Fastest light-weight image viewer over forwarded x11 session (linux)How to quickly view huge PNG images in OS...
How can atoms be electrically neutral when there is a difference in the positions of the charges?
Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?
Pure Functions: Does "No Side Effects" Imply "Always Same Output, Given Same Input"?
Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?
What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?
School performs periodic password audits. Is my password compromised?
Does "legal poaching" exist?
If a set is open, does that imply that it has no boundary points?
Toast materialize
Wrap all numerics in JSON with quotes
Graphing random points on the XY-plane
Why doesn't Object.keys return a keyof type in TypeScript?
Non-Italian European mafias in USA?
VAT refund for a conference ticket in Sweden
Is 長 in Japanese related to “naga” in Thai and Sanskrit?
Where is the fallacy here?
In iTunes 12 on macOS, how can I reset the skip count of a song?
What could trigger powerful quakes on icy world?
Is there a full canon version of Tyrion's jackass/honeycomb joke?
Are there any other Chaos-worshipping races?
Real life puzzle: Unknown alphabet or shorthand
Is it possible to make a clamp function shorter than a ternary in JS?
In Adventurer's League, is it possible to keep the Ring of Winter if you manage to acquire it in the Tomb of Annihilation adventure?
Skis versus snow shoes - when to choose which for travelling the backcountry?
Fastest light-weight image viewer over forwarded x11 session (linux)
How to quickly view huge PNG images in OS X?Linux: image viewer with transparent window?Is there a software which will let me save an album view of graphic files?Viewing images in a web browserFastest browser to run over a forwarded X11 sessionUnable to locate image viewers that integrate geotag information into the viewing experienceWay to automatically compress images pasted into Outlook emails?keyboard driven image selector and JPEG viewer for Windows 10Why do some image viewers display color differently?Why is X11 forwarding so inefficient?
I have a slow network connection over which I'm forwarding x11 over ssh.
I want to view images on the remote host (Ubuntu) quickly and efficiently.
I'm looking for an image viewer that will take into account the image viewer window's resolution and downsize the image before sending it over the network, instead of sending the full size image.
The images I want to view will be around 5MB and I only need to be able to browse through tiny thumbnails of the images to identify the image I'm looking for.
It is not necessary to be able to see more than one image at a time. Highest speed over slow network connection is the priority.
Thanks!
Matthew
EDIT: It's possible that the way x11 forwarding works, only the image at the display resolution will be transferred anyway. If that's true, please confirm and the question still stands for which image viewer will be the fastest over a slow connection
images x11-forwarding image-viewer connection lightweight
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I have a slow network connection over which I'm forwarding x11 over ssh.
I want to view images on the remote host (Ubuntu) quickly and efficiently.
I'm looking for an image viewer that will take into account the image viewer window's resolution and downsize the image before sending it over the network, instead of sending the full size image.
The images I want to view will be around 5MB and I only need to be able to browse through tiny thumbnails of the images to identify the image I'm looking for.
It is not necessary to be able to see more than one image at a time. Highest speed over slow network connection is the priority.
Thanks!
Matthew
EDIT: It's possible that the way x11 forwarding works, only the image at the display resolution will be transferred anyway. If that's true, please confirm and the question still stands for which image viewer will be the fastest over a slow connection
images x11-forwarding image-viewer connection lightweight
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
I usedisplay
from the Imagemagick package
– artistoex
Jun 11 '12 at 23:10
aristotex I didn't see your comment. Probably display and mogrify together are the best solution
– Bruno9779
Jun 11 '12 at 23:25
Tried display from the imagemagick package and it was unfortunately horrendously slow. Took about 1m30s to open a 500x332 image. When I used the -resize option to downsize the image to 100px wide there was no observable performance increase. I tried gpicview on the same image (500x332 resolution) and it only took around 30 seconds to open.
– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:58
add a comment |
I have a slow network connection over which I'm forwarding x11 over ssh.
I want to view images on the remote host (Ubuntu) quickly and efficiently.
I'm looking for an image viewer that will take into account the image viewer window's resolution and downsize the image before sending it over the network, instead of sending the full size image.
The images I want to view will be around 5MB and I only need to be able to browse through tiny thumbnails of the images to identify the image I'm looking for.
It is not necessary to be able to see more than one image at a time. Highest speed over slow network connection is the priority.
Thanks!
Matthew
EDIT: It's possible that the way x11 forwarding works, only the image at the display resolution will be transferred anyway. If that's true, please confirm and the question still stands for which image viewer will be the fastest over a slow connection
images x11-forwarding image-viewer connection lightweight
I have a slow network connection over which I'm forwarding x11 over ssh.
I want to view images on the remote host (Ubuntu) quickly and efficiently.
I'm looking for an image viewer that will take into account the image viewer window's resolution and downsize the image before sending it over the network, instead of sending the full size image.
The images I want to view will be around 5MB and I only need to be able to browse through tiny thumbnails of the images to identify the image I'm looking for.
It is not necessary to be able to see more than one image at a time. Highest speed over slow network connection is the priority.
Thanks!
Matthew
EDIT: It's possible that the way x11 forwarding works, only the image at the display resolution will be transferred anyway. If that's true, please confirm and the question still stands for which image viewer will be the fastest over a slow connection
images x11-forwarding image-viewer connection lightweight
images x11-forwarding image-viewer connection lightweight
asked Jun 11 '12 at 22:21
MatthewMatthew
701724
701724
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
I usedisplay
from the Imagemagick package
– artistoex
Jun 11 '12 at 23:10
aristotex I didn't see your comment. Probably display and mogrify together are the best solution
– Bruno9779
Jun 11 '12 at 23:25
Tried display from the imagemagick package and it was unfortunately horrendously slow. Took about 1m30s to open a 500x332 image. When I used the -resize option to downsize the image to 100px wide there was no observable performance increase. I tried gpicview on the same image (500x332 resolution) and it only took around 30 seconds to open.
– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:58
add a comment |
I usedisplay
from the Imagemagick package
– artistoex
Jun 11 '12 at 23:10
aristotex I didn't see your comment. Probably display and mogrify together are the best solution
– Bruno9779
Jun 11 '12 at 23:25
Tried display from the imagemagick package and it was unfortunately horrendously slow. Took about 1m30s to open a 500x332 image. When I used the -resize option to downsize the image to 100px wide there was no observable performance increase. I tried gpicview on the same image (500x332 resolution) and it only took around 30 seconds to open.
– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:58
I use
display
from the Imagemagick package– artistoex
Jun 11 '12 at 23:10
I use
display
from the Imagemagick package– artistoex
Jun 11 '12 at 23:10
aristotex I didn't see your comment. Probably display and mogrify together are the best solution
– Bruno9779
Jun 11 '12 at 23:25
aristotex I didn't see your comment. Probably display and mogrify together are the best solution
– Bruno9779
Jun 11 '12 at 23:25
Tried display from the imagemagick package and it was unfortunately horrendously slow. Took about 1m30s to open a 500x332 image. When I used the -resize option to downsize the image to 100px wide there was no observable performance increase. I tried gpicview on the same image (500x332 resolution) and it only took around 30 seconds to open.
– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:58
Tried display from the imagemagick package and it was unfortunately horrendously slow. Took about 1m30s to open a 500x332 image. When I used the -resize option to downsize the image to 100px wide there was no observable performance increase. I tried gpicview on the same image (500x332 resolution) and it only took around 30 seconds to open.
– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:58
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I would tackle this differently.
The data overhead for an image viewer is minimal compared to the size of your pics.
Instead I would install imagemagick on the remote machine and resize a copy of the pics with mogrify.
cd yourpicturesfolder
mkdir thumbs
cp * /thumbs
cd /thumbs
mogrify -resize 150 *.jpg
150 is the width in pixels, I think it is a good size for what you need: about 50kb and viewable.
Of course this implies that you have admin access to the remote machine and enough disk space for the copies.
I have root access, and this is a great first half to the question, but once I have the small images what application should I use to view them? I don't want to just copy them all over ftp because there could be hundreds of images and I might find what I'm looking for in the first dozen.
– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:55
feh
– Jacob
Jan 22 '17 at 0:20
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f435497%2ffastest-light-weight-image-viewer-over-forwarded-x11-session-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I would tackle this differently.
The data overhead for an image viewer is minimal compared to the size of your pics.
Instead I would install imagemagick on the remote machine and resize a copy of the pics with mogrify.
cd yourpicturesfolder
mkdir thumbs
cp * /thumbs
cd /thumbs
mogrify -resize 150 *.jpg
150 is the width in pixels, I think it is a good size for what you need: about 50kb and viewable.
Of course this implies that you have admin access to the remote machine and enough disk space for the copies.
I have root access, and this is a great first half to the question, but once I have the small images what application should I use to view them? I don't want to just copy them all over ftp because there could be hundreds of images and I might find what I'm looking for in the first dozen.
– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:55
feh
– Jacob
Jan 22 '17 at 0:20
add a comment |
I would tackle this differently.
The data overhead for an image viewer is minimal compared to the size of your pics.
Instead I would install imagemagick on the remote machine and resize a copy of the pics with mogrify.
cd yourpicturesfolder
mkdir thumbs
cp * /thumbs
cd /thumbs
mogrify -resize 150 *.jpg
150 is the width in pixels, I think it is a good size for what you need: about 50kb and viewable.
Of course this implies that you have admin access to the remote machine and enough disk space for the copies.
I have root access, and this is a great first half to the question, but once I have the small images what application should I use to view them? I don't want to just copy them all over ftp because there could be hundreds of images and I might find what I'm looking for in the first dozen.
– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:55
feh
– Jacob
Jan 22 '17 at 0:20
add a comment |
I would tackle this differently.
The data overhead for an image viewer is minimal compared to the size of your pics.
Instead I would install imagemagick on the remote machine and resize a copy of the pics with mogrify.
cd yourpicturesfolder
mkdir thumbs
cp * /thumbs
cd /thumbs
mogrify -resize 150 *.jpg
150 is the width in pixels, I think it is a good size for what you need: about 50kb and viewable.
Of course this implies that you have admin access to the remote machine and enough disk space for the copies.
I would tackle this differently.
The data overhead for an image viewer is minimal compared to the size of your pics.
Instead I would install imagemagick on the remote machine and resize a copy of the pics with mogrify.
cd yourpicturesfolder
mkdir thumbs
cp * /thumbs
cd /thumbs
mogrify -resize 150 *.jpg
150 is the width in pixels, I think it is a good size for what you need: about 50kb and viewable.
Of course this implies that you have admin access to the remote machine and enough disk space for the copies.
edited Jun 11 '12 at 23:52
answered Jun 11 '12 at 23:19
Bruno9779Bruno9779
1,152822
1,152822
I have root access, and this is a great first half to the question, but once I have the small images what application should I use to view them? I don't want to just copy them all over ftp because there could be hundreds of images and I might find what I'm looking for in the first dozen.
– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:55
feh
– Jacob
Jan 22 '17 at 0:20
add a comment |
I have root access, and this is a great first half to the question, but once I have the small images what application should I use to view them? I don't want to just copy them all over ftp because there could be hundreds of images and I might find what I'm looking for in the first dozen.
– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:55
feh
– Jacob
Jan 22 '17 at 0:20
I have root access, and this is a great first half to the question, but once I have the small images what application should I use to view them? I don't want to just copy them all over ftp because there could be hundreds of images and I might find what I'm looking for in the first dozen.
– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:55
I have root access, and this is a great first half to the question, but once I have the small images what application should I use to view them? I don't want to just copy them all over ftp because there could be hundreds of images and I might find what I'm looking for in the first dozen.
– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:55
feh
– Jacob
Jan 22 '17 at 0:20
feh
– Jacob
Jan 22 '17 at 0:20
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f435497%2ffastest-light-weight-image-viewer-over-forwarded-x11-session-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I use
display
from the Imagemagick package– artistoex
Jun 11 '12 at 23:10
aristotex I didn't see your comment. Probably display and mogrify together are the best solution
– Bruno9779
Jun 11 '12 at 23:25
Tried display from the imagemagick package and it was unfortunately horrendously slow. Took about 1m30s to open a 500x332 image. When I used the -resize option to downsize the image to 100px wide there was no observable performance increase. I tried gpicview on the same image (500x332 resolution) and it only took around 30 seconds to open.
– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:58