Can you determine if focus is sharp without diopter adjustment if your sight is imperfect?What are the...

What are some ways of extending a description of a scenery?

What is a good reason for every spaceship to carry a weapon on board?

Is `Object` a function in javascript?

What species should be used for storage of human minds?

Book where a space ship journeys to the center of the galaxy to find all the stars had gone supernova

Time-efficient matrix elements grouping and summing

Why is that max-Q doesn't occur in transonic regime?

Can a player sacrifice a creature after declaring that creature as blocker while taking lethal damage?

Plausible reason to leave the Solar System?

Charging phone battery with a lower voltage, coming from a bike charger?

Why do neural networks need so many examples to perform?

Not a Long-Winded Riddle

Why is 'diphthong' pronounced the way it is?

How to completely remove a package in Ubuntu (like it never existed)

Reading Mishnayos without understanding

Renting a 2CV in France

Converting very wide logos to square formats

Sitecore 9.1 Installation - Skip to particular step

Single-row INSERT...SELECT much slower than separate SELECT

Are the positive and negative planes inner or outer planes in the Great Wheel cosmology model?

How is this property called for mod?

How do you funnel food off a cutting board?

How big is a framed opening for a door relative to the finished door opening width?

Memory usage: #define vs. static const for uint8_t



Can you determine if focus is sharp without diopter adjustment if your sight is imperfect?


What are the biggest issues with wearing glasses as a photographer and how can they be overcome?What focal length of glasses is best for photography?Can I convert binocular zoom to equivalent lens focal length?How do you manually focus accurately without a focusing screen?How can I get sharp manual focus despite poor eyesight?In which situation should you not use the manual focus?Pentaprism viewfinder and used “pro” gear - really better for manual lenses?Why does this lens lose focus when you zoom in but not when you zoom out?How can I get tack-sharp portraits with the focus perfectly on my subject's eye?What can you do when your lens' focus ring becomes too loose?Best approach for accurate & fast focusing of fully manual lenses without live view. Focus chip, focusing screen or another approach?Can't get sharp focus on Canon 7D at 250mm f/32Sharp focus photography with APS-C













7















I've already encountered this question about wearing glasses as a photographer. A more specific question I have is as follows. If your eyesight is not perfect, or your glasses and/or contact lenses aren't entirely on point anymore, can you actually determine if focus is sharp, or will you be thrown off target? I was wondering if imperfect eyesight will cause the image in a viewfinder to appear sharp when the lens is actually out of focus, or if there will still be some point of "sharpest focus" when adjusting manually that will appear somewhat blurry to the photographer but is in fact sharp. In other words, is it simply some offset or will bad eyesight never see a sharply focused image?



One thing that I suppose would help greatly is a split prism focus screen, which should make focus clear through alignment, whether it appears perfectly sharp to your eyes or not. Are there other ways?



I often shoot in low light (low enough to make auto-focus unreliable), using film SLRs. None of them has a split prism focus screen and only one has a diopter adjustment. Most of the time I'll be wearing contacts, occasionally glasses. I've noticed my eyes seemed to have deteriorated very slightly the past couple of years, but on the other hand my optician didn't recommend getting my vision as sharp as possible because I work with a computer all day and this would apparently be fatiguing for the eyes. So either I get my prescription changed, learn to compensate focus slightly or find some good trick for this.










share|improve this question























  • what is your camera?

    – aaaaaa
    2 hours ago











  • i look at the file size to determine sharpness; bigger file = sharper image (in general). Also, tack-sharp focuses tent to produce a moire pattern in uniform color areas on my camera's LCD due to aliasing, while a blurry image would be dithered instead.

    – dandavis
    24 mins ago


















7















I've already encountered this question about wearing glasses as a photographer. A more specific question I have is as follows. If your eyesight is not perfect, or your glasses and/or contact lenses aren't entirely on point anymore, can you actually determine if focus is sharp, or will you be thrown off target? I was wondering if imperfect eyesight will cause the image in a viewfinder to appear sharp when the lens is actually out of focus, or if there will still be some point of "sharpest focus" when adjusting manually that will appear somewhat blurry to the photographer but is in fact sharp. In other words, is it simply some offset or will bad eyesight never see a sharply focused image?



One thing that I suppose would help greatly is a split prism focus screen, which should make focus clear through alignment, whether it appears perfectly sharp to your eyes or not. Are there other ways?



I often shoot in low light (low enough to make auto-focus unreliable), using film SLRs. None of them has a split prism focus screen and only one has a diopter adjustment. Most of the time I'll be wearing contacts, occasionally glasses. I've noticed my eyes seemed to have deteriorated very slightly the past couple of years, but on the other hand my optician didn't recommend getting my vision as sharp as possible because I work with a computer all day and this would apparently be fatiguing for the eyes. So either I get my prescription changed, learn to compensate focus slightly or find some good trick for this.










share|improve this question























  • what is your camera?

    – aaaaaa
    2 hours ago











  • i look at the file size to determine sharpness; bigger file = sharper image (in general). Also, tack-sharp focuses tent to produce a moire pattern in uniform color areas on my camera's LCD due to aliasing, while a blurry image would be dithered instead.

    – dandavis
    24 mins ago
















7












7








7








I've already encountered this question about wearing glasses as a photographer. A more specific question I have is as follows. If your eyesight is not perfect, or your glasses and/or contact lenses aren't entirely on point anymore, can you actually determine if focus is sharp, or will you be thrown off target? I was wondering if imperfect eyesight will cause the image in a viewfinder to appear sharp when the lens is actually out of focus, or if there will still be some point of "sharpest focus" when adjusting manually that will appear somewhat blurry to the photographer but is in fact sharp. In other words, is it simply some offset or will bad eyesight never see a sharply focused image?



One thing that I suppose would help greatly is a split prism focus screen, which should make focus clear through alignment, whether it appears perfectly sharp to your eyes or not. Are there other ways?



I often shoot in low light (low enough to make auto-focus unreliable), using film SLRs. None of them has a split prism focus screen and only one has a diopter adjustment. Most of the time I'll be wearing contacts, occasionally glasses. I've noticed my eyes seemed to have deteriorated very slightly the past couple of years, but on the other hand my optician didn't recommend getting my vision as sharp as possible because I work with a computer all day and this would apparently be fatiguing for the eyes. So either I get my prescription changed, learn to compensate focus slightly or find some good trick for this.










share|improve this question














I've already encountered this question about wearing glasses as a photographer. A more specific question I have is as follows. If your eyesight is not perfect, or your glasses and/or contact lenses aren't entirely on point anymore, can you actually determine if focus is sharp, or will you be thrown off target? I was wondering if imperfect eyesight will cause the image in a viewfinder to appear sharp when the lens is actually out of focus, or if there will still be some point of "sharpest focus" when adjusting manually that will appear somewhat blurry to the photographer but is in fact sharp. In other words, is it simply some offset or will bad eyesight never see a sharply focused image?



One thing that I suppose would help greatly is a split prism focus screen, which should make focus clear through alignment, whether it appears perfectly sharp to your eyes or not. Are there other ways?



I often shoot in low light (low enough to make auto-focus unreliable), using film SLRs. None of them has a split prism focus screen and only one has a diopter adjustment. Most of the time I'll be wearing contacts, occasionally glasses. I've noticed my eyes seemed to have deteriorated very slightly the past couple of years, but on the other hand my optician didn't recommend getting my vision as sharp as possible because I work with a computer all day and this would apparently be fatiguing for the eyes. So either I get my prescription changed, learn to compensate focus slightly or find some good trick for this.







focus manual-focus sharpness diopter eyeglasses






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 7 hours ago









G_HG_H

2075




2075













  • what is your camera?

    – aaaaaa
    2 hours ago











  • i look at the file size to determine sharpness; bigger file = sharper image (in general). Also, tack-sharp focuses tent to produce a moire pattern in uniform color areas on my camera's LCD due to aliasing, while a blurry image would be dithered instead.

    – dandavis
    24 mins ago





















  • what is your camera?

    – aaaaaa
    2 hours ago











  • i look at the file size to determine sharpness; bigger file = sharper image (in general). Also, tack-sharp focuses tent to produce a moire pattern in uniform color areas on my camera's LCD due to aliasing, while a blurry image would be dithered instead.

    – dandavis
    24 mins ago



















what is your camera?

– aaaaaa
2 hours ago





what is your camera?

– aaaaaa
2 hours ago













i look at the file size to determine sharpness; bigger file = sharper image (in general). Also, tack-sharp focuses tent to produce a moire pattern in uniform color areas on my camera's LCD due to aliasing, while a blurry image would be dithered instead.

– dandavis
24 mins ago







i look at the file size to determine sharpness; bigger file = sharper image (in general). Also, tack-sharp focuses tent to produce a moire pattern in uniform color areas on my camera's LCD due to aliasing, while a blurry image would be dithered instead.

– dandavis
24 mins ago












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















5














The image in the viewfinder is focused on the ground glass screen. The focused image converges on a 2D plane. (It's not like binoculars.) When you look through the viewfinder, your eyes focus on the image on the screen, which is at a fixed (virtual) distance. You can use the diopter adjustment to change your perception of the fixed screen. Glasses or contacts affect this. But the image on the screen is what's coming through the lens.



Just as poor eyesight can't make a blurry print be sharp, you will never "accidentally" see an in-focus image when the image in the viewfinder is actually out of focus.



It might still be hard — without focusing aids it is hard with perfect (or perfectly-corrected) vision. But it will just be harder to see, not misleading. If your vision can't be corrected in a way that works nicely with the viewfinder, it may be time to look at a camera with an EVF (e.g., a mirrorless camera), which can show focus peaking or zoom in to show focus more accurately.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    @xiota None of those will make a thing that is blurred appear sharper than a thing which is not blurry.

    – mattdm
    6 hours ago













  • My own experience directly contradicts what you say. As a teen, I used to think my camera had great focus as items appears sharper than they did 'in reality'. I was always disappointed with the photos. It didn't occur to me until I started to drive, that the problem was my eyes. The camera's focus was being set wrong by me, as it appeared sharpest when it had corrected my vision.

    – Alexandra
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    It is certainly possible for an image to appear sharp in the viewfinder when it is not — there is a limit to the detail you can see that way. And vision problems certainly could make it even harder to tell, but that's not the same thing. Can you image a print — like, a two-dimensional object — that shows more detail to someone with vision problems than to someone with corrected vision? It just doesn't work that way.

    – mattdm
    6 hours ago











  • Just as I asked this I started to think about it and figured you don't really look "through" the lens but at an image on a focus screen. So in that case it is a matter of finding what looks sharpest, knowing that even if it doesn't look tack-sharp to your eyes it's still the most accurate focus? I'm wondering why viewfinders allow such a range of diopter adjustment then. Isn't there rather limited distance from your eye to what you're actually looking at (the focusing screen)?

    – G_H
    5 hours ago











  • @G_H Yes, exactly. And, the lens assembly in the viewfinder makes it so the apparent viewing distance of the viewfinder screen is about a meter away.

    – mattdm
    5 hours ago



















1














It depends on the nature and severity of your imperfect eyes. Not all eye defects are the same. With severe defects, you will never be able to tell whether the camera is in focus.



With mild defects that result in slight blurriness, you can focus by observing the image improve as you turn the focusing ring. At the point that it begins to worsen, reverse the direction you are turning the ring. The image will again improve, then worsen. Back off slightly and take the picture. If in doubt, you can bracket. If you keep missing focus, your aperture may be too wide, stop down a bit to increase depth of field.



As mattdm states, you are focusing on ground glass, not through the lens optical system, so you cannot compensate for a blurry image in the viewfinder that is caused by misfocus. Ground glass in DSLRs is difficult to focus even with good vision. Consider switching to a system with focus peaking, or other focusing aid.



The eye has muscles to focus the lens that are under partial conscious control. Also, squinting both deforms the eye (which can improve focus) and narrows the aperture (which improves depth of field). These compensatory actions are fatiguing. Having sharp vision is not. Consider seeing an optometrist or ophthalmologist (who understands physiology and vision) instead of an optician (who understands optics).






share|improve this answer


























  • No focus peaking, I'm afraid, since I shoot film. For manual focusing I do indeed use the method of tuning the focus by overshooting it, then dialing it a bit back and doing this in a "binary search" kind of way until I find what looks sharpest. Thanks for the advice!

    – G_H
    5 hours ago



















1














It is possible for the image in the viewfinder to appear sharper at a different focus distance than when it appears sharpest in an image captured by the film (or digital sensor) in your camera. But it has nothing to do with your vision. If the focusing screen in the roof of the mirror box is a slightly different optical distance, via the mirror, from the lens than the optical distance from the lens to the film (or sensor) plane is when the mirror is flipped up, it can cause manual focusing errors. A competent camera technician can adjust the mirror's resting position or shim the focusing screen (it depends on the specific camera model and the exact nature of the misalignment - are both top and bottom of the frame off by the same or differing amounts, etc.) to correct the issue.



But assuming the focusing screen is the same optical distance from the lens as the film (or sensor) plane is, you'll always see the image in the viewfinder as "least blurry" at the same focus position as when the lens is focused as "least blurry" for the film (or sensor) plane.






share|improve this answer































    0














    You adjust the diopter setting based on your ability to make out numbers, reticle (horizontal and vertical alignment lines) etc. In other words, you adjust as best you can for the displayed data.






    share|improve this answer
























    • I've noticed that on a Canon EOS 33 (Elan 7) I've just acquired the diopter adjustment works great to make an auto-focused image appear tack sharp. Unfortunately my other EOS cameras don't feature such adjustment so I'm left to find other means.

      – G_H
      6 hours ago











    • @ C_H -- The diopter a unit of lens power favored by opticians. 1d or 1 diopter = focal length 1000mm. 2d = 500mm whereas 4d = 250. This is the stuff of the bifocal add and/or reading eyeglasses. You can experiment at the reading glass counter of your favorite drugstore. You can dawn reading glasses for you photo activity or have your optometrist mount an add to your spectacles, its location will be about optical center. You can find temporary paste-on adds that can be used over and over, made of soft plastic, you can add to your spectacles. Perhaps they can be made to fit your viewfinder.

      – Alan Marcus
      4 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "61"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105392%2fcan-you-determine-if-focus-is-sharp-without-diopter-adjustment-if-your-sight-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    The image in the viewfinder is focused on the ground glass screen. The focused image converges on a 2D plane. (It's not like binoculars.) When you look through the viewfinder, your eyes focus on the image on the screen, which is at a fixed (virtual) distance. You can use the diopter adjustment to change your perception of the fixed screen. Glasses or contacts affect this. But the image on the screen is what's coming through the lens.



    Just as poor eyesight can't make a blurry print be sharp, you will never "accidentally" see an in-focus image when the image in the viewfinder is actually out of focus.



    It might still be hard — without focusing aids it is hard with perfect (or perfectly-corrected) vision. But it will just be harder to see, not misleading. If your vision can't be corrected in a way that works nicely with the viewfinder, it may be time to look at a camera with an EVF (e.g., a mirrorless camera), which can show focus peaking or zoom in to show focus more accurately.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      @xiota None of those will make a thing that is blurred appear sharper than a thing which is not blurry.

      – mattdm
      6 hours ago













    • My own experience directly contradicts what you say. As a teen, I used to think my camera had great focus as items appears sharper than they did 'in reality'. I was always disappointed with the photos. It didn't occur to me until I started to drive, that the problem was my eyes. The camera's focus was being set wrong by me, as it appeared sharpest when it had corrected my vision.

      – Alexandra
      6 hours ago






    • 1





      It is certainly possible for an image to appear sharp in the viewfinder when it is not — there is a limit to the detail you can see that way. And vision problems certainly could make it even harder to tell, but that's not the same thing. Can you image a print — like, a two-dimensional object — that shows more detail to someone with vision problems than to someone with corrected vision? It just doesn't work that way.

      – mattdm
      6 hours ago











    • Just as I asked this I started to think about it and figured you don't really look "through" the lens but at an image on a focus screen. So in that case it is a matter of finding what looks sharpest, knowing that even if it doesn't look tack-sharp to your eyes it's still the most accurate focus? I'm wondering why viewfinders allow such a range of diopter adjustment then. Isn't there rather limited distance from your eye to what you're actually looking at (the focusing screen)?

      – G_H
      5 hours ago











    • @G_H Yes, exactly. And, the lens assembly in the viewfinder makes it so the apparent viewing distance of the viewfinder screen is about a meter away.

      – mattdm
      5 hours ago
















    5














    The image in the viewfinder is focused on the ground glass screen. The focused image converges on a 2D plane. (It's not like binoculars.) When you look through the viewfinder, your eyes focus on the image on the screen, which is at a fixed (virtual) distance. You can use the diopter adjustment to change your perception of the fixed screen. Glasses or contacts affect this. But the image on the screen is what's coming through the lens.



    Just as poor eyesight can't make a blurry print be sharp, you will never "accidentally" see an in-focus image when the image in the viewfinder is actually out of focus.



    It might still be hard — without focusing aids it is hard with perfect (or perfectly-corrected) vision. But it will just be harder to see, not misleading. If your vision can't be corrected in a way that works nicely with the viewfinder, it may be time to look at a camera with an EVF (e.g., a mirrorless camera), which can show focus peaking or zoom in to show focus more accurately.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      @xiota None of those will make a thing that is blurred appear sharper than a thing which is not blurry.

      – mattdm
      6 hours ago













    • My own experience directly contradicts what you say. As a teen, I used to think my camera had great focus as items appears sharper than they did 'in reality'. I was always disappointed with the photos. It didn't occur to me until I started to drive, that the problem was my eyes. The camera's focus was being set wrong by me, as it appeared sharpest when it had corrected my vision.

      – Alexandra
      6 hours ago






    • 1





      It is certainly possible for an image to appear sharp in the viewfinder when it is not — there is a limit to the detail you can see that way. And vision problems certainly could make it even harder to tell, but that's not the same thing. Can you image a print — like, a two-dimensional object — that shows more detail to someone with vision problems than to someone with corrected vision? It just doesn't work that way.

      – mattdm
      6 hours ago











    • Just as I asked this I started to think about it and figured you don't really look "through" the lens but at an image on a focus screen. So in that case it is a matter of finding what looks sharpest, knowing that even if it doesn't look tack-sharp to your eyes it's still the most accurate focus? I'm wondering why viewfinders allow such a range of diopter adjustment then. Isn't there rather limited distance from your eye to what you're actually looking at (the focusing screen)?

      – G_H
      5 hours ago











    • @G_H Yes, exactly. And, the lens assembly in the viewfinder makes it so the apparent viewing distance of the viewfinder screen is about a meter away.

      – mattdm
      5 hours ago














    5












    5








    5







    The image in the viewfinder is focused on the ground glass screen. The focused image converges on a 2D plane. (It's not like binoculars.) When you look through the viewfinder, your eyes focus on the image on the screen, which is at a fixed (virtual) distance. You can use the diopter adjustment to change your perception of the fixed screen. Glasses or contacts affect this. But the image on the screen is what's coming through the lens.



    Just as poor eyesight can't make a blurry print be sharp, you will never "accidentally" see an in-focus image when the image in the viewfinder is actually out of focus.



    It might still be hard — without focusing aids it is hard with perfect (or perfectly-corrected) vision. But it will just be harder to see, not misleading. If your vision can't be corrected in a way that works nicely with the viewfinder, it may be time to look at a camera with an EVF (e.g., a mirrorless camera), which can show focus peaking or zoom in to show focus more accurately.






    share|improve this answer















    The image in the viewfinder is focused on the ground glass screen. The focused image converges on a 2D plane. (It's not like binoculars.) When you look through the viewfinder, your eyes focus on the image on the screen, which is at a fixed (virtual) distance. You can use the diopter adjustment to change your perception of the fixed screen. Glasses or contacts affect this. But the image on the screen is what's coming through the lens.



    Just as poor eyesight can't make a blurry print be sharp, you will never "accidentally" see an in-focus image when the image in the viewfinder is actually out of focus.



    It might still be hard — without focusing aids it is hard with perfect (or perfectly-corrected) vision. But it will just be harder to see, not misleading. If your vision can't be corrected in a way that works nicely with the viewfinder, it may be time to look at a camera with an EVF (e.g., a mirrorless camera), which can show focus peaking or zoom in to show focus more accurately.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 5 hours ago

























    answered 6 hours ago









    mattdmmattdm

    121k39356646




    121k39356646








    • 1





      @xiota None of those will make a thing that is blurred appear sharper than a thing which is not blurry.

      – mattdm
      6 hours ago













    • My own experience directly contradicts what you say. As a teen, I used to think my camera had great focus as items appears sharper than they did 'in reality'. I was always disappointed with the photos. It didn't occur to me until I started to drive, that the problem was my eyes. The camera's focus was being set wrong by me, as it appeared sharpest when it had corrected my vision.

      – Alexandra
      6 hours ago






    • 1





      It is certainly possible for an image to appear sharp in the viewfinder when it is not — there is a limit to the detail you can see that way. And vision problems certainly could make it even harder to tell, but that's not the same thing. Can you image a print — like, a two-dimensional object — that shows more detail to someone with vision problems than to someone with corrected vision? It just doesn't work that way.

      – mattdm
      6 hours ago











    • Just as I asked this I started to think about it and figured you don't really look "through" the lens but at an image on a focus screen. So in that case it is a matter of finding what looks sharpest, knowing that even if it doesn't look tack-sharp to your eyes it's still the most accurate focus? I'm wondering why viewfinders allow such a range of diopter adjustment then. Isn't there rather limited distance from your eye to what you're actually looking at (the focusing screen)?

      – G_H
      5 hours ago











    • @G_H Yes, exactly. And, the lens assembly in the viewfinder makes it so the apparent viewing distance of the viewfinder screen is about a meter away.

      – mattdm
      5 hours ago














    • 1





      @xiota None of those will make a thing that is blurred appear sharper than a thing which is not blurry.

      – mattdm
      6 hours ago













    • My own experience directly contradicts what you say. As a teen, I used to think my camera had great focus as items appears sharper than they did 'in reality'. I was always disappointed with the photos. It didn't occur to me until I started to drive, that the problem was my eyes. The camera's focus was being set wrong by me, as it appeared sharpest when it had corrected my vision.

      – Alexandra
      6 hours ago






    • 1





      It is certainly possible for an image to appear sharp in the viewfinder when it is not — there is a limit to the detail you can see that way. And vision problems certainly could make it even harder to tell, but that's not the same thing. Can you image a print — like, a two-dimensional object — that shows more detail to someone with vision problems than to someone with corrected vision? It just doesn't work that way.

      – mattdm
      6 hours ago











    • Just as I asked this I started to think about it and figured you don't really look "through" the lens but at an image on a focus screen. So in that case it is a matter of finding what looks sharpest, knowing that even if it doesn't look tack-sharp to your eyes it's still the most accurate focus? I'm wondering why viewfinders allow such a range of diopter adjustment then. Isn't there rather limited distance from your eye to what you're actually looking at (the focusing screen)?

      – G_H
      5 hours ago











    • @G_H Yes, exactly. And, the lens assembly in the viewfinder makes it so the apparent viewing distance of the viewfinder screen is about a meter away.

      – mattdm
      5 hours ago








    1




    1





    @xiota None of those will make a thing that is blurred appear sharper than a thing which is not blurry.

    – mattdm
    6 hours ago







    @xiota None of those will make a thing that is blurred appear sharper than a thing which is not blurry.

    – mattdm
    6 hours ago















    My own experience directly contradicts what you say. As a teen, I used to think my camera had great focus as items appears sharper than they did 'in reality'. I was always disappointed with the photos. It didn't occur to me until I started to drive, that the problem was my eyes. The camera's focus was being set wrong by me, as it appeared sharpest when it had corrected my vision.

    – Alexandra
    6 hours ago





    My own experience directly contradicts what you say. As a teen, I used to think my camera had great focus as items appears sharper than they did 'in reality'. I was always disappointed with the photos. It didn't occur to me until I started to drive, that the problem was my eyes. The camera's focus was being set wrong by me, as it appeared sharpest when it had corrected my vision.

    – Alexandra
    6 hours ago




    1




    1





    It is certainly possible for an image to appear sharp in the viewfinder when it is not — there is a limit to the detail you can see that way. And vision problems certainly could make it even harder to tell, but that's not the same thing. Can you image a print — like, a two-dimensional object — that shows more detail to someone with vision problems than to someone with corrected vision? It just doesn't work that way.

    – mattdm
    6 hours ago





    It is certainly possible for an image to appear sharp in the viewfinder when it is not — there is a limit to the detail you can see that way. And vision problems certainly could make it even harder to tell, but that's not the same thing. Can you image a print — like, a two-dimensional object — that shows more detail to someone with vision problems than to someone with corrected vision? It just doesn't work that way.

    – mattdm
    6 hours ago













    Just as I asked this I started to think about it and figured you don't really look "through" the lens but at an image on a focus screen. So in that case it is a matter of finding what looks sharpest, knowing that even if it doesn't look tack-sharp to your eyes it's still the most accurate focus? I'm wondering why viewfinders allow such a range of diopter adjustment then. Isn't there rather limited distance from your eye to what you're actually looking at (the focusing screen)?

    – G_H
    5 hours ago





    Just as I asked this I started to think about it and figured you don't really look "through" the lens but at an image on a focus screen. So in that case it is a matter of finding what looks sharpest, knowing that even if it doesn't look tack-sharp to your eyes it's still the most accurate focus? I'm wondering why viewfinders allow such a range of diopter adjustment then. Isn't there rather limited distance from your eye to what you're actually looking at (the focusing screen)?

    – G_H
    5 hours ago













    @G_H Yes, exactly. And, the lens assembly in the viewfinder makes it so the apparent viewing distance of the viewfinder screen is about a meter away.

    – mattdm
    5 hours ago





    @G_H Yes, exactly. And, the lens assembly in the viewfinder makes it so the apparent viewing distance of the viewfinder screen is about a meter away.

    – mattdm
    5 hours ago













    1














    It depends on the nature and severity of your imperfect eyes. Not all eye defects are the same. With severe defects, you will never be able to tell whether the camera is in focus.



    With mild defects that result in slight blurriness, you can focus by observing the image improve as you turn the focusing ring. At the point that it begins to worsen, reverse the direction you are turning the ring. The image will again improve, then worsen. Back off slightly and take the picture. If in doubt, you can bracket. If you keep missing focus, your aperture may be too wide, stop down a bit to increase depth of field.



    As mattdm states, you are focusing on ground glass, not through the lens optical system, so you cannot compensate for a blurry image in the viewfinder that is caused by misfocus. Ground glass in DSLRs is difficult to focus even with good vision. Consider switching to a system with focus peaking, or other focusing aid.



    The eye has muscles to focus the lens that are under partial conscious control. Also, squinting both deforms the eye (which can improve focus) and narrows the aperture (which improves depth of field). These compensatory actions are fatiguing. Having sharp vision is not. Consider seeing an optometrist or ophthalmologist (who understands physiology and vision) instead of an optician (who understands optics).






    share|improve this answer


























    • No focus peaking, I'm afraid, since I shoot film. For manual focusing I do indeed use the method of tuning the focus by overshooting it, then dialing it a bit back and doing this in a "binary search" kind of way until I find what looks sharpest. Thanks for the advice!

      – G_H
      5 hours ago
















    1














    It depends on the nature and severity of your imperfect eyes. Not all eye defects are the same. With severe defects, you will never be able to tell whether the camera is in focus.



    With mild defects that result in slight blurriness, you can focus by observing the image improve as you turn the focusing ring. At the point that it begins to worsen, reverse the direction you are turning the ring. The image will again improve, then worsen. Back off slightly and take the picture. If in doubt, you can bracket. If you keep missing focus, your aperture may be too wide, stop down a bit to increase depth of field.



    As mattdm states, you are focusing on ground glass, not through the lens optical system, so you cannot compensate for a blurry image in the viewfinder that is caused by misfocus. Ground glass in DSLRs is difficult to focus even with good vision. Consider switching to a system with focus peaking, or other focusing aid.



    The eye has muscles to focus the lens that are under partial conscious control. Also, squinting both deforms the eye (which can improve focus) and narrows the aperture (which improves depth of field). These compensatory actions are fatiguing. Having sharp vision is not. Consider seeing an optometrist or ophthalmologist (who understands physiology and vision) instead of an optician (who understands optics).






    share|improve this answer


























    • No focus peaking, I'm afraid, since I shoot film. For manual focusing I do indeed use the method of tuning the focus by overshooting it, then dialing it a bit back and doing this in a "binary search" kind of way until I find what looks sharpest. Thanks for the advice!

      – G_H
      5 hours ago














    1












    1








    1







    It depends on the nature and severity of your imperfect eyes. Not all eye defects are the same. With severe defects, you will never be able to tell whether the camera is in focus.



    With mild defects that result in slight blurriness, you can focus by observing the image improve as you turn the focusing ring. At the point that it begins to worsen, reverse the direction you are turning the ring. The image will again improve, then worsen. Back off slightly and take the picture. If in doubt, you can bracket. If you keep missing focus, your aperture may be too wide, stop down a bit to increase depth of field.



    As mattdm states, you are focusing on ground glass, not through the lens optical system, so you cannot compensate for a blurry image in the viewfinder that is caused by misfocus. Ground glass in DSLRs is difficult to focus even with good vision. Consider switching to a system with focus peaking, or other focusing aid.



    The eye has muscles to focus the lens that are under partial conscious control. Also, squinting both deforms the eye (which can improve focus) and narrows the aperture (which improves depth of field). These compensatory actions are fatiguing. Having sharp vision is not. Consider seeing an optometrist or ophthalmologist (who understands physiology and vision) instead of an optician (who understands optics).






    share|improve this answer















    It depends on the nature and severity of your imperfect eyes. Not all eye defects are the same. With severe defects, you will never be able to tell whether the camera is in focus.



    With mild defects that result in slight blurriness, you can focus by observing the image improve as you turn the focusing ring. At the point that it begins to worsen, reverse the direction you are turning the ring. The image will again improve, then worsen. Back off slightly and take the picture. If in doubt, you can bracket. If you keep missing focus, your aperture may be too wide, stop down a bit to increase depth of field.



    As mattdm states, you are focusing on ground glass, not through the lens optical system, so you cannot compensate for a blurry image in the viewfinder that is caused by misfocus. Ground glass in DSLRs is difficult to focus even with good vision. Consider switching to a system with focus peaking, or other focusing aid.



    The eye has muscles to focus the lens that are under partial conscious control. Also, squinting both deforms the eye (which can improve focus) and narrows the aperture (which improves depth of field). These compensatory actions are fatiguing. Having sharp vision is not. Consider seeing an optometrist or ophthalmologist (who understands physiology and vision) instead of an optician (who understands optics).







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 6 hours ago

























    answered 6 hours ago









    xiotaxiota

    10.8k31859




    10.8k31859













    • No focus peaking, I'm afraid, since I shoot film. For manual focusing I do indeed use the method of tuning the focus by overshooting it, then dialing it a bit back and doing this in a "binary search" kind of way until I find what looks sharpest. Thanks for the advice!

      – G_H
      5 hours ago



















    • No focus peaking, I'm afraid, since I shoot film. For manual focusing I do indeed use the method of tuning the focus by overshooting it, then dialing it a bit back and doing this in a "binary search" kind of way until I find what looks sharpest. Thanks for the advice!

      – G_H
      5 hours ago

















    No focus peaking, I'm afraid, since I shoot film. For manual focusing I do indeed use the method of tuning the focus by overshooting it, then dialing it a bit back and doing this in a "binary search" kind of way until I find what looks sharpest. Thanks for the advice!

    – G_H
    5 hours ago





    No focus peaking, I'm afraid, since I shoot film. For manual focusing I do indeed use the method of tuning the focus by overshooting it, then dialing it a bit back and doing this in a "binary search" kind of way until I find what looks sharpest. Thanks for the advice!

    – G_H
    5 hours ago











    1














    It is possible for the image in the viewfinder to appear sharper at a different focus distance than when it appears sharpest in an image captured by the film (or digital sensor) in your camera. But it has nothing to do with your vision. If the focusing screen in the roof of the mirror box is a slightly different optical distance, via the mirror, from the lens than the optical distance from the lens to the film (or sensor) plane is when the mirror is flipped up, it can cause manual focusing errors. A competent camera technician can adjust the mirror's resting position or shim the focusing screen (it depends on the specific camera model and the exact nature of the misalignment - are both top and bottom of the frame off by the same or differing amounts, etc.) to correct the issue.



    But assuming the focusing screen is the same optical distance from the lens as the film (or sensor) plane is, you'll always see the image in the viewfinder as "least blurry" at the same focus position as when the lens is focused as "least blurry" for the film (or sensor) plane.






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      It is possible for the image in the viewfinder to appear sharper at a different focus distance than when it appears sharpest in an image captured by the film (or digital sensor) in your camera. But it has nothing to do with your vision. If the focusing screen in the roof of the mirror box is a slightly different optical distance, via the mirror, from the lens than the optical distance from the lens to the film (or sensor) plane is when the mirror is flipped up, it can cause manual focusing errors. A competent camera technician can adjust the mirror's resting position or shim the focusing screen (it depends on the specific camera model and the exact nature of the misalignment - are both top and bottom of the frame off by the same or differing amounts, etc.) to correct the issue.



      But assuming the focusing screen is the same optical distance from the lens as the film (or sensor) plane is, you'll always see the image in the viewfinder as "least blurry" at the same focus position as when the lens is focused as "least blurry" for the film (or sensor) plane.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        It is possible for the image in the viewfinder to appear sharper at a different focus distance than when it appears sharpest in an image captured by the film (or digital sensor) in your camera. But it has nothing to do with your vision. If the focusing screen in the roof of the mirror box is a slightly different optical distance, via the mirror, from the lens than the optical distance from the lens to the film (or sensor) plane is when the mirror is flipped up, it can cause manual focusing errors. A competent camera technician can adjust the mirror's resting position or shim the focusing screen (it depends on the specific camera model and the exact nature of the misalignment - are both top and bottom of the frame off by the same or differing amounts, etc.) to correct the issue.



        But assuming the focusing screen is the same optical distance from the lens as the film (or sensor) plane is, you'll always see the image in the viewfinder as "least blurry" at the same focus position as when the lens is focused as "least blurry" for the film (or sensor) plane.






        share|improve this answer













        It is possible for the image in the viewfinder to appear sharper at a different focus distance than when it appears sharpest in an image captured by the film (or digital sensor) in your camera. But it has nothing to do with your vision. If the focusing screen in the roof of the mirror box is a slightly different optical distance, via the mirror, from the lens than the optical distance from the lens to the film (or sensor) plane is when the mirror is flipped up, it can cause manual focusing errors. A competent camera technician can adjust the mirror's resting position or shim the focusing screen (it depends on the specific camera model and the exact nature of the misalignment - are both top and bottom of the frame off by the same or differing amounts, etc.) to correct the issue.



        But assuming the focusing screen is the same optical distance from the lens as the film (or sensor) plane is, you'll always see the image in the viewfinder as "least blurry" at the same focus position as when the lens is focused as "least blurry" for the film (or sensor) plane.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        Michael CMichael C

        132k7151372




        132k7151372























            0














            You adjust the diopter setting based on your ability to make out numbers, reticle (horizontal and vertical alignment lines) etc. In other words, you adjust as best you can for the displayed data.






            share|improve this answer
























            • I've noticed that on a Canon EOS 33 (Elan 7) I've just acquired the diopter adjustment works great to make an auto-focused image appear tack sharp. Unfortunately my other EOS cameras don't feature such adjustment so I'm left to find other means.

              – G_H
              6 hours ago











            • @ C_H -- The diopter a unit of lens power favored by opticians. 1d or 1 diopter = focal length 1000mm. 2d = 500mm whereas 4d = 250. This is the stuff of the bifocal add and/or reading eyeglasses. You can experiment at the reading glass counter of your favorite drugstore. You can dawn reading glasses for you photo activity or have your optometrist mount an add to your spectacles, its location will be about optical center. You can find temporary paste-on adds that can be used over and over, made of soft plastic, you can add to your spectacles. Perhaps they can be made to fit your viewfinder.

              – Alan Marcus
              4 hours ago
















            0














            You adjust the diopter setting based on your ability to make out numbers, reticle (horizontal and vertical alignment lines) etc. In other words, you adjust as best you can for the displayed data.






            share|improve this answer
























            • I've noticed that on a Canon EOS 33 (Elan 7) I've just acquired the diopter adjustment works great to make an auto-focused image appear tack sharp. Unfortunately my other EOS cameras don't feature such adjustment so I'm left to find other means.

              – G_H
              6 hours ago











            • @ C_H -- The diopter a unit of lens power favored by opticians. 1d or 1 diopter = focal length 1000mm. 2d = 500mm whereas 4d = 250. This is the stuff of the bifocal add and/or reading eyeglasses. You can experiment at the reading glass counter of your favorite drugstore. You can dawn reading glasses for you photo activity or have your optometrist mount an add to your spectacles, its location will be about optical center. You can find temporary paste-on adds that can be used over and over, made of soft plastic, you can add to your spectacles. Perhaps they can be made to fit your viewfinder.

              – Alan Marcus
              4 hours ago














            0












            0








            0







            You adjust the diopter setting based on your ability to make out numbers, reticle (horizontal and vertical alignment lines) etc. In other words, you adjust as best you can for the displayed data.






            share|improve this answer













            You adjust the diopter setting based on your ability to make out numbers, reticle (horizontal and vertical alignment lines) etc. In other words, you adjust as best you can for the displayed data.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 6 hours ago









            Alan MarcusAlan Marcus

            25.5k23060




            25.5k23060













            • I've noticed that on a Canon EOS 33 (Elan 7) I've just acquired the diopter adjustment works great to make an auto-focused image appear tack sharp. Unfortunately my other EOS cameras don't feature such adjustment so I'm left to find other means.

              – G_H
              6 hours ago











            • @ C_H -- The diopter a unit of lens power favored by opticians. 1d or 1 diopter = focal length 1000mm. 2d = 500mm whereas 4d = 250. This is the stuff of the bifocal add and/or reading eyeglasses. You can experiment at the reading glass counter of your favorite drugstore. You can dawn reading glasses for you photo activity or have your optometrist mount an add to your spectacles, its location will be about optical center. You can find temporary paste-on adds that can be used over and over, made of soft plastic, you can add to your spectacles. Perhaps they can be made to fit your viewfinder.

              – Alan Marcus
              4 hours ago



















            • I've noticed that on a Canon EOS 33 (Elan 7) I've just acquired the diopter adjustment works great to make an auto-focused image appear tack sharp. Unfortunately my other EOS cameras don't feature such adjustment so I'm left to find other means.

              – G_H
              6 hours ago











            • @ C_H -- The diopter a unit of lens power favored by opticians. 1d or 1 diopter = focal length 1000mm. 2d = 500mm whereas 4d = 250. This is the stuff of the bifocal add and/or reading eyeglasses. You can experiment at the reading glass counter of your favorite drugstore. You can dawn reading glasses for you photo activity or have your optometrist mount an add to your spectacles, its location will be about optical center. You can find temporary paste-on adds that can be used over and over, made of soft plastic, you can add to your spectacles. Perhaps they can be made to fit your viewfinder.

              – Alan Marcus
              4 hours ago

















            I've noticed that on a Canon EOS 33 (Elan 7) I've just acquired the diopter adjustment works great to make an auto-focused image appear tack sharp. Unfortunately my other EOS cameras don't feature such adjustment so I'm left to find other means.

            – G_H
            6 hours ago





            I've noticed that on a Canon EOS 33 (Elan 7) I've just acquired the diopter adjustment works great to make an auto-focused image appear tack sharp. Unfortunately my other EOS cameras don't feature such adjustment so I'm left to find other means.

            – G_H
            6 hours ago













            @ C_H -- The diopter a unit of lens power favored by opticians. 1d or 1 diopter = focal length 1000mm. 2d = 500mm whereas 4d = 250. This is the stuff of the bifocal add and/or reading eyeglasses. You can experiment at the reading glass counter of your favorite drugstore. You can dawn reading glasses for you photo activity or have your optometrist mount an add to your spectacles, its location will be about optical center. You can find temporary paste-on adds that can be used over and over, made of soft plastic, you can add to your spectacles. Perhaps they can be made to fit your viewfinder.

            – Alan Marcus
            4 hours ago





            @ C_H -- The diopter a unit of lens power favored by opticians. 1d or 1 diopter = focal length 1000mm. 2d = 500mm whereas 4d = 250. This is the stuff of the bifocal add and/or reading eyeglasses. You can experiment at the reading glass counter of your favorite drugstore. You can dawn reading glasses for you photo activity or have your optometrist mount an add to your spectacles, its location will be about optical center. You can find temporary paste-on adds that can be used over and over, made of soft plastic, you can add to your spectacles. Perhaps they can be made to fit your viewfinder.

            – Alan Marcus
            4 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105392%2fcan-you-determine-if-focus-is-sharp-without-diopter-adjustment-if-your-sight-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll? Announcing the arrival of...

            Couldn't open a raw socket. Error: Permission denied (13) (nmap)Is it possible to run networking commands...

            VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...