How, in practice, can I hire more diversely?
21 answers
I live and work in Boston (software development industry). We have a large population of one religious minority and many managers hire predominantly coders from this same religion. (I know this from personal observation.)
Now, I understand that racial minorities tend to be discriminated against, and therefore, one way to fix that problem is to perform some sort of 'affirmative action'. But I don't see this religion being discriminated against here. I think women and racial minority candidates are more likely to face discrimination.
So, with that in mind, is it appropriate if I hire predominantly coders of a different religion? I know it sounds "bad", but think about it. Say two coders - one a religious minority and another a racial minority both apply for a job at my company. If I don't hire the religious minority applicant, he'll go to any other company and probably get a job immediately. But if I don't hire the racial minority applicant, he won't be able to find another one quite as easily.
This question already has an answer here:
How, in practice, can I hire more diversely?
21 answers
management hiring-process discrimination
management hiring-process discrimination
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 hours ago
Joe Strazzere
249k1237261027
249k1237261027
New contributor
asked 5 hours ago
MarkoMarko
132
132
New contributor
New contributor
Controversial Post — You may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY to provide a solution to the specific question asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice.
Controversial Post — You may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY to provide a solution to the specific question asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice.
marked as duplicate by motosubatsu, Bilkokuya, gnat, Mister Positive, DanK 2 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by motosubatsu, Bilkokuya, gnat, Mister Positive, DanK 2 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
4
While there's a lot of negative attention to this - I would highlight that the question "should I positively discriminate for the ethnic/gender minorities" is something that a lot of people would reply "yes" to. This question just happens to highlight that positive discrimination for group X is negative discrimination against not group X. The fact that there are lots of pushes to introduce positive discrimination for various groups in various places - eg women in STEM, has lead, unsurprisingly, to confusion. So let's keep to answering the question and not hating the asker
– UKMonkey
5 hours ago
"there's a clear trend of Jewish managers hiring Jewish coders." as an aside, if we're talking about religious Jews what is likely happening is the companies that accommodate religious practices are receiving a high proportion of religious applicants. This will mean that a large amount of qualified individuals will be concentrating their applications in a small pool of companies.
– Orangesandlemons
4 hours ago
1
It can happen sometimes that a workplace ends up with a majority of some demographic group rather than another. People tend to hire from their social and professional networks and sometimes that ends up getting lopsided towards one group. I was once hired into a department where almost everyone was muslim, turned out, it was because they all went to the same mosque. That isn't sustainable indefinitely, and eventually such pools of people will run out and they'll be forced to hire from outside their immediate community (that's how I ended up there).
– teego1967
4 hours ago
2
Run your "it's okay to discriminate because..." theory by HR before you get yourself in trouble. If HR tells you that you are free to discriminate by religion, then good luck.
– Joe Strazzere
2 hours ago
1
@DigitalBlade969 - please don't take this obviously BS post as indicative of the country, or of the Boston area. Nobody would seriously believe the nonsense being proposed could fly. And nobody would be permitted to ask a candidate their religious affiliation. Clearly the OP is just trying to have "fun" with this nonsense question. I voted to Delete this question and I'd ask others to do the same. I don't do that lightly.
– Joe Strazzere
2 hours ago
add a comment |
4
While there's a lot of negative attention to this - I would highlight that the question "should I positively discriminate for the ethnic/gender minorities" is something that a lot of people would reply "yes" to. This question just happens to highlight that positive discrimination for group X is negative discrimination against not group X. The fact that there are lots of pushes to introduce positive discrimination for various groups in various places - eg women in STEM, has lead, unsurprisingly, to confusion. So let's keep to answering the question and not hating the asker
– UKMonkey
5 hours ago
"there's a clear trend of Jewish managers hiring Jewish coders." as an aside, if we're talking about religious Jews what is likely happening is the companies that accommodate religious practices are receiving a high proportion of religious applicants. This will mean that a large amount of qualified individuals will be concentrating their applications in a small pool of companies.
– Orangesandlemons
4 hours ago
1
It can happen sometimes that a workplace ends up with a majority of some demographic group rather than another. People tend to hire from their social and professional networks and sometimes that ends up getting lopsided towards one group. I was once hired into a department where almost everyone was muslim, turned out, it was because they all went to the same mosque. That isn't sustainable indefinitely, and eventually such pools of people will run out and they'll be forced to hire from outside their immediate community (that's how I ended up there).
– teego1967
4 hours ago
2
Run your "it's okay to discriminate because..." theory by HR before you get yourself in trouble. If HR tells you that you are free to discriminate by religion, then good luck.
– Joe Strazzere
2 hours ago
1
@DigitalBlade969 - please don't take this obviously BS post as indicative of the country, or of the Boston area. Nobody would seriously believe the nonsense being proposed could fly. And nobody would be permitted to ask a candidate their religious affiliation. Clearly the OP is just trying to have "fun" with this nonsense question. I voted to Delete this question and I'd ask others to do the same. I don't do that lightly.
– Joe Strazzere
2 hours ago
4
4
While there's a lot of negative attention to this - I would highlight that the question "should I positively discriminate for the ethnic/gender minorities" is something that a lot of people would reply "yes" to. This question just happens to highlight that positive discrimination for group X is negative discrimination against not group X. The fact that there are lots of pushes to introduce positive discrimination for various groups in various places - eg women in STEM, has lead, unsurprisingly, to confusion. So let's keep to answering the question and not hating the asker
– UKMonkey
5 hours ago
While there's a lot of negative attention to this - I would highlight that the question "should I positively discriminate for the ethnic/gender minorities" is something that a lot of people would reply "yes" to. This question just happens to highlight that positive discrimination for group X is negative discrimination against not group X. The fact that there are lots of pushes to introduce positive discrimination for various groups in various places - eg women in STEM, has lead, unsurprisingly, to confusion. So let's keep to answering the question and not hating the asker
– UKMonkey
5 hours ago
"there's a clear trend of Jewish managers hiring Jewish coders." as an aside, if we're talking about religious Jews what is likely happening is the companies that accommodate religious practices are receiving a high proportion of religious applicants. This will mean that a large amount of qualified individuals will be concentrating their applications in a small pool of companies.
– Orangesandlemons
4 hours ago
"there's a clear trend of Jewish managers hiring Jewish coders." as an aside, if we're talking about religious Jews what is likely happening is the companies that accommodate religious practices are receiving a high proportion of religious applicants. This will mean that a large amount of qualified individuals will be concentrating their applications in a small pool of companies.
– Orangesandlemons
4 hours ago
1
1
It can happen sometimes that a workplace ends up with a majority of some demographic group rather than another. People tend to hire from their social and professional networks and sometimes that ends up getting lopsided towards one group. I was once hired into a department where almost everyone was muslim, turned out, it was because they all went to the same mosque. That isn't sustainable indefinitely, and eventually such pools of people will run out and they'll be forced to hire from outside their immediate community (that's how I ended up there).
– teego1967
4 hours ago
It can happen sometimes that a workplace ends up with a majority of some demographic group rather than another. People tend to hire from their social and professional networks and sometimes that ends up getting lopsided towards one group. I was once hired into a department where almost everyone was muslim, turned out, it was because they all went to the same mosque. That isn't sustainable indefinitely, and eventually such pools of people will run out and they'll be forced to hire from outside their immediate community (that's how I ended up there).
– teego1967
4 hours ago
2
2
Run your "it's okay to discriminate because..." theory by HR before you get yourself in trouble. If HR tells you that you are free to discriminate by religion, then good luck.
– Joe Strazzere
2 hours ago
Run your "it's okay to discriminate because..." theory by HR before you get yourself in trouble. If HR tells you that you are free to discriminate by religion, then good luck.
– Joe Strazzere
2 hours ago
1
1
@DigitalBlade969 - please don't take this obviously BS post as indicative of the country, or of the Boston area. Nobody would seriously believe the nonsense being proposed could fly. And nobody would be permitted to ask a candidate their religious affiliation. Clearly the OP is just trying to have "fun" with this nonsense question. I voted to Delete this question and I'd ask others to do the same. I don't do that lightly.
– Joe Strazzere
2 hours ago
@DigitalBlade969 - please don't take this obviously BS post as indicative of the country, or of the Boston area. Nobody would seriously believe the nonsense being proposed could fly. And nobody would be permitted to ask a candidate their religious affiliation. Clearly the OP is just trying to have "fun" with this nonsense question. I voted to Delete this question and I'd ask others to do the same. I don't do that lightly.
– Joe Strazzere
2 hours ago
add a comment |
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
You should hire the candidate that is best qualified and the best fit for the position being offered regardless of their sex/race/religion...etc. Doing otherwise could result in a potential lawsuit for your company.
add a comment |
If job applicants from ethnic minority X are being selectively and preferentially hired by other companies in your area then you will naturally have fewer applications from minority X applicants.
Assuming other factors are equal, this will lead to you hiring fewer minority X employees, simply because there are fewer of them available for you to hire.
There is no problem here for you to solve.
Simply hire the best applicant for the position.
add a comment |
There's a very easy way to save yourself a lot of mental and legal hassle:
Don't worry about it.
- It's not your place to right the wrongs of Jewish hiring managers.
- It's not your place to tip the cosmic balance of non-Jewish programmers.
- It's not your place to consider your applicant's demographics when hiring.
Follow those simple rules, substitute Jew with whatever other demographic piques your fancy at any given time, and you'll be just fine. Yalla.
add a comment |
This question is using demographics and stereotypes to form a case.
You hire the person who is most capable and fit to do the job. The person who is the best fit for the job should be chosen regardless of what you class them as.
Your company may also suffer legal issues for discrimination if you deliberately hire people who aren't Jewish simply because of the fact that you didn't want to hire the Jewish person.
add a comment |
Let's assume that your initial descriptions are correct: at many other firms in your area, Jewish managers show a bias in favor of hiring Jewish candidates.
STOP: Right off the bat, that's sounds incredibly anti-Semitic. So you're going to have to back it up. Which means "providing clear, objective evidence", not saying "well everyone knows those guys stick together."
If you are correct, and there really is an identifiable pattern of discrimination in hiring, then find a friend who is a lawyer, describe your evidence to her, and ask her for 5% of the punitive award from any lawsuits she files against those companies in exchange for the evidence. You will shortly be rich enough to retire.
Now you ask, "I think those guys are doing this thing that will get them sued into bankruptcy, so is it okay if I do the same thing over here at my company?"
Of course not!
This is exactly the kind of group stupidity that your mother warned you about: "If all the other banks are investing heavily in Collateralized Debt Obligations, shouldn't my bank do it too?"
Finally, let's have a look at the end of your question:
I know it sounds "bad", but think about it. Say a Jewish and a black
applicant applies for a job at my company. If I don't hire the Jewish
applicant, he'll go to any other company and probably get a job
immediately. But if I don't hire the black applicant, he won't be able
to find another one quite as easily as the Jew.
Let's say two people apply for a job at your company. And let's say there's a really obvious reason to hire one over the other. You're done - hire that one!
Instead, let's say two people apply for a job at your company. And let's say there's no obvious reason to hire one over the other. They're basically the same level of desirability, and it's "yes" in both cases. Now, why are you suggesting the black one can't get hired? Because that's pretty racist.
I'd suggest that you have a problem with racism. Both personally, and possibly within the company. If you're in a position where you are going to make a significant number of hiring decisions, you need to take steps to mitigate it. Talk with HR about anonymizing the resumes that you see, or providing summaries. Maybe one of your junior technical people can work with HR to rewrite candidate CVs into a common voice, and abstract away identifying data like applicant names, names of institutions, and employers.
Alternatively, there are companies out there that perform "level 1 technical interview" services, so your HR group can scan resumes, submit the names and contact data for an interview, and get feedback without having to spend company time on the process.
add a comment |
In addition to already great answers, I would add that it doesn't solve the problem at all. It worsens the situation.
If I don't hire the Jewish applicant, he'll go to any other company and probably get a job immediately. But if I don't hire the black applicant, he won't be able to find another one quite as easily as the Jew.
If every non-jewish stop hiring jewish people, maybe jewish will find another job, but only with a jewish manager. You just make the segregation bigger.
add a comment |
Hiring and promoting people based on ethnicity or religion is illegal according to various anti discrimination laws. If what you claim is true (and not just yet another antisemitic conspiracy theory), those companies are violating the law.
However, responding in kind by discriminating against those demographics which get preferential treatment in other companies would also violate the law. Two wrongs don't make a right. You might want to ask your lawyer if they ever saw an employer win an anti-discrimination lawsuit with the "but everyone is doing it!" defense. I am not a lawyer, but I am pretty sure the answer is no.
And besides that, it's also a bad idea from a business perspective. In order to build a successful company, you want to hire the best people you can get, not the people who fit your racial profile. When you do not discriminate and others do, you have a competitive advantage.
add a comment |
As a company with non-Jewish management, you should promote diversity and provide equal opportunities for all candidates, regardless of their race, nationality, religion, gender, physical or mental disabilities (unless you want a lawsuit filled against you). And you shouldn't bother yourself with practices of companies with Jewish management, they may selectively hire Jewish candidates but that's their choice.
Think of it the following way. The co-existence of companies with diverse staff and companies with predominantly Jewish staff brings even more diversity into the industry.
New contributor
add a comment |
So, with that in mind, is it appropriate if I hire predominantly non-Jewish coders?
It absolutely is not appropriate, NOT to hire somebody, because they are Jewish. It is also absolutely is not appropriate, NOT to hire somebody, because they are NOT Jewish.
By making a hiring decision based on the religious beliefs of somebody, you are discriminating other applicants, who have different religious beliefs.
If any applicant found out the reason they were not hired, was because of their religious beliefs, they would have an open and shut discriminating case against your company.
If I don't hire the Jewish applicant, he'll go to any other
company and probably get a job immediately.
This sounds extremely anti-Semitic. The way this reads is that you believe, due to the religious beliefs of an applicant, they will have a better chance of getting a job.
Despite the fact, this entire question is asking if you should discriminate against the religious beliefs of that applicant, because of your misguided belief they will get a job immediately.
Your belief that they will get hired immediately is obviously NOT true, considering you are considering a different applicant, due to the fact they are NOT Jewish.
But if I don't hire the black applicant, he won't be able to find another one quite as easily.
Do you understand that a black applicant can actually be Jewish? There are also women who are Jewish. If you are considering hiring the applicant, they are obviously not having that much trouble finding a job, despite the fact they are not Jewish.
We have a large Jewish population and many Jewish managers hire predominantly Jewish coders. (I know this from personal observation.)
Any company should simply hire the best applicant that applies. Those with hiring authority should never consider the religious belief of an applicant, discriminating based on religious belief is a protected class in Boston.
add a comment |
No, you shouldn’t unilaterally implement your own affirmative action policy based on anecdotal evidence. Even if you had hard data to back up your assertions, (not to suggest it doesn’t exist but I don’t see any references in your post), you’d simply be giving more munition to people on both sides who think the odds are stacked against them.
That said, it’s good that you’re interested in promoting ethnic diversity in the workplace. A better way to do it, though, would be to broaden the pool of applicants you interview.
add a comment |
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You should hire the candidate that is best qualified and the best fit for the position being offered regardless of their sex/race/religion...etc. Doing otherwise could result in a potential lawsuit for your company.
add a comment |
You should hire the candidate that is best qualified and the best fit for the position being offered regardless of their sex/race/religion...etc. Doing otherwise could result in a potential lawsuit for your company.
add a comment |
You should hire the candidate that is best qualified and the best fit for the position being offered regardless of their sex/race/religion...etc. Doing otherwise could result in a potential lawsuit for your company.
You should hire the candidate that is best qualified and the best fit for the position being offered regardless of their sex/race/religion...etc. Doing otherwise could result in a potential lawsuit for your company.
answered 5 hours ago
sf02sf02
7,98941333
7,98941333
add a comment |
add a comment |
If job applicants from ethnic minority X are being selectively and preferentially hired by other companies in your area then you will naturally have fewer applications from minority X applicants.
Assuming other factors are equal, this will lead to you hiring fewer minority X employees, simply because there are fewer of them available for you to hire.
There is no problem here for you to solve.
Simply hire the best applicant for the position.
add a comment |
If job applicants from ethnic minority X are being selectively and preferentially hired by other companies in your area then you will naturally have fewer applications from minority X applicants.
Assuming other factors are equal, this will lead to you hiring fewer minority X employees, simply because there are fewer of them available for you to hire.
There is no problem here for you to solve.
Simply hire the best applicant for the position.
add a comment |
If job applicants from ethnic minority X are being selectively and preferentially hired by other companies in your area then you will naturally have fewer applications from minority X applicants.
Assuming other factors are equal, this will lead to you hiring fewer minority X employees, simply because there are fewer of them available for you to hire.
There is no problem here for you to solve.
Simply hire the best applicant for the position.
If job applicants from ethnic minority X are being selectively and preferentially hired by other companies in your area then you will naturally have fewer applications from minority X applicants.
Assuming other factors are equal, this will lead to you hiring fewer minority X employees, simply because there are fewer of them available for you to hire.
There is no problem here for you to solve.
Simply hire the best applicant for the position.
answered 5 hours ago
brhansbrhans
2,1931121
2,1931121
add a comment |
add a comment |
There's a very easy way to save yourself a lot of mental and legal hassle:
Don't worry about it.
- It's not your place to right the wrongs of Jewish hiring managers.
- It's not your place to tip the cosmic balance of non-Jewish programmers.
- It's not your place to consider your applicant's demographics when hiring.
Follow those simple rules, substitute Jew with whatever other demographic piques your fancy at any given time, and you'll be just fine. Yalla.
add a comment |
There's a very easy way to save yourself a lot of mental and legal hassle:
Don't worry about it.
- It's not your place to right the wrongs of Jewish hiring managers.
- It's not your place to tip the cosmic balance of non-Jewish programmers.
- It's not your place to consider your applicant's demographics when hiring.
Follow those simple rules, substitute Jew with whatever other demographic piques your fancy at any given time, and you'll be just fine. Yalla.
add a comment |
There's a very easy way to save yourself a lot of mental and legal hassle:
Don't worry about it.
- It's not your place to right the wrongs of Jewish hiring managers.
- It's not your place to tip the cosmic balance of non-Jewish programmers.
- It's not your place to consider your applicant's demographics when hiring.
Follow those simple rules, substitute Jew with whatever other demographic piques your fancy at any given time, and you'll be just fine. Yalla.
There's a very easy way to save yourself a lot of mental and legal hassle:
Don't worry about it.
- It's not your place to right the wrongs of Jewish hiring managers.
- It's not your place to tip the cosmic balance of non-Jewish programmers.
- It's not your place to consider your applicant's demographics when hiring.
Follow those simple rules, substitute Jew with whatever other demographic piques your fancy at any given time, and you'll be just fine. Yalla.
answered 5 hours ago
rathrath
20.1k1462100
20.1k1462100
add a comment |
add a comment |
This question is using demographics and stereotypes to form a case.
You hire the person who is most capable and fit to do the job. The person who is the best fit for the job should be chosen regardless of what you class them as.
Your company may also suffer legal issues for discrimination if you deliberately hire people who aren't Jewish simply because of the fact that you didn't want to hire the Jewish person.
add a comment |
This question is using demographics and stereotypes to form a case.
You hire the person who is most capable and fit to do the job. The person who is the best fit for the job should be chosen regardless of what you class them as.
Your company may also suffer legal issues for discrimination if you deliberately hire people who aren't Jewish simply because of the fact that you didn't want to hire the Jewish person.
add a comment |
This question is using demographics and stereotypes to form a case.
You hire the person who is most capable and fit to do the job. The person who is the best fit for the job should be chosen regardless of what you class them as.
Your company may also suffer legal issues for discrimination if you deliberately hire people who aren't Jewish simply because of the fact that you didn't want to hire the Jewish person.
This question is using demographics and stereotypes to form a case.
You hire the person who is most capable and fit to do the job. The person who is the best fit for the job should be chosen regardless of what you class them as.
Your company may also suffer legal issues for discrimination if you deliberately hire people who aren't Jewish simply because of the fact that you didn't want to hire the Jewish person.
edited 5 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
TwyxzTwyxz
11.7k103774
11.7k103774
add a comment |
add a comment |
Let's assume that your initial descriptions are correct: at many other firms in your area, Jewish managers show a bias in favor of hiring Jewish candidates.
STOP: Right off the bat, that's sounds incredibly anti-Semitic. So you're going to have to back it up. Which means "providing clear, objective evidence", not saying "well everyone knows those guys stick together."
If you are correct, and there really is an identifiable pattern of discrimination in hiring, then find a friend who is a lawyer, describe your evidence to her, and ask her for 5% of the punitive award from any lawsuits she files against those companies in exchange for the evidence. You will shortly be rich enough to retire.
Now you ask, "I think those guys are doing this thing that will get them sued into bankruptcy, so is it okay if I do the same thing over here at my company?"
Of course not!
This is exactly the kind of group stupidity that your mother warned you about: "If all the other banks are investing heavily in Collateralized Debt Obligations, shouldn't my bank do it too?"
Finally, let's have a look at the end of your question:
I know it sounds "bad", but think about it. Say a Jewish and a black
applicant applies for a job at my company. If I don't hire the Jewish
applicant, he'll go to any other company and probably get a job
immediately. But if I don't hire the black applicant, he won't be able
to find another one quite as easily as the Jew.
Let's say two people apply for a job at your company. And let's say there's a really obvious reason to hire one over the other. You're done - hire that one!
Instead, let's say two people apply for a job at your company. And let's say there's no obvious reason to hire one over the other. They're basically the same level of desirability, and it's "yes" in both cases. Now, why are you suggesting the black one can't get hired? Because that's pretty racist.
I'd suggest that you have a problem with racism. Both personally, and possibly within the company. If you're in a position where you are going to make a significant number of hiring decisions, you need to take steps to mitigate it. Talk with HR about anonymizing the resumes that you see, or providing summaries. Maybe one of your junior technical people can work with HR to rewrite candidate CVs into a common voice, and abstract away identifying data like applicant names, names of institutions, and employers.
Alternatively, there are companies out there that perform "level 1 technical interview" services, so your HR group can scan resumes, submit the names and contact data for an interview, and get feedback without having to spend company time on the process.
add a comment |
Let's assume that your initial descriptions are correct: at many other firms in your area, Jewish managers show a bias in favor of hiring Jewish candidates.
STOP: Right off the bat, that's sounds incredibly anti-Semitic. So you're going to have to back it up. Which means "providing clear, objective evidence", not saying "well everyone knows those guys stick together."
If you are correct, and there really is an identifiable pattern of discrimination in hiring, then find a friend who is a lawyer, describe your evidence to her, and ask her for 5% of the punitive award from any lawsuits she files against those companies in exchange for the evidence. You will shortly be rich enough to retire.
Now you ask, "I think those guys are doing this thing that will get them sued into bankruptcy, so is it okay if I do the same thing over here at my company?"
Of course not!
This is exactly the kind of group stupidity that your mother warned you about: "If all the other banks are investing heavily in Collateralized Debt Obligations, shouldn't my bank do it too?"
Finally, let's have a look at the end of your question:
I know it sounds "bad", but think about it. Say a Jewish and a black
applicant applies for a job at my company. If I don't hire the Jewish
applicant, he'll go to any other company and probably get a job
immediately. But if I don't hire the black applicant, he won't be able
to find another one quite as easily as the Jew.
Let's say two people apply for a job at your company. And let's say there's a really obvious reason to hire one over the other. You're done - hire that one!
Instead, let's say two people apply for a job at your company. And let's say there's no obvious reason to hire one over the other. They're basically the same level of desirability, and it's "yes" in both cases. Now, why are you suggesting the black one can't get hired? Because that's pretty racist.
I'd suggest that you have a problem with racism. Both personally, and possibly within the company. If you're in a position where you are going to make a significant number of hiring decisions, you need to take steps to mitigate it. Talk with HR about anonymizing the resumes that you see, or providing summaries. Maybe one of your junior technical people can work with HR to rewrite candidate CVs into a common voice, and abstract away identifying data like applicant names, names of institutions, and employers.
Alternatively, there are companies out there that perform "level 1 technical interview" services, so your HR group can scan resumes, submit the names and contact data for an interview, and get feedback without having to spend company time on the process.
add a comment |
Let's assume that your initial descriptions are correct: at many other firms in your area, Jewish managers show a bias in favor of hiring Jewish candidates.
STOP: Right off the bat, that's sounds incredibly anti-Semitic. So you're going to have to back it up. Which means "providing clear, objective evidence", not saying "well everyone knows those guys stick together."
If you are correct, and there really is an identifiable pattern of discrimination in hiring, then find a friend who is a lawyer, describe your evidence to her, and ask her for 5% of the punitive award from any lawsuits she files against those companies in exchange for the evidence. You will shortly be rich enough to retire.
Now you ask, "I think those guys are doing this thing that will get them sued into bankruptcy, so is it okay if I do the same thing over here at my company?"
Of course not!
This is exactly the kind of group stupidity that your mother warned you about: "If all the other banks are investing heavily in Collateralized Debt Obligations, shouldn't my bank do it too?"
Finally, let's have a look at the end of your question:
I know it sounds "bad", but think about it. Say a Jewish and a black
applicant applies for a job at my company. If I don't hire the Jewish
applicant, he'll go to any other company and probably get a job
immediately. But if I don't hire the black applicant, he won't be able
to find another one quite as easily as the Jew.
Let's say two people apply for a job at your company. And let's say there's a really obvious reason to hire one over the other. You're done - hire that one!
Instead, let's say two people apply for a job at your company. And let's say there's no obvious reason to hire one over the other. They're basically the same level of desirability, and it's "yes" in both cases. Now, why are you suggesting the black one can't get hired? Because that's pretty racist.
I'd suggest that you have a problem with racism. Both personally, and possibly within the company. If you're in a position where you are going to make a significant number of hiring decisions, you need to take steps to mitigate it. Talk with HR about anonymizing the resumes that you see, or providing summaries. Maybe one of your junior technical people can work with HR to rewrite candidate CVs into a common voice, and abstract away identifying data like applicant names, names of institutions, and employers.
Alternatively, there are companies out there that perform "level 1 technical interview" services, so your HR group can scan resumes, submit the names and contact data for an interview, and get feedback without having to spend company time on the process.
Let's assume that your initial descriptions are correct: at many other firms in your area, Jewish managers show a bias in favor of hiring Jewish candidates.
STOP: Right off the bat, that's sounds incredibly anti-Semitic. So you're going to have to back it up. Which means "providing clear, objective evidence", not saying "well everyone knows those guys stick together."
If you are correct, and there really is an identifiable pattern of discrimination in hiring, then find a friend who is a lawyer, describe your evidence to her, and ask her for 5% of the punitive award from any lawsuits she files against those companies in exchange for the evidence. You will shortly be rich enough to retire.
Now you ask, "I think those guys are doing this thing that will get them sued into bankruptcy, so is it okay if I do the same thing over here at my company?"
Of course not!
This is exactly the kind of group stupidity that your mother warned you about: "If all the other banks are investing heavily in Collateralized Debt Obligations, shouldn't my bank do it too?"
Finally, let's have a look at the end of your question:
I know it sounds "bad", but think about it. Say a Jewish and a black
applicant applies for a job at my company. If I don't hire the Jewish
applicant, he'll go to any other company and probably get a job
immediately. But if I don't hire the black applicant, he won't be able
to find another one quite as easily as the Jew.
Let's say two people apply for a job at your company. And let's say there's a really obvious reason to hire one over the other. You're done - hire that one!
Instead, let's say two people apply for a job at your company. And let's say there's no obvious reason to hire one over the other. They're basically the same level of desirability, and it's "yes" in both cases. Now, why are you suggesting the black one can't get hired? Because that's pretty racist.
I'd suggest that you have a problem with racism. Both personally, and possibly within the company. If you're in a position where you are going to make a significant number of hiring decisions, you need to take steps to mitigate it. Talk with HR about anonymizing the resumes that you see, or providing summaries. Maybe one of your junior technical people can work with HR to rewrite candidate CVs into a common voice, and abstract away identifying data like applicant names, names of institutions, and employers.
Alternatively, there are companies out there that perform "level 1 technical interview" services, so your HR group can scan resumes, submit the names and contact data for an interview, and get feedback without having to spend company time on the process.
answered 5 hours ago
Austin HastingsAustin Hastings
57137
57137
add a comment |
add a comment |
In addition to already great answers, I would add that it doesn't solve the problem at all. It worsens the situation.
If I don't hire the Jewish applicant, he'll go to any other company and probably get a job immediately. But if I don't hire the black applicant, he won't be able to find another one quite as easily as the Jew.
If every non-jewish stop hiring jewish people, maybe jewish will find another job, but only with a jewish manager. You just make the segregation bigger.
add a comment |
In addition to already great answers, I would add that it doesn't solve the problem at all. It worsens the situation.
If I don't hire the Jewish applicant, he'll go to any other company and probably get a job immediately. But if I don't hire the black applicant, he won't be able to find another one quite as easily as the Jew.
If every non-jewish stop hiring jewish people, maybe jewish will find another job, but only with a jewish manager. You just make the segregation bigger.
add a comment |
In addition to already great answers, I would add that it doesn't solve the problem at all. It worsens the situation.
If I don't hire the Jewish applicant, he'll go to any other company and probably get a job immediately. But if I don't hire the black applicant, he won't be able to find another one quite as easily as the Jew.
If every non-jewish stop hiring jewish people, maybe jewish will find another job, but only with a jewish manager. You just make the segregation bigger.
In addition to already great answers, I would add that it doesn't solve the problem at all. It worsens the situation.
If I don't hire the Jewish applicant, he'll go to any other company and probably get a job immediately. But if I don't hire the black applicant, he won't be able to find another one quite as easily as the Jew.
If every non-jewish stop hiring jewish people, maybe jewish will find another job, but only with a jewish manager. You just make the segregation bigger.
answered 5 hours ago
KepotxKepotx
272110
272110
add a comment |
add a comment |
Hiring and promoting people based on ethnicity or religion is illegal according to various anti discrimination laws. If what you claim is true (and not just yet another antisemitic conspiracy theory), those companies are violating the law.
However, responding in kind by discriminating against those demographics which get preferential treatment in other companies would also violate the law. Two wrongs don't make a right. You might want to ask your lawyer if they ever saw an employer win an anti-discrimination lawsuit with the "but everyone is doing it!" defense. I am not a lawyer, but I am pretty sure the answer is no.
And besides that, it's also a bad idea from a business perspective. In order to build a successful company, you want to hire the best people you can get, not the people who fit your racial profile. When you do not discriminate and others do, you have a competitive advantage.
add a comment |
Hiring and promoting people based on ethnicity or religion is illegal according to various anti discrimination laws. If what you claim is true (and not just yet another antisemitic conspiracy theory), those companies are violating the law.
However, responding in kind by discriminating against those demographics which get preferential treatment in other companies would also violate the law. Two wrongs don't make a right. You might want to ask your lawyer if they ever saw an employer win an anti-discrimination lawsuit with the "but everyone is doing it!" defense. I am not a lawyer, but I am pretty sure the answer is no.
And besides that, it's also a bad idea from a business perspective. In order to build a successful company, you want to hire the best people you can get, not the people who fit your racial profile. When you do not discriminate and others do, you have a competitive advantage.
add a comment |
Hiring and promoting people based on ethnicity or religion is illegal according to various anti discrimination laws. If what you claim is true (and not just yet another antisemitic conspiracy theory), those companies are violating the law.
However, responding in kind by discriminating against those demographics which get preferential treatment in other companies would also violate the law. Two wrongs don't make a right. You might want to ask your lawyer if they ever saw an employer win an anti-discrimination lawsuit with the "but everyone is doing it!" defense. I am not a lawyer, but I am pretty sure the answer is no.
And besides that, it's also a bad idea from a business perspective. In order to build a successful company, you want to hire the best people you can get, not the people who fit your racial profile. When you do not discriminate and others do, you have a competitive advantage.
Hiring and promoting people based on ethnicity or religion is illegal according to various anti discrimination laws. If what you claim is true (and not just yet another antisemitic conspiracy theory), those companies are violating the law.
However, responding in kind by discriminating against those demographics which get preferential treatment in other companies would also violate the law. Two wrongs don't make a right. You might want to ask your lawyer if they ever saw an employer win an anti-discrimination lawsuit with the "but everyone is doing it!" defense. I am not a lawyer, but I am pretty sure the answer is no.
And besides that, it's also a bad idea from a business perspective. In order to build a successful company, you want to hire the best people you can get, not the people who fit your racial profile. When you do not discriminate and others do, you have a competitive advantage.
edited 4 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
PhilippPhilipp
24.2k55792
24.2k55792
add a comment |
add a comment |
As a company with non-Jewish management, you should promote diversity and provide equal opportunities for all candidates, regardless of their race, nationality, religion, gender, physical or mental disabilities (unless you want a lawsuit filled against you). And you shouldn't bother yourself with practices of companies with Jewish management, they may selectively hire Jewish candidates but that's their choice.
Think of it the following way. The co-existence of companies with diverse staff and companies with predominantly Jewish staff brings even more diversity into the industry.
New contributor
add a comment |
As a company with non-Jewish management, you should promote diversity and provide equal opportunities for all candidates, regardless of their race, nationality, religion, gender, physical or mental disabilities (unless you want a lawsuit filled against you). And you shouldn't bother yourself with practices of companies with Jewish management, they may selectively hire Jewish candidates but that's their choice.
Think of it the following way. The co-existence of companies with diverse staff and companies with predominantly Jewish staff brings even more diversity into the industry.
New contributor
add a comment |
As a company with non-Jewish management, you should promote diversity and provide equal opportunities for all candidates, regardless of their race, nationality, religion, gender, physical or mental disabilities (unless you want a lawsuit filled against you). And you shouldn't bother yourself with practices of companies with Jewish management, they may selectively hire Jewish candidates but that's their choice.
Think of it the following way. The co-existence of companies with diverse staff and companies with predominantly Jewish staff brings even more diversity into the industry.
New contributor
As a company with non-Jewish management, you should promote diversity and provide equal opportunities for all candidates, regardless of their race, nationality, religion, gender, physical or mental disabilities (unless you want a lawsuit filled against you). And you shouldn't bother yourself with practices of companies with Jewish management, they may selectively hire Jewish candidates but that's their choice.
Think of it the following way. The co-existence of companies with diverse staff and companies with predominantly Jewish staff brings even more diversity into the industry.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 5 hours ago
TaosiqueTaosique
101
101
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
So, with that in mind, is it appropriate if I hire predominantly non-Jewish coders?
It absolutely is not appropriate, NOT to hire somebody, because they are Jewish. It is also absolutely is not appropriate, NOT to hire somebody, because they are NOT Jewish.
By making a hiring decision based on the religious beliefs of somebody, you are discriminating other applicants, who have different religious beliefs.
If any applicant found out the reason they were not hired, was because of their religious beliefs, they would have an open and shut discriminating case against your company.
If I don't hire the Jewish applicant, he'll go to any other
company and probably get a job immediately.
This sounds extremely anti-Semitic. The way this reads is that you believe, due to the religious beliefs of an applicant, they will have a better chance of getting a job.
Despite the fact, this entire question is asking if you should discriminate against the religious beliefs of that applicant, because of your misguided belief they will get a job immediately.
Your belief that they will get hired immediately is obviously NOT true, considering you are considering a different applicant, due to the fact they are NOT Jewish.
But if I don't hire the black applicant, he won't be able to find another one quite as easily.
Do you understand that a black applicant can actually be Jewish? There are also women who are Jewish. If you are considering hiring the applicant, they are obviously not having that much trouble finding a job, despite the fact they are not Jewish.
We have a large Jewish population and many Jewish managers hire predominantly Jewish coders. (I know this from personal observation.)
Any company should simply hire the best applicant that applies. Those with hiring authority should never consider the religious belief of an applicant, discriminating based on religious belief is a protected class in Boston.
add a comment |
So, with that in mind, is it appropriate if I hire predominantly non-Jewish coders?
It absolutely is not appropriate, NOT to hire somebody, because they are Jewish. It is also absolutely is not appropriate, NOT to hire somebody, because they are NOT Jewish.
By making a hiring decision based on the religious beliefs of somebody, you are discriminating other applicants, who have different religious beliefs.
If any applicant found out the reason they were not hired, was because of their religious beliefs, they would have an open and shut discriminating case against your company.
If I don't hire the Jewish applicant, he'll go to any other
company and probably get a job immediately.
This sounds extremely anti-Semitic. The way this reads is that you believe, due to the religious beliefs of an applicant, they will have a better chance of getting a job.
Despite the fact, this entire question is asking if you should discriminate against the religious beliefs of that applicant, because of your misguided belief they will get a job immediately.
Your belief that they will get hired immediately is obviously NOT true, considering you are considering a different applicant, due to the fact they are NOT Jewish.
But if I don't hire the black applicant, he won't be able to find another one quite as easily.
Do you understand that a black applicant can actually be Jewish? There are also women who are Jewish. If you are considering hiring the applicant, they are obviously not having that much trouble finding a job, despite the fact they are not Jewish.
We have a large Jewish population and many Jewish managers hire predominantly Jewish coders. (I know this from personal observation.)
Any company should simply hire the best applicant that applies. Those with hiring authority should never consider the religious belief of an applicant, discriminating based on religious belief is a protected class in Boston.
add a comment |
So, with that in mind, is it appropriate if I hire predominantly non-Jewish coders?
It absolutely is not appropriate, NOT to hire somebody, because they are Jewish. It is also absolutely is not appropriate, NOT to hire somebody, because they are NOT Jewish.
By making a hiring decision based on the religious beliefs of somebody, you are discriminating other applicants, who have different religious beliefs.
If any applicant found out the reason they were not hired, was because of their religious beliefs, they would have an open and shut discriminating case against your company.
If I don't hire the Jewish applicant, he'll go to any other
company and probably get a job immediately.
This sounds extremely anti-Semitic. The way this reads is that you believe, due to the religious beliefs of an applicant, they will have a better chance of getting a job.
Despite the fact, this entire question is asking if you should discriminate against the religious beliefs of that applicant, because of your misguided belief they will get a job immediately.
Your belief that they will get hired immediately is obviously NOT true, considering you are considering a different applicant, due to the fact they are NOT Jewish.
But if I don't hire the black applicant, he won't be able to find another one quite as easily.
Do you understand that a black applicant can actually be Jewish? There are also women who are Jewish. If you are considering hiring the applicant, they are obviously not having that much trouble finding a job, despite the fact they are not Jewish.
We have a large Jewish population and many Jewish managers hire predominantly Jewish coders. (I know this from personal observation.)
Any company should simply hire the best applicant that applies. Those with hiring authority should never consider the religious belief of an applicant, discriminating based on religious belief is a protected class in Boston.
So, with that in mind, is it appropriate if I hire predominantly non-Jewish coders?
It absolutely is not appropriate, NOT to hire somebody, because they are Jewish. It is also absolutely is not appropriate, NOT to hire somebody, because they are NOT Jewish.
By making a hiring decision based on the religious beliefs of somebody, you are discriminating other applicants, who have different religious beliefs.
If any applicant found out the reason they were not hired, was because of their religious beliefs, they would have an open and shut discriminating case against your company.
If I don't hire the Jewish applicant, he'll go to any other
company and probably get a job immediately.
This sounds extremely anti-Semitic. The way this reads is that you believe, due to the religious beliefs of an applicant, they will have a better chance of getting a job.
Despite the fact, this entire question is asking if you should discriminate against the religious beliefs of that applicant, because of your misguided belief they will get a job immediately.
Your belief that they will get hired immediately is obviously NOT true, considering you are considering a different applicant, due to the fact they are NOT Jewish.
But if I don't hire the black applicant, he won't be able to find another one quite as easily.
Do you understand that a black applicant can actually be Jewish? There are also women who are Jewish. If you are considering hiring the applicant, they are obviously not having that much trouble finding a job, despite the fact they are not Jewish.
We have a large Jewish population and many Jewish managers hire predominantly Jewish coders. (I know this from personal observation.)
Any company should simply hire the best applicant that applies. Those with hiring authority should never consider the religious belief of an applicant, discriminating based on religious belief is a protected class in Boston.
answered 4 hours ago
RamhoundRamhound
3911613
3911613
add a comment |
add a comment |
No, you shouldn’t unilaterally implement your own affirmative action policy based on anecdotal evidence. Even if you had hard data to back up your assertions, (not to suggest it doesn’t exist but I don’t see any references in your post), you’d simply be giving more munition to people on both sides who think the odds are stacked against them.
That said, it’s good that you’re interested in promoting ethnic diversity in the workplace. A better way to do it, though, would be to broaden the pool of applicants you interview.
add a comment |
No, you shouldn’t unilaterally implement your own affirmative action policy based on anecdotal evidence. Even if you had hard data to back up your assertions, (not to suggest it doesn’t exist but I don’t see any references in your post), you’d simply be giving more munition to people on both sides who think the odds are stacked against them.
That said, it’s good that you’re interested in promoting ethnic diversity in the workplace. A better way to do it, though, would be to broaden the pool of applicants you interview.
add a comment |
No, you shouldn’t unilaterally implement your own affirmative action policy based on anecdotal evidence. Even if you had hard data to back up your assertions, (not to suggest it doesn’t exist but I don’t see any references in your post), you’d simply be giving more munition to people on both sides who think the odds are stacked against them.
That said, it’s good that you’re interested in promoting ethnic diversity in the workplace. A better way to do it, though, would be to broaden the pool of applicants you interview.
No, you shouldn’t unilaterally implement your own affirmative action policy based on anecdotal evidence. Even if you had hard data to back up your assertions, (not to suggest it doesn’t exist but I don’t see any references in your post), you’d simply be giving more munition to people on both sides who think the odds are stacked against them.
That said, it’s good that you’re interested in promoting ethnic diversity in the workplace. A better way to do it, though, would be to broaden the pool of applicants you interview.
answered 4 hours ago
AffableAmblerAffableAmbler
4,59321026
4,59321026
add a comment |
add a comment |
4
While there's a lot of negative attention to this - I would highlight that the question "should I positively discriminate for the ethnic/gender minorities" is something that a lot of people would reply "yes" to. This question just happens to highlight that positive discrimination for group X is negative discrimination against not group X. The fact that there are lots of pushes to introduce positive discrimination for various groups in various places - eg women in STEM, has lead, unsurprisingly, to confusion. So let's keep to answering the question and not hating the asker
– UKMonkey
5 hours ago
"there's a clear trend of Jewish managers hiring Jewish coders." as an aside, if we're talking about religious Jews what is likely happening is the companies that accommodate religious practices are receiving a high proportion of religious applicants. This will mean that a large amount of qualified individuals will be concentrating their applications in a small pool of companies.
– Orangesandlemons
4 hours ago
1
It can happen sometimes that a workplace ends up with a majority of some demographic group rather than another. People tend to hire from their social and professional networks and sometimes that ends up getting lopsided towards one group. I was once hired into a department where almost everyone was muslim, turned out, it was because they all went to the same mosque. That isn't sustainable indefinitely, and eventually such pools of people will run out and they'll be forced to hire from outside their immediate community (that's how I ended up there).
– teego1967
4 hours ago
2
Run your "it's okay to discriminate because..." theory by HR before you get yourself in trouble. If HR tells you that you are free to discriminate by religion, then good luck.
– Joe Strazzere
2 hours ago
1
@DigitalBlade969 - please don't take this obviously BS post as indicative of the country, or of the Boston area. Nobody would seriously believe the nonsense being proposed could fly. And nobody would be permitted to ask a candidate their religious affiliation. Clearly the OP is just trying to have "fun" with this nonsense question. I voted to Delete this question and I'd ask others to do the same. I don't do that lightly.
– Joe Strazzere
2 hours ago