Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?With...

Is the month field really deprecated?

Do Phineas and Ferb ever actually get busted in real time?

Explain the parameters before and after @ in the terminal prompt

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

If two metric spaces are topologically equivalent (homeomorphic) imply that they are complete?

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

A Journey Through Space and Time

How do I create uniquely male characters?

XeLaTeX and pdfLaTeX ignore hyphenation

Addon: add submenu

The magic money tree problem

A function which translates a sentence to title-case

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

Today is the Center

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

"which" command doesn't work / path of Safari?

How to report a triplet of septets in NMR tabulation?

Can a German sentence have two subjects?

How can I hide my bitcoin transactions to protect anonymity from others?



Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?


With Newton's third law, why are things capable of moving?Clarification regarding Newton's Third Law of Motion and why movement is possibleAccording to Newton's third law, why don't Action and Reaction make equilibrium?Person Pushing a Block vs. People Pushing off Each Other - Newton's Third LawNewton's third law of motion when moving between two surfacesConfused about Newton's 3rd lawHow did tension developed in a string when two equal and opposite forces are applied on the same body?Why does a Ball bounce back if Forces are Equal and Opposite?Why doesn't an object that collides with one that is at rest just do a 180?Newton's $3^{rd}$ Law of motionWhy does Newton's Third Law work for fields?













13












$begingroup$


Why doesn't a person bounce back after falling down like a ball? If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction. If we take the example of ball then it comes back with the same force as it falls down. But in the case of a human body, this law is not applicable. Why?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/45653/2451 and links therein.
    $endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    2 days ago






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    A ball does not come back with exactly the same force: youtube.com/watch?v=xXXF2C-vrQE
    $endgroup$
    – StrongBad
    yesterday








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Physics does predict such a lossless bounce -- but only for completely elastic spherical persons in a vacuum.
    $endgroup$
    – A. I. Breveleri
    3 hours ago
















13












$begingroup$


Why doesn't a person bounce back after falling down like a ball? If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction. If we take the example of ball then it comes back with the same force as it falls down. But in the case of a human body, this law is not applicable. Why?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/45653/2451 and links therein.
    $endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    2 days ago






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    A ball does not come back with exactly the same force: youtube.com/watch?v=xXXF2C-vrQE
    $endgroup$
    – StrongBad
    yesterday








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Physics does predict such a lossless bounce -- but only for completely elastic spherical persons in a vacuum.
    $endgroup$
    – A. I. Breveleri
    3 hours ago














13












13








13


2



$begingroup$


Why doesn't a person bounce back after falling down like a ball? If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction. If we take the example of ball then it comes back with the same force as it falls down. But in the case of a human body, this law is not applicable. Why?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Why doesn't a person bounce back after falling down like a ball? If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction. If we take the example of ball then it comes back with the same force as it falls down. But in the case of a human body, this law is not applicable. Why?







newtonian-mechanics forces conservation-laws collision free-body-diagram






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









Jens

2,41611431




2,41611431






New contributor




nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









nameera jabeennameera jabeen

8613




8613




New contributor




nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/45653/2451 and links therein.
    $endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    2 days ago






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    A ball does not come back with exactly the same force: youtube.com/watch?v=xXXF2C-vrQE
    $endgroup$
    – StrongBad
    yesterday








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Physics does predict such a lossless bounce -- but only for completely elastic spherical persons in a vacuum.
    $endgroup$
    – A. I. Breveleri
    3 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/45653/2451 and links therein.
    $endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    2 days ago






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    A ball does not come back with exactly the same force: youtube.com/watch?v=xXXF2C-vrQE
    $endgroup$
    – StrongBad
    yesterday








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Physics does predict such a lossless bounce -- but only for completely elastic spherical persons in a vacuum.
    $endgroup$
    – A. I. Breveleri
    3 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/45653/2451 and links therein.
$endgroup$
– Qmechanic
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/45653/2451 and links therein.
$endgroup$
– Qmechanic
2 days ago




6




6




$begingroup$
A ball does not come back with exactly the same force: youtube.com/watch?v=xXXF2C-vrQE
$endgroup$
– StrongBad
yesterday






$begingroup$
A ball does not come back with exactly the same force: youtube.com/watch?v=xXXF2C-vrQE
$endgroup$
– StrongBad
yesterday






1




1




$begingroup$
Physics does predict such a lossless bounce -- but only for completely elastic spherical persons in a vacuum.
$endgroup$
– A. I. Breveleri
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Physics does predict such a lossless bounce -- but only for completely elastic spherical persons in a vacuum.
$endgroup$
– A. I. Breveleri
3 hours ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















77












$begingroup$

Newton's third law just says when the person is hitting the floor the force the person exerts on the ground is equal to the force the ground exerts on the person. i.e. all forces are interactions.



Newton's third law does not say that all collisions are elastic, which is what you are proposing. When someone hits the floor most of the energy is absorbed by the person through deformation (as well as the floor, depending on what type of floor it is), but there is barely any rebound since people tend to not be very elastic. i.e. the deformation does not involve storing the energy to be released back into kinetic energy. Contrast this with a bouncy ball where much of the energy goes into deforming the ball, but since it is very elastic it is able to spring back and put energy back into motion. However, it is unlikely the collision is still perfectly elastic, as you seem to suggest in your question.



Your misunderstanding likely comes from the imprecise usage of the words "action" and "reaction". In this case, these words refer to just forces, not entire processes. You can get some confusing questions if you don't understand this. For example, why is it that when I open my refrigerator that my refrigerator doesn't also open me?






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 4




    $begingroup$
    +1: I have been laughing like an idiot to the last sentence for 10 minutes already.
    $endgroup$
    – gented
    5 hours ago



















9












$begingroup$

When your body hits the floor, it does receive an equal and opposite reaction force from the floor. But unlike a ball a body is a complex object. So not all energy is transferred back as kinetic energy. Some energy is used to produce sound, some is used to deform your body... etc. I think you are confusing force with energy. Does every ball bounce back the same amount? Newton's 3rd law talks about force only. More force doesn't always (mostly) equal to more work done.



In your case, if all the force was used to change the body's kinetic energy somehow (which is not realistically possible), then it would have bounced back the same amount.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$


    If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction.




    That's not a correct statement of Newton's third law.



    Newton's third law of motion actually says: "If one object exerts a force on another object, then the second object also exerts a force on the first object, which is of the same magnitude but in the opposite direction."



    So in this case, what Newton's third law is saying is: "If the floor pushes up on a person with a certain amount of force, then the person pushes down on the floor with the same amount of force." From this, there's no reason to think that the person would bounce back to his initial position.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Newton defined "action" to mean "change of momentum", so that the original statement is precise, but that context is not commonly given with the quote.
      $endgroup$
      – aschepler
      yesterday






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I was being a little loose with my words. Newton wrote it correctly, but as far as I know, the word "action" isn't used that way in modern English. So I feel safe calling that phrasing incorrect.
      $endgroup$
      – Tanner Swett
      16 hours ago



















    1












    $begingroup$

    It's true that on the impact the human body experiences a force upwards equal to the force the body exerts downwards on the Earth: $vec{F}=frac{Deltavec{p}}{Delta t}$. Now $Deltavec{p}$ doesn't send the body's momentum in the opposite direction, but instead, all the momentum change is used to crack the bones, or more general deform the body in a horrible way (unless the person jumps from a small height, in which case he or she can give his(her)self an upward force by stretching his legs in which case he can reach the same height as where he came from, or even higher; in this case though, the energy necessary to return to the same hight comes from the body, which makes it an explosive collision and here we are talking about an inelastic collision). Some parts may bounce back upwards but are pulled back again by the rest of the body. So all kinetic energy has conversed in other forms of energy (including kinetic energy $frac{1}{2}mvec v^2$ in which most $vec{v}$'s don't have a direction upwards).






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Momentum isn't used to crack bones. That's kinetic energy.
      $endgroup$
      – wizzwizz4
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      Well, I think that's an equivalent way to say it. A change in momentum can crack bones. But I made an edit.
      $endgroup$
      – descheleschilder
      yesterday












    • $begingroup$
      You wrote "all the momentum is used to crack the bones". You can't use up momentum like that.
      $endgroup$
      – wizzwizz4
      yesterday



















    1












    $begingroup$

    Newton's third law states that when a particle applies a force on another particle then the former experiences an equal but opposite force from the other.When a ball hits the ground it comes back due to the fact that it experiences an elastic collsion(that is does not undergo any deformation).Think about a fur ball,will it come back,obviously no,why is that so?This is because when a fur ball collides with the ground(assuming a concrete ground)it undergoes deformation (due to the reaction force from the ground) and the kinetic energy of the ball is used up in deforming the ball.Same is the case for a human being who undergoes deformation on hitting the ground and hence does not come back to it's initial position.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "151"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      nameera jabeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470714%2fwhy-doesnt-newtons-third-law-mean-a-person-bounces-back-to-where-they-started%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      77












      $begingroup$

      Newton's third law just says when the person is hitting the floor the force the person exerts on the ground is equal to the force the ground exerts on the person. i.e. all forces are interactions.



      Newton's third law does not say that all collisions are elastic, which is what you are proposing. When someone hits the floor most of the energy is absorbed by the person through deformation (as well as the floor, depending on what type of floor it is), but there is barely any rebound since people tend to not be very elastic. i.e. the deformation does not involve storing the energy to be released back into kinetic energy. Contrast this with a bouncy ball where much of the energy goes into deforming the ball, but since it is very elastic it is able to spring back and put energy back into motion. However, it is unlikely the collision is still perfectly elastic, as you seem to suggest in your question.



      Your misunderstanding likely comes from the imprecise usage of the words "action" and "reaction". In this case, these words refer to just forces, not entire processes. You can get some confusing questions if you don't understand this. For example, why is it that when I open my refrigerator that my refrigerator doesn't also open me?






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$









      • 4




        $begingroup$
        +1: I have been laughing like an idiot to the last sentence for 10 minutes already.
        $endgroup$
        – gented
        5 hours ago
















      77












      $begingroup$

      Newton's third law just says when the person is hitting the floor the force the person exerts on the ground is equal to the force the ground exerts on the person. i.e. all forces are interactions.



      Newton's third law does not say that all collisions are elastic, which is what you are proposing. When someone hits the floor most of the energy is absorbed by the person through deformation (as well as the floor, depending on what type of floor it is), but there is barely any rebound since people tend to not be very elastic. i.e. the deformation does not involve storing the energy to be released back into kinetic energy. Contrast this with a bouncy ball where much of the energy goes into deforming the ball, but since it is very elastic it is able to spring back and put energy back into motion. However, it is unlikely the collision is still perfectly elastic, as you seem to suggest in your question.



      Your misunderstanding likely comes from the imprecise usage of the words "action" and "reaction". In this case, these words refer to just forces, not entire processes. You can get some confusing questions if you don't understand this. For example, why is it that when I open my refrigerator that my refrigerator doesn't also open me?






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$









      • 4




        $begingroup$
        +1: I have been laughing like an idiot to the last sentence for 10 minutes already.
        $endgroup$
        – gented
        5 hours ago














      77












      77








      77





      $begingroup$

      Newton's third law just says when the person is hitting the floor the force the person exerts on the ground is equal to the force the ground exerts on the person. i.e. all forces are interactions.



      Newton's third law does not say that all collisions are elastic, which is what you are proposing. When someone hits the floor most of the energy is absorbed by the person through deformation (as well as the floor, depending on what type of floor it is), but there is barely any rebound since people tend to not be very elastic. i.e. the deformation does not involve storing the energy to be released back into kinetic energy. Contrast this with a bouncy ball where much of the energy goes into deforming the ball, but since it is very elastic it is able to spring back and put energy back into motion. However, it is unlikely the collision is still perfectly elastic, as you seem to suggest in your question.



      Your misunderstanding likely comes from the imprecise usage of the words "action" and "reaction". In this case, these words refer to just forces, not entire processes. You can get some confusing questions if you don't understand this. For example, why is it that when I open my refrigerator that my refrigerator doesn't also open me?






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Newton's third law just says when the person is hitting the floor the force the person exerts on the ground is equal to the force the ground exerts on the person. i.e. all forces are interactions.



      Newton's third law does not say that all collisions are elastic, which is what you are proposing. When someone hits the floor most of the energy is absorbed by the person through deformation (as well as the floor, depending on what type of floor it is), but there is barely any rebound since people tend to not be very elastic. i.e. the deformation does not involve storing the energy to be released back into kinetic energy. Contrast this with a bouncy ball where much of the energy goes into deforming the ball, but since it is very elastic it is able to spring back and put energy back into motion. However, it is unlikely the collision is still perfectly elastic, as you seem to suggest in your question.



      Your misunderstanding likely comes from the imprecise usage of the words "action" and "reaction". In this case, these words refer to just forces, not entire processes. You can get some confusing questions if you don't understand this. For example, why is it that when I open my refrigerator that my refrigerator doesn't also open me?







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited yesterday

























      answered 2 days ago









      Aaron StevensAaron Stevens

      14.8k42453




      14.8k42453








      • 4




        $begingroup$
        +1: I have been laughing like an idiot to the last sentence for 10 minutes already.
        $endgroup$
        – gented
        5 hours ago














      • 4




        $begingroup$
        +1: I have been laughing like an idiot to the last sentence for 10 minutes already.
        $endgroup$
        – gented
        5 hours ago








      4




      4




      $begingroup$
      +1: I have been laughing like an idiot to the last sentence for 10 minutes already.
      $endgroup$
      – gented
      5 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      +1: I have been laughing like an idiot to the last sentence for 10 minutes already.
      $endgroup$
      – gented
      5 hours ago











      9












      $begingroup$

      When your body hits the floor, it does receive an equal and opposite reaction force from the floor. But unlike a ball a body is a complex object. So not all energy is transferred back as kinetic energy. Some energy is used to produce sound, some is used to deform your body... etc. I think you are confusing force with energy. Does every ball bounce back the same amount? Newton's 3rd law talks about force only. More force doesn't always (mostly) equal to more work done.



      In your case, if all the force was used to change the body's kinetic energy somehow (which is not realistically possible), then it would have bounced back the same amount.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        9












        $begingroup$

        When your body hits the floor, it does receive an equal and opposite reaction force from the floor. But unlike a ball a body is a complex object. So not all energy is transferred back as kinetic energy. Some energy is used to produce sound, some is used to deform your body... etc. I think you are confusing force with energy. Does every ball bounce back the same amount? Newton's 3rd law talks about force only. More force doesn't always (mostly) equal to more work done.



        In your case, if all the force was used to change the body's kinetic energy somehow (which is not realistically possible), then it would have bounced back the same amount.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          9












          9








          9





          $begingroup$

          When your body hits the floor, it does receive an equal and opposite reaction force from the floor. But unlike a ball a body is a complex object. So not all energy is transferred back as kinetic energy. Some energy is used to produce sound, some is used to deform your body... etc. I think you are confusing force with energy. Does every ball bounce back the same amount? Newton's 3rd law talks about force only. More force doesn't always (mostly) equal to more work done.



          In your case, if all the force was used to change the body's kinetic energy somehow (which is not realistically possible), then it would have bounced back the same amount.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          When your body hits the floor, it does receive an equal and opposite reaction force from the floor. But unlike a ball a body is a complex object. So not all energy is transferred back as kinetic energy. Some energy is used to produce sound, some is used to deform your body... etc. I think you are confusing force with energy. Does every ball bounce back the same amount? Newton's 3rd law talks about force only. More force doesn't always (mostly) equal to more work done.



          In your case, if all the force was used to change the body's kinetic energy somehow (which is not realistically possible), then it would have bounced back the same amount.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 4 hours ago









          Jens

          2,41611431




          2,41611431










          answered 2 days ago









          LikhonLikhon

          1369




          1369























              2












              $begingroup$


              If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction.




              That's not a correct statement of Newton's third law.



              Newton's third law of motion actually says: "If one object exerts a force on another object, then the second object also exerts a force on the first object, which is of the same magnitude but in the opposite direction."



              So in this case, what Newton's third law is saying is: "If the floor pushes up on a person with a certain amount of force, then the person pushes down on the floor with the same amount of force." From this, there's no reason to think that the person would bounce back to his initial position.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$









              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Newton defined "action" to mean "change of momentum", so that the original statement is precise, but that context is not commonly given with the quote.
                $endgroup$
                – aschepler
                yesterday






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I was being a little loose with my words. Newton wrote it correctly, but as far as I know, the word "action" isn't used that way in modern English. So I feel safe calling that phrasing incorrect.
                $endgroup$
                – Tanner Swett
                16 hours ago
















              2












              $begingroup$


              If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction.




              That's not a correct statement of Newton's third law.



              Newton's third law of motion actually says: "If one object exerts a force on another object, then the second object also exerts a force on the first object, which is of the same magnitude but in the opposite direction."



              So in this case, what Newton's third law is saying is: "If the floor pushes up on a person with a certain amount of force, then the person pushes down on the floor with the same amount of force." From this, there's no reason to think that the person would bounce back to his initial position.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$









              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Newton defined "action" to mean "change of momentum", so that the original statement is precise, but that context is not commonly given with the quote.
                $endgroup$
                – aschepler
                yesterday






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I was being a little loose with my words. Newton wrote it correctly, but as far as I know, the word "action" isn't used that way in modern English. So I feel safe calling that phrasing incorrect.
                $endgroup$
                – Tanner Swett
                16 hours ago














              2












              2








              2





              $begingroup$


              If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction.




              That's not a correct statement of Newton's third law.



              Newton's third law of motion actually says: "If one object exerts a force on another object, then the second object also exerts a force on the first object, which is of the same magnitude but in the opposite direction."



              So in this case, what Newton's third law is saying is: "If the floor pushes up on a person with a certain amount of force, then the person pushes down on the floor with the same amount of force." From this, there's no reason to think that the person would bounce back to his initial position.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$




              If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction.




              That's not a correct statement of Newton's third law.



              Newton's third law of motion actually says: "If one object exerts a force on another object, then the second object also exerts a force on the first object, which is of the same magnitude but in the opposite direction."



              So in this case, what Newton's third law is saying is: "If the floor pushes up on a person with a certain amount of force, then the person pushes down on the floor with the same amount of force." From this, there's no reason to think that the person would bounce back to his initial position.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered yesterday









              Tanner SwettTanner Swett

              1718




              1718








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Newton defined "action" to mean "change of momentum", so that the original statement is precise, but that context is not commonly given with the quote.
                $endgroup$
                – aschepler
                yesterday






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I was being a little loose with my words. Newton wrote it correctly, but as far as I know, the word "action" isn't used that way in modern English. So I feel safe calling that phrasing incorrect.
                $endgroup$
                – Tanner Swett
                16 hours ago














              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Newton defined "action" to mean "change of momentum", so that the original statement is precise, but that context is not commonly given with the quote.
                $endgroup$
                – aschepler
                yesterday






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I was being a little loose with my words. Newton wrote it correctly, but as far as I know, the word "action" isn't used that way in modern English. So I feel safe calling that phrasing incorrect.
                $endgroup$
                – Tanner Swett
                16 hours ago








              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              Newton defined "action" to mean "change of momentum", so that the original statement is precise, but that context is not commonly given with the quote.
              $endgroup$
              – aschepler
              yesterday




              $begingroup$
              Newton defined "action" to mean "change of momentum", so that the original statement is precise, but that context is not commonly given with the quote.
              $endgroup$
              – aschepler
              yesterday




              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              I was being a little loose with my words. Newton wrote it correctly, but as far as I know, the word "action" isn't used that way in modern English. So I feel safe calling that phrasing incorrect.
              $endgroup$
              – Tanner Swett
              16 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              I was being a little loose with my words. Newton wrote it correctly, but as far as I know, the word "action" isn't used that way in modern English. So I feel safe calling that phrasing incorrect.
              $endgroup$
              – Tanner Swett
              16 hours ago











              1












              $begingroup$

              It's true that on the impact the human body experiences a force upwards equal to the force the body exerts downwards on the Earth: $vec{F}=frac{Deltavec{p}}{Delta t}$. Now $Deltavec{p}$ doesn't send the body's momentum in the opposite direction, but instead, all the momentum change is used to crack the bones, or more general deform the body in a horrible way (unless the person jumps from a small height, in which case he or she can give his(her)self an upward force by stretching his legs in which case he can reach the same height as where he came from, or even higher; in this case though, the energy necessary to return to the same hight comes from the body, which makes it an explosive collision and here we are talking about an inelastic collision). Some parts may bounce back upwards but are pulled back again by the rest of the body. So all kinetic energy has conversed in other forms of energy (including kinetic energy $frac{1}{2}mvec v^2$ in which most $vec{v}$'s don't have a direction upwards).






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$









              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Momentum isn't used to crack bones. That's kinetic energy.
                $endgroup$
                – wizzwizz4
                yesterday










              • $begingroup$
                Well, I think that's an equivalent way to say it. A change in momentum can crack bones. But I made an edit.
                $endgroup$
                – descheleschilder
                yesterday












              • $begingroup$
                You wrote "all the momentum is used to crack the bones". You can't use up momentum like that.
                $endgroup$
                – wizzwizz4
                yesterday
















              1












              $begingroup$

              It's true that on the impact the human body experiences a force upwards equal to the force the body exerts downwards on the Earth: $vec{F}=frac{Deltavec{p}}{Delta t}$. Now $Deltavec{p}$ doesn't send the body's momentum in the opposite direction, but instead, all the momentum change is used to crack the bones, or more general deform the body in a horrible way (unless the person jumps from a small height, in which case he or she can give his(her)self an upward force by stretching his legs in which case he can reach the same height as where he came from, or even higher; in this case though, the energy necessary to return to the same hight comes from the body, which makes it an explosive collision and here we are talking about an inelastic collision). Some parts may bounce back upwards but are pulled back again by the rest of the body. So all kinetic energy has conversed in other forms of energy (including kinetic energy $frac{1}{2}mvec v^2$ in which most $vec{v}$'s don't have a direction upwards).






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$









              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Momentum isn't used to crack bones. That's kinetic energy.
                $endgroup$
                – wizzwizz4
                yesterday










              • $begingroup$
                Well, I think that's an equivalent way to say it. A change in momentum can crack bones. But I made an edit.
                $endgroup$
                – descheleschilder
                yesterday












              • $begingroup$
                You wrote "all the momentum is used to crack the bones". You can't use up momentum like that.
                $endgroup$
                – wizzwizz4
                yesterday














              1












              1








              1





              $begingroup$

              It's true that on the impact the human body experiences a force upwards equal to the force the body exerts downwards on the Earth: $vec{F}=frac{Deltavec{p}}{Delta t}$. Now $Deltavec{p}$ doesn't send the body's momentum in the opposite direction, but instead, all the momentum change is used to crack the bones, or more general deform the body in a horrible way (unless the person jumps from a small height, in which case he or she can give his(her)self an upward force by stretching his legs in which case he can reach the same height as where he came from, or even higher; in this case though, the energy necessary to return to the same hight comes from the body, which makes it an explosive collision and here we are talking about an inelastic collision). Some parts may bounce back upwards but are pulled back again by the rest of the body. So all kinetic energy has conversed in other forms of energy (including kinetic energy $frac{1}{2}mvec v^2$ in which most $vec{v}$'s don't have a direction upwards).






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              It's true that on the impact the human body experiences a force upwards equal to the force the body exerts downwards on the Earth: $vec{F}=frac{Deltavec{p}}{Delta t}$. Now $Deltavec{p}$ doesn't send the body's momentum in the opposite direction, but instead, all the momentum change is used to crack the bones, or more general deform the body in a horrible way (unless the person jumps from a small height, in which case he or she can give his(her)self an upward force by stretching his legs in which case he can reach the same height as where he came from, or even higher; in this case though, the energy necessary to return to the same hight comes from the body, which makes it an explosive collision and here we are talking about an inelastic collision). Some parts may bounce back upwards but are pulled back again by the rest of the body. So all kinetic energy has conversed in other forms of energy (including kinetic energy $frac{1}{2}mvec v^2$ in which most $vec{v}$'s don't have a direction upwards).







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited yesterday

























              answered yesterday









              descheleschilderdescheleschilder

              4,24921445




              4,24921445








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Momentum isn't used to crack bones. That's kinetic energy.
                $endgroup$
                – wizzwizz4
                yesterday










              • $begingroup$
                Well, I think that's an equivalent way to say it. A change in momentum can crack bones. But I made an edit.
                $endgroup$
                – descheleschilder
                yesterday












              • $begingroup$
                You wrote "all the momentum is used to crack the bones". You can't use up momentum like that.
                $endgroup$
                – wizzwizz4
                yesterday














              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Momentum isn't used to crack bones. That's kinetic energy.
                $endgroup$
                – wizzwizz4
                yesterday










              • $begingroup$
                Well, I think that's an equivalent way to say it. A change in momentum can crack bones. But I made an edit.
                $endgroup$
                – descheleschilder
                yesterday












              • $begingroup$
                You wrote "all the momentum is used to crack the bones". You can't use up momentum like that.
                $endgroup$
                – wizzwizz4
                yesterday








              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              Momentum isn't used to crack bones. That's kinetic energy.
              $endgroup$
              – wizzwizz4
              yesterday




              $begingroup$
              Momentum isn't used to crack bones. That's kinetic energy.
              $endgroup$
              – wizzwizz4
              yesterday












              $begingroup$
              Well, I think that's an equivalent way to say it. A change in momentum can crack bones. But I made an edit.
              $endgroup$
              – descheleschilder
              yesterday






              $begingroup$
              Well, I think that's an equivalent way to say it. A change in momentum can crack bones. But I made an edit.
              $endgroup$
              – descheleschilder
              yesterday














              $begingroup$
              You wrote "all the momentum is used to crack the bones". You can't use up momentum like that.
              $endgroup$
              – wizzwizz4
              yesterday




              $begingroup$
              You wrote "all the momentum is used to crack the bones". You can't use up momentum like that.
              $endgroup$
              – wizzwizz4
              yesterday











              1












              $begingroup$

              Newton's third law states that when a particle applies a force on another particle then the former experiences an equal but opposite force from the other.When a ball hits the ground it comes back due to the fact that it experiences an elastic collsion(that is does not undergo any deformation).Think about a fur ball,will it come back,obviously no,why is that so?This is because when a fur ball collides with the ground(assuming a concrete ground)it undergoes deformation (due to the reaction force from the ground) and the kinetic energy of the ball is used up in deforming the ball.Same is the case for a human being who undergoes deformation on hitting the ground and hence does not come back to it's initial position.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                Newton's third law states that when a particle applies a force on another particle then the former experiences an equal but opposite force from the other.When a ball hits the ground it comes back due to the fact that it experiences an elastic collsion(that is does not undergo any deformation).Think about a fur ball,will it come back,obviously no,why is that so?This is because when a fur ball collides with the ground(assuming a concrete ground)it undergoes deformation (due to the reaction force from the ground) and the kinetic energy of the ball is used up in deforming the ball.Same is the case for a human being who undergoes deformation on hitting the ground and hence does not come back to it's initial position.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Newton's third law states that when a particle applies a force on another particle then the former experiences an equal but opposite force from the other.When a ball hits the ground it comes back due to the fact that it experiences an elastic collsion(that is does not undergo any deformation).Think about a fur ball,will it come back,obviously no,why is that so?This is because when a fur ball collides with the ground(assuming a concrete ground)it undergoes deformation (due to the reaction force from the ground) and the kinetic energy of the ball is used up in deforming the ball.Same is the case for a human being who undergoes deformation on hitting the ground and hence does not come back to it's initial position.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Newton's third law states that when a particle applies a force on another particle then the former experiences an equal but opposite force from the other.When a ball hits the ground it comes back due to the fact that it experiences an elastic collsion(that is does not undergo any deformation).Think about a fur ball,will it come back,obviously no,why is that so?This is because when a fur ball collides with the ground(assuming a concrete ground)it undergoes deformation (due to the reaction force from the ground) and the kinetic energy of the ball is used up in deforming the ball.Same is the case for a human being who undergoes deformation on hitting the ground and hence does not come back to it's initial position.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  SagnikSagnik

                  495




                  495






















                      nameera jabeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      nameera jabeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      nameera jabeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      nameera jabeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470714%2fwhy-doesnt-newtons-third-law-mean-a-person-bounces-back-to-where-they-started%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...

                      Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Mirandela Referências Menu de...

                      looking for continuous Screen Capture for retroactivly reproducing errors, timeback machineRolling desktop...