Non-Borel set in arbitrary metric spaceDerived Sets in arbitrary metric space$A subseteq (X,d)$ is compact....
Checking @@ROWCOUNT failing
How to test the sharpness of a knife?
Highest stage count that are used one right after the other?
Is there a POSIX way to shutdown a UNIX machine?
Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup
Magnifying glass in hyperbolic space
What do the positive and negative (+/-) transmit and receive pins mean on Ethernet cables?
Why would five hundred and five same as one?
How do I prevent inappropriate ads from appearing in my game?
How can a new country break out from a developed country without war?
Mortal danger in mid-grade literature
What is the meaning of "You've never met a graph you didn't like?"
Started in 1987 vs. Starting in 1987
Put the phone down / Put down the phone
Showing mass murder in a kid's book
Reasons for having MCU pin-states default to pull-up/down out of reset
What (if any) is the reason to buy in small local stores?
How to preserve electronics (computers, ipads, phones) for hundreds of years?
Hashing password to increase entropy
What is the purpose of using a decision tree?
Are all namekians brothers?
How to split IPA spelling into syllables
Does capillary rise violate hydrostatic paradox?
Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?
Non-Borel set in arbitrary metric space
Derived Sets in arbitrary metric space$A subseteq (X,d)$ is compact. Which metric $p$ makes $(A times A,p)$ also compact and $d: (A times A,p) rightarrow [0,infty)$ continuous?Borel sets and measurabilityapproximate a Borel set by a continuousAn example of Lebesgue measurable set but not Borel measurable besides the “subset of Cantor set” example.A Borel subset of a topological spaceseparability of a metric spacetotally disconnected and non Borel set.What do metric spaces look like?How do we get the notion “Borel regular” measures?
$begingroup$
Most sources give non-Borel set in Euclidean space. I wonder if there is a way to construct such sets in arbitrary metric space. In particular, is there a non-borel set in $C[0,1]$ all continuous functions on $[0,1]$ where metrics is supremum.
real-analysis general-topology functional-analysis measure-theory
asked 4 hours ago
Daniel LiDaniel Li
752414
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Most sources give non-Borel set in Euclidean space. I wonder if there is a way to construct such sets in arbitrary metric space. In particular, is there a non-borel set in $C[0,1]$ all continuous functions on $[0,1]$ where metrics is supremum.
real-analysis general-topology functional-analysis measure-theory
asked 4 hours ago
Daniel LiDaniel Li
752414
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Most sources give non-Borel set in Euclidean space. I wonder if there is a way to construct such sets in arbitrary metric space. In particular, is there a non-borel set in $C[0,1]$ all continuous functions on $[0,1]$ where metrics is supremum.
real-analysis general-topology functional-analysis measure-theory
asked 4 hours ago
Daniel LiDaniel Li
752414
$endgroup$
Most sources give non-Borel set in Euclidean space. I wonder if there is a way to construct such sets in arbitrary metric space. In particular, is there a non-borel set in $C[0,1]$ all continuous functions on $[0,1]$ where metrics is supremum.
real-analysis general-topology functional-analysis measure-theory
real-analysis general-topology functional-analysis measure-theory
asked 4 hours ago
Daniel LiDaniel Li
752414
asked 4 hours ago
Daniel LiDaniel Li
752414
asked 4 hours ago
Daniel LiDaniel Li
752414
asked 4 hours ago
Daniel LiDaniel Li
752414
asked 4 hours ago
Daniel LiDaniel Li
752414
752414
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, there is indeed examples of non-Borel sets in $C[0,1]$ of all continuous functions from $[0,1]$ to $mathbb{R}$ equipped with the uniform norm. Namely, the subset of all continuous nowhere differentiable functions is not a Borel set.
This result can be found in:
Mauldin, R. Daniel. The set of continuous nowhere differentiable functions. Pacific J. Math. 83 (1979), no. 1, 199--205.
In regards to the question on whether it is possible to construct non-Borel sets in arbitrary metric spaces, then the answer is no. Consider the metric space $({x,y},d)$ equipped with the discrete metric $d:{x,y}times {x,y} to {0,1}$ given by
$$
d(x,y)=1, quad d(x,x)=d(y,y)=0.
$$
The Borel sigma algebra on this metric space is given by
$$
{{x},{y},{x,y},emptyset} = mathcal{P}({x,y})
$$
where $mathcal{P}({x,y})$ is the powerset of ${x,y}$, so all subsets are Borel measurable sets.
answered 4 hours ago
MartinMartin
1,106917
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1.... With the discrete metric on any set, all subsets are open, and a fortiori, are Borel. Another example would be any countable metric space $X,$ as any $Ysubset X$ is equal to $ cup {{y}:yin Y},$ which is a countable union of closed sets
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
14 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Martin gave a specific example in $C[0,1]$ and showed that the general example is negative. Let me argue that a broad class of spaces has a positive answer:
In any second-countable topological space, there are only continuum-many Borel sets. Since space with at least continuum many points has more than continuum many subsets, this means that every second-countable space with continuum many points has non-Borel subsets.
answered 3 hours ago
Noah SchweberNoah Schweber
127k10151290
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154781%2fnon-borel-set-in-arbitrary-metric-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, there is indeed examples of non-Borel sets in $C[0,1]$ of all continuous functions from $[0,1]$ to $mathbb{R}$ equipped with the uniform norm. Namely, the subset of all continuous nowhere differentiable functions is not a Borel set.
This result can be found in:
Mauldin, R. Daniel. The set of continuous nowhere differentiable functions. Pacific J. Math. 83 (1979), no. 1, 199--205.
In regards to the question on whether it is possible to construct non-Borel sets in arbitrary metric spaces, then the answer is no. Consider the metric space $({x,y},d)$ equipped with the discrete metric $d:{x,y}times {x,y} to {0,1}$ given by
$$
d(x,y)=1, quad d(x,x)=d(y,y)=0.
$$
The Borel sigma algebra on this metric space is given by
$$
{{x},{y},{x,y},emptyset} = mathcal{P}({x,y})
$$
where $mathcal{P}({x,y})$ is the powerset of ${x,y}$, so all subsets are Borel measurable sets.
answered 4 hours ago
MartinMartin
1,106917
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1.... With the discrete metric on any set, all subsets are open, and a fortiori, are Borel. Another example would be any countable metric space $X,$ as any $Ysubset X$ is equal to $ cup {{y}:yin Y},$ which is a countable union of closed sets
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
14 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, there is indeed examples of non-Borel sets in $C[0,1]$ of all continuous functions from $[0,1]$ to $mathbb{R}$ equipped with the uniform norm. Namely, the subset of all continuous nowhere differentiable functions is not a Borel set.
This result can be found in:
Mauldin, R. Daniel. The set of continuous nowhere differentiable functions. Pacific J. Math. 83 (1979), no. 1, 199--205.
In regards to the question on whether it is possible to construct non-Borel sets in arbitrary metric spaces, then the answer is no. Consider the metric space $({x,y},d)$ equipped with the discrete metric $d:{x,y}times {x,y} to {0,1}$ given by
$$
d(x,y)=1, quad d(x,x)=d(y,y)=0.
$$
The Borel sigma algebra on this metric space is given by
$$
{{x},{y},{x,y},emptyset} = mathcal{P}({x,y})
$$
where $mathcal{P}({x,y})$ is the powerset of ${x,y}$, so all subsets are Borel measurable sets.
answered 4 hours ago
MartinMartin
1,106917
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1.... With the discrete metric on any set, all subsets are open, and a fortiori, are Borel. Another example would be any countable metric space $X,$ as any $Ysubset X$ is equal to $ cup {{y}:yin Y},$ which is a countable union of closed sets
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
14 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, there is indeed examples of non-Borel sets in $C[0,1]$ of all continuous functions from $[0,1]$ to $mathbb{R}$ equipped with the uniform norm. Namely, the subset of all continuous nowhere differentiable functions is not a Borel set.
This result can be found in:
Mauldin, R. Daniel. The set of continuous nowhere differentiable functions. Pacific J. Math. 83 (1979), no. 1, 199--205.
In regards to the question on whether it is possible to construct non-Borel sets in arbitrary metric spaces, then the answer is no. Consider the metric space $({x,y},d)$ equipped with the discrete metric $d:{x,y}times {x,y} to {0,1}$ given by
$$
d(x,y)=1, quad d(x,x)=d(y,y)=0.
$$
The Borel sigma algebra on this metric space is given by
$$
{{x},{y},{x,y},emptyset} = mathcal{P}({x,y})
$$
where $mathcal{P}({x,y})$ is the powerset of ${x,y}$, so all subsets are Borel measurable sets.
answered 4 hours ago
MartinMartin
1,106917
$endgroup$
Yes, there is indeed examples of non-Borel sets in $C[0,1]$ of all continuous functions from $[0,1]$ to $mathbb{R}$ equipped with the uniform norm. Namely, the subset of all continuous nowhere differentiable functions is not a Borel set.
This result can be found in:
Mauldin, R. Daniel. The set of continuous nowhere differentiable functions. Pacific J. Math. 83 (1979), no. 1, 199--205.
In regards to the question on whether it is possible to construct non-Borel sets in arbitrary metric spaces, then the answer is no. Consider the metric space $({x,y},d)$ equipped with the discrete metric $d:{x,y}times {x,y} to {0,1}$ given by
$$
d(x,y)=1, quad d(x,x)=d(y,y)=0.
$$
The Borel sigma algebra on this metric space is given by
$$
{{x},{y},{x,y},emptyset} = mathcal{P}({x,y})
$$
where $mathcal{P}({x,y})$ is the powerset of ${x,y}$, so all subsets are Borel measurable sets.
answered 4 hours ago
MartinMartin
1,106917
edited 4 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
MartinMartin
1,106917
answered 4 hours ago
MartinMartin
1,106917
answered 4 hours ago
MartinMartin
1,106917
1,106917
$begingroup$
+1.... With the discrete metric on any set, all subsets are open, and a fortiori, are Borel. Another example would be any countable metric space $X,$ as any $Ysubset X$ is equal to $ cup {{y}:yin Y},$ which is a countable union of closed sets
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
14 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
+1.... With the discrete metric on any set, all subsets are open, and a fortiori, are Borel. Another example would be any countable metric space $X,$ as any $Ysubset X$ is equal to $ cup {{y}:yin Y},$ which is a countable union of closed sets
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
14 mins ago
$begingroup$
+1.... With the discrete metric on any set, all subsets are open, and a fortiori, are Borel. Another example would be any countable metric space $X,$ as any $Ysubset X$ is equal to $ cup {{y}:yin Y},$ which is a countable union of closed sets
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
14 mins ago
$begingroup$
+1.... With the discrete metric on any set, all subsets are open, and a fortiori, are Borel. Another example would be any countable metric space $X,$ as any $Ysubset X$ is equal to $ cup {{y}:yin Y},$ which is a countable union of closed sets
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
14 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Martin gave a specific example in $C[0,1]$ and showed that the general example is negative. Let me argue that a broad class of spaces has a positive answer:
In any second-countable topological space, there are only continuum-many Borel sets. Since space with at least continuum many points has more than continuum many subsets, this means that every second-countable space with continuum many points has non-Borel subsets.
answered 3 hours ago
Noah SchweberNoah Schweber
127k10151290
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Martin gave a specific example in $C[0,1]$ and showed that the general example is negative. Let me argue that a broad class of spaces has a positive answer:
In any second-countable topological space, there are only continuum-many Borel sets. Since space with at least continuum many points has more than continuum many subsets, this means that every second-countable space with continuum many points has non-Borel subsets.
answered 3 hours ago
Noah SchweberNoah Schweber
127k10151290
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Martin gave a specific example in $C[0,1]$ and showed that the general example is negative. Let me argue that a broad class of spaces has a positive answer:
In any second-countable topological space, there are only continuum-many Borel sets. Since space with at least continuum many points has more than continuum many subsets, this means that every second-countable space with continuum many points has non-Borel subsets.
answered 3 hours ago
Noah SchweberNoah Schweber
127k10151290
$endgroup$
Martin gave a specific example in $C[0,1]$ and showed that the general example is negative. Let me argue that a broad class of spaces has a positive answer:
In any second-countable topological space, there are only continuum-many Borel sets. Since space with at least continuum many points has more than continuum many subsets, this means that every second-countable space with continuum many points has non-Borel subsets.
answered 3 hours ago
Noah SchweberNoah Schweber
127k10151290
answered 3 hours ago
Noah SchweberNoah Schweber
127k10151290
answered 3 hours ago
Noah SchweberNoah Schweber
127k10151290
answered 3 hours ago
Noah SchweberNoah Schweber
127k10151290
127k10151290
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154781%2fnon-borel-set-in-arbitrary-metric-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
