Fastest light-weight image viewer over forwarded x11 session (linux)How to quickly view huge PNG images in OS...

How can atoms be electrically neutral when there is a difference in the positions of the charges?

Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?

Pure Functions: Does "No Side Effects" Imply "Always Same Output, Given Same Input"?

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

School performs periodic password audits. Is my password compromised?

Does "legal poaching" exist?

If a set is open, does that imply that it has no boundary points?

Toast materialize

Wrap all numerics in JSON with quotes

Graphing random points on the XY-plane

Why doesn't Object.keys return a keyof type in TypeScript?

Non-Italian European mafias in USA?

VAT refund for a conference ticket in Sweden

Is 長 in Japanese related to “naga” in Thai and Sanskrit?

Where is the fallacy here?

In iTunes 12 on macOS, how can I reset the skip count of a song?

What could trigger powerful quakes on icy world?

Is there a full canon version of Tyrion's jackass/honeycomb joke?

Are there any other Chaos-worshipping races?

Real life puzzle: Unknown alphabet or shorthand

Is it possible to make a clamp function shorter than a ternary in JS?

In Adventurer's League, is it possible to keep the Ring of Winter if you manage to acquire it in the Tomb of Annihilation adventure?

Skis versus snow shoes - when to choose which for travelling the backcountry?



Fastest light-weight image viewer over forwarded x11 session (linux)


How to quickly view huge PNG images in OS X?Linux: image viewer with transparent window?Is there a software which will let me save an album view of graphic files?Viewing images in a web browserFastest browser to run over a forwarded X11 sessionUnable to locate image viewers that integrate geotag information into the viewing experienceWay to automatically compress images pasted into Outlook emails?keyboard driven image selector and JPEG viewer for Windows 10Why do some image viewers display color differently?Why is X11 forwarding so inefficient?













2















I have a slow network connection over which I'm forwarding x11 over ssh.



I want to view images on the remote host (Ubuntu) quickly and efficiently.



I'm looking for an image viewer that will take into account the image viewer window's resolution and downsize the image before sending it over the network, instead of sending the full size image.



The images I want to view will be around 5MB and I only need to be able to browse through tiny thumbnails of the images to identify the image I'm looking for.



It is not necessary to be able to see more than one image at a time. Highest speed over slow network connection is the priority.



Thanks!
Matthew



EDIT: It's possible that the way x11 forwarding works, only the image at the display resolution will be transferred anyway. If that's true, please confirm and the question still stands for which image viewer will be the fastest over a slow connection










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
















  • I use display from the Imagemagick package

    – artistoex
    Jun 11 '12 at 23:10











  • aristotex I didn't see your comment. Probably display and mogrify together are the best solution

    – Bruno9779
    Jun 11 '12 at 23:25











  • Tried display from the imagemagick package and it was unfortunately horrendously slow. Took about 1m30s to open a 500x332 image. When I used the -resize option to downsize the image to 100px wide there was no observable performance increase. I tried gpicview on the same image (500x332 resolution) and it only took around 30 seconds to open.

    – Matthew
    Jun 12 '12 at 16:58
















2















I have a slow network connection over which I'm forwarding x11 over ssh.



I want to view images on the remote host (Ubuntu) quickly and efficiently.



I'm looking for an image viewer that will take into account the image viewer window's resolution and downsize the image before sending it over the network, instead of sending the full size image.



The images I want to view will be around 5MB and I only need to be able to browse through tiny thumbnails of the images to identify the image I'm looking for.



It is not necessary to be able to see more than one image at a time. Highest speed over slow network connection is the priority.



Thanks!
Matthew



EDIT: It's possible that the way x11 forwarding works, only the image at the display resolution will be transferred anyway. If that's true, please confirm and the question still stands for which image viewer will be the fastest over a slow connection










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
















  • I use display from the Imagemagick package

    – artistoex
    Jun 11 '12 at 23:10











  • aristotex I didn't see your comment. Probably display and mogrify together are the best solution

    – Bruno9779
    Jun 11 '12 at 23:25











  • Tried display from the imagemagick package and it was unfortunately horrendously slow. Took about 1m30s to open a 500x332 image. When I used the -resize option to downsize the image to 100px wide there was no observable performance increase. I tried gpicview on the same image (500x332 resolution) and it only took around 30 seconds to open.

    – Matthew
    Jun 12 '12 at 16:58














2












2








2


1






I have a slow network connection over which I'm forwarding x11 over ssh.



I want to view images on the remote host (Ubuntu) quickly and efficiently.



I'm looking for an image viewer that will take into account the image viewer window's resolution and downsize the image before sending it over the network, instead of sending the full size image.



The images I want to view will be around 5MB and I only need to be able to browse through tiny thumbnails of the images to identify the image I'm looking for.



It is not necessary to be able to see more than one image at a time. Highest speed over slow network connection is the priority.



Thanks!
Matthew



EDIT: It's possible that the way x11 forwarding works, only the image at the display resolution will be transferred anyway. If that's true, please confirm and the question still stands for which image viewer will be the fastest over a slow connection










share|improve this question














I have a slow network connection over which I'm forwarding x11 over ssh.



I want to view images on the remote host (Ubuntu) quickly and efficiently.



I'm looking for an image viewer that will take into account the image viewer window's resolution and downsize the image before sending it over the network, instead of sending the full size image.



The images I want to view will be around 5MB and I only need to be able to browse through tiny thumbnails of the images to identify the image I'm looking for.



It is not necessary to be able to see more than one image at a time. Highest speed over slow network connection is the priority.



Thanks!
Matthew



EDIT: It's possible that the way x11 forwarding works, only the image at the display resolution will be transferred anyway. If that's true, please confirm and the question still stands for which image viewer will be the fastest over a slow connection







images x11-forwarding image-viewer connection lightweight






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jun 11 '12 at 22:21









MatthewMatthew

701724




701724





bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • I use display from the Imagemagick package

    – artistoex
    Jun 11 '12 at 23:10











  • aristotex I didn't see your comment. Probably display and mogrify together are the best solution

    – Bruno9779
    Jun 11 '12 at 23:25











  • Tried display from the imagemagick package and it was unfortunately horrendously slow. Took about 1m30s to open a 500x332 image. When I used the -resize option to downsize the image to 100px wide there was no observable performance increase. I tried gpicview on the same image (500x332 resolution) and it only took around 30 seconds to open.

    – Matthew
    Jun 12 '12 at 16:58



















  • I use display from the Imagemagick package

    – artistoex
    Jun 11 '12 at 23:10











  • aristotex I didn't see your comment. Probably display and mogrify together are the best solution

    – Bruno9779
    Jun 11 '12 at 23:25











  • Tried display from the imagemagick package and it was unfortunately horrendously slow. Took about 1m30s to open a 500x332 image. When I used the -resize option to downsize the image to 100px wide there was no observable performance increase. I tried gpicview on the same image (500x332 resolution) and it only took around 30 seconds to open.

    – Matthew
    Jun 12 '12 at 16:58

















I use display from the Imagemagick package

– artistoex
Jun 11 '12 at 23:10





I use display from the Imagemagick package

– artistoex
Jun 11 '12 at 23:10













aristotex I didn't see your comment. Probably display and mogrify together are the best solution

– Bruno9779
Jun 11 '12 at 23:25





aristotex I didn't see your comment. Probably display and mogrify together are the best solution

– Bruno9779
Jun 11 '12 at 23:25













Tried display from the imagemagick package and it was unfortunately horrendously slow. Took about 1m30s to open a 500x332 image. When I used the -resize option to downsize the image to 100px wide there was no observable performance increase. I tried gpicview on the same image (500x332 resolution) and it only took around 30 seconds to open.

– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:58





Tried display from the imagemagick package and it was unfortunately horrendously slow. Took about 1m30s to open a 500x332 image. When I used the -resize option to downsize the image to 100px wide there was no observable performance increase. I tried gpicview on the same image (500x332 resolution) and it only took around 30 seconds to open.

– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:58










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I would tackle this differently.
The data overhead for an image viewer is minimal compared to the size of your pics.
Instead I would install imagemagick on the remote machine and resize a copy of the pics with mogrify.



cd yourpicturesfolder
mkdir thumbs
cp * /thumbs
cd /thumbs
mogrify -resize 150 *.jpg


150 is the width in pixels, I think it is a good size for what you need: about 50kb and viewable.



Of course this implies that you have admin access to the remote machine and enough disk space for the copies.






share|improve this answer


























  • I have root access, and this is a great first half to the question, but once I have the small images what application should I use to view them? I don't want to just copy them all over ftp because there could be hundreds of images and I might find what I'm looking for in the first dozen.

    – Matthew
    Jun 12 '12 at 16:55











  • feh

    – Jacob
    Jan 22 '17 at 0:20











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f435497%2ffastest-light-weight-image-viewer-over-forwarded-x11-session-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














I would tackle this differently.
The data overhead for an image viewer is minimal compared to the size of your pics.
Instead I would install imagemagick on the remote machine and resize a copy of the pics with mogrify.



cd yourpicturesfolder
mkdir thumbs
cp * /thumbs
cd /thumbs
mogrify -resize 150 *.jpg


150 is the width in pixels, I think it is a good size for what you need: about 50kb and viewable.



Of course this implies that you have admin access to the remote machine and enough disk space for the copies.






share|improve this answer


























  • I have root access, and this is a great first half to the question, but once I have the small images what application should I use to view them? I don't want to just copy them all over ftp because there could be hundreds of images and I might find what I'm looking for in the first dozen.

    – Matthew
    Jun 12 '12 at 16:55











  • feh

    – Jacob
    Jan 22 '17 at 0:20
















0














I would tackle this differently.
The data overhead for an image viewer is minimal compared to the size of your pics.
Instead I would install imagemagick on the remote machine and resize a copy of the pics with mogrify.



cd yourpicturesfolder
mkdir thumbs
cp * /thumbs
cd /thumbs
mogrify -resize 150 *.jpg


150 is the width in pixels, I think it is a good size for what you need: about 50kb and viewable.



Of course this implies that you have admin access to the remote machine and enough disk space for the copies.






share|improve this answer


























  • I have root access, and this is a great first half to the question, but once I have the small images what application should I use to view them? I don't want to just copy them all over ftp because there could be hundreds of images and I might find what I'm looking for in the first dozen.

    – Matthew
    Jun 12 '12 at 16:55











  • feh

    – Jacob
    Jan 22 '17 at 0:20














0












0








0







I would tackle this differently.
The data overhead for an image viewer is minimal compared to the size of your pics.
Instead I would install imagemagick on the remote machine and resize a copy of the pics with mogrify.



cd yourpicturesfolder
mkdir thumbs
cp * /thumbs
cd /thumbs
mogrify -resize 150 *.jpg


150 is the width in pixels, I think it is a good size for what you need: about 50kb and viewable.



Of course this implies that you have admin access to the remote machine and enough disk space for the copies.






share|improve this answer















I would tackle this differently.
The data overhead for an image viewer is minimal compared to the size of your pics.
Instead I would install imagemagick on the remote machine and resize a copy of the pics with mogrify.



cd yourpicturesfolder
mkdir thumbs
cp * /thumbs
cd /thumbs
mogrify -resize 150 *.jpg


150 is the width in pixels, I think it is a good size for what you need: about 50kb and viewable.



Of course this implies that you have admin access to the remote machine and enough disk space for the copies.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jun 11 '12 at 23:52

























answered Jun 11 '12 at 23:19









Bruno9779Bruno9779

1,152822




1,152822













  • I have root access, and this is a great first half to the question, but once I have the small images what application should I use to view them? I don't want to just copy them all over ftp because there could be hundreds of images and I might find what I'm looking for in the first dozen.

    – Matthew
    Jun 12 '12 at 16:55











  • feh

    – Jacob
    Jan 22 '17 at 0:20



















  • I have root access, and this is a great first half to the question, but once I have the small images what application should I use to view them? I don't want to just copy them all over ftp because there could be hundreds of images and I might find what I'm looking for in the first dozen.

    – Matthew
    Jun 12 '12 at 16:55











  • feh

    – Jacob
    Jan 22 '17 at 0:20

















I have root access, and this is a great first half to the question, but once I have the small images what application should I use to view them? I don't want to just copy them all over ftp because there could be hundreds of images and I might find what I'm looking for in the first dozen.

– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:55





I have root access, and this is a great first half to the question, but once I have the small images what application should I use to view them? I don't want to just copy them all over ftp because there could be hundreds of images and I might find what I'm looking for in the first dozen.

– Matthew
Jun 12 '12 at 16:55













feh

– Jacob
Jan 22 '17 at 0:20





feh

– Jacob
Jan 22 '17 at 0:20


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f435497%2ffastest-light-weight-image-viewer-over-forwarded-x11-session-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Couldn't open a raw socket. Error: Permission denied (13) (nmap)Is it possible to run networking commands...

VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...

Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll? Announcing the arrival of...