Is there a way to not have to poll the UART of an AVR?Using the arduino toolchain as a convenent way to get...

Does the US government have any planning in place to ensure there's no shortages of food, fuel, steel and other commodities?

Has any human ever had the choice to leave Earth permanently?

Microtypography protrusion with Polish quotation marks

What is a good reason for every spaceship to carry a weapon on board?

Single-row INSERT...SELECT much slower than separate SELECT

Renting a 2CV in France

How to write cases in LaTeX?

Are the positive and negative planes inner or outer planes in the Great Wheel cosmology model?

Is there a file that always exists and a 'normal' user can't lstat it?

Why does 0.-5 evaluate to -5?

Is there a verb that means to inject with poison?

How vim overwrites readonly mode?

When obtaining gender reassignment/plastic surgery overseas, is an emergency travel document required to return home?

Eww, those bytes are gross

Plausible reason to leave the Solar System?

What can I do to encourage my players to use their consumables?

Critique vs nitpicking

What senses are available to a corpse subjected to a Speak with Dead spell?

Converting very wide logos to square formats

Cat is tipping over bed-side lamps during the night

Should I cite R or RStudio?

Equivalent of "illegal" for violating civil law

Crack the bank account's password!

Why is it that Bernie Sanders is always called a "socialist"?



Is there a way to not have to poll the UART of an AVR?


Using the arduino toolchain as a convenent way to get GCC - Can you disable the code-munging?AVR USART Not ReceivingAVR external crystal not working with UARTPIC32 does not get UART RX interrupts in xc32 CompilerValid use of ISR_NOBLOCKAVR sending message via UARTBest way to connect to UART lines to multiple entitiesAVR UART synchronization problemAVR interrupt setup seems to stop program executionWhere MOSI is triggered low or high













6












$begingroup$


So I'm receiving data over UART from another AVR. However I'm doing other stuff so dont want to have constantly keep polling the UART. I know there are interrupts but i can only see one for receive complete. Which I assume still requires me to poll to the complete the transfer.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why would you need to poll to initiate a transfer? Anyway, there are interrupts for transmission completion as well. I am not very into AVR, but these can be called "TX empty" or "FIFO empty" or FIFO threshold" or similar.
    $endgroup$
    – Eugene Sh.
    7 hours ago
















6












$begingroup$


So I'm receiving data over UART from another AVR. However I'm doing other stuff so dont want to have constantly keep polling the UART. I know there are interrupts but i can only see one for receive complete. Which I assume still requires me to poll to the complete the transfer.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why would you need to poll to initiate a transfer? Anyway, there are interrupts for transmission completion as well. I am not very into AVR, but these can be called "TX empty" or "FIFO empty" or FIFO threshold" or similar.
    $endgroup$
    – Eugene Sh.
    7 hours ago














6












6








6





$begingroup$


So I'm receiving data over UART from another AVR. However I'm doing other stuff so dont want to have constantly keep polling the UART. I know there are interrupts but i can only see one for receive complete. Which I assume still requires me to poll to the complete the transfer.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




So I'm receiving data over UART from another AVR. However I'm doing other stuff so dont want to have constantly keep polling the UART. I know there are interrupts but i can only see one for receive complete. Which I assume still requires me to poll to the complete the transfer.







avr embedded






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago







Adam Makin

















asked 7 hours ago









Adam MakinAdam Makin

604




604








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why would you need to poll to initiate a transfer? Anyway, there are interrupts for transmission completion as well. I am not very into AVR, but these can be called "TX empty" or "FIFO empty" or FIFO threshold" or similar.
    $endgroup$
    – Eugene Sh.
    7 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why would you need to poll to initiate a transfer? Anyway, there are interrupts for transmission completion as well. I am not very into AVR, but these can be called "TX empty" or "FIFO empty" or FIFO threshold" or similar.
    $endgroup$
    – Eugene Sh.
    7 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Why would you need to poll to initiate a transfer? Anyway, there are interrupts for transmission completion as well. I am not very into AVR, but these can be called "TX empty" or "FIFO empty" or FIFO threshold" or similar.
$endgroup$
– Eugene Sh.
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Why would you need to poll to initiate a transfer? Anyway, there are interrupts for transmission completion as well. I am not very into AVR, but these can be called "TX empty" or "FIFO empty" or FIFO threshold" or similar.
$endgroup$
– Eugene Sh.
7 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















13












$begingroup$

There are interrupt vectors for both RXC and TXC (RX and TX complete) on AVRs. You should never have to poll for these unless you want to.



AVRFreaks has a nice post on this, and so does the manufacturer.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    The interrupt routine stores the data in a buffer (a circular buffer with put and get pointers works nicely). The main loop checks to see if there is data in the buffer and when there is, takes it out. The main loop can do other things but needs to check and remove the data before the interrupt buffer overflows (when the put meets up with the get).



    It won't compile but this illustrates the method.



    char circ_buf[BUFFER_SIZE];
    int get_index, put_index;

    void initialize(void) {
    get_index = 0;
    put_index = 0;
    }

    isr serial_port_interrupt(void) { // interrupt
    circ_buf[put_index++] = SERIAL_PORT_REGISTER;
    if(put_index==BUFFER_SIZE) put_index = 0; // circular buffer
    if(put_index==get_index) error("buffer overflow"); // oops
    }

    void background routine(void) {
    while(put_index!=get_index) { // or if()
    ch = circ_buf[get_index++];
    // do something with ch
    if(get_index==BUFFER_SIZE) get_index = 0;
    }
    }





    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
      StackExchange.schematics.init();
      });
      }, "cicuitlab");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "135"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f424331%2fis-there-a-way-to-not-have-to-poll-the-uart-of-an-avr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      13












      $begingroup$

      There are interrupt vectors for both RXC and TXC (RX and TX complete) on AVRs. You should never have to poll for these unless you want to.



      AVRFreaks has a nice post on this, and so does the manufacturer.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        13












        $begingroup$

        There are interrupt vectors for both RXC and TXC (RX and TX complete) on AVRs. You should never have to poll for these unless you want to.



        AVRFreaks has a nice post on this, and so does the manufacturer.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          13












          13








          13





          $begingroup$

          There are interrupt vectors for both RXC and TXC (RX and TX complete) on AVRs. You should never have to poll for these unless you want to.



          AVRFreaks has a nice post on this, and so does the manufacturer.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          There are interrupt vectors for both RXC and TXC (RX and TX complete) on AVRs. You should never have to poll for these unless you want to.



          AVRFreaks has a nice post on this, and so does the manufacturer.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          evildemonicevildemonic

          2,110719




          2,110719

























              0












              $begingroup$

              The interrupt routine stores the data in a buffer (a circular buffer with put and get pointers works nicely). The main loop checks to see if there is data in the buffer and when there is, takes it out. The main loop can do other things but needs to check and remove the data before the interrupt buffer overflows (when the put meets up with the get).



              It won't compile but this illustrates the method.



              char circ_buf[BUFFER_SIZE];
              int get_index, put_index;

              void initialize(void) {
              get_index = 0;
              put_index = 0;
              }

              isr serial_port_interrupt(void) { // interrupt
              circ_buf[put_index++] = SERIAL_PORT_REGISTER;
              if(put_index==BUFFER_SIZE) put_index = 0; // circular buffer
              if(put_index==get_index) error("buffer overflow"); // oops
              }

              void background routine(void) {
              while(put_index!=get_index) { // or if()
              ch = circ_buf[get_index++];
              // do something with ch
              if(get_index==BUFFER_SIZE) get_index = 0;
              }
              }





              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                The interrupt routine stores the data in a buffer (a circular buffer with put and get pointers works nicely). The main loop checks to see if there is data in the buffer and when there is, takes it out. The main loop can do other things but needs to check and remove the data before the interrupt buffer overflows (when the put meets up with the get).



                It won't compile but this illustrates the method.



                char circ_buf[BUFFER_SIZE];
                int get_index, put_index;

                void initialize(void) {
                get_index = 0;
                put_index = 0;
                }

                isr serial_port_interrupt(void) { // interrupt
                circ_buf[put_index++] = SERIAL_PORT_REGISTER;
                if(put_index==BUFFER_SIZE) put_index = 0; // circular buffer
                if(put_index==get_index) error("buffer overflow"); // oops
                }

                void background routine(void) {
                while(put_index!=get_index) { // or if()
                ch = circ_buf[get_index++];
                // do something with ch
                if(get_index==BUFFER_SIZE) get_index = 0;
                }
                }





                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  The interrupt routine stores the data in a buffer (a circular buffer with put and get pointers works nicely). The main loop checks to see if there is data in the buffer and when there is, takes it out. The main loop can do other things but needs to check and remove the data before the interrupt buffer overflows (when the put meets up with the get).



                  It won't compile but this illustrates the method.



                  char circ_buf[BUFFER_SIZE];
                  int get_index, put_index;

                  void initialize(void) {
                  get_index = 0;
                  put_index = 0;
                  }

                  isr serial_port_interrupt(void) { // interrupt
                  circ_buf[put_index++] = SERIAL_PORT_REGISTER;
                  if(put_index==BUFFER_SIZE) put_index = 0; // circular buffer
                  if(put_index==get_index) error("buffer overflow"); // oops
                  }

                  void background routine(void) {
                  while(put_index!=get_index) { // or if()
                  ch = circ_buf[get_index++];
                  // do something with ch
                  if(get_index==BUFFER_SIZE) get_index = 0;
                  }
                  }





                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  The interrupt routine stores the data in a buffer (a circular buffer with put and get pointers works nicely). The main loop checks to see if there is data in the buffer and when there is, takes it out. The main loop can do other things but needs to check and remove the data before the interrupt buffer overflows (when the put meets up with the get).



                  It won't compile but this illustrates the method.



                  char circ_buf[BUFFER_SIZE];
                  int get_index, put_index;

                  void initialize(void) {
                  get_index = 0;
                  put_index = 0;
                  }

                  isr serial_port_interrupt(void) { // interrupt
                  circ_buf[put_index++] = SERIAL_PORT_REGISTER;
                  if(put_index==BUFFER_SIZE) put_index = 0; // circular buffer
                  if(put_index==get_index) error("buffer overflow"); // oops
                  }

                  void background routine(void) {
                  while(put_index!=get_index) { // or if()
                  ch = circ_buf[get_index++];
                  // do something with ch
                  if(get_index==BUFFER_SIZE) get_index = 0;
                  }
                  }






                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  WarrenWarren

                  763




                  763






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f424331%2fis-there-a-way-to-not-have-to-poll-the-uart-of-an-avr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...

                      Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Mirandela Referências Menu de...

                      looking for continuous Screen Capture for retroactivly reproducing errors, timeback machineRolling desktop...