The No-Straight MazeThe Origins of a Confusing MazeEdward's Maze IA-maze-ing WordsearchAlice and the Fractal...

What's the oldest plausible frozen specimen for a Jurassic Park style story-line?

How much light is too much?

Can my friend and I spend the summer in Canada (6 weeks) at 16 years old without an adult?

Why is it that Bernie Sanders is always called a "socialist"?

Why didn't Tom Riddle take the presence of Fawkes and the Sorting Hat as more of a threat?

How can I prevent an oracle who can see into the past from knowing everything that has happened?

Charging phone battery with a lower voltage, coming from a bike charger?

Coworker asking me to not bring cakes due to self control issue. What should I do?

Boss asked me to sign a resignation paper without a date on it along with my new contract

What is a good reason for every spaceship to carry gun on board?

Sharepoint metadata URL

Am I correct in stating that the study of topology is purely theoretical?

Can a player sacrifice a creature after declaring that creature as blocker while taking lethal damage?

Word for something that's always reliable, but never the best?

Sitecore 9.1 Installation - Skip to particular step

Book where a space ship journeys to the center of the galaxy to find all the stars had gone supernova

Plausible reason for gold-digging ant

Why did Ylvis use "go" instead of "say" in phrases like "Dog goes 'woof'"?

Is the fingering of thirds flexible or do I have to follow the rules?

Prevent Nautilus / Nemo from creating .Trash-1000 folder in mounted devices

How vim overwrites readonly mode?

Are the positive and negative planes inner or outer planes in the Great Wheel cosmology model?

Reading Mishnayos without understanding

How do you funnel food off a cutting board?



The No-Straight Maze


The Origins of a Confusing MazeEdward's Maze IA-maze-ing WordsearchAlice and the Fractal Hedge MazeA-maze-ing TilesCryptic Clue MazeHelp me to find a small but hard and clever mazeCreate a changeable mazeNodes & TunnelsMore Nodes & Tunnels - The Tower













13












$begingroup$


Consider the following maze.



an image of the maze



You can walk on the black lines, and your aim is to go from the green at the maze's bottom to the red on the left side. However, each time you reach an intersection of three or more black paths (spokes), you must turn 90 degrees either direction, rather than continuing straight.




Find a valid path through the maze, or prove that no such solution exists.





  • It's not a lateral-thinking puzzle; the solution is not a trick.

  • If you arrive at a corner, simply follow the path.

  • You cannot suddenly turn around and walk the other way, but you may retrace your steps otherwise.

  • It's a puzzle of my own creation, and I already have the solution.

  • The missing line in the middle of the maze is intentional.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    13












    $begingroup$


    Consider the following maze.



    an image of the maze



    You can walk on the black lines, and your aim is to go from the green at the maze's bottom to the red on the left side. However, each time you reach an intersection of three or more black paths (spokes), you must turn 90 degrees either direction, rather than continuing straight.




    Find a valid path through the maze, or prove that no such solution exists.





    • It's not a lateral-thinking puzzle; the solution is not a trick.

    • If you arrive at a corner, simply follow the path.

    • You cannot suddenly turn around and walk the other way, but you may retrace your steps otherwise.

    • It's a puzzle of my own creation, and I already have the solution.

    • The missing line in the middle of the maze is intentional.










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      13












      13








      13





      $begingroup$


      Consider the following maze.



      an image of the maze



      You can walk on the black lines, and your aim is to go from the green at the maze's bottom to the red on the left side. However, each time you reach an intersection of three or more black paths (spokes), you must turn 90 degrees either direction, rather than continuing straight.




      Find a valid path through the maze, or prove that no such solution exists.





      • It's not a lateral-thinking puzzle; the solution is not a trick.

      • If you arrive at a corner, simply follow the path.

      • You cannot suddenly turn around and walk the other way, but you may retrace your steps otherwise.

      • It's a puzzle of my own creation, and I already have the solution.

      • The missing line in the middle of the maze is intentional.










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Consider the following maze.



      an image of the maze



      You can walk on the black lines, and your aim is to go from the green at the maze's bottom to the red on the left side. However, each time you reach an intersection of three or more black paths (spokes), you must turn 90 degrees either direction, rather than continuing straight.




      Find a valid path through the maze, or prove that no such solution exists.





      • It's not a lateral-thinking puzzle; the solution is not a trick.

      • If you arrive at a corner, simply follow the path.

      • You cannot suddenly turn around and walk the other way, but you may retrace your steps otherwise.

      • It's a puzzle of my own creation, and I already have the solution.

      • The missing line in the middle of the maze is intentional.







      logical-deduction no-computers mazes






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 10 hours ago









      ZanyGZanyG

      901319




      901319






















          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          19












          $begingroup$


          Since we must always turn 90 degrees, every odd-numbered step we take is always vertical and every even-numbered step is horizontal. Since the last step has to be horizontal, it means our total path has to be an even number of steps. In other words, once we've reached the red squares, we have made the same amount of vertical and horizontal steps.


          After each odd-numbered vertical step, we are an odd number of rows away from the starting point. After each even-numbered step, we are an even number of rows away. The same applies for horizontal steps.


          In the end, we have taken the same number of steps both horizontally and vertically (i.e. either both are even or both are odd). We are 4 columns away from the starting point, so we must have taken an even number of horizontal steps. However, we are 5 rows away from the starting point, so we must have taken an odd number of vertical steps. This is impossible, so we can conclude that there is no such path through the maze.




          Note though that this only works because this particular maze has no straight moves available (i.e. intersections where you can't turn but only go forward). For example, using the same rules, if you remove the vertical line directly below the 2x1 block...




          ...there actually is a solution (N, E, and then N-W until the end).







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            8












            $begingroup$

            Here is an answer that I think is slightly easier to understand:




            enter image description here

            I have marked all the intersections with a white or a black dot in the manner of a checkerboard. Whatever path you travel, the intersections you visit will alternate black and white. Since you also have to alternate your direction of travel at every intersection between east/west and north/south, it is easy to see that when you arrive at any black intersection, your next move is east/west, and at a white intersection your next move is north/south. The only way to reach the red block is west from a white intersection, which you will therefore never be able to do.


            To hammer the point home, from the restrictions above it follows that each edge can only be traversed in one direction. In the following picture I have marked each edge with the travel direction. As you can see, the edge to the red block has the arrow going in the wrong direction.

            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$





















              3












              $begingroup$

              The path through the maze is:




              non-existent.




              Some notes about this -




              The design of the maze is such that you'll basically be turning after following any line.

              The missing segment is largely irrelevant.

              Each step north, including the first, requires the next step to be east or west. Likewise for any step south.

              You have to travel a net distance north of 5 steps.

              After 1 step north + 1 step east/west, you're an ODD number of steps east or west of the starting position.

              After two steps north + 1 east/west, you'll be an EVEN number of steps east or west of the start.

              ...

              On a turn that leaves you 5 steps north, no matter how you get there, you'll be an even number of steps from the origin and about to have to turn east or west. The end state would require you to be an odd (3) number of steps west, so you will never be able to exit there.







              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$





















                -3












                $begingroup$

                It looks like this path may be successful:




                enter image description here

                Here's my reasoning:

                Step 0 (Green Room) - START

                Step 1 (N): I am now faced with a 3-way spoke, so I MUST turn 90°

                Step 2 (W): I have chosen to travel in the 90° West direction along the edge of the maze, I can therefore continue straight at the next intersection (Only 2 spokes)

                Step 3 (N): I am forced North by the corner of the maze and immediately am faced with another 3-way spoke.

                Step 4 (W): I have chosen to travel in the 90° West direction along the edge of the maze.

                Step 5 (N): I am forced North by the corner of the maze, but I see an intersection with 2 spokes, so I am able to continue straight on for two intersections until the next 3-spoke intersection.

                Step 6 (W): I chose to go West by 90° once more and find myself in the Red Room!

                Step 7 (Red Room) - END







                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Raisus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$









                • 2




                  $begingroup$
                  This violates the constraints of the puzzle: “each time you reach an intersection of three or more black paths (spokes), you must turn 90 degrees either direction”. You reach several such intersections without turning.
                  $endgroup$
                  – doppelgreener
                  6 hours ago












                • $begingroup$
                  Now that I re-read, I think I see what you misinterpreted: you have decided to not count the path you came from as a spoke in the intersection. (You reason that the 2nd intersection you reach has “only 2 spokes”. This also explains why at step 3 you describe that four-spoke intersection as a “3-way spoke”.) However we have no reason to discount it this way: the spoke you're coming from is another spoke in the intersection.
                  $endgroup$
                  – doppelgreener
                  2 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  Aah, I see. I didn't know that counted because in my mind I discounted it because of You cannot suddenly turn around and walk the other way, but you may retrace your steps otherwise.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Raisus
                  2 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  EDIT: There's no need to give it -ve response guys, that's just harsh!
                  $endgroup$
                  – Raisus
                  2 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  Invalid solutions are entirely eligible to get downvoted.
                  $endgroup$
                  – doppelgreener
                  2 hours ago



















                -4












                $begingroup$

                Solution



                This seems to work, don't know the math of odds evens up down but i ended up on the red.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Josh Lewis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  Sorry didn't turn at the first one but if you do it is actually easier
                  $endgroup$
                  – Josh Lewis
                  2 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  If you do turn at the first intersection (as you are supposed to), it won't be easier. It will be impossible, as the accepted answer shows. Are you sure you didn't go straight ahead at the last intersection?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Jaap Scherphuis
                  2 hours ago






                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  This makes an invalid move at the first intersection by not turning. Please update your answer to indicate a correct solution. If it is actually easier, it sounds like you already have a solution in mind: please post that.
                  $endgroup$
                  – doppelgreener
                  1 hour ago











                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                });
                });
                }, "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "559"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: false,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: null,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79951%2fthe-no-straight-maze%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                5 Answers
                5






                active

                oldest

                votes








                5 Answers
                5






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                19












                $begingroup$


                Since we must always turn 90 degrees, every odd-numbered step we take is always vertical and every even-numbered step is horizontal. Since the last step has to be horizontal, it means our total path has to be an even number of steps. In other words, once we've reached the red squares, we have made the same amount of vertical and horizontal steps.


                After each odd-numbered vertical step, we are an odd number of rows away from the starting point. After each even-numbered step, we are an even number of rows away. The same applies for horizontal steps.


                In the end, we have taken the same number of steps both horizontally and vertically (i.e. either both are even or both are odd). We are 4 columns away from the starting point, so we must have taken an even number of horizontal steps. However, we are 5 rows away from the starting point, so we must have taken an odd number of vertical steps. This is impossible, so we can conclude that there is no such path through the maze.




                Note though that this only works because this particular maze has no straight moves available (i.e. intersections where you can't turn but only go forward). For example, using the same rules, if you remove the vertical line directly below the 2x1 block...




                ...there actually is a solution (N, E, and then N-W until the end).







                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$


















                  19












                  $begingroup$


                  Since we must always turn 90 degrees, every odd-numbered step we take is always vertical and every even-numbered step is horizontal. Since the last step has to be horizontal, it means our total path has to be an even number of steps. In other words, once we've reached the red squares, we have made the same amount of vertical and horizontal steps.


                  After each odd-numbered vertical step, we are an odd number of rows away from the starting point. After each even-numbered step, we are an even number of rows away. The same applies for horizontal steps.


                  In the end, we have taken the same number of steps both horizontally and vertically (i.e. either both are even or both are odd). We are 4 columns away from the starting point, so we must have taken an even number of horizontal steps. However, we are 5 rows away from the starting point, so we must have taken an odd number of vertical steps. This is impossible, so we can conclude that there is no such path through the maze.




                  Note though that this only works because this particular maze has no straight moves available (i.e. intersections where you can't turn but only go forward). For example, using the same rules, if you remove the vertical line directly below the 2x1 block...




                  ...there actually is a solution (N, E, and then N-W until the end).







                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$
















                    19












                    19








                    19





                    $begingroup$


                    Since we must always turn 90 degrees, every odd-numbered step we take is always vertical and every even-numbered step is horizontal. Since the last step has to be horizontal, it means our total path has to be an even number of steps. In other words, once we've reached the red squares, we have made the same amount of vertical and horizontal steps.


                    After each odd-numbered vertical step, we are an odd number of rows away from the starting point. After each even-numbered step, we are an even number of rows away. The same applies for horizontal steps.


                    In the end, we have taken the same number of steps both horizontally and vertically (i.e. either both are even or both are odd). We are 4 columns away from the starting point, so we must have taken an even number of horizontal steps. However, we are 5 rows away from the starting point, so we must have taken an odd number of vertical steps. This is impossible, so we can conclude that there is no such path through the maze.




                    Note though that this only works because this particular maze has no straight moves available (i.e. intersections where you can't turn but only go forward). For example, using the same rules, if you remove the vertical line directly below the 2x1 block...




                    ...there actually is a solution (N, E, and then N-W until the end).







                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$




                    Since we must always turn 90 degrees, every odd-numbered step we take is always vertical and every even-numbered step is horizontal. Since the last step has to be horizontal, it means our total path has to be an even number of steps. In other words, once we've reached the red squares, we have made the same amount of vertical and horizontal steps.


                    After each odd-numbered vertical step, we are an odd number of rows away from the starting point. After each even-numbered step, we are an even number of rows away. The same applies for horizontal steps.


                    In the end, we have taken the same number of steps both horizontally and vertically (i.e. either both are even or both are odd). We are 4 columns away from the starting point, so we must have taken an even number of horizontal steps. However, we are 5 rows away from the starting point, so we must have taken an odd number of vertical steps. This is impossible, so we can conclude that there is no such path through the maze.




                    Note though that this only works because this particular maze has no straight moves available (i.e. intersections where you can't turn but only go forward). For example, using the same rules, if you remove the vertical line directly below the 2x1 block...




                    ...there actually is a solution (N, E, and then N-W until the end).








                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 3 mins ago

























                    answered 10 hours ago









                    jafejafe

                    21.2k459213




                    21.2k459213























                        8












                        $begingroup$

                        Here is an answer that I think is slightly easier to understand:




                        enter image description here

                        I have marked all the intersections with a white or a black dot in the manner of a checkerboard. Whatever path you travel, the intersections you visit will alternate black and white. Since you also have to alternate your direction of travel at every intersection between east/west and north/south, it is easy to see that when you arrive at any black intersection, your next move is east/west, and at a white intersection your next move is north/south. The only way to reach the red block is west from a white intersection, which you will therefore never be able to do.


                        To hammer the point home, from the restrictions above it follows that each edge can only be traversed in one direction. In the following picture I have marked each edge with the travel direction. As you can see, the edge to the red block has the arrow going in the wrong direction.

                        enter image description here







                        share|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$


















                          8












                          $begingroup$

                          Here is an answer that I think is slightly easier to understand:




                          enter image description here

                          I have marked all the intersections with a white or a black dot in the manner of a checkerboard. Whatever path you travel, the intersections you visit will alternate black and white. Since you also have to alternate your direction of travel at every intersection between east/west and north/south, it is easy to see that when you arrive at any black intersection, your next move is east/west, and at a white intersection your next move is north/south. The only way to reach the red block is west from a white intersection, which you will therefore never be able to do.


                          To hammer the point home, from the restrictions above it follows that each edge can only be traversed in one direction. In the following picture I have marked each edge with the travel direction. As you can see, the edge to the red block has the arrow going in the wrong direction.

                          enter image description here







                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$
















                            8












                            8








                            8





                            $begingroup$

                            Here is an answer that I think is slightly easier to understand:




                            enter image description here

                            I have marked all the intersections with a white or a black dot in the manner of a checkerboard. Whatever path you travel, the intersections you visit will alternate black and white. Since you also have to alternate your direction of travel at every intersection between east/west and north/south, it is easy to see that when you arrive at any black intersection, your next move is east/west, and at a white intersection your next move is north/south. The only way to reach the red block is west from a white intersection, which you will therefore never be able to do.


                            To hammer the point home, from the restrictions above it follows that each edge can only be traversed in one direction. In the following picture I have marked each edge with the travel direction. As you can see, the edge to the red block has the arrow going in the wrong direction.

                            enter image description here







                            share|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$



                            Here is an answer that I think is slightly easier to understand:




                            enter image description here

                            I have marked all the intersections with a white or a black dot in the manner of a checkerboard. Whatever path you travel, the intersections you visit will alternate black and white. Since you also have to alternate your direction of travel at every intersection between east/west and north/south, it is easy to see that when you arrive at any black intersection, your next move is east/west, and at a white intersection your next move is north/south. The only way to reach the red block is west from a white intersection, which you will therefore never be able to do.


                            To hammer the point home, from the restrictions above it follows that each edge can only be traversed in one direction. In the following picture I have marked each edge with the travel direction. As you can see, the edge to the red block has the arrow going in the wrong direction.

                            enter image description here








                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited 44 mins ago

























                            answered 1 hour ago









                            Jaap ScherphuisJaap Scherphuis

                            15.6k12669




                            15.6k12669























                                3












                                $begingroup$

                                The path through the maze is:




                                non-existent.




                                Some notes about this -




                                The design of the maze is such that you'll basically be turning after following any line.

                                The missing segment is largely irrelevant.

                                Each step north, including the first, requires the next step to be east or west. Likewise for any step south.

                                You have to travel a net distance north of 5 steps.

                                After 1 step north + 1 step east/west, you're an ODD number of steps east or west of the starting position.

                                After two steps north + 1 east/west, you'll be an EVEN number of steps east or west of the start.

                                ...

                                On a turn that leaves you 5 steps north, no matter how you get there, you'll be an even number of steps from the origin and about to have to turn east or west. The end state would require you to be an odd (3) number of steps west, so you will never be able to exit there.







                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$


















                                  3












                                  $begingroup$

                                  The path through the maze is:




                                  non-existent.




                                  Some notes about this -




                                  The design of the maze is such that you'll basically be turning after following any line.

                                  The missing segment is largely irrelevant.

                                  Each step north, including the first, requires the next step to be east or west. Likewise for any step south.

                                  You have to travel a net distance north of 5 steps.

                                  After 1 step north + 1 step east/west, you're an ODD number of steps east or west of the starting position.

                                  After two steps north + 1 east/west, you'll be an EVEN number of steps east or west of the start.

                                  ...

                                  On a turn that leaves you 5 steps north, no matter how you get there, you'll be an even number of steps from the origin and about to have to turn east or west. The end state would require you to be an odd (3) number of steps west, so you will never be able to exit there.







                                  share|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$
















                                    3












                                    3








                                    3





                                    $begingroup$

                                    The path through the maze is:




                                    non-existent.




                                    Some notes about this -




                                    The design of the maze is such that you'll basically be turning after following any line.

                                    The missing segment is largely irrelevant.

                                    Each step north, including the first, requires the next step to be east or west. Likewise for any step south.

                                    You have to travel a net distance north of 5 steps.

                                    After 1 step north + 1 step east/west, you're an ODD number of steps east or west of the starting position.

                                    After two steps north + 1 east/west, you'll be an EVEN number of steps east or west of the start.

                                    ...

                                    On a turn that leaves you 5 steps north, no matter how you get there, you'll be an even number of steps from the origin and about to have to turn east or west. The end state would require you to be an odd (3) number of steps west, so you will never be able to exit there.







                                    share|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    The path through the maze is:




                                    non-existent.




                                    Some notes about this -




                                    The design of the maze is such that you'll basically be turning after following any line.

                                    The missing segment is largely irrelevant.

                                    Each step north, including the first, requires the next step to be east or west. Likewise for any step south.

                                    You have to travel a net distance north of 5 steps.

                                    After 1 step north + 1 step east/west, you're an ODD number of steps east or west of the starting position.

                                    After two steps north + 1 east/west, you'll be an EVEN number of steps east or west of the start.

                                    ...

                                    On a turn that leaves you 5 steps north, no matter how you get there, you'll be an even number of steps from the origin and about to have to turn east or west. The end state would require you to be an odd (3) number of steps west, so you will never be able to exit there.








                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered 10 hours ago









                                    RubioRubio

                                    28.9k565178




                                    28.9k565178























                                        -3












                                        $begingroup$

                                        It looks like this path may be successful:




                                        enter image description here

                                        Here's my reasoning:

                                        Step 0 (Green Room) - START

                                        Step 1 (N): I am now faced with a 3-way spoke, so I MUST turn 90°

                                        Step 2 (W): I have chosen to travel in the 90° West direction along the edge of the maze, I can therefore continue straight at the next intersection (Only 2 spokes)

                                        Step 3 (N): I am forced North by the corner of the maze and immediately am faced with another 3-way spoke.

                                        Step 4 (W): I have chosen to travel in the 90° West direction along the edge of the maze.

                                        Step 5 (N): I am forced North by the corner of the maze, but I see an intersection with 2 spokes, so I am able to continue straight on for two intersections until the next 3-spoke intersection.

                                        Step 6 (W): I chose to go West by 90° once more and find myself in the Red Room!

                                        Step 7 (Red Room) - END







                                        share|improve this answer








                                        New contributor




                                        Raisus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                        $endgroup$









                                        • 2




                                          $begingroup$
                                          This violates the constraints of the puzzle: “each time you reach an intersection of three or more black paths (spokes), you must turn 90 degrees either direction”. You reach several such intersections without turning.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – doppelgreener
                                          6 hours ago












                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Now that I re-read, I think I see what you misinterpreted: you have decided to not count the path you came from as a spoke in the intersection. (You reason that the 2nd intersection you reach has “only 2 spokes”. This also explains why at step 3 you describe that four-spoke intersection as a “3-way spoke”.) However we have no reason to discount it this way: the spoke you're coming from is another spoke in the intersection.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – doppelgreener
                                          2 hours ago










                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Aah, I see. I didn't know that counted because in my mind I discounted it because of You cannot suddenly turn around and walk the other way, but you may retrace your steps otherwise.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Raisus
                                          2 hours ago










                                        • $begingroup$
                                          EDIT: There's no need to give it -ve response guys, that's just harsh!
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Raisus
                                          2 hours ago










                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Invalid solutions are entirely eligible to get downvoted.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – doppelgreener
                                          2 hours ago
















                                        -3












                                        $begingroup$

                                        It looks like this path may be successful:




                                        enter image description here

                                        Here's my reasoning:

                                        Step 0 (Green Room) - START

                                        Step 1 (N): I am now faced with a 3-way spoke, so I MUST turn 90°

                                        Step 2 (W): I have chosen to travel in the 90° West direction along the edge of the maze, I can therefore continue straight at the next intersection (Only 2 spokes)

                                        Step 3 (N): I am forced North by the corner of the maze and immediately am faced with another 3-way spoke.

                                        Step 4 (W): I have chosen to travel in the 90° West direction along the edge of the maze.

                                        Step 5 (N): I am forced North by the corner of the maze, but I see an intersection with 2 spokes, so I am able to continue straight on for two intersections until the next 3-spoke intersection.

                                        Step 6 (W): I chose to go West by 90° once more and find myself in the Red Room!

                                        Step 7 (Red Room) - END







                                        share|improve this answer








                                        New contributor




                                        Raisus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                        $endgroup$









                                        • 2




                                          $begingroup$
                                          This violates the constraints of the puzzle: “each time you reach an intersection of three or more black paths (spokes), you must turn 90 degrees either direction”. You reach several such intersections without turning.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – doppelgreener
                                          6 hours ago












                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Now that I re-read, I think I see what you misinterpreted: you have decided to not count the path you came from as a spoke in the intersection. (You reason that the 2nd intersection you reach has “only 2 spokes”. This also explains why at step 3 you describe that four-spoke intersection as a “3-way spoke”.) However we have no reason to discount it this way: the spoke you're coming from is another spoke in the intersection.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – doppelgreener
                                          2 hours ago










                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Aah, I see. I didn't know that counted because in my mind I discounted it because of You cannot suddenly turn around and walk the other way, but you may retrace your steps otherwise.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Raisus
                                          2 hours ago










                                        • $begingroup$
                                          EDIT: There's no need to give it -ve response guys, that's just harsh!
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Raisus
                                          2 hours ago










                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Invalid solutions are entirely eligible to get downvoted.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – doppelgreener
                                          2 hours ago














                                        -3












                                        -3








                                        -3





                                        $begingroup$

                                        It looks like this path may be successful:




                                        enter image description here

                                        Here's my reasoning:

                                        Step 0 (Green Room) - START

                                        Step 1 (N): I am now faced with a 3-way spoke, so I MUST turn 90°

                                        Step 2 (W): I have chosen to travel in the 90° West direction along the edge of the maze, I can therefore continue straight at the next intersection (Only 2 spokes)

                                        Step 3 (N): I am forced North by the corner of the maze and immediately am faced with another 3-way spoke.

                                        Step 4 (W): I have chosen to travel in the 90° West direction along the edge of the maze.

                                        Step 5 (N): I am forced North by the corner of the maze, but I see an intersection with 2 spokes, so I am able to continue straight on for two intersections until the next 3-spoke intersection.

                                        Step 6 (W): I chose to go West by 90° once more and find myself in the Red Room!

                                        Step 7 (Red Room) - END







                                        share|improve this answer








                                        New contributor




                                        Raisus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                        $endgroup$



                                        It looks like this path may be successful:




                                        enter image description here

                                        Here's my reasoning:

                                        Step 0 (Green Room) - START

                                        Step 1 (N): I am now faced with a 3-way spoke, so I MUST turn 90°

                                        Step 2 (W): I have chosen to travel in the 90° West direction along the edge of the maze, I can therefore continue straight at the next intersection (Only 2 spokes)

                                        Step 3 (N): I am forced North by the corner of the maze and immediately am faced with another 3-way spoke.

                                        Step 4 (W): I have chosen to travel in the 90° West direction along the edge of the maze.

                                        Step 5 (N): I am forced North by the corner of the maze, but I see an intersection with 2 spokes, so I am able to continue straight on for two intersections until the next 3-spoke intersection.

                                        Step 6 (W): I chose to go West by 90° once more and find myself in the Red Room!

                                        Step 7 (Red Room) - END








                                        share|improve this answer








                                        New contributor




                                        Raisus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer






                                        New contributor




                                        Raisus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                        answered 6 hours ago









                                        RaisusRaisus

                                        952




                                        952




                                        New contributor




                                        Raisus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                        New contributor





                                        Raisus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                        Raisus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.








                                        • 2




                                          $begingroup$
                                          This violates the constraints of the puzzle: “each time you reach an intersection of three or more black paths (spokes), you must turn 90 degrees either direction”. You reach several such intersections without turning.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – doppelgreener
                                          6 hours ago












                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Now that I re-read, I think I see what you misinterpreted: you have decided to not count the path you came from as a spoke in the intersection. (You reason that the 2nd intersection you reach has “only 2 spokes”. This also explains why at step 3 you describe that four-spoke intersection as a “3-way spoke”.) However we have no reason to discount it this way: the spoke you're coming from is another spoke in the intersection.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – doppelgreener
                                          2 hours ago










                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Aah, I see. I didn't know that counted because in my mind I discounted it because of You cannot suddenly turn around and walk the other way, but you may retrace your steps otherwise.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Raisus
                                          2 hours ago










                                        • $begingroup$
                                          EDIT: There's no need to give it -ve response guys, that's just harsh!
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Raisus
                                          2 hours ago










                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Invalid solutions are entirely eligible to get downvoted.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – doppelgreener
                                          2 hours ago














                                        • 2




                                          $begingroup$
                                          This violates the constraints of the puzzle: “each time you reach an intersection of three or more black paths (spokes), you must turn 90 degrees either direction”. You reach several such intersections without turning.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – doppelgreener
                                          6 hours ago












                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Now that I re-read, I think I see what you misinterpreted: you have decided to not count the path you came from as a spoke in the intersection. (You reason that the 2nd intersection you reach has “only 2 spokes”. This also explains why at step 3 you describe that four-spoke intersection as a “3-way spoke”.) However we have no reason to discount it this way: the spoke you're coming from is another spoke in the intersection.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – doppelgreener
                                          2 hours ago










                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Aah, I see. I didn't know that counted because in my mind I discounted it because of You cannot suddenly turn around and walk the other way, but you may retrace your steps otherwise.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Raisus
                                          2 hours ago










                                        • $begingroup$
                                          EDIT: There's no need to give it -ve response guys, that's just harsh!
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Raisus
                                          2 hours ago










                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Invalid solutions are entirely eligible to get downvoted.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – doppelgreener
                                          2 hours ago








                                        2




                                        2




                                        $begingroup$
                                        This violates the constraints of the puzzle: “each time you reach an intersection of three or more black paths (spokes), you must turn 90 degrees either direction”. You reach several such intersections without turning.
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – doppelgreener
                                        6 hours ago






                                        $begingroup$
                                        This violates the constraints of the puzzle: “each time you reach an intersection of three or more black paths (spokes), you must turn 90 degrees either direction”. You reach several such intersections without turning.
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – doppelgreener
                                        6 hours ago














                                        $begingroup$
                                        Now that I re-read, I think I see what you misinterpreted: you have decided to not count the path you came from as a spoke in the intersection. (You reason that the 2nd intersection you reach has “only 2 spokes”. This also explains why at step 3 you describe that four-spoke intersection as a “3-way spoke”.) However we have no reason to discount it this way: the spoke you're coming from is another spoke in the intersection.
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – doppelgreener
                                        2 hours ago




                                        $begingroup$
                                        Now that I re-read, I think I see what you misinterpreted: you have decided to not count the path you came from as a spoke in the intersection. (You reason that the 2nd intersection you reach has “only 2 spokes”. This also explains why at step 3 you describe that four-spoke intersection as a “3-way spoke”.) However we have no reason to discount it this way: the spoke you're coming from is another spoke in the intersection.
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – doppelgreener
                                        2 hours ago












                                        $begingroup$
                                        Aah, I see. I didn't know that counted because in my mind I discounted it because of You cannot suddenly turn around and walk the other way, but you may retrace your steps otherwise.
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – Raisus
                                        2 hours ago




                                        $begingroup$
                                        Aah, I see. I didn't know that counted because in my mind I discounted it because of You cannot suddenly turn around and walk the other way, but you may retrace your steps otherwise.
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – Raisus
                                        2 hours ago












                                        $begingroup$
                                        EDIT: There's no need to give it -ve response guys, that's just harsh!
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – Raisus
                                        2 hours ago




                                        $begingroup$
                                        EDIT: There's no need to give it -ve response guys, that's just harsh!
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – Raisus
                                        2 hours ago












                                        $begingroup$
                                        Invalid solutions are entirely eligible to get downvoted.
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – doppelgreener
                                        2 hours ago




                                        $begingroup$
                                        Invalid solutions are entirely eligible to get downvoted.
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – doppelgreener
                                        2 hours ago











                                        -4












                                        $begingroup$

                                        Solution



                                        This seems to work, don't know the math of odds evens up down but i ended up on the red.






                                        share|improve this answer








                                        New contributor




                                        Josh Lewis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                        $endgroup$













                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Sorry didn't turn at the first one but if you do it is actually easier
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Josh Lewis
                                          2 hours ago










                                        • $begingroup$
                                          If you do turn at the first intersection (as you are supposed to), it won't be easier. It will be impossible, as the accepted answer shows. Are you sure you didn't go straight ahead at the last intersection?
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Jaap Scherphuis
                                          2 hours ago






                                        • 1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          This makes an invalid move at the first intersection by not turning. Please update your answer to indicate a correct solution. If it is actually easier, it sounds like you already have a solution in mind: please post that.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – doppelgreener
                                          1 hour ago
















                                        -4












                                        $begingroup$

                                        Solution



                                        This seems to work, don't know the math of odds evens up down but i ended up on the red.






                                        share|improve this answer








                                        New contributor




                                        Josh Lewis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                        $endgroup$













                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Sorry didn't turn at the first one but if you do it is actually easier
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Josh Lewis
                                          2 hours ago










                                        • $begingroup$
                                          If you do turn at the first intersection (as you are supposed to), it won't be easier. It will be impossible, as the accepted answer shows. Are you sure you didn't go straight ahead at the last intersection?
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Jaap Scherphuis
                                          2 hours ago






                                        • 1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          This makes an invalid move at the first intersection by not turning. Please update your answer to indicate a correct solution. If it is actually easier, it sounds like you already have a solution in mind: please post that.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – doppelgreener
                                          1 hour ago














                                        -4












                                        -4








                                        -4





                                        $begingroup$

                                        Solution



                                        This seems to work, don't know the math of odds evens up down but i ended up on the red.






                                        share|improve this answer








                                        New contributor




                                        Josh Lewis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                        $endgroup$



                                        Solution



                                        This seems to work, don't know the math of odds evens up down but i ended up on the red.







                                        share|improve this answer








                                        New contributor




                                        Josh Lewis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer






                                        New contributor




                                        Josh Lewis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                        answered 2 hours ago









                                        Josh LewisJosh Lewis

                                        1




                                        1




                                        New contributor




                                        Josh Lewis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                        New contributor





                                        Josh Lewis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                        Josh Lewis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.












                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Sorry didn't turn at the first one but if you do it is actually easier
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Josh Lewis
                                          2 hours ago










                                        • $begingroup$
                                          If you do turn at the first intersection (as you are supposed to), it won't be easier. It will be impossible, as the accepted answer shows. Are you sure you didn't go straight ahead at the last intersection?
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Jaap Scherphuis
                                          2 hours ago






                                        • 1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          This makes an invalid move at the first intersection by not turning. Please update your answer to indicate a correct solution. If it is actually easier, it sounds like you already have a solution in mind: please post that.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – doppelgreener
                                          1 hour ago


















                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Sorry didn't turn at the first one but if you do it is actually easier
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Josh Lewis
                                          2 hours ago










                                        • $begingroup$
                                          If you do turn at the first intersection (as you are supposed to), it won't be easier. It will be impossible, as the accepted answer shows. Are you sure you didn't go straight ahead at the last intersection?
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Jaap Scherphuis
                                          2 hours ago






                                        • 1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          This makes an invalid move at the first intersection by not turning. Please update your answer to indicate a correct solution. If it is actually easier, it sounds like you already have a solution in mind: please post that.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – doppelgreener
                                          1 hour ago
















                                        $begingroup$
                                        Sorry didn't turn at the first one but if you do it is actually easier
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – Josh Lewis
                                        2 hours ago




                                        $begingroup$
                                        Sorry didn't turn at the first one but if you do it is actually easier
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – Josh Lewis
                                        2 hours ago












                                        $begingroup$
                                        If you do turn at the first intersection (as you are supposed to), it won't be easier. It will be impossible, as the accepted answer shows. Are you sure you didn't go straight ahead at the last intersection?
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – Jaap Scherphuis
                                        2 hours ago




                                        $begingroup$
                                        If you do turn at the first intersection (as you are supposed to), it won't be easier. It will be impossible, as the accepted answer shows. Are you sure you didn't go straight ahead at the last intersection?
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – Jaap Scherphuis
                                        2 hours ago




                                        1




                                        1




                                        $begingroup$
                                        This makes an invalid move at the first intersection by not turning. Please update your answer to indicate a correct solution. If it is actually easier, it sounds like you already have a solution in mind: please post that.
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – doppelgreener
                                        1 hour ago




                                        $begingroup$
                                        This makes an invalid move at the first intersection by not turning. Please update your answer to indicate a correct solution. If it is actually easier, it sounds like you already have a solution in mind: please post that.
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – doppelgreener
                                        1 hour ago


















                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79951%2fthe-no-straight-maze%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...

                                        Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Mirandela Referências Menu de...

                                        looking for continuous Screen Capture for retroactivly reproducing errors, timeback machineRolling desktop...