Fix overscan in Linux with Intel graphics Vizio HDTV Announcing the arrival of Valued...
Why is Nikon 1.4g better when Nikon 1.8g is sharper?
Putting class ranking in CV, but against dept guidelines
Did Deadpool rescue all of the X-Force?
Effects on objects due to a brief relocation of massive amounts of mass
How to write this math term? with cases it isn't working
An adverb for when you're not exaggerating
What is this clumpy 20-30cm high yellow-flowered plant?
How fail-safe is nr as stop bytes?
Disembodied hand growing fangs
Performance gap between vector<bool> and array
Illegal assignment from sObject to Id
Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?
What is the difference between globalisation and imperialism?
How does the math work when buying airline miles?
Can the Great Weapon Master feat's damage bonus and accuracy penalty apply to attacks from the Spiritual Weapon spell?
Why should I vote and accept answers?
A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way
Can anything be seen from the center of the Boötes void? How dark would it be?
Why does it sometimes sound good to play a grace note as a lead in to a note in a melody?
Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?
What is a fractional matching?
Hangman Game with C++
Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?
ArcGIS Pro Python arcpy.CreatePersonalGDB_management
Fix overscan in Linux with Intel graphics Vizio HDTV
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to eliminate overscan on Ubuntu HTPCLinux kernel does not boot when Intel integrated graphics is enabledDell Inspiron 1764 Maximum external monitor resolutionIntel HD Graphics 3000: Screen resolution greater than panel's?Disable Intel HD Graphics(Baytrail) OverscanNeed graphics/display drivers for Intel S1200v3RPS board for Ubuntu 12.x, 14.xCorrect Intel graphics driver for the i7-3632QM?Disable Overscan AMD Radeon 7600M Windows 10Finetuning Overscan/Underscan on ATI RadeonInstalling Intel Graphics Driver on Linux Mint
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I am connecting my server to my HDTV so that I can conveniently display it there. My VIZIO HDTV cuts off all 4 edges. I already realize it is not optimal to be running a GUI on a server; this server will not have much external traffic so I prefer it for convenience.
I have already spent countless hours searching for a fix, but all I could find required an ATI or NVIDIA graphics card, or didn’t work. In Windows, the Intel driver has a setting for underscan, though it seems only to be available by a glitch.
Here’s my specs:
- Ubuntu Linux (Quantal 12.10) (Likely to switch to Arch)
- This is a home server computer, with KDE for managing(for now, at least)
- Graphics: Intel HD Graphics 4000 from Ivy Bridge
- Motherboard: ASRock Z77 Extreme4
- CPU: Intel Core i5-3450
My monitors:
- Dell LCD monitor
- Vizio VX37L_HDTV10A 37" on HDMI input
I have tried all of the following from both HDMI⇨HDMI and DVI⇨HDMI cables connected to the ports on my motherboard:
- Setting properties in xrandr
- Making sure drivers are all up to date
- Trying several different modes
The TV was “cheap”; max resolution 1080i. I am able to get a 1920x1080 modeline, in both GNU/Linux and Windows, without difficulty. There is no setting in the menu to fix the overscan (I have tried all of them, I realize it’s not always called overscan). I have been in the service menu for the TV, which still does not contain an option to fix it. No aspect ratio settings, etc. The TV has a VGA connector but I am unsure if it would fix it, as I don’t have a VGA cable long enough, and am not sure it would get me the 1920x1080 resolution which I want. Using another resolution does not fix the problem.
I tried custom modelines with the dimensions of my screen’s viewable area, but it wouldn’t let me use them.
Ubuntu apparently doesn’t automatically generate an xorg.conf
file for use. I read somewhere that modifying it may help solve it. I tried X -configure
several times(with reboots, etc.) but it consistently gave the following error messages:
In log file:
…
(WW) Falling back to old probe method for vesa
Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices.
Configuration failed.
In output:
…
(++) Using config file: "/root/xorg.conf.new"
(==) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d"
Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices.
Configuration failed.
Server terminated with error (2).
Closing log file.
Tried using 'overscan' prop in xrandr:
root@xxx:/home/xxx# xrandr --output HDMI1 --set overscan off
X Error of failed request: BadName (named color or font does not exist)
Major opcode of failed request: 140 (RANDR)
Minor opcode of failed request: 11 (RRQueryOutputProperty)
Serial number of failed request: 42
Current serial number in output stream: 42
'overscan on', 'underscan off', 'underscan on' were all also tried.
Originally tried with Ubuntu 12.04, but failed and so updated to 12.10 when it was released. All software is up to date.
Update: I just bought a new TV and the new one has plenty of options for fixing this, so for me it's resolved. Still interested to know of a solution for this absurd problem that shouldn't be though.
linux xorg tv intel-graphics overscan
add a comment |
I am connecting my server to my HDTV so that I can conveniently display it there. My VIZIO HDTV cuts off all 4 edges. I already realize it is not optimal to be running a GUI on a server; this server will not have much external traffic so I prefer it for convenience.
I have already spent countless hours searching for a fix, but all I could find required an ATI or NVIDIA graphics card, or didn’t work. In Windows, the Intel driver has a setting for underscan, though it seems only to be available by a glitch.
Here’s my specs:
- Ubuntu Linux (Quantal 12.10) (Likely to switch to Arch)
- This is a home server computer, with KDE for managing(for now, at least)
- Graphics: Intel HD Graphics 4000 from Ivy Bridge
- Motherboard: ASRock Z77 Extreme4
- CPU: Intel Core i5-3450
My monitors:
- Dell LCD monitor
- Vizio VX37L_HDTV10A 37" on HDMI input
I have tried all of the following from both HDMI⇨HDMI and DVI⇨HDMI cables connected to the ports on my motherboard:
- Setting properties in xrandr
- Making sure drivers are all up to date
- Trying several different modes
The TV was “cheap”; max resolution 1080i. I am able to get a 1920x1080 modeline, in both GNU/Linux and Windows, without difficulty. There is no setting in the menu to fix the overscan (I have tried all of them, I realize it’s not always called overscan). I have been in the service menu for the TV, which still does not contain an option to fix it. No aspect ratio settings, etc. The TV has a VGA connector but I am unsure if it would fix it, as I don’t have a VGA cable long enough, and am not sure it would get me the 1920x1080 resolution which I want. Using another resolution does not fix the problem.
I tried custom modelines with the dimensions of my screen’s viewable area, but it wouldn’t let me use them.
Ubuntu apparently doesn’t automatically generate an xorg.conf
file for use. I read somewhere that modifying it may help solve it. I tried X -configure
several times(with reboots, etc.) but it consistently gave the following error messages:
In log file:
…
(WW) Falling back to old probe method for vesa
Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices.
Configuration failed.
In output:
…
(++) Using config file: "/root/xorg.conf.new"
(==) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d"
Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices.
Configuration failed.
Server terminated with error (2).
Closing log file.
Tried using 'overscan' prop in xrandr:
root@xxx:/home/xxx# xrandr --output HDMI1 --set overscan off
X Error of failed request: BadName (named color or font does not exist)
Major opcode of failed request: 140 (RANDR)
Minor opcode of failed request: 11 (RRQueryOutputProperty)
Serial number of failed request: 42
Current serial number in output stream: 42
'overscan on', 'underscan off', 'underscan on' were all also tried.
Originally tried with Ubuntu 12.04, but failed and so updated to 12.10 when it was released. All software is up to date.
Update: I just bought a new TV and the new one has plenty of options for fixing this, so for me it's resolved. Still interested to know of a solution for this absurd problem that shouldn't be though.
linux xorg tv intel-graphics overscan
It looks like Ironlake and above Intel graphics cards have an overscan compensation (accessed on Linux byintel_panel_fitter
) - so if you have a TV new enough to allow disabling overscan, or a processor new enough to compensate for a poorly designed TV, you're good. (But if you're like me and have an obsolete processor AND a problematic TV, you're out of luck...)
– JamesTheAwesomeDude
Feb 14 '15 at 0:17
add a comment |
I am connecting my server to my HDTV so that I can conveniently display it there. My VIZIO HDTV cuts off all 4 edges. I already realize it is not optimal to be running a GUI on a server; this server will not have much external traffic so I prefer it for convenience.
I have already spent countless hours searching for a fix, but all I could find required an ATI or NVIDIA graphics card, or didn’t work. In Windows, the Intel driver has a setting for underscan, though it seems only to be available by a glitch.
Here’s my specs:
- Ubuntu Linux (Quantal 12.10) (Likely to switch to Arch)
- This is a home server computer, with KDE for managing(for now, at least)
- Graphics: Intel HD Graphics 4000 from Ivy Bridge
- Motherboard: ASRock Z77 Extreme4
- CPU: Intel Core i5-3450
My monitors:
- Dell LCD monitor
- Vizio VX37L_HDTV10A 37" on HDMI input
I have tried all of the following from both HDMI⇨HDMI and DVI⇨HDMI cables connected to the ports on my motherboard:
- Setting properties in xrandr
- Making sure drivers are all up to date
- Trying several different modes
The TV was “cheap”; max resolution 1080i. I am able to get a 1920x1080 modeline, in both GNU/Linux and Windows, without difficulty. There is no setting in the menu to fix the overscan (I have tried all of them, I realize it’s not always called overscan). I have been in the service menu for the TV, which still does not contain an option to fix it. No aspect ratio settings, etc. The TV has a VGA connector but I am unsure if it would fix it, as I don’t have a VGA cable long enough, and am not sure it would get me the 1920x1080 resolution which I want. Using another resolution does not fix the problem.
I tried custom modelines with the dimensions of my screen’s viewable area, but it wouldn’t let me use them.
Ubuntu apparently doesn’t automatically generate an xorg.conf
file for use. I read somewhere that modifying it may help solve it. I tried X -configure
several times(with reboots, etc.) but it consistently gave the following error messages:
In log file:
…
(WW) Falling back to old probe method for vesa
Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices.
Configuration failed.
In output:
…
(++) Using config file: "/root/xorg.conf.new"
(==) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d"
Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices.
Configuration failed.
Server terminated with error (2).
Closing log file.
Tried using 'overscan' prop in xrandr:
root@xxx:/home/xxx# xrandr --output HDMI1 --set overscan off
X Error of failed request: BadName (named color or font does not exist)
Major opcode of failed request: 140 (RANDR)
Minor opcode of failed request: 11 (RRQueryOutputProperty)
Serial number of failed request: 42
Current serial number in output stream: 42
'overscan on', 'underscan off', 'underscan on' were all also tried.
Originally tried with Ubuntu 12.04, but failed and so updated to 12.10 when it was released. All software is up to date.
Update: I just bought a new TV and the new one has plenty of options for fixing this, so for me it's resolved. Still interested to know of a solution for this absurd problem that shouldn't be though.
linux xorg tv intel-graphics overscan
I am connecting my server to my HDTV so that I can conveniently display it there. My VIZIO HDTV cuts off all 4 edges. I already realize it is not optimal to be running a GUI on a server; this server will not have much external traffic so I prefer it for convenience.
I have already spent countless hours searching for a fix, but all I could find required an ATI or NVIDIA graphics card, or didn’t work. In Windows, the Intel driver has a setting for underscan, though it seems only to be available by a glitch.
Here’s my specs:
- Ubuntu Linux (Quantal 12.10) (Likely to switch to Arch)
- This is a home server computer, with KDE for managing(for now, at least)
- Graphics: Intel HD Graphics 4000 from Ivy Bridge
- Motherboard: ASRock Z77 Extreme4
- CPU: Intel Core i5-3450
My monitors:
- Dell LCD monitor
- Vizio VX37L_HDTV10A 37" on HDMI input
I have tried all of the following from both HDMI⇨HDMI and DVI⇨HDMI cables connected to the ports on my motherboard:
- Setting properties in xrandr
- Making sure drivers are all up to date
- Trying several different modes
The TV was “cheap”; max resolution 1080i. I am able to get a 1920x1080 modeline, in both GNU/Linux and Windows, without difficulty. There is no setting in the menu to fix the overscan (I have tried all of them, I realize it’s not always called overscan). I have been in the service menu for the TV, which still does not contain an option to fix it. No aspect ratio settings, etc. The TV has a VGA connector but I am unsure if it would fix it, as I don’t have a VGA cable long enough, and am not sure it would get me the 1920x1080 resolution which I want. Using another resolution does not fix the problem.
I tried custom modelines with the dimensions of my screen’s viewable area, but it wouldn’t let me use them.
Ubuntu apparently doesn’t automatically generate an xorg.conf
file for use. I read somewhere that modifying it may help solve it. I tried X -configure
several times(with reboots, etc.) but it consistently gave the following error messages:
In log file:
…
(WW) Falling back to old probe method for vesa
Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices.
Configuration failed.
In output:
…
(++) Using config file: "/root/xorg.conf.new"
(==) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d"
Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices.
Configuration failed.
Server terminated with error (2).
Closing log file.
Tried using 'overscan' prop in xrandr:
root@xxx:/home/xxx# xrandr --output HDMI1 --set overscan off
X Error of failed request: BadName (named color or font does not exist)
Major opcode of failed request: 140 (RANDR)
Minor opcode of failed request: 11 (RRQueryOutputProperty)
Serial number of failed request: 42
Current serial number in output stream: 42
'overscan on', 'underscan off', 'underscan on' were all also tried.
Originally tried with Ubuntu 12.04, but failed and so updated to 12.10 when it was released. All software is up to date.
Update: I just bought a new TV and the new one has plenty of options for fixing this, so for me it's resolved. Still interested to know of a solution for this absurd problem that shouldn't be though.
linux xorg tv intel-graphics overscan
linux xorg tv intel-graphics overscan
edited Dec 28 '12 at 21:14
Max Burns
asked Oct 28 '12 at 23:39
Max BurnsMax Burns
2951212
2951212
It looks like Ironlake and above Intel graphics cards have an overscan compensation (accessed on Linux byintel_panel_fitter
) - so if you have a TV new enough to allow disabling overscan, or a processor new enough to compensate for a poorly designed TV, you're good. (But if you're like me and have an obsolete processor AND a problematic TV, you're out of luck...)
– JamesTheAwesomeDude
Feb 14 '15 at 0:17
add a comment |
It looks like Ironlake and above Intel graphics cards have an overscan compensation (accessed on Linux byintel_panel_fitter
) - so if you have a TV new enough to allow disabling overscan, or a processor new enough to compensate for a poorly designed TV, you're good. (But if you're like me and have an obsolete processor AND a problematic TV, you're out of luck...)
– JamesTheAwesomeDude
Feb 14 '15 at 0:17
It looks like Ironlake and above Intel graphics cards have an overscan compensation (accessed on Linux by
intel_panel_fitter
) - so if you have a TV new enough to allow disabling overscan, or a processor new enough to compensate for a poorly designed TV, you're good. (But if you're like me and have an obsolete processor AND a problematic TV, you're out of luck...)– JamesTheAwesomeDude
Feb 14 '15 at 0:17
It looks like Ironlake and above Intel graphics cards have an overscan compensation (accessed on Linux by
intel_panel_fitter
) - so if you have a TV new enough to allow disabling overscan, or a processor new enough to compensate for a poorly designed TV, you're good. (But if you're like me and have an obsolete processor AND a problematic TV, you're out of luck...)– JamesTheAwesomeDude
Feb 14 '15 at 0:17
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
I have the same problem, this trick works for me on an Intel HD 3000 with a cheap 720p Akira TV:
xrandr --output HDMI1 --set audio force-dvi --mode 1280x720
this works but break the audio output for me
– Francesco
Mar 19 '17 at 14:40
Spent 20 minutes searching! This worked for me
– michael
Sep 22 '17 at 19:36
add a comment |
First, install latest Intel driver.
Add the following to /etc/rc.local
:
intel_panel_fitter -p A -x 1200 -y 670
and in the users .xprofile
:
xrandr --output HDMI1 --transform 1.0,0,+1,0,1.0,+2,0,0,1
Now the picture goes through DVI -> HDMIAdapter -> Samsung TV.
Xrandrs transform option alone did not help.
add a comment |
It may be that your Intel graphics do not support the xrandr underscan - you can check this by trying:
xrandr --prop
...this should list the properties available, and report the status of things like underscan, if it exists.
Our Intel Celeron J1900 (SoC with graphics on chip) appears to be using the i915 kernel module and does not have many features on offer at all, according to xrandr.
Not underscan, anyway. (sigh)
About to try 'xvidtune', but it comes with dire warnings of potential hardware damage...
Hope you find a solution!
xvidtune is not the answer, it seems. Have excercised it pretty thoroughly but to no avail. Ditto the xrandr --transform option. It may be that I've missed something, of course...
– Flymo
Jun 25 '14 at 12:15
add a comment |
I've been having the exact same issue with my laptop with an Intel 4000 / NVidia GTX 680M setup. Due to this issue, I was booting to my windows drive just for watching movies and whatnot. Recently installed updates on my Windows side, and POOF!, couldn't adjust it there either...
I'm glad I fixed it at last: There was one particular setting on my TV that needed to be changed from it's default. It was buried pretty well in the menus and didn't know it was there until I was reading through my TV's manual to see if I could find more information to tune my graphics with.
There was an option in there that trimmed my display down to a perfect fit, and now everything looks perfect for me all around.
Just wanted to mention it in case you haven't gone through your TV settings thoroughly (I thought I had... THREE TIMES.) I feel really dumb for having LEARNED something from the manual for my TV, but I'm happy it's at least working properly now.
add a comment |
If you google overscan Vizio, you will see quite a few articles with help on this. I have an E260MV. The solution is in the TV settings.
On my model to disable overscan:
Menu - Wide - Normal
;-)
add a comment |
FWIW, I have a 2008-vintage Vizio 32" plasma VP322 (VP322HDTV10A), which did not have any usable option in the TV menus, did not expose an overscan
property in xrandr --props
, and only advertised a few modes in its EDID (either low-resolution 4:3 modes such as 800x600, or 16:9 higher-res modes with either 720 or 1080 lines).
After a bit of experimentation it turns out that the Vizio unconditionally overscanned when it saw one of the 720 or 1080 modes (labeling the output as e.g. 720p
or 1080p
), and it would NOT overscan for other modes (which it labeled as e.g .PC W x H
), moreover it would easily recognize most modes (including e.g. 1280x768 and eve funky ones like 1200x700), as PC
no-overscan modes, even if they were not advertised in its EDID.
So the following reuse of a mode that my laptop's LCD panel output already had (you can also define your own custom mode using cvt
and xrandr --newmode
) did the trick nicely, no overscan:
xrandr --addmode HDMI1 1366x768
xrandr --output HDMI1 --setmode 1366x768
Other people elsewhere had luck with different TVs by creating modes with non-standard pixel clocks (scan frequencies), but the principle was the same: circumvent "automatic" overscan decision logic in the TV that is not otherwise exposed via HDMI or TV menus.
Convincing the TV not to overscan should result in a much better image quality than xrandr --transform
, which can cause visible aliasing and loss of effective resolution.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f495040%2ffix-overscan-in-linux-with-intel-graphics-vizio-hdtv%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I have the same problem, this trick works for me on an Intel HD 3000 with a cheap 720p Akira TV:
xrandr --output HDMI1 --set audio force-dvi --mode 1280x720
this works but break the audio output for me
– Francesco
Mar 19 '17 at 14:40
Spent 20 minutes searching! This worked for me
– michael
Sep 22 '17 at 19:36
add a comment |
I have the same problem, this trick works for me on an Intel HD 3000 with a cheap 720p Akira TV:
xrandr --output HDMI1 --set audio force-dvi --mode 1280x720
this works but break the audio output for me
– Francesco
Mar 19 '17 at 14:40
Spent 20 minutes searching! This worked for me
– michael
Sep 22 '17 at 19:36
add a comment |
I have the same problem, this trick works for me on an Intel HD 3000 with a cheap 720p Akira TV:
xrandr --output HDMI1 --set audio force-dvi --mode 1280x720
I have the same problem, this trick works for me on an Intel HD 3000 with a cheap 720p Akira TV:
xrandr --output HDMI1 --set audio force-dvi --mode 1280x720
answered Jul 23 '14 at 18:06
piernovpiernov
1,686917
1,686917
this works but break the audio output for me
– Francesco
Mar 19 '17 at 14:40
Spent 20 minutes searching! This worked for me
– michael
Sep 22 '17 at 19:36
add a comment |
this works but break the audio output for me
– Francesco
Mar 19 '17 at 14:40
Spent 20 minutes searching! This worked for me
– michael
Sep 22 '17 at 19:36
this works but break the audio output for me
– Francesco
Mar 19 '17 at 14:40
this works but break the audio output for me
– Francesco
Mar 19 '17 at 14:40
Spent 20 minutes searching! This worked for me
– michael
Sep 22 '17 at 19:36
Spent 20 minutes searching! This worked for me
– michael
Sep 22 '17 at 19:36
add a comment |
First, install latest Intel driver.
Add the following to /etc/rc.local
:
intel_panel_fitter -p A -x 1200 -y 670
and in the users .xprofile
:
xrandr --output HDMI1 --transform 1.0,0,+1,0,1.0,+2,0,0,1
Now the picture goes through DVI -> HDMIAdapter -> Samsung TV.
Xrandrs transform option alone did not help.
add a comment |
First, install latest Intel driver.
Add the following to /etc/rc.local
:
intel_panel_fitter -p A -x 1200 -y 670
and in the users .xprofile
:
xrandr --output HDMI1 --transform 1.0,0,+1,0,1.0,+2,0,0,1
Now the picture goes through DVI -> HDMIAdapter -> Samsung TV.
Xrandrs transform option alone did not help.
add a comment |
First, install latest Intel driver.
Add the following to /etc/rc.local
:
intel_panel_fitter -p A -x 1200 -y 670
and in the users .xprofile
:
xrandr --output HDMI1 --transform 1.0,0,+1,0,1.0,+2,0,0,1
Now the picture goes through DVI -> HDMIAdapter -> Samsung TV.
Xrandrs transform option alone did not help.
First, install latest Intel driver.
Add the following to /etc/rc.local
:
intel_panel_fitter -p A -x 1200 -y 670
and in the users .xprofile
:
xrandr --output HDMI1 --transform 1.0,0,+1,0,1.0,+2,0,0,1
Now the picture goes through DVI -> HDMIAdapter -> Samsung TV.
Xrandrs transform option alone did not help.
edited Nov 29 '14 at 11:41
answered Nov 29 '14 at 10:11
user394432user394432
312
312
add a comment |
add a comment |
It may be that your Intel graphics do not support the xrandr underscan - you can check this by trying:
xrandr --prop
...this should list the properties available, and report the status of things like underscan, if it exists.
Our Intel Celeron J1900 (SoC with graphics on chip) appears to be using the i915 kernel module and does not have many features on offer at all, according to xrandr.
Not underscan, anyway. (sigh)
About to try 'xvidtune', but it comes with dire warnings of potential hardware damage...
Hope you find a solution!
xvidtune is not the answer, it seems. Have excercised it pretty thoroughly but to no avail. Ditto the xrandr --transform option. It may be that I've missed something, of course...
– Flymo
Jun 25 '14 at 12:15
add a comment |
It may be that your Intel graphics do not support the xrandr underscan - you can check this by trying:
xrandr --prop
...this should list the properties available, and report the status of things like underscan, if it exists.
Our Intel Celeron J1900 (SoC with graphics on chip) appears to be using the i915 kernel module and does not have many features on offer at all, according to xrandr.
Not underscan, anyway. (sigh)
About to try 'xvidtune', but it comes with dire warnings of potential hardware damage...
Hope you find a solution!
xvidtune is not the answer, it seems. Have excercised it pretty thoroughly but to no avail. Ditto the xrandr --transform option. It may be that I've missed something, of course...
– Flymo
Jun 25 '14 at 12:15
add a comment |
It may be that your Intel graphics do not support the xrandr underscan - you can check this by trying:
xrandr --prop
...this should list the properties available, and report the status of things like underscan, if it exists.
Our Intel Celeron J1900 (SoC with graphics on chip) appears to be using the i915 kernel module and does not have many features on offer at all, according to xrandr.
Not underscan, anyway. (sigh)
About to try 'xvidtune', but it comes with dire warnings of potential hardware damage...
Hope you find a solution!
It may be that your Intel graphics do not support the xrandr underscan - you can check this by trying:
xrandr --prop
...this should list the properties available, and report the status of things like underscan, if it exists.
Our Intel Celeron J1900 (SoC with graphics on chip) appears to be using the i915 kernel module and does not have many features on offer at all, according to xrandr.
Not underscan, anyway. (sigh)
About to try 'xvidtune', but it comes with dire warnings of potential hardware damage...
Hope you find a solution!
answered Jun 21 '14 at 12:07
FlymoFlymo
111
111
xvidtune is not the answer, it seems. Have excercised it pretty thoroughly but to no avail. Ditto the xrandr --transform option. It may be that I've missed something, of course...
– Flymo
Jun 25 '14 at 12:15
add a comment |
xvidtune is not the answer, it seems. Have excercised it pretty thoroughly but to no avail. Ditto the xrandr --transform option. It may be that I've missed something, of course...
– Flymo
Jun 25 '14 at 12:15
xvidtune is not the answer, it seems. Have excercised it pretty thoroughly but to no avail. Ditto the xrandr --transform option. It may be that I've missed something, of course...
– Flymo
Jun 25 '14 at 12:15
xvidtune is not the answer, it seems. Have excercised it pretty thoroughly but to no avail. Ditto the xrandr --transform option. It may be that I've missed something, of course...
– Flymo
Jun 25 '14 at 12:15
add a comment |
I've been having the exact same issue with my laptop with an Intel 4000 / NVidia GTX 680M setup. Due to this issue, I was booting to my windows drive just for watching movies and whatnot. Recently installed updates on my Windows side, and POOF!, couldn't adjust it there either...
I'm glad I fixed it at last: There was one particular setting on my TV that needed to be changed from it's default. It was buried pretty well in the menus and didn't know it was there until I was reading through my TV's manual to see if I could find more information to tune my graphics with.
There was an option in there that trimmed my display down to a perfect fit, and now everything looks perfect for me all around.
Just wanted to mention it in case you haven't gone through your TV settings thoroughly (I thought I had... THREE TIMES.) I feel really dumb for having LEARNED something from the manual for my TV, but I'm happy it's at least working properly now.
add a comment |
I've been having the exact same issue with my laptop with an Intel 4000 / NVidia GTX 680M setup. Due to this issue, I was booting to my windows drive just for watching movies and whatnot. Recently installed updates on my Windows side, and POOF!, couldn't adjust it there either...
I'm glad I fixed it at last: There was one particular setting on my TV that needed to be changed from it's default. It was buried pretty well in the menus and didn't know it was there until I was reading through my TV's manual to see if I could find more information to tune my graphics with.
There was an option in there that trimmed my display down to a perfect fit, and now everything looks perfect for me all around.
Just wanted to mention it in case you haven't gone through your TV settings thoroughly (I thought I had... THREE TIMES.) I feel really dumb for having LEARNED something from the manual for my TV, but I'm happy it's at least working properly now.
add a comment |
I've been having the exact same issue with my laptop with an Intel 4000 / NVidia GTX 680M setup. Due to this issue, I was booting to my windows drive just for watching movies and whatnot. Recently installed updates on my Windows side, and POOF!, couldn't adjust it there either...
I'm glad I fixed it at last: There was one particular setting on my TV that needed to be changed from it's default. It was buried pretty well in the menus and didn't know it was there until I was reading through my TV's manual to see if I could find more information to tune my graphics with.
There was an option in there that trimmed my display down to a perfect fit, and now everything looks perfect for me all around.
Just wanted to mention it in case you haven't gone through your TV settings thoroughly (I thought I had... THREE TIMES.) I feel really dumb for having LEARNED something from the manual for my TV, but I'm happy it's at least working properly now.
I've been having the exact same issue with my laptop with an Intel 4000 / NVidia GTX 680M setup. Due to this issue, I was booting to my windows drive just for watching movies and whatnot. Recently installed updates on my Windows side, and POOF!, couldn't adjust it there either...
I'm glad I fixed it at last: There was one particular setting on my TV that needed to be changed from it's default. It was buried pretty well in the menus and didn't know it was there until I was reading through my TV's manual to see if I could find more information to tune my graphics with.
There was an option in there that trimmed my display down to a perfect fit, and now everything looks perfect for me all around.
Just wanted to mention it in case you haven't gone through your TV settings thoroughly (I thought I had... THREE TIMES.) I feel really dumb for having LEARNED something from the manual for my TV, but I'm happy it's at least working properly now.
edited Dec 24 '12 at 21:43
slhck
164k47452477
164k47452477
answered Dec 24 '12 at 19:02
KenKen
92
92
add a comment |
add a comment |
If you google overscan Vizio, you will see quite a few articles with help on this. I have an E260MV. The solution is in the TV settings.
On my model to disable overscan:
Menu - Wide - Normal
;-)
add a comment |
If you google overscan Vizio, you will see quite a few articles with help on this. I have an E260MV. The solution is in the TV settings.
On my model to disable overscan:
Menu - Wide - Normal
;-)
add a comment |
If you google overscan Vizio, you will see quite a few articles with help on this. I have an E260MV. The solution is in the TV settings.
On my model to disable overscan:
Menu - Wide - Normal
;-)
If you google overscan Vizio, you will see quite a few articles with help on this. I have an E260MV. The solution is in the TV settings.
On my model to disable overscan:
Menu - Wide - Normal
;-)
answered Dec 24 '16 at 14:13
NJRandyNJRandy
2917
2917
add a comment |
add a comment |
FWIW, I have a 2008-vintage Vizio 32" plasma VP322 (VP322HDTV10A), which did not have any usable option in the TV menus, did not expose an overscan
property in xrandr --props
, and only advertised a few modes in its EDID (either low-resolution 4:3 modes such as 800x600, or 16:9 higher-res modes with either 720 or 1080 lines).
After a bit of experimentation it turns out that the Vizio unconditionally overscanned when it saw one of the 720 or 1080 modes (labeling the output as e.g. 720p
or 1080p
), and it would NOT overscan for other modes (which it labeled as e.g .PC W x H
), moreover it would easily recognize most modes (including e.g. 1280x768 and eve funky ones like 1200x700), as PC
no-overscan modes, even if they were not advertised in its EDID.
So the following reuse of a mode that my laptop's LCD panel output already had (you can also define your own custom mode using cvt
and xrandr --newmode
) did the trick nicely, no overscan:
xrandr --addmode HDMI1 1366x768
xrandr --output HDMI1 --setmode 1366x768
Other people elsewhere had luck with different TVs by creating modes with non-standard pixel clocks (scan frequencies), but the principle was the same: circumvent "automatic" overscan decision logic in the TV that is not otherwise exposed via HDMI or TV menus.
Convincing the TV not to overscan should result in a much better image quality than xrandr --transform
, which can cause visible aliasing and loss of effective resolution.
add a comment |
FWIW, I have a 2008-vintage Vizio 32" plasma VP322 (VP322HDTV10A), which did not have any usable option in the TV menus, did not expose an overscan
property in xrandr --props
, and only advertised a few modes in its EDID (either low-resolution 4:3 modes such as 800x600, or 16:9 higher-res modes with either 720 or 1080 lines).
After a bit of experimentation it turns out that the Vizio unconditionally overscanned when it saw one of the 720 or 1080 modes (labeling the output as e.g. 720p
or 1080p
), and it would NOT overscan for other modes (which it labeled as e.g .PC W x H
), moreover it would easily recognize most modes (including e.g. 1280x768 and eve funky ones like 1200x700), as PC
no-overscan modes, even if they were not advertised in its EDID.
So the following reuse of a mode that my laptop's LCD panel output already had (you can also define your own custom mode using cvt
and xrandr --newmode
) did the trick nicely, no overscan:
xrandr --addmode HDMI1 1366x768
xrandr --output HDMI1 --setmode 1366x768
Other people elsewhere had luck with different TVs by creating modes with non-standard pixel clocks (scan frequencies), but the principle was the same: circumvent "automatic" overscan decision logic in the TV that is not otherwise exposed via HDMI or TV menus.
Convincing the TV not to overscan should result in a much better image quality than xrandr --transform
, which can cause visible aliasing and loss of effective resolution.
add a comment |
FWIW, I have a 2008-vintage Vizio 32" plasma VP322 (VP322HDTV10A), which did not have any usable option in the TV menus, did not expose an overscan
property in xrandr --props
, and only advertised a few modes in its EDID (either low-resolution 4:3 modes such as 800x600, or 16:9 higher-res modes with either 720 or 1080 lines).
After a bit of experimentation it turns out that the Vizio unconditionally overscanned when it saw one of the 720 or 1080 modes (labeling the output as e.g. 720p
or 1080p
), and it would NOT overscan for other modes (which it labeled as e.g .PC W x H
), moreover it would easily recognize most modes (including e.g. 1280x768 and eve funky ones like 1200x700), as PC
no-overscan modes, even if they were not advertised in its EDID.
So the following reuse of a mode that my laptop's LCD panel output already had (you can also define your own custom mode using cvt
and xrandr --newmode
) did the trick nicely, no overscan:
xrandr --addmode HDMI1 1366x768
xrandr --output HDMI1 --setmode 1366x768
Other people elsewhere had luck with different TVs by creating modes with non-standard pixel clocks (scan frequencies), but the principle was the same: circumvent "automatic" overscan decision logic in the TV that is not otherwise exposed via HDMI or TV menus.
Convincing the TV not to overscan should result in a much better image quality than xrandr --transform
, which can cause visible aliasing and loss of effective resolution.
FWIW, I have a 2008-vintage Vizio 32" plasma VP322 (VP322HDTV10A), which did not have any usable option in the TV menus, did not expose an overscan
property in xrandr --props
, and only advertised a few modes in its EDID (either low-resolution 4:3 modes such as 800x600, or 16:9 higher-res modes with either 720 or 1080 lines).
After a bit of experimentation it turns out that the Vizio unconditionally overscanned when it saw one of the 720 or 1080 modes (labeling the output as e.g. 720p
or 1080p
), and it would NOT overscan for other modes (which it labeled as e.g .PC W x H
), moreover it would easily recognize most modes (including e.g. 1280x768 and eve funky ones like 1200x700), as PC
no-overscan modes, even if they were not advertised in its EDID.
So the following reuse of a mode that my laptop's LCD panel output already had (you can also define your own custom mode using cvt
and xrandr --newmode
) did the trick nicely, no overscan:
xrandr --addmode HDMI1 1366x768
xrandr --output HDMI1 --setmode 1366x768
Other people elsewhere had luck with different TVs by creating modes with non-standard pixel clocks (scan frequencies), but the principle was the same: circumvent "automatic" overscan decision logic in the TV that is not otherwise exposed via HDMI or TV menus.
Convincing the TV not to overscan should result in a much better image quality than xrandr --transform
, which can cause visible aliasing and loss of effective resolution.
answered 11 hours ago
vladrvladr
439144
439144
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f495040%2ffix-overscan-in-linux-with-intel-graphics-vizio-hdtv%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It looks like Ironlake and above Intel graphics cards have an overscan compensation (accessed on Linux by
intel_panel_fitter
) - so if you have a TV new enough to allow disabling overscan, or a processor new enough to compensate for a poorly designed TV, you're good. (But if you're like me and have an obsolete processor AND a problematic TV, you're out of luck...)– JamesTheAwesomeDude
Feb 14 '15 at 0:17