Logistics of a hovering watercraft in a fantasy settingSelf-sufficient ArkWhat are the cultural and military...
Plagiarism of code by other PhD student
Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?
Book about a time-travel war fought by computers
Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?
How to approximate rolls for potions of healing using only d6's?
Make me a metasequence
Are small insurances worth it
When should a commit not be version tagged?
In the comics did Thanos "kill" just sentient beings or all creatures with the snap?
Is there any relevance to Thor getting his hair cut other than comedic value?
Is there a math equivalent to the conditional ternary operator?
Canadian citizen, on US no-fly list. What can I do in order to be allowed on flights which go through US airspace?
How to kill a localhost:8080
Can we carry rice to Japan?
A "strange" unit radio astronomy
Real life puzzle: Unknown alphabet or shorthand
The need of reserving one's ability in job interviews
Did Amazon pay $0 in taxes last year?
Why is s'abonner reflexive?
Help to fix a table
How do ISS astronauts "get their stripes"?
How can I handle a player who pre-plans arguments about my rulings on RAW?
Where is the fallacy here?
What is knowledge and vision?
Logistics of a hovering watercraft in a fantasy setting
Self-sufficient ArkWhat are the cultural and military implications and applications of this magic system?How do I defend an island nation from attackers with 15th century technology?Man vs the godsFeasibility of melee weapons in a highly futuristic sci-fi-fantasy setting?How would the world react to a dragon like species appearing?Floating island made of concrete, part 1: can it be made of roman concrete?How would crowdfunding work in a medieval fantasy setting?How to keep a ship's crew healthy in a fantasy renaissance setting?Deciding between two methods of keeping people from using technology in combat in my urban fantasy setting
$begingroup$
So in my fantasy world, there exists a substance that (when applied to the surface of an object) repels water in the same way a very strong magnet would. This allows boats to hover above the surface of the water.
The people that use this substance are a small tropical island culture, and use their boats to hunt large creatures that can manipulate the water to defend themselves.
My question is this: what would be the optimal design for a boat that uses this substance in terms of balance, propulsion, and handling large waves? Assume pre-industrial technology, but any materials you’d like, since I haven’t nailed down that part of the world yet anyway.
magic technology ships pre-industrial
New contributor
InferiorAuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
So in my fantasy world, there exists a substance that (when applied to the surface of an object) repels water in the same way a very strong magnet would. This allows boats to hover above the surface of the water.
The people that use this substance are a small tropical island culture, and use their boats to hunt large creatures that can manipulate the water to defend themselves.
My question is this: what would be the optimal design for a boat that uses this substance in terms of balance, propulsion, and handling large waves? Assume pre-industrial technology, but any materials you’d like, since I haven’t nailed down that part of the world yet anyway.
magic technology ships pre-industrial
New contributor
InferiorAuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can we get a bit more information on this prey? How large are they, what kind of attacks do they utilize?
$endgroup$
– Mormacil
18 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
"This allows boats to hover above the surface of the water": no it doesn't. Water is a fluid. The craft will float just like any other boat, with the difference that the volume of the hull will be somewhat larger corresponding to the strength of the water-repelling field.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
18 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@AlexP Either that, or it'd just immediately sink right down to the bottom as it repels the water underneath it, sinks a little bit, repels the new water underneath it, sinks a little more, ad infinitum down to the bottom of the ocean.
$endgroup$
– nick012000
13 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I'm with AlexP here. If you repel the water, the water repels you. So it will mostly work the same way than a real boat, with the exception of being unafected by the currents. A wave will still be a wave and hit the boat, just from farther away. The only clear advantage is that you'll stay dry, assuming the boat didn't flip. @nick012000 The water you repel will be blocked by the density of the ocean and will push back on the boat, the same way a boat already does with gravity only (Archimedes principle and all that).
$endgroup$
– Echox
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Since we have Aron the sailing instructor in the game, I thought I should offer the kayaker's perspective on this. A frictionless hull would be an uncontrollable nightmare. Everything you do is a balance of forces between paddle and hull resistance, taking away one of those factors would make it hell to control.
$endgroup$
– Separatrix
3 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
So in my fantasy world, there exists a substance that (when applied to the surface of an object) repels water in the same way a very strong magnet would. This allows boats to hover above the surface of the water.
The people that use this substance are a small tropical island culture, and use their boats to hunt large creatures that can manipulate the water to defend themselves.
My question is this: what would be the optimal design for a boat that uses this substance in terms of balance, propulsion, and handling large waves? Assume pre-industrial technology, but any materials you’d like, since I haven’t nailed down that part of the world yet anyway.
magic technology ships pre-industrial
New contributor
InferiorAuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
So in my fantasy world, there exists a substance that (when applied to the surface of an object) repels water in the same way a very strong magnet would. This allows boats to hover above the surface of the water.
The people that use this substance are a small tropical island culture, and use their boats to hunt large creatures that can manipulate the water to defend themselves.
My question is this: what would be the optimal design for a boat that uses this substance in terms of balance, propulsion, and handling large waves? Assume pre-industrial technology, but any materials you’d like, since I haven’t nailed down that part of the world yet anyway.
magic technology ships pre-industrial
magic technology ships pre-industrial
New contributor
InferiorAuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
InferiorAuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 14 hours ago
Cyn
9,87112246
9,87112246
New contributor
InferiorAuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 19 hours ago
InferiorAuthorInferiorAuthor
514
514
New contributor
InferiorAuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
InferiorAuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
InferiorAuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
Can we get a bit more information on this prey? How large are they, what kind of attacks do they utilize?
$endgroup$
– Mormacil
18 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
"This allows boats to hover above the surface of the water": no it doesn't. Water is a fluid. The craft will float just like any other boat, with the difference that the volume of the hull will be somewhat larger corresponding to the strength of the water-repelling field.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
18 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@AlexP Either that, or it'd just immediately sink right down to the bottom as it repels the water underneath it, sinks a little bit, repels the new water underneath it, sinks a little more, ad infinitum down to the bottom of the ocean.
$endgroup$
– nick012000
13 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I'm with AlexP here. If you repel the water, the water repels you. So it will mostly work the same way than a real boat, with the exception of being unafected by the currents. A wave will still be a wave and hit the boat, just from farther away. The only clear advantage is that you'll stay dry, assuming the boat didn't flip. @nick012000 The water you repel will be blocked by the density of the ocean and will push back on the boat, the same way a boat already does with gravity only (Archimedes principle and all that).
$endgroup$
– Echox
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Since we have Aron the sailing instructor in the game, I thought I should offer the kayaker's perspective on this. A frictionless hull would be an uncontrollable nightmare. Everything you do is a balance of forces between paddle and hull resistance, taking away one of those factors would make it hell to control.
$endgroup$
– Separatrix
3 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Can we get a bit more information on this prey? How large are they, what kind of attacks do they utilize?
$endgroup$
– Mormacil
18 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
"This allows boats to hover above the surface of the water": no it doesn't. Water is a fluid. The craft will float just like any other boat, with the difference that the volume of the hull will be somewhat larger corresponding to the strength of the water-repelling field.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
18 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@AlexP Either that, or it'd just immediately sink right down to the bottom as it repels the water underneath it, sinks a little bit, repels the new water underneath it, sinks a little more, ad infinitum down to the bottom of the ocean.
$endgroup$
– nick012000
13 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I'm with AlexP here. If you repel the water, the water repels you. So it will mostly work the same way than a real boat, with the exception of being unafected by the currents. A wave will still be a wave and hit the boat, just from farther away. The only clear advantage is that you'll stay dry, assuming the boat didn't flip. @nick012000 The water you repel will be blocked by the density of the ocean and will push back on the boat, the same way a boat already does with gravity only (Archimedes principle and all that).
$endgroup$
– Echox
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Since we have Aron the sailing instructor in the game, I thought I should offer the kayaker's perspective on this. A frictionless hull would be an uncontrollable nightmare. Everything you do is a balance of forces between paddle and hull resistance, taking away one of those factors would make it hell to control.
$endgroup$
– Separatrix
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Can we get a bit more information on this prey? How large are they, what kind of attacks do they utilize?
$endgroup$
– Mormacil
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
Can we get a bit more information on this prey? How large are they, what kind of attacks do they utilize?
$endgroup$
– Mormacil
18 hours ago
9
9
$begingroup$
"This allows boats to hover above the surface of the water": no it doesn't. Water is a fluid. The craft will float just like any other boat, with the difference that the volume of the hull will be somewhat larger corresponding to the strength of the water-repelling field.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
"This allows boats to hover above the surface of the water": no it doesn't. Water is a fluid. The craft will float just like any other boat, with the difference that the volume of the hull will be somewhat larger corresponding to the strength of the water-repelling field.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
18 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@AlexP Either that, or it'd just immediately sink right down to the bottom as it repels the water underneath it, sinks a little bit, repels the new water underneath it, sinks a little more, ad infinitum down to the bottom of the ocean.
$endgroup$
– nick012000
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP Either that, or it'd just immediately sink right down to the bottom as it repels the water underneath it, sinks a little bit, repels the new water underneath it, sinks a little more, ad infinitum down to the bottom of the ocean.
$endgroup$
– nick012000
13 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
I'm with AlexP here. If you repel the water, the water repels you. So it will mostly work the same way than a real boat, with the exception of being unafected by the currents. A wave will still be a wave and hit the boat, just from farther away. The only clear advantage is that you'll stay dry, assuming the boat didn't flip. @nick012000 The water you repel will be blocked by the density of the ocean and will push back on the boat, the same way a boat already does with gravity only (Archimedes principle and all that).
$endgroup$
– Echox
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm with AlexP here. If you repel the water, the water repels you. So it will mostly work the same way than a real boat, with the exception of being unafected by the currents. A wave will still be a wave and hit the boat, just from farther away. The only clear advantage is that you'll stay dry, assuming the boat didn't flip. @nick012000 The water you repel will be blocked by the density of the ocean and will push back on the boat, the same way a boat already does with gravity only (Archimedes principle and all that).
$endgroup$
– Echox
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Since we have Aron the sailing instructor in the game, I thought I should offer the kayaker's perspective on this. A frictionless hull would be an uncontrollable nightmare. Everything you do is a balance of forces between paddle and hull resistance, taking away one of those factors would make it hell to control.
$endgroup$
– Separatrix
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Since we have Aron the sailing instructor in the game, I thought I should offer the kayaker's perspective on this. A frictionless hull would be an uncontrollable nightmare. Everything you do is a balance of forces between paddle and hull resistance, taking away one of those factors would make it hell to control.
$endgroup$
– Separatrix
3 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Strangely enough, your boats aren't going to be THAT different from the boats we already have in terms of propulsion and wave handling. Balance is a completely different matter, but let's deal with each of these criteria one at a time.
Propulsion
You really have two options with your level of technology and they're the same options that everyone else had; oars and sails. Depending on how far above the water you sit though, oars are problematic because they have to be longer to get into the water meaning you need to be stronger to pull the oar. For open sea journeys this is an issue because putting the rowers close enough to the water to make oars effective is counter productive to being able to handle large waves, where you want high watertight 'walls' on the side of your boat (more on that later) so I'd stick with sails.
Sails could be managed by the people you describe technologically, especially as pre-industrial doesn't mean pre-science. There are plenty of examples in history of pre-industrial sailors who used sophisticated means to get their boats from one place to another in terms of both navigation and wind management so this is the best option. Just bear in mind, these kinds of large sailing vessels were a massive expenditure prior to industrialisation and they would be for your world as well.
Large Waves
Ultimately the best defence against high waves is high walls. On conventional ships, they sat very tall in the water (with massive ballast reserves in the hull to keep them upright) so as to survive high seas. Your floating boat will need the same walls, so your boat will still have a number of decks on it with walls on the side to stave off wave strike.
Balance (and Navigation because they're related)
These boats will have flat bottoms. It's that simple. You don't need to keep the boat from drifting in current because your boat floats above it in the first place, so there's no need for deep hulls. You'll need keels (and rudders) though, because the sails are only part of the propulsion equation in that boats actually rely on some resistance against the hull to change direction. Rudders for instance need contact with the water to reorient the boat. So, your boat probably has a large rectangular square bottom to maximise the repulsion area against the water, hence maximising the balance of the boat. BUT, it also has a series of long keels that dip into the water (not coated with the repulsive material) that help with steering, and at least some of these will be on swivels that can be controlled from within the boat for steering as a rudder. Ideally, these would be on the outer edges of the flat surface to preserve stability, like a catamaran.
As Aron points out in comments, this may not work. Certainly, the resistance that a keel can generate is minimal by comparison to a hull, so the idea that you could successfully do anything other than use a rudder like control surface is in doubt and as such, should be taken as speculative.
So, your boat would look like a very large floating bathtub, with keels and sails below and above it respectively. That will allow it to balance, survive high seas, and move & navigate on the open sea.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@Mark yes you're right, I realised that after posting. I'll edit to reflect that.
$endgroup$
– Tim B II
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Ex sailing instructor here, sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible. A hover craft would not be able to generate lateral resistance needed for a sail to push against to generate lift.
$endgroup$
– Aron
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible" What about the people who use parachutes to sail along on surfboards while jumping out the water?
$endgroup$
– nick012000
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@nick012000 well I'm pretty sure (although I suspect Aron could confirm this or otherwise) that it's about surface contact over mass. The surfboard still has contact and therefore some friction with the water, and the parachute provides thrust while the flat of the surfboard provides enough surface friction to alter direction. But, that's more of an educated guess
$endgroup$
– Tim B II
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sailing hydrofoils do exist afaik. I'm no sailing instructor but I can't see why keels that dip into the water wouldn't be sufficient.
$endgroup$
– ben
12 hours ago
|
show 11 more comments
$begingroup$

Alright I think a flat hull will be by far the most stable design. You want a constant repelling force and a flat wide hull gives you stability against waves. At the same time you do want a somewhat high front against waves.
A
A tall front to steer against waves. This also gives you a vantage point to engage your prey with if they're large enough. Obviously this comes equipped with a railing, in fact your whole boat will be.
B
Back/front view. A wide flat hull for stability with a high railing on the main deck.
C
I was considering using your water repellent for some sort of ingenious propulsion mechanic before I realized you need to push that down in the water with more force then the boat weights. But maybe it will inspire you or someone else to make it work with some force multipliers.
D
An upgrade could be extra hulls not unlike a catamaran. The idea being you place those far and wide to give addition stability against waves from the sides. This will require some very strong water repellent to work. Extra strength by joining them with the mast against the central line of the ship.
E
Sails will be your best propulsion system. With no contact with water you should be able to get some frightening speeds.
Now for more specific details I turn you to regular ship design. You might want more storage space then a single space between your hull and the main deck. You probably want regular rudders in the back to aid with steering your vessel, regular rudders should work, uncoated. You might want multiple sails, again regular sources on sail design should have you covered.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Ex sailing instructor here, sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible. A hover craft would not be able to generate lateral resistance needed for a sail to push against to generate lift.
$endgroup$
– Aron
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
In regards to D, "very strong repellant" shouldn't be a necessity for the extra hulls. The pressure on the hulls will be distributed equally according to surface area. As long as the repellant exerts a particular force in relation to the surface area it is painted on, the repellant will work the same (in regards to flotation) for all sizes of hulls.
$endgroup$
– Flater
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Aron: Just to specify for us landlubbers; when you say "sailing", you mean steered sailing as opposed to simple propulsion in the direction of the wind; right? As far as I understand the mechanics of sailing, having a keel that still drags in the water (by not coating it in the repellant) would solve that issue, no?
$endgroup$
– Flater
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'd think about it completely differently than a boat.
It's true that sailing would be impossible since it's been pointed out that sailing relies on the resistance of the hull in the water to navigate effectively. But that's not true for aviating like you might do in a balloon, which is essentially what you have. You have a flying craft that simply flies very close to the ground.
You haven't specified how far above the surface the craft would hover, but I'm assuming that it's at least a meter (~3ft) so that it can get over most of the mundane waves and swells. Your technology level doesn't really allow for using fans like a zeppelin or blimp would use to steer, but you could still navigate just like a hot-air balloonist or glider pilot would.
Like the Polynesians, your civilization would be familiar with ocean and wind currents, but with a bias towards the wind aspect as that's the strongest form of propulsion you'll use. Knowledge of the ocean currents would mostly only be useful for tracking prey.
As far as the design of the craft, it should definitely get wider as it goes down into a large flat base for the repelling material. Water would just stream off it down the sides. You can use sails or even kites, balloons or parachutes to grab the wind and pull you along. Control surfaces like wings and tails on airplanes help you steer. Remember, you're in the air not on the water. As long as you can keep your means of moving and navigating intact, your craft should survive just about anything.
As other answers suggest, the wider base will provide stability and since you have basically a sink proof material lining the bottom it won't really matter if the craft is totally swallowed by a wave. As long as the bottom is heavier than the top, the craft will rise back up from underwater. Maybe some kind of air bladder/attic area(s) sealed into the upper/highest parts of the ship. As long as your decks drained you could temporarily be fully submerged and probably come out ok.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
as long as the bottom is heavier than the top, the craft will rise back up from underwaterThat is not a given. Consider that overturned ships don't always naturally flip back up, even if their (intended) bottom is heavier than their (intended) top. Imagine a really wide but very low ship, with a heavy bottom in the middle. Now put that ship upside down on the water. It's never going to flip itself upright because it's much too wide for it to flip naturally. This is why catamarans widen their base so they become flip-resistant. But a flipped catamaran will also be harder to flip back.
$endgroup$
– Flater
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Something that is just repels water is not going to float if entirely submerged, unless it is strong enough to bring some air with it. If the air bubble is lost due to turbulence then the magic substance is only going to have natural buoyancy.
$endgroup$
– Paul Johnson
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Depending on the sea conditions, you might be able to do something interesting with waves. Ignoring wind and air resistance for a moment, a craft like this will tend to slide down a wave, so if you are going the same way as the waves then propulsion is very simple. If you combine this with a sail then you could, if you are clever enough, use the difference in wave and wind movement to control your direction.
The Wandering Albatross does something like this to glide without flapping its wings. Your islanders are not going to do exactly that, but they will probably have related techniques. The simplest thing would be to use a sail to move sideways along a wave, using the trough of the wave a bit like a keep, thereby going to the left or right of the wind and wave direction. I don't think you could tack like this though.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Super surfboard.
In answers so far the water repulsion has been considered a sort of ultrafloatation. Really, though, this tech would be super useful for propulsion. Imagine a surfboard. Only the back is treated - possible at an angle, not parallel to the water surface. The treated back repels water and so rides higher. One would have exactly the same effect with a regular surfboard if the back were physically higher than the front which is the case where you are on a wave. The net effect of the vectors is to push the board forward.
With this water repulsion tech, the surfboards will move forward even on still water. Because the mid to front of the board is in the water, one can still use friction of the board against the water to steer just as with a regular board. A skeg or keel could still be on the board to improve maneuverability - just don't treat that with repulsion tech.
The main benefit of this application of the water repulsion tech is awesomeness. It will not be like a bunch of dudes hunched in a Teflon whaleboat. It will be more like Mongols on horseback - but faster. The party surfing out from shore at sunrise will be cool as can be. If there are waves (maybe created by the water creature?) they can do some regular surfing too. They will hang ten with their harpoon lassos. It might even be possible to surf right up onto the sea creatures.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Take a mundane surfboard. Add a trivial weight transparent bulg hanging down from its back. This "repels water". Why doesn't your technique work? How is this magic technique fundamentally different?
$endgroup$
– Yakk
56 mins ago
$begingroup$
You describe buoyancy. The OP makes this akin to magnetism. You can float a magnet atop another magnet. You can push a magnet along a surface with another magnet. I thought this magic magnetlike repulsion was like this pushing / floating phenomenon. It would be interesting to make a mockup with a flat surface made of magnets S side up taped together and a HotWheels car with an S side down magnet under its back end. If the magnet sheet were deformable like water this would be a fine simulation.
$endgroup$
– Willk
5 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another way to use this magic substance for propulsion comes to mind, extrapolating on Willk's answer: A stone or piece of wood, with a hole bored through, and some of the substance smeared around the opening on one side would make a handy no-fuel water rocket, especially if it was put coaxially inside a tube of bamboo or something to direct the water flow.
You'd start the torpedo by sticking the front end into the water and pushing it down until a jet of water starts shooting out the back, and then lower the whole shebang into the water.
Basically I'm thinking of a ramjet-type operating principle, the water comes in pressurised to an extent by the intake shape and is vaporized by the cavitation effect after coming out of the stone nozzle, since under water the ring of well-placed magic substance (and it's toroid-shaped anti-water field) creates a no-water area right after the nozzle, leaving a small "hole" in the middle of the nozzle where the field is the weakest. There's more room in the exhaust section of the tube for the expanded vapor to escape, and less pressure, so the vapor escapes that way, creating suction for bringing in new water through the nozzle.
I don't know if this is really feasible give only a water-repelling magic substance, but sounds plausible enough for a magic-using world.
As a bonus, the question absolutely brings to mind the hydrophobe wizards of Krull from The Colour of Magic :)
New contributor
Roope is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Being able to aim your craft while sailing relies on balancing the forces of the wind with the forces you apply on the water.
The boat is long and narrow, and has much much more resistance to movement perpendicular to its hull than parallel. When you add a force from the sails, it lets you "lever" that wind force into force going the direction you want. In extreme "tacking" cases you are even sailing into the wind using its force to pull you towards it!
This means that naive designs won't work. A flat-bottomed boat will act more like a balloon than a ship, and will be tossed around by the wind in the direction the wind goes.
While keels can help, that keel needs to be reinforced against the forces and large enough to provide the force you need all alone; in effect you end up with a hull.
But not all is lost. Under newton's law, all forces generate equal and opposite reactions.
Make the ship long and narrow. Have it force a line into the water, actually shaping the water and forming an impression.
Going forward a relatively narrow section needs to be moved, while going sideways a much larger section of water.
So you'll want the ship to be shaped much like a hull; or, more accurately, so that the "virtual" hull around it caused by the repulsion field is shaped like a conventional hull.
Defence against waves acts similarly, except the shape we care about is the virtual hull instead of the hull. Note that "holes" in the virtual hull may be harder than holes in a hull if the effect radiates out in all directions.
If the "virtual" hull can be shaped without shaping the hull things can get interesting. Does the effect end when you leave line of sight? Then you could do interesting things with "covers" to turn off/on the effect.
Imagine a tube picking up water. It fills a chamber. Then the entry tube is closed, the repulsion field is "turned on", firing the water out the rear. Then it is turned off, feeding more water into the chamber.
What more, the "hull" of the ship need not be solid. It could be a net of treated material held rigid in a frame. The virtual hull would be far smoother than the net, and would have no gaps.
Rowing could be done out holes in this "hull", extending through the virtual hull unopposed, and pushing against the water. The surface area of rowing would be larger than on a conventional ship, who is mostly limited by the water-air barrier around the ship.
The oars themselves could be treated with this substance and never themselves get wet. If you could cover up the effect, "oars" that permit that could be used for propulsion, generating an effect similar to the "jet" above.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the sake of concision, I'm going to refer to the anti-water magnetic coating as AWMC. I'm assuming that AWMC is polar, that it can be turned off or directed, or that the repulsion is significantly stronger on one side, since otherwise the crew wouldn't be able to go near once it was applied (humans being mostly water). I'm also assuming that the AWMC resistance force is quite powerful.
The optimal hull design is to stick to regular hull designs just with a thin layer of AWMC that functions as frictionless coating + waterproofing.
The real genius is using AWMC for propulsion, since it's been shown by our resident sailors and kayakers that traditional forms of naval propulsion require friction/resistance. Introducing... the WHIFFLE MOTOR (patent pending)!! In its simplest form, the whiffle motor is a board with holes poked in it and AWMC applied to the back side. When it's first dropped into the water, the board generates thrust by resisting the water, but this creates a vacuum/pressure gradient in the water, most strongly right at the transition point where water comes in through the intake holes.
Water is pulled in by the gradient and then pushed backwards by the AWMC coating, and the cycle begins.
Better designs streamline the overall setup so that the most water possible is pushed backwards the most evenly, thus generating the most even and powerful thrust.
In my unprofessional opinion, the best designs probably would probably look like a jet engine or turbofan engine, making it so that water only comes in from the intake and all the water is ejected in a smooth stream.
Steering is now a question of having some lesser boards that can be angled more freely.
Basically, you now have spacecraft in a roughly 2D plane. Speed is limited by the direct resistance that water provides to being pushed apart, so you don't get to go stupidly fast just with a basic WHIFFLE MOTOR (patent pending).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
InferiorAuthor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140699%2flogistics-of-a-hovering-watercraft-in-a-fantasy-setting%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Strangely enough, your boats aren't going to be THAT different from the boats we already have in terms of propulsion and wave handling. Balance is a completely different matter, but let's deal with each of these criteria one at a time.
Propulsion
You really have two options with your level of technology and they're the same options that everyone else had; oars and sails. Depending on how far above the water you sit though, oars are problematic because they have to be longer to get into the water meaning you need to be stronger to pull the oar. For open sea journeys this is an issue because putting the rowers close enough to the water to make oars effective is counter productive to being able to handle large waves, where you want high watertight 'walls' on the side of your boat (more on that later) so I'd stick with sails.
Sails could be managed by the people you describe technologically, especially as pre-industrial doesn't mean pre-science. There are plenty of examples in history of pre-industrial sailors who used sophisticated means to get their boats from one place to another in terms of both navigation and wind management so this is the best option. Just bear in mind, these kinds of large sailing vessels were a massive expenditure prior to industrialisation and they would be for your world as well.
Large Waves
Ultimately the best defence against high waves is high walls. On conventional ships, they sat very tall in the water (with massive ballast reserves in the hull to keep them upright) so as to survive high seas. Your floating boat will need the same walls, so your boat will still have a number of decks on it with walls on the side to stave off wave strike.
Balance (and Navigation because they're related)
These boats will have flat bottoms. It's that simple. You don't need to keep the boat from drifting in current because your boat floats above it in the first place, so there's no need for deep hulls. You'll need keels (and rudders) though, because the sails are only part of the propulsion equation in that boats actually rely on some resistance against the hull to change direction. Rudders for instance need contact with the water to reorient the boat. So, your boat probably has a large rectangular square bottom to maximise the repulsion area against the water, hence maximising the balance of the boat. BUT, it also has a series of long keels that dip into the water (not coated with the repulsive material) that help with steering, and at least some of these will be on swivels that can be controlled from within the boat for steering as a rudder. Ideally, these would be on the outer edges of the flat surface to preserve stability, like a catamaran.
As Aron points out in comments, this may not work. Certainly, the resistance that a keel can generate is minimal by comparison to a hull, so the idea that you could successfully do anything other than use a rudder like control surface is in doubt and as such, should be taken as speculative.
So, your boat would look like a very large floating bathtub, with keels and sails below and above it respectively. That will allow it to balance, survive high seas, and move & navigate on the open sea.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@Mark yes you're right, I realised that after posting. I'll edit to reflect that.
$endgroup$
– Tim B II
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Ex sailing instructor here, sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible. A hover craft would not be able to generate lateral resistance needed for a sail to push against to generate lift.
$endgroup$
– Aron
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible" What about the people who use parachutes to sail along on surfboards while jumping out the water?
$endgroup$
– nick012000
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@nick012000 well I'm pretty sure (although I suspect Aron could confirm this or otherwise) that it's about surface contact over mass. The surfboard still has contact and therefore some friction with the water, and the parachute provides thrust while the flat of the surfboard provides enough surface friction to alter direction. But, that's more of an educated guess
$endgroup$
– Tim B II
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sailing hydrofoils do exist afaik. I'm no sailing instructor but I can't see why keels that dip into the water wouldn't be sufficient.
$endgroup$
– ben
12 hours ago
|
show 11 more comments
$begingroup$
Strangely enough, your boats aren't going to be THAT different from the boats we already have in terms of propulsion and wave handling. Balance is a completely different matter, but let's deal with each of these criteria one at a time.
Propulsion
You really have two options with your level of technology and they're the same options that everyone else had; oars and sails. Depending on how far above the water you sit though, oars are problematic because they have to be longer to get into the water meaning you need to be stronger to pull the oar. For open sea journeys this is an issue because putting the rowers close enough to the water to make oars effective is counter productive to being able to handle large waves, where you want high watertight 'walls' on the side of your boat (more on that later) so I'd stick with sails.
Sails could be managed by the people you describe technologically, especially as pre-industrial doesn't mean pre-science. There are plenty of examples in history of pre-industrial sailors who used sophisticated means to get their boats from one place to another in terms of both navigation and wind management so this is the best option. Just bear in mind, these kinds of large sailing vessels were a massive expenditure prior to industrialisation and they would be for your world as well.
Large Waves
Ultimately the best defence against high waves is high walls. On conventional ships, they sat very tall in the water (with massive ballast reserves in the hull to keep them upright) so as to survive high seas. Your floating boat will need the same walls, so your boat will still have a number of decks on it with walls on the side to stave off wave strike.
Balance (and Navigation because they're related)
These boats will have flat bottoms. It's that simple. You don't need to keep the boat from drifting in current because your boat floats above it in the first place, so there's no need for deep hulls. You'll need keels (and rudders) though, because the sails are only part of the propulsion equation in that boats actually rely on some resistance against the hull to change direction. Rudders for instance need contact with the water to reorient the boat. So, your boat probably has a large rectangular square bottom to maximise the repulsion area against the water, hence maximising the balance of the boat. BUT, it also has a series of long keels that dip into the water (not coated with the repulsive material) that help with steering, and at least some of these will be on swivels that can be controlled from within the boat for steering as a rudder. Ideally, these would be on the outer edges of the flat surface to preserve stability, like a catamaran.
As Aron points out in comments, this may not work. Certainly, the resistance that a keel can generate is minimal by comparison to a hull, so the idea that you could successfully do anything other than use a rudder like control surface is in doubt and as such, should be taken as speculative.
So, your boat would look like a very large floating bathtub, with keels and sails below and above it respectively. That will allow it to balance, survive high seas, and move & navigate on the open sea.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@Mark yes you're right, I realised that after posting. I'll edit to reflect that.
$endgroup$
– Tim B II
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Ex sailing instructor here, sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible. A hover craft would not be able to generate lateral resistance needed for a sail to push against to generate lift.
$endgroup$
– Aron
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible" What about the people who use parachutes to sail along on surfboards while jumping out the water?
$endgroup$
– nick012000
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@nick012000 well I'm pretty sure (although I suspect Aron could confirm this or otherwise) that it's about surface contact over mass. The surfboard still has contact and therefore some friction with the water, and the parachute provides thrust while the flat of the surfboard provides enough surface friction to alter direction. But, that's more of an educated guess
$endgroup$
– Tim B II
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sailing hydrofoils do exist afaik. I'm no sailing instructor but I can't see why keels that dip into the water wouldn't be sufficient.
$endgroup$
– ben
12 hours ago
|
show 11 more comments
$begingroup$
Strangely enough, your boats aren't going to be THAT different from the boats we already have in terms of propulsion and wave handling. Balance is a completely different matter, but let's deal with each of these criteria one at a time.
Propulsion
You really have two options with your level of technology and they're the same options that everyone else had; oars and sails. Depending on how far above the water you sit though, oars are problematic because they have to be longer to get into the water meaning you need to be stronger to pull the oar. For open sea journeys this is an issue because putting the rowers close enough to the water to make oars effective is counter productive to being able to handle large waves, where you want high watertight 'walls' on the side of your boat (more on that later) so I'd stick with sails.
Sails could be managed by the people you describe technologically, especially as pre-industrial doesn't mean pre-science. There are plenty of examples in history of pre-industrial sailors who used sophisticated means to get their boats from one place to another in terms of both navigation and wind management so this is the best option. Just bear in mind, these kinds of large sailing vessels were a massive expenditure prior to industrialisation and they would be for your world as well.
Large Waves
Ultimately the best defence against high waves is high walls. On conventional ships, they sat very tall in the water (with massive ballast reserves in the hull to keep them upright) so as to survive high seas. Your floating boat will need the same walls, so your boat will still have a number of decks on it with walls on the side to stave off wave strike.
Balance (and Navigation because they're related)
These boats will have flat bottoms. It's that simple. You don't need to keep the boat from drifting in current because your boat floats above it in the first place, so there's no need for deep hulls. You'll need keels (and rudders) though, because the sails are only part of the propulsion equation in that boats actually rely on some resistance against the hull to change direction. Rudders for instance need contact with the water to reorient the boat. So, your boat probably has a large rectangular square bottom to maximise the repulsion area against the water, hence maximising the balance of the boat. BUT, it also has a series of long keels that dip into the water (not coated with the repulsive material) that help with steering, and at least some of these will be on swivels that can be controlled from within the boat for steering as a rudder. Ideally, these would be on the outer edges of the flat surface to preserve stability, like a catamaran.
As Aron points out in comments, this may not work. Certainly, the resistance that a keel can generate is minimal by comparison to a hull, so the idea that you could successfully do anything other than use a rudder like control surface is in doubt and as such, should be taken as speculative.
So, your boat would look like a very large floating bathtub, with keels and sails below and above it respectively. That will allow it to balance, survive high seas, and move & navigate on the open sea.
$endgroup$
Strangely enough, your boats aren't going to be THAT different from the boats we already have in terms of propulsion and wave handling. Balance is a completely different matter, but let's deal with each of these criteria one at a time.
Propulsion
You really have two options with your level of technology and they're the same options that everyone else had; oars and sails. Depending on how far above the water you sit though, oars are problematic because they have to be longer to get into the water meaning you need to be stronger to pull the oar. For open sea journeys this is an issue because putting the rowers close enough to the water to make oars effective is counter productive to being able to handle large waves, where you want high watertight 'walls' on the side of your boat (more on that later) so I'd stick with sails.
Sails could be managed by the people you describe technologically, especially as pre-industrial doesn't mean pre-science. There are plenty of examples in history of pre-industrial sailors who used sophisticated means to get their boats from one place to another in terms of both navigation and wind management so this is the best option. Just bear in mind, these kinds of large sailing vessels were a massive expenditure prior to industrialisation and they would be for your world as well.
Large Waves
Ultimately the best defence against high waves is high walls. On conventional ships, they sat very tall in the water (with massive ballast reserves in the hull to keep them upright) so as to survive high seas. Your floating boat will need the same walls, so your boat will still have a number of decks on it with walls on the side to stave off wave strike.
Balance (and Navigation because they're related)
These boats will have flat bottoms. It's that simple. You don't need to keep the boat from drifting in current because your boat floats above it in the first place, so there's no need for deep hulls. You'll need keels (and rudders) though, because the sails are only part of the propulsion equation in that boats actually rely on some resistance against the hull to change direction. Rudders for instance need contact with the water to reorient the boat. So, your boat probably has a large rectangular square bottom to maximise the repulsion area against the water, hence maximising the balance of the boat. BUT, it also has a series of long keels that dip into the water (not coated with the repulsive material) that help with steering, and at least some of these will be on swivels that can be controlled from within the boat for steering as a rudder. Ideally, these would be on the outer edges of the flat surface to preserve stability, like a catamaran.
As Aron points out in comments, this may not work. Certainly, the resistance that a keel can generate is minimal by comparison to a hull, so the idea that you could successfully do anything other than use a rudder like control surface is in doubt and as such, should be taken as speculative.
So, your boat would look like a very large floating bathtub, with keels and sails below and above it respectively. That will allow it to balance, survive high seas, and move & navigate on the open sea.
edited 15 hours ago
answered 18 hours ago
Tim B IITim B II
30.2k665119
30.2k665119
$begingroup$
@Mark yes you're right, I realised that after posting. I'll edit to reflect that.
$endgroup$
– Tim B II
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Ex sailing instructor here, sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible. A hover craft would not be able to generate lateral resistance needed for a sail to push against to generate lift.
$endgroup$
– Aron
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible" What about the people who use parachutes to sail along on surfboards while jumping out the water?
$endgroup$
– nick012000
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@nick012000 well I'm pretty sure (although I suspect Aron could confirm this or otherwise) that it's about surface contact over mass. The surfboard still has contact and therefore some friction with the water, and the parachute provides thrust while the flat of the surfboard provides enough surface friction to alter direction. But, that's more of an educated guess
$endgroup$
– Tim B II
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sailing hydrofoils do exist afaik. I'm no sailing instructor but I can't see why keels that dip into the water wouldn't be sufficient.
$endgroup$
– ben
12 hours ago
|
show 11 more comments
$begingroup$
@Mark yes you're right, I realised that after posting. I'll edit to reflect that.
$endgroup$
– Tim B II
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Ex sailing instructor here, sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible. A hover craft would not be able to generate lateral resistance needed for a sail to push against to generate lift.
$endgroup$
– Aron
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible" What about the people who use parachutes to sail along on surfboards while jumping out the water?
$endgroup$
– nick012000
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@nick012000 well I'm pretty sure (although I suspect Aron could confirm this or otherwise) that it's about surface contact over mass. The surfboard still has contact and therefore some friction with the water, and the parachute provides thrust while the flat of the surfboard provides enough surface friction to alter direction. But, that's more of an educated guess
$endgroup$
– Tim B II
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sailing hydrofoils do exist afaik. I'm no sailing instructor but I can't see why keels that dip into the water wouldn't be sufficient.
$endgroup$
– ben
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Mark yes you're right, I realised that after posting. I'll edit to reflect that.
$endgroup$
– Tim B II
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Mark yes you're right, I realised that after posting. I'll edit to reflect that.
$endgroup$
– Tim B II
17 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Ex sailing instructor here, sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible. A hover craft would not be able to generate lateral resistance needed for a sail to push against to generate lift.
$endgroup$
– Aron
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ex sailing instructor here, sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible. A hover craft would not be able to generate lateral resistance needed for a sail to push against to generate lift.
$endgroup$
– Aron
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible" What about the people who use parachutes to sail along on surfboards while jumping out the water?
$endgroup$
– nick012000
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible" What about the people who use parachutes to sail along on surfboards while jumping out the water?
$endgroup$
– nick012000
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@nick012000 well I'm pretty sure (although I suspect Aron could confirm this or otherwise) that it's about surface contact over mass. The surfboard still has contact and therefore some friction with the water, and the parachute provides thrust while the flat of the surfboard provides enough surface friction to alter direction. But, that's more of an educated guess
$endgroup$
– Tim B II
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@nick012000 well I'm pretty sure (although I suspect Aron could confirm this or otherwise) that it's about surface contact over mass. The surfboard still has contact and therefore some friction with the water, and the parachute provides thrust while the flat of the surfboard provides enough surface friction to alter direction. But, that's more of an educated guess
$endgroup$
– Tim B II
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sailing hydrofoils do exist afaik. I'm no sailing instructor but I can't see why keels that dip into the water wouldn't be sufficient.
$endgroup$
– ben
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sailing hydrofoils do exist afaik. I'm no sailing instructor but I can't see why keels that dip into the water wouldn't be sufficient.
$endgroup$
– ben
12 hours ago
|
show 11 more comments
$begingroup$

Alright I think a flat hull will be by far the most stable design. You want a constant repelling force and a flat wide hull gives you stability against waves. At the same time you do want a somewhat high front against waves.
A
A tall front to steer against waves. This also gives you a vantage point to engage your prey with if they're large enough. Obviously this comes equipped with a railing, in fact your whole boat will be.
B
Back/front view. A wide flat hull for stability with a high railing on the main deck.
C
I was considering using your water repellent for some sort of ingenious propulsion mechanic before I realized you need to push that down in the water with more force then the boat weights. But maybe it will inspire you or someone else to make it work with some force multipliers.
D
An upgrade could be extra hulls not unlike a catamaran. The idea being you place those far and wide to give addition stability against waves from the sides. This will require some very strong water repellent to work. Extra strength by joining them with the mast against the central line of the ship.
E
Sails will be your best propulsion system. With no contact with water you should be able to get some frightening speeds.
Now for more specific details I turn you to regular ship design. You might want more storage space then a single space between your hull and the main deck. You probably want regular rudders in the back to aid with steering your vessel, regular rudders should work, uncoated. You might want multiple sails, again regular sources on sail design should have you covered.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Ex sailing instructor here, sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible. A hover craft would not be able to generate lateral resistance needed for a sail to push against to generate lift.
$endgroup$
– Aron
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
In regards to D, "very strong repellant" shouldn't be a necessity for the extra hulls. The pressure on the hulls will be distributed equally according to surface area. As long as the repellant exerts a particular force in relation to the surface area it is painted on, the repellant will work the same (in regards to flotation) for all sizes of hulls.
$endgroup$
– Flater
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Aron: Just to specify for us landlubbers; when you say "sailing", you mean steered sailing as opposed to simple propulsion in the direction of the wind; right? As far as I understand the mechanics of sailing, having a keel that still drags in the water (by not coating it in the repellant) would solve that issue, no?
$endgroup$
– Flater
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$

Alright I think a flat hull will be by far the most stable design. You want a constant repelling force and a flat wide hull gives you stability against waves. At the same time you do want a somewhat high front against waves.
A
A tall front to steer against waves. This also gives you a vantage point to engage your prey with if they're large enough. Obviously this comes equipped with a railing, in fact your whole boat will be.
B
Back/front view. A wide flat hull for stability with a high railing on the main deck.
C
I was considering using your water repellent for some sort of ingenious propulsion mechanic before I realized you need to push that down in the water with more force then the boat weights. But maybe it will inspire you or someone else to make it work with some force multipliers.
D
An upgrade could be extra hulls not unlike a catamaran. The idea being you place those far and wide to give addition stability against waves from the sides. This will require some very strong water repellent to work. Extra strength by joining them with the mast against the central line of the ship.
E
Sails will be your best propulsion system. With no contact with water you should be able to get some frightening speeds.
Now for more specific details I turn you to regular ship design. You might want more storage space then a single space between your hull and the main deck. You probably want regular rudders in the back to aid with steering your vessel, regular rudders should work, uncoated. You might want multiple sails, again regular sources on sail design should have you covered.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Ex sailing instructor here, sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible. A hover craft would not be able to generate lateral resistance needed for a sail to push against to generate lift.
$endgroup$
– Aron
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
In regards to D, "very strong repellant" shouldn't be a necessity for the extra hulls. The pressure on the hulls will be distributed equally according to surface area. As long as the repellant exerts a particular force in relation to the surface area it is painted on, the repellant will work the same (in regards to flotation) for all sizes of hulls.
$endgroup$
– Flater
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Aron: Just to specify for us landlubbers; when you say "sailing", you mean steered sailing as opposed to simple propulsion in the direction of the wind; right? As far as I understand the mechanics of sailing, having a keel that still drags in the water (by not coating it in the repellant) would solve that issue, no?
$endgroup$
– Flater
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$

Alright I think a flat hull will be by far the most stable design. You want a constant repelling force and a flat wide hull gives you stability against waves. At the same time you do want a somewhat high front against waves.
A
A tall front to steer against waves. This also gives you a vantage point to engage your prey with if they're large enough. Obviously this comes equipped with a railing, in fact your whole boat will be.
B
Back/front view. A wide flat hull for stability with a high railing on the main deck.
C
I was considering using your water repellent for some sort of ingenious propulsion mechanic before I realized you need to push that down in the water with more force then the boat weights. But maybe it will inspire you or someone else to make it work with some force multipliers.
D
An upgrade could be extra hulls not unlike a catamaran. The idea being you place those far and wide to give addition stability against waves from the sides. This will require some very strong water repellent to work. Extra strength by joining them with the mast against the central line of the ship.
E
Sails will be your best propulsion system. With no contact with water you should be able to get some frightening speeds.
Now for more specific details I turn you to regular ship design. You might want more storage space then a single space between your hull and the main deck. You probably want regular rudders in the back to aid with steering your vessel, regular rudders should work, uncoated. You might want multiple sails, again regular sources on sail design should have you covered.
$endgroup$

Alright I think a flat hull will be by far the most stable design. You want a constant repelling force and a flat wide hull gives you stability against waves. At the same time you do want a somewhat high front against waves.
A
A tall front to steer against waves. This also gives you a vantage point to engage your prey with if they're large enough. Obviously this comes equipped with a railing, in fact your whole boat will be.
B
Back/front view. A wide flat hull for stability with a high railing on the main deck.
C
I was considering using your water repellent for some sort of ingenious propulsion mechanic before I realized you need to push that down in the water with more force then the boat weights. But maybe it will inspire you or someone else to make it work with some force multipliers.
D
An upgrade could be extra hulls not unlike a catamaran. The idea being you place those far and wide to give addition stability against waves from the sides. This will require some very strong water repellent to work. Extra strength by joining them with the mast against the central line of the ship.
E
Sails will be your best propulsion system. With no contact with water you should be able to get some frightening speeds.
Now for more specific details I turn you to regular ship design. You might want more storage space then a single space between your hull and the main deck. You probably want regular rudders in the back to aid with steering your vessel, regular rudders should work, uncoated. You might want multiple sails, again regular sources on sail design should have you covered.
answered 18 hours ago
MormacilMormacil
7,94132151
7,94132151
2
$begingroup$
Ex sailing instructor here, sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible. A hover craft would not be able to generate lateral resistance needed for a sail to push against to generate lift.
$endgroup$
– Aron
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
In regards to D, "very strong repellant" shouldn't be a necessity for the extra hulls. The pressure on the hulls will be distributed equally according to surface area. As long as the repellant exerts a particular force in relation to the surface area it is painted on, the repellant will work the same (in regards to flotation) for all sizes of hulls.
$endgroup$
– Flater
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Aron: Just to specify for us landlubbers; when you say "sailing", you mean steered sailing as opposed to simple propulsion in the direction of the wind; right? As far as I understand the mechanics of sailing, having a keel that still drags in the water (by not coating it in the repellant) would solve that issue, no?
$endgroup$
– Flater
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Ex sailing instructor here, sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible. A hover craft would not be able to generate lateral resistance needed for a sail to push against to generate lift.
$endgroup$
– Aron
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
In regards to D, "very strong repellant" shouldn't be a necessity for the extra hulls. The pressure on the hulls will be distributed equally according to surface area. As long as the repellant exerts a particular force in relation to the surface area it is painted on, the repellant will work the same (in regards to flotation) for all sizes of hulls.
$endgroup$
– Flater
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Aron: Just to specify for us landlubbers; when you say "sailing", you mean steered sailing as opposed to simple propulsion in the direction of the wind; right? As far as I understand the mechanics of sailing, having a keel that still drags in the water (by not coating it in the repellant) would solve that issue, no?
$endgroup$
– Flater
7 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Ex sailing instructor here, sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible. A hover craft would not be able to generate lateral resistance needed for a sail to push against to generate lift.
$endgroup$
– Aron
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ex sailing instructor here, sailing a hovercraft is literally impossible. A hover craft would not be able to generate lateral resistance needed for a sail to push against to generate lift.
$endgroup$
– Aron
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
In regards to D, "very strong repellant" shouldn't be a necessity for the extra hulls. The pressure on the hulls will be distributed equally according to surface area. As long as the repellant exerts a particular force in relation to the surface area it is painted on, the repellant will work the same (in regards to flotation) for all sizes of hulls.
$endgroup$
– Flater
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
In regards to D, "very strong repellant" shouldn't be a necessity for the extra hulls. The pressure on the hulls will be distributed equally according to surface area. As long as the repellant exerts a particular force in relation to the surface area it is painted on, the repellant will work the same (in regards to flotation) for all sizes of hulls.
$endgroup$
– Flater
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Aron: Just to specify for us landlubbers; when you say "sailing", you mean steered sailing as opposed to simple propulsion in the direction of the wind; right? As far as I understand the mechanics of sailing, having a keel that still drags in the water (by not coating it in the repellant) would solve that issue, no?
$endgroup$
– Flater
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Aron: Just to specify for us landlubbers; when you say "sailing", you mean steered sailing as opposed to simple propulsion in the direction of the wind; right? As far as I understand the mechanics of sailing, having a keel that still drags in the water (by not coating it in the repellant) would solve that issue, no?
$endgroup$
– Flater
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'd think about it completely differently than a boat.
It's true that sailing would be impossible since it's been pointed out that sailing relies on the resistance of the hull in the water to navigate effectively. But that's not true for aviating like you might do in a balloon, which is essentially what you have. You have a flying craft that simply flies very close to the ground.
You haven't specified how far above the surface the craft would hover, but I'm assuming that it's at least a meter (~3ft) so that it can get over most of the mundane waves and swells. Your technology level doesn't really allow for using fans like a zeppelin or blimp would use to steer, but you could still navigate just like a hot-air balloonist or glider pilot would.
Like the Polynesians, your civilization would be familiar with ocean and wind currents, but with a bias towards the wind aspect as that's the strongest form of propulsion you'll use. Knowledge of the ocean currents would mostly only be useful for tracking prey.
As far as the design of the craft, it should definitely get wider as it goes down into a large flat base for the repelling material. Water would just stream off it down the sides. You can use sails or even kites, balloons or parachutes to grab the wind and pull you along. Control surfaces like wings and tails on airplanes help you steer. Remember, you're in the air not on the water. As long as you can keep your means of moving and navigating intact, your craft should survive just about anything.
As other answers suggest, the wider base will provide stability and since you have basically a sink proof material lining the bottom it won't really matter if the craft is totally swallowed by a wave. As long as the bottom is heavier than the top, the craft will rise back up from underwater. Maybe some kind of air bladder/attic area(s) sealed into the upper/highest parts of the ship. As long as your decks drained you could temporarily be fully submerged and probably come out ok.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
as long as the bottom is heavier than the top, the craft will rise back up from underwaterThat is not a given. Consider that overturned ships don't always naturally flip back up, even if their (intended) bottom is heavier than their (intended) top. Imagine a really wide but very low ship, with a heavy bottom in the middle. Now put that ship upside down on the water. It's never going to flip itself upright because it's much too wide for it to flip naturally. This is why catamarans widen their base so they become flip-resistant. But a flipped catamaran will also be harder to flip back.
$endgroup$
– Flater
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Something that is just repels water is not going to float if entirely submerged, unless it is strong enough to bring some air with it. If the air bubble is lost due to turbulence then the magic substance is only going to have natural buoyancy.
$endgroup$
– Paul Johnson
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'd think about it completely differently than a boat.
It's true that sailing would be impossible since it's been pointed out that sailing relies on the resistance of the hull in the water to navigate effectively. But that's not true for aviating like you might do in a balloon, which is essentially what you have. You have a flying craft that simply flies very close to the ground.
You haven't specified how far above the surface the craft would hover, but I'm assuming that it's at least a meter (~3ft) so that it can get over most of the mundane waves and swells. Your technology level doesn't really allow for using fans like a zeppelin or blimp would use to steer, but you could still navigate just like a hot-air balloonist or glider pilot would.
Like the Polynesians, your civilization would be familiar with ocean and wind currents, but with a bias towards the wind aspect as that's the strongest form of propulsion you'll use. Knowledge of the ocean currents would mostly only be useful for tracking prey.
As far as the design of the craft, it should definitely get wider as it goes down into a large flat base for the repelling material. Water would just stream off it down the sides. You can use sails or even kites, balloons or parachutes to grab the wind and pull you along. Control surfaces like wings and tails on airplanes help you steer. Remember, you're in the air not on the water. As long as you can keep your means of moving and navigating intact, your craft should survive just about anything.
As other answers suggest, the wider base will provide stability and since you have basically a sink proof material lining the bottom it won't really matter if the craft is totally swallowed by a wave. As long as the bottom is heavier than the top, the craft will rise back up from underwater. Maybe some kind of air bladder/attic area(s) sealed into the upper/highest parts of the ship. As long as your decks drained you could temporarily be fully submerged and probably come out ok.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
as long as the bottom is heavier than the top, the craft will rise back up from underwaterThat is not a given. Consider that overturned ships don't always naturally flip back up, even if their (intended) bottom is heavier than their (intended) top. Imagine a really wide but very low ship, with a heavy bottom in the middle. Now put that ship upside down on the water. It's never going to flip itself upright because it's much too wide for it to flip naturally. This is why catamarans widen their base so they become flip-resistant. But a flipped catamaran will also be harder to flip back.
$endgroup$
– Flater
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Something that is just repels water is not going to float if entirely submerged, unless it is strong enough to bring some air with it. If the air bubble is lost due to turbulence then the magic substance is only going to have natural buoyancy.
$endgroup$
– Paul Johnson
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'd think about it completely differently than a boat.
It's true that sailing would be impossible since it's been pointed out that sailing relies on the resistance of the hull in the water to navigate effectively. But that's not true for aviating like you might do in a balloon, which is essentially what you have. You have a flying craft that simply flies very close to the ground.
You haven't specified how far above the surface the craft would hover, but I'm assuming that it's at least a meter (~3ft) so that it can get over most of the mundane waves and swells. Your technology level doesn't really allow for using fans like a zeppelin or blimp would use to steer, but you could still navigate just like a hot-air balloonist or glider pilot would.
Like the Polynesians, your civilization would be familiar with ocean and wind currents, but with a bias towards the wind aspect as that's the strongest form of propulsion you'll use. Knowledge of the ocean currents would mostly only be useful for tracking prey.
As far as the design of the craft, it should definitely get wider as it goes down into a large flat base for the repelling material. Water would just stream off it down the sides. You can use sails or even kites, balloons or parachutes to grab the wind and pull you along. Control surfaces like wings and tails on airplanes help you steer. Remember, you're in the air not on the water. As long as you can keep your means of moving and navigating intact, your craft should survive just about anything.
As other answers suggest, the wider base will provide stability and since you have basically a sink proof material lining the bottom it won't really matter if the craft is totally swallowed by a wave. As long as the bottom is heavier than the top, the craft will rise back up from underwater. Maybe some kind of air bladder/attic area(s) sealed into the upper/highest parts of the ship. As long as your decks drained you could temporarily be fully submerged and probably come out ok.
$endgroup$
I'd think about it completely differently than a boat.
It's true that sailing would be impossible since it's been pointed out that sailing relies on the resistance of the hull in the water to navigate effectively. But that's not true for aviating like you might do in a balloon, which is essentially what you have. You have a flying craft that simply flies very close to the ground.
You haven't specified how far above the surface the craft would hover, but I'm assuming that it's at least a meter (~3ft) so that it can get over most of the mundane waves and swells. Your technology level doesn't really allow for using fans like a zeppelin or blimp would use to steer, but you could still navigate just like a hot-air balloonist or glider pilot would.
Like the Polynesians, your civilization would be familiar with ocean and wind currents, but with a bias towards the wind aspect as that's the strongest form of propulsion you'll use. Knowledge of the ocean currents would mostly only be useful for tracking prey.
As far as the design of the craft, it should definitely get wider as it goes down into a large flat base for the repelling material. Water would just stream off it down the sides. You can use sails or even kites, balloons or parachutes to grab the wind and pull you along. Control surfaces like wings and tails on airplanes help you steer. Remember, you're in the air not on the water. As long as you can keep your means of moving and navigating intact, your craft should survive just about anything.
As other answers suggest, the wider base will provide stability and since you have basically a sink proof material lining the bottom it won't really matter if the craft is totally swallowed by a wave. As long as the bottom is heavier than the top, the craft will rise back up from underwater. Maybe some kind of air bladder/attic area(s) sealed into the upper/highest parts of the ship. As long as your decks drained you could temporarily be fully submerged and probably come out ok.
edited 11 hours ago
answered 12 hours ago
coblrcoblr
20524
20524
1
$begingroup$
as long as the bottom is heavier than the top, the craft will rise back up from underwaterThat is not a given. Consider that overturned ships don't always naturally flip back up, even if their (intended) bottom is heavier than their (intended) top. Imagine a really wide but very low ship, with a heavy bottom in the middle. Now put that ship upside down on the water. It's never going to flip itself upright because it's much too wide for it to flip naturally. This is why catamarans widen their base so they become flip-resistant. But a flipped catamaran will also be harder to flip back.
$endgroup$
– Flater
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Something that is just repels water is not going to float if entirely submerged, unless it is strong enough to bring some air with it. If the air bubble is lost due to turbulence then the magic substance is only going to have natural buoyancy.
$endgroup$
– Paul Johnson
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
as long as the bottom is heavier than the top, the craft will rise back up from underwaterThat is not a given. Consider that overturned ships don't always naturally flip back up, even if their (intended) bottom is heavier than their (intended) top. Imagine a really wide but very low ship, with a heavy bottom in the middle. Now put that ship upside down on the water. It's never going to flip itself upright because it's much too wide for it to flip naturally. This is why catamarans widen their base so they become flip-resistant. But a flipped catamaran will also be harder to flip back.
$endgroup$
– Flater
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Something that is just repels water is not going to float if entirely submerged, unless it is strong enough to bring some air with it. If the air bubble is lost due to turbulence then the magic substance is only going to have natural buoyancy.
$endgroup$
– Paul Johnson
3 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
as long as the bottom is heavier than the top, the craft will rise back up from underwater That is not a given. Consider that overturned ships don't always naturally flip back up, even if their (intended) bottom is heavier than their (intended) top. Imagine a really wide but very low ship, with a heavy bottom in the middle. Now put that ship upside down on the water. It's never going to flip itself upright because it's much too wide for it to flip naturally. This is why catamarans widen their base so they become flip-resistant. But a flipped catamaran will also be harder to flip back.$endgroup$
– Flater
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
as long as the bottom is heavier than the top, the craft will rise back up from underwater That is not a given. Consider that overturned ships don't always naturally flip back up, even if their (intended) bottom is heavier than their (intended) top. Imagine a really wide but very low ship, with a heavy bottom in the middle. Now put that ship upside down on the water. It's never going to flip itself upright because it's much too wide for it to flip naturally. This is why catamarans widen their base so they become flip-resistant. But a flipped catamaran will also be harder to flip back.$endgroup$
– Flater
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Something that is just repels water is not going to float if entirely submerged, unless it is strong enough to bring some air with it. If the air bubble is lost due to turbulence then the magic substance is only going to have natural buoyancy.
$endgroup$
– Paul Johnson
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Something that is just repels water is not going to float if entirely submerged, unless it is strong enough to bring some air with it. If the air bubble is lost due to turbulence then the magic substance is only going to have natural buoyancy.
$endgroup$
– Paul Johnson
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Depending on the sea conditions, you might be able to do something interesting with waves. Ignoring wind and air resistance for a moment, a craft like this will tend to slide down a wave, so if you are going the same way as the waves then propulsion is very simple. If you combine this with a sail then you could, if you are clever enough, use the difference in wave and wind movement to control your direction.
The Wandering Albatross does something like this to glide without flapping its wings. Your islanders are not going to do exactly that, but they will probably have related techniques. The simplest thing would be to use a sail to move sideways along a wave, using the trough of the wave a bit like a keep, thereby going to the left or right of the wind and wave direction. I don't think you could tack like this though.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Depending on the sea conditions, you might be able to do something interesting with waves. Ignoring wind and air resistance for a moment, a craft like this will tend to slide down a wave, so if you are going the same way as the waves then propulsion is very simple. If you combine this with a sail then you could, if you are clever enough, use the difference in wave and wind movement to control your direction.
The Wandering Albatross does something like this to glide without flapping its wings. Your islanders are not going to do exactly that, but they will probably have related techniques. The simplest thing would be to use a sail to move sideways along a wave, using the trough of the wave a bit like a keep, thereby going to the left or right of the wind and wave direction. I don't think you could tack like this though.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Depending on the sea conditions, you might be able to do something interesting with waves. Ignoring wind and air resistance for a moment, a craft like this will tend to slide down a wave, so if you are going the same way as the waves then propulsion is very simple. If you combine this with a sail then you could, if you are clever enough, use the difference in wave and wind movement to control your direction.
The Wandering Albatross does something like this to glide without flapping its wings. Your islanders are not going to do exactly that, but they will probably have related techniques. The simplest thing would be to use a sail to move sideways along a wave, using the trough of the wave a bit like a keep, thereby going to the left or right of the wind and wave direction. I don't think you could tack like this though.
$endgroup$
Depending on the sea conditions, you might be able to do something interesting with waves. Ignoring wind and air resistance for a moment, a craft like this will tend to slide down a wave, so if you are going the same way as the waves then propulsion is very simple. If you combine this with a sail then you could, if you are clever enough, use the difference in wave and wind movement to control your direction.
The Wandering Albatross does something like this to glide without flapping its wings. Your islanders are not going to do exactly that, but they will probably have related techniques. The simplest thing would be to use a sail to move sideways along a wave, using the trough of the wave a bit like a keep, thereby going to the left or right of the wind and wave direction. I don't think you could tack like this though.
answered 3 hours ago
Paul JohnsonPaul Johnson
40724
40724
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Super surfboard.
In answers so far the water repulsion has been considered a sort of ultrafloatation. Really, though, this tech would be super useful for propulsion. Imagine a surfboard. Only the back is treated - possible at an angle, not parallel to the water surface. The treated back repels water and so rides higher. One would have exactly the same effect with a regular surfboard if the back were physically higher than the front which is the case where you are on a wave. The net effect of the vectors is to push the board forward.
With this water repulsion tech, the surfboards will move forward even on still water. Because the mid to front of the board is in the water, one can still use friction of the board against the water to steer just as with a regular board. A skeg or keel could still be on the board to improve maneuverability - just don't treat that with repulsion tech.
The main benefit of this application of the water repulsion tech is awesomeness. It will not be like a bunch of dudes hunched in a Teflon whaleboat. It will be more like Mongols on horseback - but faster. The party surfing out from shore at sunrise will be cool as can be. If there are waves (maybe created by the water creature?) they can do some regular surfing too. They will hang ten with their harpoon lassos. It might even be possible to surf right up onto the sea creatures.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Take a mundane surfboard. Add a trivial weight transparent bulg hanging down from its back. This "repels water". Why doesn't your technique work? How is this magic technique fundamentally different?
$endgroup$
– Yakk
56 mins ago
$begingroup$
You describe buoyancy. The OP makes this akin to magnetism. You can float a magnet atop another magnet. You can push a magnet along a surface with another magnet. I thought this magic magnetlike repulsion was like this pushing / floating phenomenon. It would be interesting to make a mockup with a flat surface made of magnets S side up taped together and a HotWheels car with an S side down magnet under its back end. If the magnet sheet were deformable like water this would be a fine simulation.
$endgroup$
– Willk
5 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Super surfboard.
In answers so far the water repulsion has been considered a sort of ultrafloatation. Really, though, this tech would be super useful for propulsion. Imagine a surfboard. Only the back is treated - possible at an angle, not parallel to the water surface. The treated back repels water and so rides higher. One would have exactly the same effect with a regular surfboard if the back were physically higher than the front which is the case where you are on a wave. The net effect of the vectors is to push the board forward.
With this water repulsion tech, the surfboards will move forward even on still water. Because the mid to front of the board is in the water, one can still use friction of the board against the water to steer just as with a regular board. A skeg or keel could still be on the board to improve maneuverability - just don't treat that with repulsion tech.
The main benefit of this application of the water repulsion tech is awesomeness. It will not be like a bunch of dudes hunched in a Teflon whaleboat. It will be more like Mongols on horseback - but faster. The party surfing out from shore at sunrise will be cool as can be. If there are waves (maybe created by the water creature?) they can do some regular surfing too. They will hang ten with their harpoon lassos. It might even be possible to surf right up onto the sea creatures.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Take a mundane surfboard. Add a trivial weight transparent bulg hanging down from its back. This "repels water". Why doesn't your technique work? How is this magic technique fundamentally different?
$endgroup$
– Yakk
56 mins ago
$begingroup$
You describe buoyancy. The OP makes this akin to magnetism. You can float a magnet atop another magnet. You can push a magnet along a surface with another magnet. I thought this magic magnetlike repulsion was like this pushing / floating phenomenon. It would be interesting to make a mockup with a flat surface made of magnets S side up taped together and a HotWheels car with an S side down magnet under its back end. If the magnet sheet were deformable like water this would be a fine simulation.
$endgroup$
– Willk
5 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Super surfboard.
In answers so far the water repulsion has been considered a sort of ultrafloatation. Really, though, this tech would be super useful for propulsion. Imagine a surfboard. Only the back is treated - possible at an angle, not parallel to the water surface. The treated back repels water and so rides higher. One would have exactly the same effect with a regular surfboard if the back were physically higher than the front which is the case where you are on a wave. The net effect of the vectors is to push the board forward.
With this water repulsion tech, the surfboards will move forward even on still water. Because the mid to front of the board is in the water, one can still use friction of the board against the water to steer just as with a regular board. A skeg or keel could still be on the board to improve maneuverability - just don't treat that with repulsion tech.
The main benefit of this application of the water repulsion tech is awesomeness. It will not be like a bunch of dudes hunched in a Teflon whaleboat. It will be more like Mongols on horseback - but faster. The party surfing out from shore at sunrise will be cool as can be. If there are waves (maybe created by the water creature?) they can do some regular surfing too. They will hang ten with their harpoon lassos. It might even be possible to surf right up onto the sea creatures.
$endgroup$
Super surfboard.
In answers so far the water repulsion has been considered a sort of ultrafloatation. Really, though, this tech would be super useful for propulsion. Imagine a surfboard. Only the back is treated - possible at an angle, not parallel to the water surface. The treated back repels water and so rides higher. One would have exactly the same effect with a regular surfboard if the back were physically higher than the front which is the case where you are on a wave. The net effect of the vectors is to push the board forward.
With this water repulsion tech, the surfboards will move forward even on still water. Because the mid to front of the board is in the water, one can still use friction of the board against the water to steer just as with a regular board. A skeg or keel could still be on the board to improve maneuverability - just don't treat that with repulsion tech.
The main benefit of this application of the water repulsion tech is awesomeness. It will not be like a bunch of dudes hunched in a Teflon whaleboat. It will be more like Mongols on horseback - but faster. The party surfing out from shore at sunrise will be cool as can be. If there are waves (maybe created by the water creature?) they can do some regular surfing too. They will hang ten with their harpoon lassos. It might even be possible to surf right up onto the sea creatures.
answered 2 hours ago
WillkWillk
111k26207461
111k26207461
$begingroup$
Take a mundane surfboard. Add a trivial weight transparent bulg hanging down from its back. This "repels water". Why doesn't your technique work? How is this magic technique fundamentally different?
$endgroup$
– Yakk
56 mins ago
$begingroup$
You describe buoyancy. The OP makes this akin to magnetism. You can float a magnet atop another magnet. You can push a magnet along a surface with another magnet. I thought this magic magnetlike repulsion was like this pushing / floating phenomenon. It would be interesting to make a mockup with a flat surface made of magnets S side up taped together and a HotWheels car with an S side down magnet under its back end. If the magnet sheet were deformable like water this would be a fine simulation.
$endgroup$
– Willk
5 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take a mundane surfboard. Add a trivial weight transparent bulg hanging down from its back. This "repels water". Why doesn't your technique work? How is this magic technique fundamentally different?
$endgroup$
– Yakk
56 mins ago
$begingroup$
You describe buoyancy. The OP makes this akin to magnetism. You can float a magnet atop another magnet. You can push a magnet along a surface with another magnet. I thought this magic magnetlike repulsion was like this pushing / floating phenomenon. It would be interesting to make a mockup with a flat surface made of magnets S side up taped together and a HotWheels car with an S side down magnet under its back end. If the magnet sheet were deformable like water this would be a fine simulation.
$endgroup$
– Willk
5 mins ago
$begingroup$
Take a mundane surfboard. Add a trivial weight transparent bulg hanging down from its back. This "repels water". Why doesn't your technique work? How is this magic technique fundamentally different?
$endgroup$
– Yakk
56 mins ago
$begingroup$
Take a mundane surfboard. Add a trivial weight transparent bulg hanging down from its back. This "repels water". Why doesn't your technique work? How is this magic technique fundamentally different?
$endgroup$
– Yakk
56 mins ago
$begingroup$
You describe buoyancy. The OP makes this akin to magnetism. You can float a magnet atop another magnet. You can push a magnet along a surface with another magnet. I thought this magic magnetlike repulsion was like this pushing / floating phenomenon. It would be interesting to make a mockup with a flat surface made of magnets S side up taped together and a HotWheels car with an S side down magnet under its back end. If the magnet sheet were deformable like water this would be a fine simulation.
$endgroup$
– Willk
5 mins ago
$begingroup$
You describe buoyancy. The OP makes this akin to magnetism. You can float a magnet atop another magnet. You can push a magnet along a surface with another magnet. I thought this magic magnetlike repulsion was like this pushing / floating phenomenon. It would be interesting to make a mockup with a flat surface made of magnets S side up taped together and a HotWheels car with an S side down magnet under its back end. If the magnet sheet were deformable like water this would be a fine simulation.
$endgroup$
– Willk
5 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another way to use this magic substance for propulsion comes to mind, extrapolating on Willk's answer: A stone or piece of wood, with a hole bored through, and some of the substance smeared around the opening on one side would make a handy no-fuel water rocket, especially if it was put coaxially inside a tube of bamboo or something to direct the water flow.
You'd start the torpedo by sticking the front end into the water and pushing it down until a jet of water starts shooting out the back, and then lower the whole shebang into the water.
Basically I'm thinking of a ramjet-type operating principle, the water comes in pressurised to an extent by the intake shape and is vaporized by the cavitation effect after coming out of the stone nozzle, since under water the ring of well-placed magic substance (and it's toroid-shaped anti-water field) creates a no-water area right after the nozzle, leaving a small "hole" in the middle of the nozzle where the field is the weakest. There's more room in the exhaust section of the tube for the expanded vapor to escape, and less pressure, so the vapor escapes that way, creating suction for bringing in new water through the nozzle.
I don't know if this is really feasible give only a water-repelling magic substance, but sounds plausible enough for a magic-using world.
As a bonus, the question absolutely brings to mind the hydrophobe wizards of Krull from The Colour of Magic :)
New contributor
Roope is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another way to use this magic substance for propulsion comes to mind, extrapolating on Willk's answer: A stone or piece of wood, with a hole bored through, and some of the substance smeared around the opening on one side would make a handy no-fuel water rocket, especially if it was put coaxially inside a tube of bamboo or something to direct the water flow.
You'd start the torpedo by sticking the front end into the water and pushing it down until a jet of water starts shooting out the back, and then lower the whole shebang into the water.
Basically I'm thinking of a ramjet-type operating principle, the water comes in pressurised to an extent by the intake shape and is vaporized by the cavitation effect after coming out of the stone nozzle, since under water the ring of well-placed magic substance (and it's toroid-shaped anti-water field) creates a no-water area right after the nozzle, leaving a small "hole" in the middle of the nozzle where the field is the weakest. There's more room in the exhaust section of the tube for the expanded vapor to escape, and less pressure, so the vapor escapes that way, creating suction for bringing in new water through the nozzle.
I don't know if this is really feasible give only a water-repelling magic substance, but sounds plausible enough for a magic-using world.
As a bonus, the question absolutely brings to mind the hydrophobe wizards of Krull from The Colour of Magic :)
New contributor
Roope is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another way to use this magic substance for propulsion comes to mind, extrapolating on Willk's answer: A stone or piece of wood, with a hole bored through, and some of the substance smeared around the opening on one side would make a handy no-fuel water rocket, especially if it was put coaxially inside a tube of bamboo or something to direct the water flow.
You'd start the torpedo by sticking the front end into the water and pushing it down until a jet of water starts shooting out the back, and then lower the whole shebang into the water.
Basically I'm thinking of a ramjet-type operating principle, the water comes in pressurised to an extent by the intake shape and is vaporized by the cavitation effect after coming out of the stone nozzle, since under water the ring of well-placed magic substance (and it's toroid-shaped anti-water field) creates a no-water area right after the nozzle, leaving a small "hole" in the middle of the nozzle where the field is the weakest. There's more room in the exhaust section of the tube for the expanded vapor to escape, and less pressure, so the vapor escapes that way, creating suction for bringing in new water through the nozzle.
I don't know if this is really feasible give only a water-repelling magic substance, but sounds plausible enough for a magic-using world.
As a bonus, the question absolutely brings to mind the hydrophobe wizards of Krull from The Colour of Magic :)
New contributor
Roope is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Another way to use this magic substance for propulsion comes to mind, extrapolating on Willk's answer: A stone or piece of wood, with a hole bored through, and some of the substance smeared around the opening on one side would make a handy no-fuel water rocket, especially if it was put coaxially inside a tube of bamboo or something to direct the water flow.
You'd start the torpedo by sticking the front end into the water and pushing it down until a jet of water starts shooting out the back, and then lower the whole shebang into the water.
Basically I'm thinking of a ramjet-type operating principle, the water comes in pressurised to an extent by the intake shape and is vaporized by the cavitation effect after coming out of the stone nozzle, since under water the ring of well-placed magic substance (and it's toroid-shaped anti-water field) creates a no-water area right after the nozzle, leaving a small "hole" in the middle of the nozzle where the field is the weakest. There's more room in the exhaust section of the tube for the expanded vapor to escape, and less pressure, so the vapor escapes that way, creating suction for bringing in new water through the nozzle.
I don't know if this is really feasible give only a water-repelling magic substance, but sounds plausible enough for a magic-using world.
As a bonus, the question absolutely brings to mind the hydrophobe wizards of Krull from The Colour of Magic :)
New contributor
Roope is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Roope is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 1 hour ago
RoopeRoope
112
112
New contributor
Roope is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Roope is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Roope is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Being able to aim your craft while sailing relies on balancing the forces of the wind with the forces you apply on the water.
The boat is long and narrow, and has much much more resistance to movement perpendicular to its hull than parallel. When you add a force from the sails, it lets you "lever" that wind force into force going the direction you want. In extreme "tacking" cases you are even sailing into the wind using its force to pull you towards it!
This means that naive designs won't work. A flat-bottomed boat will act more like a balloon than a ship, and will be tossed around by the wind in the direction the wind goes.
While keels can help, that keel needs to be reinforced against the forces and large enough to provide the force you need all alone; in effect you end up with a hull.
But not all is lost. Under newton's law, all forces generate equal and opposite reactions.
Make the ship long and narrow. Have it force a line into the water, actually shaping the water and forming an impression.
Going forward a relatively narrow section needs to be moved, while going sideways a much larger section of water.
So you'll want the ship to be shaped much like a hull; or, more accurately, so that the "virtual" hull around it caused by the repulsion field is shaped like a conventional hull.
Defence against waves acts similarly, except the shape we care about is the virtual hull instead of the hull. Note that "holes" in the virtual hull may be harder than holes in a hull if the effect radiates out in all directions.
If the "virtual" hull can be shaped without shaping the hull things can get interesting. Does the effect end when you leave line of sight? Then you could do interesting things with "covers" to turn off/on the effect.
Imagine a tube picking up water. It fills a chamber. Then the entry tube is closed, the repulsion field is "turned on", firing the water out the rear. Then it is turned off, feeding more water into the chamber.
What more, the "hull" of the ship need not be solid. It could be a net of treated material held rigid in a frame. The virtual hull would be far smoother than the net, and would have no gaps.
Rowing could be done out holes in this "hull", extending through the virtual hull unopposed, and pushing against the water. The surface area of rowing would be larger than on a conventional ship, who is mostly limited by the water-air barrier around the ship.
The oars themselves could be treated with this substance and never themselves get wet. If you could cover up the effect, "oars" that permit that could be used for propulsion, generating an effect similar to the "jet" above.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Being able to aim your craft while sailing relies on balancing the forces of the wind with the forces you apply on the water.
The boat is long and narrow, and has much much more resistance to movement perpendicular to its hull than parallel. When you add a force from the sails, it lets you "lever" that wind force into force going the direction you want. In extreme "tacking" cases you are even sailing into the wind using its force to pull you towards it!
This means that naive designs won't work. A flat-bottomed boat will act more like a balloon than a ship, and will be tossed around by the wind in the direction the wind goes.
While keels can help, that keel needs to be reinforced against the forces and large enough to provide the force you need all alone; in effect you end up with a hull.
But not all is lost. Under newton's law, all forces generate equal and opposite reactions.
Make the ship long and narrow. Have it force a line into the water, actually shaping the water and forming an impression.
Going forward a relatively narrow section needs to be moved, while going sideways a much larger section of water.
So you'll want the ship to be shaped much like a hull; or, more accurately, so that the "virtual" hull around it caused by the repulsion field is shaped like a conventional hull.
Defence against waves acts similarly, except the shape we care about is the virtual hull instead of the hull. Note that "holes" in the virtual hull may be harder than holes in a hull if the effect radiates out in all directions.
If the "virtual" hull can be shaped without shaping the hull things can get interesting. Does the effect end when you leave line of sight? Then you could do interesting things with "covers" to turn off/on the effect.
Imagine a tube picking up water. It fills a chamber. Then the entry tube is closed, the repulsion field is "turned on", firing the water out the rear. Then it is turned off, feeding more water into the chamber.
What more, the "hull" of the ship need not be solid. It could be a net of treated material held rigid in a frame. The virtual hull would be far smoother than the net, and would have no gaps.
Rowing could be done out holes in this "hull", extending through the virtual hull unopposed, and pushing against the water. The surface area of rowing would be larger than on a conventional ship, who is mostly limited by the water-air barrier around the ship.
The oars themselves could be treated with this substance and never themselves get wet. If you could cover up the effect, "oars" that permit that could be used for propulsion, generating an effect similar to the "jet" above.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Being able to aim your craft while sailing relies on balancing the forces of the wind with the forces you apply on the water.
The boat is long and narrow, and has much much more resistance to movement perpendicular to its hull than parallel. When you add a force from the sails, it lets you "lever" that wind force into force going the direction you want. In extreme "tacking" cases you are even sailing into the wind using its force to pull you towards it!
This means that naive designs won't work. A flat-bottomed boat will act more like a balloon than a ship, and will be tossed around by the wind in the direction the wind goes.
While keels can help, that keel needs to be reinforced against the forces and large enough to provide the force you need all alone; in effect you end up with a hull.
But not all is lost. Under newton's law, all forces generate equal and opposite reactions.
Make the ship long and narrow. Have it force a line into the water, actually shaping the water and forming an impression.
Going forward a relatively narrow section needs to be moved, while going sideways a much larger section of water.
So you'll want the ship to be shaped much like a hull; or, more accurately, so that the "virtual" hull around it caused by the repulsion field is shaped like a conventional hull.
Defence against waves acts similarly, except the shape we care about is the virtual hull instead of the hull. Note that "holes" in the virtual hull may be harder than holes in a hull if the effect radiates out in all directions.
If the "virtual" hull can be shaped without shaping the hull things can get interesting. Does the effect end when you leave line of sight? Then you could do interesting things with "covers" to turn off/on the effect.
Imagine a tube picking up water. It fills a chamber. Then the entry tube is closed, the repulsion field is "turned on", firing the water out the rear. Then it is turned off, feeding more water into the chamber.
What more, the "hull" of the ship need not be solid. It could be a net of treated material held rigid in a frame. The virtual hull would be far smoother than the net, and would have no gaps.
Rowing could be done out holes in this "hull", extending through the virtual hull unopposed, and pushing against the water. The surface area of rowing would be larger than on a conventional ship, who is mostly limited by the water-air barrier around the ship.
The oars themselves could be treated with this substance and never themselves get wet. If you could cover up the effect, "oars" that permit that could be used for propulsion, generating an effect similar to the "jet" above.
$endgroup$
Being able to aim your craft while sailing relies on balancing the forces of the wind with the forces you apply on the water.
The boat is long and narrow, and has much much more resistance to movement perpendicular to its hull than parallel. When you add a force from the sails, it lets you "lever" that wind force into force going the direction you want. In extreme "tacking" cases you are even sailing into the wind using its force to pull you towards it!
This means that naive designs won't work. A flat-bottomed boat will act more like a balloon than a ship, and will be tossed around by the wind in the direction the wind goes.
While keels can help, that keel needs to be reinforced against the forces and large enough to provide the force you need all alone; in effect you end up with a hull.
But not all is lost. Under newton's law, all forces generate equal and opposite reactions.
Make the ship long and narrow. Have it force a line into the water, actually shaping the water and forming an impression.
Going forward a relatively narrow section needs to be moved, while going sideways a much larger section of water.
So you'll want the ship to be shaped much like a hull; or, more accurately, so that the "virtual" hull around it caused by the repulsion field is shaped like a conventional hull.
Defence against waves acts similarly, except the shape we care about is the virtual hull instead of the hull. Note that "holes" in the virtual hull may be harder than holes in a hull if the effect radiates out in all directions.
If the "virtual" hull can be shaped without shaping the hull things can get interesting. Does the effect end when you leave line of sight? Then you could do interesting things with "covers" to turn off/on the effect.
Imagine a tube picking up water. It fills a chamber. Then the entry tube is closed, the repulsion field is "turned on", firing the water out the rear. Then it is turned off, feeding more water into the chamber.
What more, the "hull" of the ship need not be solid. It could be a net of treated material held rigid in a frame. The virtual hull would be far smoother than the net, and would have no gaps.
Rowing could be done out holes in this "hull", extending through the virtual hull unopposed, and pushing against the water. The surface area of rowing would be larger than on a conventional ship, who is mostly limited by the water-air barrier around the ship.
The oars themselves could be treated with this substance and never themselves get wet. If you could cover up the effect, "oars" that permit that could be used for propulsion, generating an effect similar to the "jet" above.
answered 26 mins ago
YakkYakk
8,59411237
8,59411237
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the sake of concision, I'm going to refer to the anti-water magnetic coating as AWMC. I'm assuming that AWMC is polar, that it can be turned off or directed, or that the repulsion is significantly stronger on one side, since otherwise the crew wouldn't be able to go near once it was applied (humans being mostly water). I'm also assuming that the AWMC resistance force is quite powerful.
The optimal hull design is to stick to regular hull designs just with a thin layer of AWMC that functions as frictionless coating + waterproofing.
The real genius is using AWMC for propulsion, since it's been shown by our resident sailors and kayakers that traditional forms of naval propulsion require friction/resistance. Introducing... the WHIFFLE MOTOR (patent pending)!! In its simplest form, the whiffle motor is a board with holes poked in it and AWMC applied to the back side. When it's first dropped into the water, the board generates thrust by resisting the water, but this creates a vacuum/pressure gradient in the water, most strongly right at the transition point where water comes in through the intake holes.
Water is pulled in by the gradient and then pushed backwards by the AWMC coating, and the cycle begins.
Better designs streamline the overall setup so that the most water possible is pushed backwards the most evenly, thus generating the most even and powerful thrust.
In my unprofessional opinion, the best designs probably would probably look like a jet engine or turbofan engine, making it so that water only comes in from the intake and all the water is ejected in a smooth stream.
Steering is now a question of having some lesser boards that can be angled more freely.
Basically, you now have spacecraft in a roughly 2D plane. Speed is limited by the direct resistance that water provides to being pushed apart, so you don't get to go stupidly fast just with a basic WHIFFLE MOTOR (patent pending).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the sake of concision, I'm going to refer to the anti-water magnetic coating as AWMC. I'm assuming that AWMC is polar, that it can be turned off or directed, or that the repulsion is significantly stronger on one side, since otherwise the crew wouldn't be able to go near once it was applied (humans being mostly water). I'm also assuming that the AWMC resistance force is quite powerful.
The optimal hull design is to stick to regular hull designs just with a thin layer of AWMC that functions as frictionless coating + waterproofing.
The real genius is using AWMC for propulsion, since it's been shown by our resident sailors and kayakers that traditional forms of naval propulsion require friction/resistance. Introducing... the WHIFFLE MOTOR (patent pending)!! In its simplest form, the whiffle motor is a board with holes poked in it and AWMC applied to the back side. When it's first dropped into the water, the board generates thrust by resisting the water, but this creates a vacuum/pressure gradient in the water, most strongly right at the transition point where water comes in through the intake holes.
Water is pulled in by the gradient and then pushed backwards by the AWMC coating, and the cycle begins.
Better designs streamline the overall setup so that the most water possible is pushed backwards the most evenly, thus generating the most even and powerful thrust.
In my unprofessional opinion, the best designs probably would probably look like a jet engine or turbofan engine, making it so that water only comes in from the intake and all the water is ejected in a smooth stream.
Steering is now a question of having some lesser boards that can be angled more freely.
Basically, you now have spacecraft in a roughly 2D plane. Speed is limited by the direct resistance that water provides to being pushed apart, so you don't get to go stupidly fast just with a basic WHIFFLE MOTOR (patent pending).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the sake of concision, I'm going to refer to the anti-water magnetic coating as AWMC. I'm assuming that AWMC is polar, that it can be turned off or directed, or that the repulsion is significantly stronger on one side, since otherwise the crew wouldn't be able to go near once it was applied (humans being mostly water). I'm also assuming that the AWMC resistance force is quite powerful.
The optimal hull design is to stick to regular hull designs just with a thin layer of AWMC that functions as frictionless coating + waterproofing.
The real genius is using AWMC for propulsion, since it's been shown by our resident sailors and kayakers that traditional forms of naval propulsion require friction/resistance. Introducing... the WHIFFLE MOTOR (patent pending)!! In its simplest form, the whiffle motor is a board with holes poked in it and AWMC applied to the back side. When it's first dropped into the water, the board generates thrust by resisting the water, but this creates a vacuum/pressure gradient in the water, most strongly right at the transition point where water comes in through the intake holes.
Water is pulled in by the gradient and then pushed backwards by the AWMC coating, and the cycle begins.
Better designs streamline the overall setup so that the most water possible is pushed backwards the most evenly, thus generating the most even and powerful thrust.
In my unprofessional opinion, the best designs probably would probably look like a jet engine or turbofan engine, making it so that water only comes in from the intake and all the water is ejected in a smooth stream.
Steering is now a question of having some lesser boards that can be angled more freely.
Basically, you now have spacecraft in a roughly 2D plane. Speed is limited by the direct resistance that water provides to being pushed apart, so you don't get to go stupidly fast just with a basic WHIFFLE MOTOR (patent pending).
$endgroup$
For the sake of concision, I'm going to refer to the anti-water magnetic coating as AWMC. I'm assuming that AWMC is polar, that it can be turned off or directed, or that the repulsion is significantly stronger on one side, since otherwise the crew wouldn't be able to go near once it was applied (humans being mostly water). I'm also assuming that the AWMC resistance force is quite powerful.
The optimal hull design is to stick to regular hull designs just with a thin layer of AWMC that functions as frictionless coating + waterproofing.
The real genius is using AWMC for propulsion, since it's been shown by our resident sailors and kayakers that traditional forms of naval propulsion require friction/resistance. Introducing... the WHIFFLE MOTOR (patent pending)!! In its simplest form, the whiffle motor is a board with holes poked in it and AWMC applied to the back side. When it's first dropped into the water, the board generates thrust by resisting the water, but this creates a vacuum/pressure gradient in the water, most strongly right at the transition point where water comes in through the intake holes.
Water is pulled in by the gradient and then pushed backwards by the AWMC coating, and the cycle begins.
Better designs streamline the overall setup so that the most water possible is pushed backwards the most evenly, thus generating the most even and powerful thrust.
In my unprofessional opinion, the best designs probably would probably look like a jet engine or turbofan engine, making it so that water only comes in from the intake and all the water is ejected in a smooth stream.
Steering is now a question of having some lesser boards that can be angled more freely.
Basically, you now have spacecraft in a roughly 2D plane. Speed is limited by the direct resistance that water provides to being pushed apart, so you don't get to go stupidly fast just with a basic WHIFFLE MOTOR (patent pending).
answered 13 mins ago
JeutnargJeutnarg
3,068720
3,068720
add a comment |
add a comment |
InferiorAuthor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
InferiorAuthor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
InferiorAuthor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
InferiorAuthor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140699%2flogistics-of-a-hovering-watercraft-in-a-fantasy-setting%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Can we get a bit more information on this prey? How large are they, what kind of attacks do they utilize?
$endgroup$
– Mormacil
18 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
"This allows boats to hover above the surface of the water": no it doesn't. Water is a fluid. The craft will float just like any other boat, with the difference that the volume of the hull will be somewhat larger corresponding to the strength of the water-repelling field.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
18 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@AlexP Either that, or it'd just immediately sink right down to the bottom as it repels the water underneath it, sinks a little bit, repels the new water underneath it, sinks a little more, ad infinitum down to the bottom of the ocean.
$endgroup$
– nick012000
13 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I'm with AlexP here. If you repel the water, the water repels you. So it will mostly work the same way than a real boat, with the exception of being unafected by the currents. A wave will still be a wave and hit the boat, just from farther away. The only clear advantage is that you'll stay dry, assuming the boat didn't flip. @nick012000 The water you repel will be blocked by the density of the ocean and will push back on the boat, the same way a boat already does with gravity only (Archimedes principle and all that).
$endgroup$
– Echox
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Since we have Aron the sailing instructor in the game, I thought I should offer the kayaker's perspective on this. A frictionless hull would be an uncontrollable nightmare. Everything you do is a balance of forces between paddle and hull resistance, taking away one of those factors would make it hell to control.
$endgroup$
– Separatrix
3 hours ago