CPU-Z reports two memory modules in dual mode and 2 modules in single modeShould I be worrying about Single...

PTIJ: Who should pay for Uber rides: the child or the parent?

An Accountant Seeks the Help of a Mathematician

How to write cleanly even if my character uses expletive language?

Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?

Will a pinhole camera work with instant film?

Could the Saturn V actually have launched astronauts around Venus?

Does this AnyDice function accurately calculate the number of ogres you make unconcious with three 4th-level castings of Sleep?

Latest web browser compatible with Windows 98

Why do Australian milk farmers need to protest supermarkets' milk price?

How could a female member of a species produce eggs unto death?

Welcoming 2019 Pi day: How to draw the letter π?

Ban on all campaign finance?

Know when to turn notes upside-down(eighth notes, sixteen notes, etc.)

Calculus II Professor will not accept my correct integral evaluation that uses a different method, should I bring this up further?

How do anti-virus programs start at Windows boot?

How could a scammer know the apps on my phone / iTunes account?

I need to drive a 7/16" nut but am unsure how to use the socket I bought for my screwdriver

Define, (actually define) the "stability" and "energy" of a compound

Why would a flight no longer considered airworthy be redirected like this?

How to deal with taxi scam when on vacation?

Who is our nearest planetary neighbor, on average?

What is the greatest age difference between a married couple in Tanach?

At what level can a dragon innately cast its spells?

When do we add an hyphen (-) to a complex adjective word?



CPU-Z reports two memory modules in dual mode and 2 modules in single mode


Should I be worrying about Single Channel and Double Channel for my RAM?Can two same single RAM chips start to work in dual channel?Memory speed: single and dual channelCan a “Dual Rank Memory Module” be used as a single module and not have it affect other slots?How to check if RAM works in dual-channel modeMemory Runs at Flex Memory ModeWhy and how is my memory running in dual-channel mode?Will CPU-Z report Duel Channel if added second memory module?Why does my computer think that there are different memory modules in it the actual ones?Channels and memory configuration in a new PC build













0















The main question:
Why does CPU-Z report the pairs of two 2GB modules as in dual mode and the two 1GB modules as in single mode? I don 't think this is how Intel 'FLEX' memory controller technology is supposed to work from what I have read. FLEX allows two different sizes of modules to run on a machine but they are supposed to be either dual or in single mode depending on configuration of what slots they are occupying. These are the original modules as this system came with 6GB or RAM. They are identical in voltage, timing, latency and brand with the exception of the size being 2-2GB and 2-1GB modules.



Below is an illustration of is the original memory configuration. This made no sense since it looks like the only purpose would be to attempt to et 3GB on each channel. But from what I have read, no memory controller technology works this way that I have yet heard of or read about. This machine was abandoned and given away due to a boot issue. My friend, the original owner, had taken it to a repair shop. So, I don't know if they removed the memory and reconfigured it this way or if it was original like this from the Acer factory.



The original memory Configuration as of when I received this machine
Original Memory Configuration



Below is the memory configuration that I ended up switching to and I will explain why later. I ended up with this after testing every possible config. Two of the same size pair in the same colored slot, and then one in black and one in blue. One of each size pairs in the same colored slot, and then one in black and one in blue.



Current Memory Configuration
Current Memory Configuration



My research came up with no real standard on memory slot/socket color codes but most info suggest that 70% of the time it delineates channels 1 and 2, whereas on Intel boards it is more like 80-90% it is for channel delineation. What does not make sense is that no matter where the memory modules are inserted, the 2GB mods always show in CPU-Z as dual channel mode and the 1GB modules always show running in single channel mode. This means or shows that when a 2GB and 1GB are inserted on the same channel, CPU-Z is reporting that channel to be running in dual and single mode simultaneously. I believe this to be impossible as I don't know any technology that allows a single memory channel to run both dual and single mode at the same time simultaneously. I am assuming something else is wrong. Perhaps CPU-Z not reporting correctly.



Below is a chart showing the test where I ran CPU-Z on both the original config and the current one I ended on, highlighting CPU-Z confusion of reporting impossibilities. I am not completely sure which two slot/sockets are channel one and which are channel two as there is no documentation to be found for this G43 MB but I am assuming the current configuration I have it on now is correct for dual channel mode.
Memory Configuration Test Chart



The reason I believe the current config change to be correct and the previous one to be wrong is simply, the system booted much faster. With the original module configuration that put the same pair on separate colors made, the boot time not only increased but the boot screen and the account log-in screen after the system went into user mode would flash. Meaning it would go blank and reappear two or three times. Sometimes the account user name would appear first, followed by a blue background for a couple seconds before the default intended background would load. Also for two days the system seams more stable without the previous boot issue mentioned next.



Previous/Current Boot Issue:
I say both current and previous in case the memory reconfig fixed it.
The booting issues on this Acer Aspire AM3900G that went through a windows 10 upgrade. The firs BSOD was 'CRITICAL_PROCESS_DIED' followed by 'INACCESSIBLE_BOOT_DEVICE'. I somehow thought I fixed it by playing around with a Windows 7 disk repair option to access the cmd using the typical commands below.
bootrec /FixMbr



bootrec /FixBoot



bootrec /ScanOs



bootrec /RebuildBcd



It seamed like these commands got it to boot after about 4 separate BSOD's but then I was trying different thins so I can't confirm that. I may have thrown in a scndsk command in there but after the BSOD it will show error 0cx0000225.



QUESTION: Was it having boot issues because of a poor or less than ideal memory configuration?



Other Curious Unexplained Phenomena:
The BIOS disk controller setting is set to RAID. Not sure why it would be set to RAID since the system only has 1 HDD unless this is some trick on getting a Windows 10 upgrade to stick. That could also be the boot issue showing the BSOD. Maybe the memory configuration had nothing to do the the boot issue.



QUESTION: Is the RAM configuration more likely to cause a boot issue or this RAID setting?









share



























    0















    The main question:
    Why does CPU-Z report the pairs of two 2GB modules as in dual mode and the two 1GB modules as in single mode? I don 't think this is how Intel 'FLEX' memory controller technology is supposed to work from what I have read. FLEX allows two different sizes of modules to run on a machine but they are supposed to be either dual or in single mode depending on configuration of what slots they are occupying. These are the original modules as this system came with 6GB or RAM. They are identical in voltage, timing, latency and brand with the exception of the size being 2-2GB and 2-1GB modules.



    Below is an illustration of is the original memory configuration. This made no sense since it looks like the only purpose would be to attempt to et 3GB on each channel. But from what I have read, no memory controller technology works this way that I have yet heard of or read about. This machine was abandoned and given away due to a boot issue. My friend, the original owner, had taken it to a repair shop. So, I don't know if they removed the memory and reconfigured it this way or if it was original like this from the Acer factory.



    The original memory Configuration as of when I received this machine
    Original Memory Configuration



    Below is the memory configuration that I ended up switching to and I will explain why later. I ended up with this after testing every possible config. Two of the same size pair in the same colored slot, and then one in black and one in blue. One of each size pairs in the same colored slot, and then one in black and one in blue.



    Current Memory Configuration
    Current Memory Configuration



    My research came up with no real standard on memory slot/socket color codes but most info suggest that 70% of the time it delineates channels 1 and 2, whereas on Intel boards it is more like 80-90% it is for channel delineation. What does not make sense is that no matter where the memory modules are inserted, the 2GB mods always show in CPU-Z as dual channel mode and the 1GB modules always show running in single channel mode. This means or shows that when a 2GB and 1GB are inserted on the same channel, CPU-Z is reporting that channel to be running in dual and single mode simultaneously. I believe this to be impossible as I don't know any technology that allows a single memory channel to run both dual and single mode at the same time simultaneously. I am assuming something else is wrong. Perhaps CPU-Z not reporting correctly.



    Below is a chart showing the test where I ran CPU-Z on both the original config and the current one I ended on, highlighting CPU-Z confusion of reporting impossibilities. I am not completely sure which two slot/sockets are channel one and which are channel two as there is no documentation to be found for this G43 MB but I am assuming the current configuration I have it on now is correct for dual channel mode.
    Memory Configuration Test Chart



    The reason I believe the current config change to be correct and the previous one to be wrong is simply, the system booted much faster. With the original module configuration that put the same pair on separate colors made, the boot time not only increased but the boot screen and the account log-in screen after the system went into user mode would flash. Meaning it would go blank and reappear two or three times. Sometimes the account user name would appear first, followed by a blue background for a couple seconds before the default intended background would load. Also for two days the system seams more stable without the previous boot issue mentioned next.



    Previous/Current Boot Issue:
    I say both current and previous in case the memory reconfig fixed it.
    The booting issues on this Acer Aspire AM3900G that went through a windows 10 upgrade. The firs BSOD was 'CRITICAL_PROCESS_DIED' followed by 'INACCESSIBLE_BOOT_DEVICE'. I somehow thought I fixed it by playing around with a Windows 7 disk repair option to access the cmd using the typical commands below.
    bootrec /FixMbr



    bootrec /FixBoot



    bootrec /ScanOs



    bootrec /RebuildBcd



    It seamed like these commands got it to boot after about 4 separate BSOD's but then I was trying different thins so I can't confirm that. I may have thrown in a scndsk command in there but after the BSOD it will show error 0cx0000225.



    QUESTION: Was it having boot issues because of a poor or less than ideal memory configuration?



    Other Curious Unexplained Phenomena:
    The BIOS disk controller setting is set to RAID. Not sure why it would be set to RAID since the system only has 1 HDD unless this is some trick on getting a Windows 10 upgrade to stick. That could also be the boot issue showing the BSOD. Maybe the memory configuration had nothing to do the the boot issue.



    QUESTION: Is the RAM configuration more likely to cause a boot issue or this RAID setting?









    share

























      0












      0








      0








      The main question:
      Why does CPU-Z report the pairs of two 2GB modules as in dual mode and the two 1GB modules as in single mode? I don 't think this is how Intel 'FLEX' memory controller technology is supposed to work from what I have read. FLEX allows two different sizes of modules to run on a machine but they are supposed to be either dual or in single mode depending on configuration of what slots they are occupying. These are the original modules as this system came with 6GB or RAM. They are identical in voltage, timing, latency and brand with the exception of the size being 2-2GB and 2-1GB modules.



      Below is an illustration of is the original memory configuration. This made no sense since it looks like the only purpose would be to attempt to et 3GB on each channel. But from what I have read, no memory controller technology works this way that I have yet heard of or read about. This machine was abandoned and given away due to a boot issue. My friend, the original owner, had taken it to a repair shop. So, I don't know if they removed the memory and reconfigured it this way or if it was original like this from the Acer factory.



      The original memory Configuration as of when I received this machine
      Original Memory Configuration



      Below is the memory configuration that I ended up switching to and I will explain why later. I ended up with this after testing every possible config. Two of the same size pair in the same colored slot, and then one in black and one in blue. One of each size pairs in the same colored slot, and then one in black and one in blue.



      Current Memory Configuration
      Current Memory Configuration



      My research came up with no real standard on memory slot/socket color codes but most info suggest that 70% of the time it delineates channels 1 and 2, whereas on Intel boards it is more like 80-90% it is for channel delineation. What does not make sense is that no matter where the memory modules are inserted, the 2GB mods always show in CPU-Z as dual channel mode and the 1GB modules always show running in single channel mode. This means or shows that when a 2GB and 1GB are inserted on the same channel, CPU-Z is reporting that channel to be running in dual and single mode simultaneously. I believe this to be impossible as I don't know any technology that allows a single memory channel to run both dual and single mode at the same time simultaneously. I am assuming something else is wrong. Perhaps CPU-Z not reporting correctly.



      Below is a chart showing the test where I ran CPU-Z on both the original config and the current one I ended on, highlighting CPU-Z confusion of reporting impossibilities. I am not completely sure which two slot/sockets are channel one and which are channel two as there is no documentation to be found for this G43 MB but I am assuming the current configuration I have it on now is correct for dual channel mode.
      Memory Configuration Test Chart



      The reason I believe the current config change to be correct and the previous one to be wrong is simply, the system booted much faster. With the original module configuration that put the same pair on separate colors made, the boot time not only increased but the boot screen and the account log-in screen after the system went into user mode would flash. Meaning it would go blank and reappear two or three times. Sometimes the account user name would appear first, followed by a blue background for a couple seconds before the default intended background would load. Also for two days the system seams more stable without the previous boot issue mentioned next.



      Previous/Current Boot Issue:
      I say both current and previous in case the memory reconfig fixed it.
      The booting issues on this Acer Aspire AM3900G that went through a windows 10 upgrade. The firs BSOD was 'CRITICAL_PROCESS_DIED' followed by 'INACCESSIBLE_BOOT_DEVICE'. I somehow thought I fixed it by playing around with a Windows 7 disk repair option to access the cmd using the typical commands below.
      bootrec /FixMbr



      bootrec /FixBoot



      bootrec /ScanOs



      bootrec /RebuildBcd



      It seamed like these commands got it to boot after about 4 separate BSOD's but then I was trying different thins so I can't confirm that. I may have thrown in a scndsk command in there but after the BSOD it will show error 0cx0000225.



      QUESTION: Was it having boot issues because of a poor or less than ideal memory configuration?



      Other Curious Unexplained Phenomena:
      The BIOS disk controller setting is set to RAID. Not sure why it would be set to RAID since the system only has 1 HDD unless this is some trick on getting a Windows 10 upgrade to stick. That could also be the boot issue showing the BSOD. Maybe the memory configuration had nothing to do the the boot issue.



      QUESTION: Is the RAM configuration more likely to cause a boot issue or this RAID setting?









      share














      The main question:
      Why does CPU-Z report the pairs of two 2GB modules as in dual mode and the two 1GB modules as in single mode? I don 't think this is how Intel 'FLEX' memory controller technology is supposed to work from what I have read. FLEX allows two different sizes of modules to run on a machine but they are supposed to be either dual or in single mode depending on configuration of what slots they are occupying. These are the original modules as this system came with 6GB or RAM. They are identical in voltage, timing, latency and brand with the exception of the size being 2-2GB and 2-1GB modules.



      Below is an illustration of is the original memory configuration. This made no sense since it looks like the only purpose would be to attempt to et 3GB on each channel. But from what I have read, no memory controller technology works this way that I have yet heard of or read about. This machine was abandoned and given away due to a boot issue. My friend, the original owner, had taken it to a repair shop. So, I don't know if they removed the memory and reconfigured it this way or if it was original like this from the Acer factory.



      The original memory Configuration as of when I received this machine
      Original Memory Configuration



      Below is the memory configuration that I ended up switching to and I will explain why later. I ended up with this after testing every possible config. Two of the same size pair in the same colored slot, and then one in black and one in blue. One of each size pairs in the same colored slot, and then one in black and one in blue.



      Current Memory Configuration
      Current Memory Configuration



      My research came up with no real standard on memory slot/socket color codes but most info suggest that 70% of the time it delineates channels 1 and 2, whereas on Intel boards it is more like 80-90% it is for channel delineation. What does not make sense is that no matter where the memory modules are inserted, the 2GB mods always show in CPU-Z as dual channel mode and the 1GB modules always show running in single channel mode. This means or shows that when a 2GB and 1GB are inserted on the same channel, CPU-Z is reporting that channel to be running in dual and single mode simultaneously. I believe this to be impossible as I don't know any technology that allows a single memory channel to run both dual and single mode at the same time simultaneously. I am assuming something else is wrong. Perhaps CPU-Z not reporting correctly.



      Below is a chart showing the test where I ran CPU-Z on both the original config and the current one I ended on, highlighting CPU-Z confusion of reporting impossibilities. I am not completely sure which two slot/sockets are channel one and which are channel two as there is no documentation to be found for this G43 MB but I am assuming the current configuration I have it on now is correct for dual channel mode.
      Memory Configuration Test Chart



      The reason I believe the current config change to be correct and the previous one to be wrong is simply, the system booted much faster. With the original module configuration that put the same pair on separate colors made, the boot time not only increased but the boot screen and the account log-in screen after the system went into user mode would flash. Meaning it would go blank and reappear two or three times. Sometimes the account user name would appear first, followed by a blue background for a couple seconds before the default intended background would load. Also for two days the system seams more stable without the previous boot issue mentioned next.



      Previous/Current Boot Issue:
      I say both current and previous in case the memory reconfig fixed it.
      The booting issues on this Acer Aspire AM3900G that went through a windows 10 upgrade. The firs BSOD was 'CRITICAL_PROCESS_DIED' followed by 'INACCESSIBLE_BOOT_DEVICE'. I somehow thought I fixed it by playing around with a Windows 7 disk repair option to access the cmd using the typical commands below.
      bootrec /FixMbr



      bootrec /FixBoot



      bootrec /ScanOs



      bootrec /RebuildBcd



      It seamed like these commands got it to boot after about 4 separate BSOD's but then I was trying different thins so I can't confirm that. I may have thrown in a scndsk command in there but after the BSOD it will show error 0cx0000225.



      QUESTION: Was it having boot issues because of a poor or less than ideal memory configuration?



      Other Curious Unexplained Phenomena:
      The BIOS disk controller setting is set to RAID. Not sure why it would be set to RAID since the system only has 1 HDD unless this is some trick on getting a Windows 10 upgrade to stick. That could also be the boot issue showing the BSOD. Maybe the memory configuration had nothing to do the the boot issue.



      QUESTION: Is the RAM configuration more likely to cause a boot issue or this RAID setting?







      boot memory bsod cpu-z flex





      share












      share










      share



      share










      asked 3 mins ago









      Rich MansonRich Manson

      239211




      239211






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "3"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1414175%2fcpu-z-reports-two-memory-modules-in-dual-mode-and-2-modules-in-single-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1414175%2fcpu-z-reports-two-memory-modules-in-dual-mode-and-2-modules-in-single-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Couldn't open a raw socket. Error: Permission denied (13) (nmap)Is it possible to run networking commands...

          VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...

          Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll? Announcing the arrival of...